331 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
331 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
May 28, 1993
|
|
|
|
WARNING1.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
|
|
Harold Kobrin of the TVQ group.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
We here at KeelyNet have noted several comments relating to some
|
|
form of noxious energy associated with the production of "cold
|
|
current" or "negative electricity."
|
|
|
|
The only tangible document we have which speaks directly of this, is
|
|
the original "THETA" document that was sent to us from Washington
|
|
state by one our closest associates. We passed a copy of this
|
|
document to several of our associates including Dan Davidson. Dan
|
|
then spent about $1000 building one of the devices, but without
|
|
positive results as to the generation of free energy as claimed in
|
|
the paper.
|
|
|
|
In the original THETA document, (soon to be on KeelyNet in its
|
|
original form), once the construction has been completed, the
|
|
authors (unknown) state that the device should be placed in a steel
|
|
container and placed away from human habitation.
|
|
|
|
There is no mention of the production of radioactive energies, or
|
|
even of any radiaton measurements that might have been taken from
|
|
the device. The paper does however, estimate the life of the barium
|
|
ferrite transformer material to be approximately 300 years. This
|
|
leads us to believe that there is some kind of low level fissioning
|
|
process.
|
|
|
|
So in the case of the THETA machine, at this time, we do not know
|
|
whether a cold current is generated or if it is a process of low
|
|
level radioactive decay.
|
|
|
|
Interestingly enough, some radionics researchers have died under
|
|
mysterious circumstances associated with some as yet unknown noxious
|
|
form of energy. This would indicate that the radionic "carrier"
|
|
might be somehow associated with the "cold current" of free energy.
|
|
At the present time, we know of no one looking into this radionic
|
|
correlation beyond possibly Peter Kelly of Georgia (listed in
|
|
CONTACT1 under Inter-Dimensional Sciences).
|
|
|
|
In the event you are experimenting in the area of scalar fields or
|
|
"cold current" type free energy generators, we urge you to be
|
|
careful and keep track of any physical discomfort or other symptoms
|
|
not normal for you. If you experience anomalies, stop your
|
|
experiments and PLEASE share your experiences with us or other wide
|
|
audiences.
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
A warning from the T.V.Q. group as to the possibility of
|
|
Scalar / Tesla experimentation health risks.
|
|
|
|
There has been quite a lot of talk in the popular press concerning
|
|
the possible health risks due to exposure to electromagnetic
|
|
radiation.
|
|
|
|
While these articles concern themselves with the unavoidable
|
|
exposure to the electromagnetic fields generated by domestic power
|
|
wiring and radio transmissions, there is reason to believe that
|
|
experimenters who work on Tesla coils and scalar electromagnetic
|
|
systems may have an additional cause for concern.
|
|
|
|
The following entry was downloaded from the Usenet some time ago:
|
|
|
|
**********************************************************
|
|
|
|
The May/June issue of "Microwave News" contains very big news.
|
|
|
|
According to the lead article, the EPA's long-awaited report on the
|
|
health risks of electromagnetic fields is about to be released.
|
|
|
|
However, Dr. William Farland, director of EPA's Office of Health and
|
|
Environmental Assessment, apparently decided a few weeks ago to
|
|
delete the report's two most important recommendations:
|
|
|
|
that 60 Hz powerline fields be classified by EPA as "Probable
|
|
Human Carcinogens" (like formaldehyde and creosote), and
|
|
|
|
higher frequency radio emissions and microwaves should be
|
|
classed as "Possible Human Carcinogens" (like saccharine).
|
|
|
|
MN says Dr. Farland's justification for deleting these findings is
|
|
that the causal mechanisms are still not understood, especially the
|
|
relationship between dose and response, even though circumstantial
|
|
evidence for some degree of cancer risk can no longer be ignored.
|
|
|
|
MN editor Louis Slesin also says that Paul Brodeur will have another
|
|
installment of his "Annals of Radiation" series in the July 8th
|
|
issue of the New Yorker. He may comment on this latest EPA
|
|
controversy.
|
|
|
|
Here are the concluding paragraphs from the REVISED (June 1990)
|
|
draft summary of the EPA staff report, as quoted in MN:
|
|
|
|
"In conclusion, the several studies showing leukemia, lymphoma
|
|
and cancer of the nervous system in children exposed to magnetic
|
|
fields from residential 60 Hz electrical power distribution
|
|
systems, supported by similar findings in adults in several
|
|
occupational studies also involving electrical power frequency
|
|
exposures, show a consistent pattern of response that suggests,
|
|
but does not prove, a causal link.
|
|
|
|
Frequency components higher than 60 Hz cannot be ruled out as
|
|
contributing factors. Evidence from a large number of biological
|
|
test systems shows that these fields induce biological effects
|
|
that are consistent with several possible mechanisms of
|
|
carcinogenesis.
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, none of these processes has been experimentally linked
|
|
to the induction of tumors, either in animals or humans, by EMFs
|
|
[electromagnetic fields]. The particular aspects of exposure to
|
|
the EMFs that cause these events are not known.
|
|
|
|
"In evaluating the potential for carcinogenicity of chemical
|
|
agents, EPA has developed an approach that attempts to integrate
|
|
all of the available information into a summary classification of
|
|
the overall weight-of-evidence that the agent is carcinogenic in
|
|
humans.
|
|
|
|
At this time such a characterization regarding the link between
|
|
cancer and exposure to EMFs is not appropriate because the basic
|
|
nature of the interaction between EMFs and biological processes
|
|
is not understood. For example, a real possibility exists that
|
|
exposure to higher field strengths is actually less hazardous
|
|
than exposure to low field strengths.
|
|
|
|
Because of this uncertainty, it is inappropriate to make
|
|
generalizations about the carcinogenicity of EMFs. As additional
|
|
studies with more definitive exposure assessment become
|
|
completed, a better understanding of the nature of the hazard
|
|
will be gained. With our current understanding we can identify
|
|
60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines and perhaps other sources
|
|
in the home as a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in
|
|
people.
|
|
|
|
The absence of key information summarized above makes it
|
|
difficult to make quantitative estimates of risk. Such
|
|
quantitative estimates are necessary before judgments about the
|
|
degree of safety or hazard of a given exposure can be made. This
|
|
situation indicates the need to continue to evaluate the
|
|
information from ongoing studies and to further evaluate the
|
|
mechanisms of carcinogenic action and the characteristics of
|
|
exposure that lead to these effects."
|
|
|
|
US subscriptions to MN cost $250/year, $285/year elsewhere.
|
|
Order from: Microwave News, P.O. Box 1799, Grand Central
|
|
Station, New York, NY 10163 (212-517-2800).
|
|
|
|
**********************************************************
|
|
|
|
The uncertainty in linking the electromagnetic field to any possible
|
|
carcinogenicity is understandable in light of several
|
|
epidemiological studies which attempt to correlate levels of
|
|
exposure and incidences of cancers and leukemia. The results do
|
|
show some correlation, but not a simple one. For example, homes
|
|
located next to high current power transformers do have a higher
|
|
rate of incidence, but not as high as the homes located one house
|
|
further away from the same transformer.
|
|
|
|
We must keep in mind that these studies are conducted by collecting
|
|
data from field studies and then performing statistical analysis.
|
|
Such a study may not show the cause for a given effect if there is
|
|
more than one agent at work.
|
|
|
|
Although the Aharonov-Bohm effect has been proven in the lab, the
|
|
fact that the magnetic field is not a fundamental field is not yet
|
|
accepted or understood by the majority of scientists and engineers.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the studies of electromagnetic exposure also included data on the
|
|
relative strengths of the A-fields as well as the B-fields there may
|
|
be a much stronger case for the possible carcinogenic effects. To
|
|
the best of our knowledge, no such study has been conducted to date.
|
|
|
|
Any such study would require the use of a detector which can
|
|
directly measure the intensity of the magnetic vector potential, or
|
|
A-field. Such detectors do exist, but current A-field detectors are
|
|
not practical for such studies.
|
|
|
|
With a practical, portable A-field detector, it would be possible to
|
|
go back to the original studies and add the relative field intensity
|
|
data. With this new data, a direct cause and effect relationship
|
|
may emerge.
|
|
|
|
In his masterpeice of paranoia " Fer-de-lance " T.E. Bearden shows
|
|
on page 128, slide 33, a scalar wave detector. This device is
|
|
described as a Bedini version of the Dea / Faretto detector. This
|
|
device employs a permanent magnet with a field strength in excess of
|
|
forty kilogauss. This magnet must then be shielded to prevent
|
|
external electromagnetic energy from reaching the coil above the
|
|
magnet.
|
|
|
|
Such a detector is not practical, as the mass of a forty kilogauss
|
|
magnet is considerable at best, and the shielding needed would have
|
|
a still larger mass. It would be difficult to prove that the
|
|
shielding was not saturated, and that any signal detected was not
|
|
electromagnetic in origin. Several layers of shielding would be
|
|
needed to prevent magnetic coupling of external electromagnetic
|
|
signals to the secondary magnetic fields set up in the shielding
|
|
itself.
|
|
|
|
The operation of this detector is based on the theory that the
|
|
magnet's field will be modulated by an incident scalar wave or A-
|
|
field. It is not known to members of this group why the magnet must
|
|
have such a high field strength, but we assume that this is
|
|
necessary to induce a signal in the coil strong enough to be
|
|
measured. The inclusion of a preamplifier into the detector design
|
|
would seem to support this conclusion.
|
|
|
|
Our research group has developed a detector design which is also
|
|
based upon the magnetic modulation theory, but uses a magnetic field
|
|
which is considerably smaller. Because the magnetic field strength
|
|
is much smaller the shielding problems are also reduced, along with
|
|
the detector's mass.
|
|
|
|
This detector design has been proven to have exceptionally high
|
|
sensitivity and is also directional. By using an external pickup
|
|
coil in addition to the detector it is possible to positively
|
|
determine if any given detected signal is of electromagnetic origin.
|
|
|
|
Placed in proximity to a pair of conductors carrying household
|
|
current to a load, this detector shows an A-field to be present at
|
|
twice the line frequency. This can be understood by referring to
|
|
page 123, slide 23, of " Fer-de-lance ".
|
|
|
|
While not exactly light in weight, this new detector is portable and
|
|
most important, could be constructed by experimenters to measure the
|
|
fields generated by whatever devices the experimenter chooses. As
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experimenters develop and improve their devices, they must also
|
|
modify the balance of electromagnetic and scalar energy in the
|
|
device.
|
|
|
|
Even a simple Tesla coil, with a single shorted turn, will produce
|
|
quite large magnetic fields and their associated A-fields. As the
|
|
device is improved, the potential health risks due to these fields
|
|
increase.
|
|
|
|
It is our belief that the ratio of electromagnetic field strength to
|
|
A-field strength is involved in determining the biological effect of
|
|
electromagnetic fields, and that this accounts for the difficulties
|
|
in determining the carcinogenic agent.
|
|
|
|
We are currently investigating several ways to make detailed
|
|
construction plans for these detectors available to anyone
|
|
interested in using them, either for their own work or for studies
|
|
on the effects of electromagnetic fields on living systems. Anyone
|
|
interested should post E-mail to Harold Kobrin's account on this
|
|
BBS (KeelyNet 214-324-301).
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|