241 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
241 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : PARADIGM.ASC | Online Date : 10/15/94 |
|
|
| Contributed by : John Peters | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
Fate magazine has been in existence for many years and covers a wide range of
|
|
subjects, much like KeelyNet. If you might be interested in subscribing to
|
|
this interesting journal, their mailing address, etc..is:
|
|
|
|
FATE
|
|
PO BOX 64383
|
|
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0383
|
|
|
|
Phone - 612-291-0383
|
|
____________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
THE AURA PARADIGM by Michael Baran
|
|
____________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
This article appeared in May 1990 edition of FATE Magazine.
|
|
____________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Some observers believe that the controversial devices that claim to produce
|
|
more energy than they consume may actually operate on ambient free energy -- a
|
|
form of energy existing all around us, the nature of which has been eluding
|
|
our scientists. Most free energy researchers are outside the mainstream
|
|
science, which still denies the existence of such energy.
|
|
|
|
The controversial Joseph Newman is a Mississippi inventor who designed a
|
|
mechanical engine which allegedly produces more energy than it uses. He has
|
|
been trying for years to get a patent on it without success (presumably
|
|
because no logical theory exists to explain it). A similar claim regarding
|
|
energy production/consumption was made by researchers in Utah and England, who
|
|
explained their device by claiming they had achieved fusion of atomic nuclei
|
|
at room temperature--"cold fusion"--which, if true, would open the way to
|
|
tapping the nearly limitless energy inside the atom. Their claim was later
|
|
discounted by the scientific world.
|
|
|
|
(as of 1994, cold fusion has been successfully replicated hundreds of times
|
|
and work is ongoing in many countries, especially Japan...Vanguard)
|
|
|
|
I believe that non-fraudulent devices which claim to produce more energy
|
|
than they would use could operate by tapping into ambient MACROSCOPIC energy
|
|
(here at Earth's surface, "Earth energy"). Such machines would resonate, or
|
|
"tune into," an energy that exists all around us, and draw in that energy.
|
|
|
|
The free-energy field today is as much of a free-for-all as it ever was.
|
|
Researchers continue to come up with free-energy devices, "healing energy"
|
|
crystals, and the like. Each researcher has his or her own theory for how
|
|
they work, with no two theorists agreeing. Joe Newman claims his device works
|
|
via the action of energy-particles which he calls "gyrotrons." These have
|
|
properties not known to science. A similar device, designed by a German named
|
|
Hans Nieper, supposedly uses gravitational forces. But there has been no
|
|
wide-ranging theoretical model (paradigm) able to address the important
|
|
scientific questions and the anomalous energy phenomena. And, of course,
|
|
there are no systematic experimental protocols for testing such a paradigm.
|
|
|
|
The lack of interest shown by most physicists toward these anomalous
|
|
products may not be justified. Despite its many accomplishments in
|
|
electronic/magnetic technology, physics still lacks a clear understanding of
|
|
magnetism and gravitation, and physicists might be expected to have some
|
|
interest in examining alternative avenues that may have a bearing on more
|
|
common, recognized energy systems. Perhaps energy systems as they exist in
|
|
nature are fundamentally different in some way from the technological systems
|
|
our scientists use and upon which they base their theories.
|
|
|
|
What about psychic and other paranormal phenomena, such as spontaneous human
|
|
combustion? Do they involve the same "mystery energy" as free-energy devices.
|
|
Orthodox science still doesn't admit the reality of paranormality--a posture
|
|
that doesn't carry very well with the substantial number of people who believe
|
|
they have experienced or witnessed unquestionable instances of telepathic and
|
|
other paranormal phenomena.
|
|
|
|
Telepathy is a common psychic theme. The clarity and definition of
|
|
telepathic mental images over vast distances indicates that such transmissions
|
|
must travel via a medium with virtually infinite features.
|
|
|
|
Another psychic theme is metal bending. I personally know of sessions in
|
|
which novices are taught to psychically bend metal utensils.
|
|
|
|
THE 'AURA' PARADIGM
|
|
|
|
An "aura" paradigm of energy would be very attractive for explaining these
|
|
kinds of phenomena. According to this model, all solid objects--including
|
|
humans and metallic objects--would have auric energy fields. The energy waves
|
|
of two dissimilar objects, when resonating with each other (as when you "tune
|
|
in" your radio to a specific radio station's frequency) react with each other.
|
|
|
|
Auric energy could be associated with or attached to the tiny particles
|
|
comprising matter, so that auric energy would exist within as well as near
|
|
solid bodies. An object like a spoon could be affected by auric energy
|
|
transmissions resonating at the frequency of the spoon's aura and that comes
|
|
from another body--such as that of a human.
|
|
|
|
THE NATURE OF AURIC ENERGY
|
|
|
|
The fact that science has not delineated such an energy up to now suggests
|
|
that auric energy, if it exists, would have to consist of energy transmissions
|
|
of a different nature than the atomic particles thus far characterized by
|
|
physics--electrons, neutrons, and so on. The medium of auric energy
|
|
transmissions would necessarily have to be of the same nature--a kind of
|
|
super-fine ether composed of tiny particle-units. It would be a medium that
|
|
theoretically could allow transmissions of a more dynamic and precise nature
|
|
than the kinds of energy systems used by science. This theoretical medium
|
|
would allow for phenomena with virtually infinite ranges and other features as
|
|
described in the literature of psychic phenomena.
|
|
|
|
In the 1920s, when Einstein's theory of gravity was that of a U.S. Navy
|
|
scientist named T.J.J. See, who proposed that gravity arises from a wave-
|
|
effect in a universal ether. See's model was endorsed by Edgar Cayce and
|
|
Nikola Tesla. See pointed out that energy waves, such as light waves, become
|
|
wider (their amplitude increases) the closer they are to a heavenly body like
|
|
Earth. He proposed that gravity waves, magnetic waves, and all other waves
|
|
must do so also. His model of gravity involved the concept of a "vacuum"
|
|
created in the ether by the widening of "waves of force" near to a body like
|
|
Earth. (See did not explain why waves widen close to a body.)
|
|
|
|
The aura model supplies the missing link in See's model. To understand how
|
|
this would work, one first would have to see how this aura theory applies to
|
|
magnetism on a planet like Earth and planetary magnetic fields.
|
|
|
|
THE SECRET OF GRAVITY
|
|
|
|
In an aura model of energy, the massive Earth has the controlling or
|
|
"parent" aura. All smaller auras, like that of humans, metals, etc. acquire a
|
|
variety of features (such as magnetism) as they resonate with Earth's
|
|
surrounding energies (magnet-type directionality is a pervasive theme in
|
|
psychic phenomena, such as telepathy, metal bending, dowsing, etc.). The aura
|
|
model of energy must focus on Earth magnetism.
|
|
|
|
The aura model leads to a much simpler model of Earth magnetism than the
|
|
currently accepted model. The latter is based on a complicated series of
|
|
hypothetical radioactive and other processes in the central core, 2,000 miles
|
|
down. In an aura model, Earth's three layers--core, surface crust, and
|
|
intervening mantle--would each emit a vast auric energy field from its huge
|
|
mass, and the three fields would resonate with each other to produce the
|
|
planetary energy field. The magnetism of this field (Earth's magnetic field)
|
|
results from the way these field resonations occur. Physicists call this
|
|
linear resonation.
|
|
|
|
This vast auric energy, close to a heavenly body such as Earth, would
|
|
include a large quantity of magnetized or auric energy particles. The ether
|
|
in space would be relatively nonmagnetized when compared to the aura of a
|
|
planet. Therefore, the energy of the auric particles of the ether in space
|
|
will be different form the energy of the particles when the ether approaches a
|
|
body such as a planet.
|
|
|
|
See pointed out that if an ether exists, the elastic power must be enormous
|
|
because it would have a stupendous number of minuscule particles. It would
|
|
exert more force in space than close to a cosmic body, where the ether "thins
|
|
out" and where wave transmissions "widen out."
|
|
|
|
The aura model contends that solid bodies' atoms are in a constant flux,
|
|
continuously emitting and absorbing very fine auric-energy particles. Thus,
|
|
close to a solid body, the ether particles would be modified (magnetized) by
|
|
their interactions with the atoms and auric influences of the bodies. The
|
|
ether would thin out. Etheric particles would combine into larger units like
|
|
atoms, resulting in a smaller number of larger particles. In space, the ether
|
|
would consist of a much larger number of smaller particles. The latter would
|
|
be much more forceful, gravitationally.
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSION
|
|
|
|
The kind of cosmic model one is finally led to by the aura/ether concept is
|
|
one of a dense ether out in space exerting powerful gravitational force toward
|
|
cosmic bodies, where the ether is thinned out by resonating with the atoms of
|
|
the bodies. This cosmic model is much simpler than the accepted model. Many
|
|
believe that the simplest model which explains all phenomena is the best one,
|
|
making the auric model more compelling than those that postulate multiple
|
|
forces and multiple dimensions, and deny the existence of auric forces.
|
|
|
|
Newton's mathematical formula for the force of gravity--gravity being
|
|
inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two objects--
|
|
suggests that gravity is a single, simple force. Gravity, as mathematically
|
|
defined by Newton and Einstein, does not mix with rest of particle/energy
|
|
theory, so physicists have been postulating additional forces to make it fit.
|
|
The true solution may lie elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Only recently have we become aware of the energies contained within the
|
|
planet. Gravity, the magnetic field, and the radioactivity in the earth all
|
|
required that instruments be invented before they could be measured. The
|
|
purpose of this article has been to present rationale for the existence of
|
|
auric forces not yet perceived by science, and to suggest that we ought to
|
|
think of our world as comprising not just objects but auras.
|
|
_________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Observations by John W. Peters:
|
|
|
|
1. The author mentions that T.J.J. See didn't explain why energy waves widen
|
|
out near heavenly bodies. My idea is that See viewed waves of energy
|
|
encountering physical bodies like radio waves encountering a tuned
|
|
circuit; the circuit tends to collect and amplify signals at the
|
|
circuit's resonant frequency. Since the tuned circuit extracts RF from
|
|
the surrounding medium and concentrates it within itself, the nearby
|
|
surrounding medium becomes deficient in electromagnetic energy at the
|
|
circuit's frequency; hence the medium is less full (a partial vacuum) of
|
|
energy at that frequency.
|
|
|
|
2. The rationale given in Observation #1 easily explains the existence of
|
|
both low-density (outer space) and high-density (physical) regions in our
|
|
universe due to absences and concentrations of energy.
|
|
|
|
3. The article does seem to offer a plausible explanation for various types
|
|
of phenomena.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|