397 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
397 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet!
|
|
|
|
August 19, 1991
|
|
|
|
KEW.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Jim Schaffer.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEWs) verses Lorentz - 05/20/88
|
|
|
|
For those of you who may have just tuned in, you may be wondering
|
|
why, we are discussing Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEWs for short) here.
|
|
It started with my question on which issue of "The American
|
|
Rifleman", had info on a Railgun (Does any one know the issue?).
|
|
|
|
I'll speculate that mention of Railguns was prompted by the article
|
|
in Circuit Cellar Ink #2, "Circuit Cellar Neighborhood Strategic
|
|
Defense Initiative [,] The Ballistic Dynamics of Plastic Soda
|
|
Bottles" by Steve Ciarcia & Ed Nisley. So here we are at:
|
|
|
|
"Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEWs) verses Lorentz".
|
|
|
|
Also related is the 'thread' of messages on making the Plastic Soda
|
|
Bottle into a capacitor, and charging it to a high voltage potential
|
|
to increase lift, without increasing fuel.
|
|
|
|
Its taken me a lot longer to get this message composed that I
|
|
thought it would, some of the references, to say the least, are
|
|
obscure, and took time to find them.
|
|
|
|
I want to explain some things here, I am not a physicist, nor have I
|
|
had any formal education in such areas. I simply have a desire to
|
|
read things that most people politely term esoteric and ignore with
|
|
out further thought. My desire to read the esoteric has resulted in
|
|
my accumulation of a rather large collection of odds-and-ends that
|
|
"don't fit in" with accepted physical "Laws", for example: Railgun
|
|
verses Lorentz.
|
|
|
|
The one common tread that runs between all of these odds-and-ends,
|
|
is that there are usually some 'anomalies' to each of the "Laws",
|
|
that the "Law" itself does not account for, at some scale. My view
|
|
is that if it is a "Law" it should work no matter what the scale,
|
|
from microscopic to macroscopic. As an example, Lorentz's law
|
|
didn't break down until someone tried to use macroscopic currents in
|
|
a Railgun.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are the specific references to Kinetic Energy Weapons :
|
|
|
|
[Any one know where I can get more of such info?]
|
|
|
|
1) "Railgun Research Shoots Holes In Lorentz's Theory": pg 49;
|
|
"Railgun Research Shoots Holes In Lorentz Law Of
|
|
Electromagnetism": pg 50; by Chappell Brown;
|
|
Electronic Engineering Times
|
|
Monday, April 6, 1987 pg 49
|
|
|
|
2) "Anomalies In Electromagnetic Law Spur Debate" pg 58, by
|
|
Chappell Brown; Electronic Engineering Times
|
|
Monday, September 14, 1987.
|
|
|
|
3) "Electrons And Conduction: Not So Simple After All": pg 21;
|
|
"Lorentz No Longer Gives Answers Ampere's Theory Holds Clues
|
|
to Current Problem": pg 22, by Chappell Brown,
|
|
Electronic Engineering Times,
|
|
Monday, December 28, 1987
|
|
|
|
4) "Debate Over Use Of Energy Weapons Thrives" pg 41, by ?
|
|
Van Nostrand; Electronic Engineering Times,
|
|
Monday, September 7, 1987
|
|
|
|
5) "Dusting Off An Old Idea: Shooting Into Orbit": pg 37,
|
|
by Chappell Brown; Electronic Engineering Times,
|
|
Monday, August 31, 1987
|
|
|
|
6) Defense Electronics, May 1988 Vol. 20, #5, "SDI: More Spin-
|
|
Offs Than Apollo?" Pg 39-45, by J.W.R
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From Ref #2:
|
|
|
|
"It is important to realize that the mismatch between theory
|
|
and observation is not some barely discernible quantity.
|
|
[It] involves factors in the thousands."
|
|
|
|
So says Peter Graneau, a Physicist at Northeastern
|
|
University's Center of Electromagnetics Research, commenting
|
|
on anomalies in Lorentz's force law. "The situation is more
|
|
than academic bickering, since the formula is one of the
|
|
pillars of relativity theory."
|
|
|
|
"Graneau has shown that objects move, buckle and break under
|
|
forces that are not found in current electromagnetic
|
|
equations."
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From Ref #3:
|
|
|
|
"...the Ampere and Lorentz laws only agree for closed
|
|
circuits. When the source of the electromagnetic effect
|
|
is an isolated current element, a large discrepancy appears."
|
|
|
|
"Amperean forces also explain the wire fragmentation that
|
|
occurs at high currents. Current-element analysis also
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
explains the existence of the longitudinal electromagnetic
|
|
waves that were observed by Radio pioneer Nikola Tesla.
|
|
Because such waves cannot be derived from Maxwell's
|
|
equations, Tesla's experiments were ignored..."
|
|
[Or were they actively suppressed? See the references
|
|
referring to T. E. Bearden, and Scalar waves.]
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From ref #5:
|
|
|
|
"A physicist [Peter Graneau] at Northeastern University has
|
|
found that current pulses in water can develop strong forces
|
|
which, when contained in a gun barrel, produce unprecedented
|
|
muzzle velocities."
|
|
|
|
"...Northeastern's new electromagnetics research center has
|
|
uncovered a new 'electrodynamic' phenomenon, dubbed the
|
|
"alpha torque," that only manifests itself in liquid
|
|
conductors like air, water and molten metals. The results
|
|
show that the new method of propulsion can easily out-perform
|
|
both chemical explosives and electromagnetic rail guns."
|
|
|
|
"The crucial issue is how electric arcs generate these forces
|
|
in fluids. We have given up on thermodynamic explanations.
|
|
Ruling out gravitational and nuclear forces, there really
|
|
remains no choice but to seek an electrodynamic explanation,"
|
|
|
|
"Graneau calculates that a 2-million-amp arc explosion in a
|
|
350-meter barrel would accelerate a 20-kg projectile to 13 km
|
|
per second."
|
|
|
|
"Graneau has had to resurrect an older formulation of
|
|
electromagnetic theory in order to explain the arc
|
|
explosions. The theory was originated by the French
|
|
physicist Andre-Marie Ampere at the beginning of the 19th
|
|
century and was further elaborated by A. F. Neuman in
|
|
Germany."
|
|
|
|
In the modern formulation, the Lorentz formula governs the
|
|
movement of electrons in electromagnetic fields.
|
|
|
|
"Applying the Lorentz formula to the water arc experiments
|
|
leads to an entirely different prediction of the propagated
|
|
forces. A much smaller force acting to contain the plasma
|
|
was predicted, and this helped derail applications of arc
|
|
forces."
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Here are a few notes of my own.
|
|
|
|
Lightning is an arc force. So what are some useful things we can do
|
|
with it? The projectiles that are fired by KEWs must survive, and
|
|
maintain there aerodynamic properties, when they impact with the air
|
|
at the end of their muzzles.
|
|
|
|
Firing a bullet at 10 km per second into air, would be like driving
|
|
your car into a brick wall at 1000 mph; instant pan-cake. Some type
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of ceramic material would probably be the best avenue to pursue for
|
|
the projectile.
|
|
|
|
Can we pick up some distilled water, or maybe mineral water (a good
|
|
point to experiment with), at the super market, a few dozen 300,000
|
|
uF caps at a hamfest, and make our own arc force powered 'Plastic
|
|
Soda Bottle' launcher, without blowing ourself up?
|
|
|
|
I brought up (a)ether, and you brought up Michelson/Morley
|
|
experiment, so lets see where we can go with that:
|
|
|
|
This is what my dictionary has to say about (a)ether:
|
|
|
|
E-ther: Noun.
|
|
|
|
1) Chem. a.) A colorless, mobile, volatile,
|
|
aromatic liquid compound, ethyl oxide,
|
|
(C2H5)2O, made by the action of sulfuric
|
|
acid on alcohol: used as an anesthetic
|
|
and solvent.
|
|
|
|
b.) Any of a group of organic compounds in
|
|
which an oxygen atom is joined with two
|
|
organic radicals.
|
|
|
|
2) A solid or semi-solid, perfectly elastic medium
|
|
formerly [?] assumed to pervade all of space and to
|
|
be responsible for the transmission of light, heat,
|
|
gravitational effects, and all forms of energy and
|
|
radiation.
|
|
|
|
3) The upper air.
|
|
|
|
Also spelled "AETHER" (for defs. 2 and 3).
|
|
|
|
[<L aether sky <Gk. aither < aithein burn, shine]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll go with the 'aether' spelling from here on out, so that the
|
|
"aromatic liquid" of definition number one (1) doesn't smell up the
|
|
place.
|
|
|
|
The Michelson/Morley experiment, of 1881 and 1887, proved that
|
|
aether didn't exist? Well you are correct; almost. M&M set out to
|
|
prove, or disprove, that the "perfectly elastic [static] medium
|
|
assumed to pervade all of space" did, or did not, exist. Or to put
|
|
it an other way, since it was believed the aether was stationary in
|
|
space, which the Earth passed through, there would be an aether
|
|
'wind'.
|
|
|
|
The M&M experiment did virtually prove for certain that a static
|
|
aether, or aether wind, DID NOT exist. Did I just shoot myself in
|
|
the foot, when I said aether did not exist? No, I didn't, I said
|
|
they proved that a STATIC aether (or aether wind) did not exist.
|
|
|
|
How come if the M&M apparatus is oriented in different directions it
|
|
produces different results, not greatly different, but different
|
|
none the less?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be that M&M did not consider, at that time, that a Dynamic
|
|
Aether might exist, one where the aether is constantly in motion,
|
|
with intense local rotary, and wave movements within the aether
|
|
space?
|
|
|
|
[Was the directionality thing just one more anomaly in physics that
|
|
got swept under the rug, when it couldn't be correlated to the
|
|
desired outcome of the experiment?]
|
|
|
|
The following statement would be considered heresy by the
|
|
Relativity crowd...but take note of who said it:
|
|
|
|
"According to the general theory of relativity, space without
|
|
ether is unthinkable; for in such a space there not only would
|
|
be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of
|
|
existence for standards of space and time [measuring rods and
|
|
clocks] nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical
|
|
sense."
|
|
|
|
--- Albert Einstein, from an obscure speech in
|
|
Leiden, Germany; 1920. [Did you catch the
|
|
name there: Albert Einstein?]
|
|
|
|
--- See "Sidelights of Relativity" by Albert
|
|
Einstein, London, 1922 pg. 23.
|
|
|
|
That's all I've got time for at the moment, how about you?
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Further references [Don't judge a book by it's cover {or it's
|
|
title}.]:
|
|
|
|
"Star Wars Now! The Bohm-Aharono Effect, Scalar
|
|
Interferometry, and Soviet Weaponization" by T. E. Bearden
|
|
|
|
"Soviet Research On Unified Field Theories, False Vacuum
|
|
States, and Antigravity (U)" -- Capt. Robert M. Collins
|
|
(TQTR), 06/11/1986
|
|
|
|
"Soviet Research On The A-Vector Potential and Scalar Waves
|
|
(U)" -- Capt. Robert M. Collins (TQTR), 12/8/1986
|
|
|
|
"Tesla's Secret and The Soviet Tesla Weapons (Part I of II)"
|
|
by T. E. Bearden, in Energy Unlimited Fall 1981, #11.
|
|
|
|
"Tesla's Secret and The Soviet Tesla Weapons (Part II of II)"
|
|
by T. E. Bearden, in Energy Unlimited Winter 1981, #12.
|
|
|
|
"The Manual Of Free Energy Devices and Systems" by D. A.
|
|
Kelly, contains "Scalar Electromagnetics: A Quick Overview" by
|
|
T. E. Bearden
|
|
|
|
US Patent #4,204,212 "Conformal Spiral Antenna", patent rights
|
|
have been assigned to the US Army. [Related to Scalar waves.]
|
|
|
|
"Dr. Nieper's Revolution in Technology Medicine and Society" by
|
|
Hans A. Nieper; English edition May 1985
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"How To Build A Flying Saucer And Other Proposals in
|
|
Speculative Engineering" by T. B. Pawlicki
|
|
|
|
"Relativity The Special and The General Theory" by Albert
|
|
Einstein
|
|
|
|
"The ABC's of Relativity; 4th revised edition" by Bertrand
|
|
Russell
|
|
|
|
I posted a message asking for help with a longitudinal [Scalar] wave
|
|
transceiver, made from a coil of wire and a Ferrite rod. So it's not
|
|
all that hard to make one, like some of these references would lead
|
|
you to believe.... (file listed as SCALAR1.ASC on KeelyNet).
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|