2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

925 lines
40 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 30, 1993
FE_REVW.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This SUPERIOR file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Ray Berry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Notes...
Vangard Sciences and KeelyNet enthusiastically recommends that
you subscribe to the IANS! They are performing an excellent
service and you can keep fully informed of what is HOT!
Also if you can manage it, we HIGHLY RECOMMEND attending their
yearly conference: the International Symposium on New Energy.
International Association for New Science (IANS),
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins, CO 80524,
(303) 482-3731, $45.00 for both the IANS and INE.
IANS supports the INE.
Other excellent reference materials, journals and newsletters
are also included at the end of this file. Other addresses are
listed in the CONTACT1 file on KeelyNet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A Critical Review of the Available Information
Regarding Claims
of Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and
Over-Unity Experiments and Devices
Patrick G. Bailey Toby Grotz
P.O. Box 201 760 Prairie Avenue
Los Altos, CA Craig, CO
94023-0201 81625-1346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
A summary review is presented of the experiments, motors,
generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in
the past few years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation.
The concepts of free-energy, zero-point energy, and over-unity
devices are not new, and many examples of such devices have been
built within the last 100 years.
26 researchers are reviewed and 11 are selected for immediate
interest and support. Whether a new form of potential energy can be
Page 1
demonstrated and successfully utilized within the near future for
the ultimate benefit of the human race remains to be seen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions
'Energy' cannot be created nor destroyed - it exists throughout
space and within matter.
'Perpetual Motion' does not exist -long lasting motion is easily
observable, such as planetary orbits.
'Stupidity' is not hereditary - and it is not a survival trait.
'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) is known as an energy that fills the
fabric of all space. Technically the ZPE results from an
electric flux that flows orthogonally to our perceived
dimension or reality. The mass equivalence of this energy
has been calculated by physicists to be on the order of
1093 gms/cm3. Henry T. Moray, Walter Russell, and
Nikola Tesla described the nature of the ZPE and designed
and built equipment to engineer its properties. It may be
possible to build devices to cohere this energy. This
would result in a non-polluting, unlimitedsupply of
virtually free energy.
'Free Energy' is a term that can have two meanings: either
the additional energy that can be obtained from a device at
little or no additional cost, so the additional energy is
essentially free; or more output energy that appears to be
available than input energy, such as in the case of
detonating an atomic bomb.
'Over-unity Devices' are those systems which appear to produce more
energy than they use. In analyzing such systems, a box is
drawn around the device and energy balances are formulated
to measure the amounts of energy coming into and out of
that box. Whether or not the device is termed an 'over-
unity' device will depend upon the size of the box. When
the box is drawn large enough, all systems or devices will
have a net energy transfer of zero. On the other hand,
when the box is drawn just small enough, the device can be
said to be an 'over-unity' device, and an intelligent
physicist will know better. From this point of view,
examples of existing so-called free-energy devices abound:
such as Hoover Dam.
So then is any generator, or any nuclear reactor. More energy
certainly comes out of a dam than went into making it (by us, at
least). And any dam engineer will tell you that it will produce
more energy than it cost to build and that it will last forever (or
at least until his kids get out of college).
So it is seen that these generators can be thought of as free-energy
devices, while they are really only energy conversion devices, and
obviously not perpetual motion machines. People who insist that
they actually are, are either very ignorant or very devious. In
such cases, examine the person's true motives.
Page 2
[Another 'free-energy' device of increasingly note-worthy attention
is the Federal Reserve, which is not an agency of the US government.
(Figgie 1992)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources of Information and Data
Ultimately, the sources for all information in these areas come from
the inventors, researchers, or investigators themselves. The US and
foreign patent offices provide some information into new
developments in these areas, yet the actual patents reveal very
little useful information and almost no experimental results.
Patent law does not require complete disclosure of all data, and
patents are held nationally. An interesting area of big business
today is the international transfer of patents at no cost.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Other sources of information and data include papers, reports,
books, and conference proceedings. Papers and books that are of
special interest are those by :
Hans Coler (1946),
the Gravity Research Group (GRG1956),
Stefan Marinov (1992),
Hans Nieper (1984),
and Shinichi Seike(1992).
Conferences that have been recently held to collect and summarize
information in these areas include the 26th and 27th Intersociety
Energy Conversion Engineering Conferences (1991 and 1992) and the
more recent International Symposium on New Energy (ISNE) (April
1993).
All of these materials are available from the sources identified in
the References section. As a result of a 1993 ISNE working
group, the working devices were categorized into four distinct
areas:
(1) Solid-State Space-Energy Generators,
(2) Rotating Space-Energy Machines,
(3) Fusion Conversion Devices, and
(4) Hydrogen Energy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Interesting Theories, Experiments, and Devices
"Some things have to be believed to be seen." [1] There are several
societies and conferences world-wide that present and sometimes
document the results of research in these areas. As this work is
not considered as mainstream science within the US, much of the
results of these researchers goes by unnoticed.
The 26th IECEC (1991) provided a forum for researchers in these
areas to voluntarily come forward and present their ideas, theories,
and results to the mainstream scientific community. They were met
with interest ranging from mistrust to awe, and from feelings
ranging from friendship to outright anger. The ranges of these
attitudes will likely depend upon the emotional stability of the
listeners.
The 26th IECEC created international interest that stimulated
further review papers to be published in the later IECECs. A
Page 3
growing group of organizations is networking on a world-wide basis
to support and organize this on-going research. Some of these
organizations are listed in the references (AREI, AFS, GRI, IASA,
INE, ITS, JPI, SEA, TI, and USP).
"New Energy News" is the new monthly newsletter of Institute for New
Energy (INE), a recently formed US technical society, created in
April 1993, that is committed to researching these technical
areas. Note that the references include complete and accurate
address and cost information, so that serious investigators have no
excuse to not investigate.
This review includes all of the information that was made available
to the 1991 IECEC, the 1992 IECEC, the 1993 International Symposium
on New Energy (ISNE), and other contributed personal source
information and documents. Our focus here is on actual data and
results - not on ideas or mathematical theories. Our emphasis here
is on repeatable experimental evidence - or on the documented
testimony of multiple reliable witnesses that have been willing to
stand-up, testify, and document a description of what they
witnessed. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean that it's not
real! The list of the researchers, experiments, devices, and
results that were addressed in this review are listed in Table 1.
The reference corresponding to each researcher is also listed.
Videotapes were made of all ref. speakers at the 1991 IECEC and the
1993 ISNE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible Misleading Results
"But goodness alone is never enough. A hard, cold wisdom is
required for goodness to accomplish good." [2]
We feel that the interpretation of anyone's results can fall into
one of four categories:
(1) Lying for attention;
(2) Lying for money(funding, stock options, etc.);
(3) Inaccurate measurement or misinterpretation of the data
or results; and
(4) Accurate representation of the physical phenomena.
In our reviews, we found absolutely no evidence that any one of the
researchers we studied in Table 1 belonged specifically in
categories (1) or (2) (although so far as we know three of these
researchers have not been able to replicate their initial published
results).
Frauds are quickly discovered, if encouraged to reproduce their
results and to provide detailed information. So, we were left to
carefully analyze the results from each researcher and to carefully
draw our own conclusions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
Table 1. A Listing of Researchers and their Experiments and/or
Devices of Current Interest
Researcher(s) Experiments, Devices, and Demonstrations
References
Adams, Robert
Adams Pulsed Motor Generator and Replication
Adams 1993
Baumann, Paul
Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter Device et. al.
Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Bedini, John
Bedini Free Energy Generator Plans and Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Binder, Timothy
Russell's Nuclear-Magnetic Transmutation
ISNE 1993 Experiments
Brown, Paul
Nuclear Resonant Generators and Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Coler, Hans
Magnetstromapparat and Stromerzeuger
Coler 1946 Devices / Demos.
Grotz, Toby
Russell's Power Multiplication Principle
IECEC 1992, Experiments
ISNE 1993
Hathaway, George
Unipolar Dynamo of Novel Construction
IECEC 1991, Experiments
ISNE 1993
Hickox, Barbara
Electric Dynamo Patent
IECEC 1991
Johnson, Gary
Electrically Induced Explosions in Water
IECEC 1992 Experiments
Kelly, Don
Electromagnetic Antigravity Drop Tests
ISNE 1993, SEA
Lambertson, Wingate
WIN Process
IECEC 1991
Marinov, Stefan
Venetin Coliu Generator Demonstrations
ISNE 1993
McKie, Richard
Power On Demand Module Concept (PODMOD)
IECEC 1991
Meyer, Stanley
Water Fuel Cell Demonstrations
ISNE 1993
Moray, John
T. Henry Moray's Radiant Energy Device
IECEC 1991
Page 5
Muller, William & Kevin
Muller Motor/Generator
IECEC 1991
Newman, Joseph
Magnetic Fields Utilization Energy Machine
Newman 1993
dePalma, Bruce
N-Machine Experiments
IECEC 1991
Pappas, Panos
Energy Creation in Sparks and Discharge Experiments
IECEC 1991
Reed, Troy and Evelyn
Reed Magnetic Motor Experiments
IECEC 1991
ISNE 1993
Seike, Shinichi
Negative Energy and Landau Oscillator Experiments
Seike 1992
Storms, Edmund
Established Cold Fusion and Reproducible Results
IECEC 1993
Sweet, Floyd
Vacuum Triode Assembly Device Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Tewari, Paramahansa
Space Power Generator Experiments
ISNE 1993
Valone, Thomas
Homopolar Generator Experiments
IECEC 1991,
ISNE 1993
While on one hand some researchers may possibly be overstating
the capabilities and results of their experiments and devices, on
the other hand many so-called 'scientific experts' are very active
in discounting ALL of the research results in these areas without
investigating the details of any of them.
"The Nobel chemist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957) used to give a
cautionary talk on pathological science, and ... told a number of
stories of pathological science and listed the features they have in
common." (Cromer, Skeptical Inquirer, 1993).
In his eight page article, Cromer states that there are many lessons
from this:
"(1) Scientists themselves are often poor judges of the
scientific process;
(2) Scientific research is very difficult. Anything that can
go wrong will go wrong;
(3) Science isn't dependent on the honesty or wisdom
ofscientists.
(4) Real discoveries of phenomena contrary to all previous
scientific experience are very rare, while fraud, fakery,
foolishness,and error resulting from over enthusiasm and
delusion are all too common.
Page 6
Thus, Glashow's closed-minded 'I don't believe a word of it' is
going to be correct far more often than not." Cromer also cites
Langmuir assaying (Langmuir 1989): "There are cases where there is
no dishonesty involved, but where people are tricked into false
results by a lack of understanding about what human beings can do to
themselves in the way of being led astray by subjective effects,
wishful thinking, or threshold interactions. These are examples of
pathological science. These are things that attracted a great deal
of attention. ... [But] the critics can't reproduce the effects.
Only the supporters could do that.
In the end, nothing was salvaged. Why should there be? There isn't
anything there. There never was."Our sincere response to you is:
If there is no initial interest - then there will be no
investigation.
If there is no investigation, there will be no research to
replicate. Your interest will spark the urge to replicate.
If there IS interest, research, and no replication, then that
fact should be published and disseminated with integrity.
If there are witnesses to the results and the results were or
are repeatable, then we feel the fault and blame lies with
the critic and not with the researcher.
Therefore, given the experiments and devices referenced
in this paper: Demand that they be tested with an open mind!
One success out of all of the failures is more than worth the
effort!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Devices of Great Interest
"Grant shook his head. It's been discussed, in the field. Many
people imagined it was coming. But not so soon."
"Story of our species, Malcolm said laughing. Everybody knows
it's coming, but not so soon."[3]
Table 2. A Listing of Promising Devices of Great Interest
with Documented Demonstrations
Researcher(s) Effects Observed Yrs Cat Doc MWs RDs Res Eff
Baumann, Over-Unity, Rotating, 1984+ 2 Y Y Y N N
Paul et. al. Self-Sustaining
Binder, Chemical Dependency 1927+ 1 Y Y Y Y N
Timothy on E-M
Coler, Gravitational Field 1942+ 1 Y Y Y N N
Hans Generator
Grotz, Over-Unity, 1961+ 1 Y Y N Y N
Toby Rotational Generator
Kelly, E-M Field Drop Tests 1992+ 1 Y N Y Y N
Don & Oscillators
Marinov, Anti-Lenz Effect 1988+ 1 Y Y Y Y N
Stefan Motor/Generator
Page 7
Researcher(s) Effects Observed Yrs Cat Doc MWs RDs Res Eff
Meyer, Energy from Water, 1980s 4 Y Y Y Y N
Stanley H2 Fracturing
Moray, Over-Unity, 1930s 1 Y Y Y N N
John and Self-Sustaining Device
Kevin
Storms, Over-Unity Thermal, 1990s 3 Y Y Y Y N
Edmund Cold Fusion
Sweet, Over-Unity, 1990s 1 Y Y Y N N
Floyd Steady-Variable Device
Tewari, Over-Unity Rotational 1993 2 Y N Y Y N
Paramahamsa N-Machine
Key : Yrs Years the Effects were observed.
Cat Categories 1 through 4, as defined under 'Sources of
Information and Data.'
Doc Documentation Exists (Yes or No) (Y/N).
MWs Multiple Witnesses Testimony (Y/N).
RDs Repeated Demonstrations (Y/N).
Res Currently Being Researched (Y/N).
Eff Large Research Effort (Y/N).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The researchers and the works that we feel are worthy of great
attention in the near future are those that are listed in Table 2.
It should be noted that some researchers have been omitted from
Table 2 only because either their work is of a proprietary or
confidential nature, or because we could not obtain the required
data or documentation from witnesses.
Such researchers include: Paul Brown,
Bruce dePalma,
and the Reeds.
All of the researchers listed in Table 1 and not listed in Table 2
have provided and we trust will continue to provide important
contributions to and documentation of their work.
In fact, some of this work may turn out to be more important than
those currently listed in Table 2. However, at the present moment
of time; as this paper is being written, we considered those devices
listed in Table 2 to be of the greatest interest to us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary Information and Data
Testatika
The Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter developed by Paul Baumann and
the Methernitha spiritual community in Switzerland has been
repeatedly demonstrated to many scientists upon request (26th IECE
C, Nieper 1984,SEA).
Its three foot counter-rotating disks and specially designed energy
storage system are reported to generate a steady output power of
about 3 to 5 kilo-Watts (kW) indefinitely - while sitting on top of
a table. A videotape has been produced and its narration has
been transcribed.
Page 8
Russell
Tim Binder and his team have replicated the 1927 experiments of
Walter Russell and have created fluorine from pure water vapor using
complex E-M field arrangements. This work validates Russell's
theories about nuclear structure and the proper arrangement of the
Periodic Table of the Elements.
Coler
Hans Coler demonstrated two major devices to many amazed witnesses
and officials in Germany during 1925-1945. A 60 kW device was built
in 1937, and the war bombings ended further research in 1944. A
complete 32 page report declassified by the British Intelligence
Objectives Sub-Committee is available. (Coler 1946, Nieper 1984)
The theories expressed are very similar to those presented in a
comprehensive report (GRG 1956) (the latest one we could find so
far) on electrogravitics systems, interactions of E-M with gravity,
or counterbary control devices.
Toby Grotz and his team are planning to replicate the energy
experiments of Walter Russell. In the fall of 1959, General
Chapman, Colonel Fry, Major Sargent, Major Cripe, and others from
NORAD in Colorado Springs, attended a meeting at Swannanoa, Virginia
(University Of Science And Philosophy) at the invitation of Walter
Russell.
At this meeting Russell explained the workings of a device he
proposed to build to take advantage of the vacuum state energy, and
the two directional movement of energy from gravitation,
(generation), to radiation, (degeneration).
During the following year Russell, his wife, Lao, and their
assistants built the device. The prototype that was built consisted
of two sets of dual and magnetically-sexed coils. On September 10,
1961, Walter and Lao Russell reported to their contacts at NORAD,
that the coils had worked and that the President of the United
States could announce to the world that a "greater, safer power than
atomic energy" could be provided for industry and transportation.
Don Kelly is the editor of the Space Energy Newsletter (SEA) and
has been conducting and reporting results of E-M to gravity drop
tests. He finds that energized coil assemblies have a 40% lag in
drop time over about five feet. Other related research world-wide
verifies that spinning masses appear to lose weight at high
rotational speeds.
Stefan Marinov is the editor of Deutsche Physik in Germany and has
demonstrated many experiments that confound conventional E-M theory.
His recent paper describes devices that create anti-Lenz effects,
thus increasing the generator's efficiency.
Stanley Meyer has obtained over 28 patents in both the US and other
countries that document his water fuel cell and hydrogen fracturing
process technology. He began this work in 1980 and has spent over
$1.6 million. Although he has been approached to sell the
technology, he says he has no intention to do so and plans to retain
control to make sure his invention is brought to the public for the
good of mankind. An informative and recommended videotape of his
1993 ISNE presentation is available through the INE.
Page 9
John and Kevin Moray are pursuing the technology that was repeatedly
demonstrated to the press in the 1930s by T. Henry Moray. One
device was reported to generate 50 kW for long periods of time by
itself. Edmund Storms has reviewed much of the work done
internationally in the so-called area of 'cold fusion' and has
documented the results and repeated results of the now world-wide
research in this area.
Floyd Sweet demonstrated his vacuum triode device to at least two
expert electronics technicians that have documented their
observations in sworn affidavits. A videotape was also made during
a demonstration. From a nine volt battery starter unit, nearly
continuous output powers of 500 W to 50 kW have been reported to be
observed. Experimentation is still in progress to further refine
the device and to improve its operational capabilities.
Paramahamsa Tewari has been doing experiments with a N-Machine and
has reported over-unity operation from instrument readings. He is
currently performing new experiments to feed the output of the
device back into the input to obtain a 'free-running' condition.
Many researchers have performed experiments with these devices, also
called, homo-polar generators, or unipolar dynamos. They usually
consist of a rotating magnetic disk where electrical current is
passed from the center of the disk to its edge. Small increases in
the motor input power result in large increases of output power,
thus encouraging the idea of an over-unity cross-over point.
Regardless of all of the theory and reasons pro and con, it will be
exciting to see the results of Tewari's forth coming experiments and
videotapes. It appears that all serious research and development
activities in the energy conversion technologies will continue to be
closely monitored and guarded by the existing oil, transportation,
and economics industries.
Serious researchers in these new areas (Meyer, Methernitha, Sweet)
are not allowing "the establishment" to buy them out. At the same
time, there is strong evidence of aggressive suppression. The
German company Becocraft specializing in the development of "new
energy devices" was forcibly shut down and its president quickly
imprisoned on investment fraud charges in a court case that had only
one plaintiff: the Utility Company of Cologne! (Marinov 1992).
All of the investors of Becocraft fought the case to no avail.
Closer to home, the US Patent Office has classified over 3,000
patent devices or applications under the secrecy order, Title 35,
U.S. Code (195 2) Sections 181-188.
Where did that technology go? These patents would be a great place
to start for a new company involved with defense conversion
technologies for environmental use!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusions
"Woe to you, you blind leaders of a hoard of blind, who say:
'This should be done and that should not be left undone.'
You only represent a false teaching and ignore the laws of
Creation." [4]
Page 10
"It has been said that science is man's futile attempt to understand
Nature. While it becomes important to learn, understand, and apply
science in our everyday lives, it is equally important to continue
the pursuit of unraveling the secrets of Nature." (ISNE 1993, from
Forward 1).
If ignorance was a good enough reason to not try, the light bulb
would have never been invented and the Earth would still be flat.
Let us be judged by our work and repeatable results, and not by
hasty words. Ifsome of these works turn out to be not valid: So Be
It; Let it Be Known; and Let's Move Forward with Integrity!
We are all desperately looking for the next big breakthrough in
modern physics to assist us in solving the escalating energy and
environment crises!
Do something to promote and encourage the continuation of these
researchers and these works! If you don't do it, who will? If not
now, when?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
References
[5] 26th IECEC, Proceedings of the 26th IECEC, Volume 4,
pp 329-492, August 1991:
American Nuclear Society,
555 North Kensington Avenue,
La Grange Park, IL 60525,
$275.00.
27th IECEC, Proceedings of the 27th IECEC, Volume,
pp 4.357-4.295, August 1992:
Society of Automotive Engineers,
400 Commonwealth Drive,
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001,
Order No. P-259, $350.00.
28th IECEC, Proceedings of the 28th IECEC, August 1993:
American Chemical Society,
Meetings Department,
1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20036,
$310.00.
Adams, R. "The Adams Pulsed Motor Generator Manual,"
Jan. 1993:
Nexus New Times Magazine,
PO Box 30,
Mapleton Qld 4560,
Australia, $50.00.
AERI,
Advanced Energy Research Institute,
14 Devonshire Mews West, (yes, MEWS not News!!)
London W1N 1FP, Great Britain.
AFS,
Academy for Future Sciences,
PO Box FE,
Los Gatos, CA 95031.
Page 11
Coler, H., "The Invention of Hans Coler, Relating to an
Alleged New Source of Power,"
British Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee
report No. 1043 Item 31, 32 pp, Now Unclassified,
Summer 1946.
(Available from the authors for $5.00)
Cromer, A., "Pathological Science: An Update,"
Skeptical Inquirer, Vol.17, pp 400-407, 1993.
Figgie, H. E. Jr., Bankruptcy 1995: The Coming Collapse of
America and How to Stop It,
Little, Brown and Company, US and Canada, 1992.
GRG, Gravity Research Group, "Electrogravitics Systems: An
Examination of Electrostatic Motion, Dynamic Counterbary,
and Barycentric Control,"
Feb. 1956: Gravity Research Group report GRG-013/56,
Wright Patterson AFB Technical Library,
Catalog No. TL 565 A9,
WPAFB, Ohio 45433.GRI,
Group Research Institute,
PO Box 438,
Nelson, New Zealand.
IASA,
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin,
4030 Braker Lane W.,Suite 300,
Austin, TX 78759.
INE,
Institute for New Energy,
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins,CO 80524,
$40.00/yr.
ITS,
International Tesla Society,
PO Box 5636,
Colorado Springs, CO80931.
ISNE,
Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Energy,
April 16-18, 1993:
International Association for New Science (IANS),
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins, CO 80524,
(303) 482-3731, $45.00 for both the IANS and INE.
IANS supports the INE.
JPI,
Japan Psychrotronic Institute,
c/o Shiuji Inomata,
Electrotechnical Laboratory,
1-1-4 Umezono,
Tsukuba-shi,
Ibaraki 305, Japan.
Page 12
Langmuir, I., "Pathological Science,"
Physics Today, 42: 36-48, October 1989.
Marinov, S., "Regarding Becocraft - Letter to
Mr. Richard von Weizsacker,
President of the German Federal Republic, 10 October 1992",
Deutsche Physik,
No. 7, East-West Publishers,
Morellenfeldgasse 16,
A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Meyer, S. Water Fuel Cell Technical Brief, July 1991:
Stanley A. Meyer,
3792 (street missing from file!!)
Grove City, OH 43123, $25.00.
"New Energy News",
PO Box 58639,
Salt Lake City, UT 84158-8639:
monthly newsletter free to INE members.
Newman, J., The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman, July 1993:
Joseph Westley Newman,
Route 1, Box 52,
Lucedale, Miss. 39452,
$60.00.
Nieper, H. A., Revolution in Technology, Medicine and
Society, MIT Verlag, Germany, 1984 (In English):
Tesla Book Company,
PO Box 121873,
Chula Vista, CA 91912,
$27.00.
SEA,
Space Energy Association,
PO Box 11422,
Clearwater, FL 34616.
Seike, S., The Principles of Ultra Relativity, 11th Ed.,
1992:
Space Research Institute,
Box 33,
Uwajima, Ehime (798), Japan,
$70.00.
Storms, E., "The Status of 'Cold Fusion'," 28th IECEC paper,
August 1993.
TI,
Tesla Incorporated,
820 Bridger Circle,
Craig, CO 81625.
USP,
Univ. of Science and Philosophy,
Swannanoa Place,
Box 520,
Waynesboro, VA 22980.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge these and many other researchers,
scientists, and skeptics that have contributed serious open research
and documentation to boldly advance science and technology for the
benefit of the human race.
Footnotes :
1. Poltergeist, Screenplay to the MGM/UA film production and
VHS videotape, 1987.
2. Heinlein, Robert A., Stranger in a Strange Land, Berkley
Books, 1982.
3. Crichton, Michael, Jurassic Park, Ballantine Books, 1990.
4. Rashid, Isa; Meier, Eduard. The Talmud of Jmmanuel, 24:29-
30, 1990: Wild Flower Press, PO Box 230893, Tigard, Oregon,
97224, $17.20.5. Complete addresses and total prices are
given.
-------------------------------------------------------
This Paper Was Presented and Published at the:
28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference
August 8-13, 1993, in Atlanta, GA.
Proceedings Pages 2.905-2.910.
The Proceedings of the Conference are Available:
ISBN 0-8412-2772-5
[See "28th IECEC" in the References]
The paper was also recently published in the New Energy News,
Vol. 1, No. 6, October 1993.[See "INE" and "IANS" in the
References]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14