112 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
112 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : MRATLDYN.ASC | Online Date : 10/28/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Joel McClain | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
|
|
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following document is taken from .PCX images uploaded to KeelyNet by Joel
|
|
which show verification of the MRA as an overunity device in a test conducted
|
|
by Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical. This is the first and only MRA confirmation
|
|
that has been uploaded to KeelyNet. The files take four forms :
|
|
|
|
MRATLDYN.ASC - contains ASCII text of page 1 and page 2 of the .PCX images
|
|
|
|
MRATLDN1.GIF - page 1 with the Teledyne header
|
|
MRATLDN2.GIF - page 2 with the Teledyne header
|
|
MRATLDN3.GIF - circuit layout and test setups
|
|
|
|
MRATLDN.ZIP - all of the above files are bundled into one master file
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Teledyne
|
|
Ryan Aeronautical
|
|
2701 N. Harbor Drive
|
|
PO BOX 84311
|
|
San Diego, CA 92186-5311
|
|
(619) 291-7311 FAX (619) 250-5400
|
|
|
|
Letter of Cerfification
|
|
|
|
26 September 1995
|
|
329/95-07/REE
|
|
|
|
To : Karel Taylor, OPS
|
|
P.O. Box 461793
|
|
Escondido, CA 92046
|
|
(Taylor Construction 404-587-3454)
|
|
|
|
From : Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical
|
|
Engineering Environmental Laboratory
|
|
2701 Harbor Drive
|
|
P.O. Box 85311
|
|
San Diego, CA 82186-5311
|
|
|
|
Subject : Measurement Verification
|
|
|
|
References : (a) Telecon, 18 September 1995, K. Taylor and R. Chalmers of TRA
|
|
(b) TAR Quote ENV 4248
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
One (1) MRA S/N 95-3 was setup for demonstration and measurement verification
|
|
on 25 September 1995. The demonstration and measurements were performed at
|
|
the Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical (TRA) Engineering Environmental Laboratory
|
|
located in San Diego, California.
|
|
|
|
The demonstration was conducted by Robert Taylor and the measurement
|
|
verification was performed by Ed Everett of Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical. The
|
|
MRA demonstration and measurement verification was conducted according to
|
|
customer direction. No written plan/guideline was provided. A chronological
|
|
record of the event was maintained and is identified as TR 3715. The test log
|
|
was used as the basis of this report and a copy of this log is presented as
|
|
Attachment A. A copy of the equipment list is also included as Attachment B.
|
|
A short discussion of the measurements made is provided below.
|
|
|
|
Discussion
|
|
|
|
The customer setup the MRA as shown in Figure 1. Using his own signal
|
|
generator, power amplifier and measurement meter, the customer demonstrated
|
|
the MRA to his visitors. After his demonstration and discussion, the MRA
|
|
circuit was connected to a TRA RF signal generator, (Rohde & Schwarz model
|
|
845.4002.44), as shown in Figure 2. The following conditions/assumptions
|
|
apply:
|
|
a) The MRA was treated as a Black Box with an input (A & B) and an
|
|
output (D & E).
|
|
b) The input circuit was considered a series circuit i.e. the current
|
|
flow R1 & R2 represents the total input current.
|
|
c) No examination of the MRA was made other than a cursory visual
|
|
inspection of the exterior.
|
|
|
|
Using a TRA oscilloscope, (Tektronix model 2205), the following measurements
|
|
were made:
|
|
|
|
1) The signal generator was set to 91.412 Khz per the customer, and the
|
|
output was turned up to the maximum level.
|
|
2) The input to the MRA (points A to B) was measured and found to be 0.085
|
|
Volts peak (Vpk), or 0.060 Volts RMS, (Vrms).
|
|
3) The voltage across R1 & R2 (B to C) was measured next and found to be
|
|
0.125 Vpk (0.088 Vrms).
|
|
4) The input current was then calculated per the customer as the voltage
|
|
(rms) across R1 & R2 divided by the resistance of R1 + R2. This yields
|
|
0.3 uAmps.
|
|
5) The output voltage across R3 (D & E) was measured and found to be 0.015
|
|
Vpk (0.0106 Vrms).
|
|
6) The output current through R3 was calculated per the customer as the
|
|
voltage (rms) across R3 divided by the resistance of R3. This yields
|
|
10.6 uAmps.
|
|
7) The customer defines the MRA gain as the output voltage (rms) D to E
|
|
times the output current through R3 divided by the input voltage (rms) A
|
|
to B times the input current through R1 & R2.
|
|
|
|
This yields (0.0106 X 10.6 X 10 to the minus 6th) = 6.2
|
|
|
|
8) The customer removed the input to the MRA at points A & B. The output
|
|
across R3 was measured again and was found to be approximately 1 to 2
|
|
millivolts of noise.
|
|
|
|
The frequency of all voltages measured was 91.412 Khz except for step 8 which
|
|
was random noise.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|