99 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
99 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
JOAN on the Witch Laws 8/22/81
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note: These are the comments of one of the early members of Proteus
|
|||
|
Coven on what we gave her to read about ethics and laws. All the
|
|||
|
material she had is still here, although a good deal has been added
|
|||
|
since then, so I thought her comments would also be interesting.
|
|||
|
Judy
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Reaction to "Traditional" - i.e. essentially Gardnerian - format
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In many respects, as constricting as Catholocism without the
|
|||
|
administrative experience, intellectual prowess, or verbal expertise of
|
|||
|
Catholicism. If current researchers are correct, what we have is one
|
|||
|
man't fantasy (with jumbled and skewed sources) made everyone's
|
|||
|
obligation.
|
|||
|
May be dealt with most effectively - especially as regards the
|
|||
|
reality of current practice and expectation - by juxtaposition with
|
|||
|
Lady Ikandkhop's masterful irony.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Reaction to Aporrheton 5 - [generally very good thinking, but still
|
|||
|
more traditional than my preference]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Paragraph Two: Good thinking on nature of Goddess - or any divinity. My
|
|||
|
agreement is reserved, uncertain, withheld.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Paragraph Three: Claims to have arrived at FIRMLY ("no bending")
|
|||
|
UNDISPROVEN hypotheses. This arouses natural suspicion in me. I
|
|||
|
disagree with some of his perceptions of FACTS.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I disagree violently with Laws 5 + 6. Heterosexuality is a strength,
|
|||
|
but not an essential. POLARITY OPERATES OUTSIDE [or INSIDE] BOUNDARIES
|
|||
|
OF ANATOMICAL EQUIPMENT AND HORMONES.
|
|||
|
AND THE CHARACTER - THE SACRED CHARACTER - OF THE WITCH IS WITHIN
|
|||
|
THE AT ONCE TRANSCENDANT AND DISCIPLINED SELF.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #7 is unnecessary. A silly bow to a misunderstood "Trad" law.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #8 is largely true, but makes no allowance for valid, honest (fair
|
|||
|
to all), and necessary transitional states many must pass through. Also
|
|||
|
sticks on "authority" peg, which has some necessity/validity but can
|
|||
|
easily get out of hand. I find HONESTY + COURTESY better yardsticks.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #9. True. But much of interpersonal tension (inevitable) can be
|
|||
|
worked out of God/dess' love and coven support-with-discipline prevail.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #10. The Great Mysteries must be lived out. And, without using
|
|||
|
Craft parlance, if another needs to hear them, they MUST BE VERBALIZED.
|
|||
|
TO DO LESS IS HARM.
|
|||
|
i.e., it is to allow another to drown when you're on shore and have
|
|||
|
a rope.
|
|||
|
But no missionary zeal!
|
|||
|
No proseletyzing!!!
|
|||
|
That for which others are unready is foolishness for them and
|
|||
|
foolishness for the Witch. (It may also be subconscious power tripping.
|
|||
|
See agreement in Law #13.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #11 - I agree with paragraphs one and two.
|
|||
|
Paragraph 3: saying that only the HPs incarnates the Goddess is
|
|||
|
inappropriate and - in my firm opinion - NOT FACTUAL. (note from Judy -
|
|||
|
as I interpret what he says there, it's that only WOMEN incarnate the
|
|||
|
Goddess. I also disagree with that, but it's less bad than Joan's
|
|||
|
reading that he limits it to the HPs only.) The Goddess is not bound by
|
|||
|
ceremonial elevations. She incarnates where and when She Damn Well
|
|||
|
Pleases!
|
|||
|
Re: "all initiations ..." - etc. - Ritual is crystallization of
|
|||
|
preexistent, potential, incipient reality and this actualization is not
|
|||
|
trivial.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #12 - Good caution on limits (ill defined where emotion runs high)
|
|||
|
or self-defense. But assumption rules out solo magic (his previous
|
|||
|
premise is that it isn't Wiccan) by corollary of group responsibility /
|
|||
|
group danger to all action.
|
|||
|
"Return to sender" is generally agreed as rule-of-thumb for
|
|||
|
defense. Practice has not disproven. This is a difficult area to
|
|||
|
define. Probably group consensus on this would help.
|
|||
|
Does "impossibility factor" negate danger? How about the verbal
|
|||
|
escape clause sometimes used?
|
|||
|
Obviously, I'm less sure of boundaries on this one than on any
|
|||
|
other.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Law #13 - Good idea. Rather an ideal than a norm.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OMISSION: APORRHETON does not mention Balance or Polarity concept
|
|||
|
except in male/female context. But these are valuable and central
|
|||
|
concepts.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I got the feeling this person is still ruled by fragments of
|
|||
|
left-over fear.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Starhawk is GREAT. But many people will need more codification than she
|
|||
|
offers.
|
|||
|
|