376 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
376 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
|
WARNING: The following article contains critical spoiler information about
|
|||
|
this week's TNG episode, "The First Duty". Those not wishing to be caught
|
|||
|
off-guard by spoilers before seeing the show are advised to stand clear.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
My, that was surprisingly good!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A few little nitpicks here and there, but all in all I really enjoyed this.
|
|||
|
More after Ye Olde Synoppe, Sis:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As the Enterprise heads to Starfleet Academy for Picard's commencement
|
|||
|
address, Picard receives word of an accident in which Wes was involved while
|
|||
|
he and his flight team, the Nova Squadron, were practicing maneuvers. He's
|
|||
|
fine, but one of the team members, Josh Albert, was killed, and an
|
|||
|
investigation is underway, headed by Admiral Brand, the Academy
|
|||
|
superintendent. Picard offers to help, but there's no need.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picard explores the grounds before the hearing, and finds the old
|
|||
|
groundskeeper Boothby, who helped him through trying times when he was a
|
|||
|
student there. Boothby dismisses Picard's attempts at thanks, saying that
|
|||
|
what Picard's done with his life since is thanks enough, and that he didn't
|
|||
|
do anything. "You knew what you had to do, what was the right thing. I just
|
|||
|
made sure you listened to yourself." Meanwhile, the squadron leader,
|
|||
|
Nicholas Locarno, gives the squadron a pep talk before the hearing, saying
|
|||
|
that everything will be fine--as long as they stick together. Nick
|
|||
|
testifies, saying that while in a "diamond-slot" formation, they entered a
|
|||
|
maneuver called a Jaeger loop, and that nine seconds later, Josh Albert's
|
|||
|
ship crashed into another cadet's, causing the eventual destruction of all
|
|||
|
five ships.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Cadet Hajar, the cadet whose ship Josh crashed into, testifies that the ships
|
|||
|
did not deviate from their flight plan--and when pressed, admits that they
|
|||
|
did, but by amounts small enough that she didn't feel it was important. She
|
|||
|
also claims not to have seen Josh break formation, being unaware of a problem
|
|||
|
until her proximity alarm went off. Cadet Sito, who was in the rear, also
|
|||
|
claimed not to have, saying she was flying only on sensor readings at the
|
|||
|
time--but when pressed, cannot even describe the orientation of Josh's ship.
|
|||
|
Nick breaks in, saying that lately, Josh had been having "difficulties" in
|
|||
|
formation flying, and that he must have panicked. Admiral Brand is very
|
|||
|
disturbed by this news, and adjourns the hearing until the following day,
|
|||
|
when data from Wes's flight recorder should be ready. "Everything's fine,"
|
|||
|
Nick tells Wes. "Trust me."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As Picard, citing Wes as "one of our own", asks Geordi and Data to examine
|
|||
|
the evidence themselves, Wes protests Nick lying at the investigation, saying
|
|||
|
that he said no one would have to lie. Nick responds by saying that he
|
|||
|
*didn't* lie, that Josh probably did panic and "we all know it".
|
|||
|
Reluctantly, Sito and Hajar agree. Nick says that the only data recoverable
|
|||
|
from Wes's recorder is all before the collision, so that as long as Wes
|
|||
|
doesn't volunteer extra information, all will be fine. And after all, as
|
|||
|
Sito points out, if they said what *really* happened, they all might as well
|
|||
|
start packing. Nick tells Wes that he knows what it's like to count on a
|
|||
|
team for his life, since he's been out in space.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Despite qualms about this, compounded by Josh's father apologizing to Wes for
|
|||
|
Josh letting them all down, Wes sticks to the story when describing the
|
|||
|
recorder's data. He adds nothing, and when asked whether the ships remained
|
|||
|
in formation just after the Jaeger loop, firmly says yes. Data from a
|
|||
|
navigational satellite around Saturn is then shown, proving without a doubt
|
|||
|
that the ships were NOT in formation seven seconds after the loop was
|
|||
|
completed. "What is your explanation, Mister Crusher?" "I have none, sir."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Beverly attempts to comfort Wes, but her firm belief that the data was
|
|||
|
somehow tampered with to frame Wes only upsets him more, and he begs her not
|
|||
|
to try to protect him from any of this. Picard talks to Boothby, and finds
|
|||
|
that the Nova Squadron is considered heroes by the entire Academy, and that
|
|||
|
Nick Locarno's personal charm and magnetism is what holds the team together.
|
|||
|
"If he asked them to do something," Boothby says, "they'd do it. Even if it
|
|||
|
means going right over a cliff." When Geordi and Data find that Wes's
|
|||
|
coolant interlock was open just before the crash, and that one of the reasons
|
|||
|
for doing that is to purge drive plasma (a dangerous move likely to ignite
|
|||
|
the plasma), Picard realizes that that's exactly what they were trying to
|
|||
|
do...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picard calls Wes into his ready room and shows him a simulation of a maneuver
|
|||
|
known as the Kolvord Starburst--a very flashy, very spectacular, and very
|
|||
|
dangerous flight stunt. It's been banned at the Academy for over a hundred
|
|||
|
years, ever since a group of cadets tried it and failed, all five losing
|
|||
|
their lives in the process. Picard reasons that Nick Locarno wanted his
|
|||
|
Academy career to go out with a blaze of glory, and that he talked the rest
|
|||
|
of them into learning the stunt, and then covering up the truth when disaster
|
|||
|
ensued. When he asks Wesley if that is correct, Wes first remains silent,
|
|||
|
then chooses not to answer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picard is livid, for Wes has already *given* an answer to the inquiry, and
|
|||
|
that answer was a lie. Wes protests that it was not a lie, but Picard
|
|||
|
angrily points out that "a lie of omission is still a lie!" He reminds Wes
|
|||
|
of his first day on board, when even annoyed at Wes's apparent presumption on
|
|||
|
the bridge, Picard was impressed at the depth of his knowledge. He goes on
|
|||
|
to say that ever since he made Wes an acting ensign, he'd always been
|
|||
|
convinced that Wes would be a superb officer--until now. "The first duty of
|
|||
|
a Starfleet officer is to the truth--be it scientific truth, historical
|
|||
|
truth, PERSONAL truth. It is the guiding principle on which Starfleet was
|
|||
|
founded!" And, he continues, if Wes cannot face up to the truth, then he
|
|||
|
doesn't *deserve* to wear a Starfleet uniform. Picard presents Wes with a
|
|||
|
simple choice: either Wes tells Admiral Brand what really happened, or
|
|||
|
Picard will. Period. End of discussion--and Picard shouts Wes out of the
|
|||
|
room.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Wes, panicked, tells Nick that Picard knows everything. Nick, upon hearing
|
|||
|
Picard has no evidence, says there's no problem, that all they need to do is
|
|||
|
deny Picard's theory. Wes balks at this, unable to call Picard a liar--but
|
|||
|
Nick lambastes Wes for having the arrogance to decide the fates of all four
|
|||
|
of them by his own single actions. He says that the team, Nova Squadron, is
|
|||
|
bigger than any one of them. He says that without hesitation, if he were in
|
|||
|
Wes's position he'd resign his commission rather than turn the team in, and
|
|||
|
he urges Wes to do the same.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The hearing comes to a close. Brand says she is very disappointed and
|
|||
|
disturbed by the inconsistencies between the data and the squadron's
|
|||
|
statements, and says it suggests that they have been lying. However, since
|
|||
|
they have no proof, they close the investigation by only giving them each a
|
|||
|
formal reprimand and terminating their flight privileges. "This hearing is
|
|||
|
concluded."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Sir." Wesley rises. "I would like to add something to my testimony..."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Wes confesses all, and tells Josh's father outright that Josh didn't let them
|
|||
|
down. Nick, when asked if he has anything to add, simply says no.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Later, Picard talks to Wesley on the grounds. Nick has been expelled, and
|
|||
|
the rest of them nearly were--except that Nick pleaded to take full
|
|||
|
responsibility, saying that he pressured them all into it. As he said he
|
|||
|
would, Nick went down for the team. Wes feels awful, but Picard isn't
|
|||
|
finished. In addition to the reprimand, Wes's credits for the year have been
|
|||
|
revoked, and he will not advance with his class--he will pay for his actions.
|
|||
|
And what's more, he'll remain on campus, with everyone knowing what he did.
|
|||
|
"You have difficult times ahead."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Wes stares at the ground, downcast.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"You knew what you had to do. I just made sure that you listened to
|
|||
|
yourself. Goodbye, Cadet."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Goodbye, Captain." The two part company.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, now that that's over...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Y'know, I'm really starting to wonder why series *dedicated* to "courtroom
|
|||
|
drama" don't attract me more. This was, in some ways, the functional
|
|||
|
successor to "The Measure of a Man" and "The Drumhead" in its focus on a
|
|||
|
particular investigation; and like the above two shows, it was highly
|
|||
|
enjoyable.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I expect some will complain that the plot was too predictable, or too
|
|||
|
straightforward in some way. I don't quite agree. Yes, the grand design
|
|||
|
unfolded about the way I expected it to, but the little twists and turns it
|
|||
|
took getting there did not. Some examples:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We all knew that Wes would come through with the truth eventually.
|
|||
|
BUT: I didn't expect him to stonewall as long as he did, or to refuse to
|
|||
|
answer a *direct question from Picard*.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We all knew that Locarno would push as many hot buttons as he could and
|
|||
|
attempt to dissuade Wes from talking, and that he was mostly to blame.
|
|||
|
BUT: I certainly was surprised to find out at the end that his "the team is
|
|||
|
more important than the individual" speech was sincere enough that he was
|
|||
|
willing to sacrifice himself for the team. That was a big surprise.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I, for one, had a feeling from the preview and past experience that Picard
|
|||
|
was somehow going to end up intimately involved with the investigation.
|
|||
|
Fortunately, he didn't. Yes, the Enterprise certainly got involved--but they
|
|||
|
didn't have to, and Picard's request to formally assist was turned down
|
|||
|
outright. Picard decided to help because "Wesley's one of our own"--a rather
|
|||
|
strong acknowledgement and indication of the depth of TNG's relationships.
|
|||
|
Nice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Another interesting character bit was Bev's absolute "my-son-can-do-no-wrong"
|
|||
|
naivete even after it was rather clear that Wes's story didn't hold up. Now,
|
|||
|
Picard or Riker might have very well said similar things to Wes that Bev did
|
|||
|
there (i.e. "I know you're telling the truth, but we need to..."), but they'd
|
|||
|
have done it with ulterior motives: to try to guilt-trip Wes into confessing
|
|||
|
by himself. Beverly looked and sounded *absolutely sincere*. That's almost
|
|||
|
scary, but hardly out of character. I found it quite interesting. (Along
|
|||
|
similar lines, her reaction to hearing of Wes's accident seemed very right as
|
|||
|
well; knowing it rationally, but falling apart deep down anyway.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'll get back to characterization later, but a bit on the actual plot itself.
|
|||
|
It seemed pretty solidly put together, for the most part. One small
|
|||
|
objection I did have was the oft-used "the Enterprise solves the mystery when
|
|||
|
no one else can" bit. It's less objectionable here than it's been
|
|||
|
occasionally, but I saw no obvious reason from within the story why the
|
|||
|
Enterprise crew could figure it out when the Academy investigators couldn't.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Actually, I should amend that. The investigators might well have noticed the
|
|||
|
cooling interlocks open, as Data and Geordi did. All we'd need is for them
|
|||
|
not to make the connection to the Kolvord Starburst that Picard did. That's
|
|||
|
possible, though a tad unlikely; and it does beg the question of just why
|
|||
|
Picard knows it so well.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Beyond that, everything hung together quite well, I thought. The initial
|
|||
|
"there's been an accident..." teaser was quite a surprise for those seeing
|
|||
|
the preview; and for those who didn't, it probably suggested he'd been badly
|
|||
|
hurt, or even killed. Nicely misdirected (and it was *another* short teaser;
|
|||
|
hmm, I see a trend :-) ). The investigation was methodical, and certainly
|
|||
|
didn't make out the investigators to be complete dunces, as has occasionally
|
|||
|
happened in the past. This time they were very suspicious, and with good
|
|||
|
reason--they just couldn't prove it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(Incidentally, Wes's choice could have been made much easier, and *wasn't*.
|
|||
|
Picard could well have pointed out that even if Picard *did* speak and was
|
|||
|
contradicted, Wes would be working under a cloud of suspicion for years if
|
|||
|
not decades after graduating, and he damn sure wouldn't be able to serve
|
|||
|
within a kiloparsec of the Enterprise. The fact that Picard didn't use that,
|
|||
|
and let Wes decide on slightly more abstract grounds, speaks well of him and
|
|||
|
of those crafting the show.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Incidentally, this marks the writing debut of TNG advisor Naren Shankar. And
|
|||
|
while I know you're going to have cautions accepting this after I was
|
|||
|
deceived with respect to "Violations", this time the writer really *IS* a
|
|||
|
friend of a friend. He's been, if I remember rightly, a technical advisor of
|
|||
|
sorts to TNG for a few years (and yes, "Yesterday's Enterprise" NARENdra III
|
|||
|
is named for him), but he's finally broken through into scripting. Nicely
|
|||
|
done, too (and we've never met or corresponded, so I don't think there's any
|
|||
|
bias at play here). (I also, to be fair, don't know how much of this was
|
|||
|
Naren Shankar and how much was Ron Moore--both were credited.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This also means that the science was slightly more on-the-ball than usual.
|
|||
|
Not much needed to be done, but it was nice to see more astronomical
|
|||
|
terminology than usual done (for example, not that many writers use moons of
|
|||
|
Saturn other than Titan, and it was nice to hear Mimas brought up), and at
|
|||
|
least enough sense to acknowledge that, for example, statistical mechanics
|
|||
|
*is* one of the most mathematics-intensive fields of physics. It's a minor
|
|||
|
point, mostly, but it was interesting.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Most of the guest cast were good. My main objection here is to Richard Fancy
|
|||
|
as Satelk--he made a truly miserable, and *dull*, Vulcan. I think this was
|
|||
|
an acting (or maybe directing?) problem more than one of the writing; his
|
|||
|
actual questions seemed to be fairly short and to the point. His demeanor
|
|||
|
and tone of voice, however, screamed anything BUT Vulcan to me. Not a good
|
|||
|
choice. On the other hand, Jacqueline Brooks' Admiral Brand really *is* a
|
|||
|
lot like several school principals I've known, and Picard's comments about
|
|||
|
her early on rang true. (That conversation of comparing superindentents in
|
|||
|
the teaser, BTW, was another nice scene.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ray Walston was a superb Boothby. I have to admit that when I initially
|
|||
|
heard he was playing the part, I had qualms; memories of "My Favorite
|
|||
|
Martian" were too strong. :-) But he played Boothby rather as I'd expected
|
|||
|
the character to be: rather piercingly observant, but also rather surly and
|
|||
|
taciturn about it. Yes, it's a bit of a stereotype, but he played it well
|
|||
|
enough that I'm willing to forgive it. (It wouldn't have worked without the
|
|||
|
link to Picard, either; that set up a lot of interesting parallels.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ed Lauter was an interesting LCDR Albert (the dead cadet's father). He was
|
|||
|
tough to get a handle on, but he seemed a very sensibly written character,
|
|||
|
and inadvertently pushed all the right buttons with Wes when he returned
|
|||
|
Wes's sweater. Interesting.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The two cadets of Nova Squadron besides Wes and Locarno (Hajar and Sito) were
|
|||
|
fine--nothing seemed particularly wonderful, but they didn't need to do much.
|
|||
|
They did manage to get across a certain ambivalence about what they were
|
|||
|
doing, which played up Locarno's magnetism in creating the whole mess in the
|
|||
|
first place. Locarno's "we three have no problem with this" and "we all know
|
|||
|
it" obviously made assumptions it shouldn't--and that was the point. So,
|
|||
|
they certainly did what they needed to.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Then, there's Nick Locarno. I thought he went slightly overboard in his final
|
|||
|
scene with Wes, but only slightly. Apart from that, he definitely managed to
|
|||
|
give off the air of, as Boothby put it, "coach, surrogate father, and best
|
|||
|
friend all in one" to the rest of Nova Squadron. He really felt like a born
|
|||
|
leader--and as I'm sure others noticed, he seemed rather a Kirk-figure in
|
|||
|
many ways (right down to the way he walked at times). His arguments started
|
|||
|
to ring false for me in his final scene with Wes, which wasn't so good--but
|
|||
|
the revelation at the end that he truly meant every one of them, to the point
|
|||
|
of taking the fall himself, lends a bit of poignancy to the whole thing.
|
|||
|
Very, very nice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
And finally, we have Wes. Written to perfection, for possibly the first
|
|||
|
time. And performed to perfection, for possibly the first time. I don't
|
|||
|
know precisely what I can say here. The story was written around three
|
|||
|
people: Wes, and his two surrogate fathers (Locarno and Picard). He had to
|
|||
|
choose and he did; and he chose well.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The regulars were...well, were basically Picard and Bev, first of all;
|
|||
|
nobody else had more than three minutes of air-time. I've already taken care
|
|||
|
of Bev; she was fine, and also far less essential. Picard was *superb*.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The best example of this, and in fact the best character interplay I've seen
|
|||
|
in months, had to be the Picard/Wes scene in his ready room. I could not
|
|||
|
stop watching--literally. The scene, more than anything else, illustrated
|
|||
|
just how strong Picard's fatherly feelings are for Wesley, and just *how*
|
|||
|
upset and let down by Wes's actions he was. I honestly thought for a second
|
|||
|
when Wes chose not to answer (a shocker in itself) that Picard was going to
|
|||
|
slap him. (Of course, Picard's patented Withering Stare is much worse...
|
|||
|
:-) ) Picard was truly stunned by Wes's stonewalling, and almost lost
|
|||
|
complete control--he certainly ended up at the boiling point. Locarno's
|
|||
|
"must have been a hell of a speech" was probably just the wrong thing to say,
|
|||
|
because it WAS a hell of a speech; everyone I've talked to felt vicariously
|
|||
|
guilty after hearing it. The Picard/Wes relationship is probably the most
|
|||
|
evolved of the entire show, and this demonstrated that to all watching. I
|
|||
|
can't praise this scene enough.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The direction was mostly good, though not top-notch. It was fairly dynamic
|
|||
|
in some cases (the slow pan around the "courtroom" in several of the
|
|||
|
investigation scenes, for example), and that mostly worked. And *most* of
|
|||
|
the closeups worked--certainly, that of Wes when the navigational data
|
|||
|
appears did, as did Picard's shocked stare at Wes when he refuses to answer.
|
|||
|
The only one I really remember as jarring was the very first one of Admiral
|
|||
|
Brand when she's addressing the hall--that one just seemed unnecessary and
|
|||
|
out of place.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The very few other problems I had were simply of things we didn't see. I'd
|
|||
|
have liked to see at least one scene with Beverly *after* Wes's confession,
|
|||
|
or at least after Picard finds out what Wes has done. I'd have liked to see
|
|||
|
one scene between Boothby and Wes. I'd have liked to see the final scene
|
|||
|
between Wes and Picard go on slightly longer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
But that's a wish list--not necessarily a realistic fault-finding.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Finally, the conclusion was nice to see, in that we saw that actions *do have
|
|||
|
consequences*, and that Wes *did* get taken down a few pegs for his rashness.
|
|||
|
I know an awful lot of fans who have been wanting for years to see Wes
|
|||
|
actually do something wrong and get nailed for it, and I rather suspect Wil
|
|||
|
Wheaton's felt the same way. This did it, in spades. (As a corollary, of
|
|||
|
course, if everything's fine and dandy with no references to this next time
|
|||
|
we see Wes, I shall be quite displeased.) Picard's earlier scenes with
|
|||
|
Boothby, while in part a major tease (just what DID Picard do?), also served
|
|||
|
to set up a lot of good parallels with the finale. One wonders if Picard
|
|||
|
will ever tell anyone that he was behind Wes's coming forward. (I doubt it.)
|
|||
|
Nice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now, some short takes:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--I absolutely adored that SFA logo Okuda and Sternbach put right before the
|
|||
|
navigational tape played. It's the sort of thing that will be on jackets in
|
|||
|
six months, I assure you--but it also looked fantastic. ("Scientia ex
|
|||
|
astra"--knowledge out of the stars. Ahh.) And now that they've decided the
|
|||
|
Federation was founded in 2161, I notice the staffers are putting that date
|
|||
|
in wherever they get a chance. :-)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--Picard's bit about "the first duty...is to the truth, be it scientific
|
|||
|
truth, historical truth, *personal truth*...", in addition to being nicely
|
|||
|
stated, strikes me as something that could be a very subtle slam at the wave
|
|||
|
of "Holocaust Revisionists" that are appearing more and more these days. No
|
|||
|
argument here.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--Did my eyes deceive me, or was the sweater Wes loaned Josh one of those
|
|||
|
rainbow sweaters from his first season? Boy, Josh must have been
|
|||
|
small--there's no way those things fit Wes any more! :-) (Unless he
|
|||
|
continued to wear that fashion afterward...oh, no, it's too horrible to
|
|||
|
contemplate...)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--Possibly the best line of the show (certainly the best nonserious one):
|
|||
|
"What happened to your hair?"
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--A Betazoid superintendent...brrr, what a thought. Could you imagine
|
|||
|
Lwaxana Troi as a principal? The mind boggles.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--I'm trying to figure out exactly what school "the game against Minsk"
|
|||
|
referred to. Is there another campus for the Academy, or is this a
|
|||
|
completely different *type* of school? Any ideas?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, that ought to do it. It wasn't quite perfect, but it was a good watch,
|
|||
|
and a very solid outing. Good luck, Wes; see you next season.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So, the numbers:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Plot: 9. A mild problem with why the Enterprise crew figured out what
|
|||
|
happened while the investigators didn't, but otherwise solid.
|
|||
|
Plot Handling: 9. Not quite stunning, but very nice.
|
|||
|
Characterization: 9. If Locarno had been *ever* so slightly less over-the-
|
|||
|
top in his last scene with Wes, and if Satelk had been even
|
|||
|
remotely convincing, this would be higher.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL: Looks like a 9. Very nice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NEXT WEEK: A rerun, so we all get a breather...phew. :-)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Tim Lynch (Cornell's first Astronomy B.A.; one of many Caltech grad students)
|
|||
|
BITNET: tlynch@citjuliet
|
|||
|
INTERNET: tlynch@juliet.caltech.edu
|
|||
|
UUCP: ...!ucbvax!tlynch%juliet.caltech.edu@hamlet.caltech.edu
|
|||
|
"We thought we could do it. We thought we could do ANYTHING..."
|
|||
|
--W. Crusher
|
|||
|
--
|
|||
|
Copyright 1992, Timothy W. Lynch. All rights reserved, but feel free to ask...
|