199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
||
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
||
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
||
|
||
December 24, 1992
|
||
|
||
MAGALT.ASC
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
This file is based on personal information from Mr. Lee Jones.
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Vangard Note
|
||
|
||
I had a recent phone conversation with an interesting fellow in
|
||
which he spoke of a "free energy" device that he had heard of.
|
||
|
||
He heard it from a friend who had seen it while on a tour of duty
|
||
during the Viet Nam War. This file is presented on KeelyNet in
|
||
two forms : MAGALT.ASC - this ASCII text ONLY
|
||
MAGALT1.ZIP - the ASCII text and the MAGALT1.GIF
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
In Lee's own words
|
||
|
||
Here's the best I can remember of what I heard from a good
|
||
friend. He was in Viet Nam during the time when "tourism" was at
|
||
it's worst. <joke> There was a need for a quiet way to make
|
||
electricity (in a jungle environment where noise would show the
|
||
presence of enemies to the Viet Cong)
|
||
|
||
Someone on a NAVY ship figured this design out during a long
|
||
boring trip at sea. The discs (see MAGALT1.GIF) were from some
|
||
kind of ship's motor or generator and when spun they continued to
|
||
do so, causing the alternators attached to them to turn and make
|
||
lots of AC current.
|
||
|
||
His description as far as I can remember is presented in the .GIF
|
||
file. Now, you must understand he is NOT an engineer and his
|
||
description of what he saw may not be corect. For example..the
|
||
"alternators" attached to the magnetic discs might not have been
|
||
alternators but some kind of device that changed the energy that
|
||
traveled down the shafts connecting them to the magnets.
|
||
|
||
What I'm saying is that this is a VERY limited starting point
|
||
from which to attempt to reverse engineer this device. I'm sorry
|
||
but this is the best I can do.
|
||
|
||
He said the Alternators were wired together and that the only
|
||
time the machine stopped working was when the discs got out of
|
||
sync and had to be restarted by aligning a mark on each disc and
|
||
giving them both a spin toward each other from the top.
|
||
|
||
I assume the discs were eccentrically mounted but this is not
|
||
absolute nor is anything else...beg apology... I tried my best
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
to obtain more info about this design but was unsuccessful. As I
|
||
said he wasn't an engineer and didn't understand what he was
|
||
looking at, other than the obvious; that it was producing power
|
||
without fuel!! He said that there was a fellow in Oregon
|
||
someplace that had built one of these but didn't want anything to
|
||
do with anyone about it.
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Vangard note
|
||
|
||
I might add some of what Lee told me on the phone that would
|
||
further clarify the machine and its operation. The basic
|
||
description of the machine was that it consisted of two identical
|
||
units that were placed next to each other. Each had a magnetic
|
||
disk that was about 3 feet in diameter and from 2 to 3 inches
|
||
thick.
|
||
|
||
Each magnetic disk was mounted on the shaft of the generator
|
||
which when spun caused the generation of current. It would seem
|
||
the weight of the disks caused them to function as flywheels
|
||
with the magnetic field giving a push or pull at the right time.
|
||
(I thought he said on the phone that the disks spun on a vertical
|
||
axis but the drawing (MAGALT1.GIF) refutes that.)
|
||
|
||
He said each of the generators provided EQUAL amounts of energy
|
||
and that the energy that was drawn from each unit must be
|
||
MIRRORED by the other. That is, when one generator was drawn on
|
||
for more power than the other, the unequal loading would cause
|
||
the spinning flywheel magnets to lose their sync and rotate to a
|
||
halt.
|
||
|
||
Each disk had a reference mark that would remain in sync as long
|
||
as the disks spun. The means of starting the wheels to spinning
|
||
was to grab both disks and pull at the same time. They would
|
||
then begin to spin and eventually achieve a stable rotation.
|
||
(Much like how the Testatika machine is started and achieves ITS
|
||
OWN RESONANT velocity!)
|
||
|
||
Lee also said that his source mentioned that the disks were
|
||
slightly off-balance due to being mounted on an eccentric. As I
|
||
understood it during the phone conversation (and now looking at
|
||
the .GIF image) he indicated the disks got closest to each other
|
||
WHEN THE SYNC MARK came around.
|
||
|
||
If the polarization was on the north half of the disk (imagine a bar
|
||
magnet in the center of the disk, and there could be more than one)
|
||
with the south being on the opposite half, it would then provide the
|
||
maximum polar repulsion as the disks came into contact at the
|
||
closest eccentric proximity point.
|
||
|
||
Since like poles REPEL, then one can see how the axis of the north
|
||
OR south pole would have the greatest force while the equator would
|
||
provide the least due to field cancellation.
|
||
|
||
As it rotated around, the repulsion would gradually DECREASE as it
|
||
approached the equator (90 degrees from the pole). On passing the
|
||
equator, the velocity from the repulsion of the last orbit would
|
||
continue to drive the disk through the INCREASING repulsion of the
|
||
opposite south pole, though at a much LESSER INTENSITY because of
|
||
the greater distance between the poles. (this is the trick, how to
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
overcome that increasing replusion to cause the disk to go over the
|
||
"hump")
|
||
|
||
This means that when the sync lines that were drawn on each disk
|
||
were lined up, the disks would be CLOSEST to one another. 180
|
||
degrees from that point, the opposite sync lines would mean the
|
||
disks would be at the GREATEST distance due to the eccentric.
|
||
|
||
So, with the addition of the eccentric rotation (which Lee said was
|
||
about 1/4" distance at the closest point of the disks, the closer
|
||
the better) then the REPULSION WOULD BE GREATEST when the axis of
|
||
each pole lined up. For those without graphics capabilities, I have
|
||
included an ASCII equivalent drawing so you can get an idea of the
|
||
machine.
|
||
least repulsion
|
||
at neutral magnetic equator
|
||
|
||
3 foot wide disk 3 foot wide disk
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ 2-3"
|
||
<20> magnetic disk ͵Sync<6E><63> magnetic disk <20> thick
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>mark<72><6B><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ
|
||
<20> <20> eccentric<69> <20>
|
||
Generator <20> <20> mounted <20> <20> Generator
|
||
One <20> <20> on shaft <20> <20> Two
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD> <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
|
||
shown at farthest proximity
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
greatest repulsion at poles
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ<EFBFBD><C4BF><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ
|
||
sync mark<72><6B> S N <20><> N S ͵ sync mark
|
||
180 out <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD> 180 out
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ŀ
|
||
<20> <20> <20> <20>
|
||
Generator <20> <20> <20> <20> Generator
|
||
One <20> <20> <20> <20> Two
|
||
<20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD> <20><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
|
||
shown at closest proximity
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
One more point that Lee said on the phone, though I might be
|
||
mistaken. As I remember the conversation, he said he thought the
|
||
disks might have been slightly tilted (on the horizontal axis).
|
||
|
||
If there was a weight added to one side of the disk, probably at the
|
||
sync mark, then that might give an additional impetus to accelerate
|
||
the rotation to overcome the increasing repulsion on the "uptake".
|
||
|
||
The machine would appear to operate on a very common principle
|
||
associated with most perpetual motion devices. Most machines are
|
||
lucky to achieve 60% efficiency. 100% would be unity and anything
|
||
over that would be overunity. The idea with overunity is for the
|
||
machine to be able to provide enough energy to sustain its operation
|
||
in a closed system. Anything beyond what that takes would thus be
|
||
"free energy." We would appreciate your comments on this matter.
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Page 3
|
||
|
||
|