72 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext
72 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
r
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Pliny the Younger (62-114 A.D.) wrte letters to Tarjan in 112 A.D. and
|
|||
|
these are sometimes used to prove Jesus's exsistance. In a letter to
|
|||
|
the Emperor Tarjan in 112 A.D. asking for instructions about how to deal
|
|||
|
with the Christians in the area of the Roman Empire that had been
|
|||
|
goverened, he describes the then current ceremonies and practices.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems: No one debates the fact that Christians worshipped back
|
|||
|
then and that they had elaborate ceremonies and such so
|
|||
|
it is useless in discussing the historicity of Jesus
|
|||
|
because it does not talk of his EXSISTANCE. This letter
|
|||
|
cannot be used to prove Jesus's Exsistance.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thallus works are lost but Julius Africanus in the 3rd century quotes
|
|||
|
Thallus's works and in his works Jesus's death is accompanied by an
|
|||
|
Earthquake and an unusual darkness that Thallus, according to Africanus,
|
|||
|
wrongly attributes to an eclipse of the sun. However, we have no clear
|
|||
|
idea when Thallus wrote his history or how accurate Africanus's account
|
|||
|
is.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems: No indication on this man Thallus other than he wrote as
|
|||
|
late as the 2nd century. His works could EASILY have
|
|||
|
been copied by others. Scholars widely accept this as
|
|||
|
useless data when concerning Jesus's Historicity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Flavius Josephus who wrote "The Antiquites of the Jews" wrote a passage
|
|||
|
that is by far the most quoted to PROVE that Jesus actually exsisted.
|
|||
|
It talkes of Jesus as such:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to
|
|||
|
call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works - a teacher of such
|
|||
|
men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many
|
|||
|
of the Jews and many of the gentiles. He was the Christ; and when
|
|||
|
Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned
|
|||
|
him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him,
|
|||
|
for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine
|
|||
|
prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things
|
|||
|
concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not
|
|||
|
extinct at this day."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems: This passage is almost entirely accepted as a forgery
|
|||
|
because of several things. First of all, Josephus was a
|
|||
|
Jew and he would have NEVER referred to this man as the
|
|||
|
"Christ". Next is that when this passage is taken IN
|
|||
|
CONTEXT with the chapter it does not fit. It looks
|
|||
|
perfectly like an insert. And lastly, Josephus would not
|
|||
|
have talked about Jesus in such a way because orthodox
|
|||
|
Jews (which he was) would not believe what he wrote and
|
|||
|
neither would he.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Talmund which was written primarily in the 1st to 2nd centuries A.D.
|
|||
|
is also another source which is quoted to prove that Jesus exsisted.
|
|||
|
The Talmund mentions a man named "Yeshu the Nazerene" who practiced
|
|||
|
Magic and commited heresy in the reigh of Alexander Jannaeus. Some of
|
|||
|
his 'disciples' that are listed with him are also party correlary with
|
|||
|
the disciples of Jesus.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems: Yeshu the Nazerene lived during the reign of Alexander
|
|||
|
Jannaeus who lived during 104-78 B.C. There is no way
|
|||
|
this could have been Jesus that is talked of in the
|
|||
|
bible.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Bible is another source that is quoted to prove that Jesus exsisted
|
|||
|
for it has a few details of dates and times and possibly can be used as
|
|||
|
a historical source.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems: The 4 accounts of Jesus's life are so framentary and
|
|||
|
in-correct that they cannot possible have any useful
|
|||
|
(** Cont **)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(R)eply, (E)mail reply, (F)orum-Op, (T)hread, (P)revious, or (N)ext? .... |