114 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
114 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
Original Message Date: 28 Jan 92 08:25:19
|
||
From: Ron Dwight on 2:220/22
|
||
To: Tom Jennings on 1:125/111
|
||
Subj: Your registered marks.
|
||
^AINTL 1:125/111 2:220/22
|
||
Hi Tom,
|
||
here's a nice little excersize to think about. It's not <20>
|
||
hyperthetical
|
||
so a real answer would be appreciated but don't spend any money on lawyers.
|
||
|
||
We have a couple of guys in Finland who have started a small <20>
|
||
company. They have called that company, FidoNet Ky.
|
||
|
||
The "Ky" is a kind of registration somewhere between a <20>
|
||
"registered
|
||
trader" and a full blown incorporated company. The distinction is a bit <20>
|
||
weird
|
||
for me but anyway, ignore it for now.
|
||
|
||
The question is, where do you stand in this? Do you own the
|
||
"FidoNet" mark world-wide? Not that you would (Finnish law being what it <20>
|
||
is),
|
||
but could you force this company to change it's name? What happens if they
|
||
start to trade world-wide?
|
||
|
||
Your thoughts will make a few people happy over here. Thanks for <20>
|
||
yourtime.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Cheers,
|
||
|
||
Original Message Date: 28 Jan 92 08:25:19
|
||
From: Ron Dwight on 2:220/22
|
||
To: Tom Jennings on 1:125/111
|
||
Subj: Your registered marks.
|
||
^AINTL 1:125/111 2:220/22
|
||
Hi Tom,
|
||
here's a nice little excersize to think about. It's not <20>
|
||
hyperthetical
|
||
so a real answer would be appreciated but don't spend any money on lawyers.
|
||
|
||
We have a couple of guys in Finland who have started a small <20>
|
||
company. They have called that company, FidoNet Ky.
|
||
|
||
The "Ky" is a kind of registration somewhere between a <20>
|
||
"registered
|
||
trader" and a full blown incorporated company. The distinction is a bit <20>
|
||
weird
|
||
for me but anyway, ignore it for now.
|
||
|
||
The question is, where do you stand in this? Do you own the
|
||
"FidoNet" mark world-wide? Not that you would (Finnish law being what it <20>
|
||
is),
|
||
but could you force this company to change it's name? What happens if they
|
||
start to trade world-wide?
|
||
|
||
Your thoughts will make a few people happy over here. Thanks for <20>
|
||
yourtime.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Cheers,
|
||
|
||
Original Message Date: 04 Feb 92 00:34:38
|
||
From: tom jennings on 1:125/111
|
||
To: Ron Dwight on 2:220/22
|
||
Subj: re: Your registered marks.
|
||
^AINTL 2:220/22 1:125/111
|
||
> here's a nice little excersize to think about. It's
|
||
> not hyperthetical
|
||
> so a real answer would be appreciated but don't spend any
|
||
> money on lawyers.
|
||
|
||
Huh?! What does this mean? Is it a joke, or an intentional prod or
|
||
dare? (I will assume its merely poor wording.)
|
||
|
||
> We have a couple of guys in Finland who have
|
||
> started a small company. They have called that company,
|
||
> FidoNet Ky.
|
||
|
||
> The question is, where do you stand in this? Do
|
||
> you own the
|
||
> "FidoNet" mark world-wide? Not that you would (Finnish law
|
||
> being what it is),
|
||
> but could you force this company to change it's name? What
|
||
> happens if they
|
||
> start to trade world-wide?
|
||
|
||
I believe most European states have reciprocity agreements with US
|
||
govt patents and trademarks. If there stuff coems here, they will be
|
||
in direct violation of U.S. trademark law.
|
||
|
||
I would ask them please, do not name their company "FidoNet". Period.
|
||
Even if they find it strictly legal. It *is* misleading. (I use one of
|
||
the two best computer software trademark lawyers in the U.S.; I will
|
||
ask about it.)
|
||
|
||
And since you asked, if they persist, they will be on my shit list.
|
||
|
||
|
||
I hope *they* are using lawyers. I do. I take the trademark stuff VERY
|
||
seriously. It is the direct interest of the FidoNet members, all of
|
||
them, including them, and you, to keep the trademark unsullied. (ANd
|
||
it makes me *no money*, zero.) The trademark will be defended, I can
|
||
assure you of that.
|
||
|
||
I wouls ask you please to forward this message, or its contents,
|
||
interpreted, and let them know how important this is. It's not a joke
|
||
at all.
|
||
|
||
ANd if they insist, could you provide me with contact information?
|
||
(Actually, I'd like their address now, if you have it.)
|
||
|
||
|