96 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
96 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A Libertarian Outlook
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
by Gerald Schneider, Ph.D.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With housing costs so high, I am reminded of the need for
|
|||
|
affordable housing, especially for the poor. What we lack are
|
|||
|
public policies that provide affordable but sound shelter in
|
|||
|
honest and competent ways.
|
|||
|
Government money and oversight are not the answer.
|
|||
|
Government housing programs, in fact, are unfair, inept, and
|
|||
|
counterproductive. They reward government bureaucrats with high-
|
|||
|
salaried jobs taken from tax revenues intended for the needy, not
|
|||
|
the greedy. But not nearly enough of that money filters down to
|
|||
|
the poor to solve their housing dilemma.
|
|||
|
What can be done? Some suggestions follow:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Get Government Out of Housing
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Phase out all government-owned housing, giving title to
|
|||
|
apartments and buildings to tenants. Allow tenants to arrange
|
|||
|
whatever ownership pattern they want (condominium, cooperative,
|
|||
|
etc.). Alert nonprofit and other private organizations that
|
|||
|
counsel tenants on ownership about the phase-out.
|
|||
|
Dissolve the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
|
|||
|
Development (HUD) at the same time. Ditto for local government
|
|||
|
housing agencies. Those expensive government bureaucracies, of
|
|||
|
doubtful value to begin with, would no longer be necessary.
|
|||
|
Millions of dollars would be saved!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Establish Individual Ownership
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Assure "squatters" living in abandoned buildings that
|
|||
|
government authorities will not toss them out just for living
|
|||
|
there. This assurance of a "home" might even encourage squatters
|
|||
|
to upgrade their living quarters through "sweat equity." Self-
|
|||
|
pride of "ownership," even if temporary, could give new
|
|||
|
incentives to squatters to improve their lives, too.
|
|||
|
Permanent ownership by serious, long-term squatters on
|
|||
|
genuinely abandoned or government-owned vacated property should
|
|||
|
be allowed. Programs of urban and rural "homesteading" could be
|
|||
|
renewed and expanded.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Relax Apartment Regulations
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Laws that restrict or restrain homeowners from creating
|
|||
|
apartments in underused single-family houses should be relaxed.
|
|||
|
Such apartments could be provided quickly at low cost in contrast
|
|||
|
to the time and expense for new construction. And apartments
|
|||
|
added in that manner require no new infrastructure of streets,
|
|||
|
sewers, and public amenities.
|
|||
|
Also, the extra income from secondary apartments in single-
|
|||
|
family houses could help needy homeowners become financially
|
|||
|
independent. The elderly, for example, may live in houses larger
|
|||
|
than they need because their children are gone. While the houses
|
|||
|
may be mortgage free, the burden of government taxes can be
|
|||
|
unbearable. Rental money from secondary apartments in their
|
|||
|
houses can make the difference.
|
|||
|
Properly enforced nuisance and negligence laws would resolve
|
|||
|
neighborhood problems, if any, that secondary apartments in
|
|||
|
single-family houses cause. Government licensing and approval
|
|||
|
laws for these secondary apartments only frighten people away
|
|||
|
from creating them.
|
|||
|
More boarding houses should be allowed by local government
|
|||
|
authorities. There is nothing wrong with people who have their
|
|||
|
own bedrooms sharing a bathroom and kitchen. Costs for such
|
|||
|
units would be relatively low, and, while this arrangement is not
|
|||
|
for everyone, it would be better than many street alternatives.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Eliminate Zoning Obstacles
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Finally, zoning laws and building codes that make new
|
|||
|
housing needlessly costly should be ended. This includes
|
|||
|
politically determined land-use density and building height
|
|||
|
rules. Government should not stifle innovation for low-cost
|
|||
|
housing through enforcement of outmoded and rigid construction
|
|||
|
standards.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Reprinted from THE WHEATON NEWS of Wheaton, Maryland, Nov.
|
|||
|
25, 1987. For a one year subscription to Mr. Schneider's biweekly
|
|||
|
"Libertarian Outlook" column, send $15 to: Gerald Schneider, 8750
|
|||
|
Georgia Ave., Suite 1410-B, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Copyright
|
|||
|
1987 Gerald Schneider, Ph.D.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(This is the text of one of a series of eight topical Libertarian
|
|||
|
outreach leaflets produced by the Libertarian Party of Skagit
|
|||
|
County, WA. The leaflets have a panel with National LP member-
|
|||
|
ship information, with a space for other LP groups to stamp their
|
|||
|
own address and phone number. Samples and a bulk price list/
|
|||
|
order form are available from: Libertarian Party of Skagit
|
|||
|
County, P.O. Box 512, Anacortes, WA 98221.)
|
|||
|
|