2757 lines
120 KiB
Plaintext
2757 lines
120 KiB
Plaintext
F I D O N E W S -- Volume 14, Number 5 3 February 1997
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| The newsletter of the | ISSN 1198-4589 Published by: |
|
||
| FidoNet community | "FidoNews" |
|
||
| _ | 1-904-409-7040 [1:1/23] |
|
||
| / \ | |
|
||
| /|oo \ | |
|
||
| (_| /_) | |
|
||
| _`@/_ \ _ | |
|
||
| | | \ \\ | Editor: |
|
||
| | (*) | \ )) | Christopher Baker 1:18/14 |
|
||
| |__U__| / \// | |
|
||
| _//|| _\ / | |
|
||
| (_/(_|(____/ | |
|
||
| (jm) | Newspapers should have no friends. |
|
||
| | -- JOSEPH PULITZER |
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| Submission address: FidoNews Editor 1:1/23 |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| MORE addresses: |
|
||
| |
|
||
| submissions=> cbaker84@digital.net |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| For information, copyrights, article submissions, |
|
||
| obtaining copies of FidoNews or the internet gateway FAQ |
|
||
| please refer to the end of this file. |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
WHERE WAS THAT GROUNDHOG?
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
1. EDITORIAL ................................................ 1
|
||
Is it Phat or is it Jolly? ............................... 1
|
||
2. ARTICLES ................................................. 3
|
||
OpenDOS is Out! .......................................... 3
|
||
Fat-o-news? Call Jenny Craig! ............................ 6
|
||
3. GETTING TECHNICAL ........................................ 9
|
||
FSC-0028 - Note on Moving Files in FidoNet ............... 9
|
||
FSC-0030 - Message Identification & Reply ................ 21
|
||
FSC-0031 - Echomail dupe checking ........................ 25
|
||
FSC-0032 - Uniform Echomail Quoting ...................... 26
|
||
FSC-0033 - FidoNet Message ID Proposal ................... 27
|
||
4. COORDINATORS CORNER ...................................... 29
|
||
Nodelist-statistics as seen from Zone-2 for day 031 ...... 29
|
||
5. NET HUMOR ................................................ 30
|
||
An irreverent look at FidoLand hierarchy. :) ............ 30
|
||
What kind of Users do you have? .......................... 31
|
||
6. COMIX IN ASCII ........................................... 35
|
||
ASCII art goes hog wild? ................................. 35
|
||
7. NOTICES .................................................. 36
|
||
Future History ........................................... 36
|
||
8. FIDONET SOFTWARE LISTING ................................. 38
|
||
Latest Greatest Software Versions ........................ 38
|
||
9. FIDONEWS PUBLIC-KEY ...................................... 45
|
||
FidoNews PGP public-key listing .......................... 45
|
||
And more!
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 1 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
EDITORIAL
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
One of our readers takes the size of FidoNews to task in this Issue.
|
||
|
||
He doesn't say how long he's been around but only refers to the output
|
||
of Tees, the previous Editor as example of FidoNews size past.
|
||
|
||
Since Tees didn't bother to actively edit FidoNews many times, it's
|
||
hardly surprising many of his Issues were miniscule or Editorial only
|
||
phosphor padding.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews has been all sizes the past 13 years from 5K to 157K. Does it
|
||
really matter how big an Issue is uncompressed? Nobody has to read it;
|
||
part or all of it. Those who enjoy FidoNews for its potential [like
|
||
myself] make contributions to it to make it fun or useful. The History
|
||
and Standards series is part of what FidoNet is and many newbies and
|
||
Echomail weenies [those who only joined FidoNet for Echomail and don't
|
||
care or understand FidoNet's purpose] have never been exposed to this
|
||
material. It's FidoEducational. That's why it's here and why it's
|
||
going to keep going this way. There are FIVE FSCs in this Issue.
|
||
There are only sixty or so more to go. [grin]
|
||
|
||
The software list is also an important part of the FidoNews mission
|
||
and we all are indebted to Peter Popovich for the Herculean labors he
|
||
has made in organizing and maintaining that list. {Thanks, Peter!} In
|
||
these days of uncertified mailers and tossers giving headaches to the
|
||
entire Network from time to time, it's good to know what is available
|
||
and what does work. Even as many of the Echomail weenies flee FidoNet
|
||
for the apparently greener pastures of Internet mailing lists, there
|
||
are still BBS Sysops who need to know what is available for them if
|
||
they want to put up a system and become part of the World's First and
|
||
Largest Amateur BBS Network [and no, Bob, you don't have to run a BBS
|
||
to be a FidoNet Sysop]. It serves a purpose. It's in every Issue
|
||
because any one Issue may be the only one somebody sees.
|
||
|
||
There's an old saying that I don't agree with about doing and
|
||
teaching. It sez that those who can, do, and those who can't, teach.
|
||
That is incorrect. Those who can, do AND teach. Those who can't, get
|
||
jobs as critics. I'm doing and teaching. The lessons may be taken or
|
||
left at the reader's discretion. [grin]
|
||
|
||
Speaking of 'otherNets'[tm], it appears that the first major splinter
|
||
groups that broke from FidoNet to start true Utopian networks [cough]
|
||
have died from lack of interest or commitment. The first to go off was
|
||
AlterNet and it stopped publishing a nodelist as of Julian 010 this
|
||
year. You had to pay a tithe to belong to that one. It was the first
|
||
sourgrapesnet[r]. The second to splinter was EggNet. It didn't cost
|
||
anything but it was going to provide all the democratic ideals FidoNet
|
||
didn't. They even had a Supreme Court. It stopped publishing last year
|
||
as of Julian 138. Ten years ago, I told you so.
|
||
|
||
There never was any good reason for 'otherNets'[tm]. They were all
|
||
ego-driven fantasies of 'the way a network should be operated' when
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 2 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
FidoNet didn't move fast enough to suit them. Now, there are bunches
|
||
of them. Most of those are Echomail driven which was also unnecessary.
|
||
Several of those foolishly used Zone numbers under 10. That was very
|
||
short-sighted. FidoNet is bound to expand into those Zone numbers and
|
||
a lot of folks in 'otherNets'[tm] are going to start whining about
|
||
overlap and 2D addressing that can't tell one Zone's Nodes from
|
||
another. Boohoo. If they have any sense, they will shift up to Zone
|
||
numbers unlikely to be overrun by FidoNet Zones when expansion takes
|
||
place. With the demise of AlterNet's deliberate use of Zone 7, that
|
||
will be one less group of whiners to hear from. [grin]
|
||
|
||
Okay, that should generate some input. Those who complain about
|
||
FidoNews content should remember that THEY are dictating the content
|
||
with THEIR contributions. If they make none, their griping is
|
||
hollow. Those who can, DO. [chuckle]
|
||
|
||
C.B.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 3 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
ARTICLES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
Cindy Ingersoll
|
||
@ 1:107/71
|
||
|
||
http://www.caldera.com/dos/dos.htm
|
||
|
||
The secret is out! I just happen to catch the above URL on the #linux
|
||
channel of Undernet IRC, which points to OpenDOS! Let's let it speak
|
||
for itself, here are some blurbs:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS 7.0 is based on the Novell DOS 7.0 DOS operating
|
||
system, and expands on some of Novell's DOS' strengths.
|
||
|
||
OpenDOS:
|
||
|
||
* A genuine DOS (100% compatible)
|
||
* A Rommable DOS - designed from the start to execute out of ROM
|
||
* Fully featured - A comprehensive DOS utility set
|
||
* Complete with extensions - including drivers for CD-ROMs etc.
|
||
* Genuine multi-tasking, with API for developers
|
||
* Includes 286 DPMS memory manager in addition to DPMI
|
||
* Comprehensive Networking Client solution, NetWare 3.X, 4.X and
|
||
Personal NetWare
|
||
* Includes PC-based Personal NetWare Server
|
||
* Includes defacto Disk compression - STAC
|
||
* Includes new NetWars 2.0 network game
|
||
|
||
Availability
|
||
|
||
For private/evaluation and education use Caldera OpenDOS is
|
||
available for download from Calderas Web site - to [1]Download
|
||
Click Here BUT read our license agreement before downloading.
|
||
Downloading constitutes acceptance of Calderas terms and
|
||
conditions. For commercial and OEM usage of Caldera OpenDOS contact
|
||
Caldera sales for more information.
|
||
|
||
Return to [2]OpenDOS Main Menu
|
||
|
||
References
|
||
|
||
1. http://www.caldera.com/dos/html/opendoslicense.htm
|
||
2. http://www.caldera.com/dos/index.html
|
||
|
||
|
||
.....................................................................
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS Programming Documentation
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS 7.0 is a complete DOS operating system.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 4 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Consequently you can use all the available DOS development tools
|
||
for the platform, allowing creation of software that will run on
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS, MS-DOS, and DR DOS versions. In addition Caldera
|
||
OpenDOS provides extensions that allow your application greater
|
||
flexibility.
|
||
|
||
Example additional features include:
|
||
|
||
* Multi-tasking
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS provides a full multi-tasking environment on
|
||
Pentium, 486, or 386-based harware. This is built into the memory
|
||
management extensions provided in the operating system, and is
|
||
accessible for standard un-aware applications when using the
|
||
Taskmanager (Taskmgr) utility. Programs however can have direct
|
||
access to create separate threads etc, via the extended Application
|
||
Programming Interface.
|
||
|
||
* DPMS
|
||
|
||
A memory manager that even works on 286-based Pcs, allowing device
|
||
drivers to reside outside of the regular DOS application area.
|
||
Drivers or Terminate and stay resident applications can thereby
|
||
avoid using valuable application memory,
|
||
|
||
* Romming tools
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS is the ideal embedded DOS system, designed for
|
||
straightforward out-of-the-box romming. Caldera will also be making
|
||
these tools available for prototyping embedded systems. If you wish
|
||
to use Caldera OpenDOS in your embedded application contact Caldera
|
||
Sales for more information
|
||
|
||
|
||
.....................................................................
|
||
|
||
Caldera Ships OpenDOS 7.01 for Free Internet Download
|
||
|
||
|
||
New DOS Version Provided Free for Non-commercial use. Caldera
|
||
OpenDOS makes a Solid, Low-Cost Solution for Running Windows 3.X
|
||
Applications and DOS Applications on Intel and Compatible-based
|
||
Workstations
|
||
|
||
Andover, UK and Provo Utah, USA
|
||
|
||
January 27, 1997
|
||
|
||
Caldera Inc. today shipped Caldera OpenDOS 7.01. OpenDOS is the
|
||
first Caldera Release of DOS, based on the Novell DOS 7 technology
|
||
acquired from Novell in 1996. The release is notable as it is the
|
||
first commercial DOS Operating System to be downloadable from the
|
||
Internet. OpenDOS is a true DOS operating system, supporting all
|
||
DOS applications including Microsoft Windows applications, and
|
||
networking systems including Novell NetWare, Windows for
|
||
Workgroups, and LANtastic.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 5 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Caldera OpenDOS comes complete with comprehensive networkability.
|
||
The inclusion of Novell Personal NetWare means that OpenDOS fulfils
|
||
all DOS workgroup requirements. End-users can easily network their
|
||
PCs. It even includes a brand-new version of the NetWars Arcade
|
||
game for single or multiuser use.
|
||
|
||
"OpenDOS underlines Calderas commitment to making essential
|
||
technology openly available as widely as possible" commented Jon
|
||
Williams, Director of Marketing of Caldera UK Ltd. "Non-commercial
|
||
users can download the latest DOS direct from our Web site.
|
||
Commercial users and OEMs can download the system for evaluation
|
||
and easily test-integrate into their solutions"
|
||
|
||
"Caldera OpenDOS 7.01 represents the first 're-generation' of DOS
|
||
Operating Systems, with its particular suitability to specialist
|
||
OEM applications" he continued (The DRDOS product line that OpenDOS
|
||
is derived from was the first purposely ROMmable DOS with industry
|
||
leading features like power management)
|
||
|
||
Brian Sparks, President and CEO Caldera Inc. said "Caldera is
|
||
working with the Internet community to make productive commercial
|
||
systems as open and available as possible. Dependable and reliable
|
||
commercial systems software such as OpenLinux and OpenDOS are
|
||
enabling users to make affordable and open choices on which to base
|
||
their business solutions."
|
||
|
||
Caldera uses its own technological and marketing resources to
|
||
leverage technologies including the Linux operating system created
|
||
by independent developers worldwide, and the OpenDOS product range.
|
||
Visit the Caldera web site at [2]http://www.caldera.com/. For
|
||
orders and information call (800) 850-7779 in the US or +1 801 269
|
||
7012 internationally.
|
||
|
||
Caldera is a registered trademark; and Caldera OpenLinux, Caldera
|
||
Network Desktop, Caldera Solutions CD and Caldera OpenDOS are
|
||
trademarks of Caldera Inc. NetWare and Personal NetWare are
|
||
registered trademarks of Novell Inc, Microsoft, Microsoft Windows,
|
||
and Microsoft Windows for Workgroups are trademarks or registered
|
||
trademarks of Microsoft Inc., UNIX is a registered trademark, in
|
||
the United States and other countries, licensed exclusively through
|
||
X/OPEN Company Limited. Netscape Communications, the Netscape
|
||
Communications logo, Netscape and Netscape Navigator are trademarks
|
||
of Netscape Communications Corporation. All other products,
|
||
services, companies and publications are trademarks or registered
|
||
trademarks of their respective owners.
|
||
|
||
Press Contacts:
|
||
|
||
Europe: Jon Williams - Director of Marketing Tel: +44 1488 71945 or
|
||
+44 385 317 477
|
||
|
||
Email: jonw@caldera.com
|
||
|
||
USA and Rest Of World: Lyle Ball - Marcoms Manager Tel +1 801 377
|
||
7687
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 6 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Email: lyle@caldera.com
|
||
|
||
Contact: [3]info@caldera.com
|
||
|
||
References
|
||
|
||
1. http://www.caldera.com/dos/gifs/caldico.gif
|
||
2. http://www.caldera.com/
|
||
3. mailto:info@caldera.com
|
||
|
||
CiAo
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
Fidonews, The "lard ass" of newsletters
|
||
by gary gilmore, 1:2410/400
|
||
|
||
First off, let me say, I take nothing away from Chris on running
|
||
Fidonews. I know it's not easy to produce, and I know he's trying
|
||
hard. I didn't see a mass rush of people volunteering to take it
|
||
over when Sylvia/Don gave it up.
|
||
|
||
OK, enough of the prefacing... time to get out the axe. <grin>
|
||
|
||
A few of the locals here were talking about Fidonews, and mentioning
|
||
how much larger it's gotten... unfortunately, that's mostly due to
|
||
a bunch of bloated junk that I'm willing to bet a majority doesn't
|
||
care about.
|
||
|
||
Just for the hell of it, I took this week's news and did a little
|
||
slash and burn to it.
|
||
|
||
FIDO1404.NWS 123592 01-27-97
|
||
|
||
That's the whole enchilada, all the poop included. Hefty, eh?
|
||
Wait.. there's more.
|
||
|
||
Lets remove the huge "how to get Fidonews from every place in
|
||
the world that we know of & Internet addresses of those that
|
||
can spell 'Fidonews'" listing, the "Jurassic park" section
|
||
(those FTSC documents that were originally written on stone tablets
|
||
by guys with modems that had tubes in them), and the oh-so-popular
|
||
"All the software in the world that has the word "mail" somewhere
|
||
in it's source code" segment, oh, I left in some "humor" <ahem>
|
||
that probably managed to offend most everyone who might be a
|
||
Fidonet sysop. (Not only was that emailed to almost the entire
|
||
world, it wasn't funny the first time I saw it.)
|
||
|
||
FIDO1404.NWS 27118 1-28-97
|
||
|
||
Whoops! What happened? Fidonews gets anorexic!
|
||
|
||
Now again, I don't -really- want to bash the Snooze.. honest.
|
||
I'm one of the few weirdos that actually bother reading it weekly.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 7 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
(Of course, I also like to read the nodelist now and then, so
|
||
go figure...)
|
||
|
||
Honestly though.. do we really need reprints of FTSC docs? If
|
||
someone wants them, there's many, many places that offer them
|
||
up for reading. Fer chrissakes, there's even a listing of the
|
||
FTSC Internet site! (Though where's the FIDOnet listing for it?)
|
||
About the only people that DO want to read them are programmers,
|
||
or those preparing to "go after someone" over some arcane
|
||
specification. Do we really need them in Fidonews? I don't
|
||
think so. I'll betcha that most folks just PgDwn furiously past
|
||
them.
|
||
|
||
How about the giant PGP key? Have we -really- had a huge problem
|
||
in the past with "bogus" copies of Fidonews? Oh please... I have
|
||
to laugh just imagining some kiddies whipping out a Fidonews
|
||
proclaiming himself the new International Coordinator or writing
|
||
that Bruce Bodger and Bob Satti were seen on a plane with Bigfoot
|
||
and Elvis, and that John Souvestre has moved in with Steve Winter.
|
||
Bwaahahaha! :-)
|
||
|
||
(Hmmm... come to think of it, I think I'd -rather- read an issue
|
||
like that...)
|
||
|
||
Uhhh, I don't think there's much doubt on the "authenticity" of
|
||
the Fidonews I get, so I don't think we need to bloat with a
|
||
huge key in every issue. Hell, just use AV mode when you Zip it
|
||
up... that'll do nicely. (Oh, gahead... tell me how you can crack
|
||
a zip password... yep, I'll bet there's LOTS of people dying to do
|
||
that with Fidonews too! <laugh>)
|
||
|
||
Today in history... umm, do I -really- need to know what's happening
|
||
in 2000? Do I care? Should I jot it down in my Dayrunner?
|
||
OK, ok... whatever, but how about limiting it to 6mo in advance?
|
||
That's fair. Oh, and while we're at it, how about something like
|
||
"Zone 1 Mail hour changes for areas observing Daylight Savings
|
||
Time"... or something that REALLY would be helpful/matters to the
|
||
Fidonet sysop. Ain't this "FIDOnews"?
|
||
|
||
Peter E. Popovich.. bless him. Nice guy. But do we -really- need
|
||
him to go to all the trouble of submitting this encyclopedia-sized
|
||
listing each and every week? C'mon, some of this software hasn't
|
||
been updated in four -years-, so why not just let Peter send in one
|
||
listing every four -weeks-. I think that's fair, and gives Peter
|
||
some rest.
|
||
|
||
Jim Henry.. Hey! Here's a guy in FIDOnews talking about FIDOnet!
|
||
Imagine! Hurrah for Jim! I don't own a palmtop, but I might just
|
||
turn his echo for being one of the FEW things in this issue that is
|
||
FIDOnet related, not INTERnet.
|
||
|
||
Oh, Internet? Geez, hey, you forgot to list that our net's home page
|
||
also has a link to Fidonews. Oh, and Infoseek? I'll also find the
|
||
phrase "Fidonews" too, so let's not leave them out..
|
||
|
||
(Get the idea?) Auugh! Do I -have- to be told each and every place
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 8 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
in the galaxy that I can find Fidonews, or each place that has
|
||
another dreary all-black "Fidonet" web page? (Hmm, is that an
|
||
oxymoron? "Fidonet web page"?) Doesn't POLICY4 (you know, it relates
|
||
to FIDOnet) say that my NC has to give me Fidonews if I want it?
|
||
(Well, I -am- the NC here, but you know what I'm saying..) I notice
|
||
that of all the junk about where I can get Fidonews, I don't see one
|
||
mention of the -main- way to get it... the FIDONEWS file echo.
|
||
<knock knock> Hello? Anyone there?
|
||
|
||
Sheesh, do we have an Internet boner or what?
|
||
|
||
I think there's also something inherently wrong with FIDOnews in
|
||
HTML format. I dunno, but all this Internet all over FIDOnet makes
|
||
me itch. Umm, it happens to be that beloved Internet that's
|
||
shrinking our ranks, for the most part.
|
||
|
||
Is it too much to ask that FIDOnews do more coverage of FIDOnet, and
|
||
-not- the Internet? If it doesn't, lets just change the name of it
|
||
to INTERnews, and be done with it. After all, it -does- say "The
|
||
newsletter of the FidoNet community", doesn't it? <sigh>
|
||
|
||
Sure, many want to put Internet features in their BBS systems.
|
||
That's great. Keeping up on the bleeding edge of technology and all,
|
||
but where's the "how to gate newsgroups into your Fidonet BBS"
|
||
articles, or "How to gate email into your Fidonet BBS"... (note that
|
||
I say "into your Fidonet BBS" a lot there... that's because it's
|
||
what Fidonews should be concerned about.
|
||
|
||
What's the point of this behemoth article? Simple. A little less
|
||
INTERnet in my FIDOnews, please. A little less rehashing of old
|
||
crap, and ancient postings. (I'll also kill you if you post more
|
||
damned childlike ASCII "artwork"... Christ, that's so lame. My
|
||
cat's litterbox has better artwork in it.) A little less bloat and
|
||
needless information, and more FIDO-related meat in the S'nooze,
|
||
please.
|
||
|
||
If this means some issues will be slim, then so be it. No problem.
|
||
Donald Tees had some issues that were nothing more than an editorial,
|
||
but know what? They were -good- editorials, and worth reading.
|
||
At least he didn't include reprints of "My favorite nodediffs from
|
||
1988-1990" just to keep the size up. Let it be what it will be,
|
||
and let it be FIDOnet related first and foremost.
|
||
|
||
Again, I like Fidonews, and I hope no one will be offended by all
|
||
this rambling. If you are, well, go read "The history of nodelist
|
||
flags in Guam and Easter Island" for a while until you get over it.
|
||
(Or wait until it's reprinted in Fidonews. <laugh>)
|
||
|
||
As they say, "Flames>nul". :-)
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 9 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
GETTING TECHNICAL
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
[This is part of a continuing series publishing FidoNet Standards and
|
||
Proposals submitted to the FTSC. It is also part of the FidoNet
|
||
History series. These have been reformatted to 70 columns as
|
||
required.] Ed.
|
||
|
||
FSC-0028
|
||
|
||
FwdSpec - A Collection of Notes on Moving Files in FidoNet
|
||
|
||
Preamble
|
||
|
||
Copyright 1988 Greylock Software, Inc.
|
||
|
||
POBox 730
|
||
Gt Barrington MA 01230
|
||
|
||
FidoNet>1:321/202.0
|
||
|
||
|
||
Synopsis
|
||
|
||
This started as a reverse-engineered technical description of the
|
||
core operations of Ron Bemis' Flea program, and an attempt to
|
||
formulate a new specification which is a more symmetric superset
|
||
of that functionality. Specifications for Mr. Bemis software is
|
||
available with that software, which is not freely distributed.
|
||
|
||
This document ONLY addresses the format of files transferred
|
||
between systems. It does not address configuration information,
|
||
which is really an implementation specific issue.
|
||
|
||
This is currently only a base for discussion, which should be
|
||
carried on in the SOFTWARE (SDS) and FTSC conferences.
|
||
|
||
Distribution
|
||
|
||
This document may be freely distributed, so long as it is
|
||
complete.
|
||
|
||
Comments should be directed to:
|
||
|
||
Barry Geller: 266/12
|
||
Tom Hendricks: 261/662
|
||
Harry Lee: 321/202
|
||
Rick Moore: 115/333
|
||
|
||
1 General
|
||
|
||
1.1 Existing Tools
|
||
|
||
1.1.1 FileFwd
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 10 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
FileFwd is a program by Joe Keenan whose primary purpose is to
|
||
move consistently named files on a routed, regular basis. It is
|
||
extremely useful for routing echomail packets through intermediate
|
||
nodes without unpacking and re-packing at each of the stations.
|
||
|
||
1.1.2 Flea
|
||
|
||
Flea is a program created by Ron Bemis which is used to broadcast
|
||
files in a manner similar to EchoMail. It is the primary tool
|
||
used by the FidoNet Software Distribution System.
|
||
|
||
Specifications for the Flea program are ostensibly available from
|
||
the author.
|
||
|
||
1.1.3 GlueFwd
|
||
|
||
GlueFwd is a distributed document control system from Greylock
|
||
Software that was considered and rejected for use by the FidoNet
|
||
Software Distribution System.
|
||
|
||
Unlike Flea and Tick, GlueFwd uses messages to contain the
|
||
associated routing information.
|
||
|
||
1.1.4 Tick
|
||
|
||
Tick is a program by Barry Geller, which performs approximately
|
||
the same functions as Flea, but uses a unique associated
|
||
information file format.
|
||
|
||
1.2 Basics
|
||
|
||
1.2.1 Associated Routing Information
|
||
|
||
There are a number of problems associated with file routing,
|
||
either point to point, or broadcast. The basic problem is how to
|
||
handle the associated routing information. The approaches involve
|
||
a spectrum ranging from information contained ONLY on the systems
|
||
handling the files to carrying the information WITH the files
|
||
being handled.
|
||
|
||
In addition, there is the choice of how this information is to be
|
||
conveyed. The choices range from associated files, to messages.
|
||
|
||
1.2.2 Name Collisions
|
||
|
||
1.2.3 Larva - starting the process
|
||
|
||
The "Larva" process is usually invoked by the user at the command
|
||
line. This is how a file is put in motion. It creates the
|
||
appropriate outbound .Fle files and the file attach information
|
||
required by the given mailer environment.
|
||
|
||
1.2.4 Flea - moving stuff along
|
||
|
||
The "Flea" process is the one that moves the files along. It does
|
||
the following:
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 11 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Check the inbound for .Pre file, and process any that are
|
||
releasable as you would a normal .Fle file
|
||
|
||
Check the inbound for .Fle files, and process each as follows:
|
||
|
||
Parse the .Fle file, making sure its associate file exists, it
|
||
comes from a valid source, and that it is not a pre-release. If
|
||
any of those conditions are violated, the file is renamed either
|
||
to .Bad or .Pre.
|
||
|
||
If all is well, move the file to the appropriate path associated
|
||
with the area, and, if possible, update the FILES.BBS file.
|
||
|
||
Using a Larva-like process, send the file along to any nodes in
|
||
your echo list that have not seen the file.
|
||
|
||
A Flea process is generally run whenever inbound mail is received.
|
||
|
||
1.3 Nomenclature
|
||
|
||
1.3.1 [Required]
|
||
|
||
1.3.2 {Optional}
|
||
|
||
1.3.3 Address: {Domain>}{Zone:}Net/Node{.Point}
|
||
|
||
In the context of Flea 2.x, only Net/Node style addressing is
|
||
supported.
|
||
|
||
1.3.4 Dates
|
||
|
||
|
||
2 New Forwarding Format (TICK)
|
||
|
||
2.1 General Goals
|
||
|
||
2.1.1 Removing order dependency
|
||
|
||
The current structure of .Fle files is very order dependent. In
|
||
some cases, .Fle file lines have verbs, in others, they do not.
|
||
Presumably, Flea proper will have problems processing lines beyond
|
||
the description that are not in the proper order.
|
||
|
||
This weakness should be eliminated, essentially by insisting on a
|
||
verb per line, which makes possible free-form parsing, eliminating
|
||
order dependency. Within some groups of entries with the same
|
||
verb, order dependency may be required.
|
||
|
||
2.1.2 Limiting the type of information contained in a given datum
|
||
|
||
Flea 2.x very often carries different types of information on a
|
||
given line. While on the surface, this seems like an economical
|
||
way to do things, it can lead to complications later on.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, it is a general design goal to keep the type and use of
|
||
a given datum associated with a given verb very clean.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 12 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.1.3 Removing Case Sensitivity
|
||
|
||
Flea is currently very case sensitive. Software should be soft.
|
||
|
||
An argument has been made that case sensitivity is a protection
|
||
against bad files being inserted into the system. If someone
|
||
wants to generate a trojan horse, they will need passwords (the
|
||
primary protection), and in all likelihood would use some sort of
|
||
Larval tool to generate it anyway. Case sensitivity makes it
|
||
slightly more difficult for a developer to "enter the fray".
|
||
|
||
2.1.4 Removing Inconsistent Colon Usage
|
||
|
||
Flea currently is haphazard in its usage of colons after verbs.
|
||
Colons should be made optional (or eliminated) on all verbs.
|
||
|
||
2.1.5 Optional Multiple DESC lines
|
||
|
||
Flea currently supports a single description line, which is
|
||
additionally position sensitive. By creating a DESC verb, the
|
||
position sensitivity can be eliminated, and multiple DESC lines
|
||
can optionally be supported.
|
||
|
||
At the current time, .Tic files use the DESC verb, but multiple
|
||
DESC lines are not permitted. Minimal compliance will be to
|
||
handle one; multiple lines will be addressed later.
|
||
|
||
2.1.6 App (Application) line support
|
||
|
||
In general, all mechanisms in FidoNet should allow for
|
||
growth/variation by other developers in a non-harmful manner.
|
||
|
||
In the case of Flea routing files, an APP verb with non-specific
|
||
data should be provided for. For example, let's assume that UPCL
|
||
supports some sort of a "return receipt" functionality - when a
|
||
file hits you, so long as it's posted to your area, and with the
|
||
sysop's consent (in the form of a configuration option), a message
|
||
is sent to the Origin node.
|
||
|
||
This might be done as follows:
|
||
|
||
APP GREYLOCK Return-Receipt
|
||
|
||
The "Greylock" sub-verb would keep APP conflicts from occurring.
|
||
|
||
Processors other than UPCL would pass the line through to any
|
||
rebroadcast .Tic files intact. (In fact, so would UPCL.)
|
||
|
||
App lines, taken as a group, are order dependent. A Tick
|
||
processor should output App lines created during forwarding in the
|
||
same order they read them, and if a Tick processor creates new App
|
||
lines, they should be added to the end of the existing App line
|
||
list.
|
||
|
||
Once the majority of processors support a given APP functionality,
|
||
it might be moved to the spec proper.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 13 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Indeed, any lines with "unrecognized verbs" should be passed
|
||
through intact, and in the order encountered.
|
||
|
||
2.1.7 Use of PATH construct rather than sby kludge
|
||
|
||
Seenby information is more easily digested by humans (and
|
||
programs) if it is sorted. Unfortunately, such sorting removes
|
||
the ability to use it for both seenby, and path information as it
|
||
is in Flea 2.2. In addition, the mechanism used by Flea 2.2
|
||
precludes tiny seenby's, or Zone gating.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, a PATH construct, much like an EchoMail PATH line
|
||
should be used, instead of the current mechanism. Once again,
|
||
order dependency should be discouraged. Within a group of path
|
||
lines, obviously, order is important.
|
||
|
||
2.1.8 Multiple Sby's per Sby line
|
||
|
||
The current seen-by construct, with one seenby per line, with the
|
||
word seen-by required on each line is hideously inefficient.
|
||
|
||
This should be changed to mimic echomail's seen-by handling, where
|
||
multiple seenby's are contained on each line, up to 78 or so
|
||
characters worth.
|
||
|
||
A possible reason to keep the seenby down to a single entry per
|
||
line is if information on how and when that node got the file is
|
||
to be included. While this might be worth considering, it will
|
||
add considerable weight to the .Fle file.
|
||
|
||
At the current time, Tick files are assumed to have one seen-by
|
||
per line.
|
||
|
||
2.1.9 Full (Optional) Domain, Zone, and Point support
|
||
|
||
In order to allow for the future growth of the network, and
|
||
interactions with other networks, addresses should be able to
|
||
contain a fully qualified FidoNet address:
|
||
|
||
Domain>Zone:Net/Node.Point.
|
||
|
||
Further, given that many authors' primary machines are points, the
|
||
result is as shown in the sample above: completely unknown
|
||
addresses appearing in the .Fle files.
|
||
|
||
Of course, these should not be required, but used as necessary.
|
||
|
||
At the current time, Domains are completely unsupported, and
|
||
should not be used.
|
||
|
||
2.1.10 Different extensions to avoid problems with Opus Style
|
||
Outbound
|
||
|
||
The extension .Fle was chosen because it leads to some expedient
|
||
side effects in the form of file truncation/elimination by Opus or
|
||
Binkley when the files reside in the outbound directory.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 14 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
On the other hand, both Opus and Binkley explicitly specify their
|
||
outbound areas should be used ONLY for that. A number of
|
||
Binkley/Opus developers have expressed concern with this problem.
|
||
|
||
For this, and other reasons, .Fle files should be given a new
|
||
extension of some sort, one that is not closely related to the
|
||
commonly used routing/message file extensions. In addition,
|
||
rather than the three divergent extensions now used by Flea (.Fle,
|
||
.Bad, and .Pre), any and all extensions used by file routers based
|
||
on this technology should use extensions that are more closely
|
||
grouped.
|
||
|
||
As an ancillary note, the FTSC should consider a "File
|
||
Specification Pattern Registry". This would not be limited to
|
||
network tools, and it would not be an indication of ownership, it
|
||
would simply be a reference.
|
||
|
||
2.1.11 RFC-822 Format
|
||
|
||
It might make some sense to consider using an RFC-822 compatible
|
||
format for these files. In a future version of this document,
|
||
I'll detail this possibility.
|
||
|
||
It would also be nice from the point of view of implementing a
|
||
similar system on UseNet/Internet flavored systems.
|
||
|
||
2.1.12 Valid pairing of associated info file and file proper
|
||
|
||
We need a mechanism to insure that the primary file and the
|
||
associated information file are a valid pairing.
|
||
|
||
Consider the following scenario ...
|
||
|
||
System allows overwrites. A file and associated .Tic arrive.
|
||
They are, for whatever reason, not processed. A file by the same
|
||
name comes in. The pair is no longer valid, but given current
|
||
technology, it would be passed along.
|
||
|
||
2.2 Considerations
|
||
|
||
2.2.1 Up and downness
|
||
|
||
2.2.1.1 Single Uplink
|
||
|
||
2.2.2 Table driven duplicate elimination
|
||
|
||
2.2.3 Mapping between distribution and on-line organization
|
||
|
||
There is a problem in the current implementation in that the local
|
||
organization of a system tends to defeat the duplicate catching
|
||
aspects of the system.
|
||
|
||
I.E., the SDS currently sends out ALL FidoNet files in one
|
||
"channel". Many systems move files of this category or that to
|
||
unique directories.
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 15 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.2.4 Many features are intended for local optional implementation
|
||
|
||
Many of the features in this specification obviously affect how
|
||
individual sysops run their systems. As such, these features
|
||
should be optionally supported by each sysop, although the
|
||
information should be passed through the associated information
|
||
file regardless of whether or not they support the feature.
|
||
|
||
2.3 Schematic of .Tic file
|
||
|
||
Area{:} [AreaName]
|
||
{Release{:} [Time]}
|
||
{Replaces{:} [FileName]}
|
||
File{:} [FileName]
|
||
DESC{:} [Description]
|
||
{DESC{:} [Description]}
|
||
{Size{:} [Bytes]}
|
||
{Date{:} [FileDate]}
|
||
{CRC{:} [Calculated CRC-32 (in hex?)]}
|
||
Origin{:} [Address]
|
||
From{:} [Address] [Pwd]
|
||
{Created{:} [Program Banner]}
|
||
Seenby{:} [Address] {Address} ...
|
||
{Seenby{:} [Address] {Address} ...}
|
||
{APP{:} [Application Specific Information]}
|
||
Path{:} [Address] {Address} ...
|
||
{Path{:} [Address] {Address} ...}
|
||
|
||
Note this file is NOT order dependent. Some of the newer features
|
||
are more for discussion than anything else.
|
||
|
||
2.4 Nomenclature and Rules
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Address Format: Zone:Net/Node{.Point}
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Don't Barf on appended or unknown stuff
|
||
|
||
Lines that are unrecognizable (i.e., non-existent or non-supported
|
||
verbs) should be passed through untouched.
|
||
|
||
Lines that have additional data beyond the required data
|
||
(separated by whitespace) should not cause the system to fail,
|
||
although it is obviously difficult to pass this information
|
||
through.
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 One or zero items of a given type unless otherwise specified
|
||
|
||
2.4.4 Simple ASCII Alphabet
|
||
|
||
2.4.5 Unix Date Time Formats
|
||
|
||
All times are expressed as a long decimal in Unix format - the
|
||
number of seconds since 1970.
|
||
|
||
2.4.6 [Required Data]
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 16 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.4.7 {Optional Data}
|
||
|
||
2.5 Detail
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 App [Ref] {Info}
|
||
|
||
This is a "pass through" line to allow developers some room for
|
||
development without breaking other developer's work.
|
||
|
||
An APP line should have the following form:
|
||
|
||
APP [AppRef] {App Information}
|
||
|
||
or
|
||
|
||
APPLICATION [AppRef] {App Information}
|
||
|
||
Application lines should have their order preserved, and
|
||
applications adding lines should do so at the end of the existing
|
||
application list.
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Area [Name]
|
||
|
||
Area names should probably be limited to 8 characters, with
|
||
alphabet restrictions, to simplify their implementation.
|
||
|
||
This is a mandatory line, and only one should exist in the file.
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Author [Name]
|
||
|
||
This is an item for discussion.
|
||
|
||
2.5.4 CRC [Decimal CRC Value]
|
||
|
||
As .Fle files stand, it is possible to "slip something in" to the
|
||
pipe, particularly if .Fle files are processed only once in a
|
||
while as opposed to after each inbound call.
|
||
|
||
A number of the proposed (and optional) features here provide
|
||
safeguards against this. Specifically, computing the file CRC,
|
||
and preserving the original file date and size in the .Tic file.
|
||
|
||
This has some value as a verification tool, without the legal
|
||
encumbrances of PKSCrypt, etc.
|
||
|
||
This probably should be a CRC-32 value. This would also closely
|
||
follow some of the ideas that are being considered for echomail
|
||
processing.
|
||
|
||
This is currently a point for discussion. It probably should be a
|
||
mandatory field.
|
||
|
||
2.5.5 Created [Program Banner]
|
||
|
||
This should contain some program identification information of the
|
||
program that generated the attach information.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 17 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
There might be some standard format for the first part of this
|
||
line, allowing for variant information after this.
|
||
|
||
This is an optional line.
|
||
|
||
2.5.6 Date [Date/Time of creation]
|
||
|
||
This is a check for valid file pairing between the associated
|
||
information file and the primary file. It is the file date stamp
|
||
of the primary file in Unix format.
|
||
|
||
2.5.7 Desc [File Description]
|
||
|
||
This is a description of the file. There is as yet unspecified
|
||
length restriction on this line.
|
||
|
||
At the current time, exactly one of these lines should appear in
|
||
the Tick file.
|
||
|
||
In the future, more than one line may be supported.
|
||
|
||
2.5.8 Dest [Address]
|
||
|
||
This is related to Route (qv)
|
||
|
||
2.5.9 Encrypted [PKS Key]
|
||
|
||
Read the section on "GARBLE", and change it as follows:
|
||
|
||
The file is initially encrypted using a PKS style encryption.
|
||
This would be the ONLY time the file is encrypted. The FTSC or
|
||
someone would have to collect a list of valid public keys of
|
||
authors (and probably eventually everyone). The file would then
|
||
be of "known-quality", or at least from a known source. The key
|
||
would be included in the .Tic file for ease of operation.
|
||
|
||
The ramifications of this are considerable. First off, PKSCrypt
|
||
is something the spook types in the world are bothered by.
|
||
Secondly, the source is not available, and the program does not
|
||
work on some machines (i.e., my 386.) Large keys would probably
|
||
have to be used so a large number of possible keys will exist,
|
||
which means considerable encryption and decryption processing
|
||
time. Finally, there is the question of a "Key registry", and how
|
||
you verify them.
|
||
|
||
I am not sure if this and Garbled are and/or or either/or.
|
||
|
||
2.5.10 File [FileName]
|
||
|
||
ONLY a filename (no path information) is contained on the FILE
|
||
line. No wildcards.
|
||
|
||
Exactly one of these lines must exist in a Tick file.
|
||
|
||
2.5.11 From [Address]
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 18 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
This is the address of the system sending the file on the current
|
||
leg.
|
||
|
||
2.5.12 Garbled
|
||
|
||
This is really just a thought for consideration than anything
|
||
else.
|
||
|
||
If this is present, the file referenced by the .Tic file is
|
||
assumed to be archived (we'd have to address the issue of
|
||
"deviant" archivers") by an agreed upon password between the
|
||
sender and the sendee.
|
||
|
||
The ramifications of this are considerable. It would mean that
|
||
individual archives would need to be created for any node so
|
||
protected, which would need to be deleted after sending. This
|
||
implies a considerable expenditure of time and resources to create
|
||
and store these archives.
|
||
|
||
2.5.13 Log [Comment]
|
||
|
||
This is another one for consideration. Any such lines would be
|
||
displayed on the console and/or the system log.
|
||
|
||
2.5.14 Magic [FileName]
|
||
|
||
This is food for thought.
|
||
|
||
In order to resolve and standardize version numbering in file
|
||
names, and magic file names, this might be used to distribute a
|
||
"magic file name" with a given file.
|
||
|
||
More than one of these lines might exist.
|
||
|
||
2.5.15 Origin [Address]
|
||
|
||
Where the file originally entered the system.
|
||
|
||
2.5.16 Path [Address] {Arrival}
|
||
|
||
Path lines are, among themselves, order dependent. However, they
|
||
need not be contiguous.
|
||
|
||
The current path specification allows for only one address per
|
||
path statement.
|
||
|
||
It might make sense to leave it this way, and add an "Arrival
|
||
time", which would be the time the file was processed.
|
||
|
||
I.E., the file would start out with the path for this node and the
|
||
next node with the time of creation. When it gets to the next
|
||
node, he changes his time to the time of processing, and puts out
|
||
a similar line for the node(s) he sends to.
|
||
|
||
2.5.17 Pw [Password]
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 19 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
This is the password between the sender and the sendee. This
|
||
password is not case sensitive.
|
||
|
||
Exactly one of these lines must exist in a Tick file.
|
||
|
||
It would be nice to have some method of password securing that did
|
||
not require the password to be exchanged in clear text.
|
||
|
||
2.5.18 Release [DateTime]
|
||
|
||
This is an optional line used to contain a Unix Date Time (seconds
|
||
since 1970) of the release of the file.
|
||
|
||
The handling of this is really murky as far as I can tell. A
|
||
brief digression into "political structures."
|
||
|
||
Let's consider the case of the SDS. In SDS, it has generally been
|
||
assumed that ONLY nodes that are a part of the SDS get their files
|
||
using Flea/Tick technology. However, whether it is aware of it or
|
||
not, this is not the case.
|
||
|
||
Here's what I think was intended: a file comes in with a
|
||
Pre-release time set. That is the time at which the file is moved
|
||
to the publicly available area. I am not sure whether it is
|
||
passed along the chain until that date, or if it is simply not to
|
||
be made "publicly available" until that date.
|
||
|
||
2.5.19 Replaces [FileName]
|
||
|
||
Only a filespec, no path information, is contained on this flavor
|
||
line.
|
||
|
||
A REPLACES line is used to optionally (at each given node) dispose
|
||
of older versions of the file being sent out. For instance,
|
||
Binkley releases are named:
|
||
|
||
BEXE_XXX.Arc
|
||
|
||
Assuming the next version of Binkley was 2.10, and assuming
|
||
REPLACES was enabled for the given area, the file named on the
|
||
REPLACES line would either be erased or moved if found.
|
||
|
||
I.E.:
|
||
|
||
FILE BEXE_210.Zoo
|
||
REPLACES BEXE_*.Arc
|
||
|
||
If these lines are encountered, and replacement is allowed, and
|
||
BEXE_200.Arc was found, it would, in some way, be removed from the
|
||
access directory.
|
||
|
||
Wildcards should be allowed, but should also be used with care.
|
||
|
||
Multiple REPLACES lines should be allowed.
|
||
|
||
2.5.20 Route [Address]
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 20 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
This is just thinking out loud.
|
||
|
||
These would have to be order dependent. They would be set up at
|
||
the point of creation, and there would have to be agreements all
|
||
along the way.
|
||
|
||
A political nightmare, but very useful in a corporate environment.
|
||
|
||
Collisions are a very real problem here.
|
||
|
||
2.5.21 RtRcpt {Address}
|
||
|
||
This is an item for discussion more than anything else. It would
|
||
be nice to have a means to find out how far your files have
|
||
moved. On the other hand, there are significant Policy type
|
||
considerations for such a functionality.
|
||
|
||
If the optional address is omitted, the ORIGIN is used.
|
||
|
||
2.5.22 Seenby [Address] {Arrival}
|
||
|
||
The current seenby specification allows for only one seenby per
|
||
line.
|
||
|
||
Seenby's are NOT order dependent. Seenby information is more
|
||
useful in "alphabetical" than encountered order, although it is
|
||
not a requirement.
|
||
|
||
2.5.23 Size [File Size in Bytes]
|
||
|
||
2.5.24 Source [Address]
|
||
|
||
Where the file actually came from.
|
||
|
||
This is a point for discussion. Let's consider the SDS again.
|
||
|
||
In theory, SDS is a controlled system. Files are only supposed to
|
||
enter it from a very limited subset of FidoNet. Currently, the
|
||
Origin is the location the file was "launched" from, a very
|
||
different thing than the author's address.
|
||
|
||
The Source address, if present, is the address of a primary system
|
||
used by the actual author.
|
||
|
||
For instance, consider Binkley. Binkley is supposed to enter the
|
||
system at the region 16 SDS node, although it is written by nodes
|
||
that do not participate in SDS.
|
||
|
||
2.5.25 Topo {Address}
|
||
|
||
This feature, if enabled, can be used to generate a topology
|
||
report for the area specified to the given node. If no node is
|
||
specified, the report should be sent to the Origin node.
|
||
|
||
2.5.26 Unidentified Verb Handling
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 21 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Lines with unrecognized verbs should be passed through. Order is
|
||
a critical issue here. Unknown lines should be output in the same
|
||
order they were input.
|
||
|
||
2.6 Feature Table
|
||
|
||
Feature Status Count
|
||
|
||
Area [Name] 1
|
||
File [FileName] 1
|
||
Path [Address] >=1
|
||
Created [Text] 0-1
|
||
From [Address]
|
||
Origin [Address]
|
||
SeenBy [Address]
|
||
Path [Address]
|
||
|
||
Unidentified Verbs
|
||
|
||
2.7 TK123456.Tic (Updated and amended slightly from Barry's Orig)
|
||
|
||
Area TICKTEST
|
||
File TEST.TXT
|
||
Desc This is the file description Line!
|
||
Origin 1:266/1
|
||
From 1:266/13
|
||
Created by TICK v1.00 - Copyright (C) 1988 by I. Barry Geller
|
||
Release 59000000
|
||
Path 1:266/21
|
||
Path 1:266/13
|
||
Path 1:150/1
|
||
Seenby 1:266/21
|
||
Seenby 1:266/13
|
||
Seenby 1:150/1
|
||
Pw TESTPW
|
||
|
||
2.8 Notes
|
||
|
||
2.8.1 The primary file should be sent before the associated file
|
||
|
||
The actual file should be sent before the associated information
|
||
file. Consider this was not done in the following scenario:
|
||
|
||
Associated file sent
|
||
Primary file partially sent - session fails
|
||
System processes associated files, and fails to find last primary
|
||
During next session, primary is sent, with no associated
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
FSC-0030
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 22 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
MESSAGE IDENTIFICATION AND REPLY FOR FIDONET
|
||
*DRAFT* FIDONET TECHNICAL COMMENT
|
||
|
||
Author: John Cowan
|
||
Fido: 1:107/711 (formerly 1:107/111)
|
||
Arpa: cowan@magpie.masa.com
|
||
Uucp: {backbones}!rutgers!hombre!magpie!cowan
|
||
Vox: +1-212-236-9153
|
||
|
||
ABSTRACT
|
||
|
||
The following document proposes a standard for message identification
|
||
and message reply identification for Fidonet and Fidonet-based
|
||
electronic mail system. It is based on the Usenet standard, RFC 850
|
||
and successors. The proposed standard will assist in duplicate-
|
||
message detection and will permit the support of true reply threading
|
||
across the network. The standard consists of mandatory and suggested
|
||
portions; however the term "mandatory" does not mean that any Fidonet
|
||
product must implement this standard --it simply means that those that
|
||
do claim to implement this standard must do so in the way described.
|
||
|
||
BACKGROUND
|
||
|
||
Currently, Fidonet messages are not uniquely identified. A variety of
|
||
schemes are in place to determine whether a message received by a
|
||
Fidonet node has been previously processed by the node, but all of
|
||
them involve a probabilistic component which may allow duplicates to
|
||
slip through. This can happen with particular ease where non-Fidonet
|
||
gateways are involved which may reformat a message.
|
||
|
||
In addition, Fidonet provides no clear and definite indication of
|
||
whether a message is a reply to some other message, and if so, which
|
||
message. This is a consequence of the previous problem -- there is no
|
||
way to refer to a message that is valid across all nodes. Programs
|
||
like TBBS, therefore, which do support the notion of detailed reply
|
||
threading (each reply refers to some definite "parent" message) have
|
||
to use a semi-guesswork algorithm which frequently leads to the wrong
|
||
answer -- the latest message with a common Subject header is taken to
|
||
be the parent, even when examination of the context by a human being
|
||
indicates that the message is in reply to some earlier message.
|
||
|
||
The Usenet network, which shares much of its problem domain with
|
||
Fidonet, solves these problems by tagging every outgoing message with
|
||
a unique Message ID string. Other messages can then refer to this
|
||
Message ID and provide an unambiguous indication of which message, or
|
||
messages, they are in reply to.
|
||
|
||
IFNA KLUDGE LINES "MESSAGE-ID" AND "IN-REPLY-TO"
|
||
|
||
Fidonet supports a general method for sending additional information
|
||
embedded in a message known as the "IFNA kludge line". This is a line
|
||
of text beginning with the ASCII SOH character. The characters
|
||
following SOH are a word indicating the type of kludge line, and the
|
||
remainder of the line contains information specific to that type.
|
||
|
||
This standard introduces two new types of kludge lines, the MESSAGE-ID
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 23 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
line and the IN-REPLY-TO line. These names, and the kludge line
|
||
formats, are taken directly from Usenet. MESSAGE-ID is used to tag an
|
||
outgoing message with a unique string, different from any other
|
||
message on the network. IN-REPLY-TO is used by threading message
|
||
processors to specify the Message ID of the "parent" of a reply
|
||
message. These kludge lines are generated and interpreted by message
|
||
editors; tosser/scanner and mailer products need only leave them
|
||
undisturbed. They are applicable to both regular network mail
|
||
and Echomail.
|
||
|
||
FORMAT OF A MESSAGE ID -- MANDATORY
|
||
|
||
This format is drawn directly from Usenet; it may seem a little
|
||
arcane, but is flexible enough to handle a large variety of needs.
|
||
Generally, a Message ID looks like this:
|
||
<unique-part@domain-name>
|
||
The <, @, and > characters are fixed, and are used to help in parsing
|
||
the Message ID. The "unique-part" may consist of any characters --
|
||
the only requirement is that it be different for every message
|
||
generated on a given node or point. Possible implementations of
|
||
"unique-part"s include a simple serial number, a date+time, or
|
||
something completely different.
|
||
|
||
The "domain-name" must be a valid Internet domain name. Luckily,
|
||
every Fidonet system has a valid domain name now! The format here is
|
||
as follows:
|
||
The domain name of the node a:bbb/ccc is
|
||
Fccc.Nbbb.Za.FIDONET.ORG
|
||
and the domain name of the point a:bbb/ccc.ddd is
|
||
Pddd.Fccc.Nbbb.Za.FIDONET.ORG
|
||
The periods, magic letters, and the magic name "FIDONET.ORG" make the
|
||
domain name unique in the world. Of course, Fidonet systems that
|
||
already have a different domain name (e.g. circle.UUCP) are free to
|
||
use that name instead.
|
||
|
||
A system which generates Message IDs must guarantee that no Message ID
|
||
will be reused for at least two years. This implies that if multiple
|
||
message editors exist on a system they must cooperate at least to the
|
||
extent of not using the same Message IDs for different messages. In
|
||
particular, a message editor that uses a simple serial number should
|
||
make provision for the user to set the starting serial number to a
|
||
value other than zero, so that different starting values can be used
|
||
by different products. Note that the numeric name of a .MSG file is
|
||
>not< suitable as a unique-part, because it is neither unique nor
|
||
permanent.
|
||
|
||
FORMAT OF A MESSAGE ID -- SUGGESTED
|
||
|
||
It is suggested, though not required, that the unique-part of all
|
||
Message IDs consist only of decimal digits, and not more than 9 of
|
||
these, so that the unique-part can be stored as a 32-bit signed
|
||
integer. A serial number scheme meets this standard, as does a Unix-
|
||
style timestamp (seconds since midnight Jan 1 1970, Universal Time).
|
||
There many other possible schemes.
|
||
|
||
CREATION OF THE IN-REPLY-TO LINE -- MANDATORY
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 24 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
The most important thing about the IN-REPLY-TO line is that the
|
||
Message ID specified by it should be the actual Message ID of the
|
||
message being replied to, and not a Message ID invented by the sender
|
||
of the reply. This implies that message editors which generate IN-
|
||
REPLY-TO lines should be able to store the Message IDs of all incoming
|
||
and locally generated messages for as long as the messages themselves
|
||
remain on-line. It is worth repeating, however, that there is nothing
|
||
mandatory about generating the IN-REPLY-TO line at all. A message
|
||
editor may generate both MESSAGE-ID and IN-REPLY-TO lines, only
|
||
MESSAGE-ID lines, or neither.
|
||
|
||
Due to problems with existing software, message editors should be
|
||
prepared to receive (and either discard or display uninterpreted) IN-
|
||
REPLY-TO lines which are >not< in standard format. Standard format
|
||
lines will have a < character just after the keyword and a > character
|
||
at the end of the line.
|
||
|
||
DUPLICATE MESSAGE ELIMINATION
|
||
|
||
Usenet makes use of a "history file" which maintains the Message IDs
|
||
of messages received in the last 15 days (this number is configurable
|
||
by the sysop). Fidonet has a similar scheme, but this is inherently
|
||
less reliable, depending as it does on the exact layout of each
|
||
message. With MESSAGE-ID kludge lines, dupe eliminators can take
|
||
advantage of them to help kill dupes once and for all, using existing
|
||
mechanisms as a backup when needed.
|
||
|
||
IMPLICATIONS FOR USENET GATEWAYS
|
||
|
||
Currently, Fidonet<->Usenet gateways generate Message IDs for messages
|
||
passing from Fidonet to Usenet, and discard them for messages passing
|
||
the other way. With this standard in place, such gateways should be
|
||
modified to watch for MESSAGE-ID and IN-REPLY-TO kludge lines and
|
||
translate them to Usenet "Message-ID:" and "In-Reply-To:" header
|
||
lines, and vice versa. This will improve the behavior of threading
|
||
systems like TBBS on the Fidonet side and 'notes' on the Usenet side.
|
||
Fidonet messages which don't have a MESSAGE-ID line will, of course,
|
||
need to have one generated when passing over to Usenet, as is now the
|
||
case.
|
||
|
||
IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||
|
||
The Magpie tree-structured BBS is now being enhanced to provide
|
||
Fidonet access to its users. Magpie depends heavily on the notion of
|
||
parent messages; every message on a Magpie system (except one) has a
|
||
parent. Magpie/Fidonet systems will use the above technique to pass
|
||
the parent information they need transparently through the Fidonet, so
|
||
that incoming Fidonet messages can be connected at the correct place
|
||
in the Magpie tree. (A backup algorithm similar to TBBS's will be
|
||
used for Fidonet messages without parent information.)
|
||
|
||
We are publishing this information as a Fidonet technical comment in
|
||
hopes that other Fidonet products will eventually incorporate all or
|
||
part of this standard as well, and that it will eventually form part
|
||
of a Fidonet Technical Standard.
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 25 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
FSC-0031 May 1, 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
EchoMail ^aEID: Dup-Checking with Linked Replies
|
||
A Proposal To The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee
|
||
|
||
Currently, no universal methodology for implementing echomail
|
||
duplicate message checking exists. One thing is certain - they
|
||
will only increase in number as the shear volume of echomail is
|
||
increasing every day!
|
||
|
||
In order to catch the highest percentage of duplicates possible
|
||
it is desirable to utilize a system which actually tags each of
|
||
the messages themselves with a distinct messages identifier to
|
||
be used to check against an existing database of all previous
|
||
messages' identifiers. In practice, this is not possible, but
|
||
we can limit the number of previous identifiers kept so that
|
||
processing is quick but still almost certain to eliminate any
|
||
duplicate messages.
|
||
|
||
This also provides an easy method of linking replies to their
|
||
original message by appending the previous identifier. Using
|
||
a linked reply technique allows easy relinking of the messages
|
||
to the original message, assuming it still exists.
|
||
|
||
This proposed ^aEID: kludge line specifications are as follows:
|
||
|
||
1) A 16-bit CRC followed by a 32-bit DOS file date/time stamp.
|
||
|
||
2) The 16-bit CRC is calculated by first CRC'ing all but the
|
||
first 11 (static) characters of the origin line, followed
|
||
by the first two "words" of the from name, the first two
|
||
words of the to name, and the first 25 characters of the
|
||
subject line after stripping leading occurances of "Re: "
|
||
sequences.
|
||
|
||
Notes: You must always upper-case the to/from/subject fields,
|
||
as some current processors will change the case of that text.
|
||
Using only the first two words of the from and to names will
|
||
eliminate the potential problem when some processors add the
|
||
" of xxx/yyy" to the end. Stripping all leading occurances
|
||
of the "Re: " in the subject field is also done to eliminate
|
||
the possibility of changed subject lines not matching with
|
||
the original message, which is also the reason for limiting
|
||
the length of that field to the first 25 bytes (after taking
|
||
off all the "Re: " sequences), because adding the leading
|
||
"Re: " may force characters out (because they are beyond the
|
||
72-character field limit).
|
||
|
||
When you must add an EID line for a message which is not local,
|
||
you have to zero the seconds field before creating the 32-bit
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 26 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
time stamp - some processors eliminate this information! This
|
||
limitation can be overcome if most editors insert them at the
|
||
time they are written.
|
||
|
||
Automatic reply linking
|
||
========= ===== =======
|
||
|
||
When replying to a message with an ^aEID: line, extend the new
|
||
^aEID: with the ^aEID: fields of the original message. The new
|
||
line would look like this:
|
||
|
||
^aEID: xxxx yyyyzzzz uuuu vvvvwwww
|
||
|
||
Where 'uuuu vvvvwwww' is the Eid information of the original
|
||
message. Only one previous message's information is retained.
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
FSC-0032 May 1, 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Uniform EchoMail Quoting Style
|
||
A Proposal To The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee
|
||
|
||
As more and more new software appears on the network, it has
|
||
become evident that we need a universal method for quoting text
|
||
of previous messages in replies.
|
||
|
||
Because of the way quoted text must appear, it is necessary to
|
||
format said text with "Hard" <CR> characters, in order to keep
|
||
the block from drifting should the new text itself be quoted.
|
||
|
||
The following method should allow current and future programs
|
||
to properly identify and handle previously quoted material.
|
||
|
||
Newly quoted text should be preceeded by the a single space,
|
||
a greater than symbol ('>') and another space.
|
||
|
||
Optionally a field of initials may appear in front of the
|
||
greater than symbol, like this: " MR> ". If you allow the
|
||
initials to be inserted, they should only be inserted into
|
||
lines which have not been previously quoted. (in other words,
|
||
don't add initials to anything already quoted)
|
||
|
||
Successive quotes of previously quoted material should only add
|
||
a single ">" in front of the existing text, which may eliminate
|
||
the leading blank space.
|
||
|
||
Blank lines in quotes should remain blank (no '>' or initials).
|
||
|
||
Kludge lines, including tear lines and origins lines are not
|
||
normally quoted, but when they are - they must never be quoted
|
||
exactly - this definitely causes problems with other software!
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 27 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
FSC-0033
|
||
June 11, 1989
|
||
FidoNet Message ID Proposal
|
||
By Todd Kover
|
||
1:261/5016;1:261/1028
|
||
|
||
Since there are many proposals for Message-IDs, for dupe-checking,
|
||
and reply-linking, I figured, I may as well do my best to add
|
||
confusion to things, and come up with another one. :-) In my playing
|
||
around with different ideas, and such, I came out with the following
|
||
format:
|
||
|
||
^AFMSGID:DDDYYHHMMSSLLNNNNOOOOPPPP[ZZZZ][Domain]
|
||
|
||
^AFREPLY: < Repeat of what is above >
|
||
|
||
Here's a brief explanation of what each area is...
|
||
|
||
DDD: (01-366) The day of the year. (Julian calendar method).
|
||
|
||
YY: (0x00-0xFF) The year. Now, this only gives 255 year accuracy,
|
||
but, if the message has been in circulation that long, then it
|
||
deserves to be read again. :-)
|
||
|
||
HH: (00-23) Hour which the message was written
|
||
|
||
MM: (00-59) Minute which the message was written
|
||
|
||
SS: (00-59) Seconds which the message was written
|
||
|
||
LL: (0x01-0xFF) In reading NET_DEV, and FTSC, and all of the
|
||
debating over "What happens when someone enters a message at
|
||
the EXACT same time, on my multiline system?) Well, the best
|
||
way to avoid that, is to either A) Set the ID while packing
|
||
the message up, and only pack all the lines messages in, at
|
||
once, or, use this option, that sets the line number, of the
|
||
caller (0-0xFF).. I figure that there won't be more than 255
|
||
lines to a single node... I would opt for the former, but, I
|
||
put this in here, to shut everyone up. :-)
|
||
|
||
NNNN: (0x00-0xFFFF) The Net Number of the node, that this message
|
||
originates from.
|
||
|
||
OOOO: (0x00-0xFFFF) The Node Number of the node, that this message
|
||
originates from.
|
||
|
||
PPPP: (0x00-0xFFFF) The Point Number of the node, that this message
|
||
originates from.
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 28 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
------
|
||
Now for the Optional ones:
|
||
|
||
ZZZZ: Since there is a question as to weather or not Zones should be
|
||
implemented, and, some packages do not implement them, I
|
||
figured that this should be optional. If it is not there,
|
||
then a Domain address would be there, or, nothing at all.
|
||
|
||
Domain: This is for the people that use these (SEADogians, for one).
|
||
I am assuming that Domains are alphabetic characters, and no
|
||
numbers are there (Which is probobly stupid on my part), so
|
||
that software can distingish between Domains, and Zones.
|
||
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
The FREPLY: is just teh FMSGID of the message that the message is
|
||
replying too. That way, you can just compare.
|
||
|
||
|
||
In order to allow dupe checking, a system has to keep a backlog of all
|
||
of the message IDs for some period of time (say 2 weeks?) that pass
|
||
through the system, and has to compare a new one to the old ones. If
|
||
it matches, then the message is a dupe. This doesn't seem too
|
||
efficient, since there are alot of messages that pass through
|
||
something such as a backbone, but, I am sure there is some way to make
|
||
it fast, I just haven't put enough thought into it, yet).
|
||
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
One of the more nicer features about this, is that if the ID is not
|
||
there, then it can be calculated by examinining parts of the message,
|
||
and the header to get all of the information, and, it can be put in
|
||
there. Pretty simple, eh?
|
||
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
If you want to get in contact with me, to make contacts on this, you
|
||
can reach me at my private node, 1:261/5016, but, since I only poll
|
||
the Net-Coordinator once a week, or so, to pick up my NodeDiff, and
|
||
FidoNews, I will be a little slow in responding to it. You can reach
|
||
me pretty quickly on 1:261/1028, which is the only BBS that I
|
||
frequent, just about daily, and, if I don't, the sysop there will tell
|
||
me if there is anything waiting for me... Direct flames, and such
|
||
things to NIL:, thank you..
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 29 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
COORDINATORS CORNER
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
Nodelist-statistics as seen from Zone-2 for day 031
|
||
By Ward Dossche, 2:292/854
|
||
ZC/2
|
||
|
||
+----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
|
||
|Zone|Nl-003|Nodelist-010|Nodelist-017|Nodelist-024|Nodelist-031|%%|
|
||
+----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
|
||
| 1 | 10370|10370 0 |10177 -193 |10063 -114 | 9877 -186 |35|
|
||
| 2 | 16056|15979 -77 |15936 -43 |15938 2 |16078 140 |56|
|
||
| 3 | 869| 868 -1 | 865 -3 | 863 -2 | 863 0 | 3|
|
||
| 4 | 552| 554 2 | 553 -1 | 558 5 | 550 -8 | 2|
|
||
| 5 | 93| 93 0 | 93 0 | 93 0 | 87 -6 | 0|
|
||
| 6 | 1073| 1073 0 | 1073 0 | 1072 -1 | 1072 0 | 4|
|
||
+----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
|
||
| 29013|28937 -76 |28697 -240 |28587 -110 |28527 -60 |
|
||
+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 30 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
NET HUMOR
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
An irreverent look at FidoLand hierarchy. :)
|
||
Paul Quinn at 3:640/384
|
||
|
||
Aha! Here it is... knew I had it somewhere. I found this description
|
||
of the network lying around and, as I'd had such a good belly-laugh,
|
||
thought that I ought to really pass it around.
|
||
|
||
FidoNet Co-ordinators
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
*IC
|
||
|
||
leaps tall buildings in a single bound
|
||
is more powerful than a locomotive
|
||
is faster than a speeding bullet
|
||
walks on water
|
||
is GOD
|
||
|
||
*ZC
|
||
|
||
leaps short buildings in a single bound
|
||
is more powerful than a shunting engine
|
||
is faster than a speeding bullet
|
||
walks on water if the sea is calm
|
||
gives policy to God
|
||
|
||
*RC
|
||
|
||
leaps short buildings with a running start and favourable winds
|
||
is almost as powerful as a shunting engine
|
||
is just as fast as a speeding bullet
|
||
walks on water in an indoor swimming pool
|
||
talks with God
|
||
|
||
*NC
|
||
|
||
barely clears a fabricated hut
|
||
loses a tug of war with locomotive
|
||
can fire a speeding bullet
|
||
swims well
|
||
talks with God if special request is approved
|
||
|
||
*HUB
|
||
|
||
makes high marks on the wall when trying to clear tall buildings
|
||
is run over by locomotives
|
||
can sometimes handle a gun without hurting themselves
|
||
dog paddles
|
||
talks to animals
|
||
|
||
*NODE
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 31 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
runs into buildings
|
||
recognises locomotives 2 times out of 3
|
||
is not issued with ammunition
|
||
can stay afloat with a lifejacket
|
||
talks to walls
|
||
|
||
*POINT
|
||
|
||
falls over doorstep when trying to enter buildings
|
||
says look at the choo choo
|
||
wets themselves with water pistol
|
||
plays in mudpuddles
|
||
mumbles to themselves
|
||
|
||
*USER
|
||
|
||
lifts buildings and walks under them
|
||
kicks locomotives off the tracks
|
||
catches speeding bullets in teeth and ears
|
||
walks on water if it is frozen
|
||
who the hell is GOD?
|
||
|
||
Many thanks to Stuart Fox (3:635/727.21) for the original.
|
||
|
||
Cheers,
|
||
Paul.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
From: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@monarch.papillion.ne.us>
|
||
To: "Baker, Christopher" <cbaker84@digital.net (Christopher Baker)>,
|
||
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 97 14:22:29 -0600
|
||
Reply-To: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@monarch.papillion.ne.us>
|
||
Subject: Fwd: PC Users
|
||
|
||
==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==================
|
||
>Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:11:26 -0600
|
||
>To: Mike Riddle <mriddle@monarch.papillion.ne.us>
|
||
>From: "Demitri Baroutsos" <deems@bigfoot.com> (by way of jennifer
|
||
rose <jjrose@redoak.heartland.net>)
|
||
>Subject: PC Users
|
||
>Mime-Version: 1.0
|
||
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
|
||
|
||
|
||
9 Different types of users
|
||
|
||
El Explicito:
|
||
|
||
"I tried the thing, ya know, and it worked, ya know, but now it
|
||
doesn't, ya know?"
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Provides interesting communication challenges.
|
||
Disadvantages: So do chimps.
|
||
Symptoms : Complete inability to use proper nouns
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 32 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Real Case : One user walked up to a certain Armenian pod manager
|
||
and said, "I can't get what I want!" The pod manager
|
||
leaned back, put his hands on his belt-buckle, and
|
||
said, "Well, ma'am, you've come to the right place."
|
||
|
||
Mad Bomber:
|
||
|
||
"Well, I hit Alt-f6, shift-f8, Cntrl-f10, f4, and f9, and now it
|
||
looks all weird."
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Will try to find own solution to problems.
|
||
Disadvantages: User might have translated document to Navajo without
|
||
meaning to.
|
||
Symptoms : More than six stopped jobs in UNIX, a 2:1 code-to-
|
||
letter ratio in WordPerfect
|
||
Real Case : One user came in complaining that his WordPerfect
|
||
document was underlined. When I used reveal codes on
|
||
it, I found that he'd set and unset underline more
|
||
than fifty times in his document.
|
||
|
||
Frying Pan/Fire Tactician:
|
||
|
||
"It didn't work with the data set we had, so I fed in my aunt's
|
||
Recipe for key lime pie."
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Will usually fix error.
|
||
Disadvantages: 'Fix' is defined VERY loosely here.
|
||
Symptoms : A tendency to delete lines that get errors instead of
|
||
fixing them.
|
||
Real Case : One user complained that their program executed, but
|
||
didn't do anything. The scon looked at it for twenty
|
||
minutes before realizing that they'd commented out
|
||
EVERY LINE. The user said, "Well, that was the only
|
||
way I could get it to compile."
|
||
|
||
Shaman:
|
||
|
||
"Last week, when the moon was full, the clouds were thick, and
|
||
formahaut was above the horizon, I typed f77, and lo, it did
|
||
compile."
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Gives insight into primitive mythology.
|
||
Disadvantages: Few scons are anthropology majors.
|
||
Symptoms : Frequent questions about irrelevant objects.
|
||
Real Case : One user complained that all information on one of
|
||
their disks got erased (as Norton Utilities showed
|
||
nothing but empty sectors, I suspect nothing had ever
|
||
been on it). Reasoning that the deleted information
|
||
went *somewhere*, they wouldn't shut up until the
|
||
scon checked four different disks for the missing
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
X-user:
|
||
|
||
"Will you look at those...um, that resolution, quite impressive,
|
||
really."
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 33 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Using the cutting-edge in graphics technology.
|
||
Disadvantages: Has little or no idea how to use the cutting-edge in
|
||
graphics technology.
|
||
Symptoms : Fuzzy hands, blindness
|
||
Real Case : When I was off duty, two users sat down in front of
|
||
me at DEC station 5000/200s that systems was
|
||
reconfiguring. I suppressed my laughter while, for
|
||
twenty minutes, they sat down and did their best to
|
||
act like they were doing exactly what they wanted to
|
||
do, even though they couldn't log in.
|
||
|
||
Miracle Worker:
|
||
|
||
"But it read a file from it yesterday!" 'Sir, at a guess, this disk
|
||
has been swallowed and regurgitated.' "But I did that a month ago,
|
||
and it read a file from it yesterday!"
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Apparently has remarkable luck when you aren't
|
||
around.
|
||
Disadvantages: People complain when scons actually use the word
|
||
"horse-puckey".
|
||
Symptoms : Loses all ability to do impossible when you're
|
||
around. Must be the kryptonite in your pocket.
|
||
Real Case : At least three users have claimed that they've loaded
|
||
IBM WordPerfect from Macintosh disks.
|
||
|
||
Taskmaster:
|
||
|
||
"Well, this is a file in MacWrite. Do you know how I can upload it
|
||
to MUSIC, transfer it over to UNIX from there, download it onto an
|
||
IBM, convert it to WordPerfect, and put it in three-column format?"
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Bold new challenges.
|
||
Disadvantages: Makes one wish to be a garbage collector.
|
||
Symptoms : An inability to keep quiet. Strong tendencies to
|
||
make machines do things they don't want to do.
|
||
Real Case : One user tried to get a scon to find out what another
|
||
person's E-mail address was even though the user
|
||
didn't know his target's home system, account name,
|
||
or real name.
|
||
|
||
Maestro:
|
||
|
||
"Well, first I sat down, like this. Then I logged on, like this, and
|
||
after that, I typed in my password, like this, and after that I
|
||
edited my file, like this, and after that I went to this line here,
|
||
like this, and after that I picked my nose, like this..."
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Willing to show you exactly what they did to get an
|
||
error.
|
||
Disadvantages: For as long as five or six hours.
|
||
Symptoms : Selective deafness to the phrases, "Right, right,
|
||
okay, but what was the ERROR?", and a strong fondness
|
||
for the phrase, "Well, I'm getting to that."
|
||
Real Case : I once had to spend half an hour looking over a
|
||
user's shoulder while they continuously retrieved a
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 34 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
document into itself and denied that they did it (the
|
||
user was complaining that their document was 87
|
||
copies of the same thing).
|
||
|
||
Princess (unfair, perhaps, as these tend, overwhelmingly, to be
|
||
males):
|
||
|
||
"I need a Mac, and someone's got the one I like reserved, would you
|
||
please garrote him and put him in the paper recycling bin?"
|
||
|
||
Advantages : Flatters you with their high standards for your
|
||
service.
|
||
Disadvantages: Impresses you with their obliviousness to other
|
||
people on this planet.
|
||
Symptoms : Inability to communicate except by complaining.
|
||
Real Case : One asked a scon to remove the message of the day
|
||
because he (the user) didn't like it.
|
||
|
||
Yours Humouresly,
|
||
The Humour Man (aka Demitri Baroutsos)
|
||
|
||
mailto:humour@bigfoot.com
|
||
http://www.nis.za/homepgs/dbarout.htm
|
||
http://cyber.nis.za/penpal/
|
||
|
||
Online Pager: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/189775
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------------------
|
||
** DISCLAIMER ** None of the jokes posted are in any way
|
||
intended to insult or offend any person/place/race/creed or
|
||
sex. The jokes posted in no way represent my views or those
|
||
of the company I work for. The jokes posted may contain rude
|
||
or inappropriate words and/or content - parental guidance
|
||
is advised.
|
||
|
||
===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 35 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
COMIX IN ASCII
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
--- Following message extracted from NETMAIL @ 1:18/14 ---
|
||
By Christopher Baker on Mon Jan 27 06:12:42 1997
|
||
|
||
From: Dave Aronson @ 1:109/120
|
||
To: Chris Baker @ 1:18/14
|
||
Date: 26 Jan 97 21:38:52
|
||
Subj: more ascii comix
|
||
|
||
I was going to send you more of my ASCII art, but I didn't want to
|
||
|
||
/\__--~~~--__/\
|
||
||\ /||
|
||
|/|(O) (O)|\|
|
||
\ .---. /
|
||
\ ( O O ) /
|
||
\ `---' /
|
||
`-----'
|
||
|
||
the space all to myself.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 36 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
NOTICES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
Future History
|
||
|
||
6 Feb 1997
|
||
Waitangi Day, New Zealand.
|
||
|
||
7 Feb 1997
|
||
Chinese New Year, Year of the Ox - 4695.
|
||
|
||
16 Feb 1997
|
||
Eleventh Anniversary of invention of Echomail by Jeff Rush.
|
||
|
||
29 Feb 1997
|
||
Nothing will happen on this day.
|
||
|
||
17 May 1997
|
||
Independence Day, Norway.
|
||
|
||
25 May 1997
|
||
Independence Day, Argentina.
|
||
|
||
6 Jun 1997
|
||
National Commemoration Day, Sweden.
|
||
|
||
11 Jun 1997
|
||
Independence Day, Russia.
|
||
|
||
1 Jul 1997
|
||
Canada Day - Happy Birthday Canada.
|
||
|
||
13 Oct 1997
|
||
Thanksgiving Day, Canada.
|
||
|
||
1 Dec 1997
|
||
World AIDS Day.
|
||
|
||
10 Dec 1997
|
||
Nobel Day, Sweden.
|
||
|
||
12 Jan 1998
|
||
HAL 9000 is one year old today.
|
||
|
||
22 May 1998
|
||
Expo '98 World Exposition in Lisbon (Portugal) opens.
|
||
|
||
1 Dec 1998
|
||
Fifteenth Anniversary of release of Fido version 1 by
|
||
Tom Jennings.
|
||
|
||
31 Dec 1999
|
||
Hogmanay, Scotland. The New Year that can't be missed.
|
||
|
||
1 Jan 2000
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 37 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
The 20th Century, C.E., is still taking place thru 31 Dec.
|
||
|
||
15 Sep 2000
|
||
Sydney (Australia) Summer Olympiad opens.
|
||
|
||
1 Jan 2001
|
||
This is the actual start of the new millennium, C.E.
|
||
|
||
-- If YOU have something which you would like to see in this
|
||
Future History, please send a note to the FidoNews Editor.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 38 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
FIDONET SOFTWARE LISTING
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
Latest Greatest Software Versions
|
||
by Peter E. Popovich, 1:363/264
|
||
|
||
My apologies to everyone; I missed last week's deadline. Sigh. And I
|
||
was doing so well... ;-)
|
||
|
||
I thought I'd have phased out the old info by now, but old info still
|
||
makes up 47% of the column. I kept a few of the old sections around,
|
||
hoping it would encourage folks to write in. It's also been harder to
|
||
find contact info than I expected.
|
||
|
||
Anyone who has contact info for -any- package of interest to Fidonet
|
||
sysops is encouraged to submit it. I'm happy to do the leg-work of
|
||
tracking down the specifics if I have a name to start with.
|
||
|
||
Fair warning: The Xenix, Atari, and CoCo sections got a reprieve
|
||
because folks wrote in. Since then, I've gotten a few Unix and Atari
|
||
submissions, but no CoCo submissions. I plan to phase out the old
|
||
Xenix and CoCo sections soon unless I hear something new. The Atari
|
||
section will follow once I've followed up on my leads.
|
||
|
||
Phased out this week: TBBS 2.1, TComm/TCommNet 3.4,
|
||
Telegard 2.7, and TPBoard 6.1
|
||
|
||
Phase-out highlights:
|
||
This week: "Xenix/Unix 386 -- Other Utilities" Section
|
||
Deadline for info: 14 Feb 1997.
|
||
Last week: WildCat! 3.02 and XBBS 1.77
|
||
Deadline for info: 7 Feb 1997.
|
||
|
||
-=- Snip -=-
|
||
|
||
Submission form for the Latest Greatest Software Versions column
|
||
|
||
OS Platform :
|
||
Software package name :
|
||
Version :
|
||
Function(s) - BBS, Mailer, Tosser, etc. :
|
||
Freeware / Shareware / Commercial? :
|
||
Author / Support staff contact name :
|
||
Author / Support staff contact node :
|
||
Magic name (at the above-listed node) :
|
||
|
||
Please include a sentence describing what the package does.
|
||
|
||
Please send updates and suggestions to: Peter Popovich, 1:363/264
|
||
|
||
-=- Snip -=-
|
||
|
||
MS-DOS:
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 39 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Act-Up 4.6 G D Chris Gunn 1:15/55 ACT-UP
|
||
ALLFIX 4.40 T S Harald Harms 2:281/415 ALLFIX
|
||
Announcer 1.1 O S Peter Karlsson 2:206/221 ANNOUNCE
|
||
BGFAX 1.60 O S B.J. Guillot 1:106/400 BGFAX
|
||
Binkley Docs 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BDOC_260.ZIP
|
||
BinkleyTerm 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BDOS_260.ZIP
|
||
BinkleyTerm-XE XR4 M F Thomas Waldmann 2:2474/400 BTXE_DOS
|
||
CFRoute 0.92 O G C. Fernandez Sanz 2:341/70 CFR
|
||
CheckPnt 1.0 O G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 CHECKPNT
|
||
FastEcho 1.45a T S Tobias Burchhardt 2:2448/400 FASTECHO
|
||
FastEcho/16 1.45a T S Tobias Burchhardt 2:2448/400 FE16
|
||
FidoBBS (tm) 12u B S Ray Brown 1:1/117 FILES
|
||
FrontDoor 2.12 M S JoHo 2:201/330 FD
|
||
FrontDoor 2.20c M C JoHo 2:201/330 FDINFO
|
||
GIGO 07-14-96 G S Jason Fesler 1:1/141 INFO
|
||
GoldED 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GED
|
||
GoldED Docs 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEM
|
||
GoldNODE 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEN
|
||
Imail 1.75 T S Michael McCabe 1:1/121 IMAIL
|
||
ImCrypt 1.04 O G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 IMCRYPT
|
||
InfoMail 1.11 O F Damian Walker 2:2502/666 INFOMAIL
|
||
InfoMail/386 1.20 O F Damian Walker 2:2502/666 INFO386
|
||
InterEcho 1.19 T C Peter Stewart 1:369/35 IEDEMO
|
||
InterMail 2.29k M C Peter Stewart 1:369/35 IMDEMO
|
||
InterPCB 1.52 O S Peter Stewart 1:369/35 INTERPCB
|
||
IPNet 1.11 O S Michele Stewart 1:369/21 IPNET
|
||
JD's CBV 1.4 O S John Dailey 1:363/277 CBV
|
||
Jelly-Bean 1.01 T S Rowan Crowe 3:635/727 JELLY
|
||
Jelly-Bean/386 1.01 T S Rowan Crowe 3:635/727 JELLY386
|
||
JMail-Hudson 2.81 T S Jason Steck 1:285/424 JMAIL-H
|
||
JMail-Goldbase 2.81 T S Jason Steck 1:285/424 JMAIL-G
|
||
MakePl 1.9 N G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 MAKEPL
|
||
Marena 1.1 beta O G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 MARENA
|
||
Maximus 3.01 B P Tech 1:249/106 MAX
|
||
McMail 1.0 M S Michael McCabe 1:1/148 MCMAIL
|
||
MDNDP 1.18 N S Bill Doyle 1:388/7 MDNDP
|
||
Msged 4.00 O G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 MSGED
|
||
Opus CBCS 1.73a B P Christopher Baker 1:374/14 OPUS
|
||
O/T-Track 2.63a O S Peter Hampf 2:241/1090 OT
|
||
PcMerge 2.7 N G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 PCMERGE
|
||
PlatinumXpress 1.3 M C Gary Petersen 1:290/111 PX13TD.ZIP
|
||
RAR 2.00 C S Ron Dwight 2:220/22 RAR
|
||
RemoteAccess 2.50 B S Mark Lewis 1:3634/12 RA
|
||
Silver Xpress
|
||
Door 5.4 O S Gary Petersen 1:290/111 FILES
|
||
Reader 4.4 O S Gary Petersen 1:290/111 SXR44.ZIP
|
||
Spitfire 3.51 B S Mike Weaver 1:3670/3 SPITFIRE
|
||
Squish 1.11 T P Tech 1:249/106 SQUISH
|
||
StealTag UK 1.c... O F Fred Schenk 2:284/412 STEAL_UK
|
||
StealTag NL 1.c... O F Fred Schenk 2:284/412 STEAL_NL
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 40 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
T-Mail 2.599I M S Ron Dwight 2:220/22 TMAIL
|
||
Terminate 4.00 O S Bo Bendtsen 2:254/261 TERMINATE
|
||
Tobruk 0.33 T G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 TOBRUK
|
||
TriBBS 10.0 B S Patrick Driscoll 1:372/19 TRIBBS
|
||
TriDog 10.0 M S Patrick Driscoll 1:372/19 TRIDOG
|
||
TriToss 10.0 T S Patrick Driscoll 1:372/19 TRITOSS
|
||
WaterGate 0.92 G S Robert Szarka 1:320/42 WTRGATE
|
||
WWIV 4.24a B S Craig Dooley 1:376/126 WWIV
|
||
WWIVTOSS 1.30 T S Craig Dooley 1:376/126 WWIVTOSS
|
||
xMail 2.00 T S Thorsten Franke 2:2448/53 XMAIL
|
||
XRobot 3.01 O S JoHo 2:201/330 XRDOS
|
||
|
||
OS/2:
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
ALLFIX/2 1.10 T S Harald Harms 2:281/415 AFIXOS2
|
||
BGFAX 1.60 O S B.J. Guillot 1:106/400 BGFAX
|
||
Binkley Docs 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BDOC_260.ZIP
|
||
BinkleyTerm 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BOS2_260.ZIP
|
||
BinkleyTerm-XE XR4 M F Thomas Waldmann 2:2474/400 BTXE_OS2
|
||
CFRoute 0.92 O G C. Fernandez Sanz 2:341/70 CFR
|
||
FastEcho 1.45a T S Tobias Burchhardt 2:2448/400 FE2
|
||
FleetStreet 1.18 O S Michael Hohner 2:2490/2520 FLEET
|
||
GIGO 07-14-96 G S Jason Fesler 1:1/141 INFO
|
||
GoldED 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEO
|
||
GoldED Docs 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEM
|
||
GoldNODE 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEN
|
||
ImCrypt 1.04 O G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 IMCRYPT
|
||
Maximus 3.01 B P Tech 1:249/106 MAXP
|
||
Msged 4.00 O G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 MSGED
|
||
PcMerge 2.3 N G Michiel van der Vlist
|
||
2:500/9 PCMERGE
|
||
RAR 2.00 C S Ron Dwight 2:220/22 RAR2
|
||
Squish 1.11 T P Tech 1:249/106 SQUISHP
|
||
T-Mail 2.599I M S Ron Dwight 2:220/22 TMAIL2
|
||
Tobruk 0.33 T G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 TOBRUK
|
||
XRobot 3.01 O S JoHo 2:201/330 XROS2
|
||
|
||
Windows (16-bit apps):
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
BeeMail 1.0 M C Andrius Cepaitis 2:470/1 BEEMAIL
|
||
FrontDoor APX 1.10 P S Mats Wallin 2:201/329 FDAPXW
|
||
|
||
Windows (32-bit apps):
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
BeeMail 1.0 M C Andrius Cepaitis 2:470/1 BEEMAIL
|
||
Binkley Docs 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BDOC_260.ZIP
|
||
BinkleyTerm 2.60 M F Bob Juge 1:1/102 BW32_260.ZIP
|
||
CFRoute 0.92 O G C. Fernandez Sanz 2:341/70 CFR
|
||
GoldED 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEO
|
||
GoldED Docs 2.50 O S Len Morgan 1:203/730 GEM
|
||
Maximus 3.01 B P Tech 1:249/106 MAXN
|
||
Msged/NT 4.00 O G Andrew Clarke 3:635/728 MSGNT400.ZIP
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 41 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
PlatinumXpress 2.00 M C Gary Petersen 1:290/111 PXW-INFO
|
||
T-Mail 2.599I M S Ron Dwight 2:220/22 TMAILNT
|
||
WinFOSSIL/95 1.12 r4 F S Bryan Woodruff 1:343/294 WNFOSSIL.ZIP
|
||
WinFOSSIL/NT 1.0 beta F S Bryan Woodruff 1:343/294 NTFOSSIL.ZIP
|
||
|
||
Unix:
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
ifmail 2.8g M G Eugene Crosser 2:293/2219 IFMAIL
|
||
ifmail-tx ...tx7.8 M G Pablo Saratxaga 2:293/2219 IFMAILTX
|
||
Msged 4.00 O G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 MSGED
|
||
Tobruk 0.33 T G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 TOBRUK
|
||
|
||
Amiga:
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
CrashMail 1.23 T X Fredrik Bennison 2:205/324 CRASHMAIL
|
||
CrashTick 1.1 O F Fredrik Bennison 2:205/324 CRASHTICK
|
||
DLG Pro BBOS 1.15 B C Holly Sullivan 1:202/720 DLGDEMO
|
||
GMS 1.1.85 M S Mirko Viviani 2:331/213 GMS
|
||
Msged 4.00 O G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 MSGED
|
||
Tobruk 0.33 T G Paul Edwards 3:711/934 TOBRUK
|
||
|
||
Atari:
|
||
Program Name Version F C Contact Name Node Magic Name
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
BinkleyTerm/ST 3.18pl1 M F Bill Scull 1:363/112 BINKLEY
|
||
|
||
Function: B-BBS, P-Point, M-Mailer, N-Nodelist, G-Gateway, T-Tosser,
|
||
C-Compression, F-Fossil, O-Other. Note: Multifunction will
|
||
be listed by the first match.
|
||
|
||
Cost: P-Free for personal use, F-Freeware, S-Shareware, C-Commercial,
|
||
X-Crippleware, D-Demoware, G-Free w/ Source
|
||
|
||
Old info from: 01/27/92
|
||
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
BBS Software MS-DOS Systems
|
||
Name Version --------------
|
||
--------------------
|
||
WildCat! 3.02* Other Utilities Other Utilities
|
||
XBBS 1.77 Name Version Name Version
|
||
-------------------- --------------------
|
||
Network Mailers 2DAPoint 1.50* Netsex 2.00b
|
||
Name Version 4Dog/4DMatrix 1.18 OFFLINE 1.35
|
||
-------------------- ARCAsim 2.31 Oliver 1.0a
|
||
D'Bridge 1.30 ARCmail 3.00* OSIRIS CBIS 3.02
|
||
Dreamer 1.06 Areafix 1.20 PKInsert 7.10
|
||
Dutchie 2.90c ConfMail 4.00 PolyXarc 2.1a
|
||
Milqtoast 1.00 Crossnet 1.5 QM 1.00a
|
||
PreNM 1.48 DOMAIN 1.42 QSort 4.04
|
||
SEAdog 4.60 DEMM 1.06 RAD Plus 2.11
|
||
SEAmail 1.01 DGMM 1.06 Raid 1.00
|
||
TIMS 1.0(mod8) DOMAIN 1.42 RBBSMail 18.0
|
||
EEngine 0.32 ScanToss 1.28
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 42 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Compression EMM 2.11* ScMail 1.00
|
||
Utilities EZPoint 2.1 ScEdit 1.12
|
||
Name Version FGroup 1.00 Sirius 1.0x
|
||
-------------------- FidoPCB 1.0s@ SLMail 2.15C
|
||
ARC 7.12 FNPGate 2.70 StarLink 1.01
|
||
ARJ 2.20 GateWorks 3.06e TagMail 2.41
|
||
LHA 2.13 GMail 2.05 TCOMMail 2.2
|
||
PAK 2.51 GMD 3.10 Telemail 1.5*
|
||
PKPak 3.61 GMM 1.21 TGroup 1.13
|
||
PKZip 1.10 GROUP 2.23 TIRES 3.11
|
||
GUS 1.40 TMail 1.21
|
||
NodeList Utilities Harvey's Robot 4.10 TosScan 1.00
|
||
Name Version HeadEdit 1.18 UFGATE 1.03
|
||
-------------------- HLIST 1.09 VPurge 4.09e
|
||
EditNL 4.00 ISIS 5.12@ WEdit 2.0@
|
||
FDND 1.10 Lola 1.01d WildMail 2.00
|
||
MakeNL 2.31 Mosaic 1.00b WMail 2.2
|
||
Parselst 1.33 MailBase 4.11a@ WNode 2.1
|
||
Prune 1.40 MSG 4.5* XRS 4.99
|
||
SysNL 3.14 MsgLnk 1.0c XST 2.3e
|
||
XlatList 2.90 MsgMstr 2.03a YUPPIE! 2.00
|
||
XlaxNode/Diff 2.53 MsgNum 4.16d ZmailH 1.25
|
||
MSGTOSS 1.3 ZSX 2.40
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
OS/2 Systems
|
||
------------
|
||
Other Utilities Other Utilities
|
||
BBS Software Name Version Name Version
|
||
Name Version -------------------- --------------------
|
||
-------------------- ARC 7.12 oMMM 1.52
|
||
Kitten 1.01 ARC2 6.01 Omail 3.1
|
||
SimplexBBS 1.04.02+ ConfMail 4.00 Parselst 1.33
|
||
EchoStat 6.0 PKZip 1.02
|
||
Network Mailers EZPoint 2.1 PMSnoop 1.30
|
||
Name Version FGroup 1.00 PolyXOS2 2.1a
|
||
-------------------- GROUP 2.23 QSort 2.1
|
||
BinkleyTerm(S) 2.50 LH2 2.11 Raid 1.0
|
||
BinkleyTerm/2-MT MSG 4.2 Remapper 1.2
|
||
1.40.02 MsgLink 1.0c Tick 2.0
|
||
SEAmail 1.01 MsgNum 4.16d VPurge 4.09e
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
Xenix/Unix 386 Other Utilities
|
||
-------------- Name Version
|
||
--------------------
|
||
BBS Software Network Mailers ARC 5.21
|
||
Name Version Name Version C-LHARC 1.00
|
||
-------------------- -------------------- MSGLINK 1.01
|
||
oMMM 1.42
|
||
Omail 1.00
|
||
|Contact: Willy Paine 1:343/15,| ParseLst 1.32
|
||
|or Eddy van Loo 2:285/406 | Unzip 3.10
|
||
VPurge 4.08
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 43 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Zoo 2.01
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
BBS Software Macintosh Other Software
|
||
Name Version --------- Name Version
|
||
-------------------- --------------------
|
||
FBBS 0.91 Network Mailers MacArd 0.04
|
||
Hermes 1.6.1 Name Version Mantissa 3.21
|
||
Mansion 7.15 -------------------- Mehitable 2.0
|
||
Precision Sys. 0.95b Copernicus 1.0 OriginatorII 2.0
|
||
Red Ryder Host 2.1 Tabby 2.2 PreStamp 3.2
|
||
Telefinder Host StuffIt Classic 1.6
|
||
2.12T10 Other Software SunDial 3.2
|
||
Name Version TExport 1.92
|
||
-------------------- TimeStamp 1.6
|
||
Point System ArcMac 1.3 TImport 1.92
|
||
Software AreaFix 1.6 Tset 1.3
|
||
Name Version Compact Pro 1.30 TSort 1.0
|
||
-------------------- EventMeister 1.0 UNZIP 1.02c
|
||
Copernicus 1.00 Export 3.21 Zenith 1.5
|
||
CounterPoint 1.09 Import 3.2 Zip Extract 0.10
|
||
MacWoof 1.1 LHARC 0.41
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
Amiga Network Mailers Other Software
|
||
----- Name Version Name Version
|
||
-------------------- --------------------
|
||
BBS Software BinkleyTerm 1.00 Areafix 1.48
|
||
Name Version TrapDoor 1.80 AReceipt 1.5
|
||
-------------------- WelMat 0.44 ChameleonEdit 0.11
|
||
4D-BBS 1.65 ConfMail 1.12
|
||
Falcon CBCS 1.00 ElectricHerald 1.66
|
||
Starnet 1.0q@ Compression FFRS 1.0@
|
||
TransAmiga 1.07 Utilities FileMgr 2.08
|
||
XenoLink 1.0 Name Version Fozzle 1.0@
|
||
-------------------- Login 0.18
|
||
AmigArc 0.23 MessageFilter 1.52
|
||
NodeList Utilities booz 1.01 Message View 1.12
|
||
Name Version LHARC 1.30 oMMM 1.50
|
||
-------------------- LhA 1.10 PolyXAmy 2.02
|
||
ParseLst 1.66 LZ 1.92 RMB 1.30
|
||
Skyparse 2.30 PkAX 1.00 Roof 46.15
|
||
TrapList 1.40 UnZip 4.1 RoboWriter 1.02
|
||
Zippy (Unzip) 1.25 Rsh 4.07a
|
||
Zoo 2.01 Tick 0.75
|
||
TrapToss 1.20
|
||
|Contact: Maximilian Hantsch 2:310/6| Yuck! 2.02
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
BBS Software Atari ST/TT
|
||
Name Version -----------
|
||
--------------------
|
||
FIDOdoor/ST 2.5.1 Network Mailers Other Utilities
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 44 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
FiFo 2.1v Name Version Name Version
|
||
LED ST 1.00 -------------------- --------------------
|
||
QuickBBS/ST 1.06* The Box 1.95* ApplyList 1.00@
|
||
Burep 1.1
|
||
Compression ComScan 1.04
|
||
Utilities NodeList Utilities ConfMail 4.10
|
||
Name Version Name Version Echoscan 1.10
|
||
-------------------- -------------------- FDrenum 2.5.2
|
||
ARC 6.02 ParseList 1.30 FastPack 1.20
|
||
LHARC 2.01i EchoFix 1.20 Import 1.14
|
||
PackConvert sTICK/Hatch 5.50 oMMM 1.40
|
||
STZip 1.1* Pack 1.00
|
||
UnJARST 2.00 Trenum 0.10
|
||
WhatArc 2.02
|
||
|
||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
||
Tandy Color Computer 3 (OS-9 Level II) Other Utilities
|
||
-------------------------------------- Name Version
|
||
--------------------
|
||
BBS Software Compression Utility Ascan 1.2
|
||
Name Version Name Version AutoFRL 2.0
|
||
-------------------- -------------------- Bundle 2.2
|
||
RiBBS 2.02+ Ar 1.3 CKARC 1.1
|
||
DeArc 5.12 EchoCheck 1.01
|
||
OS9Arc 1.0 FReq 2.5a
|
||
UnZip 3.10 LookNode 2.00
|
||
UnLZH 3.0 ParseLST
|
||
PReq 2.2
|
||
RList 1.03
|
||
RTick 2.00
|
||
UnBundle 1.4
|
||
UnSeen 1.1
|
||
|
||
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
|
||
Key to old info:
|
||
+ - Netmail Capable (Doesn't Require Additional Mailer Software)
|
||
* - Recently Updated Version
|
||
@ - New Addition
|
||
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
|
||
|
||
Please send updates and suggestions to: Peter Popovich, 1:363/264
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 45 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
FIDONEWS PUBLIC-KEY
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
[this must be copied out to a file starting at column 1 or
|
||
it won't process under PGP as a valid public-key]
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
||
Version: 2.6.2
|
||
Comment: Clear-signing is Electronic Digital Authenticity!
|
||
|
||
mQCNAzINVLcAAAEEAM5dZN6t6j5Yc0kl7qegVFfiBeVoteuhDg4ay8h43u38Q4kO
|
||
eJ9Mm7J89wXFb9vgouBVb4biIN6bTWCwcXTbGhBe5OIceLvluuxuEKsaIs/UwXNe
|
||
Ogx5azIPhRfC7MJDe41Z8tMEBuHY/NE88cuxQ8yXWO126IRttavu6L/U5BwRAAUR
|
||
tCRGaWRvTmV3cyBFZGl0b3IgPDE6MS8yM0BmaWRvbmV0Lm9yZz6JAJUDBRAyGwFS
|
||
JZMgw7eCKz0BAZl0A/9xrfhpsEOqGiPfjy2qd9dv6tvSVPPVFu+Wy1lGTHYtuTtg
|
||
FIN3fQ47AM3XzqHxWRWvp/xZYgR6sRICL7UFx94ShYBQc7CyqBBZKA0IvIWqXP/g
|
||
c4Br+gQJR6CLiQK7TUyjUbqNbs6QAxuNUi4xFQM+O2Gene5/iTjHFmmSDj2C9YkB
|
||
FQMFEDIOmHDTQ6/52IG1SQEBQ78H/Rz/mleIrtZwFIOhzy3JH4Z6FUTfZuM9nPcs
|
||
1ZLjZCPptHvY7wEYJWGr03lPPJ6tj1VBXwTrWJTf/hOLsoi00GKV8t1thjqGDo23
|
||
O91/bSQ+Vn0vBQ2vOEJys8ftxdoLJAyI5YLzHVT+RsMTQLIXVuPyrNcKs1vC2ql+
|
||
UDHpU1R+9cG9JUEHpGI6z0DPnQ74SKbQH3fiVBpHhYx4BmvcBC4gWQzKMkDWFiq3
|
||
8AssIZ7b9lWl3OBgQ4UM1OIDKoJyjRewIdKyl7zboKSt6Qu8LrcsXO3kb81YshOW
|
||
ZpSS3QDIqfZC4+EElnB15l4RcVwnPHBaQY0FxUr4Vl4UWM36jbuJAJUDBRAyDpgY
|
||
q+7ov9TkHBEBAQGoA/sFfN07IFQcir456tJfBfB9R5Z6e6UKmexaFhWOsLHqbCq6
|
||
3FGXDLeivNn6NTz81QeqLIHglTuM3NP1mu8sw215klAG8G3M1NA2xLw7Eqhspze2
|
||
raGvNeEwxl8e+PY9aZwBj4UWU+CmIm6QNiP0MtvR7QYDIKn5mZCDc3CLmr942IkB
|
||
FQMFEDIOh0O8AhTPqRipPQEB4EYH/1gkDmdHL6lbEkFuQLrylF+weBl0XQ+kv7ER
|
||
vWXYrvIrkppxtc4VAge6CXXEbOGJnvkFHgyNZzO9Q9O64QsmZvjip+4lhDLeNrdH
|
||
X9DizS4YKXxkSKr9Yltmn2/AlBCx6jwcDIfkqy/P1tNWcikxZZMd6KryK0Wsres9
|
||
Ik12OmVmJjQSxb5bS6Q8aYUbV3qwosGXTqy+BzYh/UYAX/XJIWa5kxFVSPKFSZ+5
|
||
toiSzANd9SpHPEogGvQDHJlJ23lmsMx/6uHsR1LTsQ8su8zIk92XyqePJTjlMx2j
|
||
D7KJWNR7Zzu4QHCXBkga5W8l2FfPk7D3+o7bXTLRuR1yTYGdNoiJAJUCBRAyDhwt
|
||
SlKLwP4OFW0BAdaMA/9rcWQlSq44K9JuJ7fZUgt9fwxGreTud9fC8DvlbUW79+CA
|
||
AHLTLLagcEF1OKsWzVBWcA2JEAp+TUTqktRN0oD8vnaw3uNJd1G5KK59hw0WR8x1
|
||
v4ivypbSjiq95Y3gBunb7WjpyiFRWDlm0PrKrWHtbWzjnpPIpetln1UuqsSfbokB
|
||
FQIFEDIOG9C3N61ZQ4Dr/QEBIzMH/1VxxztmBPBszbjZLDO8Svcax9Ng8IcWpcDy
|
||
WqHCAA2Hoe5VtMD0v6w31ZgVqTPIvCark2Y/aTR1GofiuN9NUqbVV534AgAYLzYk
|
||
DMT1swsPvqDTpOYgQl6PCGh6A5JGAbWJfKkX9XCUHJAAmiTsEVRNnjOgL+p6qjoh
|
||
EfIG8CGehghWSRKl5eGeDAtbXupZKNjFI1t2XV+ks0RFQ/RPuTH7pF7pk7WO6Cyg
|
||
+Dk2ZMgua0HRL1fXvHKb5Xzr3MVgsbAl5gP8ooIiD9MI/x5Irh3oo58VyoEZNBs/
|
||
Kz+drGFDPljcS6fdiVCFtYIzMrshY6YsfLi0aB8fwOvFtxgBqli0J0NocmlzdG9w
|
||
aGVyIEJha2VyIDwxOjE4LzE0QGZpZG9uZXQub3JnPrQoQ2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgQmFr
|
||
ZXIgPGNiYWtlcjg0QGRpZ2l0YWwubmV0Pg==
|
||
=61OQ
|
||
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
||
|
||
|
||
File-request FNEWSKEY from 1:1/23 [1:18/14] or download it from the
|
||
Rights On! BBS at 1-904-409-7040 anytime except 0100-0130 ET and Zone
|
||
1 ZMH at 1200-9600+ HST/V32B. The FidoNews key is also available on
|
||
the FidoNews homepage listed in the Masthead information.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 46 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
FIDONET BY INTERNET
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
This is a list of all FidoNet-related sites reported to the Editor as
|
||
of this appearance.
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
FidoNet:
|
||
|
||
Homepage http://www.fidonet.org
|
||
FidoNews http://ddi.digital.net/~cbaker84/fidonews.html
|
||
HTML FNews http://www.geocities.com/Athens/6894/
|
||
WWW sources http://www.scms.rgu.ac.uk/students/cs_yr94/lk/fido.html
|
||
FTSC page http://www2.blaze.net.au/ftsc.html
|
||
Echomail http://www.portal.ca/~awalker/index.html
|
||
WebRing http://ddi.digital.net/~cbaker84/fnetring.html
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Zone 1: http://www.z1.fidonet.org
|
||
|
||
Region 10:
|
||
http://www.psnw.com/~net205/region10.html
|
||
http://www.dharmanet.org/BDO/net125.html
|
||
|
||
Region 15:
|
||
http://www.smrtsys.com/region15/
|
||
|
||
Region 17:
|
||
http://www.portal.ca/~awalker/region17.htm
|
||
|
||
Region 18:
|
||
http://www.citicom.com/fido.html
|
||
|
||
Region 19:
|
||
http://ccove.n-link.com/
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Zone 2: http://www.z2.fidonet.org
|
||
ZEC2 http://fidoftp.paralex.co.uk/zec.htm
|
||
|
||
Region 29: http://www.rtfm.be/fidonet/ (in French)
|
||
Region 36: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/7207/
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Zone 3: http://www.z3.fidonet.org
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Zone 4:
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 47 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
Zone 5:
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Zone 6: http://www.z6.fidonet.org
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 48 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
FIDONEWS INFORMATION
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
------- FIDONEWS MASTHEAD AND CONTACT INFORMATION -------
|
||
|
||
Editor: Christopher Baker
|
||
|
||
Editors Emeritii: Thom Henderson, Dale Lovell,
|
||
Vince Perriello, Tim Pozar,
|
||
Tom Jennings, Sylvia Maxwell,
|
||
Donald Tees
|
||
|
||
"FidoNews Editor"
|
||
FidoNet 1:1/23
|
||
BBS 1-904-409-7040, 300/1200/2400/14400/V.32bis/HST(ds)
|
||
|
||
more addresses:
|
||
Christopher Baker -- 1:18/14, cbaker84@digital.net
|
||
cbaker84@aol.com
|
||
cbaker84@msn.com
|
||
cbak.rights@opus.global.org
|
||
|
||
(Postal Service mailing address)
|
||
FidoNews Editor
|
||
P.O. Box 471
|
||
Edgewater, FL 32132-0471
|
||
U.S.A.
|
||
|
||
|
||
voice: 1-904-409-3040 [1400-2100 ET only, please]
|
||
[1800-0100 UTC/GMT]
|
||
|
||
------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FidoNews is published weekly by and for the members of the FIDONET
|
||
INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR ELECTRONIC MAIL system. It is a compilation
|
||
of individual articles contributed by their authors or their
|
||
authorized agents. The contribution of articles to this compilation
|
||
does not diminish the rights of the authors. OPINIONS EXPRESSED in
|
||
these articles ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS and not necessarily those of
|
||
FidoNews.
|
||
|
||
Authors retain copyright on individual works; otherwise FidoNews is
|
||
Copyright 1996 Christopher Baker. All rights reserved. Duplication
|
||
and/or distribution permitted for noncommercial purposes only. For
|
||
use in other circumstances, please contact the original authors, or
|
||
the Editor.
|
||
|
||
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
||
|
||
OBTAINING COPIES: The most recent issue of FidoNews in electronic
|
||
form may be obtained from the FidoNews Editor via manual download or
|
||
file-request, or from various sites in the FidoNet and Internet.
|
||
PRINTED COPIES may be obtained by sending SASE to the above postal
|
||
address. File-request FIDONEWS for the current Issue. File-request
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 49 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
FNEWS for the current month in one archive. Or file-request specific
|
||
back Issue filenames in distribution format [FNEWSDnn.LZH] for a
|
||
particular Issue. Monthly Volumes are available as FNWSmmmy.ZIP
|
||
where mmm = three letter month [JAN - DEC] and y = last digit of the
|
||
current year [6], i.e., FNWSMAY6.ZIP for all the Issues from May 96.
|
||
|
||
Annual volumes are available as FNEWSn.ZIP where n = the Volume number
|
||
1 - 12 for 1984 - 1995, respectively. Annual Volume archives range in
|
||
size from 48K to 1.2M.
|
||
|
||
|
||
INTERNET USERS: FidoNews is available via:
|
||
|
||
http://www.fidonet.org/fidonews.htm
|
||
ftp://ftp.fidonet.org/pub/fidonet/fidonews/
|
||
ftp://ftp.aminet.org/pub/aminet/comm/fido/
|
||
|
||
*=*=*
|
||
|
||
You may obtain an email subscription to FidoNews by sending email to:
|
||
|
||
jbarchuk@worldnet.att.net
|
||
|
||
with a Subject line of: subscribe fnews-edist
|
||
|
||
and no message in the message body. To remove your name from the email
|
||
distribution use a Subject line of: unsubscribe fnews-edist with no
|
||
message to the same address above.
|
||
|
||
*=*=*
|
||
|
||
You can read the current FidoNews Issue in HTML format at:
|
||
|
||
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/6894/
|
||
|
||
STAR SOURCE for ALL Past Issues via FTP and file-request -
|
||
Available for FReq from 1:396/1 or by anonymous FTP from:
|
||
|
||
ftp://ftp.sstar.com/fidonet/fnews/
|
||
|
||
Each yearly archive also contains a listing of the Table-of-Contents
|
||
for that year's issues. The total set is currently about 11 Megs.
|
||
|
||
=*=*=*=
|
||
|
||
The current week's FidoNews and the FidoNews public-key are now also
|
||
available almost immediately after publication on the Editor's new
|
||
homepage on the World Wide Web at:
|
||
|
||
http://ddi.digital.net/~cbaker84/fidonews.html
|
||
|
||
There are also links there to jim barchuk's HTML FidoNews source and
|
||
to John Souvestre's FTP site for the archives. There is also an email
|
||
link for sending in an article as message text. Drop on over.
|
||
|
||
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
||
FIDONEWS 14-05 Page 50 3 Feb 1997
|
||
|
||
|
||
A PGP generated public-key is available for the FidoNews Editor from
|
||
1:1/23 [1:18/14] by file-request for FNEWSKEY or by download from
|
||
Rights On! BBS at 1-904-409-7040 as FIDONEWS.ASC in File Area 18. It
|
||
is also posted twice a month into the PKEY_DROP Echo available on the
|
||
Zone 1 Echomail Backbone.
|
||
|
||
*=*=*=*=*
|
||
|
||
SUBMISSIONS: You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
|
||
FidoNews. Article submission requirements are contained in the file
|
||
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from the FidoNews Editor, or file-requestable
|
||
from 1:1/23 [1:18/14] as file "ARTSPEC.DOC". ALL Zone Coordinators
|
||
also have copies of ARTSPEC.DOC. Please read it.
|
||
|
||
"Fido", "FidoNet" and the dog-with-diskette are U.S. registered
|
||
trademarks of Tom Jennings, P.O. Box 410923, San Francisco, CA 94141,
|
||
and are used with permission.
|
||
|
||
"Disagreement is actually necessary,
|
||
or we'd all have to get in fights
|
||
or something to amuse ourselves
|
||
and create the requisite chaos."
|
||
-Tom Jennings
|
||
|
||
-30-
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|