529 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
529 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
||
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
||
files on KeelyNet!
|
||
|
||
February 24, 1991
|
||
|
||
REALITY.ASC
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
This file courtesy of Double Helix BBS at 212 865 7043.
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
THE UNIVERSE AS A HOLOGRAM
|
||
|
||
DOES OBJECTIVE REALITY EXIST, OR IS THE UNIVERSE A PHANTASM?
|
||
|
||
In 1982 a remarkable event took place. At the University of
|
||
Paris a research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what
|
||
may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th
|
||
century. You did not hear about it on the evening news. In fact,
|
||
unless you are in the habit of reading scientific journals you
|
||
probably have never even heard Aspect's name, though there are some
|
||
who believe his discovery may change the face of science.
|
||
|
||
Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances
|
||
subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously
|
||
communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating
|
||
them. It doesn't matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion
|
||
miles apart.
|
||
|
||
Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is
|
||
doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein's
|
||
long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the
|
||
speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is
|
||
tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has
|
||
caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to
|
||
explain away Aspect's findings. But it has inspired others to offer
|
||
even more radical explanations.
|
||
|
||
University of London physicist David Bohm, for example,
|
||
believes Aspect's findings imply that objective reality does not
|
||
exist, that despite its apparent solidity the universe is at heart a
|
||
phantasm, a gigantic and splendidly detailed hologram.
|
||
|
||
To understand why Bohm makes this startling assertion, one must
|
||
first understand a little about holograms. A hologram is a three-
|
||
dimensional photograph made with the aid of a laser.
|
||
|
||
To make a hologram, the object to be photographed is first
|
||
bathed in the light of a laser beam. Then a second laser beam is
|
||
bounced off the reflected light of the first and the resulting
|
||
interference pattern (the area where the two laser beams commingle)
|
||
is captured on film.
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
When the film is developed, it looks like a meaningless swirl
|
||
of light and dark lines. But as soon as the developed film is
|
||
illuminated by another laser beam, a three-dimensional image of the
|
||
original object appears.
|
||
|
||
The three-dimensionality of such images is not the only
|
||
remarkable characteristic of holograms. If a hologram of a rose is
|
||
cut in half and then illuminated by a laser, each half will still be
|
||
found to contain the entire image of the rose.
|
||
|
||
Indeed, even if the halves are divided again, each snippet of
|
||
film will always be found to contain a smaller but intact version of
|
||
the original image. Unlike normal photographs, every part of a
|
||
hologram contains all the information possessed by the whole.
|
||
|
||
The "whole in every part" nature of a hologram provides us with
|
||
an entirely new way of understanding organization and order. For
|
||
most of its history, Western science has labored under the bias that
|
||
the best way to understand a physical phenomenon, whether a frog or
|
||
an atom, is to dissect it and study its respective parts.
|
||
|
||
A hologram teaches us that some things in the universe may not
|
||
lend themselves to this approach. If we try to take apart something
|
||
constructed holographically, we will not get the pieces of which it
|
||
is made, we will only get smaller wholes.
|
||
|
||
This insight suggested to Bohm another way of understanding
|
||
Aspect's discovery. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles
|
||
are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the
|
||
distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort
|
||
of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness
|
||
is an illusion. He argues that at some deeper level of reality such
|
||
particles are not individual entities, but are actually extensions
|
||
of the same fundamental something.
|
||
|
||
To enable people to better visualize what he means, Bohm offers
|
||
the following illustration.
|
||
|
||
Imagine an aquarium containing a fish. Imagine also that you
|
||
are unable to see the aquarium directly and your knowledge about it
|
||
and what it contains comes from two television cameras, one directed
|
||
at the aquarium's front and the other directed at its side.
|
||
|
||
As you stare at the two television monitors, you might assume
|
||
that the fish on each of the screens are separate entities. After
|
||
all, because the cameras are set at different angles, each of the
|
||
images will be slightly different. But as you continue to watch
|
||
the two fish, you will eventually become aware that there is a
|
||
certain relationship between them.
|
||
|
||
When one turns, the other also makes a slightly different but
|
||
corresponding turn; when one faces the front, the other always faces
|
||
toward the side. If you remain unaware of the full scope of the
|
||
situation, you might even conclude that the fish must be
|
||
instantaneously communicating with one another, but this is clearly
|
||
not the case.
|
||
|
||
This, says Bohm, is precisely what is going on between the
|
||
subatomic particles in Aspect's experiment.
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
According to Bohm, the apparent faster-than-light connection
|
||
between subatomic particles is really telling us that there is a
|
||
deeper level of reality we are not privy to, a more complex
|
||
dimension beyond our own that is analogous to the aquarium. And, he
|
||
adds, we view objects such as subatomic particles as separate from
|
||
one another because we are seeing only a portion of their reality.
|
||
|
||
Such particles are not separate "parts", but facets of a deeper
|
||
and more underlying unity that is ultimately as holographic and
|
||
indivisible as the previously mentioned rose. And since everything
|
||
in physical reality is comprised of these "eidolons", the universe
|
||
is itself a projection, a hologram.
|
||
|
||
In addition to its phantomlike nature, such a universe would
|
||
possess other rather startling features. If the apparent
|
||
separateness of subatomic particles is illusory, it means that at a
|
||
deeper level of reality all things in the universe are infinitely
|
||
interconnected.
|
||
|
||
The electrons in a carbon atom in the human brain are connected
|
||
to the subatomic particles that comprise every salmon that swims,
|
||
every heart that beats, and every star that shimmers in the sky.
|
||
|
||
Everything interpenetrates everything, and although human
|
||
nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the
|
||
various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of
|
||
necessity artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web.
|
||
|
||
In a holographic universe, even time and space could no longer
|
||
be viewed as fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break
|
||
down in a universe in which nothing is truly separate from anything
|
||
else, time and three-dimensional space, like the images of the fish
|
||
on the TV monitors, would also have to be viewed as projections of
|
||
this deeper order.
|
||
|
||
At its deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which
|
||
the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. This
|
||
suggests that given the proper tools it might even be possible to
|
||
someday reach into the superholographic level of reality and pluck
|
||
out scenes from the long-forgotten past.
|
||
|
||
What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question.
|
||
Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the
|
||
matrix that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the
|
||
very least it contains every subatomic particle that has been or
|
||
will be -- every configuration of matter and energy that is
|
||
possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from blu<6C> whales to gamma
|
||
rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse of "All That
|
||
Is."
|
||
|
||
Although Bohm concedes that we have no way of knowing what else
|
||
might lie hidden in the superhologram, he does venture to say that
|
||
we have no reason to assume it does not contain more. Or as he puts
|
||
it, perhaps the superholographic level of reality is a "mere stage"
|
||
beyond which lies "an infinity of further development".
|
||
|
||
Bohm is not the only researcher who has found evidence that the
|
||
universe is a hologram. Working independently in the field of brain
|
||
research, Standford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has also become
|
||
|
||
Page 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
persuaded of the holographic nature of reality.
|
||
|
||
Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how
|
||
and where memories are stored in the brain. For decades numerous
|
||
studies have shown that rather than being confined to a specific
|
||
location, memories are dispersed throughout the brain.
|
||
|
||
In a series of landmark experiments in the 1920s, brain
|
||
scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter what portion of a rat's
|
||
brain he removed he was unable to eradicate its memory of how to
|
||
perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only
|
||
problem was that no one was able to come up with a mechanism that
|
||
might explain this curious "whole in every part" nature of memory
|
||
storage.
|
||
|
||
Then in the 1960s Pribram encountered the concept of holography
|
||
and realized he had found the explanation brain scientists had been
|
||
looking for. Pribram believes memories are encoded not in neurons,
|
||
or small groupings of neurons, but in patterns of nerve impulses
|
||
that crisscross the entire brain in the same way that patterns of
|
||
laser light interference crisscross the entire area of a piece of
|
||
film containing a holographic image. In other words, Pribram
|
||
believes the brain is itself a hologram.
|
||
|
||
Pribram's theory also explains how the human brain can store so
|
||
many memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the
|
||
human brain has the capacity to memorize something on the order of
|
||
10 billion bits of information during the average human lifetime (or
|
||
roughly the same amount of information contained in five sets of the
|
||
Encyclopaedia Britannica).
|
||
|
||
Similarly, it has been discovered that in addition to their
|
||
other capabilities, holograms possess an astounding capacity for
|
||
information storage--simply by changing the angle at which the two
|
||
lasers strike a piece of photographic film, it is possible to record
|
||
many different images on the same surface. It has been demonstrated
|
||
that one cubic centimeter of film can hold as many as 10 billion
|
||
bits of information.
|
||
|
||
Our uncanny ability to quickly retrieve whatever information we
|
||
need from the enormous store of our memories becomes more
|
||
understandable if the brain functions according to holographic
|
||
principles. If a friend asks you to tell him what comes to mind
|
||
when he says the word "zebra", you do not have to clumsily sort back<63>
|
||
through ome gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file to arrive at an
|
||
answer. Instead, associations like "striped", "horselike", and
|
||
"animal native to Africa" all pop into your head instantly.
|
||
|
||
Indeed, one of the most amazing things about the human thinking
|
||
process is that every piece of information seems instantly cross-
|
||
correlated with every other piece of information--another feature
|
||
intrinsic to the hologram. Because every portion of a hologram is
|
||
infinitely interconnected with ever other portion, it is perhaps
|
||
nature's supreme example of a cross-correlated system.
|
||
|
||
The storage of memory is not the only neurophysiological puzzle
|
||
that becomes more tractable in light of Pribram's holographic model
|
||
of the brain. Another is how the brain is able to translate the
|
||
avalanche of frequencies it receives via the senses (light
|
||
|
||
|