397 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
397 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
June 6, 1993
|
|
|
|
REPLYTVQ.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joe Misiolek.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
06/03/1993
|
|
|
|
An open letter to Mr. T.E. Bearden, and his readers, from members of
|
|
the TVQ group:
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bearden;
|
|
|
|
I am writing to you as a representative of a private research
|
|
collective which has been studying scalar Electromagnetics for
|
|
several years. Members of this group, myself included, have read
|
|
many of your publications with great interest. I personally
|
|
consider your "Toward a New Electromagnetics" series required
|
|
reading for any rational approach to the subject.
|
|
|
|
I was sent a copy of your latest documents downloaded from KeelyNet
|
|
by a fellow member who had some difficulty with the material
|
|
presented. Not having been aware of these files, I eagerly read
|
|
them, but find that I must take issue with several points mentioned
|
|
in the "Secret to Free Energy" papers.
|
|
|
|
First let me state my point of view. I believe in quantum vacuum,
|
|
virtual particles, and over-unity systems. I do not believe in
|
|
electromagnetic waves in a vacuum. I am an engineer by trade, and
|
|
have been successfully designing and building scalar equipment for
|
|
several years. I was introduced (reluctantly) to scalar
|
|
electromagnetics by a researcher whom had come across your earlier
|
|
papers as well as those of Eike Mueller. After some initial
|
|
tinkering, I was rewarded with "interesting" results.
|
|
|
|
From that time our group has grown, as has our collective
|
|
experience. We are about to publish our first in a series of books
|
|
on practical scalar engineering which will include detailed
|
|
diagrams, parts lists, and other construction details for several
|
|
scalar devices. Before we release this publication, we would like
|
|
you to review the designs of the devices we intend to present. We
|
|
wish to end the drought of practical information on scalar
|
|
electromagnetics, and in that light we must address your last
|
|
papers.
|
|
|
|
The statement "Electromagnetic energy is any ordering, either static
|
|
or dynamic, in the virtual photon flux of vacuum." is flawed. Radio
|
|
static and quantum noise are both clearly electromagnetic, but not
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ordered. Both represent a potential, and have "energy". For
|
|
example, the radio engineers nightmare: the transmitter is only
|
|
putting out 10 watts of signal, but 2000 watts of noise.
|
|
|
|
The definition you present would preclude the existence of wide band
|
|
"natural scalar potentials", which are necessary for some of the
|
|
applications mentioned in the "Secret to Free Energy" papers. This
|
|
is the key to the "electronic smog" problems as well as other
|
|
equally rewarding applications.
|
|
|
|
More confusing is the incomplete definition of scalar and vector
|
|
potentials as being static or dynamic respectively. A conductor
|
|
(transmission line) with two electromagnetic standing waves in phase
|
|
is clearly a vector case. Pick almost any two points along that
|
|
line (except two zero crossings) and you will find a difference of
|
|
potential, which is voltage. This is still a static case, in that
|
|
the waves are stationary with respect to the observer.
|
|
|
|
Take the same conductor and place two equal electromagnetic standing
|
|
waves, 180 degrees out of phase, on the line. There will no longer
|
|
be any difference in potential between any two points, but this is
|
|
still a static case. Scalar waves may be static standing waves, or
|
|
a dynamic "scalar current". The distinction between scalar and
|
|
vector is not simply the difference between the static and dynamic
|
|
cases. The difference is simply the geometry of the potential
|
|
vectors which comprise the wave or potential.
|
|
|
|
The definitions presented in this latest paper appear to be at odds
|
|
with those in your earlier papers. This is minor in comparison with
|
|
the grossly incorrect definition of voltage presented. Voltage is
|
|
the difference in electrostatic potential between two points in
|
|
space, nothing more or less. Voltage does not therefore mandate
|
|
current, which is the "dissipation of potential". This definition
|
|
works equally well in the electrostatic case as in the vector
|
|
electric current (dynamic) case.
|
|
|
|
With conventional equipment, we measure this difference in potential
|
|
by placing a known impedance across the potential (vector) and
|
|
measuring the resulting current flow. This is a matter of
|
|
implementation, not physical law, and not the true nature of voltage
|
|
in the electrostatic case.
|
|
|
|
As for the design of the theoretical power generation system
|
|
discussed, there are several critical flaws. First is the two
|
|
circuit, two cycle system as described. If we have a practical
|
|
collector component to which we may apply an electrostatic charge,
|
|
and extract a "current free potential", then there is no need to
|
|
switch the source of charge onto and off of the "collector", and we
|
|
can eliminate one circuit and the critical timing.
|
|
|
|
It is further stated that the "collector" proposed in the papers may
|
|
be a coil or capacitor. If a capacitor were to be used, current
|
|
would be maximum just after the switch closed, and this would negate
|
|
any over-unity operation. With an ideal inductor, current would be
|
|
zero as the switch is closed. This is rather critical for any
|
|
practical implementation.
|
|
|
|
Such a practical collector exists, and we are taught how to
|
|
construct it by reading "Toward a New Electromagnetics, Part 4. On
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page 19, slide 38, we find just such a device. This is a virtual
|
|
particle collector. As presented this device will function, but not
|
|
optimally.
|
|
|
|
A truly practical virtual particle collector would be cylindrical,
|
|
not spherical, to increase the total charge available to the center
|
|
conductor. This modification also provides us with ready made
|
|
virtual particle collectors in the form of coaxial cable. We can
|
|
understand this by examining the construction of a practical
|
|
example.
|
|
|
|
We begin by stripping off the outside copper braid and leaving the
|
|
inner conductor intact at one end of a length of coaxial cable. We
|
|
then push the braid back and cut the inner conductor at the opposite
|
|
end of the cable.
|
|
|
|
The inner conductor is insulated, and the braid is then pulled
|
|
forward closing the braid over the insulated end of the inner
|
|
conductor. We can now charge the braid, and extract a charge free
|
|
potential from the inner conductor at the other end of the cable.
|
|
|
|
Even with this virtual particle collector, Bearden's two cycle
|
|
system is still needed. The virtual particles must be gated into a
|
|
translator, to excite the atoms of the translation matrix.
|
|
|
|
In the second cycle, the switch opens removing the virtual particles
|
|
from the translation matrix, allowing the atoms to drop back to
|
|
their rest states and emitting a real photon for us to keep by the
|
|
process of exophoton emission.
|
|
|
|
In this system we can simplify the second circuit by placing a high
|
|
impedance load directly across the translation matrix. The only
|
|
switching needed now is a single virtual particle flux switch. The
|
|
only penalty for this is that we must insure that we don't
|
|
annihilate particle-antiparticle pairs inside our load impedance as
|
|
this would cause circuit failure.
|
|
|
|
If this switch appears to be a problem, remember that the virtual
|
|
particle flux will flow through conductors just like a vector
|
|
current. The only difference is whether the motion is in the
|
|
electron cloud or the electron cloud's virtual particle flux.
|
|
|
|
Use a switch, like a reed relay. The timing of such a system is
|
|
much less demanding, and the circuit configuration simpler than that
|
|
of the system described in the papers.
|
|
|
|
If we want to get high tech without resorting to mixing up doped
|
|
conductors, we could build virtual particle collectors which utilize
|
|
permanently polarized dialectrics and thereby eliminate the need for
|
|
the charge pump needed to put the real particles onto the collector
|
|
in the first place. All we have to do now is run the switch.
|
|
|
|
In the additional comments to the papers "The Final Secret for Free
|
|
Energy" reference is made to the Floyd Sweet Vacuum Triode. After
|
|
reading some of the material on this device, I was personally
|
|
impressed due to the description of the "programming" process of the
|
|
device for the correct frequency of operation. No details of the
|
|
construction or programming of this device have been uncovered by
|
|
any member of our group.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This process is familiar to members of our group, as the translation
|
|
matrix must be "programmed" in like manner for use in the power
|
|
generation system we describe here.
|
|
|
|
As the translation matrix used in our system is often a gas, we
|
|
apply a DC bias to the gas, and a scalar current is then impressed
|
|
onto the DC bias. By ionizing the gas in this manner we can get the
|
|
electrons out of the way of the nucleus, and thus allow the scalar
|
|
current direct access to the nucleons themselves. This bypasses the
|
|
process of quantum screening of the nucleus by the electron cloud of
|
|
non-ionized matter.
|
|
|
|
We know of no equivalent process for magnetic materials, and this
|
|
casts some doubt on the validity of the Sweet Vacuum Triode. A
|
|
member of the group obtained a video tape of this device in
|
|
operation. This tape showed several disturbing things.
|
|
|
|
First was the demonstration of the magnets placed on the color TV
|
|
screen. The colorful displays produced only tell us of the
|
|
magnetization of the shadow mask within the cathode ray tube, and
|
|
not much of the fields producing that magnetization.
|
|
|
|
Second was that the load received power immediately after the signal
|
|
generator was turned on. The signal generator in question was a
|
|
Hewlett Packard vacuum tube device, and will not output a signal for
|
|
several seconds after power is applied.
|
|
|
|
The "beam" emitted from the quartz-halogen lamp was the clincher.
|
|
The effect is clearly the result of saturating the charge coupled
|
|
image pickup device in the video recorder used. Until these and
|
|
other concerns are addressed, I must consider this device smoke,
|
|
mirrors and vaporware. Check for a ground fault somewhere.
|
|
|
|
There are two methods of power generation described near the end of
|
|
the papers, as well as the undesirable effects attributed to one of
|
|
the two methods. Here again we must take issue, the "time reversed
|
|
effects" described are not the result of using one method or the
|
|
other, but are due to a more subtle cause.
|
|
|
|
The first of the two methods is best summarized as exophoton
|
|
emission, and is the process attributed to the Sweet Vacuum Triode.
|
|
It is a revamped version of the good old exophoton emission
|
|
phenomenon from modern quantum physics, but wrapped in the terms of
|
|
quantum optical theory. This basic process occurs constantly in
|
|
nature without the need for any macroscopic reversed time effects.
|
|
|
|
The second method presented is incomplete, as there is no
|
|
translation process to take the virtual particle flux and translate
|
|
it into photon flux, but we have already gone the long way around
|
|
the barn with the flaws in that one.
|
|
|
|
The cause of the "reversed time effects" is due to another basic
|
|
principal we should have learned from the "Toward a New
|
|
Electromagnetics" series. Scalar resonance will flow along an
|
|
electrostatic gradient. If the system we construct is not balanced
|
|
electrostatically, different parts of the system will take on
|
|
differing charges of this scalar resonance, and choke off the over-
|
|
unity output. It is this process which makes most over-unity
|
|
designs impractical.
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In quantum physics, there is a law of conservation which quarks and
|
|
leptons must obey, which states that these particles must only be
|
|
created or destroyed in particle-antiparticle pairs. Electrons are
|
|
leptons, and therefore must obey this law. This forces us to use
|
|
two virtual particle collectors, and in so doing we
|
|
electrostatically balance the system and avoid any unpleasant side
|
|
effects.
|
|
|
|
Any "free energy" system which causes a resistive load to run cold
|
|
is malfunctioning and should be shut down immediately as a matter of
|
|
safety. Just try to keep warm with one and you will see the point
|
|
here. The goal is to provide pure vector power to the load. If a
|
|
resistive load runs cold, or cooler than when run with conventional
|
|
power sources, then the translation process is suspect.
|
|
|
|
If we pollute the space-time that our virtual lepton fed generator
|
|
is operating in with lots of unhappy virtual antileptons, something
|
|
is going to give. This must be avoided. The virtual antileptons
|
|
will pinch off the flow of virtual leptons and the system will stop,
|
|
or suffer performance degradation at least.
|
|
|
|
As far as good conductors being the bane of over unity inventors,
|
|
surely you're joking, Mr. Bearden. How could you possibly recommend
|
|
constructing any scalar system with less than perfect materials?
|
|
Should a circuit connection or component fail while a large scalar
|
|
resonance charge is present, the consequences could be most severe.
|
|
This scenario has already been explored in earlier papers on the
|
|
subject.
|
|
|
|
If the current dearth of practical how-to information on scalar
|
|
technology is any indication of the level of effort being expended
|
|
on this subject, then we are in most serious trouble. I would
|
|
prefer to believe that there are accomplished researchers who, for
|
|
whatever reasons, are not sharing their results.
|
|
|
|
In that hope, our group has collectively decided to put our cards on
|
|
the table in order to stimulate cooperative collaboration.
|
|
|
|
It should be clear that in the current situation, the
|
|
commercialization of scalar technology is impractical. This will
|
|
continue to be the case until we begin to build on the foundations
|
|
of others' work, with a common set of terms, just as in the
|
|
beginnings of our current electromagnetic technologies.
|
|
|
|
We would treasure an opportunity to discuss the details of these and
|
|
other systems with you, or any other readers before we commit our
|
|
manuscript to print. Our current plan is to put the detailed
|
|
construction plans for the power generation system we have described
|
|
here in the second volume of our books. If we create the desired
|
|
effect with the publication of the first book, then it may be
|
|
released as a free supplement to the first book.
|
|
|
|
In closing, we would like to offer you (and everyone else who reads
|
|
this) the opportunity to discuss these issues at length. You may
|
|
contact the group (TVQ) through our liazon here on KeelyNet.
|
|
|
|
All the Best,
|
|
|
|
TVQ Group
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All E-Mail should be sent to the account of: Joseph J. Misiolek
|
|
here at KeelyNet. Phone conversations and face-to-face meetings
|
|
can also be arranged.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard note...
|
|
|
|
As usual, Joe and the TVQ group will NO DOUBT stir up quite a lot
|
|
of interest ESPECIALLY if they come out with a book or other
|
|
practical circuits that will allow anyone to build and test the
|
|
scalar and F/E principles.
|
|
|
|
The idea of using a BALANCED set of virtual collectors is an
|
|
interesting approach to cancelling out the alleged EM SMOG which
|
|
is generated in the vicinity of a hyperspatial F/E generator. We
|
|
had assumed Bearden was thinking of using phasing, i.e.
|
|
enharmonic or destructive intereference to rid the local area of
|
|
noxious emissions.
|
|
|
|
In a way, the balanced set correlates with the TESTATIKA machine
|
|
since it uses two of everything and is based on the "respiration"
|
|
of energy in the universe. That is, everything "breathes" in a
|
|
continual in and out motion. By properly tapping this motion, in
|
|
either direction, energy can thus be "tapped".
|
|
|
|
And, the higher order researchers such as John Keely, Walter
|
|
Russell and Victor Schauberger (for starters) understood this
|
|
universal respiration cycle and that it could be tapped for a
|
|
"hot/focussing" or "cold/expanding" effect in matter or energy.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the EM SMOG cancellation using the dual virtual
|
|
collectors, it appears to be tapped for the positive and negative
|
|
flows, thus naturally achieving an "undisturbed environment".
|
|
The essence of true ecology.
|
|
|
|
We here at KeelyNet are most interested in this approach to the
|
|
generation of free energy and everyone will be slavering in
|
|
anticipation of the comments and other responses...come on Joe,
|
|
send us some circuits.....don't tease...
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|