126 lines
6.5 KiB
Plaintext
126 lines
6.5 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : STILTIME.ASC | Online Date : 06/10/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
|
|
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
This file raises some interesting questions about our perception of 'reality'.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
220 15188 <3qaoqj$sqa@newsbf02.news.aol.com> article
|
|
Path: ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.
|
|
aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
|
|
From: curemonger@aol.com (CUREMONGER)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
|
|
Subject: Reality (and black hole radiation) gets thrown for a loop
|
|
Date: 28 May 1995 17:09:39 -0400
|
|
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
|
|
Lines: 72
|
|
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
|
|
Message-ID: <3qaoqj$sqa@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
|
|
Reply-To: curemonger@aol.com (CUREMONGER)
|
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
|
|
|
|
Well science has done it to reality again! Damn math and Algebra goble-de-
|
|
goop.
|
|
|
|
For a moment take a step back and stop trying to think of things in three
|
|
dimensional Cartiesian Geometry, good you're probably all there already.
|
|
|
|
Now I've got a hot little thought going on about the true speed of light, the
|
|
expansion of the universe, time travel, blackhole radiation and the
|
|
proportionality of probability on reality.
|
|
|
|
Yes! it actually changes as the universe expands (yet the probabilities stay
|
|
constant, they simply grow in magnitude). So does anyone want to hear a hot
|
|
thought on why light breaks into matter and anti-matter (regardless of all
|
|
previous ideas, Hey I'm not trying to educate anyone or anything, I'm just
|
|
issuing some food for thought!)
|
|
|
|
Check this out..... The universe is expanding in a cone thats widening at an
|
|
exponential rate. So if the X+Y axis were quantity of Space (Y) and Time(X)
|
|
the increments of those axis would increase at an exponential rate. 2, 4, 16,
|
|
blah blah blah.......and then the line of S= 1 / (X^2 / C^2)^.5 is a straight
|
|
upward slope.
|
|
|
|
In normal increments it looks like a "Gabriels Horn." Now if you take the
|
|
curved line and plot a triangle between point normal (P)
|
|
|
|
space | | this is how the drawing came
|
|
| | across as in ASCII characters
|
|
Original drawing | /
|
|
| ________ /
|
|
|_____________P_
|
|
time
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
space | | this version might be closer
|
|
| | to the curve the author speaks
|
|
Altered drawing | / of
|
|
| ________ /
|
|
|_____________P_
|
|
time
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
You get voila! the quantity of REALITY, Ok this sounds crazy but just let
|
|
it sink in...now take the difference in the plottings and you get an ever
|
|
increasingly large probability triangle (above the reality triangle) that
|
|
is the proportionality of reality to probability.
|
|
|
|
This comes into play with time travel and plotting the probability of a
|
|
paradox by knowing the probability of alternate outcomes. (Based on the
|
|
probability of regressing on certain event horizons.) Well blah blah blah If
|
|
you want a better more descriptive diagram you'll have to give me your address
|
|
so I can send some real graphs and not this ascii crap.
|
|
|
|
On to black hole radiation. Lets say you plot the expansion of the universe
|
|
along a time & space graph (space representing the manifold three dimensions
|
|
as one quantity) now presume that the resulting curve (use the above formula)
|
|
is the progression of a light beam which is the very farthest from the center
|
|
of the universe. (Because along Space and time travels light, needing both to
|
|
exist.
|
|
|
|
Time causes light to appear curved, space telling light how to curve) [and of
|
|
course light being egotistical and obnoxiouse ever since Einstein gave it it's
|
|
heyday] Light disregards both of their effects on itself.
|
|
|
|
So light travels along any proportionally curved path inside that original
|
|
"maximum" curve of the graph. (I won't go into it here but it also seems to
|
|
suggest by plotting a few handy differentials that light farthest from the
|
|
center of the universe should travel faster than all other light.)
|
|
|
|
Now say light hits a little spot where there is no space but there is time.
|
|
Basically a trough where it cannot travel at the speed of light. It must
|
|
destroy itself to create space (matter & anti matter) to travel that space.
|
|
|
|
You may ask "but how can there be no space" Simple it is a point where there
|
|
is no matter, and all energy fields are balanced out perfectly, in fact there
|
|
would be neither matter nor field lines in that area.
|
|
|
|
By the sake of other fields they are not canceled out, but driven away to form
|
|
a perfect void of space. An area of this space would be quite difficult to
|
|
detect.
|
|
|
|
Say you hold a RADAR gun and aim it a a 5 mile strech of "no space" behind
|
|
which there is a star. Your gun would say (when directed to determine the
|
|
distance between you and the object the gun is pointed at) that there is
|
|
no distance.
|
|
|
|
In fact you would be dead, You shouldn't stand so close to stars. Now I have
|
|
no postulate on what happens to light where there is no time. I can only think
|
|
that for that pocket light is allowed to not curve. Wacky huh. Well these
|
|
happen to be just Ideas, but they have unique possibilities. Hope you
|
|
respond.
|
|
|
|
Cure.
|
|
|
|
P.S. If you also noticed that some of the implications of the above formula
|
|
are that eventually time will come to a stand still while space procreates at
|
|
an infinite rate don't worry. The process will go back in on itself. So
|
|
basically the universe has never changed. Simply the quantity of time has
|
|
shifted in favor or space.
|
|
|
|
P.P.S. Don't rag the spelling errors, OK?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|