1300 lines
66 KiB
Plaintext
1300 lines
66 KiB
Plaintext
F I D O N E W S -- Vol.13 No. 9 (26-Feb-1996)
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| A newsletter of the | ISSN 1198-4589 Published by: |
|
||
| FidoNet BBS community | "FidoNews" BBS |
|
||
| _ | +1-519-570-4176 |
|
||
| / \ | |
|
||
| /|oo \ | |
|
||
| (_| /_) | |
|
||
| _`@/_ \ _ | |
|
||
| | | \ \\ | Editors: |
|
||
| | (*) | \ )) | Donald Tees 1:221/192 |
|
||
| |__U__| / \// | |
|
||
| _//|| _\ / | |
|
||
| (_/(_|(____/ | |
|
||
| (jm) | Newspapers should have no friends. |
|
||
| | -- JOSEPH PULITZER |
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| Submission address: editors 1:1/23 |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| MORE addresses: |
|
||
| |
|
||
| submissions=> editor@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca |
|
||
| Don -- don@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| For information, copyrights, article submissions, |
|
||
| obtaining copies of fidonews or the internet gateway faq |
|
||
| please refer to the end of this file. |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
|
||
1. Editorial..................................................... 1
|
||
2. Articles...................................................... 2
|
||
Problem User--Please Help!.................................. 2
|
||
FIDOTIPS.................................................... 11
|
||
Fidonet and Politics........................................ 18
|
||
FIDONEWS SUBMISSION......................................... 20
|
||
3. Fidonews Information.......................................... 22
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Editorial
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 2 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
I am sitting at my computer, and looking at Ex_Libris BBS,
|
||
my Fidonet BBS. It runs on an old AT hooked up by ethernet to
|
||
my network. I has a 30 meg hard disk, a monochrome monitor, and
|
||
640K. Not that the size matters, the dik drive is only a
|
||
bootstrap device anyway. The fact is, though, that when that
|
||
old AT goes, I wonder if I will bother putting the BBS back
|
||
online.
|
||
|
||
I enjoy Fidonet. I enjoy it very much, and I like the people
|
||
that I know in the net. They are like familly, in a way. I
|
||
have known them through two marriages now, and followed the same
|
||
old tired threads with amusement through a generation of new
|
||
sysops. I am not even that early a member, having joined late
|
||
in the 80's.
|
||
|
||
But the fact is, that Fidonet is dying. Not through lack of
|
||
will, nor through lack of need. We are facing technological
|
||
obsolesence. We have allowed our software particularly to
|
||
become as obsolete as that old AT of mine. In another 10 years,
|
||
there will not be a machine in existance that will run our
|
||
software.
|
||
|
||
As a computer professional, I cannot afford to stay in the
|
||
dark ages of communications technology. As a hobbiest, I do not
|
||
want to. I have to move over to the internet style of
|
||
communications. The next node I put up will be an internet
|
||
node. Fidonet? Do I run two BBS's? Just for nostalgia's sake
|
||
for a few years? Probably. For a few years.
|
||
|
||
It would be real nice to have a migration pattern. I want
|
||
to hook in and get mail at dtees@fidonet.org. I want my users to
|
||
get mail at joe_smith@exlibris.fidonet.org.
|
||
|
||
How do we get there from here? We have a year, maybe two.
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Articles
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Problem User--Please Help!
|
||
by Sarah Nunez, 1:130/604
|
||
|
||
THE SITUATION:
|
||
|
||
There is a BBS user in San Antonio by the name of Joe Falls, who has
|
||
been exceedingly disruptive in several FidoNet echoes, including
|
||
AVIATION and FLYING. We lost quite a number of highly-respected,
|
||
extremely knowledgeable participants because of Joe's behavior. He also
|
||
repeatedly violated other rules of the echo, and flamed the moderators
|
||
every time they tried to enforce them. As a result, he has been
|
||
permanently banned from both of these echoes. However, he still reads
|
||
the two echoes, and is continuing his attacks via Internet e-mail from
|
||
the address shbjsale@ix.netcom.com. For reasons known only to him, he
|
||
often sends carbon copies of his messages to as many as 20 people at
|
||
once, sometimes to people who weren't even party to the original echo
|
||
discussion to which he refers. Approximately 30 of us are his usual
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 3 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
targets. E-mail to the postmaster of his Internet Service Provider
|
||
has been to no avail.
|
||
|
||
He continually needles people about minor details (spelling, grammar,
|
||
typos), refuses to follow simple rules, and flames anyone who disagrees
|
||
with his sometimes-distorted views of reality. He is obnoxious,
|
||
antagonistic, vindictive, rude, unmannerly, belligerent, and behaves not
|
||
at all like the officer and gentleman he supposedly once was (he's a
|
||
retired USAF colonel). He has particular vendettas against several
|
||
well-respected, long-time participants of the two echoes, and has no
|
||
qualms about venting his opinions of them. Anyone who comes to their
|
||
defense, or who even politely suggests that he tone it down
|
||
immediately becomes his next target. Some of Joe's attacks have
|
||
included racial slurs. He also includes, at times, thinly veiled
|
||
threats of (groundless) legal action (such threats are a violation of
|
||
FidoNet Policy), character assassination, and insults to his target's
|
||
family.
|
||
|
||
THE SOLUTION:
|
||
|
||
If he can no longer read the AVIATION and FLYING echoes, he will have
|
||
nothing about which to harrass other users. In light of that, please do
|
||
not give him even *read* access to either of these two echoes. He often
|
||
logs on to BBSes in other parts of the country, sometimes under one or
|
||
more aliases, since time, distance, and money are apparently no object
|
||
to him. Sometimes he "borrows" the name of one of his primary targets
|
||
to use as his alias, so twit filters and auto-deletion programs aren't
|
||
much help, although his writing style is very distinctive. If he uses
|
||
an alias to log onto your BBS, though, you can always catch him with a
|
||
call-back verifier. (At your request, I will netmail you the phone
|
||
number he calls from.) Also, please circulate this article to others in
|
||
your net/region who might not regularly read FidoNews. We greatly
|
||
appreciate your help in our endeavor to rid ourselves of this man's
|
||
tirades.
|
||
|
||
You may reach me via direct netmail to 1:130/604 *ONLY* between midnight
|
||
and 5am Central. You may also route netmail through my NC (1:130/0) or
|
||
my hub (1:130/600) anytime.
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
File date: 15 February 1996
|
||
This file, FIDOTIPS.TXT, includes information on Echo Etiquette on FidoNet
|
||
(as well as on similar nets). Included are message writing, quoting, netmail,
|
||
advertisements, test messages, personal discussions, off-topicness,
|
||
chain letters and blanket messages, subject lines, and other things of
|
||
interest to all readers. The purpose of this file is to educate echo
|
||
users in basic echo etiquette.
|
||
|
||
A companion file, also concerning FidoNet, is called FIDOFAQ.ZIP. That
|
||
file is available for download/freq from 1:202/701 or 1:202/711, Pacific
|
||
Rim Information, San Diego, CA, anytime except ZMH.
|
||
|
||
Echo moderators are welcome to use these tips in their moderator duties.
|
||
Sysops are welcome to use these tips as bulletins or in other BBS areas,
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 4 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
or make it available for download/freq by users and other sysops.
|
||
Please leave the information as it stands. If there is information to
|
||
be updated or corrected, please netmail the author (FidoNet/FamilyNet
|
||
address below) for possible adjustment in a later release.
|
||
|
||
WRITING A MESSAGE
|
||
|
||
I see these messages in the conference areas. Do these people all know
|
||
each other?
|
||
Most echo participants have never met in person. The purpose of
|
||
conference areas are for exchange of information and conversation. Many
|
||
people stay in the same conference areas and begin to get to know each
|
||
other as pen pals, so they seem like friends who have known each other
|
||
for awhile.
|
||
|
||
How can I get involved?
|
||
Read an echo whose topic interests you for a month or two. If
|
||
the conversations interest you, and you are aware of the echo rules,
|
||
find the Reply key on your BBS editor or offline reader and hit it.
|
||
Using normal typing (upper and lower case), respond. Most likely you'll
|
||
get a response to your message within a week or so. Many people find
|
||
that getting messages is like getting personal mail in your snailmail
|
||
box...more fun than bills! As one sysop said about messages: "ya gotta
|
||
write 'em to get 'em!"
|
||
|
||
WRITING A ONE-SIZE FITS ALL MESSAGE
|
||
|
||
I want to thank more than one person for their advice or commentary
|
||
on a thread I was interested in...what do I do? Or...I find myself
|
||
saying the same thing to several people....what do I do?
|
||
Rather than writing each person an individual message, write
|
||
a blanket message that conveys the information you want to relay, and
|
||
then address your message to ALL. If you want to ensure that someone
|
||
in particular (or everyone) gets credit, thank them
|
||
individually within one message.
|
||
One message (vice a dozen) saves echo bandwith, sysop phone bills,
|
||
and moderator wrath. :)
|
||
|
||
QUOTING
|
||
|
||
How much should I quote?
|
||
It is standard to quote only those portions of a message
|
||
that will remind the recipient of what the conversation was about. Four lines
|
||
is usually plenty. Quoting the taglines, origin lines, message
|
||
headers, or anything similar is a waste of bytes. If you're not sure how
|
||
to quote, either read the docs to your offline reader, or ask a sysop or
|
||
another informed user for help.
|
||
|
||
I agree with something someone said, but don't have anything to
|
||
add to the conversation. What do I do?
|
||
It's not really necessary to reply unless you have something
|
||
more to say.
|
||
|
||
SOMEONE IS OFF TOPIC
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 5 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
I see a message where someone is off-topic on the echo, and I want to
|
||
respond to the topic. How should I handle it?
|
||
There are several ways of responding. One method is to let the person
|
||
know you saw their message but that you know it's off-topic, and ask if they
|
||
have access to a more appropriate echo or to netmail. Or, if you know they have
|
||
access to netmail (or suspect that they do), respond via netmail. A third
|
||
way, a very appropriate way when seeing ads or blanket messages in echoes,
|
||
is to ignore the message and let the moderator handle it. If you think
|
||
the moderator may not have noticed the off-topic thread, or if it's
|
||
really bugging you, contact the moderator via netmail. Chances are that
|
||
the moderators have already taken care of the matter, though.
|
||
|
||
I see a message where someone is suggesting doing something
|
||
illegal. What do I do about it?
|
||
Sit back and ignore the message if you can, as the
|
||
moderators have probably already taken care of it. If you can't ignore it,
|
||
contact the moderator via netmail. It's not necessary to create more
|
||
bandwith and junkmail in the echo by continuing the thread.
|
||
|
||
How can anything be "off-topic"? This is a free country, and the Bill of
|
||
Rights guarantees me free speech!
|
||
FidoNet is not a democracy, nor is there any guarantee of free
|
||
speech within FidoNet or its echoes. FidoNet is a network for amateur
|
||
computer modeming hobbyists.
|
||
Echoes with topics were created so that people could read
|
||
threads/conversations on topics they enjoy. If everyone gets off
|
||
topic, the echo overflows and people have to wade through the mess just
|
||
to find the messages that interest them.
|
||
|
||
CHAIN LETTERS AND BLANKET MESSAGES
|
||
|
||
Should I respond to a message that is obviously a chain letter?
|
||
No. The best advice is to ignore it, and let the moderator
|
||
handle it. Usually, a chain letter is perpetrated by a "hit and
|
||
run" participant. The person drops the chain letter into every echo that
|
||
a given BBS has, and never responds to further echomail on the
|
||
subject. Regardless of what the letter may say, you aren't asking for bad
|
||
luck by not responding...at least not in this author's humble opinion.
|
||
|
||
Should I turn this chain letter into the Post Office?
|
||
Most FidoNet moderators would *not* want you to. Unless the
|
||
chain letter promises that something bad will happen if you don't
|
||
respond to it, the Post Office won't get involved anyway.
|
||
|
||
Are those stories really true?
|
||
Here's a brief synopsis of the most popular chain letters
|
||
and blanket messages sent via modem, and their stories:
|
||
"Craig Shergold wants cards": boy is not dying any more, he was
|
||
cured. "Modem tax": the bill lasted about 5 minutes before it was
|
||
killed on the floor. "$250 Cookie Recipe": Neiman Marcus never sold
|
||
chocolate chip cookie recipes. Any other versions
|
||
of the story (including Mrs. Fields' cookie) are also equally
|
||
false. "Religious broadcasting ban by FCC": Was also killed before it came
|
||
up for a vote. "Dave Rhodes": is in jail, we're told.
|
||
If it sounds too good to be true, or sounds illegal, don't
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 6 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
react to it.
|
||
|
||
SUBJECT LINES
|
||
|
||
I get so aggravated when I see a subject line that does not match
|
||
the content of the message. What can I do?
|
||
It would be helpful to all readers if all message posters
|
||
would check the subject line after they hit the Reply key, and change it
|
||
if necessary. Most software makes this quite easy to do these days.
|
||
If you are unsure about how to do that, either read the offline reader
|
||
docs or ask your sysop.
|
||
|
||
TEST MESSAGES
|
||
|
||
Why are there test messages? Should I answer them? How can I test
|
||
an echo to see if it's working?
|
||
If you are setting up an echo on a board or offline reader,
|
||
it is better to enter an initialization message or an on-topic message than the
|
||
boring "TESTING" type message into a new echo. If your system has
|
||
been carrying echoes all along, you shouldn't need a test message
|
||
anyway. Test messages belong in regional echoes, not in international
|
||
backbone conferences. If you receive an answer to your initialization or
|
||
on-topic introductory message, you will know your message got out.
|
||
|
||
If you are a user and see a test message in a backbone conference,
|
||
sit back and let the moderator/s respond.
|
||
|
||
Examples of "test" messages that would qualify:
|
||
"Sopwhith Camel BBS is now echoing this conference, would
|
||
the moderator/s please forward a copy of the rules for our users?"
|
||
"I'm John, and I've been interested in xxxx all along.
|
||
Would xxxx be an example of.....(continuing along the topical lines)"
|
||
|
||
PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS
|
||
|
||
Oops...where am I?
|
||
On some BBS software, it is very easy to be in the wrong
|
||
conference at the wrong time. Please be sure you are in a local area, netmail,
|
||
or "Comments to the Sysop" area before posting private messages.
|
||
|
||
This message is getting way off-topic and I'll just bet it's only
|
||
of interest to two of us. What should I do?
|
||
If you are in the midst of a backbone echo, and your
|
||
conversation appears to be only to the interest of two of you, consider taking
|
||
the conversation to netmail.
|
||
|
||
Can I just set the Private bit on my message so that no one else will
|
||
read it?
|
||
No. Somewhere along the line, the Private bit will be stripped
|
||
and your private message will be released to the public anyway. It's the
|
||
nature of various software. Use netmail or snailmail for privacy.
|
||
|
||
ADS OR FOR SALE MESSAGES
|
||
|
||
Can I write or answer an ad in a FidoNet echo?
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 7 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
There are a few echoes where ads are encouraged. These types of
|
||
echoes usually have the words "FOR SALE" in their name someplace.
|
||
Other than those, ads are specifically off-topic in many FidoNet echoes.
|
||
If you have something for sale, and want to advertise it, look for an
|
||
appropriate echo. Then watch for the echo's rules posting to ensure that your
|
||
ad would be considered topical. Be sure to note the difference between
|
||
a personal ad and a commercial ad. Ads for BBS's are allowed in some,
|
||
but not all, echoes.
|
||
If you see an ad in an echo where you know it is off-topic, treat
|
||
it like an off-topic message. Sit back and let the moderators handle
|
||
it.
|
||
|
||
I want to let everyone know of a product that I've found to be helpful,
|
||
but I have no financial interest in the product. Is that considered an
|
||
ad?
|
||
Probably not, but it's best to keep an eye on the echo's rules
|
||
and "flavor" before saying anything at all.
|
||
|
||
May I share an address of a store or mail order place, or is that an ad
|
||
for that place?
|
||
It will depend, again, on the echo in question. Check on the
|
||
echo's rules before posting anything, or netmail the moderator and ask.
|
||
|
||
NETMAIL
|
||
|
||
What is netmail? How does it differ from echomail?
|
||
Netmail is a personal message. If you want to send someone
|
||
a message that you don't want everyone else to read, send it netmail
|
||
if you can. If echomail is the party line of years past, netmail is
|
||
the private lines of today.
|
||
However, "personal" can be misleading. Depending on how the
|
||
netmail is sent, more than just the sender and receiver could read
|
||
this message. If absolute privacy is necessary, send it snailmail!
|
||
|
||
How do I access netmail?
|
||
If you are a BBS user, you may want to discuss netmail
|
||
privileges with your sysop. Since netmail often costs money, you
|
||
may have to be a subscriber of a system, or offer a few dollars
|
||
donation in exchange for the privilege. It may be called Matrix Mail.
|
||
|
||
Why does my sysop allow me to receive netmail, but not send a
|
||
reply? OR Why don't I get incoming netmail?
|
||
These are problems to discuss with your sysop. Your sysop
|
||
should be able to forward incoming netmail to you in another forum, if the
|
||
bbs software does not allow users to receive mail in the netmail area.
|
||
Outgoing netmail may cost your sysop some money. (See "How do I
|
||
access netmail?")
|
||
|
||
No matter what, my sysop still won't allow me to access netmail.
|
||
However, I'm going way off topic in the echo. Can I explain in the echo
|
||
that I don't have netmail privileges so that I can continue my
|
||
conversation?
|
||
It usually won't work...most moderators will not want you off
|
||
topic in the echo. Explanations don't help..and neither does the
|
||
tagline that says "I'll get back on topic, I swear, Mr. Moderator!"
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 8 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
You can take several different steps. See "How Do I Access
|
||
Netmail"...money works wonders with many sysops for netmail privileges.
|
||
|
||
How about if I just hit "Yes" when the editor asks me if I should mark a
|
||
message "Private"? Won't that solve the netmail problem?
|
||
It rarely works. Believe it or not, there is still BBS software
|
||
out there that will not allow a message with a private bit set (a
|
||
private message) in an echo. So, it strips the private bit from the
|
||
message, and sends it on. Anyone getting the message after it hits that
|
||
system will see it in the echo...including the moderator.
|
||
The "Private" setting is usually safe in the (C)omment to Sysop
|
||
message area and in the netmail area. In echomail areas, it's best to
|
||
type "No" when the editor asks "Private?"
|
||
|
||
INTERNET E-MAIL
|
||
|
||
I've heard that FidoNet users can access Internet e-mail. How is this
|
||
done?
|
||
Many boards connected to FidoNet are also Internet carriers.
|
||
Some of them have the proper software to "gate" netmail between FidoNet
|
||
and Internet.
|
||
|
||
Can I get Internet e-mail on the BBS that I use? Can I send Internet
|
||
e-mail?
|
||
It will depend on your sysop. The best way to find out is to ask
|
||
your sysop. If you *are* the sysop, and you can send/receive FidoNet
|
||
netmail, then you have Internet e-mail privileges already.
|
||
|
||
What's my Internet address?
|
||
Ask your sysop.
|
||
|
||
How do I send an Internet e-mail?
|
||
Address a message in a netmail folder/area to your
|
||
local UUCP gate (check your nodelist or ask around your net to find your
|
||
local gate). Use a subject line just like you would in a netmail
|
||
message.
|
||
The first line of the netmail message should contain TO: and the
|
||
address of the recipient. Skip a line, then start your message on the
|
||
third line of the netmail message. Sign as you would a FidoNet netmail
|
||
message. You may want to include your own e-mail address somewhere in
|
||
the body of your message, if the recipient does not keep your address on
|
||
hand.
|
||
A new way to address an Internet email is in the TO: line. Just
|
||
put the entire Internet address of the recipient in the TO: line of the
|
||
netmail, then the local Fido<>Internet in the address field.
|
||
You can send the netmail via crashmail to the gating site, or
|
||
you can route it to the gate.
|
||
|
||
How do I receive an Internet e-mail?
|
||
It will arrive just as regular netmail, and look similar as
|
||
well. Some UUCP gates will send it crashmail, and others will route it
|
||
with outgoing routed netmail.
|
||
|
||
Is it reliable?
|
||
It will depend on your local gate. Be aware, tho, that each
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 9 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
gate may not have software
|
||
that will "bounce" a misaddressed e-mail like might happen from a
|
||
regular Internet site.
|
||
`
|
||
INFORMATION TO BE SHARED
|
||
|
||
Is it considered safe to post my address and phone number in an echo?
|
||
This will depend a lot on the echo itself, and on your own feelings of
|
||
safety and privacy. People have had different experiences with this, so
|
||
it is best to make your own decision. One may feel safer posting an
|
||
address or phone number in one echo but not in another, because of the nature of the
|
||
echo.
|
||
|
||
MODERATOR DECISIONS
|
||
|
||
Who is the moderator of an echo/conference?
|
||
The moderator is the host or hostess of an echo, there to ensure
|
||
that FidoNet policy and echo's rules are being followed. Some echoes
|
||
have a moderating team. To find out who the moderators are, consult the
|
||
ELIST file, or watch for the echo's rules posting. Most moderators place
|
||
their name/s at the end of the rules posting, or in the header, along
|
||
with their FidoNet address. Rules are usually posted monthly, or more
|
||
often.
|
||
|
||
I don't like a decision that a moderator has made regarding an echo
|
||
rule infraction. What can I do about it?
|
||
Most moderators consider their decisions in their echo as final,
|
||
and FidoNet has no policy to define that. Complaining about it in the
|
||
echo is in bad taste, and many times considered "off topic". Consider
|
||
contacting the moderator via netmail to register (tactfully) your
|
||
concern for a decision, comments (positive and negative) about the echo,
|
||
or questions about what is topical and what is not.
|
||
|
||
I don't like the way an echo is run. What can I do about it?
|
||
You may want to contact the moderator to clear up any
|
||
uncertainties or questions about an echo. Perhaps you are in an echo
|
||
that doesn't meet your expectations because the topic is not what you're
|
||
looking for. The moderator may give you a suggestion towards a more
|
||
appropriate echo. Of course, this is most appropriately done via
|
||
netmail in most echoes.
|
||
If that doesn't work, then you may want to vote with your feet.
|
||
Stop reading that echo. Consider starting your own echo. True, there are
|
||
a lot of duplicated topics within FidoNet backbone, because of this
|
||
option, but in several cases, an echo with a Hitler-type moderator has
|
||
disappeared entirely.
|
||
|
||
I've been invited to leave an echo that I really didn't want to leave.
|
||
Can I appeal to someone?
|
||
Moderator decisions are final. If a moderator decides that you
|
||
must leave an echo (either temporarily or permanently), you will be
|
||
leaving. NECs and RECs will, in most cases, back the moderator,
|
||
since they are not authorized by current policy to become mediators or judges.
|
||
If you have been asked to leave temporarily, you will have to
|
||
contact the moderator to ask if s/he will contact your feed to
|
||
reinstate, or if it will be up to you to reinstate yourself. This
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 10 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
should, of course, be done via netmail.
|
||
|
||
I'm in an echo where the moderator doesn't seem to be present. What
|
||
should I do?
|
||
First, check the ELIST (a monthly file listing of backbone
|
||
echoes and their moderators). If the echo is listed in the ELIST,
|
||
netmail the moderator. If the echo is not listed in the ELIST, then you
|
||
can make discreet inquiries about who the moderator was/is. This is best
|
||
done via netmail, asking the persons who seem to have been around the
|
||
echo for a long period of time about the status of the moderator.
|
||
Ofttimes an interim moderator is taking over and the echo is only
|
||
temporarily un-elisted.
|
||
If all comes up negative, the echo could hold an election for a
|
||
new moderator.
|
||
|
||
COMMON-NAME-ITIS
|
||
|
||
My name is John Smith, and I keep getting echomail for another John
|
||
Smith. What can I do to ensure that I get only my own echomail?
|
||
If you have a common name, chances are that you may meet someone
|
||
with the same name on the echoes. Most BBS software will be triggered to
|
||
hand you any mail addressed to your name. The software isn't able to
|
||
distinguish between John Smith in Pocatella, Idaho, and John Smith in
|
||
Norfolk, Virginia. You will get all mail addressed to John Smith, even
|
||
in echoes that you do not regularly read.
|
||
First way to combat the problem is not to respond to any
|
||
messages that are in echoes that you don't read. Then, consider adding a
|
||
middle initial to your log-on name or to your offline reader. When
|
||
logging onto any new board, remember to add the middle initial. If you
|
||
need help in doing this, ask your sysop for help.
|
||
|
||
ALL-CAPS-ITIS
|
||
|
||
Why shouldn't I type in all caps?
|
||
Typing in all capital letters is a strain on the reader's eyes.
|
||
It is much easier to read a combination of upper and lower case letters.
|
||
In messaging, typing in all caps is like shouting, done only when you
|
||
really need to emphasize a point.
|
||
If it is at all possible on your computer system and editor,
|
||
please turn the Caps Lock key off.
|
||
|
||
Donna Ransdell
|
||
Echo Mom/Moderator, PARENTS
|
||
Co-Moderator, CONSUMER_REPORT
|
||
Co-Mod,SEW_&_QUILT
|
||
1:202/211 FidoNet
|
||
8:7705/11 FamilyNet
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 11 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
Update: 15 February 1996
|
||
This file is intended to answer some of the "Frequently Asked Questions"
|
||
concerning messaging on FIDOnet. To help, I've divided it into questions
|
||
concerning messages themselves, echoes, netmail, and special terminology. This
|
||
should explain how messages are written, get from place to place, as
|
||
well as various abbreviations and terms that are used within FIDOnet
|
||
echoes.
|
||
|
||
FIDOnet is an amateur network started by Tom Jennings, who wrote
|
||
software called FIDO. Thus, FIDOnet is a trademarked term. It started
|
||
primarily as a way for sysops to communicate with each other. Netmail
|
||
was (and still is) its primary responsibility. Echomail is a subsidiary
|
||
and still isn't addressed very well within FIDOnet standards.
|
||
|
||
MESSAGE WRITING
|
||
|
||
How do I reply to a message?
|
||
This will vary on each BBS, as there are
|
||
different software and editors used from board to board. Look on the
|
||
bottom of your screen for a menu line, for the key to use to reply. In
|
||
many cases it is R, or Alt-R. If in doubt, ask your sysop.
|
||
|
||
How do I enter a brand new message?
|
||
On the message menu, there will be a
|
||
key to use to Enter a New Message. If in doubt, ask your sysop.
|
||
|
||
How do I quote someone else's message?
|
||
There are as many ways to do this as there are medicines in this
|
||
world. The best suggestion is to look for a menu bar, or ask your sysop
|
||
for help.
|
||
|
||
It seems like some people have a preoccupation with colons and
|
||
parenthesis markings. What are those?
|
||
Turn your face sideways. You will see a smiley face. :-)
|
||
Occasionally, other symbols are added or substituted. See a wink, ;-), a
|
||
halo @:-), a sad face :-(, a face with glasses 8-), a surprised
|
||
expression :-0. We can't see facial expression in writing, so this is a
|
||
way to ensure that our writing is taken the way it would if we were
|
||
discussing this face to face.
|
||
You may also see ((grin)) or (VBG)-very big grin, and others in
|
||
message writing. Once again, this will convey feeling to your message.
|
||
Please feel free to use these, particularly if you are making a joke or
|
||
play on words.
|
||
|
||
I see lots of abbreviations that I don't understand. What do they mean?
|
||
IMHO - In My Humble Opinion.
|
||
BTW - By The Way.
|
||
OTOH - On The Other Hand
|
||
ROFL - rolling on the floor laughing
|
||
MIL, FIL, SIL, BIL - your inlaws
|
||
There are many of these, but these are the most common ones.
|
||
In addition, some echoes will have abbreviations that are common only to
|
||
their echoes. If in doubt, question it! You'll probably get a friendly
|
||
reply...we were all new at this at one time or another.
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 12 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
What's an offline reader?
|
||
To save time on-line, and perhaps your phone bill, consider the
|
||
use of an offline reader such as BlueWave, XRS, OLX, etc., if you find
|
||
yourself hooked on messages. Ask your sysop if his/her bbs supports an
|
||
offline reader, and for suggestions for your system.
|
||
|
||
Anything I shouldn't do?
|
||
First of all, watch out for an echo's guidelines/rules. Know
|
||
them before you post (write) your first message. One thing that gets
|
||
many first-time-posters is typing in all caps. That's like shouting! so
|
||
turn off your Caps Lock key if you have one. Another thing...if it isn't
|
||
easily typed from the keyboard, don't use it. Some first-timers love to
|
||
use that "high ASCII" that has to be typed with the Alt key held down.
|
||
This is highly controversial within FIDOnet, so be careful where you use
|
||
it! Also note that most echoes cannot handle Private messages, so be
|
||
sure to send anything private via netmail. (See Section below about
|
||
netmail.)
|
||
|
||
What is the terminology I would use to describe a message?
|
||
Header: part containing the From/By, To, Subj/RE, and Status
|
||
lines.
|
||
MSGID: Message Identification. The normal user and sysop doesn't
|
||
really need to worry about this line. They're usually hidden anyway.
|
||
Quote: The portion of the message quoting the message one is
|
||
replying to. Usually 4 lines is sufficient to remind the recipient what
|
||
one was talking about. Usually preceded by >, initials, or **. Most
|
||
offline readers will indent these or place them in different colors,
|
||
with proper configuration of the offline reader or editor.
|
||
Body: The actual message itself.
|
||
Tagline: A funny or political saying, usually short.
|
||
Origin line: Usually the name of the originating board and the
|
||
FIDOnet address in parenthesis. Some editors eliminate the tagline, so
|
||
the origin line doubles as a tagline.
|
||
Path statement: Helps the sysop determine how the message got
|
||
from the originating system to his/her system. Usually, these are
|
||
hidden.
|
||
Seen-bys: Often hidden, these lines show some (but not
|
||
necessarily all) of the nodes seeing the message.
|
||
|
||
ECHOES
|
||
|
||
What are echoes?
|
||
Echoes are also known as conferences or sub areas. There are
|
||
three main types of echoes: local, regional, and national/international.
|
||
Local message bases are only on one or two bbs's in a given area. An example
|
||
would be the (C)omment to the Sysop area on most bbs's. (It should be
|
||
noted that the [C]omment to the Sysop area is a private area, not
|
||
readable by anyone else except the writer and the sysop.) Another type
|
||
of local area might be a User Chat or Forum area. This one is only
|
||
readable by users of that system, and is usually a place where one user
|
||
can leave another user a message. A regional echo
|
||
is an echo that is carried only in one net or region. Many nets have
|
||
echoes for chatting and so forth. Your sysop can point these out to you.
|
||
A national/international echo goes out of the region, and you can find
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 13 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
yourself chatting with someone across the country or in another country.
|
||
|
||
International? Do I need to know another language?
|
||
Most international echoes use the English language as a
|
||
standard language. You could find yourself in trouble posting in a
|
||
foreign language.
|
||
|
||
How are echoes run?
|
||
Each echo has a moderator, or a host/hostess, that sets the tone
|
||
for the participants. Echo rules or guidelines are usually posted
|
||
monthly, or more often. A list of echo moderators is available in a file
|
||
called the ELIST, published monthly. Moderators are generally either the
|
||
originator of a conference, appointed by the originating moderator, or
|
||
elected democratically on the echo.
|
||
|
||
What kinds of rules are common?
|
||
Most moderators seem to use the Golden Rule as an example: do
|
||
(write) unto others as you would have them do (write) unto you. Be nice,
|
||
play fair, no foul language, stay on topic, and don't overquote, are
|
||
those that are common. It is best to wait until you have seen the
|
||
echo's rules/guidelines before you post (write) a message.
|
||
|
||
I see references to Privately Distributed and Backboned Echoes. What's
|
||
the difference?
|
||
A Privately Distributed echo is not as easily available as one
|
||
"on the backbone". It means some sysop is calling another system
|
||
directly to obtain an echo. This could mean higher phone bills! An echo
|
||
"on the backbone" is distributed with over 800 other echoes,
|
||
consolidating the phone bills along the way. That means availability is
|
||
easier.
|
||
|
||
800 echoes???!!!!
|
||
Yes, FIDOnet has over 800 echoes available "on the backbone".
|
||
Chances are that if you have an interest, there is an echo on the
|
||
subject already available. If not, start one! :)
|
||
|
||
My sysop tells me he can't get an echo for me. What do I do now?
|
||
There are a couple of ways to go. If you live in an area
|
||
populated by bbs's, try another board. If your sysop runs the only board
|
||
in town, you may want to try to find out what the trouble is...lack of
|
||
space on the board or in the bbs software, not available from the net's
|
||
mail server, or not on the backbone might mean financial liability for
|
||
the sysop.
|
||
|
||
What happens if I change boards? Will I still get my mail?
|
||
Most BBS software does a search for all mail addressed to your
|
||
name in the echoes that it carries. Therefore, you can get any mail
|
||
addressed to you at any board in the country, providing they carry the
|
||
same echo/es that you post in. This can be handy for those that like to
|
||
travel with a laptop, or visit someone else with a computer and modem.
|
||
Just be sure to always log in using the same derivation/spelling of your
|
||
name. The BBS will not know that Billy and William Jones are the same
|
||
people!
|
||
|
||
What if I don't like a moderator, or the way they're running an echo?
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 14 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
The best thing to do would be to drop the echo. If you're really
|
||
interested, start your own echo with a different tagname. Moderator
|
||
policies vary. It's rather difficult to overthrow or oust a moderator,
|
||
particularly if s/he is the originating or duly elected moderator.
|
||
|
||
OK, so how do I go about starting a new echo?
|
||
Create a new echo by coming up with a tagname for the echo.
|
||
Tagnames are all in capitals with underscores for spaces, usually short.
|
||
Find someone willing to hub the echo and get it started by private
|
||
distribution methods. You'll need a moderator and the echo should be
|
||
elisted. Once you meet the requirements for backboning,
|
||
the moderator/hub may request backbone status for the echo.
|
||
Once all requirements have been met, the echo may be placed on the
|
||
backbone and will be available at the regional mail servers ("Stars").
|
||
Requirements for backbone status change quite often; see your NC/NEC for
|
||
help in determining the most recent requirements.
|
||
|
||
MESSAGE TRAFFIC PARTICULARS
|
||
|
||
What's an address?
|
||
All bbs's in FIDOnet have an address. It is broken down into
|
||
zone: net/node number/point number (opt). For instance, my system is
|
||
1:202/211. Zone 1 signifies North America, 202 is Net202 (much of the
|
||
619 area code, in our case), 211 is my specific "box number" within
|
||
net202. My point's address is 1:202/211.1. That is someone
|
||
running a mailer under me.
|
||
|
||
I see these terms (board, hub, mail server, net, stars). What are they?
|
||
A board...another name for a bbs.
|
||
A hub....larger nets have several boards that act as a hub, in
|
||
much the same way that the airlines use hubs. Our net has 16 hubs, each
|
||
with about 6 to 9 boards under them. There are also regional and zone
|
||
hubs.
|
||
Mail server...some larger nets have one computer dedicated to
|
||
the passing of echo and netmail. It's really nice for those larger nets!
|
||
Net....a net is a small local area within FIDOnet.
|
||
Region....a group of nets in a geographical area.
|
||
Stars...there are six national mail servers within the US. The
|
||
nets mail server or acting mail server machine will contact one star on
|
||
a daily basis.
|
||
Cost-share...most larger nets will share the costs of the phone
|
||
bills from the mail server (or equivalent machine) to the star. Usually,
|
||
all nodes getting backbone echoes will contribute, in a manner similar
|
||
to the way a coffee mess is run in some businesses. (He who drinks the
|
||
coffee helps pay for it.)
|
||
|
||
So how does my message get to its recipient?
|
||
You type your message on your bbs' editor, or prepare it on your offline
|
||
reader. Your offline reader will create a special file which you upload
|
||
to your bbs the next time you call. The bbs will "pack it up"
|
||
and send it to the hub. This may be done immediately or at specific times
|
||
of the day, depending on the sysop. The hub will take the mail, process it,
|
||
pack it up, and send it to the mail server (if there is one). The mail server
|
||
packs all the incoming mail and sends it to the Star. The Stars all
|
||
exchange mail with each other. The Stars then send incoming mail down
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 15 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
the line, to the Mail Servers. The mail servers send to the hubs, who
|
||
send to the various boards under them.
|
||
This is the way that echomail is handled, as well as routed
|
||
netmail. It's similar to the local bus...lots of stops along the way.
|
||
That may account for the occasional message that gets lost..it got off
|
||
at the wrong stop and didn't get back on. :)
|
||
|
||
What is Planet Connect? PageSat?
|
||
In a nutshell (and not technical), these are satellite systems
|
||
capable of sending echomail via satellite instead of using
|
||
the telephone lines. It should be noted that routed netmail does NOT go
|
||
via satellite - it still goes through landlines.
|
||
|
||
NETMAIL
|
||
|
||
What is netmail? How does it differ from echomail?
|
||
Netmail is a personal message. If you want to send someone a
|
||
message that you don't want everyone else to read, send it netmail if
|
||
you can. If echomail is the party line of years past, netmail is the
|
||
private lines of today.
|
||
However, "personal" can be misleading. Depending on how the
|
||
netmail is sent, more than just the sender and receiver could read this
|
||
message. If absolute privacy is necessary, send it snailmail!
|
||
Netmail is NOT for commercial messages, conferences, mailing
|
||
lists (Internet), newsgroups, file attaches, encoded files, pyramid
|
||
letters, or chain letters. Its purpose is for Personal Messages only.
|
||
|
||
How do I access netmail?
|
||
If you are a BBS user, you may want to discuss netmail
|
||
privileges with your sysop. Since netmail often costs money, you may
|
||
have to be a subscriber of a system, or offer a few dollars donation in
|
||
exchange for the privilege. It may be called Matrix Mail.
|
||
|
||
How does netmail get sent?
|
||
There are three ways to send netmail. One is Direct. Your BBS
|
||
calls the recipients' bbs directly. This adds to a phone bills if the
|
||
phone call is a toll call. That's why you may need to pay money for the
|
||
privilege!
|
||
A second way is Semi-Direct. Your netmail may go from your bbs
|
||
to a receiving bbs, such as the recipient bbs's hub or NC.
|
||
A third way is Routed Netmail. Your netmail gets attached to the
|
||
echomail and stops a lot of places along the way. Important netmail
|
||
should *not* get routed.
|
||
|
||
Why does my sysop allow me to receive netmail, but not send a reply? OR
|
||
Why don't I get incoming netmail?
|
||
These are problems to discuss with your sysop. Your sysop should
|
||
be able to forward incoming netmail to you in another forum, if the bbs
|
||
software does not allow users to receive mail in the netmail area.
|
||
Outgoing netmail may cost your sysop some money. (See "How do I access
|
||
netmail?")
|
||
|
||
SPECIAL TERMINOLOGY
|
||
|
||
What is a freq?
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 16 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
"Freq" is an abbreviation for File Request. To aid in exchanging
|
||
files, a sysop with a mailer may access another sysop's files without
|
||
logging on to the bbs and going through the download motions. This saves
|
||
time, and ultimately, phone bills. If you wish to ask your sysop to
|
||
"freq" a file for you, be sure to have the full name of the file you
|
||
want (including proper extension), and the system's FIDO address that
|
||
has the file, including zone:net/node number.
|
||
|
||
What is a mailer?
|
||
Have you ever had to log on to a BBS and "Press Escape to Access
|
||
BBS"? If so, you are going around the mailer. It's like knocking on the
|
||
front door...and as a matter of fact, a popular mailer is *called* "Front
|
||
Door"! Other popular mailers are Binkley and Intermail. The mailer is in
|
||
charge of answering the modem when it rings, and supervises the chores
|
||
of packing and tossing mail, and maintaining the message base. Few
|
||
mailers run by themselves...most need a driver, a message tosser (such
|
||
as GEcho, Squish, FMail), a maintenance utility, and a nice long file
|
||
called a nodelist.
|
||
|
||
What's a nodelist?
|
||
It is a listing of all the nodes in FIDOnet. At full length,
|
||
with 6 zones and around 25,000 nodes, it takes up a lot of disk space.
|
||
It's like a big phone book!
|
||
|
||
What's a point?
|
||
It's an offshoot of a bbs. Most points are either someone that
|
||
really* likes echomail, or someone about ready to set up a BBS and
|
||
needs a place to solve the problems before getting their own node
|
||
number.
|
||
A point either uses mailer software that's specifically for
|
||
points, such as EZPoint or PPoint, or sets up like a bbs. It depends on
|
||
the point sysop's intentions and patience.
|
||
|
||
What does "crashmailable" mean?
|
||
The bbs can receive netmail or echomail at any time of the day.
|
||
CM really stands for "continuous mail", but most folks use the term
|
||
"crash".
|
||
|
||
What does "mail only" mean?
|
||
That's a system that is set up with a mailer and the software
|
||
required to make it run, but does not have a BBS under it. Only another
|
||
mailer can call an MO system. A human using telecommunications software
|
||
will be rejected. Some MO systems are crashmailable, others are not.
|
||
|
||
What's "ZMH"?
|
||
That's Zone Mail Hour, a one hour period of the day where all
|
||
FIDOnet nodes are up and capable of receiving netmail. Normally, BBS
|
||
nodes do not accept callers during ZMH. Zone 1 ZMH is from 4 am - 5 am
|
||
EST.
|
||
|
||
What is a "private node"?
|
||
This is a node that is set up for the operator's convenience. It
|
||
is up to the NC of a net whether the reason for the request for private
|
||
node is a valid one. Normally, private nodes are for extenuating
|
||
circumstances only.
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 17 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
What's a "file distribution network/FDN/filebone?"
|
||
In order to get shareware/public domain software out to the
|
||
public quickly, there is a backbone method of sending files around.
|
||
There are various FDN's. Ask your sysop for further information.
|
||
|
||
FIDOnet STRUCTURE
|
||
|
||
What is the FIDOnet chain of command?
|
||
At the bottom of the heap, there is USER. Users are the reason
|
||
behind echomail, but users have no say in things. (If one wants to be
|
||
technical, users do not exist in FIDOnet policy. But we all know that
|
||
users do! That's why we have BBS's.)
|
||
Next highest is SYSOP. It is s/he to whom the "lowly" user may
|
||
complain. Sysops with a node number are worth one vote in any policy
|
||
that may be voted upon (if any). Hubs count the same as sysops unless
|
||
they hold an office. (It should be noted that most voting takes place
|
||
within each net. If Fido ever gets around to voting on a new Policy to
|
||
replace Policy 4, the actual nodes won't do the voting on that - it will
|
||
be done similar to Congress voting on our new laws: contact your NC to
|
||
state your opinion, but your NC will do the voting.)
|
||
Up from there is the NC, Net Coordinator. This person is
|
||
responsible for seeing that all the sysops conduct themselves in a
|
||
manner becoming to FIDOnet, and to take action upon any that don't. This
|
||
person is responsible for maintaining the net's nodelist and making
|
||
corrections/additions/deletions as necessary.
|
||
The NC is assisted by the NEC, Net Echomail Coordinator. This
|
||
person is responsible for the echomail coming in and out and to ensure
|
||
that the sysops/hubs are acting properly with echomail distribution.
|
||
NC's usually refer all echomail problems to the NEC. (Technically, NEC's
|
||
-and REC's- jobs aren't really discussed in FidoNet policy. However, like
|
||
users, we all know they exist. The job of the NC would be too big for
|
||
most nets to handle by themselves without the NEC.)
|
||
Over the NC and NEC are the RC and RECs, Regional Coordinator
|
||
and Regional Echomail Coordinator. These jobs are detailed in Policy 4,
|
||
but suffice it to say that they are "de bosses" of the NCs and NECs in
|
||
their region.
|
||
At the top are the ZC and the ZEC. The ZC is the Zone
|
||
Coordinator and the ZEC is the Zone Echomail Coordinator for each zone.
|
||
Their responsibilities are detailed in Policy
|
||
4, too. "Dems duh big bosses", folks.
|
||
There is also an IC, International Coordinator, but this person
|
||
has no EC counterpart. This is the person that oversees the whole thing.
|
||
For the names and FidoNet addresses of these personnel, ask your
|
||
sysop for the most recent information.
|
||
|
||
Where do moderators fit into this chain?
|
||
Mmm, excellent question. Policy 4 doesn't really cover moderators.
|
||
However, in the past, it depends a lot on what the problem is.
|
||
If they're posting a policy complaint, they have to be a sysop
|
||
or above. If it's a matter concerning their echo and not a policy
|
||
complaint, then they have other ways to take care of the problem.
|
||
If you're complaining about a moderator, there's no real answer.
|
||
It is difficult to remove an originating or duly elected moderator.
|
||
Sometimes it is best just to leave the echo, and start your own if
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 18 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
you're so inclined.
|
||
|
||
AND, IN SHORT....
|
||
|
||
This is quite a lot of information to read and understand. Please feel
|
||
free to print it out, to learn in smaller chunks.
|
||
|
||
If you are a sysop or moderator, please feel free to disseminate this
|
||
information as it reads. If you are a user, please feel free to pass
|
||
this file to other users or bbs's. Please leave the file intact. All
|
||
corrections and updates should be sent to the author via netmail
|
||
(address below). This file can also be freq'ed from 1:202/701 or
|
||
1:202/711, Pacific Rim Information, San Diego, CA, anytime except ZMH,
|
||
under the file name FIDOFAQ.ZIP.
|
||
|
||
Donna Ransdell
|
||
1:202/211
|
||
The Education Station, MO
|
||
Moderator/Echo Mom, PARENTS
|
||
Co-Mod,CONSUMER_REPORT
|
||
Co-Mod,SEW_&_QUILT
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonet and Politics
|
||
Part 1 of ?
|
||
By Patrick Driscoll
|
||
|
||
Pardon me if I sound like I am rambling in this letter, but I
|
||
couldn't find a better way to say what I have to say.
|
||
|
||
As with any organization, politics seem to creap into Fidonet more
|
||
and more. Here in Region 18, it seems extremly hard to keep the politics
|
||
down to a lower level and the hobby aspects of running a BBS up at a
|
||
higher level. We are presently involved with elections for Regional
|
||
Coordinator in R18, and this is simply some observations from the time
|
||
span from last election till now.
|
||
|
||
Our last election was more than a little messy, with sides taken
|
||
early on and flames and anti-canidate rumors flying in all directions.
|
||
You would have thought the office open was for the Republican nomination
|
||
for president and not for the Regional Coordinator of a HOBBY echomail
|
||
system. After the smoke cleared, Clif Bright was the winner. You would
|
||
think that things would settle down and get back to normal. Wrong! Now
|
||
you had the "Clif Bright" people, and "Clif Bright must go!" people.
|
||
When Clif had some personal problems that caused him to let his duties
|
||
slide for a while, the dogs attacked. None of them asked to help or what
|
||
they could do to help, all I heard was "Clif must go!" Clif survived
|
||
that attack and is now running again. Why, I don't have a clue. After
|
||
some of the attacks he weathered, I would have said "keep your little
|
||
club...I'm outta here."
|
||
|
||
One of the tenets of R18POL, the policy that defines Region 18 is
|
||
that all nets in Region 18 should have a written policy on file with the
|
||
RC on how a successor for NC and NEC are chosen, when they are chosen,
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 19 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
who chooses them, ect...you get the point. After talking with Clif, I
|
||
brooched the subject with the local net. Boy, that was a bag of hornets.
|
||
The NC of 372, Dan Folk, has done a great job for the net, and I want
|
||
to see him continue to be NC as long as he wants. My main concern was
|
||
what would happen if he suddenly quit or something worse happened, who
|
||
would take over? The 'Old Guard" put up a hell of a fight, saying the
|
||
following;
|
||
|
||
1) We don't need a written policy. Any questions can be decided by us
|
||
(the Old Guard) later.
|
||
2) NC should not be voted on position. The present NC should appoint a
|
||
replacement.
|
||
3) To be NC you have to have been NC of another large net to qualify to
|
||
be NC.
|
||
4) The present NEC should become NC and appoint another NEC.
|
||
5) Maybe if we just got rid of Patrick Driscoll, this issue will go
|
||
away.
|
||
|
||
To Dan Folks' credit, he did write up a rough draft of a local
|
||
policy and did post it in the local sysop conference. It called for, if
|
||
I remember right, an election to replace the NC when the NC quits, and
|
||
that the NC appoints the NEC. That was as far as it got...the rough
|
||
draft. It just kinda died out. The queries to whatever happened to it
|
||
have remained unanswered.
|
||
|
||
VERY political, if you ask me. We have a NEC who wants to be NC so
|
||
bad he can taste it, and a group of the 'Old Guard' who wish to control
|
||
the net as much as possible, without some upstart shaking the boat, and
|
||
a shrinking membership, not just in the local 372 net, but in all of
|
||
Fidonet. The main reason is the Internets' growth in popularity. That
|
||
doesn't explain all of Fidonets problems, though. A great part of it is
|
||
the politics involved in this network. You have NC's who have been NC
|
||
since the dawn of time, and you either 'play by my rules or I'll kick
|
||
you out of the sandbox'. You have systems that have no morals or ethics
|
||
...that will do whatever it takes to get a node removed from the
|
||
nodelist, including lawsuits and straight-forward forgery of netmail
|
||
messages. You have a higharchy who sold out the net to services like
|
||
Planet Connect, ect.. You have RCs and ZCs with no backbone, and are
|
||
willing to compromise the future of the net to maintain their profit
|
||
margin.
|
||
|
||
Over the past year or so I have read in the Snooze about nets that
|
||
kick systems out because they won't 'play by our rules' or that rock the
|
||
boat too much. I have read about whole nets disolved for no reason,
|
||
other than a sysop with friends in high places didn't win an election.
|
||
The requests to be relisted by the affected systems have fallen on deaf
|
||
ears. I have read about the powers that be relisting systems because of
|
||
threats of lawsuits, systems that really should have been removed for
|
||
good. I have seen moderator fights between the moderator of support
|
||
areas against the author of the software who holds the copyright to the
|
||
software name, and the conference win due to nothing more than 'who the
|
||
moderator knows'. Strictly politics, nothing more. We are losing good
|
||
support areas run by the author's of the of the software because of some
|
||
small minded moderators and Z*'s who decide to run competing conferences
|
||
with blatent copyright violations by using the software name that
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 20 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
belongs to the author. The conference that comes to mind is the TRIBBS_
|
||
SUPPORT conference, and the official Tribbs support conference that Mark
|
||
Goodwin, the author of TriBBS, ran. If I was to try and start a FidoNews
|
||
support conference where I made all the rules, I would be run out on a
|
||
rail. If I was a friend of the 'powers that be', I might actually be
|
||
allowed to start the area and get support when the Snooze people came
|
||
after me.
|
||
|
||
If we remove the 'for-profit' Cost recovery Programs (CRP's) we
|
||
will get even more systems interested. Nothing is more disgusting than
|
||
contacting a NEC who feeds mail and files and be told that it'll cost
|
||
$50.00 a month for a full feed, when you know that he has 25 systems
|
||
already paying $50.00 a month for the service. The cost to him to run
|
||
the mail/file feeds, under $75.00 a month for the Internet account and
|
||
the feed. A tidy profit of over $1200.00 a month. The idea of a for
|
||
profit CRP goes against all that Fidonet stands for, we might as well
|
||
just change the name to Fido-pay-me-house-payment-net. This does more
|
||
harm to the net then you think. If the net allows it's structure to
|
||
operate 'for profit', Fidonet becomes a 'for profit' business, with the
|
||
legal liabilities of a 'for profit' business.
|
||
|
||
In conclusion, if we get the politics out of the net, the net will
|
||
prosper. The *C and *EC higharchy should get back to the roots of the
|
||
net and help the net prosper, not to just see how much power/money/
|
||
friends they can get by using their positions to advantage the few while
|
||
ignoring the many. Don't get me wrong, there are many NC's doing a great
|
||
job, but the few bad NCs make the whole net look bad. If we, as a net,
|
||
call for local NC/NEC elections every 2 years, with any nodelisted sysop
|
||
in that net, allowed to run for office, the net will be a better place
|
||
for all systems. If we require the same rules for RC/REC and ZC/ZEC
|
||
positions, the net will be even better. If all local nets were to have
|
||
written policies in effect that cover the issues of NC/NEC replacement,
|
||
Fidonet will be less confusing to newbie systems. Bring back a real CRP,
|
||
civil people and the 'hobby' of the net, it will be a better place. With
|
||
the new Telecommunications Act of 1996, this may all become a mote issue.
|
||
If the law is upheld, none of the United States sysops will be able to
|
||
afford the liablity of running a system that has echomail.
|
||
|
||
Any flames, death threats,ect. welcome,
|
||
Pat
|
||
1:372/19
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Vern Faulkner <Vern.Faulkner@f44.n340.z1.fidonet.org>
|
||
FIDONEWS SUBMISSION
|
||
|
||
I read with some interest a little while ago about the fact that
|
||
fido is dead, (Internet killed the FidoNet Star) and that internet
|
||
is taking over.
|
||
|
||
It is, in fact the truth. This article will be relayed via
|
||
internet, although I have a fidonet account. Why? Because netmail is
|
||
unreliable for whatever reasons - and has been for some time. That's
|
||
just the way it is.
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 21 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
What has killed FIDOnet? Well, look back through the articles
|
||
awhile, and see how many of them do _not_ have someone arguing about
|
||
some power-mad moderator or *C doing something vile.
|
||
|
||
I've been there myself - an argument with the NEC over unregistred
|
||
software being used for a year, and serious questions about the amount
|
||
of money being made by the CRP, and how much of that is actually
|
||
requried to pay the bills. Same old stuff, really.
|
||
|
||
I'm just another grunt sysop, been here for about five years. I
|
||
still have a FIDO address - but lets look at the reasons why. I don't
|
||
carry backbone echomail anymore, because I am making a statement by
|
||
not contributing to the CRP until the NEC installs budgeting software
|
||
and declares their bills so that we, the grunt sysops, know how much
|
||
of our money is going where. Until then, no deal. So, in short, no
|
||
mail because of dumb fido politics.
|
||
|
||
I don't send netmail, unless CRASH, because it doesn't get where
|
||
it is supposed to. I do, however, send gated material through the
|
||
internet. Internet bounces bad mail. If you don't get mail back, it
|
||
got to where it went to.
|
||
|
||
In short, I am not 1:340/44, but more the person at the end of
|
||
vern.faulkner@f44.n340.z1.fidonet.org. I have mail gated by a local
|
||
provider who holds the MX records for my node. I can guarantee you
|
||
that wherever you are in the world, you can send mail to the internet
|
||
side of things (even though it is the same physical location as
|
||
1:340/44.0) and it will get through. Can't say the same for FIDOnet.
|
||
|
||
Then I think back to some of the crap I've run into over the
|
||
years. One of my fondest moments was watching Bruce Bodger having a
|
||
power-fit over RA_SUPPORT and banning taglines. 72 characters,
|
||
archived, each message, was somehow bad for us. Even more fun was the
|
||
moderator of one of the abuse-support echos who despite a policy of
|
||
no abuse in the echo, was one of the most insulting people I have ever
|
||
encountered in echomail.
|
||
|
||
I ponder the year and a half that I co-moderated an echo with a
|
||
chap from Texas. Pretty basic stuff - save that I used to send a lot
|
||
of my "don't do this" and "here's the guidelines, don't do anything
|
||
naughty again" stuff by NETmail. Half the sysops at the other end, it
|
||
would seem, didn't even allow their users access to NETmail.
|
||
|
||
And funny - despite that the most common whine I see around here
|
||
is about power-mad moderators, the basic truth is that as a moderator
|
||
I didn't *have* any power. I couldn't really stop anyone from posting
|
||
a rant about any topic they chose.
|
||
|
||
But on the flipside, the whole thing about P4 (which isn't a valid
|
||
document anyhow, as it wasn't ratified by P3 rules) is that it gives
|
||
far too much range to the general truism of human society - people
|
||
with lousy motives will often gravitate to positions of power. Which
|
||
is why the *C positions of the nets are so full of power-grubbing
|
||
madmen (and madwomen!) which gain far more notice than the people that
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 22 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
actually do the job of *C for altruistic reasons.
|
||
|
||
Typical situation here - the NEC won't run budgeting software to
|
||
show where the money goes. Maybe he's fleecing us. Maybe he isn't.
|
||
Until something happens and a change of ways comes along, (such as a
|
||
policy that says NEC's have to be accountable with the CRP finances to
|
||
the general populace) situations such as this *can* develop. Some CRPs
|
||
will be run sensibly. Some won't. More political crap.
|
||
|
||
With an internet provider, one simply pays one's money, and takes
|
||
one's chance. Because money is involved, _and there are alternatives_,
|
||
if there is a problem with one source to the net, one can always take
|
||
one's money to another provider.
|
||
|
||
FIDO politics doesn't give one that option. If I have a feud with
|
||
a local *C, there isn't another alternative I can find to get a
|
||
connection re-established. The idea behind it is good, but in the end,
|
||
its bad. Too much power.
|
||
|
||
But FIDO *IS* dying. I use FTN technology to send my local BBS
|
||
mail to 'points' (one whom is a FIDO node, the other an internet
|
||
node - kind of symbolic, really) in the area, and that and the
|
||
internet address through the MX records is the ONLY reason I am in
|
||
FIDO. A few local chaps are interesting, the rest... not worth my
|
||
effort.
|
||
|
||
FIDO will change, or die. End of story. Either people wise up and
|
||
realize that the geographical tyranny that characterizes FIDO must by
|
||
logic end, or the concept of FIDO will die. There are 'FIDO' systems
|
||
on the internet here in Victoria, off in Texas, Ohio, and the like.
|
||
They are, by FIDO rules, within reach of each other, and ought to be
|
||
in the same net! Obviously, P4 is a peice of trash, along with the
|
||
outdated political power-structure embodied within it.
|
||
|
||
I might move far away from my current location, and put up a
|
||
system with an internet connection (through OS/2 utilities) and ask to
|
||
be re-instated to my old net. After all, who gives a rip about ZMH
|
||
anymore? Most everyone runs CM mail anyhow, the nodelist is a complete
|
||
technical joke, and most of the people at the top don't yet realize
|
||
that their mis-management of the net is causing the very demise of
|
||
their own feeble powerbase anyhow. Congratulations to the FidoGawds,
|
||
for they are the masters of a crumbling domain that is falling apart
|
||
to the power of market ecomony and personal will. Fido won't be here
|
||
in two years, not in any real sense....
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Fidonews Information
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 23 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
------- FIDONEWS MASTHEAD AND CONTACT INFORMATION ----------------
|
||
|
||
Editor: Donald Tees
|
||
Editors Emeritii: Thom Henderson, Dale Lovell,
|
||
Vince Perriello, Tim Pozar
|
||
Tom Jennings, Sylvia Maxwell
|
||
"FidoNews" BBS
|
||
FidoNet 1:1/23
|
||
BBS +1-519-570-4176, 300/1200/2400/14400/V.32bis/HST(DS)
|
||
|
||
more addresses:
|
||
Don -- 1:221/192, don@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca
|
||
|
||
(Postal Service mailing address)
|
||
FidoNews
|
||
154 Victoria St. S.
|
||
Kitchener, Ontario
|
||
Canada
|
||
N2H 2b5
|
||
|
||
voice: (519) 570-4899
|
||
|
||
Fidonews is published weekly by and for the members of the FIDONET
|
||
INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR ELECTRONIC MAIL system. It is a compilation
|
||
of individual articles contributed by their authors or their
|
||
authorized agents. The contribution of articles to this compilation
|
||
does not diminish the rights of the authors. Opinions expressed in
|
||
these articles are those of the authors and not necessarily those of
|
||
FidoNews.
|
||
|
||
Authors retain copyright on individual works; otherwise FidoNews is
|
||
Copyright 1996 Donald Tees. All rights reserved. Duplication
|
||
and/or distribution permitted for noncommercial purposes only. For use
|
||
in other circumstances, please contact the original authors, or the eds.
|
||
|
||
OBTAINING COPIES: The most recent issue of FidoNews in electronic
|
||
form may be obtained from the FidoNews BBS via manual download or
|
||
Wazoo FileRequest, or from various sites in the FidoNet and Internet.
|
||
PRINTED COPIES may be obtained by sending SASE to the above paper-mail
|
||
address.
|
||
|
||
INTERNET USERS: FidoNews is available via FTP from ftp.fidonet.org,
|
||
in directory ~ftp/pub/fidonet/fidonews.
|
||
|
||
Anyone interested in getting a copy of the INTERNET GATEWAY FAQ may
|
||
freq GISFAQ.ZIP from 1:133/411.0, or send an internet message to
|
||
fidofaq@gisatl.fidonet.org. No message or text or subject is
|
||
necessary. The address is a keyword that will trigger the automated
|
||
response. People wishing to send inquiries directly to David Deitch
|
||
should now mail to fidonet@gisatl.fidonet.org rather than the
|
||
previously listed address.
|
||
|
||
SUBMISSIONS: You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
|
||
FidoNews. Article submission requirements are contained in the file
|
||
FidoNews 13-09 Page: 24 26 Feb 1996
|
||
|
||
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from the FidoNews BBS, or Wazoo filerequestable
|
||
from 1:1/23 as file "ARTSPEC.DOC". Please read it.
|
||
|
||
"Fido", "FidoNet" and the dog-with-diskette are U.S. registered
|
||
trademarks of Tom Jennings, and are used with permission.
|
||
|
||
' ' disgreement is actually necessary,
|
||
or we'd all have to get in fights
|
||
or semethin to amuse ourselves,,
|
||
and create the requisite chaos."
|
||
-Tom Jennings
|
||
-- END
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|