82 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
2
|
|
#2 07 Nov 87 07:51:00 [1] (PRIVATE) (KILL/SENT) $0.00
|
|
From: Ken Kaplan, 1:100/22, PCLUG, St Louis MO
|
|
To: Thom Henderson, 1:125/111
|
|
Subj: SEAdog Reply to Fido V12 Message
|
|
|
|
CC:Tom Jennings,John Hamilton
|
|
|
|
I think their may be a compatibilty problem with SEAdog replying to a message
|
|
generated by Fido V12. The first time it happened I thought it was a fluke.
|
|
But this is the second or third time that TJ has sent me direct netmail and
|
|
when I responded it tried to send the response back to 1:1/1 FidoNews. The
|
|
extended address on the message is INTL 1:100/22 1:125/111. I wonder if
|
|
somehow the 1:1(25)/1(11) the tens and hundreds digits are not being read by
|
|
SEAdog on Fido V12 generated messages. The "From:" displays properly but the
|
|
reply "To:" address (1:1/1) is sure wrong. Would you guys mind sending a few
|
|
messages back and forth to each other and see if you encounter the same
|
|
problem.
|
|
|
|
Thanks, - Ken -
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Via Opus 1:125/31 09 Nov 87 1:04:12
|
|
|
|
More[Y,n]
|
|
|
|
|
|
FidoNet Message Area 4: FidoNet
|
|
Command 1-24 (?=help) [2 N]:
|
|
#17 9 Nov 87 20:20:00 [1] (PRIVATE) (RECV'D) $0.00
|
|
From: Thom Henderson, 1:143/8, Fido's Kennel, San Jose CA
|
|
To: Tom Jennings, 1:125/111
|
|
See Also #24
|
|
Subj: Re: SEAdog Reply to Fido V12 Message
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from 107/6, SEAnet Relay of NY MetroNet, Clifton NJ
|
|
* Originally to John Hamilton on 143/8
|
|
|
|
> Whenever I <F4> reply to a message while in SEAdog v4.1
|
|
> that originated from a Fido v12 node, the reply message
|
|
> wants to go to 1:1/1 Fidonews!
|
|
|
|
Fido 12 appears to be putting in an interzone address, even when the message
|
|
is going to someone else in your zone. When SEAdog does a reply, it does not
|
|
check to see if the interzone address on the message to which you are
|
|
replying is from another zone (assuming that it is), and hence routes to the
|
|
"zone 1 to zone 1 gateway", or 1/1.
|
|
|
|
Bit of an oversight on both our parts.
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded by John Hamilton on 143/8, 06:42 11/10
|
|
|
|
More[Y,n]
|
|
|
|
FidoNet Message Area 4: FidoNet
|
|
Command 1-24 (?=help) [17 N]: +
|
|
#24 10 Nov 87 20:08:52 [1] (KILL/SENT) $0.26
|
|
From: Tom Jennings, 1:125/111
|
|
To: Thom Henderson, 1:143/8, Fido's Kennel, San Jose CA
|
|
Is Reply To #17
|
|
Subj: Re: SEAdog Reply to Fido V12 Message
|
|
|
|
Yeah ... the problem is that the INTL line is not documented. Oh well. I
|
|
think I've followed the letter & the spirit of the law as far as it goes: the
|
|
INTL line is the messages "full address", and integral part of messages since
|
|
day #1. In order for file attaches & zone gating to work, I hav to have
|
|
access to the full address at all times; and the INTL line provides this.
|
|
First Fido generates the messages addresses from the header, then completes
|
|
it from the IFNA Kludge if it exists.
|
|
|
|
The kludges presence shouldnt hurt anything; at worst, its redundant. Also,
|
|
its existence speeds up searching to see if there is one; if there is, the
|
|
search stops!
|
|
|
|
Is it possible for you to atoi() the dest zone number, and ignore it if
|
|
intrazone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More[Y,n]
|
|
FidoNet Message Area 4: FidoNet
|
|
Command 1-24 (?=help) [24 N]: |