60 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
60 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
SOME BASIC PHYSICS ON ELEMENT CREATION
|
|||
|
|
(With a view toward the Robert Lazar UFO Revelations)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Big Bang apparently created only three elements. They
|
|||
|
|
were Hydrogen, Helium and maybe Lithium, and probably some isotopes
|
|||
|
|
of these three like Deuterium, an isotope of Hydrogen. Present
|
|||
|
|
theory is that the "explosion" which also created time and space
|
|||
|
|
was too rapid to create more heavier elements. Those theories
|
|||
|
|
explain very well the observed abundances of Hydrogen & Helium in
|
|||
|
|
the universe today.
|
|||
|
|
When stars finally formed, the second phase of element
|
|||
|
|
creation was started. The heat and pressure at the core of stars
|
|||
|
|
produces higher and higher elements. The energy that the stars
|
|||
|
|
emit, (heat, light, radiation) comes mainly from this elemental
|
|||
|
|
fusion reaction at the core.
|
|||
|
|
Iron is the end however. Because the creation of elements
|
|||
|
|
higher than Iron requires energy input rather than produce energy
|
|||
|
|
output, no significant higher elements are created.
|
|||
|
|
The final phase of element creation occurs in a supernova.
|
|||
|
|
The energy concentration is so great that during the explosion, all
|
|||
|
|
the naturally occurring heavy elements above Iron are created.
|
|||
|
|
This includes the radioactive elements, and almost certainly higher
|
|||
|
|
elements not found naturally on earth. The reason they are not
|
|||
|
|
found on earth is that they have disappeared through radioactive
|
|||
|
|
decay over the 5 billion years the earth has existed.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As for element 115, it remains a real puzzle. If it can be
|
|||
|
|
created
|
|||
|
|
naturally, then a supernova explosion would almost certainly have
|
|||
|
|
created it since they are likely the most energetic entities in the
|
|||
|
|
universe. If if couldn't, then I seriously doubt that technology,
|
|||
|
|
advanced or otherwise, could create it. Since the earth is a
|
|||
|
|
product of star core synthesis as well as supernova synthesis, and
|
|||
|
|
we find no trace of element 115 here, we must form one of the
|
|||
|
|
following two conclusions.
|
|||
|
|
A. Element 115 cannot be created in supernova explosions
|
|||
|
|
which means that it likely does not occur naturally anywhere in the
|
|||
|
|
universe.
|
|||
|
|
B. Element 115 is much more radioactive than Uranium and has
|
|||
|
|
disappeared over the 5 billion year history of the earth.
|
|||
|
|
Conclusion "B" does not necessarily eliminate the use of
|
|||
|
|
element 115 in UFO propulsion. (I am trying to give the
|
|||
|
|
"Revealers" all the slack I can.) Recent "Revelations" indicated
|
|||
|
|
that element 115 is stable inferring that it is not radioactive and
|
|||
|
|
that it occurs naturally in heavy star systems. To a physicist,
|
|||
|
|
heavy element stability usually means that it doesn't radioactively
|
|||
|
|
decay in minute fractions of a second. So, it could be relatively
|
|||
|
|
stable, but still radioactive, enough so that it does not occur
|
|||
|
|
naturally on earth.
|
|||
|
|
The only place that element 115 would occur would be in the
|
|||
|
|
debris of a recent supernova. Recent could mean hours or millions
|
|||
|
|
of years, depending on the stability of the element. Heavy star
|
|||
|
|
systems, or binary stars have no properties that I am aware of that
|
|||
|
|
would make them more likely to contain element 115. Also, there
|
|||
|
|
are no known natural processes occurring in these systems that
|
|||
|
|
could produce element 115.
|
|||
|
|
After the element is created (naturally in a supernova, or
|
|||
|
|
unnaturally in a lab), "ordinary" weight, heat, and pressure (or
|
|||
|
|
lack thereof) would have absolutely no effect on the element.
|
|||
|
|
|