701 lines
35 KiB
Plaintext
701 lines
35 KiB
Plaintext
Volume 4, Number 9 2 March 1987
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| _ |
|
||
| / \ |
|
||
| /|oo \ |
|
||
| - FidoNews - (_| /_) |
|
||
| _`@/_ \ _ |
|
||
| International | | \ \\ |
|
||
| FidoNet Association | (*) | \ )) |
|
||
| Newsletter ______ |__U__| / \// |
|
||
| / FIDO \ _//|| _\ / |
|
||
| (________) (_/(_|(____/ |
|
||
| (jm) |
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
Editor in Chief: Thom Henderson
|
||
Chief Procrastinator Emeritus: Tom Jennings
|
||
|
||
FidoNews is the official newsletter of the International FidoNet
|
||
Association, and is published weekly by SEAdog Leader, node 1/1.
|
||
You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
|
||
FidoNews. Article submission standards are contained in the file
|
||
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from node 1/1.
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) 1987, by the International FidoNet Association.
|
||
All rights reserved. Duplication and/or distribution permitted
|
||
for noncommercial purposes only. For use in other circumstances,
|
||
please contact IFNA.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
1. EDITORIAL
|
||
Editor Unleashed!
|
||
2. ARTICLES
|
||
AMIGA Update
|
||
Update on Fido version 12
|
||
Reply to "Reply to GAGS Shareware Expenses"
|
||
An open letter to all SYSOP
|
||
Tax Program Developers Heed!
|
||
3. COLUMNS
|
||
An Irregular Column
|
||
4. NOTICES
|
||
The Interrupt Stack
|
||
WARNING: Phony PC-Write
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 2 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
EDITORIAL
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
Editor Unleashed!
|
||
|
||
I have a confession to make. I've been holding back.
|
||
|
||
You see, somehow or other I found myself on the interim Board of
|
||
Directors. One of three in the limelight, as it were; one of
|
||
three "targets" who gets to take the heat.
|
||
|
||
It's been uncomfortable, for a number of reasons. Mainly it's
|
||
been uncomfortable by choice. You see, during the whole recent
|
||
debate on the bylaws I felt that it would not be proper for me to
|
||
comment on the proposed bylaws one way or the other. Undue
|
||
influence, and all that.
|
||
|
||
But holding my tongue is an uncomfortable position -- for me more
|
||
than most, I suppose. No one who has ever known me has
|
||
considered me reticent, so far as I'm aware. But the election is
|
||
past now, so I am free to speak my mind. It may come as a bit of
|
||
a surprise to a few people.
|
||
|
||
I don't like the bylaws.
|
||
|
||
They are more suited to a major nation or a multi-million dollar
|
||
corporation than to us. They call for a 22 person Board of
|
||
Directors, which is ridiculous when you stop to think that IFNA
|
||
only has about 200 dues paying members. They mandate a half a
|
||
dozen or more standing committees, most of which oversee things
|
||
that a single person could handle better. Worst of all, they are
|
||
incredibly paranoid!
|
||
|
||
Here's one example of paranoia. The treasurer is not allowed to
|
||
chose a bank to put the money in. The Finance Committee has to
|
||
recommend a bank, and the entire board has to approve it. All
|
||
this for a few thousand bucks? My own inclination is to leave it
|
||
all up to the treasurer. In short, pick someone you trust, and
|
||
then trust him! It'll be hard enough to find anyone willing to
|
||
do the work anyway without hanging a dozen or so overseers on his
|
||
neck.
|
||
|
||
That's just one example out of many. Read the bylaws. Take a
|
||
good, long look at them. Does this sound like a bunch of sysops
|
||
getting together, or Megacorp Inc?
|
||
|
||
I've already shown you something I like better, though you
|
||
probably didn't know it was me. You probably didn't take it
|
||
seriously either, in spite of the fact that this is supposed to
|
||
be FUN! Why do we do it if it isn't fun? Do you remember the
|
||
alternate proposed bylaws for the Intergalactic FidoNet Alliance?
|
||
I wrote them, and I was dead serious.
|
||
|
||
The whole point of the Alliance was to remind us all that this is
|
||
supposed to be fun. We're doing this because we enjoy it,
|
||
Fidonews Page 3 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
remember? So why not adopt bylaws that will remind us of that?
|
||
|
||
I've come to realize that even those bylaws were too restrictive.
|
||
I plan on revising them (i.e. chopping out even more manure) and
|
||
publishing them again. I'm hoping that I can at least get people
|
||
to use different terms. Why have a Board of Directors? That's
|
||
what businesses have. Why not have a Council of Lords instead?
|
||
I think "Grand Wizard" is a much better term than "Vice President
|
||
of Technical Operations." Instead of having a President, it'd be
|
||
much more descriptive of the actual job to call him a Whipping
|
||
Boy.
|
||
|
||
This carries through to other areas as well. The FidoNet
|
||
Technical Standards Committee sounds like a stuffy group of
|
||
people bent on maintaining the status quo. But call them The
|
||
Ironmongers Squad and it sounds like they have more room to play
|
||
in. Why have a Publications Committee when you can have the
|
||
Rumormongers Squad? The Membership Services Committee sounds
|
||
dull and boring; the Graft and Vice Squad sounds like a LOT more
|
||
fun!
|
||
|
||
After all, isn't that what it's all about?
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 4 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
ARTICLES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
Mark Randall, 102/962
|
||
|
||
I just got back from CES and Commodore did not show the new
|
||
machines that I predicted they would. Many people were upset and
|
||
disapointed. They DID however have the new machines there,
|
||
tucked away upstairs in their booth under guard. They were
|
||
showing them to a few people (very few) and only after a very
|
||
nasty and lengthy non-disclosure statement had been signed.
|
||
|
||
Unfortunately, I had to sign one of those agreements before being
|
||
permited up the magic stairs to mecca. I can't go any more in to
|
||
detail for obvious reasons and after all my word is my word (and
|
||
Commodore hasn't layed off their legal deptartment yet). BUT I
|
||
can tell you how I felt after I came back down the stairs.
|
||
|
||
It was a lovely day in Las Vegas. The kind of day that makes you
|
||
feel wonderful. The kind of day that makes you feel good about
|
||
the future. The NEAR future. I looked around the booth and
|
||
thought about how it was going to be a very good spring for Amiga
|
||
and a very bad summer for Tramiel & Sons.
|
||
|
||
I listened to the people that were complaining about the lack of
|
||
new hardware at the Amiga booth and the plethora of new vapor
|
||
machines at the Atari booth. I thought about how smart it is for
|
||
some companies to hold off announcing computers until they are
|
||
sure of delivery dates. How smart it is for some companies to
|
||
try to turn around their reputations by delivering on time with
|
||
new products. I had a big dumb grin all over my face. I thought
|
||
about how wonderful it is that technology can march forward and
|
||
yet compatability can be preserved. I wish you had been there.
|
||
|
||
I hope you've enjoyed my observations of Las Vegas. Many of you
|
||
have committed your time and effort to making the Amiga a success
|
||
with no possibility of personal gain, just because you believe.
|
||
I think that you deserve more than to be left in the dark
|
||
wondering if you've been abandoned. I thought I'd do my what I
|
||
could to let you know that all our futures are very, very bright
|
||
indeed.
|
||
|
||
I'm sorry that I can't go into more detail but keep the faith,
|
||
Santa's just going to be a little late this year but it'll be
|
||
worth the wait!
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 5 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Ken Kaplan, Node 1/2
|
||
|
||
TJ and Fido Version 12
|
||
|
||
I had another chat with TJ about V12 yesterday and found out that
|
||
he has more problems, unrelated to Fido development, that will
|
||
unfortunately cause further delays. He is leaving APPLE in mid
|
||
January and going into business for himself. He is moving into a
|
||
San Francisco Warehouse with a number of others that will double
|
||
as a business office, and he is spending about one hour a week on
|
||
V12 development, which puts his current target date sometime in
|
||
second quarter of '87.
|
||
|
||
For those of us that have dealt with TJ over the past three years
|
||
this is disappointing, but not at all surprising. For those of
|
||
you beyond the 1200 node table limit in Fido we are hoping that
|
||
by telling the truth it will light a fire under a few more
|
||
FidoNet clone developers. SEAdog already has the limit problem
|
||
licked, OPUS development should consider a FidoNet Mail clone,
|
||
and hopefully others will follow suit. TJ may prerelease a
|
||
version of Fido with greater than a 1200 node limit, but I
|
||
wouldn't count on it happening very soon.
|
||
|
||
All I can suggest is that our friends in Regions 2 and 3 (Europe
|
||
and Australia) not give up hope since they are the most adversely
|
||
affected. Encourage new developers to pick up the FidoNet
|
||
Standards Documents and offer to assist the current FidoNet clone
|
||
developers when you find them.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 6 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Reply to "Reply to Shareware Expenses"
|
||
|
||
by Mark J. Welch, Fido 161/459 [private SEAdog node]
|
||
Berkeley, CA
|
||
(415) 841-8759 (voice)
|
||
|
||
|
||
In the February 16, 1987 edition of FidoNews (Volume 4, Number 7,
|
||
Page 8), Jeff Sheese (Sysop, THUD BBS [Opus], 110/10,
|
||
513-890-0422 data) posed some quite understandable questions
|
||
about whether my Shareware program, the Generic Advenure Game
|
||
System (GAGS), has really been as unprofitable as I said in my
|
||
earlier FidoNews article. I'd like to reply briefly to his
|
||
comments and try to explain how I do my accounting, and why I
|
||
charge some expenses to GAGS and other expenses to other things.
|
||
|
||
Needless to say, I didn't post the categories and numbers without
|
||
having solid defenses to each of them. If I was stretching
|
||
things, I wouldn't publicize the numbers since I already have
|
||
strange enough returns that only the merest luck has saved me
|
||
from scrutiny by the IRS.
|
||
|
||
First off, the easy stuff: the expenses for books, development
|
||
software, other software, postage, and supplies are, in fact,
|
||
strictly limited to expenses related to GAGS. Yes, I did reuse
|
||
the compilers and some of the books in other [aborted]
|
||
programming projects. Heck, some of the books ended up not being
|
||
useful at all. The key is that I bought them for use with GAGS
|
||
and with the recognition that they were for use as software
|
||
development tools. On the other hand, I used many resources
|
||
(about $1,000 worth of books in my library and over $2,000 worth
|
||
of software on the shelf, for example) which were paid for by
|
||
other activities, but made no effort to retrospectively apportion
|
||
their value to GAGS. [Those estimates on books and software are
|
||
conservative: anyone who wants to challenge those numbers is
|
||
welcome to a copy of a list of the software on my shelf, and to a
|
||
copy of the list of over $1,000 worth of computer books I've
|
||
proposed to donate to a local university library to make room on
|
||
my shelves for more books.]
|
||
|
||
The "Cost of Goods Sold" figure includes all the disks I
|
||
manufactured and mailed, including free copies to the press, user
|
||
groups, and many sysops, and also includes mailing envelopes and
|
||
such. I have receipts for everything, and it's all genuine "cost
|
||
of goods sold." It doesn't include postage, which is lumped under
|
||
"postage" along with all other postage expenses (including
|
||
updates and press releases); the postage category doesn't exclude
|
||
anything: remember that each disk costs just 39 cents to mail
|
||
(except to Europe).
|
||
|
||
The miscellaneous category, always suspicious, is also absolutely
|
||
pure: it does not include all my memberships or all my
|
||
subscriptions even to computer magazines, only those that are
|
||
related to GAGS. (It also includes other bizarre expenses.) I do
|
||
not (and legally cannot) take a separate tax deduction for these
|
||
memberships or subscriptions.
|
||
Fidonews Page 7 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
The phone category so aggressively challenged by Mr. Sheese hurts
|
||
most. I established my bulletin-board in an effort to create
|
||
goodwill so I could expand distribution of GAGS. My BBS, like
|
||
BBSs sponsored by computer stores and other software publishers,
|
||
had other programs on-line, and I sent FidoMail mostly about GAGS
|
||
but also about lots of other things. The BBS was established to
|
||
support GAGS, and whenever conflicts occurred, GAGS won. The BBS
|
||
was instrumental in distributing GAGS: FidoMail requests, file-
|
||
attaches (40 minutes on my dime), and regular callers allowed
|
||
GAGS to become available nationwide in a matter of weeks. When I
|
||
realized that GAGS would never pay the BBS expenses, I closed it
|
||
down (Fido 161/459 is a private SEAdog node to exchange FidoMail
|
||
only), saving the expense of the second phone line which had been
|
||
installed especially for GAGS and then relocated (a second $100
|
||
installation charge) when I moved.
|
||
|
||
Of course, I've held the most controversial category for last:
|
||
computer equipment. The $2,400 in that category is essentially
|
||
what turns an otherwise nearly-breakeven operation into a huge
|
||
loss. Again, I have other computer equipment here, and this
|
||
equipment was purchased for the single purpose of developing and
|
||
supporting GAGS. GAGS development and maintenance has accounted
|
||
for far more than half of the system's use, with GAGS-related
|
||
business activity accounting for another quarter. I have used it
|
||
for other things, and those "other things" (like writing
|
||
freelance articles) thus are not properly "charged" for the
|
||
expense of the computer, but neither is GAGS charged for the
|
||
publicity that results from my writing nor for the hardware and
|
||
software that predated GAGS or was acquired for some other
|
||
purpose. Another note: the computer equipment for which I paid
|
||
about $2,400 now has a resale value of about $500 to $750.
|
||
|
||
When I buy another system this year, as I certainly will, I will
|
||
"charge" it to some other activity, even though I will probably
|
||
use it part of the time for GAGS-related activities. And more
|
||
than likely, I will spend even more on the new system. (In the
|
||
unlikely event that I sell the old system, I would "credit" GAGS
|
||
for any income from that; I credited GAGS when I sold some
|
||
equipment in 1985, and that credit is incorporated into the
|
||
figures.)
|
||
|
||
Mr. Sheese is surely right about one thing that makes my numbers
|
||
easy to challenge: the "crossover effect" between activities is
|
||
substantial. It goes even further: I buy games for personal use
|
||
(Starflight, etc.), and although the games provide me with
|
||
insight into game development I wouldn't dream of calling those
|
||
purchases "expenses" for GAGS. Of course, neither do I allocate
|
||
10 percent of the system cost because I spend that amount of time
|
||
using it to play games, or 10 percent of the system time to the
|
||
"enterprise" of being a BIX [BYTE Information Exchange]
|
||
moderator, which is a quite enjoyable but unprofitable thing to
|
||
be. Before 1985, I spent a lot of time developing earlier
|
||
programs that were ancestors of GAGS, and GAGS wasn't "charged
|
||
back" for those expenses. Nor have I ever charged GAGS for any
|
||
portion of my trade show expenses, even though I spend a quarter
|
||
to a third of my time talking to publishers and the press about
|
||
Fidonews Page 8 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
GAGS. (I did charge GAGS for admissions to computer "swap meets"
|
||
when I was shopping around for my XT clone.)
|
||
|
||
My practice is to charge all current expenses to the current
|
||
projects. All my software development expenses were "charged" to
|
||
GAGS for the past 18 months because GAGS was my only published
|
||
product. Those aborted projects involved a total of perhaps ten
|
||
percent of the system use. Virtually all my computer and phone
|
||
expenses are now charged to my freelance writing activity,
|
||
because it produces the most income and activity.
|
||
|
||
|
||
For the IRS, because the activities are so overlapping, I lump
|
||
all freelance writing, programming, and consulting activities
|
||
together as a single "enterprise," which lost a couple grand in
|
||
1985 (because of GAGS) and made a fair amount of money in 1986
|
||
(because of growing freelance writing income). I broke out the
|
||
GAGS results only when I was making the decision to move GAGS
|
||
from Shareware to commercial distribution.
|
||
|
||
|
||
So, what does all this come down to? I think the numbers I used
|
||
are very close to reality. Surely, if I sat down and allocated
|
||
each fraction of an hour spent at the computer, and computed the
|
||
precise market value and cost of the hardware and software used
|
||
to develop GAGS, I could come up with a more secure number, but
|
||
I'm confident that the resulting number would be quite close to
|
||
the loss I mentioned in my earlier article.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 9 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Matt Giwer, The Pot of Gold (109/483)
|
||
|
||
An open letter to all SYSOP
|
||
|
||
This is an open letter to all SYSOPs. My eleven year old
|
||
son managed to download a file probably called SEX.ARC which
|
||
contained several rather crude pornographic animated graphics.
|
||
One of the files was PORNO.EXE. This file is possibly of German
|
||
origin.
|
||
|
||
OK. I am not really excited about this. At that age I
|
||
would have downloaded it but also I might have been smart enough
|
||
to keep it on a well hidden floppy.
|
||
|
||
The point of this message is this. If you think the GOV has
|
||
been interested in cracking down on BBSs because of potential
|
||
copyright infringement, just imagine what is going to happen if
|
||
some parent reports this file to The Moral Majority. Arguing the
|
||
law is one thing, arguing against a bunch of half-crazed puritan
|
||
parents is another. If files like this can be down-loaded by
|
||
people who are not legal adults and it hit the papers, BBSs are
|
||
asking for a crack-down that will not quit.
|
||
|
||
Books have been banned and burned for less than this.
|
||
|
||
Now legally, the person called and asked for the file and as
|
||
such I think that BBS operators are legally safe, just as the
|
||
phone call sex talk business is safe as long as the buyer calls
|
||
for the service. I am not a lawyer but I think that this is
|
||
correct.
|
||
|
||
The problem is some Oral Roberts (may he not collect his
|
||
$4.5M) gets his hands on this and starts condemning all BBSs and
|
||
all downloading because of one or two files. Those kinds of
|
||
fools do that sort of thing.
|
||
|
||
Please pass this message on. If you carry such files, try
|
||
to find a way to restrict access to 18 year olds. At best do not
|
||
carry such files at all. If you carry sexually oriented files,
|
||
then do you best to screen out the gross ones -- the kind that
|
||
will get public attention. Gross is what gets the public's
|
||
attention and no one will come to your defense. If the file is
|
||
artistically interesting, a well done nude then fine, the
|
||
Liberals will come to your defense and you will win politically.
|
||
But crude porn has few defenders.
|
||
|
||
Consider strongly,the control or removal of all crude/vulgar
|
||
sexually oriented programs, particularly grafix programs.
|
||
|
||
For further information, and for the file if you want it as
|
||
an example, you may contact me at 109/483.
|
||
|
||
Note that I will not upload the file simply to have it
|
||
listed for downloading. This sort of thing should not be on any
|
||
board for the reasons stated above.
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 10 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 11 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tax Program Developers Heed!
|
||
by Ben Baker -- 100/76
|
||
|
||
Someone from the IRS made an interesting statement in an
|
||
interview I heard on the radio this morning on my way to work.
|
||
|
||
If you develop and sell tax computation software, you are a
|
||
"tax preparer" in the eyes of the IRS. If a taxpayer's tax is
|
||
understated because of an error in your software, YOU are subject
|
||
to a "preparer's penalty" ammounting to 75 % of the ammount of
|
||
understatement.
|
||
|
||
I know there are a lot of you out there, so I thought I
|
||
should pass along this interesting little tid-bit. If you
|
||
distribute your s/w as "shareware" via the BBSs, your exposure
|
||
could be quite large, so MAKE DAMN SURE ANY ERRORS ARE ON THE
|
||
HIGH SIDE!
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 12 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
COLUMNS
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
The First of an Irregular Column
|
||
Dale Lovell
|
||
157/504
|
||
|
||
Even before I read Thom Henderson's comments on how small
|
||
FidoNews was becoming, I noticed how there didn't seem to be that
|
||
much in it anymore. I had been considering writing an irregularly
|
||
appearing column, but had been putting it off for a variety of
|
||
reasons. When I got and read FidoNews this week (Volume 4 Number
|
||
7) I decided it was time to finally do something. If things go
|
||
well, I should be sending off at least one column every month. If
|
||
anyone can come up with a cute, catchy name for it let me know
|
||
because I haven't been able to think of anything. I'll be giving
|
||
everyone my views and opinions on events, software and hardware
|
||
that come to my attention. If you have any comments on my column
|
||
either write an article for FidoNews or send me a message, I'll
|
||
try to go over any netmail in the end of future columns. That out
|
||
of the way, on to the column.
|
||
|
||
Finally got a copy of the Microsoft C last week and have
|
||
been looking over the docs and playing around with it. First off,
|
||
I didn't believe what anybody had to say about Codeview and was
|
||
surprised. It really is a great program. For the first time I was
|
||
able to watch the program execute (in my C source code) and the
|
||
programs output at the same time. Even back in the days when I
|
||
used BASIC I couldn't do it this easy. Since I've got two
|
||
monitors I had one monitor tracing the program and the other
|
||
"running" the program. For a lot of people that alone might be
|
||
worth the price of the compiler.
|
||
|
||
Another thing that I noticed much earlier is the size of the
|
||
documentation. Microsoft gives it to you in 3 of the IBM size
|
||
manuals. I spent over a day just going over it, and to me it
|
||
seems rather complete. I primarily dabble in programming and
|
||
don't consider myself a professional programmer yet so my
|
||
evaluation may not be perfect, I also haven't done that much
|
||
compiling. It did handle some programs from a UNIX system without
|
||
any problems (my old C compiler hated most of the stuff off UNIX
|
||
systems) and everything seems to run properly so I'm fairly
|
||
satisfied with it. My biggest complaint is Microsoft's function
|
||
key templates. I've got a 5151 keyboard and while they provide a
|
||
nice template for Codeview, it only works with function keys on
|
||
the left side of the keyboard, not on the top like mine.
|
||
|
||
Please note that this is NOT the package for someone
|
||
interested in learning a little about C or dabbling in it, this
|
||
is meant for someone doing professional software development or
|
||
at least something close to this. For someone interested in
|
||
learning C, I'd say you're better off with something like Let's C
|
||
or the new Turbo C from Borland. I haven't seen these packages,
|
||
but both have been recommended by others. I've also heard good
|
||
things about the DataLight C compiler, but unfortunately haven't
|
||
Fidonews Page 13 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
had a chance to see it yet. DataLight's current ad challenges
|
||
Microsoft to a speed test on compilation, linkage, and execution
|
||
time. If they lose, they won't advertise their product for 2
|
||
months. There's no reason for Microsoft to respond, but if anyone
|
||
tests these two compilers side by side drop me a line and let me
|
||
know how they stack up against one another.
|
||
|
||
Borland, incidentally, has been busy the past few months,
|
||
with the release of Eureka, TurboBASIC and TurboC. From what I
|
||
can tell from the ads, Eureka is supposed to be like MathCADD
|
||
(also known only from ads), mainly you enter equations the way
|
||
you wrote them in various math classes and it can solve, graph,
|
||
and do other nice things with the equation. TurboBASIC is a
|
||
competitor to Microsoft's QuickBASIC, which was a response to
|
||
TurboPascal. TurboC is an extension of the idea and it will be
|
||
interesting to see how Microsoft responds to it. If they release
|
||
a Quick C, they may be cutting their profits on their current
|
||
compiler; yet they could lose more sales by not releasing
|
||
anything, and let Borland take some of their C sales. I think
|
||
they'll release a Quick C within the next few months which will
|
||
be very similar to their current C compiler with a few changes.
|
||
Mainly no Codeview, smaller libraries, and a complete
|
||
environment. As to how it will stack up, let's wait and see what
|
||
the reaction is to Turbo C.
|
||
|
||
On the lighter side, I've started playing Leather Goddesses
|
||
of Phobos from Infocom. It's as hilarious as Hitchhiker's and
|
||
possibly even more bizzare! If you liked Hitchhiker's Guide to
|
||
the Galaxy, you will love Leather Goddesses. It's also the first
|
||
adventure I've seen that doesn't assume your gender. Their
|
||
approach to asking you is unique. Very early in the game you must
|
||
visit a restroom, I leave it to the reader to determine how , I
|
||
leave it to the reader to figure out how the game determines your
|
||
sex. There's also three levels of play, varying from something
|
||
you wouldn't mind your five year old playing to lewd, which
|
||
supposedly uses most of George Carlin's seven words you can't say
|
||
on television.
|
||
|
||
The best computer book I've seen in the past few weeks is
|
||
"Supercharging MS-DOS" by Van Wolverton. It is a fairly good
|
||
introduction on what is considered advanced topics by many
|
||
people. It does a very good job of teaching someone about things
|
||
like ANSI.SYS, printer control codes, batch files. You are also
|
||
guided through redefining a key, and how to create your own menu
|
||
system. The book is available from Microsoft Press for $18.95.
|
||
|
||
Once again I welcome your own comments on anything I've
|
||
written about, or something you think I should see (and possibly
|
||
write about). My US mail address is below along with my net/node
|
||
number. If you're a user of a BBS please mention to your sysop
|
||
that mail to me must be routed through either 157/0, 157/502, or
|
||
157/1, he'll understand what that means. Sysop's take note of the
|
||
previous sentence if you send me mail yourself. Those nodes will
|
||
also accept a file for me and are running SEAdog so you shouldn't
|
||
have to worry about mail schedules.
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 14 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Dale Lovell
|
||
3266 Vezber Drive
|
||
Seven Hills, OH 44131
|
||
|
||
usenet: ..!ncoast!lovell
|
||
FidoNet: 157/504
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 15 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
NOTICES
|
||
=================================================================
|
||
|
||
The Interrupt Stack
|
||
|
||
|
||
17 May 1987
|
||
Metro-Fire Fido's Second Birthday BlowOut and Floppy Disk
|
||
Throwing Tournament! All Fido Sysops and Families Invited!
|
||
Contact Christopher Baker at 135/14 for more information.
|
||
|
||
24 Aug 1989
|
||
Voyager 2 passes Neptune.
|
||
|
||
|
||
If you have something which you would like to see on this
|
||
calendar, please send a message to FidoNet node 1/1.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
From the February 9,1987 issue of INFO WORLD.
|
||
|
||
WARNING!
|
||
|
||
Trojan PC-Write Can Trash Your Disk
|
||
|
||
|
||
A system operator of a Los Angeles bulletin board has found a
|
||
bogus version of PC-Write. The "trojan" version, when invoked,
|
||
destroys the fat of a user's hard disk and initiates a low-level
|
||
format, destroying the hard disk's data, according to system
|
||
operator Tom Wilkinson.
|
||
|
||
The bad version of the program masquerades as a "newer" release
|
||
of Version 2.71 and is 98,274 bytes long, said Wilkinson. The
|
||
real Version 2.7 is 98,242 bytes long, and the real Version 2.71
|
||
is 98,644 bytes. The version posted on compuserve is the real
|
||
version, he said. Quicksoft, PC-Write's developer, is offering a
|
||
$2500 reward for the first person who identifies the creator of
|
||
the bogus program and a $5000 reward for the person who provides
|
||
proof that convicts the perpetrator. Those with information can
|
||
contact Quicksoft at (206) 282-0452.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Fidonews Page 16 2 Mar 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
__
|
||
The World's First / \
|
||
BBS Network /|oo \
|
||
* FidoNet * (_| /_)
|
||
_`@/_ \ _
|
||
| | \ \\
|
||
| (*) | \ ))
|
||
______ |__U__| / \//
|
||
/ Fido \ _//|| _\ /
|
||
(________) (_/(_|(____/ (jm)
|
||
|
||
Membership for the International FidoNet Association
|
||
|
||
Membership in IFNA is open to any individual or organization that
|
||
pays an annual specified membership fee. IFNA serves the
|
||
international FidoNet-compatible electronic mail community to
|
||
increase worldwide communications. **
|
||
|
||
Name _________________________________ Date ________
|
||
Address ______________________________
|
||
City & State _________________________
|
||
Country_______________________________
|
||
Phone (Voice) ________________________
|
||
|
||
Net/Node Number ______________________
|
||
Board Name____________________________
|
||
Phone (Data) _________________________
|
||
Baud Rate Supported___________________
|
||
Board Restrictions____________________
|
||
Special Interests_____________________
|
||
______________________________________
|
||
______________________________________
|
||
Is there some area where you would be
|
||
willing to help out in FidoNet?_______
|
||
______________________________________
|
||
______________________________________
|
||
|
||
Send your membership form and a check or money order for $25 to:
|
||
|
||
International FidoNet Association
|
||
P. O. Box 41143
|
||
St Louis, Missouri 63141
|
||
USA
|
||
|
||
Thank you for your membership! Your participation will help to
|
||
insure the future of FidoNet.
|
||
|
||
** Please NOTE that IFNA is a general not-for-profit organization
|
||
in formation and Articles of Association and By-Laws were adopted
|
||
by the membership in January 1987. An Elections Committee has
|
||
been established to fill positions outlined in the By-Laws for
|
||
the Board of Directors. An IFNA Echomail Conference has been
|
||
established on FidoNet to assist the Elections Committee. We
|
||
welcome your input on this Conference.
|
||
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|