1189 lines
56 KiB
Plaintext
1189 lines
56 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=78, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
July 13, 1990
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Date: 5/19/90
|
|
|
|
A LOOK AT SCALAR TECHNOLOGY AND ONE OF ITS APPLICATIONS:
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
EXTRAORDINARY SCIENCE, VOL II, ISSUE 1, Jan/Feb/Mar 1990
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
|
|
Warren York
|
|
7101 N. Mesa
|
|
Suite 133
|
|
El Paso,TX 79912
|
|
[915] 521-5610
|
|
|
|
provided courtesy of Cheyenne Mountain BBS
|
|
|
|
3D TIME & SPACE:
|
|
|
|
For simplicity and concept of understanding I will be describing
|
|
what we have come to know as the real world or what we perceive as
|
|
being a three dimensional time and space on a linear plane.
|
|
|
|
The three dimensions being length, height and width. It really is
|
|
a four diminsional space of which time being a man made factor for
|
|
reference is the fourth dimension.
|
|
|
|
In reality space time is curved. If we zero in close enough we can
|
|
talk about it as if it were linear if for nothing other than simplicity
|
|
and understanding. If I were to try and talk about time and space as it
|
|
really is then it would become complex dealing with arcs, spherical
|
|
dimensions and higher mathemathics as kerr metrics. For now we will
|
|
consider our dimension as a three dimensional time cube.
|
|
|
|
HYPERSPACE:
|
|
|
|
In Fig. 1 we have our 3D Space/Time Cube. Our X axis will
|
|
represent the axis of acceleration. The Z axis is our matter or object
|
|
axis.
|
|
|
|
As our object target we will use a rectangular box having known
|
|
length, height and width. [See Fig.5] It is not important to assign
|
|
values to these figures as of yet. The pictorial concept is the
|
|
important value of what I have to say about time and space.
|
|
|
|
We will let the Y axis represent Lambda or Light. It is light
|
|
itself and not necessarily the speed of light. This would mean that
|
|
light is 90 degrees in our 3D Space/Time Cube to matter. If we shifted
|
|
reference points by rotation this would make our Z axis or matter axis
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now light and our Y axis which was our Light axis now matter. This is
|
|
important for this is where Planks constant comes in. This makes Planks
|
|
constant as important in our 3D Space/Time Cube as the speed of light
|
|
is in the formula E=MC squared, E being energy, M the mass and C the
|
|
speed of light.
|
|
|
|
You should now have a clear picture or viewpoint in your mind of
|
|
the 3 dimensional rectangular box resting in our 3D Space/Time Cube in
|
|
reference to our linear X,Y and X axis or perceivable world.
|
|
|
|
The fourth dimension being acceleration or the change in time one,
|
|
delta one start reference point and time two or delta two the last
|
|
reference point which will also give us the distance travelled between
|
|
delta one and delta two. Now in Fig.5 look at the leading edge of our
|
|
box which is parallel with the Y axis or light axis Lambda.
|
|
|
|
Now this leading edge is our reference point when we start talking
|
|
about delta one to delta two or acceleration to the speed of light. Yes
|
|
we cannot accelerate matter to the speed of light due to friction, but
|
|
for all purposes we don't know that yet.
|
|
|
|
Let's just say we can for now and friction and other factors do
|
|
not have an effect on our box. This friction and other factors is what
|
|
Chuck Yeager thought he found at Mach one as the demon. Well the demon
|
|
is there but way above Mach one and way below the speed of light. The
|
|
demon is friction and resistance factors of which we don't need to
|
|
worry about in our pictorial view. [See Fig.4 & 5] Now let's say we
|
|
just found some super fuel called Element 115 for now. This is an
|
|
inside pun, but it will do for those of you who need a physical means
|
|
to drive our box to and beyond the speed of light.
|
|
|
|
We now set our box the Z axis in motion along the direction to the
|
|
right on the X axis or acceleration plane. As we accelerate to the
|
|
speed of light we will start to bend Space/Time itself. This means our
|
|
Z axis will start to swing up toward our Y axis as we approach the
|
|
speed of light. [ See Fig. 5, A, B & C ] Notice if we redraw our box in
|
|
reference to our grid the box will seem to elongate as space/time is
|
|
bent. This is what Einstein was talking about in relativity with the
|
|
Lorentz Transformation.
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind at this point we are not moving along with the new
|
|
box but looking at it from its original starting point. If we were to
|
|
move with the box we would see no change in the space warp as to the
|
|
box itself. In other words the box would not seem to elongate from
|
|
within its own reference point but only from the original observers
|
|
viewpoint.
|
|
|
|
Now in our three dimensional space/time there is one thing that we
|
|
perceive in only two dimensions and that is a shadow of which light is
|
|
a contributing factor. Now from our orignal reference point when we
|
|
reach the speed of light the box would be perceived as a beam of light
|
|
and the matter axis would have been warped or bent back on itself and
|
|
from our original observer point would no longer be in our 3D space.
|
|
|
|
At that point if we continue to accelerate with our super fuel
|
|
Element 115 to two times the speed of light we are now swapping our X
|
|
axis for the Y axis since we have flipped 90 degrees and the box is in
|
|
its new dimension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the box once again reaches another C in acceleration from
|
|
delta one we would once again see the box but it would be 180 degrees
|
|
out from our old 3 dimensional point. After it reaches three C and goes
|
|
on to 4 C then you can kiss it goodbye for all practical purposes.
|
|
|
|
How long before we ever reached one C we found that demon that
|
|
Yeager was looking for. Now friction and the other resistive factors [
|
|
The Demon ] tell us Mother Nature will never allow us to approach the
|
|
problem of acceleration to the speed of light by shear brute force
|
|
alone. How sad, for I think we were on to something if it just wasn't
|
|
for this Demon.
|
|
|
|
Wait! there is still hope. Let's fool Mother nature. Is there
|
|
another way to bend Space/Time itself? Mother nature does it every day
|
|
herself.
|
|
|
|
Before we can go on we must stop and look at just what is
|
|
Space/Time itself. It's been called the Aether among other things.
|
|
Let's just look at it as Jello or flexible rubber that is realitive to
|
|
us. It can and is detected but misunderstood as electromagnetic
|
|
fields.
|
|
|
|
RF radiation or wave propagation through this space time are
|
|
constructed with electromagnetic fields but in such a manner that they
|
|
cause propagation in space time where electromagnetic fields alone only
|
|
stress, twist and distort space time.
|
|
|
|
When the fields are removed by cutting off electron flow in a
|
|
conductor [ coil ] the space time snaps back to the form before the
|
|
distortion. This brings us to just what is this space time we have been
|
|
talking about?
|
|
|
|
THE AETHER:
|
|
|
|
This flexible rubber, Jello or what ever you wish to call it is
|
|
Space Time itself or what Space Time is made up of. It has been called
|
|
the Aether in the past so we shall also call it the Aether.
|
|
|
|
Now I know there has been debates on the existance of an Aether or
|
|
not for many years. The last acceptance was that it did not exist. For
|
|
thoses of you who wish to research into this aspect may wish to review
|
|
the Silvertooth experiment. "
|
|
|
|
Abstract #1: Michelson-Morley type experiments are shown to be non-
|
|
sequitors because their logic fails to take into account
|
|
the relationship between wavelength and propagation
|
|
velocity. An experimental demonstration of anisotropy
|
|
in wavelength is described." [1] "
|
|
|
|
Abstract #2: After a lapse of 100 years the Silvertooth experiment has
|
|
achieved Michelson's objective and detected the Earth's
|
|
motion through space by optical interference. The
|
|
consequences of this new experiment will have a traumatic
|
|
effect on physics. A related issue is the question of
|
|
reinterpreting the null result of the Trouton-Noble
|
|
experiment, the electrodynamic equivalent of the
|
|
Michelson-Morley experiment." [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now nature distorts this Aether all the time by natural proccesses
|
|
that take place. We can see the results and feel this distortion as
|
|
pressure of the Aether [ 3 dimensional Space/Time ].
|
|
|
|
If you have ever placed two magnets next to each other you can see
|
|
and feel the attracting or repelling forces involved in this distortion
|
|
of Space/Time. We call this magnetic flux but it is the actual Aether
|
|
you feel and see as movement taking place.
|
|
|
|
Now if we send electrons down a conductor we find a magnetic flux
|
|
is generated in accordance to the left hand rule. That is the flux or
|
|
Aether is moving in the direction or twisting in the direction of the
|
|
left hand rule based on direction of electron flow or travel.
|
|
|
|
[ See Extraordinary Science, Volume 1, Issue 2, page 9 ]
|
|
|
|
In figure 2 I have attempted to show the flux from a moving
|
|
electron down a conductor. I did not display it as I had wished. In
|
|
reality, it will look more like a spring as the flux lags the electrons
|
|
movement through the Aether.
|
|
|
|
Now we see that not only can nature produce a small space/time
|
|
distortion with the distortion being the magnetic fields themselves but
|
|
man can generate the same distortions but controled with
|
|
electromegnetics. Since this is true then man can get around the
|
|
demon by bending space/time [ Aether ] with Scalar technology of
|
|
which electromagnetics makes up such processes. See Fig. 3.
|
|
|
|
To bend Space/Time and produce time travel or invisibility you
|
|
will need to build at least four generators. One of the generators will
|
|
need to be as a time reference point for the other three generators
|
|
which control the bending of the X, Y, and Z axis. [ See Fig. 4 & 5. ]
|
|
|
|
We will be going over this again and again in the future as I show
|
|
more and more of the actual mechanism in producing such effects. It is
|
|
only important to obtain a slight pictorial view of how this
|
|
application is linked to Scalar Technology.
|
|
|
|
There is a lot more involved than this simple view I have just
|
|
given but I hope you have a little better understanding of how a
|
|
proccess can actually be produced and what you may be playing with in
|
|
your search to understand Scalar. Remember I have presented this view
|
|
on a linear plane of which it is not in reality.
|
|
|
|
It can be done on a spherical plane but what it will look like
|
|
will be a mirror image folding in on itself. For now just try to
|
|
understand it using our 3D Space/Time Cube. This application will fall
|
|
in the field of The Philadelphia Experiment, Hyperspace drives and Time
|
|
travel. We have only begun our journy into Scalar Technology. The
|
|
UNIFIELD!
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES: [1] & [2] Speculations in Science and Technology
|
|
Volume 10, Number 1, 1987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I
|
|
|
|
By Warren E. York
|
|
|
|
A SECOND APPLICATION OF SCALAR TECHNOLOGY: GRAVITY
|
|
|
|
[ CORRECTIONS ]
|
|
|
|
I wish to point out a correction in FIG.3 of last issue. The
|
|
direction of the arrows indicating Aether rotation and stated as being
|
|
the same thing as a magnetic field is shown going in the counter
|
|
clockwise direction for the positive end or right side of the drawing.
|
|
|
|
This flow should be changed to show clockwise rotation for the
|
|
right side or positive side only. This error was noticed due to recent
|
|
developments and observations of Aether mechanics. This brings me to
|
|
the correction on the second error which was stated as the Aether and
|
|
EMF [magnetic flux field] being one in the same thing.
|
|
|
|
This is half true. It is now my understanding that the Aether flow
|
|
is inverse to the magnetic flux flow and non symmetrical to it. Fig 2.
|
|
For those of you who are technicians or professionals, you should be
|
|
aware of the two electron flow theories.
|
|
|
|
The first and accepted one is that positive energy travels from
|
|
positive to negative from a battery or source through a conductor and
|
|
the not so accepted but also true theory of hole flow.
|
|
|
|
That is the empty space left in an atom's outer orbit which is
|
|
like a hole which travels backwards in the conductor. That would be
|
|
negative to positive.
|
|
|
|
So the new understanding is that the Aether flow is inverse to
|
|
magnetic flow. Electrons and Aether flow interact with each other. The
|
|
next correction is a typo of the word Ether. I had spelled Either and
|
|
it should be Aether to indicate other than the gas called Ether. [See
|
|
last ssue]
|
|
|
|
[ Fig.3 Extraordinary Science, Jan/Feb/Mar 1990, page 17 ]
|
|
|
|
[ RESEARCHERS ]
|
|
|
|
Matt Campbell currently employed by the U.S. Government has taken
|
|
me up on my offer to form a small think tank research team. Matt
|
|
lives here in El Paso, Texas and has a strong background on the new
|
|
technologies. He had read my article on Scalar Technologies and found a
|
|
direct relationship with his own study on Vortexes. He learned I was
|
|
right here in the same town and called to drop by and compare notes.
|
|
|
|
We learned we were both studying the same thing and decided to
|
|
join ideas and reasoning which I have already set into motion under the
|
|
title Scalar Technologies. Since we have joined forces our deductions
|
|
have progressed to the engineering of a proto type model test coil. Fig
|
|
1A.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Henry C. Montieth has agreed to work with us and review our
|
|
work so as to keep us on track and prevent wasted man hours on an
|
|
improper assumption or an erroneous test run. Dr. Montieth has twenty
|
|
years of service with Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, New
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico; he holds a PhD in applied Physics as well as a Master's degree
|
|
in electrical engineering.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Montieth has written several papers of which one I will list
|
|
here under references [19] for those of you who wish to review how he
|
|
thinks in relation to our work. He knows of Lt. Col Tom Beardon's work
|
|
and is a theoretical physicist himself. As an educated critic his
|
|
understanding of our approach will be most helpful in this study.
|
|
|
|
I am in the process of contacting other researchers but time to
|
|
fit everything into one day is hard to find. My personal feeling is
|
|
that the most knowledgeable man in this field I have come across to
|
|
date is Dr. Moray B. King. I am in hopes he will join us in some
|
|
behalf in this study in the near future. You may have seen one of his
|
|
papers here in Extraordinary Science, Oct/Nov/Dec 1989, page 8, Scalar
|
|
Current. I have talked with him over the phone but to date strange as
|
|
it may seem we have not had the chance to compare notes and thoughts.
|
|
|
|
From what I have read of his thinking from his book [ Tapping The
|
|
Zero-Point Energy ] we have come up with the same deductions without
|
|
knowing of each others work. I would also like to give my special
|
|
thanks to Theodor Ernst Bart a research and development engineer in
|
|
Switzerland for RCA laboratories. Through his own research in scalar
|
|
technology he has sent me lab photos Fig 2. showing Aetheric flow using
|
|
a color TV screen as an instrument. This idea was first suggested and
|
|
done by Lt. Col Tom Beardon.
|
|
|
|
If others wish to contact Matt Campbell, Dr. Montieth or myself on
|
|
related work, questions or additional information you may write to our
|
|
new central mailing address in care of:
|
|
|
|
INFO/NET
|
|
7101 N. MESA
|
|
SUITE 133
|
|
EL PASO, TEXAS 79912
|
|
|
|
All inquiries will be handled through this address or you may
|
|
still call 915 521-5610. Dr. Montieth will be joining us on the
|
|
computer net for those of you who wish to join our information net
|
|
which is online 24 hours a day.
|
|
|
|
In our approach we review the work and papers of others to
|
|
formulate and engineer working models of our own on the different
|
|
concepts. In short we are trying to take ideas and concepts and turn
|
|
them into reality through working experiments and practical devices.
|
|
Your insight and suggestions are welcome to help formulate and narrow
|
|
down these tests.
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAVITY
|
|
|
|
In our last issue I had discussed how scalar may relate to
|
|
interdimensional doorways or windows. Since this time I have obtained
|
|
a short video of such a process actually taking place. The manipulation
|
|
of Time and Space itself or better termed manipulation of the Aether.
|
|
|
|
I did not go into how to actually make a doorway or window but
|
|
only show how Scalar is a part in the process to develop such a device.
|
|
Hence when you manipulate time and space you also will have effects
|
|
of gravity. There is a lot of work to be done with this process and
|
|
for obvious reasons it is very tricky, involved and dangerous.
|
|
|
|
Without a time sync or Aether flow lock one could end up with
|
|
matter embedded within matter as reported in Project Rainbow
|
|
[ Philadelphia Experiment ]. Before we can go on to discuss just how
|
|
scalar technology can produce gravity we need a pictorial view of just
|
|
what gravity is.
|
|
|
|
Notice I did not say anti-gravity. That brings us to just what is
|
|
gravity? Has anybody ever explained the true nature of gravity to you?
|
|
In other words what gravity really is or its makeup?
|
|
|
|
Well some people say it is a pressure or outside force and others
|
|
say it is a wave or something called a graviton that makes it up. Still
|
|
they have been unable to identify it in a test. We can detect it
|
|
because we see the effect of it but we cannot describe the nature of
|
|
just what it really is.
|
|
|
|
If you look at the equations of EMF or Maxwells equations and
|
|
those of gravity you will see similarities in nature. If you have ever
|
|
played with two magnets and seen and felt the fields you are close to
|
|
just what the true nature of gravity is. If we look at the properties
|
|
of EMF we find two polarities or charges if electrostatic. That is a
|
|
minus and a plus.
|
|
|
|
In EMF, like charges repel and unlike attract. You can see this
|
|
with the north and south poles of a magnet. Place two souths or two
|
|
norths together and you will notice the repulsion. Likewise place two
|
|
like poles together and you will see the attraction.
|
|
|
|
The earth has a North pole and a South pole just like a magnet.
|
|
Fig 2A I know what you are thinking, but no, gravity is not a magnetic
|
|
field or at least not as we know magnetic fields to be. The best way
|
|
is to give you a pictorial view of the mechanics of gravity.
|
|
|
|
Take a look at Fig.3A, an electron's graphic orrery and its
|
|
interactions with the Aether. The Aether is a fluid grid of
|
|
reciprocating type of energy which is omnidirectional, has duality
|
|
properties and is that of all time and space is made of; however, I
|
|
will not go into what the exact nature of the Aether is at this time.
|
|
|
|
Now when we send this electron down a conductor Fig 5 from outer
|
|
orbit to outer orbit of each atom in the conductor we are moving on the
|
|
direction line or "I" the inertia line represented as the X axis. Fig
|
|
3A.
|
|
|
|
Notice in Fig 5 the cone or spiral shaped rotation the Aether and
|
|
the inverse flow of the magnetic flux field takes. Now in Fig 2A. if
|
|
|
|
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
you look at the electron in respect as it being earth then you will see
|
|
its magnetic Aether inverse flux fields around its axis of rotation or
|
|
EMF flux fields as north and south poles [labeled "P"].
|
|
|
|
Now picture all these electrons in the outer orbits of each bit of
|
|
matter on Earth and the Earth rotating on it pole axis. Fig 1. This is
|
|
what gives earth its magnetic flux and inverse Aether fields and north
|
|
and south poles. Fig 2A. The "F" or flux field is what is known as a
|
|
closed loop of Aether rotation. Keep this in mind for this accounts for
|
|
the similarities in formulas of electromagnetic fields and gravity
|
|
formulas.
|
|
|
|
Electromagnetic having plus or minus or attraction and repulsion
|
|
and gravity only having attraction. To produce a gravity field all one
|
|
has to do is create an Aether flow pump which is in one direction. Now
|
|
how does matter or a planet produce this Aether pump that we observe as
|
|
gravity? Fig 1 The nucleus of the atom plays a part but once again
|
|
let's keep it simple and just look at one aspect for now.
|
|
|
|
Movement of matter through the Aether due to spin on [ just for
|
|
now ] the electron causes friction on the Aether. If you move Aether
|
|
through mass you get gravity. If you move mass through Aether you get
|
|
inertia.
|
|
|
|
By the way, the Aether itself causes the spin of the electron.
|
|
They can effect each other and this is where friction is termed. Time
|
|
and space is moving through our ball of matter and from another
|
|
viewpoint matter is moving through time and space, time and space being
|
|
the Aether or one in the same.
|
|
|
|
Aether is omnidirectional reciprocating energy and it can impart
|
|
that energy in the form of rotation of the electron since they interact
|
|
with each other. Now this friction which is the imparting mechanism
|
|
between the Aether and the electron and will direct or curve the Aether
|
|
to an extent from the surface of the electron.
|
|
|
|
Put a bunch of these little spinning surfaces together and they
|
|
direct or pump the Aether to the center of the matter in question. Fig
|
|
1. Aether being energy with no mass can fill an infinite amount of
|
|
space at the center with no problem of conflict with itself.
|
|
|
|
There is no difference in a bucket of Aether or a pinhead of
|
|
Aether. It takes up no space since it is energy and what space is made
|
|
of. This also is where the duality of the Aether comes in. By space I
|
|
also mean empty space or the lack of matter. Matt's vortex technology
|
|
holds true to this process.
|
|
|
|
Scalar is a means of engineering controlled vortex in a specific
|
|
manner to produce a desired effect. Using scalar technology we can
|
|
produce this Aether pump [Aether Diode] with control. This means that
|
|
we can produce a gravity point and everything within our field will
|
|
fall to that point with no effect on the normal gravity field produced
|
|
by the planet since our new field overrides the earth's field.
|
|
|
|
With a balance between this new point and the planet's gravity
|
|
field, or pump, we can have control of field enclosed matter. This is
|
|
why I did not say anti-gravity for we generate our own gravity which is
|
|
not really anti-gravity. There is a video tape out which will
|
|
demonstrate this effect in part.[15] Longitudinal waves, or RC, as Matt
|
|
|
|
Page 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and I call it is put through a light bulb [ with no gases only a vacuum
|
|
]. Standard current gives off the glow of photons and heat can be felt
|
|
from the lamp.
|
|
|
|
When RC current is used the lamp is brighter, cool to the touch
|
|
and has new noticeable characteristics besides the color of
|
|
illumination. First,it has electrostatic characteristics where a
|
|
copper mesh ribbon will be attracted to the source of the light; and
|
|
secondly your hand can feel the pressure Aethric flow from the source.
|
|
|
|
This pressure is omni-radial Aether flow or kin to gravity but not
|
|
in the form of a monopole direction yet. This is the start of building
|
|
what can be called a tractor-beam device. Thats one that can attract or
|
|
repel matter as down a laser beam. Dr. Z, I am told, is working on just
|
|
such a device. Nature produces a monopole flow of Aether all the time
|
|
in matter and we call this gravity. Fig 1.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
REALIZATION OF A NEW FORM OF ENERGY GENERATED
|
|
[ RC ] or Reciprocating Current
|
|
|
|
In a recent understanding of scalar technology Matt and myself
|
|
have come to a realization of a new form of energy which is produced
|
|
and needed to drive this Aether pump to produce gravity.
|
|
|
|
We are not the first to discover it but the first to go on record
|
|
calling it RC [ Reciprocating Current ] Dr. King calls it Scalar
|
|
Current and Dr. Nikola Tesla called it longitudinal waves.
|
|
|
|
Now Tesla was known for AC [ Alternating Current ] and
|
|
Westinghouse for DC [ Direct Current ]. Direct current is the current
|
|
from a battery cell with negative to positive flow [ hole theory ] or
|
|
positive to negative flow [ electron flow theory ].
|
|
|
|
We can thank Tesla for our using AC voltage today. He found that
|
|
AC was more efficient and could travel longer distances without need of
|
|
amplification. We have not done away with DC, for it is still needed
|
|
in car batteries flashlights, and portable electronic equipment. We do
|
|
not use DC through the house wiring because AC is the more efficient
|
|
for this purpose. With RC, DC and AC will still be needed, but RC will
|
|
have some advantages over AC or DC. RC voltage will travel on the
|
|
surface of the conductor therefore giving characteristics of
|
|
superconductivity.
|
|
|
|
That is to say that resistance will not be of great importance
|
|
with RC. It is known as cold electrons due to this ability and most
|
|
incandescent lamps will almost never burn out due to very little
|
|
heating up of the filament.
|
|
|
|
You would not be able to use RC voltage on an electric stove or
|
|
heating blanket or total electric heater.
|
|
|
|
Another property of RC is electrostatic characteristics. RC
|
|
voltage will travel down a conductor almost like microwave does in a
|
|
waveguide.
|
|
|
|
The E [ electric ] and B [ magnetic ] fields have traded positions
|
|
with the B field being longitudinal now to the conductor. Fig 5A [23]
|
|
|
|
Page 9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is where Tesla got the name longitudinal wave. Matt and I
|
|
choose to use RC due to it fitting into the scheme of things along with
|
|
AC and DC.
|
|
|
|
No big changes will be needed to adapt RC to the now existing
|
|
wiring. Most likely RC will be generated off the main line used for AC
|
|
at the point of need. Likewise DC will be used in much the same way as
|
|
far as application.
|
|
|
|
I don't think you will find large RC power plants for this would
|
|
be impractical and not needed. A Tesla coil will produce this RC energy
|
|
or you may wish to build a coil similar to our test coil being used to
|
|
map the fields and properties of RC current. Fig 1A,1B & 4A
|
|
|
|
Unlike this basic construction given here of an RC generator our
|
|
test coil has eight primaries of which only four are shown in Fig 4A &
|
|
1B and my scalar coil described in Jul/Aug/Sep issue as the secondary.
|
|
|
|
It turns out that coil described in issue Jul/Aug/Sep 1989
|
|
Extradordinary Science, page 16 will generate scalar activity but is
|
|
better used as an induction receiving coil for this RC energy. The
|
|
coils are self tuned through K1 which is a adjustable induction
|
|
vibrator. Fig 6A.[22]
|
|
|
|
I want to recap for just a minute and then present a paper written
|
|
by Matt Campbell on our work. Matt will be saying the same thing but
|
|
in a different manner.
|
|
|
|
Between the two of us we hope you will get a clearer view of the
|
|
important points we are trying to bring out to assist you in your own
|
|
research into this fantastic technology and related topics.
|
|
|
|
Our present work is in mapping of the fields. The following recap
|
|
is what we have found or are in the process of finding to be true or
|
|
not true in this research.
|
|
|
|
1. The Aether exists. It is Time and Space itself. [1]
|
|
2. The Aether is reciprocating omnidirectional grid of energy
|
|
by nature. [19]
|
|
3. The Aether and EMF are gyroscopic in nature.
|
|
4. The Aether has properties of duality. The Aether is a
|
|
fluidatic energy Fig 7A. and follows some of the fluid
|
|
dynamic laws of other known fluids but unique with
|
|
additional properties being that of a fluidatic energy.
|
|
Mass and energy properties kind of like the photon. The
|
|
photon may be the Aether itself but in a different form.
|
|
Light is matter ninety degrees to the Aether or our 3D
|
|
Space/Time and the Aether is light ninety degrees to matter
|
|
in our 3D Space/Time.[See last Issue]
|
|
5. The Aether is relative to the speed of light.
|
|
6. The Aether interacts with the electron and perhaps the
|
|
proton.Fig 4
|
|
7. The Aether is an inverse flow of the EMF flux field but non
|
|
symmetrical. It can form nodel lodes or zones unlike the
|
|
closed loop of flux in a magnetic field.
|
|
8. The fluid flow of Aether reacts on the surface of an
|
|
electron as the water vortexes do on earth. The flows will
|
|
be " Hi's to Lo's" but relative to your reference and the
|
|
poles of spin. Fig 2.
|
|
|
|
Page 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Aether moving through Mass gives Gravity effects. Fig 7A
|
|
10. Mass moving through the Aether gives Inertia effects. [Like
|
|
in a Gyro]
|
|
11. A conductor moving through a EMF flux field or a EMF flux
|
|
field moving through a conductor gives electrons.
|
|
12. Electrons moving through a conductor gives you EMF flux.
|
|
13. In the flux field flow the North and South Pole would be
|
|
the same as a Lo in Aether flow flux and the equator would
|
|
be a Hi. Fig 3.
|
|
14. Without Aether nothing would exist. It is time/space and
|
|
existence itself.
|
|
15. Scalar technology is but one method of munipulating the
|
|
Aether but unique do to the results it produces. It is the
|
|
key factor in studying and understanding gravity, time and
|
|
relativity.
|
|
16. All Aether effects can be obtained and explained from
|
|
conventional methods now in practice.
|
|
17. I suspect the proton and neutron interact with the Aether
|
|
also.
|
|
|
|
I feel the neutron has the biggest play in this role of gravity.
|
|
Further investigation will be needed to find out but the neutron is a
|
|
happy particle with the same equalness or balance of charge in
|
|
relationship to mass so to speak as the Aether has an equalness
|
|
[reciprocating] of high's and lo's in relationship to energy.[2]
|
|
|
|
To make it simple I feel the neutron tends to lock into the Aether
|
|
itself due to gyroscopic action and is pulled along with the flow where
|
|
the electron and proton are only part of the total balance of this
|
|
vortex where they effect or warp the Aether to each it's own happy
|
|
balance of the total reciprocation or vortex.[20]
|
|
|
|
There is much testing and exploring to be done. I hope this will
|
|
give some of you new insight into your own research and you will share
|
|
your findings with the rest of us. This info will only get us into the
|
|
ballpark but I feel that is a good place to start for we are closer to
|
|
home plate now then left field where man has been for some time.
|
|
|
|
The door is only unlocked. It is time to peek in and explore for
|
|
all mankind both present and past. Warren E. York 1990
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Part II
|
|
By Matt Campbell
|
|
|
|
DEDICATION
|
|
|
|
My Wife and Daughter
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
|
This paper is the joint research effort of Warren York and myself,
|
|
telephone conferences with Dr. Henry C. Monteith, G. Harry Stine,
|
|
Moray B. King, and Oliver Nichelson.
|
|
|
|
Additional information was provided by private correspondences
|
|
with James Bozonas. I wish to extend a "THANK-YOU" and note to Peter
|
|
Lindermann of Boderland Sciences Research Foundation, who unknowingly
|
|
assisted our research in the video tape TESLA LONGITUDIAL ELECTRICITY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You had the stars in your hand and you almost let them slip
|
|
through your fingers. Let the reader please keep in mind that this
|
|
paper is open to debate and experimentation. Changes to the theories
|
|
introduced here will appear in later works.
|
|
|
|
Also a note on the nature of the Aether, namely that as pure
|
|
energy it reciprocates from highs to lows, and takes on characteristics
|
|
of duality like a photon but is unique in its own right.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
BEYOND THE EVENT HORIZON
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Matt Campbell
|
|
and Joint Research with
|
|
Warren York
|
|
|
|
This paper is to show some of the fields of energy associated with
|
|
relativity and reveal new forms of energy which can be derived from
|
|
these fields. Future papers will explain the relationships of these
|
|
forms of energy with the unified field theory and the mechanics
|
|
of relativity.
|
|
|
|
The Silvertooth experiment [1] proves that the Aether exists. The
|
|
nature of the Aether as that of pure energy, flowing like a fluid,
|
|
elastic like a rubber band, and forming a 3-D grid filling all parts
|
|
of space from microcosmic to macrocosmic scales.[2]
|
|
|
|
When stress is placed on the Aether grid free energy is produced
|
|
[3] and the reference point which mankind uses to observe his universe
|
|
shifts.[4] The Aether is responsible for electrostatics,
|
|
electromagnetism, gravity, nucleonic forces, and possibly even the
|
|
mystery of life [5] and consciousness itself. Without the Aether,
|
|
nothing can exist in the universe as man knows of it today.
|
|
|
|
Gravity is an illusion manufactured by the Aether flow orienting
|
|
itself towards the center of a mass. Hence matter behaves like an
|
|
Aether pump. [6] A mass moving with equal speed with the Aether will
|
|
feel no gravitational pull, however when halted in the flow, a
|
|
resulting " Gravitational " field is felt by the mass. This can be
|
|
referred to as Aether pressure. Fig. 1
|
|
|
|
From Fig 1 one can deduct that a " Gravitational Field " increases
|
|
towards the surface of a mass, decreases from the surface towards the
|
|
center of said mass, and that no limitation need be placed upon the
|
|
number of nodal lines depicting Aether pressure since said Aether
|
|
pressure has no mass.
|
|
|
|
If the force of gravity pulling down upon a mass towards the
|
|
center of another mass is an illusion produced by Aether pressure which
|
|
is Aether flow in one direction, then tidal forces and rotation of
|
|
cosmic bodies can be explained.[7]
|
|
|
|
When the Aether flow forms a loop instead of a vector, a magnetic
|
|
field is the result. The direction of the flow of the nodal lines of
|
|
force of a magnetic field is also an illusion, produced by the Aether
|
|
flowing in the opposite direction. See figure 2. [8]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This theory fits the aether model, but remains to be proven. The
|
|
following depiction of an electrostatic field is also subject to the
|
|
same test.
|
|
|
|
In n electron gravity, rotation, magnetic and static fields
|
|
exist.[2] The same should hold true for the proton. The proton cannot
|
|
be ignored in the mechanics of the Aether since it constitutes such a
|
|
large part of the atom.
|
|
|
|
Logically when one affects the electrons surrounding the nucleus
|
|
of an atom, then the nucleus must also be affected. Figure 3 depicts
|
|
the fields associated with an electron.
|
|
|
|
If the poles are reversed for a proton, the equator becoming a
|
|
high and the poles becoming a low, then the Aether flow is reversed,
|
|
causing the proton to act as a sink for the static field and since the
|
|
electron already acts as a source for the static field, an attraction
|
|
results between the electron and proton. [9] See figure 4
|
|
|
|
Without becoming involved any further in the atomic structure of
|
|
the atom, electron flow in a conductor will be reviewed since the
|
|
object of this paper is to map the electromagnetic fields surrounding
|
|
a conductor when a potential is applied.
|
|
|
|
Referring to figure 5 When a potential [c] is placed at the ends
|
|
of conductor [a] the electron [b] begins to accelerate. At this point
|
|
voltage is almost zero, current is very high, power is almost zero,
|
|
resistance is nearly zero and power propogation [h] in the form of
|
|
heat is at the temperature of the rest of the conductor.
|
|
|
|
A magnetic vorticity [n] forms [f] that is centripetal in nature,
|
|
and the Aether [g] forms a centrifugal field. When the electron reaches
|
|
the point of maximum acceleration at the end of vector [d] voltage is
|
|
high, current is low, power is high and resistance is high.
|
|
|
|
Maximum power [s] in the form of heat occurs. Also the electron
|
|
[b] no longer "feels gravity" since acceleration is complete and the
|
|
electron [b] is moving at the same rate as the Aether flowing between
|
|
the potential.
|
|
|
|
When the potential is removed the opposite occurs in all cases
|
|
with the exception of the direction of Aether vorticity. See Fig.6.
|
|
|
|
An Aether vorticity is formed, and the magnetic field becomes
|
|
centrifugal in nature. From this one can see that the right hand rule
|
|
for the Aether vortex is the only apparent constant in time, and active
|
|
when an electron is being accelerated or resisted [10].
|
|
|
|
Taking this into consideration and Aether vacuum forms between
|
|
two conductors when a potential is applied or removed, the potentials
|
|
being in the same direction. See fig. 7.
|
|
|
|
To reiterate the processes of manufacturing a combined Aether
|
|
vorticity a potential [c] is placed at the ends of conductors [a]
|
|
accelerating electron [b] along vector [d] to the point of maximum
|
|
acceleration [e] producing Aether flow vorticity [f] which is
|
|
combining the Aether vorticities of conductors [a] and eliminating
|
|
Aetheric nodal lines of force form between the two conductors producing
|
|
an Aetheric vacuum between the conductors which grows with time
|
|
|
|
Page 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reaching a maximum level at [e] and forming a cone of zero point energy
|
|
[g].
|
|
|
|
The elasticity of the Aether is responsible for moving mass offset
|
|
from the center point between the two conductors as the Aether vacuum
|
|
increases. This can be demonstrated when a third conductor is placed
|
|
between the first two and parallel with the same. Figure 8 is an axial
|
|
view of this process.
|
|
|
|
When electron flow [b] is initiated through conductors [a] the
|
|
Aether vortex flow [c] moves electrons [d] from the center to the edge
|
|
of the middle conductor. This type of current will be called
|
|
reciprocating current, since the electrons oscillate from the center to
|
|
the edge and back again in the middle of the conductor.[12]
|
|
|
|
This reciprocating current is directly related with zero point
|
|
energy discussed earlier and possess a novel effect which is unusual in
|
|
electrical theory but can at least be partially explained with modern
|
|
electrical theory.
|
|
|
|
Fig.9 Demonstrates the effects reciprocating current produces in a
|
|
conductor. As electrons [b] move from the centerf conductor [a] a
|
|
magnetic vortex is formed[c] which constructs a mirror image of itself.
|
|
|
|
A resulting magnetic loop [f] is formed along the edge of the
|
|
conductor [a] which resembles a magnetic monopole when conductor [a] is
|
|
introduced into a complete circuit. The two magnetic loops formed by
|
|
the two electrons are mutually bucking. The center of conductor [a]
|
|
possess a positive charge and the edge is negative.
|
|
|
|
Power dissipation in the form of thermal radiation dissipates
|
|
along the length of the conductor as well in the Y to Z plane. In
|
|
summary, thermal radiation and the magnetic field forms in the Y-Z
|
|
plane, and electrostatic potential forms in the X to Y plane.
|
|
|
|
Note that a capacitor vaguely simulates the same effect, but uses
|
|
a dielectric instead. This process can be partially recreated with
|
|
conventional electricity such as AC or DC, but cannot be completely
|
|
duplicated.
|
|
|
|
The conductor takes on new characteristics, appearing as a super-
|
|
conductor since the electrons never reach their maximum speed and are
|
|
arrested in their paths at the boundary of the conductor.
|
|
|
|
The electrostatic field formed must exist among the entire length
|
|
of the conductor in a circuit,causing the conductor to behave like a
|
|
waveguide. Therefore reciprocating current has minimum power
|
|
dissipation and transfers its energy with a waveguide effect.
|
|
|
|
Towards the center of the conductor on the Y-Z plane the magnetic
|
|
and Aetheric fields cancel, leaving one field accounting for,
|
|
gravitation.
|
|
|
|
Recall the Aether grid, if the Aether is cancelled on the X-Y
|
|
plane and the Y-Z plane, then it still exists on the X-Z plane and
|
|
manifests itself as gravity.
|
|
|
|
Gyroscopic precession can control this element. in Fig. 4 when a
|
|
bucking magnetic vorticity produced in [c] of Fig. 9 encounters the
|
|
|
|
Page 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
poles of either the electron or proton, the electron or proton must
|
|
flip ninety degrees towards the center of attraction between the two.
|
|
|
|
If one flips, the other must also flip to compensate for the
|
|
bucking fields and reach equilibrium. when this occurs, the rotation
|
|
of the mass is arrested and a new direction of rotation begins to
|
|
result.
|
|
|
|
During this period of change gyroscopic precession attempts to
|
|
replace the rotation mass in its former position, resulting in a
|
|
pulling effect, the same force that manifests itself as gravity,
|
|
inertia and centrifugal force.
|
|
|
|
If a larger mass consisting of a great number of atoms were
|
|
subjected to the same process, the effect would constitute all the
|
|
atoms acting as a gyroscope, and the mass in question should draw
|
|
itself back to its former position. This is a crude example of a
|
|
gravitational field generator, [14] a device that forms a difference in
|
|
Aether pressure in a given direction.
|
|
|
|
Fig. 10 demonstrates how a small degree of control can be used
|
|
with these fields to produce specific results. K1 is an adjustable
|
|
relay. L1A, L1B, L2A, and L2B are electromagnets. B1 and B2 are
|
|
bifilar windings in series.
|
|
|
|
A full voltage spike wave is generated by K1. See Fig. 11. On one
|
|
cycle bucking magnetic fields are produced across B1 and reversed for
|
|
B2. On the negative cycle the opposite is true.
|
|
|
|
A reciprocating current occurs across the incandescent bulb. The
|
|
bulb does not give off heat and should possess electrostatic
|
|
properties.
|
|
|
|
A compass placed on the wire should not point perpendicular, but
|
|
parallel with the wire instead. Aetheric pressure would also be felt
|
|
around the wire and incandescent bulb. [15]
|
|
|
|
The primary reason for using bifilar windings is to insure the
|
|
mutual cancellation of electric current and produce a universal
|
|
bucking magnetic field. [11] B1 and B2 yield universal magnetic
|
|
fields. See Fig. 12.
|
|
|
|
Two electromagnets placed end to end does not do the same thing.
|
|
See Fig 13. When the different coils are combined as in Fig. 10 zones
|
|
of zero point energy exist on the X-Z plane, the Y axis and the Y-Z
|
|
plane. This allows for some degree of control of the Aether grid.
|
|
|
|
The incandescent bulb can be replaced by a coil. Another coil for
|
|
the second bifilar winding can be placed on top of the first at a
|
|
ninety degree intersection and the whole wrapped in a torroidial
|
|
fashion [16] See Fig. 14.
|
|
|
|
Upon close examination the scalar fields produced at the
|
|
intersection of the windings results in gyroscopic precession 13 of the
|
|
atoms in all planes of 3D space towards one direction and a
|
|
gravitational field is produced in the given direction. The torroid
|
|
prevents torque from spinning the coil on its axis.
|
|
|
|
When a 3-phase spike wave is introduced to the primaries of the
|
|
|
|
Page 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
separate scalar generators and the three separate torroidial coils
|
|
are stacked like a sandwich [16] a continuous difference in aether
|
|
pressure is produced in a given direction resulting in a constant
|
|
gravitational field in the said direction. See Fig 15 and 16.
|
|
|
|
This is levitation. If a second set of torroidial coils is placed
|
|
adjacent to the first, the gravitational vectors will meet in the
|
|
center. If this is done with all three axis, a strong omnidirectional
|
|
gravitational field will form. See Fig. 17.
|
|
|
|
This is the same thing that occurs naturally in a mass. An intense
|
|
gravitational field will create a singularity at the intersection,
|
|
thus reversing time.
|
|
|
|
The power level, phasing and duration of the activation will
|
|
determine how far back in time [17] the target will travel. This does
|
|
not violate the laws of casualty or relativity.[18]
|
|
|
|
For example, if a dice is thrown, only one of six possible
|
|
outcomes will result. Five other possibilities still exist, and if our
|
|
target subject travels backwards on the world time line to the moment
|
|
the dice was first thrown and throws it again, the possibilities of a
|
|
different outcome are one in five.
|
|
|
|
The same holds true if said target subject travels backwards in
|
|
time and prevents his parents from meeting. In order for this to
|
|
happen, he had to travel back in time. But his genetic structure and
|
|
life history has been altered.
|
|
|
|
The life history of our target subject should eventually lead to
|
|
the construction and operation of the time control device. See Fig. 18.
|
|
|
|
According to this theory, a very high number of alternate
|
|
realities exist with each passing event.
|
|
|
|
In conclusion, it seems to the writer of this paper a humorous
|
|
trick to use a 1.5 volt battery and a wire to shift mankind's reference
|
|
point from one possible reality to another, however these theories are
|
|
open to debate and experimentation.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. E.W. Silvertooth, "Experimental Detection of the Aether",
|
|
Speculations in Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, Pg.3
|
|
May 1986.
|
|
|
|
2. Nikholas J. Medvedeff, Nuclear Dynamics, 1961.
|
|
|
|
3. John C. Bedini, Bedini's Free Energy Generator, Tesla Book
|
|
Company, 1984.
|
|
|
|
4. Warren E. York, "Scalar Wave Technology", Extraordinary
|
|
Science, Jan/Feb/Mar 1990.
|
|
|
|
5. T.J.J. See, " New Wave Theory of the Aether", Astronomische
|
|
Nachrichten, Band 211, Nr. 5044, Pg.51.
|
|
|
|
6. Shinichi Seike, The Principles of Ultra Relativity,
|
|
International Space Research Consortium, 1972.
|
|
|
|
7. William F. Hamilton, Center of the Vortex, Telos Publishing
|
|
Co., 1986.
|
|
|
|
8. Theodor Ernst Bart, Private Correspondence with
|
|
Warren E. York, November 5, 1989.
|
|
|
|
9. Carl F. Krafft, The structure of the Atom, High Energy
|
|
Enterprises, March 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
10. Thomas E. Bearden, Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill
|
|
Press, 1980.
|
|
|
|
11. Moray B. King, Taping the Zero Point Energy, Paraclete
|
|
Publishing, 1989.
|
|
|
|
12. Thomas Commerford Martin, The Inventions, Researches,
|
|
of Nikola Tesla, The Electrical Engineer, 1894.
|
|
|
|
13. Joseph Westley Newmann, The Energy Machine of Joseph Newmann,
|
|
1986.
|
|
|
|
14. Prof. Sinichi Seike, The Principles of Ultrarelativity,
|
|
International Space Research Consortium, Third Edition,
|
|
Ch. 9-3, Pg. 152.
|
|
|
|
15. Eric Dollard and Peter Lindemann, Tesla Longitudial
|
|
Electricity, Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, Video,
|
|
1988.
|
|
|
|
16. Carl Frederick Krafft, Glimpses of the Unseen World, High
|
|
Energy Enterprises, March 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
17. N. A. Kozyrev, Possibility of the Experimental Study of the
|
|
Properties of Time, Joint Publication Research Service,
|
|
May 2, 1968.
|
|
|
|
18. Adrian Berry, The Iron Sun, Crossing the Universe Through
|
|
Black Holes, Warner Books, 1977.
|
|
|
|
Page 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. Dr. Henry C. Monteith, Dynamic Gravity and Electromagnetic
|
|
Processes, July 21, 1987.
|
|
|
|
20. Mel E. Winfield, The Science of Actuality, 1983
|
|
|
|
21. David H. Freedman, "Gravity's Revenge", Discover, May 1990.
|
|
|
|
22. Robert W. Marks, "The New Physics and Chemistry Dictionary
|
|
and Handbook", Bantam Books, Pg. 109, April 1967
|
|
|
|
23. John H. Mauldin, "Particles in Nature", The Chronological
|
|
Discovery of the New Physics,TAB Books, 1968
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
|
|
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard
|
|
Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your
|
|
consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 484-3189
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINIS
|
|
Page 18
|
|
|
|
|