265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
April 2, 1993
|
|
|
|
FREENRG4.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Alain Bealieu.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
ADDITIONAL COMMENT FROM BEARDEN (pertaining to the release of his
|
|
paper "The Final Secret for Free Energy", listed on KeelyNet as
|
|
FREENRG3.ZIP) :
|
|
|
|
The present classical CEM model prescribes closed, energy-
|
|
conservative type systems. If any electrical device works totally
|
|
according to the accepted CEM model, it cannot and will not ever
|
|
produce overunity. Simply put, you have excluded any hidden EM
|
|
source that is freely replenished, and you have assumed continual
|
|
killing of all energy input sources utilized. On the other hand, if
|
|
one takes the view that the overunity electrical machines are
|
|
possible after all, then __ whether one is consciously aware of it
|
|
or not __ one has implied that classical CEM must somehow be
|
|
substantially flawed. If it's flawed, then __ being a model __ some
|
|
of its primary assumptions (postulates) and/or fundamental
|
|
definitions must be in error.
|
|
|
|
The proper place to go after "free electrical energy" is to
|
|
rigorously examine CEM, over and over, until flaws are uncovered
|
|
which allow a hidden, freely replenished source of input energy. In
|
|
other words, one must find a way to "open" the electrical system to
|
|
an in flow of energy from this source, without closing off the
|
|
source.
|
|
|
|
Until one finds such an "extension" of CEM, one has no model or
|
|
concept which can reasonably be expected to provide overunity
|
|
electrical energy output. Note also that, while the majority of the
|
|
EM circuitry of an electrical overunity machine may obey CEM, at
|
|
least one section __ where the source is freely tapped and the
|
|
excess energy extracted __ must violate CEM.
|
|
|
|
I have spent many arduous years in this very process, right or
|
|
wrong. The bottom line of my search is this: the only verified (by
|
|
Whittaker and Ziolkowski) (WZ) "freely replenished river" of EM
|
|
energy, that can act as the required "free energy" source for input
|
|
to the would-be overunity electrical system, is the potential. But
|
|
to understand the potential, completely new definitions are required
|
|
for many entities, among them being energy, electrical charge,
|
|
electrostatic scalar potential, voltage, etc. The present so-called
|
|
"definitions" of these entities in CEM are either non-existent,
|
|
entirely wrong, or quite unsatisfactory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So far, the search has uncovered two major ways to tap the
|
|
continually-replenished EM energy in the scalar EM potential:
|
|
|
|
(1) use of the inner WZ internal biwave structure of the potential
|
|
as pump waves on/to a nonlinear material (such as the atomic
|
|
nucleus), so that the nucleus becomes a pumped phase conjugate
|
|
mirror. Then, by normal phase conjugate optical theory, simply
|
|
inputting a small signal wave will produce an amplified phase
|
|
conjugate replica (PCR) wave emitted from the mirror material,
|
|
and this PCR will precisely backtrack the original input signal
|
|
wave's path (see the distortion correction theorem) back out of
|
|
the nucleus, out of the atom, and into the external circuit.
|
|
|
|
There, the amplified PCR wave can be "filtered off" and sent to
|
|
the external load, to power the load. The Floyd Sweet vacuum
|
|
triode works precisely by this mechanism. Note particularly
|
|
that Barrett has shown that higher topology EM (such as the
|
|
original quaternion EM theory) can accomplish such "optical
|
|
functioning" without the use of optical materials.
|
|
|
|
To do Sweet's vacuum triode type process is thus theoretically
|
|
possible with electrical circuitry alone, but one must have
|
|
more than the current understanding of CEM, as Barrett pointed
|
|
out. In other words, one can "open" any 4-space system by
|
|
adding hyperspace (or subspace, if one insists on retaining
|
|
Minkowski 4-space). One can thus have a hyperspatial source.
|
|
Indeed, Ziolkowski and others have already pointed out that the
|
|
WZ type decomposition of the scalar potential is essentially
|
|
equivalent to having complex sources.
|
|
|
|
(2) The second way is to "trap the electron gas electrons" in a
|
|
separate collector, feed "current-free potential" to the
|
|
collector from a primary battery or other source of potential,
|
|
and collect a bunch of excess energy (potential) in the
|
|
collector's "penned up free electron 'horses'" waiting to carry
|
|
the excess energy to the load and dissipate it there, once they
|
|
have been released.
|
|
|
|
Then, one switches the primary potential source away from the
|
|
collector, while the "energy-loaded horses" are still trapped
|
|
and straining at the bit, so that no work can be done __ by
|
|
those agitated horses when they stampede out of there __ on the
|
|
internal resistance of the primary source, to destroy or reduce
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
In the same switching action, the collector with its "snorting
|
|
but still trapped electron horses" is switched across the load
|
|
to form a totally separate circuit with it, having nothing at
|
|
all to do with the original primary source of potential. Then,
|
|
the agitated horses are released, and thunder out through the
|
|
load, scattering their riders (excess energy) in all directions
|
|
in the load, producing work/heat and powering the load. They
|
|
will also charge on around to the reverse side of the
|
|
collector, and kill its charge separation (kill its potential)
|
|
as well, just as does any ordinary circuit.
|
|
|
|
The major disadvantage of method 1, as we presently have seen
|
|
it done (however, check Barrett's demonstration that Tesla's
|
|
patented circuitry is capable of doing it by circuitry alone),
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is that time-reversed electrical energy is produced. So Method
|
|
1 has some serious drawbacks. "Time-reversed energy stuff",
|
|
which should stay in the atomic nucleus as Newtonian 3rd law
|
|
reactions and 3rd-law energy exchanges, is dragged out.
|
|
|
|
Unusual effects on biological systems can occur. Antigravity
|
|
effects can occur. Other hidden processes in the universes,
|
|
that affect the atomic nucleus, can be gated into the external
|
|
circuitry, causing disaster. Monopoles can be deposited in the
|
|
magnets, causing them to explode like hand grenades. Most of
|
|
the new "massive time-reverse energy" phenomenology is still
|
|
unknown.
|
|
|
|
One cannot at this stage of ignorance adequately guarantee
|
|
human safety. I presently don't see just how this kind of
|
|
energy can pass an Underwriter Laboratories' testing and
|
|
certification, until a lot more exhaustive work is done to
|
|
understand the new phenomenology.
|
|
|
|
Method 2, however, yields ordinary, garden-variety, positive-time
|
|
electrical energy. The method presented in the paper is my own
|
|
discovery. No unusual time-reversed phenomena are involved. It would
|
|
appear to be eminently practical to produce and certify power units
|
|
based on Method 2. The phenomenology and risks are the same as for
|
|
ordinary, time-forward power systems.
|
|
|
|
Method 2 has another unique characteristic: as a system, all the
|
|
subsystems are already in the literature and validated. They have
|
|
just not previously been put together in this fashion. So
|
|
development of the system really represents an "integration" problem
|
|
only, after one first does a little development of a proper
|
|
degenerate semiconductor material (DSM).
|
|
|
|
In other words, one first develops (and tests) the exact doping
|
|
materials and percentage, to get a DSM material that is still a good
|
|
conductor but has a relaxation time of __ say __ one tenth of a
|
|
millisecond. One builds the wires from the battery to the collector
|
|
out of this new DSM material. If one uses a capacitor for the
|
|
collector, the plates must be made out of the new DSM material, not
|
|
out of normal "pure conductor" material.
|
|
|
|
Then one develops a switcher that switches in one tenth (or less)
|
|
the relaxation time of the DSM, or in this case in one hundredth of
|
|
a millisecond. That switching time, of course, is easy for any
|
|
decent electronic technician or electronic engineer.
|
|
|
|
One also develops a timing circuit that will
|
|
|
|
(1) sense the status of the discharge of the collector energy
|
|
through the load, and
|
|
(2) trigger the switching at the correct times so that a smooth
|
|
two-cycle (collect, discharge) process results. Note that
|
|
the lengths of cycle one and cycle two are not necessarily
|
|
equal at all. One may use multiple collectors/loads
|
|
simultaneously, cascaded collectors/loads, etc. Hundreds of
|
|
variations are possible and feasible.
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to do anything with this discovery in a normal
|
|
manner. I would dearly like to be economically independent, so I
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
could work full time in my efforts on free energy, antigravity,
|
|
extended EM healing, cancer, etc. Many orthodox scientists will also
|
|
fiercely resist this upstart notion of "overunity" electrical
|
|
machines to the bitter end. When powerful economic interests realize
|
|
one has such things for real, one is certainly going to be stopped,
|
|
jailed, or killed, or he may just "mysteriously vanish" and never be
|
|
seen again.
|
|
|
|
So I just freely released and distributed my discovery of method 2,
|
|
in the paper "The Final Secret of Free Energy". It is deliberately
|
|
targeted toward technicians, junior engineers, and educated laymen.
|
|
(The principles and definitions raised, however, can be debated to
|
|
the nth degree by knowledgeable foundation scientists). The paper
|
|
has already been distributed worldwide. Now the principles and
|
|
definitions are available to everyone. If they are in error, shortly
|
|
that will be proven in spades. If they are correct, that will also
|
|
be established shortly.
|
|
|
|
Anyone who wishes can develop and patent a particular application.
|
|
There's no longer any way to stop this information from being
|
|
disseminated and utilized. I hope that a flurry of development and
|
|
patenting activity will result around the world. Get cheap, clean
|
|
electrical energy to everyone. Bring on the electric auto, clean up
|
|
the noxious auto exhausts, get rid of giant oil spills, and clean up
|
|
the biosphere.
|
|
|
|
Tom Bearden, March 12, 1993
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|