1737 lines
72 KiB
Plaintext
1737 lines
72 KiB
Plaintext
Volume 6, Number 32 7 August 1989
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| _ |
|
||
| / \ |
|
||
| /|oo \ |
|
||
| - FidoNews - (_| /_) |
|
||
| _`@/_ \ _ |
|
||
| International | | \ \\ |
|
||
| FidoNet Association | (*) | \ )) |
|
||
| Newsletter ______ |__U__| / \// |
|
||
| / FIDO \ _//|| _\ / |
|
||
| (________) (_/(_|(____/ |
|
||
| (jm) |
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
Editor in Chief: Vince Perriello
|
||
Editors Emeritii: Dale Lovell
|
||
Thom Henderson
|
||
Chief Procrastinator Emeritus: Tom Jennings
|
||
|
||
FidoNews is published weekly by the International FidoNet
|
||
Association as its official newsletter. You are encouraged to
|
||
submit articles for publication in FidoNews. Article submission
|
||
standards are contained in the file ARTSPEC.DOC, available from
|
||
node 1:1/1. 1:1/1 is a Continuous Mail system, available for
|
||
network mail 24 hours a day.
|
||
|
||
Copyright 1989 by the International FidoNet Association. All
|
||
rights reserved. Duplication and/or distribution permitted for
|
||
noncommercial purposes only. For use in other circumstances,
|
||
please contact IFNA at (314) 576-4067. IFNA may also be contacted
|
||
at PO Box 41143, St. Louis, MO 63141.
|
||
|
||
Fido and FidoNet are registered trademarks of Tom Jennings of
|
||
Fido Software, 164 Shipley Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94107 and
|
||
are used with permission.
|
||
|
||
We don't necessarily agree with the contents of every article
|
||
published here. Most of these materials are unsolicited. No
|
||
article will be rejected which is properly attributed and legally
|
||
acceptable. We will publish every responsible submission
|
||
received.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
1. ARTICLES ................................................. 1
|
||
How Much GARBAGE should a person put up with? ............ 1
|
||
Moderators BEWARE! ....................................... 8
|
||
2. LATEST VERSIONS .......................................... 10
|
||
Latest Software Versions ................................. 10
|
||
3. NOTICES .................................................. 12
|
||
The Interrupt Stack ...................................... 12
|
||
4. REPORTS .................................................. 13
|
||
Executive Committee Report ............................... 24
|
||
Report from Nominations and Elections Committee .......... 27
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 1 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
ARTICLES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
How Much GARBAGE should a person put up with?
|
||
============================================
|
||
|
||
By: Justin Marquez (1:106/100)
|
||
|
||
I have interpreted the article in FNEWS631 by Phil Buonomo as an
|
||
attack upon my performance in the case of Mike Lester's
|
||
excommunication. This article is my own rebuttal to it.
|
||
|
||
I have refrained from public mention of Mr. Lester's activities
|
||
while he was in Net 170 because I have had no particular desire
|
||
to embarrass him publicly. Since he has seen fit to spread
|
||
untruths about the situation, and to imply that I treated him
|
||
unjustly, I shall now present the story from my perspective.
|
||
|
||
If anyone doubts my veracity, or has any question about how I
|
||
deal with fellow sysops or with NC's (while I was in the RC19
|
||
job), please feel free to contact ANY sysop in Net 106 or ANY NC
|
||
in Region 19 for an independent perspective.
|
||
|
||
I regret the necessity to write this type of FidoNews article. I
|
||
apologize to you in advance. However, Mr. Buonomo and Mr.
|
||
Lester have publicly injured me by impugning my character and I
|
||
do not appreciate it. Unfortunately, FidoNews is the only forum
|
||
available for my reply.
|
||
|
||
It is also regrettably necessary to quote some of his material.
|
||
Sections quoted will be marked at the beginning of each line with
|
||
the vertical bar character, as shown below:
|
||
|
||
| More Tales of Horror from the FidoNet *C's
|
||
| by Phil Buonomo 1:107/583, 7:520/583, 9:807/1
|
||
| (Whew! Made it another week! Guess the RC's don't read
|
||
| FidoNews, else I'd have been tossed out long ago!)
|
||
|
||
No, Phil, the RC's do read POLICY, which is perhaps why you
|
||
haven't been "bounced".
|
||
|
||
|quote from national sysop:
|
||
| RG: Tell me, just how many nodes do you know of that have been
|
||
| RG: excommunicated on the basis of a single offense? Indeed,
|
||
| RG: how many nodes do you know of that have been excommuni-
|
||
| RG: cated, period?
|
||
| end quote
|
||
|
||
Nobody that I know has been excommunicated for a single offense.
|
||
Mike Lester violated POLICY on a number of occasions while he was
|
||
NC170 and after he was removed from that post. His POLICY3
|
||
violations included: - harassment of local nodes whose sysops he
|
||
didn't like, including removal of some of those nodes. (How
|
||
would YOU like to have an NC just lickin' his chops and waitin'
|
||
for your system to be down at ZMH so that you are found in
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 2 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
violation of POLICY?) Don't believe me? Ask sysop Si Hawk. -
|
||
Entering messages with profanity in a public echo - Entering
|
||
messages with personal attacks (flaming) - Harassing voice
|
||
telephone calls to various *C's. The fellow who became the next
|
||
NC got phone calls in the wee hours of the morning. Lovely
|
||
fellows, this Mr. Lester and his friends. (No, it could not be
|
||
*proven* he did it. If it could, there would probably have been
|
||
criminal charges filed.) - Being exceptionally uncooperative in
|
||
any number of ways including: suddenly using AreaFix's add areas
|
||
capability to add 200 echomail areas and convincing a few of his
|
||
friends to do the same; convincing a portion of the net to band
|
||
together with him and form a separate group of "Independent
|
||
Nodes" who were not allowed to communicate with the "regular" Net
|
||
170 nodes; attempting to wrest control of echomail distribution.
|
||
- Revealing contents of private NetMail messages without asking
|
||
permission. (Some of the things in the Fido News #631 article
|
||
fall into this category.) - And, of course, his admitted attempt
|
||
to interfere with the NC's system.
|
||
|
||
I asked him on many occasions to quit his violations of POLICY.
|
||
He *could* have been removed on the basis of MANY violations,
|
||
long before he was finally removed.
|
||
|
||
I freely admit that there was a LOT of "NC-baiting" going on in
|
||
Net 170. I told Mike NOT to fall for it. I tried for MONTHS to
|
||
convince him to quit violating POLICY, just because some folks in
|
||
the local net were pestering him. *C's *must* be willing to put
|
||
up with a lot of garbage. It is part of the job. If one cannot
|
||
stand the heat, one *should* get out of the kitchen. ("Two
|
||
wrongs don't equal one right", plus many other cliches....)
|
||
|
||
After Mike was removed as NC, he was given MANY, MANY chances to
|
||
back off and act responsibly. Only after seeing him deteriorate
|
||
to serious threats to others was he finally removed. Was he then
|
||
removed for ONE violation? No. He was removed for the
|
||
cumulative effects of his many violations and because he was
|
||
totally unrepentant. Had he stayed in FidoNet, it was painfully
|
||
apparent that he would have continued to disrupt net operations
|
||
whenever he could do so. Even now he is still attempting
|
||
(through his spreading of libelous and false information) to
|
||
disrupt Net 170 and Region 19 matters whenever he can do so.
|
||
|
||
| 1) First get the NC(me) to route ALL messages for the local net
|
||
| through your node as NEC.
|
||
|
||
| 2) Then, using a message editor that dont leave footprints (FD
|
||
| editor), make changes to the messages the NC posts locally, and
|
||
| make sure some if not most are a degrading nature in responce
|
||
| to simple questions.
|
||
|
||
| 3) Quietly, forward "copys" to the RC, explaining that you (the
|
||
| NEC) think the NC is "over the edge" and politlely ask what he
|
||
| can do about it. A voice phone call helps here, if your GOOD at
|
||
| manipulating people. A few of your friends making complaints
|
||
| also helps, no matter how bogus they may be. also, if a node
|
||
| wont file an "official" complaint make one up in his name and
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 3 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
| send it in. (eg. Joe Savard. )
|
||
|
||
I have seen few people as good at manipulation of people as is
|
||
Mr. Lester. Curiously enough, during the episodes involving
|
||
Lester, not once do I recall his mentioning that persons might be
|
||
tampering with his messages. The most damaging messages to his
|
||
case were some that he copied me on (in his own dealings with
|
||
local Net 170 sysops) and which came directly from his node to
|
||
mine.
|
||
|
||
| 4) The RC removes the NC for "cause" and appoints the NEC the
|
||
| NEW NC.
|
||
|
||
I removed Mike because he was doing many things that were not
|
||
according to POLICY. Frankly, I never kept many old files or
|
||
messages, because I never planned to publicly put him on "trial".
|
||
Now that he has fired the first volley, so to speak, I will
|
||
present the situation as I saw it (and still do).
|
||
|
||
| 5) Now your in "CONTROL". Next, start having "secret" monthly
|
||
| meetings where not even wifes are allowed in the room where
|
||
| fidonet business is conducted. ( You should have heard some of
|
||
| the wives outside when this happened.)
|
||
|
||
| 6) When the old NC(me) finds out about what happened and the
|
||
| reason why, he just shrugs it off and says ok, "you leave me
|
||
| alone, and I will leave you alone", Now just wait about 2 weeks
|
||
| and be silent.
|
||
|
||
Hmmmmm.... hardly remember him being silent, EVER. If leaving
|
||
MANY profane, flaming messages in your local SYSOP echo is
|
||
"silence", then I guess he was "silent".
|
||
|
||
| 7) Un-rest rules the net, because of the changes that have
|
||
| happened. "Un-rest" is an understatement, it almost instantly
|
||
| polarized the net. Now its time for some "heavy handed rules".
|
||
| ie: You MUST attend the local fidonet meetings. (only heresay)
|
||
| You MUST get all your echos from the NC/NEC. You can only have
|
||
| 40 echos MAX. If you post in the local sysop echo, it must be
|
||
| a message that pertains to ALL. Messages of a one to one
|
||
| nature are NOT allowed. ect... The penaltys are "you WILL be
|
||
| removed from the nodelist" A threat of having NET 170 removed
|
||
| by the RC also comes in, if the nodes do not "Cooperate".
|
||
|
||
My charge as RC included "keeping your Region running smoothly".
|
||
Many of Mike Lester's tactics were designed to extort and to
|
||
control others. This fellow was on the most incredible power
|
||
trip I have ever witnessed. His actions appeared solely designed
|
||
to polarize the net, to cripple the net and spilled over into
|
||
some other FidoNet local nets.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 4 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
| 8) Now, dump on the old NC (me) an echo NOT wanted/requested
|
||
| without warning or even asking to have the area set up. (100+
|
||
| messages) ( I had to manually delete them from my netmail area
|
||
|
||
Interestingly enough, the Net 170 local "operations document"
|
||
which Mr. Lester used required the local sysops to subscribe to
|
||
TWO echo areas, if memory serves correctly. It seems the new NC
|
||
got the idea from the former NC that such was OK. The new NC was
|
||
advised by the RC that "forcefeeding" an echo area was not
|
||
acceptable and he stopped it immediately.
|
||
|
||
| 9) Now comes the part that got ME ex-communicated. When I
|
||
| complain saying to discontinue sending the echo, simply send a
|
||
| message to the sysop (me) stateing "I'M THE NC, and IF YOU WISH
|
||
| TO REMAIN IN FIDONET, YOU WILL RECIEVE THIS ECHO.
|
||
|
||
| 10) When the ex-NC(me) says "ok, fine, you SEND to ME an echo
|
||
| that I dont wish to have, I will place a file on HOLD for you
|
||
| to pick up every time you call. (note: the FILE was my files
|
||
| listing, the one you would get if you requested FILES from my
|
||
| system. Not a mail bomb, or virused program. also, I intended
|
||
| on recieving the echomail to a passthrough area to no one,
|
||
| effectivly deleting the messages.)
|
||
|
||
Considering that this incident followed closely on the heels of
|
||
another, in which a bosom buddy of Lester sent a virus/bomb type
|
||
program to the fellow who was NC between the current NC and
|
||
Lester, it is possible that the NC may have been totally out of
|
||
line in believing that Lester meant to harm the NC's system or
|
||
that he intended to impede mail flow in Net 170. Personally, I
|
||
believe he interpreted the threat correctly. Lester's prior
|
||
behavior and the actions of his cohorts confirm "malice
|
||
aforethought".
|
||
|
||
| 11) The new NC then quietly removes the ex-NC(me) from the
|
||
| nodelist for that week because he is "annoyed". no warning, no
|
||
| nothing was ever sent to me about this.
|
||
|
||
Mike Lester was reinstated while the appeals were going through
|
||
channels. (David Dodell is more than fair when excommunications
|
||
are involved. He is so concerned about the rights of sysops that
|
||
he will even allow the real twits to stay in the nodelist on the
|
||
chance they may turn out to be non-twits.)
|
||
|
||
| 12) When I complain again, pass it along to the RC, who then
|
||
| passes it along to David Dodell, who ultimatly, finds that "No
|
||
| one has done anything outside of policy."
|
||
|
||
| It happened to me, and when final, 15 sysops, left fidonet 170
|
||
| Now its time for a NEW RULE for the local net. Rule: You can't
|
||
| be in fidonet 170 if you allow Mike Lester ex-NC of Fidonet
|
||
| 170 on your system as a user. (Just ask the sysop of
|
||
| 7:771/208.0 if this is true or not.) The bottom line is this,
|
||
| I was ex-communicated from fidonet simply for saying I was
|
||
| going to "put a FILE on hold". The FILE was NEVER sent, since
|
||
| the new NC removed me from the nodelist. He never called back
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 5 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
| either, after I sent him the message I was going to put the
|
||
| file on hold for him. So, I never actually DID anything wrong,
|
||
| but i was ex-communicated for it anyway. I even ASKED the RC
|
||
| for a REGION number, and it was refused, by saying that there
|
||
| was already an existing net in Tulsa, and I HAD to be in it or
|
||
| not at all.
|
||
|
||
Now, why would an RC give an independent regional node number to
|
||
a sysop whose excommunication he had just upheld? Would there
|
||
be any reason to such action?
|
||
|
||
Every local Net has probably had cases where a disgruntled sysop
|
||
wanted to move to Regional Independent status. Even those folks
|
||
who are NOT excommunicated are not moved out of local nets as
|
||
Independents unless there is a valid technical reason.
|
||
(EchoMail star or backbone systems are one possible example of
|
||
valid reasons.)
|
||
|
||
| Mike Lester
|
||
| Galaxy Computer HST
|
||
| Multiline Opus 1.10
|
||
| 7:771/0 (alternet) 1-918-835-8933 (9600 hst)
|
||
| 7:771/1 (alternet)
|
||
| 7:771/2 (alternet) 1-918-836-6336 (1200 hayes)
|
||
| 11:771/0 (OPCN) 1-918-835-8933 (9600 hst)
|
||
| 11:771/1 (OPCN)
|
||
| 11:771/2 (OPCN) 1-918-835-8933 (1200 hayes)
|
||
|
||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
Is this man on a power trip, or what? Anytime you see MANY
|
||
address lines, it basically means this "Lookie here! See what a
|
||
honcho I am?" It is similar to seeing: Dr. Joe Dokes, B.S.,
|
||
M.A., Ph.D., P.E., D.V.M., ad infinitum
|
||
|
||
| So this guy, Mike Lester, gets excommunicated from FidoNet.
|
||
| His network gets so upset they 'vote out' the NC appointed by
|
||
| RC19, who then declares the vote 'illegal' and throws it out.
|
||
| Most of the network then quits FidoNet.
|
||
|
||
POLICY3 (in effect at the time all this happened) did not provide
|
||
for any voting "in" or "out" of anyone, anywhere. Neither does
|
||
it prohibit an RC from allowing a net to choose an NC. It only
|
||
said the RC "appoints the NC's". I suppose an RC could "appoint"
|
||
the person voted for by a majority of the local sysops. We did
|
||
it in Net 106. POLICY does clearly state that an NC must work
|
||
with both the sysops in his net and the RC in his region. In my
|
||
opinion, Lester amply proved he was not willing to do EITHER.
|
||
|
||
It is also my opinion that only nets which are NOT in a state of
|
||
great turmoil should vote for new NC's. You may have a different
|
||
opinion and you are welcome to it. Certainly you can see the
|
||
dangers of allowing nets to vote NC's out, since occasionally an
|
||
NC must make a decision which is both "right" and "unpopular".
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 6 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Oh, yes, don't miss the fact that Mike set up a second node at
|
||
his home, listing his wife as sysop, for the stated purpose of
|
||
having a second vote, just in case the RC decided to let Net 170
|
||
vote on an NC. The NC was reluctant to keep such a node in the
|
||
net, but was advised that as long as it obeyed POLICY
|
||
requirements that it should stay in the list. It stayed until
|
||
she asked to be removed when Mike moved his operations into
|
||
AlterNet.
|
||
|
||
Funny thing, I have yet to see moderators of the EchoMail
|
||
Conferences clamoring to allow subscribers to those areas to vote
|
||
moderators "in" or "out". (I guess they can still "vote with
|
||
their feet".)
|
||
|
||
| So we have another case where an RC 'kills' a network for the
|
||
| 'good' of FidoNet.
|
||
|
||
Net 170 is not now, now was it ever, "dead". What DID die was my
|
||
desire to be an RC anymore. The TWITS won. I certainly "lost"
|
||
something - my zeal to work for FidoNet. The garbage collection
|
||
routine finally overflowed. John Summers is now RC19. In my
|
||
desire not to drag Lester through the communal mud and not spell
|
||
out in public how poorly he had behaved, I set myself up for a
|
||
barrage of lies, such as the ones that Phil has obviously bought.
|
||
|
||
If Lester had not been on such a power trip, then there would
|
||
have been NO PROBLEM. He *caused* the original problems by
|
||
continuing to violate POLICY. He perpetuated the problems in his
|
||
attempts to disrupt the mail and echomail in Net 170.
|
||
|
||
Let the record show: Mike Lester was the only NC I ever removed
|
||
for any reason other than non-response to calls during ZMH for
|
||
over a week at a time.
|
||
|
||
| Are you starting to see the danger of living under Policy4 now?
|
||
|
||
Curious statement. All this happened under POLICY3. What I AM
|
||
beginning to see is the folly in assuming people would not listen
|
||
to lies upon lies.
|
||
|
||
| This story would be bad enough, but now we learn that after
|
||
| these guys join AlterNet, the FidoNet NC and RC start trying to
|
||
| take over the echomail conferences the 'excommunicated' nodes
|
||
| are contributing to! Funny thing is, I thought that FidoNet
|
||
| echomail policy stated that conferences belonged to the
|
||
| MODERATORS!
|
||
|
||
Frankly, I don't know WHO "owns" the echomail conferences. I
|
||
*do* know that the moderators do not bear the full COSTS to
|
||
distribute the conferences. Once you ask someone to dedicate
|
||
some portion of his resources to support YOUR power trip, you
|
||
give up part of that power to control.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 7 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
I am quite tired of seeing people flaunt POLICY, make life
|
||
miserable for many other people, finally get excommunicated, join
|
||
Yet_Another_Net and continue to reap whatever "benefits" there
|
||
are to FidoNet membership by collecting EchoMail conveniently
|
||
elsewhere. Are there to be no consequences for such behavior as
|
||
Mr. Lester's? Is there to be no accountability at all?
|
||
|
||
We *ALL* get a partially free ride here, folks. The least we can
|
||
do is to follow some semblance of the established rules. If you
|
||
don't *LIKE* the rules, then you may:
|
||
|
||
- Work to CHANGE the rules while following the
|
||
current rules.
|
||
|
||
*OR*
|
||
|
||
- Vote with your feet.
|
||
|
||
| Well, as a moderator of a number of conferences, I give a
|
||
| warning to any *C that might feel bound to keep ANYONE
|
||
| following MY rules in ANY of MY conferences from posting:
|
||
|
||
| KEEP YOUR DAMN HANDS OFF MY CONFERENCES, OR YOU'LL FIND
|
||
| YOURSELF THE SUBJECT OF A POLICY COMPLAINT SO FAST IT'LL MAKE
|
||
| YOUR HEAD SWIM!
|
||
|
||
Vweeeet! Vweeeet! Vweeeeet!
|
||
POWER TRIP ALERT! POWER TRIP ALERT!
|
||
|
||
" The system has detected another POWER TRIP. Please turn
|
||
off the necessary EchoMail Conferences to reduce the
|
||
noise to a bearable level....."
|
||
|
||
| Clear enough? Good.
|
||
|
||
XTAL Clear, Phil. Please forward a list of "YOUR" conferences to
|
||
me at 1:106/100 and I promise you, I'll not bother you with my
|
||
presence in "YOUR" areas. Now, I assume that by referring to
|
||
them as "YOUR" areas, that means you don't freeload on the rest
|
||
of us by using the public backbone distribution system to deliver
|
||
"YOUR" areas? You ARE talking about areas that nobody else
|
||
spends any of "THEIR" money to distribute, right?
|
||
|
||
Say, Phil.... how would you like it if the backbone system
|
||
suddenly decided to REALLY keep it's hands off "YOUR" areas? I
|
||
know I wouldn't miss 'em.....
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 8 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Moderators BEWARE!
|
||
|
||
The conference you run may NOT be your own!
|
||
|
||
by Phil Buonomo 1:107/583, 7:520/583, 9:807/1
|
||
(Yup, still here! I TOLD you the RC's must not
|
||
read FidoNews!)
|
||
|
||
This past week I've received a LOT of mail. Much of it HATE mail
|
||
from Bruce Bodger's network, and a lot of it 'thanks for letting
|
||
everyone know' mail from those that were alienated.
|
||
|
||
Doesn't bother me, I've received hate mail before, and I'll
|
||
probably do so again. Since the hate mail is so systematic, I
|
||
can only assume it is a coordinated effort.
|
||
|
||
Most hate-mail people were complaining that I hadn't 'researched'
|
||
the facts before writing my article, but the fact is, I did. The
|
||
thrust of it remains that *C's are trying to say who can or
|
||
cannot post in conferences, despite what the moderators rule.
|
||
This is just plain wrong. If an 'excommunicated' sysop signs on
|
||
as a user on another FidoNet sysop's board and enters a valid,
|
||
on-topic message in a conference? The *C's will KILL it.
|
||
|
||
Witness:
|
||
|
||
Date: Tue 25 Jul 89 11:53
|
||
From: Jim Dunmyer
|
||
To: Jim Grubs
|
||
Subj: <<blush>>
|
||
|
||
* Forwarded from 1:234/100, EchoMaster, Temperance MI
|
||
* Originally to Jim Grubs, 1:234/1
|
||
* Forwarded by Jim Grubs, 1:234/1, 11:53 7/25
|
||
|
||
Well, I pulled a good one again!
|
||
|
||
This thing aborted in the middle of the mail transfer this AM,
|
||
and after polling Snyder for the rest of the packet, I discovered
|
||
a problem here.
|
||
|
||
During the recent fiasco, I "fixed" things to cover my ass and
|
||
make certain that any messages you entered into echomail would
|
||
not go through here. I was copying your incoming file to another
|
||
subdirectory, then deleting it from the "normal" one before
|
||
running CONFMAIL IMPORT. Unfortunately, I just discovered the
|
||
problem this AM and corrected it. I moved all the files I had
|
||
into the proper area before processing, so *most* of your stuff
|
||
should now be going out into the echos. Hopefully, I didn't
|
||
loose too much.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 9 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jim, I am truly sorry about this!
|
||
|
||
END OF MSG
|
||
|
||
Now, here we have a case of an echomail coordinator BLATANTLY
|
||
chopping someone's messages, and then BOASTING of it?
|
||
|
||
Perhaps the *C's feel they are above POLICY, now?
|
||
|
||
Where will this crap ever end, people? Don't the rights of the
|
||
individual mean anything anymore? What if Grubs were a user on
|
||
another system? His message wouldn't be ALLOWED to go out
|
||
because he USED to be in FidoNet?
|
||
|
||
Dammit, everytime I see stuff like this I get riled up. Let's
|
||
say it one more time:
|
||
|
||
CONFERENCES BELONG TO THE MODERATOR, NOT THE BACKBONE, NOT THE
|
||
*C'S.
|
||
|
||
Now, while I say this, I am not trying to imply the backbone
|
||
nodes of violating that principle. They supported the "Moderator
|
||
as God" idea at last year's FidoCon, and I believe they have
|
||
supported it in the past year. AND, if the backbone nodes wish
|
||
to set up a set of rules conferences must follow to BE on the
|
||
backbone (having a moderator is one), I support that decision
|
||
wholeheartedly. The backbone nodes are THEIR systems, after all.
|
||
|
||
So here's the musical question, folks:
|
||
|
||
If the BACKBONE does not presume to 'dictate' (good choice of
|
||
words, don't you think) to the moderators, why should the *C's
|
||
feel they can?
|
||
|
||
Perhaps for the same reasons they felt they could 'dictate' to
|
||
Vince and FidoNews...
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 10 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
LATEST VERSIONS
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
Latest Software Versions
|
||
|
||
MS-DOS Systems
|
||
--------------
|
||
|
||
Bulletin Board Software
|
||
Name Version Name Version Name Version
|
||
|
||
Fido 12n+* Phoenix 1.3 TBBS 2.1
|
||
Lynx 1.30 QuickBBS 2.03 TComm/TCommNet 3.4
|
||
Opus 1.03b+ RBBS 17.2A TPBoard 5.2
|
||
|
||
|
||
Network Node List Other
|
||
Mailers Version Utilities Version Utilities Version
|
||
|
||
BinkleyTerm 2.20 EditNL 4.00 ARC 6.02
|
||
D'Bridge 1.21* MakeNL 2.12 ARCmail 2.0
|
||
Dutchie 2.90C ParseList 1.30 ConfMail 4.00
|
||
FrontDoor 2.0 Prune 1.40 EMM 2.02
|
||
PRENM 1.47 XlatList 2.90 GROUP 2.10
|
||
SEAdog 4.51A* XlaxDiff 2.32 LHARC 1.13*
|
||
XlaxNode 2.32 MSG 3.3
|
||
MSGED 1.99
|
||
PK[UN]ZIP 0.92*
|
||
QM 1.0*
|
||
TCOMMail 2.2
|
||
TMail 1.11
|
||
TPBNetEd 3.2
|
||
UFGATE 1.03
|
||
XRS 2.3*
|
||
ZmailQ 1.09*
|
||
|
||
Apple Macintosh
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
|
||
|
||
Name Version Name Version Name Version
|
||
|
||
Red Ryder Host v2.1b3 Tabby 2.0* MacArc 0.03
|
||
Mansion 7.0 ArcMac 1.3
|
||
StuffIt 1.51
|
||
TImport 1.0
|
||
TExport 1.0
|
||
Timestamp 1.6
|
||
Tset 1.0.2
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 11 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Timestart 1.1
|
||
Tally 1.1
|
||
Mehitabel 1.2
|
||
Archie 1.60
|
||
Numberizer 1.5c
|
||
MessageEdit 1.0
|
||
|
||
|
||
Commodore Amiga
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
|
||
|
||
Name Version Name Version Name Version
|
||
|
||
Paragon 1.00+* BinkleyTerm 1.50 ConfMail 1.00
|
||
ChameleonEdit 0.10
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
+ Netmail capable (does not require additional mailer software)
|
||
* Recently changed
|
||
|
||
Utility authors: Please help keep this list up to date by
|
||
reporting new versions to 1:1/1. It is not our intent to list
|
||
all utilities here, only those which verge on necessity.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 12 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
NOTICES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
The Interrupt Stack
|
||
|
||
|
||
24 Aug 1989
|
||
Voyager 2 passes Neptune.
|
||
|
||
24 Aug 1989
|
||
FidoCon '89 starts at the Holiday Inn in San Jose,
|
||
California. Trade show, seminars, etc. Contact 1:1/89
|
||
for info.
|
||
|
||
5 Oct 1989
|
||
20th Anniversary of "Monty Python's Flying Circus"
|
||
|
||
11 Oct 1989
|
||
First International Modula-2 Conference at Bled, Yugoslavia
|
||
hosting Niklaus Wirth and the British Standards Institution.
|
||
Contact 1:106/8422 for more information.
|
||
|
||
11 Nov 1989
|
||
A new area code forms in northern Illinois at 12:01 am.
|
||
Chicago proper will remain area code 312; suburban areas
|
||
formerly served with that code will become area code 708.
|
||
|
||
23 Nov 1989
|
||
26th Anniversary of "Dr. Who" - and still going strong
|
||
|
||
30 Dec 1989
|
||
Telephone area codes (5, 3 and 0) are abolished in Hong Kong
|
||
|
||
If you have something which you would like to see on this
|
||
calendar, please send a message to FidoNet node 1:1/1.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 13 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
REPORTS
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
|
||
MINUTES OF MEETING OF IFNA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
||
|
||
2nd February 1989 10:00 a.m.
|
||
|
||
ATTENDING:
|
||
_________
|
||
|
||
Don Daniels
|
||
Mort Sternheim
|
||
Mark Grennan
|
||
Kris Veitch
|
||
Thom Henderson
|
||
Irene Henderson
|
||
Mark Peters
|
||
Dave Melnick
|
||
Robert Rudolph
|
||
Linda Grennan
|
||
David Drexler
|
||
Courtney Harris
|
||
Ted Polczynski
|
||
|
||
*****************************************************
|
||
|
||
Chairman Pro Tem of meeting Established
|
||
|
||
Reports of Officers
|
||
|
||
1. B. Rudolph
|
||
2. (Don Daniels)
|
||
3. Secretary
|
||
4. Treasurer's Report - read by Mark Grennan
|
||
|
||
January 1989 report & net message of resignation.
|
||
|
||
Item of New Business - Continuing of selling software?
|
||
|
||
B. Rudolph moves to accept Steve Bonine resignation
|
||
and it was seconded. Accept his resignation with
|
||
condition of all required document and/or
|
||
ledgers/records. Carried.
|
||
|
||
5. Report from Secretary - Report read and accepted.
|
||
|
||
6. Ray Gwinn - resigned, no report
|
||
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 14 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
|
||
__________________________
|
||
|
||
1. Executive Committee
|
||
|
||
2. Administrative & Finance
|
||
|
||
3. Nomination & Elections
|
||
|
||
4. By Laws & Rules Committee
|
||
|
||
5. Technical Standards
|
||
|
||
6. Publications
|
||
|
||
7. International Affairs
|
||
|
||
8. Membership Services
|
||
|
||
8a. Membership Data Base
|
||
|
||
|
||
DIVISIONAL REPORTS
|
||
__________________
|
||
|
||
Courtney Harris - Division 10 - Commented that sysops in
|
||
this division feel empathy. Need to improve IFNA image.
|
||
Must stop internal bickering and get something done.
|
||
Report accepted.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Irene Henderson - Division 13 - Letter of Resignation
|
||
from Rick Siegel - Call to administer FidoNet & do something
|
||
constructive. Will is to stay on Publication Committee
|
||
if Board so desires. Report accepted.
|
||
|
||
Mark Peters (alternate) - Division 11 - no report
|
||
|
||
Bill Bolton - Division 12 - not in attendance, no
|
||
report, written or verbal.
|
||
|
||
Ken Kaplan - Division 14 - No report
|
||
|
||
Scott Miller - Division 15 - Not represented.
|
||
|
||
Division 16 - Everything doing fine
|
||
|
||
Division 17 - None
|
||
|
||
Division 18 - None
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 15 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
David Drexler - Division 19 - Sysops are
|
||
dissatisfied, IFNA members are very active and willing
|
||
to work. SW Bell Affair - Houston/San Antonio -
|
||
tariff situation w/BBS - business rates (& explanation
|
||
of the problem). Report accepted.
|
||
|
||
Ethics Committee - Ivan Schaeffel, Chairman
|
||
|
||
M. Grennan submitted document for review and revision -
|
||
no action has been taken. Ivan believes no ethic
|
||
document needed. Mort - suggest document go to
|
||
Executive Committee - maybe item for new business. No
|
||
official report.
|
||
|
||
Public Affairs - David Drexler
|
||
|
||
Set up Fido Con 88 - IFNA; OUTREACH - (Echo name);
|
||
Educating Public - Charitable Organization - Sysoping -
|
||
BBS'ing, etc.
|
||
|
||
A. Public Relation Project - Servicemen letters Tinker
|
||
AFB - including TV interview with KTVY; intend to
|
||
start earlier next year - possibly putting out PR
|
||
list.
|
||
|
||
B. Guideline for donation for handicap sysops.
|
||
(Blind, deaf, etc.)
|
||
|
||
C. "Snail Mail" and office calls
|
||
Greg Trotter - Mail
|
||
David Drexler - Phone Call
|
||
Mark G. - (a) setting up point system with PC
|
||
Users Group; (b) Talking Dog for handicapped
|
||
sysops; (c) Olympic Festival
|
||
|
||
Oklahoma TDD Project - Toshiba 1000 and modem - "large
|
||
screen TDD". Report concluded. Report accepted and
|
||
seconded.
|
||
|
||
Don Daniels, Acting Chair - Bylaws election - Information Report
|
||
|
||
Report from: Curtis Stebbins, CPA
|
||
|
||
Postage:
|
||
43 Foreign $ 56.76
|
||
12 Canada 14.16
|
||
196 USA 205.80
|
||
205 Return Envelopes 51.25
|
||
|
||
Handling Charge 32.34
|
||
Duplication Costs 431.25
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 16 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Envelopes 40.00
|
||
|
||
Professional 618.00
|
||
----------
|
||
|
||
$ 1,449.46
|
||
|
||
|
||
Acting Chairman recommends to pay above bill. Don reports on
|
||
problems of bylaws election - written report - verbal
|
||
also given.
|
||
|
||
66 Ballots received & Counted
|
||
72 Total received
|
||
5 Complaints received on Foreign ballots not arriving on time
|
||
|
||
Courtney Harris, in reference to the results on election moved
|
||
to accept results. Seconded by Dave Melnick. Amends - election
|
||
results be accepted procedurally.
|
||
|
||
T. Henderson - Legal Review
|
||
|
||
Privileged motion tabled and seconded by Courtney
|
||
Harris
|
||
|
||
4 Opposed
|
||
9 For
|
||
|
||
Motion to accept results of election upon Legal review:
|
||
|
||
2 Yes
|
||
11 No Failed
|
||
|
||
Item tabled.
|
||
______________
|
||
|
||
Other Items of Old Business
|
||
|
||
Ethics Committee - Ethics Document
|
||
|
||
New Business
|
||
|
||
T. Henderson, on behalf of member(s), motioned to amend agenda
|
||
to disband under treasurer and to dispose of assets in
|
||
accordance with articles and order secretary to file necessary
|
||
papers with state of Missouri.
|
||
|
||
Vote called for:
|
||
|
||
0 Yes
|
||
10 No
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 17 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
3 Abstain (Irene, Tom, Dave Davidson) Failed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
A. (Agenda Item) Statement of Purpose - M.G. a single
|
||
vision to unite organization (in a 3-sentence
|
||
statement) should have:
|
||
|
||
a. What do you hope to accomplish?
|
||
b. How to accomplish it?
|
||
c. Who does it benefit?
|
||
|
||
Tabled after initial discussions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B. Two proposals for Fido News Policy
|
||
a. Mort Sternheim
|
||
b. David Drexler
|
||
c. From Pub. Report (Status Quo)
|
||
|
||
Don Daniels motion to table to breakout committee,
|
||
seconded Mort Sternheim (refer an at large) Authors
|
||
should be included.
|
||
|
||
Tabled.
|
||
|
||
C. IFNA - Oklahoma City Office and proposal - motion M.G.
|
||
and seconded by David Drexler.
|
||
|
||
Kris Veitch has agreed to let us use part of his office.
|
||
|
||
Hospital - printing business card free - it is a non-
|
||
profit hospital.
|
||
|
||
Fund-raising/educational proposal presented.
|
||
amended - take out expected $100.00 expense limit.
|
||
Unanimous vote - Yes.
|
||
|
||
Office expenses approved at $100.00 per month with
|
||
receipts.
|
||
|
||
Multiple Fund Raisers Proposal by David Drexler tabled for
|
||
later discussion.
|
||
|
||
BIX - Accounting Procedures - see packet information (it was
|
||
noted that there was concern that BIX won't push paid
|
||
BIX accounts)
|
||
|
||
D. Daniels motion to accept procedure, seconded. Vote
|
||
carried 12 for and 1 Abstained.
|
||
|
||
Executive Committee shall approve application - Committee
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 18 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
members can apply if such use can be justified as this is
|
||
not limited to BOD Members.
|
||
|
||
Treasurer - Appointment of such
|
||
|
||
Motion for Kris Veitch to be nominated as Treasurer by
|
||
Courtney Harris, seconded by Mort
|
||
|
||
Secretary established Kris as Treasurer
|
||
|
||
Election of Chairman of Board -
|
||
|
||
Suggested that:
|
||
|
||
A. Chairman be able to moderate electronics sessions
|
||
effectively
|
||
|
||
B. Rudolph open floor to nomiations for Chairman
|
||
|
||
1. Thom Henderson nominates Irene H., D. Melnick
|
||
seconded.
|
||
|
||
2. Mort nominates D. Daniels - Don asked not be
|
||
considered
|
||
|
||
3. D. Daniels nominates Mort Sternheim, C. Harris
|
||
seconded
|
||
|
||
Dave Davidson motioned that nominations close,
|
||
Kris seconded
|
||
|
||
After short speeches by candidates, Mort elected.
|
||
|
||
VPTC - Ben Baker nominated by I. Henderson, Wm Burnhoff
|
||
nominated by Thom Henderson. Item tabled by D. Daniels
|
||
and seconded by L. Grennan. Vote carried. Tabled.
|
||
|
||
Secretary Position
|
||
|
||
Linda Grennan abstained from voting.
|
||
|
||
C. Harris motioned move to accept David Garrett
|
||
resignation as secretary.
|
||
|
||
Irene nominates L. Grennan, C. Harris seconded. Close
|
||
nominations.
|
||
|
||
Linda Grennan established as Secretary.
|
||
|
||
DAK Agreement
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 19 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Letter of understanding between DAK and IFNA described.
|
||
|
||
- Is not definite that nodelist agreement will be dropped.
|
||
|
||
- Courtney states he will abstain on any vote pertaining to DAK
|
||
|
||
- C. H.: $30,000 was donated to American Cancer Society (from
|
||
sales of nodelist package)
|
||
|
||
- C. H.: 30,000 copies have been distributed
|
||
|
||
- C. H.: Possible 5% to go back to IFNA
|
||
|
||
- D. Daniels - Stated Executive Committee previously decided not
|
||
to pursue money issue.
|
||
|
||
- D. Daniels read letter of understanding for discussion.
|
||
|
||
- Executive Committee directed to resolve mailing out
|
||
copies of nodelist received by IFNA generated by DAK ad.
|
||
|
||
Courtney Harris - Proposals
|
||
|
||
1) DAK - 10% from Nodelist deal to be investigated.
|
||
|
||
2) FAX Board - Retail $229.00 - propose do a pamphlet with
|
||
possibly 10 items available to IFNA and Fidonet members
|
||
|
||
T. Henderson motion to move it to Membership Services
|
||
for consideration, seconded by Mark Peters, vote carried.
|
||
|
||
3) Image files attach to messages CGA or VGA image -
|
||
public protocol to possible be set.
|
||
|
||
Sent to Committee.
|
||
|
||
D. Daniels said it has been suggested electronic ballots to be
|
||
sent to redistribution points (in the future) - Bill Bolton
|
||
and Henk Wevers. Problem here with current bylaws, however.
|
||
|
||
Bylaws Election Voted on an accepted with reservations due to
|
||
the overseas problems. D. Daniels abstained
|
||
D. Daniels reported results of voting of Bylaws Election:
|
||
|
||
|
||
(DEF=Definition)
|
||
|
||
ITEM---VOTE ITEM---VOTE ITEM---VOTE ITEM---VOTE
|
||
|
||
DEF.01 No DEF.02 Yes DEF.03 Yes DEF.04 Yes
|
||
DEF.05 Yes DEF.06 Yes 01.01 Yes 01.02 Yes
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 20 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
01.03 No 01.04 No 01.05 No 02/03 Yes
|
||
04 Yes 05 Yes 06 Yes 07 Yes
|
||
09 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes
|
||
14 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes
|
||
19 Yes 22 Yes 24.01 Yes 24.02 Yes
|
||
24.03 Yes 24.04 Yes 24.05 Yes 24.06 No
|
||
24.07 No 24.08 Yes 28 Yes 29 Yes
|
||
30 Yes 35.01 Yes 35.02 Yes 39 Yes
|
||
40.01 Yes 40.02 Yes 42 Yes 43 Yes
|
||
44 Yes 45 Yes
|
||
|
||
Written Report to be given to Secretary
|
||
|
||
Table Article 10 per D. Daniels
|
||
|
||
Nodelist Copyright notice - D. Daniels motion it go to ad hoc
|
||
committee, seconded. So also stated by Chairman Mort Sternheim.
|
||
D. Daniels read suggest change of copyright notice, Mort motioned
|
||
to table copyright notice, vote carried.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Hobbyist vs Commercial Issues - Discussion of various
|
||
matters. Sent to committee.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Statement of Purpose - Discussion
|
||
|
||
1. What do we want to accomplish
|
||
2. How to accomplish
|
||
3. For Who's Benefit
|
||
|
||
Matter discussed and sent to committee.
|
||
|
||
Discussion of V. Division - now 24 directors according
|
||
to new Bylaws.
|
||
|
||
BoD is too large and cumbersome. Sent to
|
||
Bylaws and N&Elections committees for recommendations.
|
||
|
||
Meeting adjourned until next day.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Sunday February 19, 1989 Meeting Reconvened
|
||
|
||
New Business
|
||
|
||
Discussed Fido Con - FidoCon expense. Proposal submitted
|
||
by D. Drexler. Irene amended suggestion that all of
|
||
IFNA existing bills be paid first before any money
|
||
issued to Fidod Con.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 21 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
T. Henderson - amendment to 1/2 of treasury not to
|
||
exceed $2,000 - seconded by D. Melnick
|
||
|
||
Motion was carried and adopted.
|
||
|
||
Motion to have Bylaws accepted from recent election and placed
|
||
into effect. Motion carried.
|
||
|
||
Readdressed:
|
||
|
||
Creation of Statement of Purpose - Dave
|
||
|
||
Proposed sentence:
|
||
|
||
The purpose of IFNA is to promote electronic
|
||
communications by the dissemination and advancement of
|
||
Fidonet Technology.
|
||
|
||
Irene motioned to accept and seconded by Kris Veitch.
|
||
|
||
Motion to accept Statement carried unanimously.
|
||
|
||
Appointment of VPTC
|
||
___________________
|
||
|
||
Both B. Baker and William Burhoff declined nomination; C.
|
||
Harris nominated Bill Bolton and seconded by D.
|
||
Davidson; T. Henderson nominated Bob Hartman.
|
||
Nominations closed.
|
||
|
||
Discussion of nominations. Bylaw 29 read (revised) by Irene.
|
||
|
||
Bolton elected.
|
||
|
||
Motion - Kris Veitch
|
||
|
||
K. V. - that if both VPTC candidates decline, Executive
|
||
Committee will decide, seconded.
|
||
|
||
Motion carried
|
||
|
||
Nodelist Copyright -
|
||
|
||
Kris V. - IFNA hereby grant to operation of systems
|
||
Fido Net technology a limited license to use FidoNet
|
||
nodelist in the operation of their system. (get with T.
|
||
on a wording), seconded by T. Henderson. Call for vote
|
||
|
||
2 obstained (Ted being one)
|
||
Motion carried
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 22 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
D. Daniels - amend to add "FidoNet is trademark of Tom
|
||
Jennings", seconded by Irene.
|
||
|
||
C. Harris felt it was a mistake that IFNA doesn't
|
||
control the nodelist on behalf of FidoNet sysops and plans to
|
||
enter motion later to get that back.
|
||
|
||
Call for vote. Passed
|
||
|
||
By-Laws Amendments and Changes
|
||
|
||
Voting Division - D. Daniels, seconded C. Harris
|
||
(resolution 5.77 annual fee, Kris called for reading
|
||
___ large ballot)
|
||
|
||
Due to the fact that our Bylaws require that we send ballot via
|
||
postal mail to all members; that it would not be fair for
|
||
regular dues paying members to underwrite all the potential
|
||
at-large members for which no dues are presently established;
|
||
and that the BoD is empowered by the Bylaws to set membership
|
||
fees, the BoD hereby establishes an annual processing fee of
|
||
$5.77 (actual cost of the last ballot) for applicants for
|
||
at-large membership.
|
||
|
||
Call for vote
|
||
Passed.
|
||
|
||
Official communications of the Board of Directors or Executive
|
||
Committee may be presented, in lieu of written form as called
|
||
for within these bylaws, through electronic means, providing
|
||
such means are secure and their authenticity verifiable.
|
||
|
||
Call for vote
|
||
Passed.
|
||
|
||
Any elected or appointed official may be removed for failure
|
||
to adequately perform the assigned duties as defined by the
|
||
Board of Directors.
|
||
|
||
(a) The Chairman of the Board of Directors may recommend the
|
||
removal of an appointed official to the Board of Directors.
|
||
The removal will be effective upon a majority vote of those
|
||
voting at a properly convened meeting of the Board or by
|
||
electronic mail or by postal mail.
|
||
|
||
(b) The Executive Committee may recommend the removal of a
|
||
Director or elected official to the Board of Directors.
|
||
The removal will be effective upon a majority vote of those
|
||
voting at a properly convened meeting of the Board or by
|
||
electronic mail or by postal mail.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 23 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Call for vote
|
||
Passed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
An Alternate replacing a Director temporarily or permanently
|
||
assumes the seat on the Board of Directors but no other
|
||
elected or appointed position.
|
||
|
||
Call for vote
|
||
Passed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
T. Henderson - motion to direct Treasurer to pay CPA
|
||
bill for election, seconded; vote - motion
|
||
carried;
|
||
|
||
Next Meeting - Fido Con 89 unless it doesn't happen -
|
||
C. Harris seconded by M. Grennan. At Fido Con exact
|
||
time to be specified later and BOD be notified -
|
||
approved.
|
||
|
||
C. H. motioned, seconded M.G. to adjourn to next
|
||
meeting - vote unanimous
|
||
|
||
Meeting closed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 24 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Don Daniels, Voting Member
|
||
(at the request of Bob Rudolph, Chairman)
|
||
1:107/210
|
||
|
||
Executive Committee Report
|
||
|
||
The question of at-large memberships has been brought up recently
|
||
by several individuals who have wondered why no provision was
|
||
made for them in the current elections. This report attempts to
|
||
explain that, though you will find that it is a complicated
|
||
and unfortunate matter.
|
||
|
||
First of all, it makes sense to look at the bylaw amendment on
|
||
which the whole problem is based:
|
||
|
||
1 f) At-Large Member. To be eligible, an applicant: must be the
|
||
system operator in good standing of a PUBLIC ACCESS node;
|
||
must have been listed in the FIDONET NODELIST for 180 days
|
||
prior to the ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING; is entitled to
|
||
one vote for the election of the At-Large Members of the
|
||
Board of Directors only.
|
||
|
||
While we're at it, three more bylaws (or portions thereof) will
|
||
also come into play so let's list them here:
|
||
|
||
4. Annual Fees
|
||
b) The annual membership fees shall be set by the Board of
|
||
Directors.
|
||
|
||
13. The Nominations and Elections Committee shall arrange to
|
||
have a certified public accountant receive and collate all
|
||
mail BALLOTS received prior to the ANNUAL MEETING, and to be
|
||
responsible for the receipt, tabulation and verification of
|
||
all BALLOTS cast before the close of voting...
|
||
|
||
11. ... At least forty (40) days prior to the ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
|
||
MEETING the Secretary ... shall send to every voting member,
|
||
... a ballot ...
|
||
|
||
Note that "BALLOT" is defined: "BALLOT: A paper listing of
|
||
all candidates for office and issues requiring a vote...".
|
||
|
||
[Complete text of the IFNA Articles of Association and Bylaws are
|
||
available for file request as BYLAWS.ARC from 1:107/210.]
|
||
|
||
This last bylaw (11) has a very significant impact on this entire
|
||
matter as it requires IFNA to send a ballot (via postal mail) to
|
||
every at-large member, which could conceivably run into the
|
||
thousands. The Board of Directors was very conscious that it
|
||
would truly be unfair for the dues of the regular members to be
|
||
utilized to pay for the handling of the ballots of those that
|
||
were unwilling to pay the US$25.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 25 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Although it may indeed have been the author's original intent
|
||
that this bylaw amendment would result in no dues being required
|
||
for at-large members and in the at-large member being totally
|
||
responsible for any and all costs associated with handling of the
|
||
ballots, no provision was made for such eventualities in the new
|
||
bylaw itself. The Board was therefore forced to act within the
|
||
bounds of what was actually written.
|
||
|
||
Accordingly, the Board in the Meeting in St. Louis, voted in a
|
||
annual at-large membership fee that would cover all the costs of
|
||
preparing, mailing, and processing a ballot. In determining the
|
||
amount of this fee, the Board simply chose to utilize the actual,
|
||
per-ballot cost incurred during the most recent election, which
|
||
was US$5.77 for the election completed last January.
|
||
|
||
From the very first line of Bylaw 1-f it is obvious that an
|
||
individual must make an application to become an at-large member
|
||
of IFNA. Such application is based upon the requirement (among
|
||
others) that said applicant "must have been listed in the FIDONET
|
||
NODELIST for 180 days prior to the ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING".
|
||
Now this is not at all explicit in its meaning and has been the
|
||
subject of considerable debate regarding its intended and legal
|
||
interpretations.
|
||
|
||
The IFNA BoD discussed this aspect at some length in its meeting
|
||
in February and the Executive Committee has recently been in
|
||
touch with IFNA's legal counsel for his opinion on the matter,
|
||
with the result that it is understood that the intent would be
|
||
expected to be inferred to mean the 180 CONSECUTIVE days
|
||
immediately prior to the actual day on which the annual
|
||
membership meeting takes place. The convincing argument for this
|
||
point is that if there were to be an interpretation to the
|
||
contrary, then ANY 180 days would suffice and there would be no
|
||
relevancy in even mentioning the annual membership meeting.
|
||
|
||
The Board of Directors was aware of this interpretation in
|
||
February, and had realized that there was a significant problem
|
||
in that the upcoming election would be completed some days prior
|
||
to the annual membership meeting, with the result that it was
|
||
therefore expected that no application could legally be made that
|
||
would allow participation of any at-large member in that
|
||
election. Accordingly, [and, I personally believe, in concert
|
||
with the general feeling of the Board members by that time that
|
||
FidoNet Sysops as a whole had basically chosen, explicitly or
|
||
implicitly, that IFNA was not to have any involvement with the
|
||
Administration of FidoNet and that there was therefore no need of
|
||
having an at-large membership category] no further action was
|
||
taken on the matter.
|
||
|
||
However, there has come to light a loophole in the above
|
||
thinking. You see, due to requirements that the ballot be
|
||
received by a CPA and the difficulties IFNA has had in obtaining
|
||
such services in the past, it had been assumed that acceptance of
|
||
ballots by other than mail would not legally be providable during
|
||
this election. As it turned out, the Nominations and Elections
|
||
Committee was fortunate to arrange for the services of CPA Robert
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 26 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
C. Halvorsen????? who will be attending FidoCon '89, so the rules
|
||
for this election do provide for ballots to be submitted by hand
|
||
at FidoCon until Noon on Friday, August 25.
|
||
|
||
Because the nodelist (89237) which covers the final two days
|
||
prior to the annual membership meeting will have been released
|
||
earlier that morning, it is then theoretically possible that
|
||
someone might be able to satisfy the 180 day requirement that
|
||
morning, qualify to be an at-large member in all other respects,
|
||
and therefore submit an application, membership fee, and ballot
|
||
prior to the Noon deadline. However, the fact that the IFNA
|
||
administrators who presently handle membership applications will
|
||
not be attending FidoCon (due to personal reasons) still
|
||
complicates this whole possibility.
|
||
|
||
Note that in any event, it would still be impossible for those
|
||
potential at-large members wishing to submit ballots by mail, to
|
||
do so and meet the 180 day requirement as the published deadline
|
||
for mail-in ballots is Noon on Thursday, August 24, which is
|
||
prior to the final required Nodelist publication date.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, it is now the decision of the Executive Committee that
|
||
the BoD's original assessment that no at-large members would be
|
||
legally allowed to participate in this election still stands, in
|
||
terms of all mail-in ballots. As to any ballots from potential
|
||
at-large members hand delivered to the appropriate receiving
|
||
point at FidoCon prior to the Noon, Friday, August 25 deadline,
|
||
such ballots would be considered valid provided they are
|
||
accompanied by an official IFNA membership application form
|
||
marked "At-large Member" (applications are available in the back
|
||
of most issues of FidoNews), the fee of US$5.77 (note that this
|
||
fee also provides for a(ny) ballot(s) to be sent during the
|
||
coming year), and supporting documention to demonstrate that the
|
||
applicant meets the requirements of at-large membership,
|
||
including being a System Operator in good standing of a public
|
||
access node and the inclusion, without break (yes, we are aware
|
||
that that may prove neither fair nor the intent, but we have been
|
||
advised that it is the present legal interpretation) of their
|
||
name in all nodelists from 89055 through 89237.
|
||
|
||
Note that anyone who is interested in becoming an at-large member
|
||
of IFNA for the 1989-1990 time frame must meet the qualifications
|
||
stated in the previous paragraph and should send their
|
||
application to the address provided on the application once it
|
||
has been established that they qualify for such membership.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 27 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Nominations and Elections Committee
|
||
1:107/233
|
||
|
||
Report from Nominations and Elections Committee
|
||
|
||
As indicated in a previous report, the committee is presenting
|
||
statements from those individuals who have expressed interest in
|
||
serving FidoNet as Directors of IFNA. The committee has not
|
||
validated any of the material in these reports. If you are
|
||
interested in serving on the BoD but your statement has not
|
||
appeared herein, please forward it to 1:107/210 immediately.
|
||
|
||
The following statement has been edited by the committee to
|
||
meet established size constraints; for full text see IFNA Echo
|
||
Conference.
|
||
|
||
================================================================
|
||
|
||
FABIAN GORDON
|
||
|
||
I always felt that IFNA should play an important role - a role
|
||
not solely directed at one particular group or class of people,
|
||
but rather anyone who wanted or needed it. What we all have to
|
||
remember is that IFNA was originally designed as the guiding
|
||
force behind FidoNet, with many meaningful goals and intentions.
|
||
I still believe in this, which is why I originally joined IFNA
|
||
and recently volunteered to represent my fellow SysOp on its
|
||
board of directors.
|
||
|
||
We ALL have one problem, and that is that we do not have
|
||
some central force behind our efforts, holding our hands and
|
||
advising us of what our technical and legal liabilities and
|
||
concerns are. I firmly believe that IFNA can be such a force.
|
||
|
||
[Therefore], the major factors in my interest in becoming an IFNA
|
||
representative are:
|
||
|
||
1. To promote the interests and activities of our fellow SysOps
|
||
to the community at large. Let's all show them how WE can
|
||
help change their lives.
|
||
|
||
2. To promote and ease the peaceful coexistence of our brother
|
||
networks, who are also trying to do what we do.
|
||
|
||
3. To continuously expand the meaningfulness and integrity of our
|
||
communications and our technology.
|
||
|
||
4. To provide an oasis of technological, legal, and social
|
||
assistance for ALL SysOps, regardless of network affiliation.
|
||
|
||
5. To provide an mechanism whereby all SysOps can unite and
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 28 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
provide a powerful force which will fight for our rights and
|
||
privileges.
|
||
|
||
Fabian Gordon, NC: FidoNet 1:107, AlterNet 520, GoodEggNet 9230
|
||
|
||
================================================================
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 29 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
OFFICERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIDONET ASSOCIATION
|
||
|
||
Mort Sternheim 1:321/109 Chairman of the Board
|
||
Bob Rudolph 1:261/628 President
|
||
Matt Whelan 3:3/1 Vice President
|
||
Bill Bolton 3:711/403 Vice President-Technical Coordinator
|
||
Linda Grennan 1:147/1 Secretary
|
||
Kris Veitch 1:147/30 Treasurer
|
||
|
||
|
||
IFNA COMMITTEE AND BOARD CHAIRS
|
||
|
||
Administration and Finance Mark Grennan 1:147/1
|
||
Board of Directors Mort Sternheim 1:321/109
|
||
Bylaws Don Daniels 1:107/210
|
||
Ethics Vic Hill 1:147/4
|
||
Executive Committee Bob Rudolph 1:261/628
|
||
International Affairs Rob Gonsalves 2:500/1
|
||
Membership Services David Drexler 1:147/47
|
||
Nominations & Elections David Melnick 1:107/233
|
||
Public Affairs David Drexler 1:147/47
|
||
Publications Rick Siegel 1:107/27
|
||
Security & Individual Rights Jim Cannell 1:143/21
|
||
Technical Standards Rick Moore 1:115/333
|
||
|
||
|
||
IFNA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
||
|
||
DIVISION AT-LARGE
|
||
|
||
10 Courtney Harris 1:102/732 Don Daniels 1:107/210
|
||
11 Bill Allbritten 1:11/301 Mort Sternheim 1:321/109
|
||
12 Bill Bolton 3:711/403 Mark Grennan 1:147/1
|
||
13 Irene Henderson 1:107/9 (vacant)
|
||
14 Ken Kaplan 1:100/22 Ted Polczyinski 1:154/5
|
||
15 Scott Miller 1:128/12 Matt Whelan 3:3/1
|
||
16 Ivan Schaffel 1:141/390 Robert Rudolph 1:261/628
|
||
17 Neal Curtin 1:343/1 Steve Jordan 1:206/2871
|
||
18 Andrew Adler 1:135/47 Kris Veitch 1:147/30
|
||
19 David Drexler 1:147/47 (vacant)
|
||
2 Henk Wevers 2:500/1 David Melnik 1:107/233
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 30 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
__
|
||
The World's First / \
|
||
BBS Network /|oo \
|
||
* FidoNet * (_| /_)
|
||
FidoCon '89 in San Jose, California _`@/_ \ _
|
||
at The Holiday Inn Park Plaza | | \ \\
|
||
August 24-27, 1989 | (*) | \ ))
|
||
______ |__U__| / \//
|
||
/ Fido \ _//|| _\ /
|
||
(________) (_/(_|(____/ (tm)
|
||
|
||
|
||
R E G I S T R A T I O N F O R M
|
||
|
||
|
||
Name: _______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Address: ____________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
City: _______________________ State: ____ Zip: ______________
|
||
|
||
Country: ____________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Phone Numbers:
|
||
|
||
Day: ________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Evening: ____________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Data: _______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Zone:Net/
|
||
Node.Point: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Your BBS Name: ________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
BBS Software: _____________________ Mailer: ___________________
|
||
|
||
Modem Brand: _____________________ Speed: ____________________
|
||
|
||
At what hotel will you be staying: ____________________________
|
||
|
||
Do you want an in room point? (Holiday Inn only) ______________
|
||
|
||
Are you a Sysop? _____________
|
||
|
||
Are you an IFNA Member? ______
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 31 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Additional Guests: __________
|
||
(not attending conferences)
|
||
|
||
Do you have any special requirements? (Sign Language translation,
|
||
handicapped, etc.)
|
||
|
||
______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Comments: ______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Costs How Many? Cost
|
||
--------------------------- -------- -------
|
||
|
||
Conference fee $60 .................... ________ _______
|
||
($75.00 after July 15)
|
||
|
||
Friday Banquet $30.00 ................ ________ _______
|
||
|
||
======== =======
|
||
|
||
Totals ................................ ________ _______
|
||
|
||
You may pay by Check, Money Order, or Credit Card. Please send
|
||
no cash. All monies must be in U.S. Funds. Checks should be
|
||
made out to: "FidoCon '89"
|
||
|
||
|
||
This form should be completed and mailed to:
|
||
|
||
Silicon Valley FidoCon '89
|
||
PO Box 390770
|
||
Mountain View, CA 94039
|
||
|
||
|
||
You may register by Netmailing this completed form to 1:1/89 for
|
||
processing. Rename it to ZNNNXXXX.REG where Z is your Zone
|
||
number, N is your Net number, and X is your Node number. US Mail
|
||
confirmation is required within 72 hours to confirm your
|
||
registration.
|
||
|
||
If you are paying by credit card, please include the following
|
||
information. For your own security, do not route any message
|
||
with your credit card number on it. Crash it directly to 1:1/89.
|
||
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 32 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
Master Card _______ Visa ________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Credit Card Number _____________________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Expiration Date ________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Signature ______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
No credit card registrations will be accepted without a valid
|
||
signature.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Rooms at the Holiday Inn may be reserved by calling the Hotel at
|
||
408-998-0400, and mentioning that you are with FidoCon. Rooms
|
||
are $60.00 per night double occupancy. Additional rollaways are
|
||
available for $10.00 per night. To obtain these rates you must
|
||
register before July 15.
|
||
|
||
The official FidoCon '89 airline is American Airlines. You can
|
||
receive either a 5% reduction in supersaver fares or a 40%
|
||
reduction in the regular day coach fare. San Jose is an American
|
||
Airlines hub with direct flights to most major cities. When
|
||
making reservations, you must call American's reservation number,
|
||
800-433-1790, and reference Star number S0289VM.
|
||
|
||
The official FidoCon '89 automobile rental agency is Alamo Rent a
|
||
Car. Rates are as described below. All rates include automatic
|
||
transmission, air conditioning, radio, and unlimited mileage.
|
||
|
||
Economy car (example: Geo Metro) $32 day/$109 week.
|
||
Compact car (example: Chevy Cavalier) $34 day/$120 week.
|
||
Midsize car (example: Pontiac Grand Am) $36 day/$135 week.
|
||
Standard car (example: Buick Regal) $38 day/$165 week.
|
||
Luxury car (example: Buick LeSabre) $40 day/$239 week.
|
||
|
||
To take advantage of this rate, call Alamo at 1-800-327-9633 and
|
||
request the convention rate. Mention FidoCon '89, the location
|
||
and dates.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 33 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
__
|
||
The World's First / \
|
||
BBS Network /|oo \
|
||
* FidoNet * (_| /_)
|
||
_`@/_ \ _
|
||
| | \ \\
|
||
| (*) | \ ))
|
||
______ |__U__| / \//
|
||
/ Fido \ _//|| _\ /
|
||
(________) (_/(_|(____/ (tm)
|
||
|
||
Membership for the International FidoNet Association
|
||
|
||
Membership in IFNA is open to any individual or organization that
|
||
pays a specified annual membership fee. IFNA serves the
|
||
international FidoNet-compatible electronic mail community to
|
||
increase worldwide communications.
|
||
|
||
Member Name _______________________________ Date _______________
|
||
Address _________________________________________________________
|
||
City ____________________________________________________________
|
||
State ________________________________ Zip _____________________
|
||
Country _________________________________________________________
|
||
Home Phone (Voice) ______________________________________________
|
||
Work Phone (Voice) ______________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Zone:Net/Node Number ____________________________________________
|
||
BBS Name ________________________________________________________
|
||
BBS Phone Number ________________________________________________
|
||
Baud Rates Supported ____________________________________________
|
||
Board Restrictions ______________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Your Special Interests __________________________________________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________
|
||
In what areas would you be willing to help in FidoNet? __________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________
|
||
Send this membership form and a check or money order for $25 in
|
||
US Funds to:
|
||
International FidoNet Association
|
||
PO Box 41143
|
||
St Louis, Missouri 63141
|
||
USA
|
||
|
||
Thank you for your membership! Your participation will help to
|
||
insure the future of FidoNet.
|
||
|
||
Please NOTE that IFNA is a general not-for-profit organization
|
||
and Articles of Association and By-Laws were adopted by the
|
||
membership in January 1987. The second elected Board of Directors
|
||
was filled in August 1988. The IFNA Echomail Conference has been
|
||
established on FidoNet to assist the Board. We welcome your
|
||
input to this Conference.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 6-32 Page 34 7 Aug 1989
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|