181 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
181 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : BUBBLE1.ASC | Online Date : 12/04/94 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following article is from the October/November 1994 NEXUS magazine. If
|
|
you might wish to subscribe to Duncan's excellent magazine, you can get 6
|
|
issues per year for $25.00 from : NEXUS, PO BOX 177, Kempton, IL, 60946-0177.
|
|
Phone - (815) 253-6464 / FAX - (815) 253-6300
|
|
Tell them you read it on KeelyNet!
|
|
|
|
This SEMINAL paper is simply mind blowing and opens up an entirely new way to
|
|
view matter, energy and all the aetheric permutations......>>> Jerry
|
|
|
|
The file has 5 .GIF images associated with it ; BUB1A1 - BUB1A2 - BUB1B1 -
|
|
BUB1B2 and BUB2.GIF. All the files are bundled with this .ASC text as
|
|
BUBBLE1.ZIP on KeelyNet.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Extracted from "Alchemy Today - Volume 2" by Chris Illert, former staff member
|
|
of Wollongong University, and a leading theoretical physicist and
|
|
mathematician. He has had numerous papers published in prestigious
|
|
international science journals.
|
|
|
|
Matter as Bubbles in the Aether
|
|
by Chris Illert
|
|
|
|
Even as recently as the 1920's, orthodox science believed in a STATIC cosmos,
|
|
until Edwin Hubble demonstrated that it was actually EXPANDING and, therefore,
|
|
must have originated long ago in some titanic 'Big Bang'.
|
|
|
|
Today, most scientists agree that the Universe is outwardly expanding and is
|
|
of finite age, born from a dramatic 'phase transition' when the "aether"
|
|
(quantum vacuum) jumped from one energy state to another, "sucking matter into
|
|
physical existence" within our universe. (1)
|
|
|
|
If one reads Leadbeater's Appendix to the 1919 edition of OCCULT CHEMISTRY
|
|
(2), or William Kingsland's THE PHYSICS OF THE SECRET DOCTRINE (1910) (3), it
|
|
is clear that occult chemists were speaking of proto-aether "Mulaprakriti"
|
|
(what Paul Davies calls "the initial false vacuum") undergoing an expansionary
|
|
phase-change to become "Koilon" (our present-day "normal quantum vacuum")
|
|
driven by "Cosmic Fohat" (the "Superforce" of Paul Davies (4)) which blew
|
|
bubbles (i.e., 'material' particles) in an infinitely dense aether.
|
|
|
|
Cosmic Fohat, a unified Superforce to start with, subsequently split into
|
|
the four presently-known natural forces: gravitation, electromagnetism, the
|
|
strong and the weak nuclear forces.
|
|
|
|
The occultists labour the point that instead of matter being solid within an
|
|
empty insubstantial aether, the aether itself is VERY DENSE (one thousand
|
|
million times denser than platinum, according to Oliver Lodge's estimate), and
|
|
matter is REALLY JUST BUBBLES-the ABSENCE OF AETHER.
|
|
|
|
The 19th century concepts underlying this occult cosmology are easily
|
|
visualized in terms of liquid in a cylinder. Fizzing can be induced if the
|
|
piston is moved; thus did Cosmic Fohat - Superforce - induce a quantum-vacuum
|
|
transition (Mulaprakriti to Koilon), releasing energy which tore the aether
|
|
apart into numerous 'subatomic particles' - BUBBLES - which we see as
|
|
substantial even though they are, in fact, THE ABSENCE OF SUBSTANCE.
|
|
|
|
Thus was matter SUCKED INTO EXISTENCE in the cosmic expansion.
|
|
|
|
Paul Davies writes that "what appears as empty space is actually a seething
|
|
ferment....of quantum activity, teeming with [ghost] VIRTUAL PARTICLES and
|
|
full of complex interactions. ....A real particle...must be always viewed
|
|
against this backdrop of frenetic activity.
|
|
|
|
When [a real particle] moves through space, it is actually swimming in a sea
|
|
of ghost particles of all varieties...entangled in a complexe melee'.... It
|
|
is important to realise that, at the quantum level of description, the vacuum
|
|
is the DOMINANT STRUCTURE. ...particles are only MINOR DISTURBANCES bubbling
|
|
up over this background sea of activity/(shades of implosion/sonoluminscence!)
|
|
|
|
Thus the 'dense' aether (quantum vacuum) is scientific dogma today, even
|
|
though it seemed the height of absurdity when Theosophists first proposed it.
|
|
But what of subatomic particles? Are they really bubbles?
|
|
|
|
In BUB1A1.GIF and BUB1A2.GIF we see electric field lines radiating through the
|
|
aether between charged particles. As the electrical charges are moved apart,
|
|
the field lines spread apart, off to infinity.
|
|
|
|
But one of the simplest kinds of 'massive' particles, a MESON, is shown in
|
|
BUB1B1.GIF and BUB1B2.GIF. The meson is actually a bubble in the aether
|
|
(quantum vacuum) and its internal ('matter') field lines are trapped within
|
|
the bubble. Indeed, if the bubble is somehow stretched, the ('matter') field
|
|
lines actually DRAW CLOSER TOGETHER! This is exactly the OPPOSITE to
|
|
'electric' field lines in the aether!
|
|
|
|
In fact, if the meson bubble stretches TOO FAR, it can DIVIDE into TWO BUBBLES
|
|
(as in BUB2.GIF). The 'charges' inside the bubbles are called quarks
|
|
(represented by black dots) and antiquarks (represented by white dots).
|
|
|
|
Instead of drawing the bubble in the aether, and all its internal field lines,
|
|
we will henceforth introduce a kind of cartoon called the "Nambu string." It
|
|
is just the field line which directly joins the quark and the antiquark INSIDE
|
|
the meson. But we can think of the Nambu string (or spring) as a kind of
|
|
elastic band which can be stretched.
|
|
|
|
If drawn too far apart, as when the meson bubble divides into two, we can
|
|
think of the Nambu string as snapping -but it can never have free ends because
|
|
field lines must BEGIN and END on 'charges' (in this case, quarks and
|
|
antiquarks).
|
|
|
|
So in order for the Nambu string to snap, a quark-antiquark pair must be
|
|
sucked into existence from out of the aether. The quark and the antiquark
|
|
CANCEL out each other (like +1 -1 = 0), so we haven't obtained something for
|
|
nothing. Figure 2 thus shows a meson (matter bubble) dividing into two - and
|
|
the simplified Nambu elastic string 'cartoon' gives us another way of viewing
|
|
the process.
|
|
|
|
One way we could stretch and divide a meson bubble would be to make it SPIN
|
|
VERY FAST; then the centripetal force would draw the quark and antiquark
|
|
APART, stretching the elastic 'string' that holds them together.
|
|
|
|
Thus, spinning 'matter bubbles' in the aether (quantum vacuum) would tend to
|
|
be elongated AND oval-shaped. They are called VECTOR MESONS and there are 37
|
|
different types of them in nature.
|
|
|
|
Non-spinning 'matter bubbles' would TEND TO BE SPHERICAL. They are called
|
|
SCALAR MESONS and there are 36 different kinds of them also in nature.
|
|
|
|
The occult chemists Besant and Leadbeater drew both kinds - vector and scalar
|
|
mesons - as their E3 state of matter, in 1895.
|
|
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
|
|
1. Chris Illert, "Theosophical Cosmogenesis", Theosophy in Australia,
|
|
54(4):204-8, September 1990
|
|
2. A. Besant and C.W. Leadbeater, Occult Chemistry, Theosophical Publishing
|
|
House, London, 1919.
|
|
3. William Kingsland, The Physics of the Secret Doctrine, Theosophical
|
|
Publishing House, London, 1910.
|
|
4. Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
|
|
Nature, Heinemann, 1984, and Unwin, 1985.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vanguard note..
|
|
|
|
Does this mean that we could 'create' matter or energy directly from this
|
|
virtual background of 'frenetic activity'? Is the secret then high speed
|
|
rotation? Does that mean rotation of energy, matter or a combination of
|
|
both?
|
|
|
|
Do not many devices that produce 'phenomena' ranging from anti-grav to
|
|
unidirectional thrust to overunity/free energy require some kind of spinning
|
|
matter or energy?
|
|
|
|
By creating a high speed rotation, could we then cause the separation on a
|
|
micro level of these bubbles to produce two from one? And would they
|
|
necessarily be of the same smaller size and energy density because of the
|
|
split? Or would the virtual background rush in to make them fit a density
|
|
related to their energy/elemental nature?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|