904 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
904 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
SUBJECT: SUMMER 1990 CROP CIRCLES - MICHAEL CHOROST FILE: UFO1220
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
This article ran in "Mufon UFO Journal", December 1990. Back
|
||
|
copies of the issue may be requested by writing to: Mufon, 103
|
||
|
Oldtowne Road, Seguin, TX 78155. Minor corrections have been
|
||
|
made in this online version. The bibliography has been updat-
|
||
|
ed to March 1991. Online version created and released by
|
||
|
Michael Chorost.
|
||
|
|
||
|
THE SUMMER 1990 CROP CIRCLES
|
||
|
|
||
|
by Michael Chorost and Colin Andrews
|
||
|
Aerial photographs by Colin Andrews
|
||
|
Diagrams by Richard G. Andrews
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
(All paragraphs marked [CA] are by Colin Andrews; the rest are
|
||
|
by Michael Chorost.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Summer 1990 brought an explosion in the complexity, size,
|
||
|
and number of the crop circles in England. About six hundred
|
||
|
were discovered, double the number of 1989. One intriguing
|
||
|
early shape was discovered at Longwood Estate on June 6, and
|
||
|
dubbed a "quarter-arc" formation (picture and diagram 1).
|
||
|
Another early shape was the first "dumbbell" formation, dis-
|
||
|
covered on May 23rd near the foot of Telegraph Hill (diagram
|
||
|
2). In its external shape and internal crop lay, it was the
|
||
|
most complex formation ever seen up to that time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Many more dumbbells like this followed (see pictures 2-5,
|
||
|
and diagrams 3-5.) Later in the summer, the "double dumb-
|
||
|
bells", complex formations several hundred feet long, began to
|
||
|
appear. They sported odd-looking forklike extensions, and
|
||
|
entourages of smaller circles nearby. Three of them were
|
||
|
discovered in all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The new formations were a shock to everybody. Much more
|
||
|
than the circles, rings, and quintuplets of earlier years,
|
||
|
they seemed to mean something, though no one knew what. They
|
||
|
seemed both part of the earth and detached from it, as if they
|
||
|
would slide away along the tramlines once their anchor-lines
|
||
|
were cut. They looked at once cryptic, fragile, and luminous.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Discussion of one "dumbbell" formation
|
||
|
--------------------------------------
|
||
|
On July 3, six days after it was made, I examined the
|
||
|
formation in picture 4 (and Diagram 4) in detail. It was 48
|
||
|
meters long, so large that people walking around in it looked
|
||
|
like marbles rolling around a plate. It was made of two
|
||
|
circles of wheat flattened along the ground, one with a ring.
|
||
|
They were connected by a bar, inside which the flattened wheat
|
||
|
plants pointed toward the unringed circle. There was a sort
|
||
|
of "tail", more technically called a spur, where the plants
|
||
|
pointed in the opposite direction from the bar. Four rectan-
|
||
|
gles flanked the bar. In the inner two rectangles, the flat-
|
||
|
tened wheat plants pointed toward the unringed circle; in the
|
||
|
outer two, they pointed the other way.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The most complex part of this formation was where the bar
|
||
|
intersected the ringed circle. The bar crossed the ring and
|
||
|
the band of standing plants, but stopped at the perimeter of
|
||
|
the inner circle. In this area, the plants in the ring lay on
|
||
|
top of the bar, meaning that they had been flattened after the
|
||
|
bar was formed (see picture 10). Hence the formation was made
|
||
|
in at least two stages. Also, whatever formed the ring did
|
||
|
not affect the plants already laid down in the bar. While the
|
||
|
ring was being formed after the bar, the bar's plants stayed
|
||
|
put; they were not realigned to become part of the ring.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The same kind of thing was evident at the other end of
|
||
|
the bar, where it met the unringed circle. The plants in the
|
||
|
circle overlapped the plants in the bar by a few inches,
|
||
|
showing that the unringed circle was also made after the bar.
|
||
|
This is a small clue about how these things are made. They
|
||
|
aren't stamped out all at once, cookie-cutter style; instead,
|
||
|
something forms the parts in a definite sequence.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Most of the plants seemed to be alive and green (young
|
||
|
wheat is green.) However, a friend with me saw that about a
|
||
|
third of the plants whose stems were next to the tramlines had
|
||
|
turned yellowish. We could only speculate that those plants,
|
||
|
having gotten less fertilizer, were less hardy than the rest.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Strangely, some of the plants inside the formation were
|
||
|
not affected by whatever force flattened their fellows. On
|
||
|
either side of the tramline running through the formation,
|
||
|
many plants remained upright (picture 10). This also occurred
|
||
|
in the ring, where isolated individual plants remained stand-
|
||
|
ing here and there, completely unaffected, like lonely survi-
|
||
|
vors of a massacre. (See also "Circular Evidence", p. 133.)
|
||
|
Colin speculates that the formative force may work like a
|
||
|
paint roller, flattening plants in strips and swathes, and
|
||
|
thus may miss a plant here and there between passes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I was fascinated by the giant rectangles (see picture
|
||
|
11.) Rectangles of a sort have been seen in earlier years, as
|
||
|
spurs extending out of circles (see "Circular Evidence", pages
|
||
|
54 and 42.) These, however, were true rectangles. From the
|
||
|
ground, they looked like giant bathtubs.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In each rectangle, three sides looked as if they had been
|
||
|
cut with a razor. However, the "forward" end of each rectan-
|
||
|
gle--the end to which the plants pointed--was not straight but
|
||
|
jagged, or "notched" (picture 12). Whatever made the rectan-
|
||
|
gles faced a challenge here: how to flatten the plants right
|
||
|
at the end without also knocking down the standing plants
|
||
|
making up that end. It solved the problem by pushing the
|
||
|
flattened plants down in bunches between the plants at the
|
||
|
end. The standing plants apppeared unharmed; they stood
|
||
|
perfectly upright, and their leaves were not stripped off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This "notching" effect was also evident at the end of the
|
||
|
"tail." It is a characteristic feature of virtually all rec-
|
||
|
tangular elements.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1990's surveillance operation: Blackbird
|
||
|
----------------------------------------
|
||
|
[CA] Operation Blackbird was the largest surveillance
|
||
|
operation ever conducted to discover and film the cause of the
|
||
|
circles. Between 23rd July and 10th August, 1990, twelve
|
||
|
special cameras were focused on a corridor of land about one
|
||
|
mile long and 700 meters wide at Westbury. The cameras ranged
|
||
|
from thermal imaging to low-light, with sensitive listening
|
||
|
devices for good measure.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] Blackbird netted two significant results. One was
|
||
|
the Army's filming of a "ball of light" above Silbury Hill,
|
||
|
near Avebury. The film shows an orange ball of light in the
|
||
|
sky south of Silbury Hill. Its scale and height are difficult
|
||
|
to gauge. It was initially stationary, then moved slowly to
|
||
|
the east, then descended behind a hill, where it shone through
|
||
|
the trees before it was lost to sight.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Orange balls have been seen before. Richard Beaumont
|
||
|
writes of an orange ball reported on June 29, 1989:
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the early hours of the morning, a most
|
||
|
reliable source spotted an orange ball of
|
||
|
light, about thirty feet in diameter, descend-
|
||
|
ing into a field well known for circle forma-
|
||
|
tions. The eye witness said that it appeared
|
||
|
to bounce slightly as it touched the ground.
|
||
|
He also said that it appeared to have a flat
|
||
|
bottom, but assumed that it must have looked
|
||
|
flat because of its descent into the cereal
|
||
|
crop. The ball appeared brighter at the pe-
|
||
|
riphery, although at no point was it a bril-
|
||
|
liant light. There was no noise whatsoever.
|
||
|
It then took on a hovering position for about
|
||
|
seven to eight seconds, and simply disappeared,
|
||
|
as if one had just turned off a light
|
||
|
bulb...[Colin Andrews and the witness] could
|
||
|
reference where the ball of light must have
|
||
|
been exactly. The next day the local farmer
|
||
|
and others rang Colin. A new formation had
|
||
|
formed exactly where the ball of light was
|
||
|
seen! (Beaumont, "Kindred Spirit", vol. 1, no.
|
||
|
8, p 27.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] The other result of Blackbird was the BBC's filming
|
||
|
of a set of circles forming at Westbury during the night of
|
||
|
3rd-4th August. The film is of poor quality, even after
|
||
|
enhancement, but it shows a darkened shape relating to the
|
||
|
largest circle's size and location. In the morning, the
|
||
|
formation was seen to be a large circle with a looping tail
|
||
|
pushing out of it and terminating in a smaller circle about 10
|
||
|
meters away. Two other, smaller circles were also formed some
|
||
|
distance away.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] The BBC had promised to show both the Army's and its
|
||
|
own films on a special programme, but they now inform me that
|
||
|
somebody has decided that they are not compatible with the
|
||
|
"Daytime UK" programme. The BBC have stated, in fact, that
|
||
|
they do not plan to show the films at all. It is not clear
|
||
|
why. [Chorost: Colin has since told me that the BBC plans to
|
||
|
air the tapes on "People Today", BBC 1, March 21, 1991.]
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] Blackbird also suffered from a cruel hoax. During
|
||
|
the early hours of 25th July, several of the 50-strong observ-
|
||
|
ers witnessed unusual lights on one of the monitors. Key
|
||
|
researchers, as well as members of UK and Japanese TV crews,
|
||
|
were summoned. As the sun came up, the watchers and press
|
||
|
could see that a large and intricate formation had been made.
|
||
|
Breakfast-time TV was on the air, and pressured me to make a
|
||
|
statement. I agreed to do so, and stated on live national
|
||
|
television what the observers had seen and that circles had
|
||
|
appeared on the same spot. Within two hours over 30 TV net-
|
||
|
works were on the site and the news was bounced around the
|
||
|
world that a UFO had been seen forming the mystery circles.
|
||
|
Later, we walked into the field to view the circles firsthand.
|
||
|
We found that they were all hoaxed, and that the lights on the
|
||
|
monitors were from the hoaxers. Also, crosses and Ouija
|
||
|
boards had been left in the circles by the hoaxers. Lively
|
||
|
debate is still heard in the streets and pubs of the UK about
|
||
|
this whole episode; however, genuine formations continued to
|
||
|
form throughout the rest of the summer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Other observations and discoveries
|
||
|
----------------------------------
|
||
|
The number of circles reported has risen steadily in the
|
||
|
last few years. Much of it is due to the rise in monitoring,
|
||
|
but the number of circles per given area also appears to be
|
||
|
increasing. According to Terence Meaden's "The Circles Effect
|
||
|
and its Mysteries" (p. 14) and his article in the Oxford
|
||
|
conference proceedings (p. 22), 75 formations were discovered
|
||
|
in 1987, 110 in 1988, and 305 in 1989. In 1990, according to
|
||
|
Colin Andrews, there were about 600 formations. [Footnote:
|
||
|
These numbers should be treated with caution, since I am not
|
||
|
familar with how researchers count circles. Is a quintuplet
|
||
|
formation counted as one "circle" or five? Are "grapeshot"
|
||
|
circles (very small circles less than a meter in diameter)
|
||
|
counted separately? Do the various researchers count circles
|
||
|
in the same way? These questions need to be investigated.]
|
||
|
The rate of increase presents obvious problems for the re-
|
||
|
searchers, whose resources were already strained by the number
|
||
|
of formations which appeared in 1990.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] HSC Laboratories in England have analysed plants
|
||
|
taken from a Celtic-cross formation type found at Blackland,
|
||
|
Wiltshire, on 1st June this year, using a distillation process
|
||
|
which crystallizes the plants. Electron microscope observa-
|
||
|
tion showed that the pattern of the crystals was dramatically
|
||
|
different from those of the control samples. A great deal
|
||
|
more work must be done before these early results can be
|
||
|
confirmed as significant. Suffice it to say that three trials
|
||
|
have shown similar results (see "Crop Circles--The Latest
|
||
|
Evidence".)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Electrical equipment continues to malfunction occasional-
|
||
|
ly inside the circles. Busty Taylor reports that video cam-
|
||
|
eras sometimes fail to record inside them; the tape advances,
|
||
|
but the magnetic head records either erratically or not at
|
||
|
all. Terence Meaden reports that a camera consistently re-
|
||
|
fused to function while pointed down to photograph the center
|
||
|
of a circle, but worked in every other orientation tried
|
||
|
(Oxford conference notes, p. 41).
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] Electromagnetic effects have been experienced on a
|
||
|
number of occasions, not least on Thursday, 10th August 1989,
|
||
|
at 3:30 p.m. when a BBC television crew was filming myself and
|
||
|
Pat Delgado in a 100-foot diameter circle near Avebury, Wilt-
|
||
|
shire. The troubles began when the camera refused to function
|
||
|
correctly each time it entered the circle and several smaller
|
||
|
circles nearby. Even when elevated on a crane over the edge
|
||
|
of the circles, it wouldn't work. It was agreed to start the
|
||
|
next shot by holding the camera outside the circle, while we
|
||
|
went inside with the sound engineer. As the camera rolled and
|
||
|
sound began taping, suddenly a loud, shrill, warbling noise
|
||
|
blasted into the sound engineer's headset. This was a noise
|
||
|
we had heard before at circle sites. Pat stood near the
|
||
|
center of the circle and felt the effects of an energy field
|
||
|
around him. The cone-shaped energy field was so clearly felt
|
||
|
by him that the edges could be easily defined. Each time Pat
|
||
|
walked out of the cone the buzzing noise cleared up from the
|
||
|
engineer's headset. The noise was recorded and sent to the
|
||
|
BBC's sound experts in London; they, as well as experts at the
|
||
|
Birmingham studio, were baffled by it. The camera was found
|
||
|
to be completely defunct and had to be rebuilt.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[CA] The event was shown on the BBC's "Daytime Live"
|
||
|
programme. Presumably by coincidence, as the transmission
|
||
|
went on air, the electric supply into the whole studio complex
|
||
|
was momentarily lost and seconds later all telephones were put
|
||
|
out of operation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There are anecdotal reports of positive and negative
|
||
|
health effects on people who enter these formations. Busty
|
||
|
Taylor reports that he sometimes feels the fillings in his
|
||
|
teeth hurt in a circle, and he says other people suffer head-
|
||
|
aches and back pains. He and one other person once encoun-
|
||
|
tered a blob of strange white jelly in one circle, and came
|
||
|
down with severe colds three to six hours later. A third
|
||
|
person who was also there, however, remained healthy. There
|
||
|
are also reports of dogs becoming ill when in or near circles
|
||
|
(see "Circular Evidence", p. 65).
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I entered the formation in picture 4, I had a friend
|
||
|
with me who had had a severe headache for two days. Upon
|
||
|
entering the formation, she felt it go away. It returned soon
|
||
|
after she left the formation. (I, myself, felt nothing in any
|
||
|
of the formations I visited. Nor did I hear anything in the
|
||
|
hearing aids I wear.) There are fields of an electrical or
|
||
|
ionic nature inside the formations, and they could affect
|
||
|
sensitive humans in the ways mentioned. Tooth fillings, for
|
||
|
example, are metal wet by saliva, and might become electrical-
|
||
|
ly charged by induction.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Terence Meaden writes of four eyewitness reports of
|
||
|
circles forming in daylight before the eyes of surprised
|
||
|
onlookers. In one event, a witness saw corn in a small area
|
||
|
violently buffeted, then rapidly laid flat in a circle 50-60
|
||
|
feet in diameter (Oxford conference notes, p. 123). Meaden
|
||
|
interprets these as the effects of stationary whirlwinds, but
|
||
|
it is equally possible to postulate a force which either
|
||
|
operates from a great height or acts invisibly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As a graduate student in literature, I watch for mention
|
||
|
of circles in the 15th and 16th-century texts I read. Robert
|
||
|
Burton, in his book "Anatomy of Melancholy" (1621), writes:
|
||
|
"These are they [fairies] that dance on heaths and greens, as
|
||
|
Lavater thinks with Trithemius, &, as Olaus Magnus adds, leave
|
||
|
that green circle, which we commonly find in plain fields,
|
||
|
which others hold to proceed from a meteor falling, or some
|
||
|
accidental rankness of the ground; so Nature sports herself"
|
||
|
(p. 168). It could well be, however, that Burton's only
|
||
|
talking about fairy rings, fungal infections which blight
|
||
|
plants in circular patterns. It's hard to draw firm conclu-
|
||
|
sions from this report.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Update on the hoax theory
|
||
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
The evidence against hoaxing is compelling. The absence
|
||
|
of physical trampling, the precision of the crop lays, the
|
||
|
rapidity of manufacture, the great numbers and immense sizes
|
||
|
of the formations, the plants' biological changes, the elec-
|
||
|
tromagnetic phenomena of flashing lights and crackling/humming
|
||
|
sounds, the "cones of force" sometimes felt by observers
|
||
|
within the formations, the malfunctions in equipment, the
|
||
|
health effects, the eyewitness reports of circles forming "by
|
||
|
themselves," the apparent human inability to reproduce a
|
||
|
"genuine" circle--all these observations argue against the
|
||
|
hoax theory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Oxford conference
|
||
|
---------------------
|
||
|
The first conference on the circles was held at Oxford
|
||
|
Polytechnic on June 23, 1990. Organized by TORRO (Tornado and
|
||
|
Storm Research Organization) and CERES (Circles Effect Re-
|
||
|
search Group), its speakers focused on the theory that vor-
|
||
|
tices of spinning plasma in the lower atmosphere are responsi-
|
||
|
ble for the formations. There were over 150 people attending,
|
||
|
among which were professional scientists, circle investiga-
|
||
|
tors, journalists, and members of the public.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The primary figure at the conference was Terence Meaden,
|
||
|
an Oxford-educated physicist specializing in the study of
|
||
|
atmospheric plasma vortices. He argued that highly electri-
|
||
|
fied, rapidly spinning vortices of air have enough energy to
|
||
|
flatten large areas of crops. Grains of dust and pollen
|
||
|
trapped inside the vortex rub together and generate a substan-
|
||
|
tial electric charge, which increases the total energy borne
|
||
|
by the vortex. Crucial to his theory is the presence of hills
|
||
|
large enough to create wind lees--turbulence--in their wake.
|
||
|
Under the right meterological conditions, air moving past
|
||
|
hills whips into spinning vortices, which travel for some
|
||
|
distance before touching the ground. Their energy dissipates
|
||
|
upon contact, leaving behind a perfect circular formation,
|
||
|
broken up into satellites or rings according to the internal
|
||
|
structure of the vortex.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Both Colin and I, and many others, find the theory of
|
||
|
natural origin improbable in view of the complexity of the
|
||
|
formations. However, the circles might be made by intelli-
|
||
|
gently controlled vortices of the kind Meaden describes. For
|
||
|
this reason, I think Meaden's physics shouldn't be dismissed
|
||
|
out of hand.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Meaden also showed slides of a new and rare occurrence -
|
||
|
a raised "cone" of braided plants discovered at the centers of
|
||
|
some circles. The cones appear to be several feet high, and
|
||
|
rule out, Meaden argued, theories involving physical (as
|
||
|
opposed to meterological or electrical) compression from
|
||
|
above. Cones were discovered in 10 of the approximately 300
|
||
|
circles found in 1989.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another speaker was Dr. John Snow of Purdue University,
|
||
|
who gave an informative lecture on the physics of atmospheric
|
||
|
vortices. He showed that under certain circumstances, spin-
|
||
|
ning vortices can spontaneously break up into two or three
|
||
|
vortices. This, Snow suggested, was the mechanism behind the
|
||
|
"triplet" formations of a large circle and two satellites in a
|
||
|
straight line, and, by extension, a potential answer to the
|
||
|
problem of the gigantic quintuplet formations (a large circle
|
||
|
and four satellites.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
A physicist from Japan, Dr. Yoshi-hiko Ohtsuki, discussed
|
||
|
plasma vortices in nature, which are already well documented
|
||
|
as "ball lightning." His research focuses on the attempt to
|
||
|
create spinning plasma vortices in the laboratory. He showed
|
||
|
films of short-lived (2.5 seconds) but energetic spinning
|
||
|
plasma balls he had succeeded in generating.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Other speakers were Tokio Kokuchi and Hiroshi Kikuchi
|
||
|
(Japan), David Reynolds (England), and Paul Fuller and Jenny
|
||
|
Randles (England.) Fuller and Randles argued that plasma
|
||
|
vortices can account for virtually all still-unexplained UFO
|
||
|
sightings, and proposed that UFO studies should be considered
|
||
|
a branch of meteorology.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But many thought the most important speaker was Busty
|
||
|
Taylor. He showed slides and videotapes of recent formations
|
||
|
he had filmed from the air. They were so new that most of the
|
||
|
people in the audience had not seen them. Their impact was
|
||
|
sensational. For many, they made the carefully phrased argu-
|
||
|
ments for a natural cause disintegrate.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Events outside England
|
||
|
----------------------
|
||
|
North America has "caught" the circles. MUFON's April
|
||
|
1990 issue reports a 7-foot, 8-inch diameter circle discovered
|
||
|
in Gulf Breeze, Florida in November 1989. A 46 1/2 foot
|
||
|
diameter circle was found in Milan, Illinois, on October 16,
|
||
|
1990 (Chicago Tribune, Oct. 28, 1990, p. 1). I have a letter
|
||
|
from a farmer which sketches a May 31, 1989 discovery of a 20-
|
||
|
by-18 foot diameter circle of uprooted tall grass found near
|
||
|
Anderson, Indiana.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The October 1990 issue of the Dakota Farmer reports a
|
||
|
formation discovered in Leola, South Dakota, in early August
|
||
|
1990, consisting of a "reversed question mark" surrounded by
|
||
|
three rectangles arranged on the points of an equilateral
|
||
|
triangle. The "question mark" is about thirty feet wide and
|
||
|
eighty feet long, and consists of plants bent over exactly two
|
||
|
inches above the ground. The width of the affected areas is a
|
||
|
consistent five feet.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There was highly concentrated activity in 1990 around
|
||
|
Winnipeg, Canada. Chris Rutkowski of Winnipeg has submitted a
|
||
|
preliminary report to MUFON noting at least seven formations.
|
||
|
One circle was 59 feet in diameter, and appeared on August 18,
|
||
|
1990, near a town called St. Francois Xavier. Another, 62
|
||
|
feet in diameter, was discovered in Niverville on August 29,
|
||
|
1990. Most of the reports are of simple circles, though a
|
||
|
triple-ringed circle is said to have been found.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The TV series "Unsolved Mysteries" keeps a listing of
|
||
|
callers' reports. One caller, from Naples, Florida, reported
|
||
|
a 10-foot circle in a field of tall weeds. Other reports come
|
||
|
from Oregon, Minnesota, Ohio, Tennessee, California, Pennsyl-
|
||
|
vania, and New York State. Most are recent, but some go back
|
||
|
as far as 25 years.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is considerable variation in the types of forma-
|
||
|
tions reported in North America. Many are of flattened plants
|
||
|
like the English circles, while others are of burned plants.
|
||
|
In others, the plants are uprooted entirely, leaving a bare
|
||
|
circle of dirt. No one knows whether these formation types
|
||
|
are related.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, in the UFO literature, going back at least
|
||
|
twenty years, there have been reports of circles in Australia,
|
||
|
America, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, and the Soviet Union.
|
||
|
MUFON's October 1990 issue reports a 35-by-45 meter circle
|
||
|
found on June 21, 1990, near the town of Yeisk (near Krasno-
|
||
|
dar) in the Soviet Union.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One of the most interesting questions at the present time
|
||
|
is whether the circles phenomenon in other countries will
|
||
|
follow the English pattern. So far, the majority of non-
|
||
|
English formations are simple circles, with a handful of more
|
||
|
exotic shapes. Will the same English shapes as seen in 1990
|
||
|
appear in Winnipeg in a few years, or will the phenomenon take
|
||
|
a different direction? The South Dakota "reversed question
|
||
|
mark in a triangle" suggests that the latter may be the case.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A Coded Message?
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
Do we have a coded message on our hands? Nobody knows,
|
||
|
but much can be done to try to find out. In this section I
|
||
|
will propose some guidelines for such an effort.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The first thing to consider is whether the circles are a
|
||
|
message. As I see it, there are three possibilities.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. The circles might not be a message. They could be the
|
||
|
side-effect of some intelligently directed process, the way
|
||
|
tire-tracks and footprints are. In that case there would be
|
||
|
no meaning to decode, only a process to discover.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. The circles could be an anti-code, a null code. They
|
||
|
could be intended to convey a message merely by their
|
||
|
presence, like "2001"'s monolith. Their variety and complex-
|
||
|
ity might be meant only to convince humans of their non-natu-
|
||
|
ral origin. If so, there would be no content to decode, only
|
||
|
a awe-inspiring calling-card to contemplate.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The circles could be a positive code that we can
|
||
|
crack. This is the most interesting idea, and the only one
|
||
|
that can be developed at any length. For the rest of this
|
||
|
discussion, let us abandon the foregoing possibilities, and
|
||
|
assume that the circles are a code. How can we crack it?
|
||
|
|
||
|
We can apply various kinds of coding strategies to the
|
||
|
formations to see if any work. For convenience, I'll divide
|
||
|
the possible codes into three broad types: "linguistic" codes
|
||
|
("words"), "figural" codes ("pictures") and "logical" codes
|
||
|
("sequences"). If we look for linguistic codes, we try to
|
||
|
find ideograms or alphanumeric characters. If we look for
|
||
|
figural codes, we try to find schematic diagrams, pictures of
|
||
|
objects, maps, or works of art. And if we look for logical
|
||
|
codes, we look for mathematical or logical sequences. Let's
|
||
|
look at the particular challenges of each kind of code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Linguistic codes
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
A linguistic code is, of course, either a natural alpha-
|
||
|
betic language like English, a direct isomorphism of it (like
|
||
|
a cryptogram), or an ideographic language (like Chinese.) To
|
||
|
crack such a code, we would need a "Rosetta stone" establish-
|
||
|
ing equivalences between human and alien languages. So far,
|
||
|
of course, we have none. We would have to be given one, or we
|
||
|
would have to find that the formations are adopted from an
|
||
|
obscure or forgotten human language (like Mayan, which they do
|
||
|
superficially resemble.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Lacking a Rosetta stone, we might be able build a grammar
|
||
|
of the code on the order of "x always follows y, z is always
|
||
|
part of q", though this would not be a "decoding." But even a
|
||
|
purely relational grammar would be a significant advance. We
|
||
|
may have its raw elements at hand. The circles are composed
|
||
|
of a limited number of elements which are combined and recom-
|
||
|
bined to make a wide variety of formations. So far, the
|
||
|
simple elements--the building blocks--seem to be circle, the
|
||
|
ring, the rectangle, the straight spur, the curved spur, the
|
||
|
partial arc, and the "fork" of two or three prongs. (The
|
||
|
"fork" may be decomposable into overlapping rectangles.) The
|
||
|
elements might be semantically modified by variations in size
|
||
|
and floor lay. The position of the formations relative to the
|
||
|
tramlines, and to the countryside as a whole, could be addi-
|
||
|
tional modifiers. It is certainly possible to look for a
|
||
|
grammar.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Personally, I am skeptical about the linguistic approach.
|
||
|
The circles are growing increasingly complex, but compared to
|
||
|
human language, they still seem simple. There are many varia-
|
||
|
tions, but they are relatively restricted (take the three
|
||
|
double-dumbbells). Furthermore, if they are linguistic, the
|
||
|
language is an inefficient one. The shapes are highly symmet-
|
||
|
rical, hence highly redundant. If most of the formations were
|
||
|
cut in half lengthwise, they would still convey the same
|
||
|
amount of implicit information; some could be cut in quarters.
|
||
|
If one looks at human language, one will see that nearly all
|
||
|
words and ideograms are asymmetrical. This also holds for
|
||
|
letters; most fonts are serifed, making even "i" and "l"
|
||
|
asymmetric. Symmetry wastes space. Asymmetry maximizes
|
||
|
information content and transmission in a limited space.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Still, this does not eliminate the linguistic code theo-
|
||
|
ry, for inefficiency can be overcome by length. DNA has only
|
||
|
four base units, but it is very long. The circlemakers, like
|
||
|
Tolkien's Ents, might not care about brevity or efficiency.
|
||
|
|
||
|
All this being said, we are still left with a basic
|
||
|
question: Why would the circlemakers use such a code at all?
|
||
|
It would have been easy to start with something simple like a
|
||
|
sequence of primes, and build up. The circles may be in-
|
||
|
scrutable for subtle cultural and political reasons, rather
|
||
|
than out of any deficit of sense. Or perhaps we have a defi-
|
||
|
cit of sense: the circlemakers could be sitting around (so to
|
||
|
speak), scratching their heads (so to speak), and wondering,
|
||
|
"What is it with these humans? All the other planets got it
|
||
|
right away." But I prefer to believe that our only deficit is
|
||
|
in the attention we have given to decoding strategies.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Figural codes
|
||
|
-------------
|
||
|
Turning to the second broad approach, the formations
|
||
|
could be "pictures." They might be schematic diagrams, say of
|
||
|
molecules, electronic circuits, or constellations. To explore
|
||
|
this possibility, people ought to distribute the pictures as
|
||
|
widely as possible, hoping that somebody somewhere will recog-
|
||
|
nize the code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Or the formations might be literal images. They could be
|
||
|
pictures of spacecraft, or alien physiologies, or body mark-
|
||
|
ings, or natural phenomena. As "pictures", however, they seem
|
||
|
rather limited. There is no apparent effort at perspective or
|
||
|
shading. Perhaps they are meant as two-dimensional images,
|
||
|
like projections or shadows. Or perhaps there is a form of
|
||
|
perspective at work, but one quite foreign to our conventions.
|
||
|
(Consider how the Egyptians and the Cubists drew the human
|
||
|
form.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Of course, the formations might be diagrams of wholly
|
||
|
unfamiliar objects, in which case we would have no chance of
|
||
|
recognizing them. A more unsettling possibility is that they
|
||
|
are diagrams of quite familiar objects, but drawn by unfamil-
|
||
|
iar conventions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another possibility is that they are symbols of cultural
|
||
|
significance, akin to our crosses and flags. There do appear
|
||
|
to be motifs, such as the quintuplets and dumbbells, which
|
||
|
appear repeatedly with variations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, they might be works of art. Certainly some of
|
||
|
them are beautiful enough to be. We could try interpreting
|
||
|
them as such. The double dumbbells look like meditations on
|
||
|
mechanical fluidity; the eye spills from circle to circle,
|
||
|
simultaneously drawn along and slowed down by the forklike
|
||
|
extensions. The overall impression is of arrested motion.
|
||
|
One can visualize the forks spinning round, the dumbbells
|
||
|
gyrating like molecules around centers of gravity.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the circles are art, the point is not to produce the
|
||
|
"correct" response; it is to respond, period. Thus a dialogue
|
||
|
opens. It could be that the response to our amazement and
|
||
|
wonder is the creation of even bigger and more beautiful
|
||
|
formations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Logical codes
|
||
|
-------------
|
||
|
The third approach is to look for patterns in the forma-
|
||
|
tions. There do seem to be some. For instance, each double-
|
||
|
dumbbell has a three-pronged "fork" sticking off the largest
|
||
|
circle, with a short spur on the other end of the circle.
|
||
|
Each formation has a two-pronged fork on one of the other
|
||
|
circles. And many of the single dumbbells have either two or
|
||
|
four rectangles flanking the bar. And so on. The question
|
||
|
is: Can we find a logical pattern? If we can, the crucial
|
||
|
test would be to predict subsequent formations. It would be
|
||
|
even better to make a new formation following the rules, and
|
||
|
see if there is a response.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Program of Action
|
||
|
-----------------
|
||
|
"Cereology"--the study of the circles--is proceeding (or,
|
||
|
sometimes, not proceeding) along four fronts: publicity, data
|
||
|
collection, data distribution, and data analysis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Publicity is crucial, for only when people become deeply
|
||
|
aware of the situation will they be moved to do something
|
||
|
about it. Much has already been accomplished, on TV and in a
|
||
|
number of articles in the mass media (see bibliography). But
|
||
|
more needs to be done in America, since the people who have
|
||
|
the resources to do something--scientists, policymakers,
|
||
|
academics--have not been given enough information to convince
|
||
|
them to act. Nor is information being targeted to the right
|
||
|
places. Thus books need to be distributed to American book-
|
||
|
stores and placed in the science (not New Age, not occult)
|
||
|
sections, and in-depth articles need to be published in jour-
|
||
|
nals like Scientific American and National Geographic. So
|
||
|
far, many upper-rank magazines are unwilling to get involved,
|
||
|
but hopefully this will change as the dimensions of the phe-
|
||
|
nomenon become more widely known.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Data collection is being done by a relatively small band
|
||
|
of people in England, most of them amateurs. They mount
|
||
|
nighttime surveillance operations like Blackbird, drive around
|
||
|
looking for new formations, do aerial photography, make sur-
|
||
|
face measurements, mount weather stations, analyze plants, and
|
||
|
dowse. (The largest data base of information is held by Colin
|
||
|
Andrews.) But as said before, the number of circles far out-
|
||
|
strips their collective ability to keep up. As for North
|
||
|
America, things still depend on the farmer or reporter who is
|
||
|
willing to take pictures and make measurements, though Winni-
|
||
|
peg seems to be gearing up fast.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The state of data distribution is difficult to assess
|
||
|
from America. Certainly America gets little of the English
|
||
|
data, though lines of communication are beginning to open.
|
||
|
The CCCS in England is working to establish a clearinghouse of
|
||
|
information. Within North America, people are beginning to
|
||
|
find each other and correspond. But there is still an urgent
|
||
|
need to create a North American and international network of
|
||
|
data distribution.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Data analysis (mathematical, linguistic, chemical) is
|
||
|
just beginning. Serious work can only take place when the
|
||
|
three other fronts are functioning smoothly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There may come a fifth front: response/action. If the
|
||
|
formations constitute a message and we decode it, we may want
|
||
|
to answer, as I suggested above, by tromping plants down to
|
||
|
make patterns ourselves. (Interestingly enough, several days
|
||
|
after the Blackbird hoax, genuine circles appeared in an
|
||
|
adjacent field parallel to the hoaxed formation.) Or if they
|
||
|
constitute blueprints or instructions, then we may want to
|
||
|
start making or doing something. And this, too, would need
|
||
|
organization.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the readers of the MUFON journal want to get involved,
|
||
|
the best way is to pick a clearly defined goal for one's
|
||
|
locality. For example, ask local farmers if they have seen
|
||
|
circles on their land, or get the area bookstores to order
|
||
|
some of the books, or persuade the paper or TV station to run
|
||
|
a story, or start giving information to people with resources,
|
||
|
or do data collection, or try to decode the circles
|
||
|
oneself--there's no lack of things to be done.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is much to be done, but there is also the need for
|
||
|
strategic patience. It's hard for people to accept that these
|
||
|
luminous forms are truly part of our world. The concept takes
|
||
|
time to sink in. And new concepts often get harsh treatment
|
||
|
at first. Galileo's Ptolemist contemporaries, presented with
|
||
|
a telescope to look at Jupiter's moons, dismissed what they
|
||
|
saw as illusions, or refused to look. Since this kind of
|
||
|
rigidity still exists today, it will take persuasion, publici-
|
||
|
ty, and patience to convince people to look at them with a
|
||
|
more open mind. And if the circles do lead to a conceptual
|
||
|
revolution, the task will be to manage it wisely.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Send circle reports to MUFON
|
||
|
----------------------------
|
||
|
If any readers of this journal know of new formations,
|
||
|
please report them! Document them with photos and measure-
|
||
|
ments if you can, and send the data to MUFON, 103 Oldtowne
|
||
|
Road, Seguin, Texas 78155-4099.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Acknowledgements
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
The authors would like to thank Walt Andrus, Paul Bone,
|
||
|
Grant Cameron, Malcolm and Maureen Gilham, Jerrold R. Johnson,
|
||
|
Ludwig and Kathleen Lowenstein, John Salter, Dennis Stacy, and
|
||
|
Don Tuersley for all their help and encouragement.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bibliography and Ordering Information
|
||
|
-------------------------------------
|
||
|
Americans have to pay high prices for publications available
|
||
|
only from England, since the dollar is weak. There are two
|
||
|
options: make out a check in pounds at a bank, adding two
|
||
|
pounds to cover the extra cost of overseas postage if not
|
||
|
already included, or send a check in dollars at the current
|
||
|
exchange rate, factoring in an extra pound to pay for currency
|
||
|
conversion, and two more to cover postage. These are only
|
||
|
guidelines, based on what's worked for me.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Citations are alphabetical by first author.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Books
|
||
|
-----
|
||
|
Circular Evidence. Pat Delgado and Colin Andrews. London:
|
||
|
Bloomsbury Press, 1989. 190 pp. US price $29.95. One can
|
||
|
order from at least three places: (1) Phanes Press, P.O. Box
|
||
|
6114, Grand Rapids, MI 49516, tel. (616) 281-1224. (2) Arctu-
|
||
|
rus Book Services, P.O. Box 831383, Stone Mountain, Georgia,
|
||
|
30083-0023, tel. (404) 297-4624. (3) Trafalgar Square, Ver-
|
||
|
mont, NY, tel. (802) 457-1911.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Crop Circles: The Latest Evidence. Pat Delgado and Colin
|
||
|
Andrews. London: Bloomsbury Press, 1990. 80 pp. UK L5.99.
|
||
|
Ordering information as above.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Controversy of the Circles. Paul Fuller and Jenny Ran-
|
||
|
dles. UK L4.20. Order from BUFORA, 103 Hove Avenue, Waltham-
|
||
|
stow, London.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Crop Circles: A Mystery Solved. Paul Fuller and Jenny Ran-
|
||
|
dles. UK L13.95. Robert Hale Ltd., 45-47 Clerkenwell House,
|
||
|
London, EC1R 0HT.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Circles Effect and Its Mysteries. George Terence Meaden.
|
||
|
Bradford-on-Avon: Artetech Publishing Company, April 1990 (2nd
|
||
|
ed.) 116 pp. UK L11.95. Order from Artetech, 54 Frome Road,
|
||
|
Bradford-on-Avon, BA15 1LD; tel. 02216 2482.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Proceedings of the First International Conference on the
|
||
|
Circles Effect. Ed. George Terence Meaden and Derek Elsom.
|
||
|
Copyright TORRO-CERES (Tornado and Storm Research Organiza-
|
||
|
tion-Circles Effect Research Group). 134pp. Conference held
|
||
|
at Oxford Polytechnic on June 23, 1990. Meaden plans to
|
||
|
publish the proceedings in book form, as Circles in the Sky.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Crop Circle Enigma. Edited by Ralph Noyes. Bath: Gateway
|
||
|
Books, 1990. 192 pp. $29.95. One can order from at least
|
||
|
four places: (1) The Great Tradition, 11270 Clayton Creek
|
||
|
Road, P.O. Box 108, Lower Lake, CA 95457, tel. (707) 995-3906.
|
||
|
(2) New Leaf Book Distributing Co, 5425 Tulane Drive SW,
|
||
|
Atlanta, GA 30336-2323, tel. (404) 691-6996. (3) Inland Book
|
||
|
Co, P.O. Box 261, East Haven, CT 06512, tel. (203) 467-4257.
|
||
|
(4) Bookpeople, 2929 Fifth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, tel.
|
||
|
(415) 549-3030.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Periodicals
|
||
|
-----------
|
||
|
Circles Phenomenon Research (CPR) Newsletter. Editor: Pat
|
||
|
Delgado. 1-year subscription (4 issues) $24.00. CPR Satel-
|
||
|
lite Office, 117 Ashland Lane, Aurora, OH 44202. Make checks
|
||
|
payable to D.S. Rulison.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Crop Watcher. Editor: Paul Fuller. 1-year subscription
|
||
|
(6 issues) UK L13.00 (overseas airmail price.) 3 Selborne
|
||
|
Court, Tavistock Close, Romsey, Hampshire SO51 7TY, England.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Circular. Editor: Bob Kingsley. Circulated free. 58
|
||
|
Kings Road, West End, Woking, Surrey GU24 9LW, England. The
|
||
|
editor requests donation of stamps; American subscribers ought
|
||
|
to send checks for a few dollars.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Journal of Meteorology. Editor: Terence Meaden. 1-year
|
||
|
overseas subscription (10 issues) UK L55 surface, L65 airmail.
|
||
|
54 Frome Road, Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire, BA15 1LD, England.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Cereologist. Published by CCCS (Centre for Crop Circle
|
||
|
Studies). Editor: John Michell. 1-year subscription (3
|
||
|
issues) UK L7.50, US $18. 11 Powis Gardens, London W11 1JG,
|
||
|
England.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Selected Bibliography
|
||
|
---------------------
|
||
|
"Prepare to Meet Thy Drought." Anonymous. Today, July 20,
|
||
|
1990. (Suggests the multiple pictograms resemble the Sumerian
|
||
|
language or weather-map symbols.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"More Circular Evidence." Richard Beaumont. Kindred Spirit,
|
||
|
vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 25-28. (Interview with Colin Andrews.
|
||
|
Discusses electrical, psychic, and historical events associat-
|
||
|
ed with the circles. This is the best single article I've
|
||
|
seen.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Crop Circles: The Mystery Deepens." Richard Beaumont.
|
||
|
Kindred Spirit, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 32-37. (Summary of the
|
||
|
key developments of the Summer 1990 season, with aerial pho-
|
||
|
tos. Another good article by Beaumont.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"UFO Report to Farmers." George Brandsberg. Farm Profit,
|
||
|
July-August 1975. (Discusses scorched patches and long
|
||
|
swathes of sliced-off corn.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Around and Around in Circles." Sally B. Donnelly. Time
|
||
|
Magazine. Sept. 18, 1989, p.50. Letters of response in Oct.
|
||
|
9th issue, p. 14. (Overview of the phenomenon; three color
|
||
|
pictures.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Mysterious Circles in British Fields Spook the Populace."
|
||
|
Craig Forman. Wall Street Journal, Aug 28, 1989, p. A1.
|
||
|
(Basic overview.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Circles in the fields inspire talk of UFO's." Maria Goodav-
|
||
|
age, USA Today, November 15, 1990, p. 6A.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Daylight Close Encounter." Stan Gordon. MUFON UFO Journal,
|
||
|
July 1989, pp. 18-21. (Discusses Pennsylvania UFO sighting
|
||
|
and related circular landing trace.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Retrospective Investigation of a Possible Trace at Mt. Gar-
|
||
|
net". Holly Goriss and Russell Boundy. UFO Research Austra-
|
||
|
lia Newsletter, March-April 1981 (Vol 2. No. 2) pp. 4-6.
|
||
|
(Investigates a 1977 ground marking which looks like a crude
|
||
|
quintuplet.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"They never yet could find my measure." Wendy Grossman, New
|
||
|
Scientist, December 1, 1990, pp. 61-2. (Review of The Crop
|
||
|
Circle Enigma.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"A Sighting in Saskatchewan." Hynek, J. Allen and Vallee,
|
||
|
Jacques, in The Edge of Reality (Appendix A). The Henry
|
||
|
Regnery Co., 1975. (Discusses Canadian UFO sighting and
|
||
|
related circular flattened areas.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Experts Can't Square Explanations of Circles." Gregory
|
||
|
Jensen. Washington Times, July 27, 1990. Page A1. (Reports
|
||
|
the Blackbird hoax incident. Photo of one of the pictograms.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Circles in the corn." Terence Meaden. New Scientist, June
|
||
|
23, 1990, 47-9. (Argues for the plasma vortex theory.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"The Beckhampton 'Scroll-Type' Circles, The Beckhampton
|
||
|
'Triangle', and Strange Attractors." Terence Meaden, Journal
|
||
|
of Meteorology (Trowbridge, U.K.), October 1990, pp. 317-320.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"And Now...Cornfield Circles in Australia!" Paul Norman.
|
||
|
Flying Saucer Review, vol. 35, no. 1 (March Quarter, 1990),
|
||
|
pp. 7-8. (Briefly discusses nine 1980's crop circles in
|
||
|
Beulah, Victoria, between 3 and 16 feet in diameter.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"And More Cornfield Circles in Canada." Paul Norman. Flying
|
||
|
Saucer Review, vol. 35, no. 1 (March Quarter, 1990), pp. 8-9.
|
||
|
(Briefly discusses 1989 circles between 6 and 24 meters in
|
||
|
diameter in Manitoba; 2 photos.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Mysterious circles." Andrew Phillips, Macleans, Aug. 13,
|
||
|
1990, pp. 46-47.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"The Hertfordshire 'Mowing Devil' Woodcut: A 17th Century
|
||
|
Circle Report?" Jenny Randles. UFO Times, no. 5 (January
|
||
|
1990), pp. 30-32. (Presents a 1678 woodcut showing a devil
|
||
|
"mowing" a pattern which Randles suggests may be a crop cir-
|
||
|
cle.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Swirled Landing Trace?" Carol and Rex Salisberry. MUFON UFO
|
||
|
Journal, no. 264 (April 1990), pp. 3-7. (A Gulf Breeze crop
|
||
|
circle.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Field Of Dreams?" Dava Sobel. Omni, December 1990, pp. 59-
|
||
|
128.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Graffiti of the Gods?" Dennis Stacy. New Age Journal,
|
||
|
Jan/Feb. 1991, pp. 38-103. (A thorough overview.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Hoping Some Furry Little Creatures Crop Up." Calvin Trillin.
|
||
|
Syndicated newspaper column, August 13, 1990. (A humorous
|
||
|
look at the circles.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Multiple stories, multiple authors, Fortean Times, issues 53
|
||
|
and 55 (sorry, dates not known.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Studies
|
||
|
-------
|
||
|
"North American Crop Circles and Related Physical Traces in
|
||
|
1990." Released February 1991. 18pp. Conducted by NAICCR
|
||
|
(North American Institute for Crop Circle Research.) For
|
||
|
information, write to NAICCR, 649 Silverstone Avenue, Winni-
|
||
|
peg, Manitoba R3T 2V8, Canada.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
**********************************************
|
||
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
||
|
**********************************************
|