147 lines
9.0 KiB
Plaintext
147 lines
9.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
THE "MJ-12" FILE: ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE "SMEAR" REPORT:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It has, unfortunately, been over two months since our last issue of
|
|||
|
"Smear", and in that period of time MUCH has happened regarding the now-
|
|||
|
famous "Majestic-12" or "MJ-12" documents released by Bill Moore and friends
|
|||
|
earlier this year.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Before we move on to a summary of new information, let us mention some-
|
|||
|
thing we neglected to state in our earlier ravings: Apparently long deceased
|
|||
|
Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter was the most important member of this group
|
|||
|
of twelve, because his name comes first on the list (he is referred to as "MJ-
|
|||
|
1") and because he was allegedly the briefing officer who presented this
|
|||
|
startling information to president-elect Dwight Eisenhower on or about Nov.
|
|||
|
18th, 1952. Hillenkoetter, after retirement from his position as first dir-
|
|||
|
ector of the CIA, became a member of the board of directors of NICAP, circa
|
|||
|
1957. Can anyone seriously believe he would have dared to OPENLY join a pro-
|
|||
|
UFO organization if he had the KNOWLEDGE of UFO reality that the "MJ-12"
|
|||
|
briefing document leads us to assume???
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We have already published our exclusive information from Dr. Ernest
|
|||
|
Taves, a very close friend of Dr. Donald Menzel, who apparently was "MJ-10".
|
|||
|
Taves, like others who knew Menzel well, cannot believe that the long-de-
|
|||
|
ceased former director of Harvard Observatory could have had this above-men-
|
|||
|
tioned knowledge of UFO reality and still have written 3 anti-saucer books,
|
|||
|
and still have debunked UFOs emotionally at every opportunity. Yet Moore and
|
|||
|
Friedman see nothing amiss here, and have in fact written long, detailed re-
|
|||
|
buttals re the "Menzel Connection" and all other negative evidence that has
|
|||
|
been brought up in regard to "MJ-12". They do seem to believe what they are
|
|||
|
saying!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CUFOS, in an editorial by Jerry Clark in the May-June issue of the "In-
|
|||
|
ternational UFO Reporter", and in a more recent press release, seems general-
|
|||
|
ly supportive of "MJ-12", and claims that the "verdict is still open."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MUFON has expressed various opinions, swaying pro and con. They used our
|
|||
|
Taves material in a recent issue of their Journal, and in the August issue of
|
|||
|
their Newsletter, edited by MUFON's Massachusetts director James Melesciuc,
|
|||
|
they state: "The results of the MJ-12 circus created by Moore, Shandera and
|
|||
|
Friedman could be detrimental to the future of document research. The hunger
|
|||
|
for publicity or for financial gain by any type of self-styled expert can be
|
|||
|
as damaging to the subject as the crackpots and fanatics. Moore and Friedman,
|
|||
|
of all people, should realize that by promoting evidence loaded with loop-
|
|||
|
holes, will cause people to question the quality of their research and would
|
|||
|
be disastrous to their reputations...."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Needless to say, CSICOP, as personified by Phil Klass, issued a totally
|
|||
|
negative press release, based on insufficient information, in our opinion.
|
|||
|
Much more interesting than the CSICOP release is the September issue of "Just
|
|||
|
Cause", published by Lawrence Fawcett and Barry Greenwood. In an article en-
|
|||
|
titled "The MJ-12 Fiasco," they give a vast amount of detailed negative data
|
|||
|
that no student of this matter should overlook. (Address: P. O. Box 218,
|
|||
|
Coventry, CT., 16238). To this Bill Moore's only comment (to us, by phone)
|
|||
|
is: "Sour Grapes."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Just Cause" introduces into the fray the name of a present or former
|
|||
|
intelligence officer named Richard Doty, assigned to Kirtland Air Force Base,
|
|||
|
New Mexico. The magazine alleges that Doty may very likely be Moore's source.
|
|||
|
Alas, when we said in our last "Smear" that "we believe we have the name of
|
|||
|
the probably perpetrator", it was Doty to whom we were referring. We have
|
|||
|
thus been "scooped", but never mind: Moore admits knowing Doty, but denies
|
|||
|
that Doty is his source. So the mystery deepens!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Phil Klass, relying largely on information from British researcher Chris-
|
|||
|
topher Allan, has made a big deal out of the fact that the "MJ-12" briefing
|
|||
|
paper uses an unusual format in writing the dates, which happens to be ex-
|
|||
|
actly the same unusual format that Bill Moore uses in writing HIS dates. Our
|
|||
|
comment is: Whereas the notorious Straith Letter Hoax of 1957 DID reflect
|
|||
|
Gray Barkers' stylistic peculiarities, since it was written late one drunken
|
|||
|
night with no forethought, Moore would have to be remarkably stupid or insane
|
|||
|
to make such a naive mistake. If the dating similarity means anything, it
|
|||
|
more likely means that the REAL hoaxter was trying deliberately to frame
|
|||
|
Moore!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So, to get to the point: It appears that most thoughtful Ufologists be-
|
|||
|
lieve "MJ-12" is possibly or probably a hoax, and some Ufologists, plus all
|
|||
|
of the debunkers, believe that Moore & Co. are behind it. Our position is
|
|||
|
that, although "MJ-12" is a hoax in all probability, Moore's group is NOT
|
|||
|
behind it. On to our exclusive information:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Your humble "Smear" editor spent large parts of three days with Moore
|
|||
|
and Shandera recently (Sept. 23-25), in Burbank, California, discussing "MJ-
|
|||
|
12" and related topics. We were left with the strong impression that they
|
|||
|
are, if anything VICTIMS of a complex sophisticated hoax that has engulfed
|
|||
|
them for several years - a DISINFORMATION campaign of some sort, for what
|
|||
|
purpose we do not know.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ufologists don't seem to realize that Moore has been involved since 1980
|
|||
|
in the receipt of supposed "inside" government information from first one in-
|
|||
|
formant, and eventually several, on a more or less continuing basis. Like
|
|||
|
"Deep Throat" in the Watergate Scandal, these informants do not always hand
|
|||
|
him answers, but they tell him where to look. As a result, Moore has given up
|
|||
|
his literary career, which looked very promising after the publication of
|
|||
|
"The Roswell Incident" (with Charles Berlitz) in 1980, and has devoted all of
|
|||
|
his spare time to research related to these ufological matters. He earns a
|
|||
|
bare living by selling UFO books and his own tracts by mail order.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Shandera joined Moore in the quest in 1982. He too has largely given up
|
|||
|
his career, which was in film and broadcasting. His financial situation is
|
|||
|
better than Moore's however, as his wife has a very good job in the TV in-
|
|||
|
dustry.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Friedman is, it seems, a more passive partner, in that he is merely kept
|
|||
|
informed of information received by the other two. He continues to work at a
|
|||
|
normal science-related job in his home town in Canada.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Another thing that Ufologists don't seem to realize is that Moore's evi-
|
|||
|
dence consists of a great deal more than what he has released so far. (Appar-
|
|||
|
ently his sources tell him what he can release, and were he to disobey, he
|
|||
|
would blow the whole ongoing relationship.) There are other documents, includ-
|
|||
|
ing one he claims was given to him for exactly 20 minutes to do what he want-
|
|||
|
ed with, and then was taken back. He photographed it and read it into a tape
|
|||
|
recorder, in the presence of the agent who lent it to him.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are also several videotapes. We were allowed to see one 20-minute
|
|||
|
tape and most of another. These consist of a supposed agent talking in a tot-
|
|||
|
ally disguised voice, answering a list of questions from a supposed newsman.
|
|||
|
The agent is disguised, and the newsman has his back to the camera. The prov-
|
|||
|
en identities of these two are known to Moore and Shandera, they say. No one
|
|||
|
was present at the tapings except these two, plus Moore, Shandera, and the
|
|||
|
producer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The contents of the tapes are Way Out - literally and figuratively. We
|
|||
|
have been asked not to print anything about the contents, so we will merely
|
|||
|
comment that we find the material literally incredible without further evi-
|
|||
|
dence to back it up. Moore & Co. apparently have such evidence and expect to
|
|||
|
get more.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The scenario is that by the end of this year, Moore's informants will
|
|||
|
either come forth with more information and public disclosures, or else Moore
|
|||
|
will give up on his informants and go public, himself, with all the inform-
|
|||
|
ation he has obtained so far. In either case, we are in for some interesting
|
|||
|
times!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There is much more to all this, but Space prevents us from rambling fur-
|
|||
|
ther in this issue. Re our continuing "MJ-12" quest: Our sincere thanks to,
|
|||
|
among others, Tommy Roy Blann (who now says he has suddenly withdrawn from
|
|||
|
the UFO field!); to Jim Speiser of ParaNet; to Antonio Huneeus for material
|
|||
|
on the deeply mysterious "Humo Papers" which he has not yet sent (See Next
|
|||
|
Issue!); and to the alleged Space People for making all this madness pos-
|
|||
|
sible.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Also a tip of the "Smear" sombrero to the various zines that have seen
|
|||
|
fit to reprint or condense some of our "MJ-12" material in earlier issues:
|
|||
|
"California UFO"; "Would You Believe?"; "The MUFON Journal"; and (ugh!)
|
|||
|
"Skeptical Inquirer".
|
|||
|
|