1226 lines
70 KiB
Plaintext
1226 lines
70 KiB
Plaintext
|
SUBJECT: THE PHOENIX PROJECT FROM A GENIE FORUM FILE: UFO2513
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
PART 16
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Filename: Phoeni16.Edi
|
||
|
|
Type : Editorial/Opinion
|
||
|
|
Author : Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
Date : 12/02/92
|
||
|
|
Desc : Editorial on information sent by the Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
concerning the asteroid 1989FC to Steve Jones/Ed Stewart.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study in Discernment
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 1 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I have been interested in the UFO phenomenon for over four decades.
|
||
|
|
All but four months of it, as a reader of books, a dreamer of thoughts,
|
||
|
|
a wonderer of what-ifs, and a debater of hypotheses. One day I saw a
|
||
|
|
message on a local BBS about a trip being organized to the Pilot Peak
|
||
|
|
area to search for a purported "underground UFO base".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I wondered what-if and said why not? I met with the Sacramento UFO
|
||
|
|
Group and together with Steve Jones and three days later with John
|
||
|
|
Pickens from Fresno, I ventured to investigate. Steve Jones and John
|
||
|
|
Pickens both have written trip reports on our quests. I didn't. Their
|
||
|
|
concerns were mine and their reports related what probablly I would
|
||
|
|
have said. We found nothing.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In September, Steve Jones, Mike Mace and myself met with Jack
|
||
|
|
Mathias, the spokesman and Richard Miller, a friend of the Phoenix
|
||
|
|
Group, We met for four hours at the "Ormsby" in Carson City, Nevada. We
|
||
|
|
chatted, traded expectations, and discussed our lack of findings over
|
||
|
|
the K-2 Phoenix Report. We were aware of the Paranet warning over the
|
||
|
|
Phoenix Group and I was particularly concerned over the question. Why
|
||
|
|
Now? Why wait three years to release the reports? We received two
|
||
|
|
different answers. Jack Mathias said he had proded the group to release
|
||
|
|
the information and Richard Miller said he thought the Group was
|
||
|
|
concerned over some possible events that might be occurring "soon". He
|
||
|
|
said he thought it had something to do with a similar incident
|
||
|
|
involving asteroid 1989FC. As an avid amateur astronomer since my early
|
||
|
|
youth, my curiosity was peaked. He would not elaborate and said he
|
||
|
|
would need permission from the Phoenix Group to release the
|
||
|
|
information. If he received the Okay, he would have Jack get us a copy
|
||
|
|
of their findings. A couple of days later the material was downloaded
|
||
|
|
to me.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We read it, checked it out, sought assistance from various sources.
|
||
|
|
Bottom line, it was less verifiable than the original material. At the
|
||
|
|
time, I felt It would have been a dis-service to the UFO community to
|
||
|
|
release it. I felt it was that bad and I still do.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Since then, through the efforts of many on this echo including
|
||
|
|
members of the Sacramento UFO Group that physically visited the site,
|
||
|
|
John Pickens report, Joseph Harris work, and Michael Corbin's initial
|
||
|
|
warning much doubt was placed on the K-2 Report. When Don Kirschner's
|
||
|
|
findings that the K-2 tape was bogus became public, Paranet declared
|
||
|
|
the report a hoax.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I decided to release this part of the investigation that deals with
|
||
|
|
the question why release the reports now? But instead of just releasing
|
||
|
|
Phoenix Project material on 1989FC whole with a warning message to take
|
||
|
|
it with a grain of salt, I have dissected and inserted editorial
|
||
|
|
comments along the way. Hopefuly people will see it for what it is and
|
||
|
|
also hopefully people will be able pick up a pointer here and there and
|
||
|
|
use it in their future research efforts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I don't consider myself the author of the commentary. I have over
|
||
|
|
sixty pages of typewritten commentary on the original material from
|
||
|
|
many, many sources that have contributed. I thank the various members
|
||
|
|
of the Sacramento UFO Group that have contributed and e-mail
|
||
|
|
correspondents on GENIE with special thanks to Art Bozlee and the other
|
||
|
|
Science Round Table sysops that contributed, many of which were never
|
||
|
|
aware of the original Phoenix Project material.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 1: Introductory Note and Header
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 2 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
THE PHOENIX PROJECT
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
09/13/92
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To: Steve Jones
|
||
|
|
From: Staff 1, The Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
Subject: Asteroid 1989FC -- Information requested per conversation
|
||
|
|
of 09/12/92 "Ormsby" meeting.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: You will find this information useful. It will reveal additional
|
||
|
|
insights in regard to our concern re the Alien intentions toward Earth
|
||
|
|
and Humanity. Thank you for meeting with our representatives. Their
|
||
|
|
evaluation of that contact was favorable. They requested this
|
||
|
|
information be forwarded to you. You may use this data at your
|
||
|
|
discretion.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Immediately we are faced with contradictions. The "Privileged
|
||
|
|
Information" header accomplishes three goals:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. It asserts an air of officialness where as we shall see
|
||
|
|
later, none should be asserted.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. Creates the idea that the information that follows is not
|
||
|
|
easily obtained, or from classified sources.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. It becomes an ego boost for the readers by having an
|
||
|
|
important piece of "Privileged Information" personally
|
||
|
|
addressed to them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The last sentence nullifies the "Privileged Information" designation.
|
||
|
|
As of this point, all information becomes public release. This is out
|
||
|
|
of character for anyone with a background in intelligence. So right off
|
||
|
|
the bat we know that "Staff 1" in all probability is not an
|
||
|
|
intelligence operative or ever was.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "From: Staff 1 Phoenix Project:" header accomplishes the following:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Polarization around a singular, mysterious and/or
|
||
|
|
inaccessible leadership. Only select individuals may be
|
||
|
|
granted access to this person known only as "Staff 1".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. But since the mysterious "Staff 1" has taken the reader into
|
||
|
|
his confidence by making him privy to "Privileged"
|
||
|
|
documentation and establishing the fact that the reader can
|
||
|
|
be trusted, why then is this mysterious leader referring to
|
||
|
|
himself as "Staff 1"?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. It is a psychological ego boost to have documentation
|
||
|
|
addressed by the top authoritive figure of the group. Keep
|
||
|
|
this in mind as we go through the documentation.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "Note:" paragraph accomplishes the following:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. "Thank you for meeting with our representatives."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
a. This reaffirms the inaccessibility of "Staff 1".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
b. This reaffirms the authority and rank of "Staff 1",
|
||
|
|
thereby putting the reader in the subjective and
|
||
|
|
subordinate posture.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. "Their evaluation of that contact was favorable."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
a. This is an ego boost...a pat in the back if you
|
||
|
|
will.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
b. Also a subtle manipulation of the reader, but
|
||
|
|
nonetheless a manipulation.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
c. The group has cracked the door open for the reader.
|
||
|
|
They evaluated you and you have been found
|
||
|
|
acceptable to them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. "You may use this data at your own discretion."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
a. As stated above, a contradiction. Information is no
|
||
|
|
longer privileged.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
b. This also makes "Privileged Information" nothing but
|
||
|
|
a ploy or tease.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
c. The reader now has to decide as to whether or not to
|
||
|
|
accept the mission. Even though none is specifically
|
||
|
|
stated this introductory material has been carefully
|
||
|
|
constructed to imply dissimination. What would you
|
||
|
|
do with the information that follows? Would you
|
||
|
|
immediately re-broadcast it throughout the echoes?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
d. The seduction has been set. The bait is in place.
|
||
|
|
Will you be pulled in? Just nibble? Or ignore it?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 2: The Initial "Privileged Information"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 3 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
DATE:
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Launch & Mission Schedule
|
||
|
|
TOPIC:
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: NASA
|
||
|
|
LOCATION:
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1989 3/13/89 Discovery: KSC, STS-29, TDRS-4 & Photo Recon of Earth
|
||
|
|
1989 4/29/89 Atlantis: KSC, STS-30, ABORT: Magellan Probe
|
||
|
|
1989 5/4/89 Atlantis: KSC, STS-30, Launch: Magellan Venus Probe
|
||
|
|
1989 5/20/89 DOD Launch, Vandenberg, Navigation Satellite
|
||
|
|
1989 6/10/89 DOD Launch, KSC, Nav-Sat., Delta 2 Rocket
|
||
|
|
1989 6/14/89 DOD Launch, KSC, Early Warning Sat., Thor Rocket
|
||
|
|
1989 8/8/89 DOD Launch, KSC, Columbia: Spy Sat & SDI
|
||
|
|
1989 8/14/89 DOD Launch, KSC, ABORTED: Delta-2 Rocket, Nav. Sat.
|
||
|
|
1989 8/18/89 DOD Launch, KSC, The above 8/14/89 DOD Sat launched.
|
||
|
|
1989 October Return of Asteroid 1989FC - Crossing Earth's orbit
|
||
|
|
1989 October Atlantis: Galileo Probe to Jupiter
|
||
|
|
1989 10/21/89 DOD Launch, KSC, Delta-1 Rocket, Navstar Sat.
|
||
|
|
1989 November Comm Satellite Launch
|
||
|
|
1990 Gamma Ray Observatory
|
||
|
|
1990 Space Telescope
|
||
|
|
1990 October - Sun Probe
|
||
|
|
1992 Mars Observer Mission: The United States plans to
|
||
|
|
send up an orbiting satellite
|
||
|
|
in 1992, called the Mars
|
||
|
|
Observer.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NASA also is making tentative plans for a 1998 mission that would send
|
||
|
|
a land rover to explore the planet for a year, collecting rock and soil
|
||
|
|
samples. A spacecraft would return the samples to Earth.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
EOF
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
First of all, nothing is "Privileged" about the above information. It
|
||
|
|
is simply a run of NASA launches that can be gotten by anyone that buys
|
||
|
|
a paper, watches TV, has access to NASA-SELECT Cable, or uses a modem
|
||
|
|
like you are right now to access one of the many echoes available to
|
||
|
|
the public.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A very subtle, even maybe subliminal manipulation of the reader
|
||
|
|
though is attempted---blank categories up at the header information.
|
||
|
|
"Necessary" informational categories have been left out. This is one of
|
||
|
|
two things. It is either out of character and sloppy for someone,
|
||
|
|
"Staff 1", that is supposed to have gleaned "Privileged Information"
|
||
|
|
through unidentified field operatives from NASA, or it was purposely
|
||
|
|
omitted thus making the "Privileged Information classification a
|
||
|
|
"ploy", or "tease".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also, we have a very pertinent piece of information in the schedule
|
||
|
|
missing: The discovery and original earth-orbit crossing of 1989 FC.
|
||
|
|
Remember? That is why we are being fed all this privileged information.
|
||
|
|
That date is important because later it will establish a major
|
||
|
|
contradiction to the scenario presented by the "Phoenix Project".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 3: What You Read Might Not Be What You See
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 4 of 14
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Asteroid
|
||
|
|
TOPIC: 1989FC
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: New York Times, AP News Service - and others
|
||
|
|
LOCATION: Earth
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS: In cosmic terms, it was a close call. The object, named
|
||
|
|
1989FC, presumed to be a large asteroid capable of wreaking
|
||
|
|
widespread destruction in a collision with Earth passed
|
||
|
|
within a half million miles of Earth, (a near-miss in cosmic
|
||
|
|
terms) the closest approach of such an object in the last 50
|
||
|
|
years.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The asteroid, a collection of rock and dust half a mile or more in
|
||
|
|
diameter, crossed Earth's orbit undetected March 23, in what is
|
||
|
|
presumed to be one of its annual passes near Earth.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It was discovered by Dr. Henry Holt, the Northern Arizona University
|
||
|
|
astrogeologist and astronomer, in photographs taken March 31, using the
|
||
|
|
18-inch Schmidt telescope at Mt. Palomar Observatory.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scientists later calculated that the asteroid, traveling at 46,000
|
||
|
|
miles and hour, is orbiting the Sun once a year on an erratic
|
||
|
|
elliptical path that brings it back every seven months toward Earth.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"It can come this close or closer in the future. When two objects are
|
||
|
|
in overlapping orbits, the bigger one inevitably pulls the smaller one
|
||
|
|
into its path. Sooner or later it will collide with the Earth, the moon
|
||
|
|
or Mars," said Dr. Holt.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Dr. Brevan French, an advanced program scientist with NASA, said that
|
||
|
|
if 1989FC collides with the Earth, the impact would be equivalent to
|
||
|
|
the explosion of 20,000 one-megaton hydrogen bombs. A megaton is the
|
||
|
|
explosive power of one million tons of TNT. French, NASA's expert on
|
||
|
|
large space objects in the solar system, said that such an impact would
|
||
|
|
dig a crater a mile deep and five to 10 miles wide. "Landing in an
|
||
|
|
ocean would be even more destructive," he said. "Depending on the depth
|
||
|
|
of the water, angle of entry and size, and speed, it could create tidal
|
||
|
|
waves several hundred meters high. Waves that large could sweep over
|
||
|
|
coastal areas, causing wide-spread destruction." If 1989FC hits the
|
||
|
|
Earth, the odds are that it will hit an ocean.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
EOF
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
July 1989 Follow Up Story -- Popular Science: July 1989, P13.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Subsequent observations by Holt and other astronomers pegged the
|
||
|
|
asteroids speed at 46,000 mph and determined its orbit is highly
|
||
|
|
elliptical and erratic. It will cross Earth's orbit again in October
|
||
|
|
1989, but at a greater distance than the 500,000 miles of its last
|
||
|
|
encounter in March. This was the closest call of any Earth-crossing
|
||
|
|
object since asteroid Hermes in 1937, which passed at about the same
|
||
|
|
distance.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Many scientists believe that periodic collisions with asteroids or
|
||
|
|
comets have caused repeated mass extinctions on Earth, including one
|
||
|
|
about 65 million years ago alleged to be responsible for the
|
||
|
|
disappearance of the dinosaurs.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Again, we are provided with information that has been gleamed, this
|
||
|
|
time from the NY Times and Popular Mechanics---nothing "Privileged"
|
||
|
|
about it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On the surface it looks inocuous, but we are again manipulated,
|
||
|
|
gently, subtly and maybe even subliminally. Notice the header date,
|
||
|
|
3/23/89, the same date that the asteroid crossed Earth's orbit
|
||
|
|
UNDETECTED. Obviously, it was not the date of the NY Times article.
|
||
|
|
Also, notice that now we are also provided the "Privileged" information
|
||
|
|
of the location of this source in the header: "Location: Earth"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I point out these things because the reader's mind, subconsciously is
|
||
|
|
picking all of this up, recording it and without the conscious mind
|
||
|
|
awake, these subtle data points have no reference of true or false.
|
||
|
|
This makes it easier for someone to convince the reader that the whole
|
||
|
|
"scenario" makes sense and has validity. Be aware and pay attention to
|
||
|
|
what you read and question it, before you accept the veracity of what
|
||
|
|
is being told. Even in presenting a truth, someone with an agenda can
|
||
|
|
manipulate a person's mind without them being aware unless you exercise
|
||
|
|
critical analysis in your thinking.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also, ask why are these sources being presented? Why media sources
|
||
|
|
and not the actual IAU circulars, or the scientist's press releases to
|
||
|
|
the media? The media will edit, rewrite and sometimes leave out
|
||
|
|
important information and sometimes even produce erroneous information.
|
||
|
|
The NY Times article first tells us 1989FC makes a presumed pass every
|
||
|
|
year. Two paragraphs later we are told once every seven months. So what
|
||
|
|
is it then? Is the article reliable? Or was it just in a hurry to get
|
||
|
|
to press? Does the Popular Mechanics article provide us with any new
|
||
|
|
"Privileged" information? No. Its purpose here is to intensify the
|
||
|
|
hype, placed here to manipulate the reader once again.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Never take the media source for your prime source of information. Go
|
||
|
|
to the actual source. Maybe what we are seeing here is the prime source
|
||
|
|
for the "Phoenix Project", not the purported contacts they say they
|
||
|
|
have within the intelligence community and inside "mysterious"
|
||
|
|
government agencies.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 4: The Seduction Continues
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 5 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
At this point, in the Phoenix Project file received, was a copy of an
|
||
|
|
article that appeared in Flying Saucer Review:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The End Of A Chapter?"
|
||
|
|
FSR (Vol.34, No.3, Sept., 1989)
|
||
|
|
by FSR Editor Gordon Creighton
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Due to the lenght of the article I am omitting most of it and only
|
||
|
|
including that part which deals with 1989FC. For those that might be
|
||
|
|
interested in the full article, it is available as ASTEROID.ZIP at your
|
||
|
|
favorite BBS across the country that have UFO related files. In essence
|
||
|
|
the article discusses catastrophism and our fragile existence as
|
||
|
|
related to the geological record.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
End of commentary
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
From "The End of A Chapter?" material from received Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
file:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But now (Daily Telegraph, April 21, 1989) we learn that our Earth has
|
||
|
|
just narrowly escaped being struck by a fresh, totally unknown,
|
||
|
|
asteroid (1989FC) weighing some 400,000,000 tons, which passed within
|
||
|
|
half-a-million miles of us in March of this year!
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Dr. Henry Holt, the Northern Arizona University astronomer who
|
||
|
|
discovered this "beastie", using the Mount Palomar Optical Telescope,
|
||
|
|
says that the thing had come in from the direction of the Sun, so that
|
||
|
|
the Sun's glare had prevented anyone from detecting its approach
|
||
|
|
sooner, and that, "If it had appeared only a few hours earlier, it
|
||
|
|
would have nailed us."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Half-a-million miles from Earth" mean that, as it passed us, the
|
||
|
|
size of the gap separating the asteroid from us was only twice the
|
||
|
|
distance from the Earth to the Moon.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
By this time I am wondering what kind of hold that "Staff 1" has over
|
||
|
|
Jack Mathias and Richard Miller? For Richard Miller to have to ask
|
||
|
|
permission to release this kind of "Privileged" information? But most
|
||
|
|
importantly, this article offers us a new piece of information that
|
||
|
|
will in itself cast serious doubt on the scenario that the Phoenix
|
||
|
|
Project will soon "reveal", the direction that 1989FC encountered
|
||
|
|
earth's orbit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
End of commentary
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
DATE: 4/29/89
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Magellan Venus Probe
|
||
|
|
TOPIC: Launch abort, Mission STS-30
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: AP Wire
|
||
|
|
LOCATION: KSC
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS: The space shuttle Atlantis, which came within 31 seconds of
|
||
|
|
liftoff Friday, could remain grounded until late next week,
|
||
|
|
space officials said.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Controllers scrubbed the launch when they detected an electrical
|
||
|
|
surge in a main engine fuel pump. Launch director Bob Sieck said it
|
||
|
|
will be at least Monday before a second launch can be tried, and he
|
||
|
|
termed that timetable "optimistic" after saying NASA was also checking
|
||
|
|
on an unexpected "vapor cloud" that emerged around a hydrogen fuel
|
||
|
|
line.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: Both of the above excuses were a cover story. The delay was
|
||
|
|
needed to re-program Magellan's computers so it could track 1989FC when
|
||
|
|
launched, and then continue on its Venus mission.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NASA has a nice, long, launch window, until May 28 to get Magellan on
|
||
|
|
its way. NASA personnel will inspect the Atlantis shuttle over the
|
||
|
|
weekend. Liftoff could be delayed well into next week if the fuel pump
|
||
|
|
or the fuel line has to be replaced.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
First we have a very not-so-subtle manipulation. A Note: inserted
|
||
|
|
right in the middle of the AP story. Please note that it is not a
|
||
|
|
"Staff 1 note" or a "Phoenix Project" note, but just a note. It is
|
||
|
|
possible that a reader not paying attention, could mistake it for part
|
||
|
|
of the AP story itself.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But what of these claims the note makes? It is full of
|
||
|
|
contradictions. First of all, there was no need to delay a launch to
|
||
|
|
re-program Magellan's Computers. If "Staff 1" had simple access to
|
||
|
|
NASA-SELECT Cable TV or if any of the Phoenix Project "Operatives"
|
||
|
|
lightly followed NASA projects, they would know that Magellan's onboard
|
||
|
|
computers could be easily programmed remotely whether on the ground or
|
||
|
|
in flight.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also, notice that the launch was stopped 31 seconds before liftoff.
|
||
|
|
This is April 29, 1989. Knowledge of 1989FC was known to science at
|
||
|
|
least since the release of IAU Circular 4767 dated April 7, 1989 so we
|
||
|
|
know that the actual discovery was made before April 7. But without any
|
||
|
|
substantiation at all "Staff 1" wants us to believe that NASA would
|
||
|
|
risk a one billion dollar project almost down to the wire, 31 seconds
|
||
|
|
before lift-off to "reprogram" its computers---when it had the
|
||
|
|
knowledge of 1989FCs existence and the time to do it for almost an
|
||
|
|
entire month.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also, remember that all this time that Magellan is on the ground,
|
||
|
|
1989FC is zip-a-doing away at the speed of 46,000 miles an hour away
|
||
|
|
from Magellan and the Earth going in the other direction---making the
|
||
|
|
task of tracking it that much difficult if it could even do it. Well,
|
||
|
|
we already suspected that "Staff 1" had very little knowledge or
|
||
|
|
experience as an intelligence operative, now it appears that "Staff 1"
|
||
|
|
also has very little knowledge of NASA operations, capabilities and
|
||
|
|
programs.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 5: "Staff 1's" Resume Gathers Points
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 6 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
DATE: 4/28/89
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Magellan Venus Probe
|
||
|
|
TOPIC: Shuttle Atlantis, Mission STS-30
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: AP Wire
|
||
|
|
LOCATION: KSC
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS: Lennard Fisk, NASA's chief scientist, said the launch of the
|
||
|
|
explorer craft Magellan will mark "a resurgence of America's
|
||
|
|
planetary program." The last American probe sent to deep
|
||
|
|
space was the Pioneer-Venus dispatched in 1978. Magellan is
|
||
|
|
to be released from Atlantis' cargo bay six hours after
|
||
|
|
launch and sent streaking on a 15-month, 806-million mile
|
||
|
|
trip of its own. Magellan will be carrying some of the most
|
||
|
|
sophisticated remote mapping sensors ever sent to another
|
||
|
|
planet. An imaging radar system will be able to detect
|
||
|
|
features on the surface as small as 100 yards, about the size
|
||
|
|
of a football field. The radar will be operated during almost
|
||
|
|
2,000 passes over the Venusian surface, each time viewing a
|
||
|
|
slice of the planet and then sending the images back to Earth
|
||
|
|
for computer enhancements. Magellan is expected to map about
|
||
|
|
90 percent of the surface while orbiting Venus for about 243
|
||
|
|
Earth days, equal to a single Venus day.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
EOF
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
DATE: 5/6/89
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Magellan Venus Probe
|
||
|
|
TOPIC: Shuttle Atlantis, Mission STS-30
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: AP Wire
|
||
|
|
LOCATION: KSC
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS: Follow on story:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The 7600-pound Magellan probe launched late Thursday, was more than
|
||
|
|
175,000 miles from the shuttle Atlantis by late Friday afternoon. Its
|
||
|
|
initial speed of 25,000 mph has slowed gradually to a cruising speed of
|
||
|
|
about 7,000 mph. As it nears its target in August 1990 the tug of the
|
||
|
|
Venusian gravity will increase its speed to 25,000 mph again.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NASA reported the Magellan was off course by a small amount, but this
|
||
|
|
was not unexpected. On May 21, a ground station will send a signal to
|
||
|
|
trigger a small motor firing to adjust the course.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: It was "off course" because Magellan and its sophisticated radar
|
||
|
|
capability was tracking 1989FC, in an attempt to determine its exact
|
||
|
|
orbit so its return and possible collision with Earth could be
|
||
|
|
predicted.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For those of you that follow NASA, you know that NASA issues daily
|
||
|
|
reports and updates on all ongoing NASA projects. Here we have two hand
|
||
|
|
picked reports 8 days apart. A warning bell should go off. Why these
|
||
|
|
two reports and not others?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Again, we have a very subtle deception in the above two pieces of
|
||
|
|
"Privileged" information provided by "Staff 1". The first AP wire
|
||
|
|
addresses the capabilities of the onboard Magellan computers and it
|
||
|
|
certainly appears that they are capable of tremendous feats and that
|
||
|
|
they are, manipulating the reader into believing that they can do
|
||
|
|
anything. But there is one exception. They only work on Venus. The
|
||
|
|
sensor, mapping and radar devices on Magellan were designed and
|
||
|
|
calibrated to be used only on Venus and only a limited range of orbital
|
||
|
|
altitutes were available for collection of mapping data. For Magellan
|
||
|
|
to work and do its job, it had to be in close proximity to Venus. For
|
||
|
|
the most part, this wonderful computer equipment had to wait until
|
||
|
|
Magellan achieved a Venus orbit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the 2nd AP wire story again we have the intrusion of the non-
|
||
|
|
identity "note". But what about its claim? Do you recall the date of
|
||
|
|
its closest approach to earth orbit? March 23, 1989. For 43 days now,
|
||
|
|
1989 FC has been streaking away from us at 46,000 miles per hour. By
|
||
|
|
this time, it isn't even close anymore or for that matter, in the same
|
||
|
|
part of the Solar System as Earth or Magellan. The "Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
operatives" and "Staff 1" also forget that Magellan slowed down to
|
||
|
|
7,000 mph. Each hour that goes by, 1989FC is getting further and
|
||
|
|
further away making its tracking (if it was so) that more difficult if
|
||
|
|
not impossible.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Now wait a minute? What about the off-course claim? Yes, it was off
|
||
|
|
course. But what "Staff 1" didn't know is that the booster used, the
|
||
|
|
IUS, is solid fueled. With solid fuel you can not test the motor
|
||
|
|
beforehand. Thus it isn't uncommon to have to tweak the trajectory to
|
||
|
|
compensate for these slight variations. The total delta vee (an
|
||
|
|
engineers shorthand way of saying the change of velocity) of the tweak
|
||
|
|
was only a few feet per second, a very small value indeed. Which kind
|
||
|
|
of puts the damper on "Staff 1" and the whole "off exploring the
|
||
|
|
asteroid" caper.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Again, it appears that the only things that "Staff 1" and the
|
||
|
|
"Phoenix Project operatives" really know and understand about NASA
|
||
|
|
operations, comes from a cursory look at what the AP wire puts out.
|
||
|
|
Which leads me to wonder, if the information they say they have access
|
||
|
|
to is not coming from the "inside", where is it coming from?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 6: "Staff 1" Re-asserts Himself
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 7 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
YEAR: 1989
|
||
|
|
DATE: 4/26/89
|
||
|
|
CATEGORY: Project Zeus - SDI
|
||
|
|
TOPIC: Magellan Probe - Shuttle Atlantis, Mission STS-30
|
||
|
|
SOURCE: AP Wire: Cape Canaveral, FL.
|
||
|
|
LOCATION: KSC
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
COMMENTS: The Atlantis commander says his crew is "mighty proud" to be
|
||
|
|
part of the first space shuttle planetary mission scheduled
|
||
|
|
to blast- off this Friday. The countdown, which started
|
||
|
|
Tuesday, continued toward a liftoff at 2:24 p.m. Friday.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Six hours after launch, astronauts Mark Lee and Mary Cleave are to
|
||
|
|
release the 7,600-pound Magellan probe and a rocket to propel it on a
|
||
|
|
468-day journey to Venus.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Magellan is to reach its destination in August 1990, swooping into
|
||
|
|
orbit around Venus to begin a 243-day period during which it is to map
|
||
|
|
up to 90 percent of the cloud-shrouded planet's surface with the
|
||
|
|
probe's high resolution radar system.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"We're not really in charge of the deep space probe," said Commander
|
||
|
|
David Walker. "We're fortunate enough to be part of the team that gets
|
||
|
|
to send it up there. The rest of the NASA team will make sure that it
|
||
|
|
gets to Venus and does its job."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
UPDATE: NASA, KSC Release # 24-89, March 1989
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Magellan marks the first U.S. planetary mission since Pioneer Venus
|
||
|
|
12 in 1978. It also kicks off a core program of solar system
|
||
|
|
exploration involving NASA and organizations from the United States and
|
||
|
|
the international community.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Project Zeus: One of the payload experiments includes the Mesoscale
|
||
|
|
Lighting Experiment, a NASA sponsored effort involving several
|
||
|
|
universities. Its objective is to study the visual characteristics of
|
||
|
|
large scale lighting in the upper atmosphere. (part of the Project Zeus
|
||
|
|
effort to study laser beam diffusion in the upper atmosphere).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In addition, as another experiment, "The Shuttle Atlantis will act as
|
||
|
|
a calibration point for a third experiment involving the Air Force Maui
|
||
|
|
Optical System Facility in Hawaii."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Phoenix Project Note: Project Zeus - SDI Experiment. Although
|
||
|
|
unstated in this NASA Release, Atlantis is acting as an orbital mirror
|
||
|
|
being tracked by the Air Force facility (SDI ground based laser
|
||
|
|
facility) named in the above paragraph.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Here now for the first time we see "Phoenix Project Note", no longer
|
||
|
|
"Note", no more need to pussy foot around, time to reaffirm(see
|
||
|
|
commentary in Part 1). Ask yourself if your heart didn't pump a little
|
||
|
|
bit faster when you read "Phoenix Project Note"? Why did it? Because
|
||
|
|
even though you are being walked through this, your subconscious is
|
||
|
|
reacting to the manipulative techniques exposed so far.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We went from the initial strong manipulative Introduction which
|
||
|
|
established the subordinate/authority relation between the reader and
|
||
|
|
"Staff 1", through a series of non-identity notes and now we are coming
|
||
|
|
back where the authority is once again emerging.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But what about the Phoenix Project Note? What does it really mean?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. "Staff 1" alludes that he is providing us with "Privileged
|
||
|
|
Information", hidden knowledge that NASA is not telling the
|
||
|
|
reader.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. Also he introduces a new player in the game---SDI experiment.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. "Staff 1" has raised the stakes! Another sinister element.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But, is it really sinister? Is NASA not telling us something? Do we
|
||
|
|
really have a new player in the game?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
First of all, the source we are being quoted is once again an AP
|
||
|
|
wire. Doesn't "Staff 1" know that NASA releases detailed mission
|
||
|
|
profiles on shuttle missions? Available to anyone that wants one. And
|
||
|
|
if it indeed does have a classified DOD mission, it says so. This
|
||
|
|
ladies and gentlemen, is a classified DOD mission or experiment. Each
|
||
|
|
shuttle mission carries an array of experiments and projects. The
|
||
|
|
shuttle is often used as a tracking target for a number of earth and
|
||
|
|
space based photo recon and optical tracking systems as its orbit is
|
||
|
|
VERY WELL known, and the optical characteristics of the spacecraft are
|
||
|
|
well understood. Thus many systems use it as a passive target test.
|
||
|
|
Nothing sinister here.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 7: And Now For The Rest Of The Story
|
||
|
|
The footnotes will be addressed later
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 8 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: The following data was provided The Phoenix Project by
|
||
|
|
(concerned) sources within the U.S. Intelligence community. See
|
||
|
|
comments in numbered footnotes.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Year: 1990
|
||
|
|
To: The Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
Excerpt:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
...Start:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
a) "The Greys are actively engaged in a wide variety of attention
|
||
|
|
diverting operations on a world-wide scale. Their operations are
|
||
|
|
to delay the SDI program, and human counter-measures against
|
||
|
|
them.(1) The operations are designed to re-direct and drain
|
||
|
|
humanities resources in futile attempts to deal with an endless
|
||
|
|
series of new, urgent, and continually developing problems.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Serious events will occur with overwhelming regularity with a
|
||
|
|
projected peak in the latter half of 1992.(2) The problems
|
||
|
|
confronting all humanity are rapidly reaching the saturation
|
||
|
|
level. Their enormous quantity threatening to "overload"
|
||
|
|
humanities ability to deal with them.(3) The inevitable result
|
||
|
|
when this occurs, will be the collapse of civilized society -- a
|
||
|
|
prime objective of the Greys.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Humanity is directly responsible for the greatest number of their
|
||
|
|
overwhelming problems -- for all the reasons intelligent men have
|
||
|
|
warned about. The Greys are using human greed, ambition and
|
||
|
|
weakness, and lust for power, against humanity. This is an
|
||
|
|
indication of "their" intelligence."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
b) "The alien beings from Zeta Reticulum (the Greys) have become
|
||
|
|
aware that the U.S. and USSR are deploying a major weapons system
|
||
|
|
for use against them. (The SDI, Star Wars system).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"With the resumption of NASA's Shuttle Program, on September 29,
|
||
|
|
1988, after the lengthy delay caused by the "Challenger" disaster,
|
||
|
|
the U.S. has made a frantic effort to launch secret SDI payloads
|
||
|
|
into orbit. This increased activity has alarmed the Greys.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The Greys, know it is only a matter of time before SDI (Star
|
||
|
|
Wars) becomes fully operational and can be used against them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Please note the added quotes, yet not one direct source cited. Also,
|
||
|
|
this alleged information is provided by not just intelligence members,
|
||
|
|
but "concerned" intelligence members. The quotes provide a subtle
|
||
|
|
accent of authenticity where none exists. By differentiating and
|
||
|
|
stating "concerned", "Staff 1" implies division within the ranks of
|
||
|
|
intelligence. The good guys vrs. the bad guys. The good guys like
|
||
|
|
"Staff 1" and his group the Phoenix Project. Somewhere along the line
|
||
|
|
the "good intelligence guys" feel that "Staff 1" is somehow empowered
|
||
|
|
to do something about this.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But wait a minute! Why are they giving "Staff 1" the lowdown? If they
|
||
|
|
are really "concerned", wouldn't they give this information to someone
|
||
|
|
that could really take care of the "threat"? Not some obscure group no
|
||
|
|
one ever heard of before? Could it be that "Staff 1" is somekind of
|
||
|
|
powerhouse in disguise? We know he does not have a background in
|
||
|
|
intelligence. We know he doesn't know anything about NASA. What is it
|
||
|
|
that the "good intelligence guys" know that we don't?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But what is it that "Staff 1" is really saying here?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. That the grays are going to kick our ass.
|
||
|
|
2. That the world is going to come to an end.
|
||
|
|
3. That we are on the verge of not having a leader.
|
||
|
|
4. That it is our own fault.
|
||
|
|
5. That the grays know us real well and our human weaknesses.
|
||
|
|
6. And therefore the grays are "really" smart.
|
||
|
|
7. But wait! The grays have a fear. SDI
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But if the grays are "really" smart, capable of travelling all the
|
||
|
|
way here from Zeta Reticuli, using technologies hundreds if not
|
||
|
|
thousands of years ahead of us that we have no clues about, and not
|
||
|
|
giving a hoot about all the nuclear armaments stockpiled & deployed
|
||
|
|
over forty-five years, why would they fear something that is no more
|
||
|
|
than a SMART SPEAR? Now, I am no Columbo. I really need some help on
|
||
|
|
this one folks.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But so far all we have seen is subtle posturing and manipulation
|
||
|
|
coupled with doses of hysteria and paranoia with the hint that "Staff
|
||
|
|
1" might be some real "powerhouse" capable of taking us under his wing.
|
||
|
|
Never mind that so far everything he has told us simply doesn't check
|
||
|
|
out. That is not the point. The point is that there is no one else
|
||
|
|
around. Now, I am no Columbo, but it seems to me that just maybe this
|
||
|
|
"Staff 1" needs to be given a second look.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 8: There is help on the way
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 9 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: The following data is known by MAJI and a select few in the
|
||
|
|
Intelligence Community.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Re: The Greys
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"To delay the SDI effort the Greys conceived a masterful plan. A plan
|
||
|
|
to create the greatest delay possible. A delay that would insure their
|
||
|
|
development of a counter weapon and also allow them to gain greater
|
||
|
|
control over human society.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Their plan was to create a major catastrophe, seemingly natural in
|
||
|
|
occurrence, which would require the full attention and resources of
|
||
|
|
humanity to cope with. A diversionary tactic so vast, in scope, that
|
||
|
|
the U.S. and USSR would have little time or the resources to deploy
|
||
|
|
SDI.
|
||
|
|
"This was their plan:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"In early 1989, two of the Grey's spacecraft entered the Asteroid
|
||
|
|
Belt between Mars and Jupiter. There, they selected an asteroid (later
|
||
|
|
named 1989FC) over a half-mile in diameter. They nudged this asteroid
|
||
|
|
into position. Then, sent it hurtling on a collision course with Earth.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Their well-planned catastrophe would occur when it struck the Earth
|
||
|
|
several months later. World governments would, then, divert their
|
||
|
|
efforts to the immediate tragic events. The Greys would gain the
|
||
|
|
additional delay they needed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The nature and consequences of this remarkable and deadly event, are
|
||
|
|
evidence that the Grey's feel seriously threatened by the SDI Weapons
|
||
|
|
System and that they are capable of creating widespread destruction.
|
||
|
|
The death of thousands of humans is of little consequence to them. They
|
||
|
|
are determined to subjugate the Earth and enslave human society. Any
|
||
|
|
act needed to accomplish this is acceptable to them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The Greys are still wondering why their asteroid (1989FC) missed the
|
||
|
|
Earth. They are unaware that it was diverted by (name deleted)."(4)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
End of Excerpt
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Excuse me one moment "Staff 1". Did you say they nudged it into place
|
||
|
|
and then sent it hurtling towards Earth? I am sorry. I knew I
|
||
|
|
misunderstood. MAJI and select few within the intelligence community
|
||
|
|
said that. That makes me feel much, much better. I have seen Mighty
|
||
|
|
Mouse do that on Saturday Mornings.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But you see, "Staff 1", there is something that you forgot about
|
||
|
|
while you were trying to catch up on how intelligence operatives and
|
||
|
|
NASA operations work. It is called orbital mechanics. To change the
|
||
|
|
orbit of an object you have to consult Isaac Newton first. I also
|
||
|
|
suspect that a spacefaring race like the grays, would also know all
|
||
|
|
about orbital mechanics. Point and shove simply doesn't wash at all.
|
||
|
|
Also, if I recall from the earlier factual AP wires you were so kind to
|
||
|
|
provide me. Asteroid 1989FC approached Earth's orbit from the direction
|
||
|
|
of the Sun. I know that is just a minor technicality but maybe it is
|
||
|
|
worth noting.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I am sorry. I didn't hear you. You say to read the last paragraph of
|
||
|
|
the MAJI posting? (name deleted) diverted 1989FC? And the grays are
|
||
|
|
scratching their heads? Trying to figure out what went wrong?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But, now I am really confused. Didn't you just tell us that the grays
|
||
|
|
were really "smart"? There is someone smarter? (name deleted) is
|
||
|
|
smarter. And the grays with all their might, don't have a clue as to
|
||
|
|
who (name deleted) is? But MAJI and a few select members of the
|
||
|
|
intelligence community know who (name deleted) is. I assume that
|
||
|
|
you,"Staff 1", also knows who (name deleted) is?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 9: Is Their a case of footpowder in the Echo-PLEASE?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 10 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
FOOTNOTES:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. The Shuttle Challenger disaster. Grey directed sabotage -- to delay
|
||
|
|
the deployment of the SDI weapons system by halting the space
|
||
|
|
program. A two year delay was accomplished. This sabotage was
|
||
|
|
revealed in the U.S. Senate Investigation of the Challenger Shuttle
|
||
|
|
disaster. Expert testimony, revealed in the Senate investigation,
|
||
|
|
disclosed the presence of tiny "knife-like" cuts in the rubber "O"
|
||
|
|
Rings between booster sections. This damaging testimony was openly
|
||
|
|
revealed in the televised Senate hearing. However, the source of the
|
||
|
|
sabotage was not revealed and the subject was quickly changed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MAJI determined the sabotage was carried out by an inspector at
|
||
|
|
Morton- Thiokol's Utah plant and by a contractor's worker at Kennedy
|
||
|
|
Space Center. MAJI investigators, later, apprehended both
|
||
|
|
individuals. Examination and interrogation revealed that both had
|
||
|
|
"implants" and were under the Grey's mental control. Both men have
|
||
|
|
disappeared from public view.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I used to work on the STS program as well as Art Bozlee, the
|
||
|
|
Aerospace Science SYSOPS on Genie where most of this information comes
|
||
|
|
from. If the Challenger accident was an act of sabotage why are there
|
||
|
|
NO records of the committee meetings? Even secret testimony has a
|
||
|
|
public date. The dates are a matter of public record. Only the records
|
||
|
|
would be secret. The fact the Senate met to investigate Challenger
|
||
|
|
would be in the public record. All the meetings are known, and the
|
||
|
|
record is in the public domain through the Congressional Record. There
|
||
|
|
was no secret testimony. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There were cuts in some of the SRB O-rings caused by hot gas erosion
|
||
|
|
that look much like they were made with a blade, but they are the
|
||
|
|
result of the lousy design of the system and the fact the cuts only
|
||
|
|
showed up when the rings were cold. If the O-rings got cold and they
|
||
|
|
were flexed as they would be when the Shuttle SRBs ignite the brittle
|
||
|
|
O-ring material literally cracks with a hard, clean edge that looks to
|
||
|
|
the naked eye as if it were made with a knife.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Electron microscopy shows a quite different picture on the very small
|
||
|
|
scale, thus we can tell if the O-ring was cut or was broken. The
|
||
|
|
Challenger 0-rings were broken. There is no evidence that suggests,
|
||
|
|
even for a milisecond, that sabotage was a factor in the accident. And
|
||
|
|
yes, that aspect of it was investigated quite completely.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Apparently what MAJI also doesn't know is that the O-rings are
|
||
|
|
installed in Florida, not Utah. An inspector in Utah could not have
|
||
|
|
done the deed if he wanted to.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. The recent "catastrophic" weather events (examples of the Grey's
|
||
|
|
technological prowess) i.e., the two recent Hurricanes devastating
|
||
|
|
Florida, Louisiana, and Hawaii. In addition, consider the recent
|
||
|
|
diversionary and attention demanding events in Germany, the USSR,
|
||
|
|
Yugoslavia, the Persian Gulf and Somalia. The Grey's timetable is on
|
||
|
|
schedule. The number of controlled Humans exceeds one third of the
|
||
|
|
Earth's population, based on current intelligence estimates. With
|
||
|
|
this number of pawns, under their control, they can create
|
||
|
|
diversions where ever they choose.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Excuse me "Staff-1", if what you say is true and the grays are in
|
||
|
|
such control, why would they have to skip-a-doo to the barrios between
|
||
|
|
Mars and Jupiter to nudge a rock our way that would only create a
|
||
|
|
crater 10 miles wide? And whose current intelligence estimates? It
|
||
|
|
wouldn't be MAJI by any chance, the same folks that don't know that O-
|
||
|
|
rings are installed in Florida, not Utah?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. Current relief efforts are being strained to existing limits.
|
||
|
|
"Overload," is close at hand. The monetary expense to pay for same,
|
||
|
|
could soon bankrupt the U.S. and the world economic community.
|
||
|
|
Should one or more additional major disasters occur before the end
|
||
|
|
of 1992 i.e., a major earthquake, 7.5 or greater, in a heavily
|
||
|
|
populated area, another devastating hurricane, an asteroid strike,
|
||
|
|
etc., economic and social collapse is foreseen. The Greys will have
|
||
|
|
achieved their objectives.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Did everyone pay close attention as to when "Staff-1" discourse
|
||
|
|
turned from an appearance of presenting verifiable facts to wantom
|
||
|
|
hysteria and paranoia? Did everyone notice a steady declining rate from
|
||
|
|
the rational to the irrational?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Staff-1? Who is doing the foreseeing? So far you have demonstrated a
|
||
|
|
lack of knowledge of intelligence procedures, NASA operations, orbital
|
||
|
|
mechanics, and you have an association with a group of people, MAJI,
|
||
|
|
that purports to have investigated the Challenger disaster, but
|
||
|
|
obviously doesn't even know where the O-rings were installed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 10: Hey! Where is the beef?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 11 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. MAJI, elements of the Intelligence Community, and the Phoenix
|
||
|
|
Project, know that there are "other" extraterrestrials adamantly
|
||
|
|
opposed to the Grey's plans. On occasion, these "others" have
|
||
|
|
quietly interfered with certain of the Grey's operations. Thus far,
|
||
|
|
the Greys are unaware that they have experienced such interference.
|
||
|
|
The diversion of 1989FC is an example.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We now see that we have a whole team in the huddle, a triad, that
|
||
|
|
together are smarter than the grays. "Staff-1", you have me confused
|
||
|
|
again. First you say the grays are smart, then you say they are not
|
||
|
|
smart, then you say they are powerful, then you say they are not that
|
||
|
|
powerful, then you say they are all powerful, and now we find out that
|
||
|
|
they don't even know of these "others" that are spoiling their
|
||
|
|
takeover, even though just a while back you emphatically suggest that
|
||
|
|
they could do it anytime they so wished. Is it that they have been
|
||
|
|
spending too much time out between Mars and Jupiter moving rocks
|
||
|
|
around?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You say the grays can hop on two spacecraft, position an asteroid and
|
||
|
|
hurl it towards Earth, that they control the weather on Earth, and one
|
||
|
|
third of the population, yet not see someone tip-toe in their own turf
|
||
|
|
and reposition the asteroid? I am really impressed. I have never seen
|
||
|
|
Mighty Mouse do that. Who are these "others"?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MAJI is fully aware of the Greys intentions. They have undertaken
|
||
|
|
many covert operations against the Greys, without their knowledge,
|
||
|
|
while maintaining a pretence of cooperation with them --still hoping
|
||
|
|
they will obtain the Grey's technology. This dangerous charade has
|
||
|
|
created a dissident element within MAJI that is "leaking"
|
||
|
|
information to sympathetic and concerned individuals in the
|
||
|
|
Intelligence Community.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Whoo now! You mean that not only the "others" but also MAJI tip-toes
|
||
|
|
behind the grays without the grays knowing? And still play poker with
|
||
|
|
them? A while back, I thought you said that MAJI couldn't handle the
|
||
|
|
grays at all. So it isn't MAJI that leaks information to you, but the
|
||
|
|
dissident MAJI. What is it? They don't know how to play poker? Which
|
||
|
|
MAJI group investigated the shuttle disaster? I want to know who not to
|
||
|
|
stack my chips behind.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MAJI, to "hedge their gamble," is also trying to establish a liaison
|
||
|
|
with those "other" extraterrestrials, in the hopes that "they" will
|
||
|
|
"bail-them-out" if the Greys come too close to achieving their
|
||
|
|
ultimate objectives. This duplicity has not gone un-noticed by the
|
||
|
|
"others." To date, MAJI has not achieved any success in this
|
||
|
|
endeavor.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These "others" sound like the ones I would want to bet on. Everybody
|
||
|
|
else you have introduced me to seems to be loosing it somewhere along
|
||
|
|
the way. Who are these "others"? I called Jack right after I first read
|
||
|
|
these files and he wouldn't give me a direct answer. He did say though
|
||
|
|
that if I read the prologue to Starwards, all my questions would be
|
||
|
|
answered. The prologue would introduce me to the "others". But there
|
||
|
|
was nothing in there that said "The 'others' are______." It was just
|
||
|
|
one of your operatives, Richard Miller talking about Hatoon, the real
|
||
|
|
Hatoon.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Staff-1, just between you and I, we both know that the contactee
|
||
|
|
scene of the fifties through seventies has for the most part fell out
|
||
|
|
of favor with the UFO community. You don't suppose Richard Miller might
|
||
|
|
be trying a comeback of somekind? Do you? You know. Something more
|
||
|
|
palatable to the hopla that has taken investigators away from the real
|
||
|
|
phenomena and stopped investigating sightings associated with physical
|
||
|
|
trace evidence on the hope that somebody with the inside stuff would
|
||
|
|
line their pockets. Something with more of a 80s-90s flavor. Something
|
||
|
|
that... Naa, sorry. It was just a silly thought.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 11: Not Quite the End
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 12 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In Summary:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Phoenix Project realizes that the foregoing has a strong
|
||
|
|
resemblance to something that might have been created by Milton W.
|
||
|
|
(Bill) Cooper. We regret any resemblance to such (Cooper sounding)
|
||
|
|
sensational material and can assure you that it is not based on any
|
||
|
|
Cooper material we are aware of. Cooper did not supply any of this
|
||
|
|
information or have anything to do with our research or evaluation
|
||
|
|
concerning it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Thank you for the qualifier. "Staff-1", when you do become aware of
|
||
|
|
whose material it is, I hope you will let us know. I am sure Cooper is
|
||
|
|
happy not to be associated with you either.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Our only purpose in providing this material is to clarify a major
|
||
|
|
reason for our concern -- regarding past, current and world-wide
|
||
|
|
events, what we know concerning those events, and how those events
|
||
|
|
are being orchestrated by the Greys. Another purpose, is to alert
|
||
|
|
researchers to the presence of additional information, make it
|
||
|
|
available to them for further research, and provide another insight
|
||
|
|
into what is happening. It is not our intent to present this
|
||
|
|
material for sensational purposes, gain recognition, or create
|
||
|
|
public panic.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Staff-1", your ONLY purpose counted out to six purposes. Maybe after
|
||
|
|
you finish your refresher courses in basic intelligence, NASA
|
||
|
|
operations, orbital mechanics, the Challenger disaster, and proper tape
|
||
|
|
recording techniques, you might wish to refresh yourself in basic math.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The information is factual in our opinion with sources quoted,
|
||
|
|
whenever possible, so its content can be validated. What you do with
|
||
|
|
it, is up to you. However, we request that you use discernment if it
|
||
|
|
is to receive further dissemination.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Staff-1
|
||
|
|
The Phoenix Project
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Commentary edited by Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Staff-1", a suggestion if I may? Less quotes, more and better
|
||
|
|
sources.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
And what do we have here? "USE DISCERNMENT...". "Staff-1", a piece of
|
||
|
|
advice that everyone on this echo should take to heart and practice,
|
||
|
|
practice, practice. "Staff-1", you have made a worth-while
|
||
|
|
contribution. I thank you.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Part 12: Concluding Remarks---A Case Study in Discerment
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A Case Study Page 13 of 13
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I hold that the UFO phenomenon is real, physical, interacts with the
|
||
|
|
environment and as a corollary, humanity on a global scale. I also hold
|
||
|
|
that no one today knows what the UFO phenomenon is all about. I know I
|
||
|
|
don't.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It appears to me that the best way to help unravel the UFO phenomenon
|
||
|
|
is by investigating and analysing those sighting cases that have
|
||
|
|
physical trace evidence associated with it in the hopes that new clues
|
||
|
|
can be turned into information that will give us a better understanding
|
||
|
|
of what the UFO phenomenon is all about.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
One thing that is clear, to me at least, is that for the last few
|
||
|
|
years UFO researchers have been chasing "windmills" on the advice of
|
||
|
|
"former intelligence officers", "unknown sources that can't be quoted",
|
||
|
|
"members of unknown, mystical government agencies" and people
|
||
|
|
(sometimes associated with cults) that profess to have one or more of
|
||
|
|
"these inside sources". Please! Ask yourselves a simple question. What
|
||
|
|
more do we REALLY know about the phenomenon today, than we did five
|
||
|
|
years ago? or ten?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When I ask that of myself, the answer comes back with a resounding
|
||
|
|
NOTHING. Another thing that is apparent to me is that all the time UFO
|
||
|
|
researchers have invested on the advice of these "mystical moles" is
|
||
|
|
time that has not been used to verify, investigate and analyse UFO
|
||
|
|
cases and reports that have physical trace EVIDENCE associated with
|
||
|
|
them. Resources available to the UFO community are scarce at very best.
|
||
|
|
If you consider yourself as a resource, invest it wisely, use
|
||
|
|
DISCERNMENT and above all CRITICAL THINKING. You can't waste
|
||
|
|
discernment or critical analysis, but you can sure waste your time.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A common fallacy in reasoning is mistaking losses for investment. We
|
||
|
|
all do it. A typical example is the lottery player, maybe your next
|
||
|
|
door neighbor, maybe you, that views all the money spent previously on
|
||
|
|
lottery tickets as an investment and that that somehow will increase
|
||
|
|
the chances on the next lottery ticket purchased. A loss is not an
|
||
|
|
investment. A loss of time is not an investment. Losing time on a hoax,
|
||
|
|
misinformation, or disinformation is not an investment on coming closer
|
||
|
|
to REAL ANSWERS to the UFO phenomenon.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To paraphrase something that "Staff-1" said and change it slightly:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Some people are using human greed, ambition and weakness, and
|
||
|
|
lust for power against UFO researchers (and the UFO community).
|
||
|
|
This is an indication of their intelligence.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You and I want REAL ANSWERS. We are starving for real answers with
|
||
|
|
substance. We are lusting for real clues. We have an ambition, the
|
||
|
|
ambition to discover what the UFO phenomenon is all about. Don't let it
|
||
|
|
become our weakness. Use discernment and critical thinking---our two
|
||
|
|
best allies. Don't let some people con us out of our time---a resource
|
||
|
|
we will never be able to replace. If your serious about real answers to
|
||
|
|
the UFO phenomenon, as soon as you discover misinformation,
|
||
|
|
disinformation, or hoaxes, call it for what it is---A LOSS. Not an
|
||
|
|
investment. And take your resources---discernment, critical thinking,
|
||
|
|
and time---and invest them productively, not with the same people that
|
||
|
|
you already know will produce losses for you.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ed Stewart
|
||
|
|
**********************************************
|
||
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
||
|
|
**********************************************
|