204 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
204 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
SHORT TALK BULLETIN - Vol.IX May,1931 No.5
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FIVE POINTS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
by: Unknown
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Five Points of Fellowship, as every Master Masons knows, contain
|
|||
|
the essence of the doctrine of brotherhood. But many a new brother
|
|||
|
asks, pertinently, <20>why are they called <20>Points?<3F>
|
|||
|
In the Old Constitutions, as explained in the Hallowell or Regius
|
|||
|
manuscript, are fifteen regulations, called <20>points.<2E> The old verse
|
|||
|
runs:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Fifteen artyculus there they soughton And fifteen poyntys there
|
|||
|
they wrogton.<2E>
|
|||
|
Translated into easy English, this reads:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Fifteen articles there they sought And fifteen points there they
|
|||
|
wrought.<2E>
|
|||
|
Phillips <20>New World of Words,<2C> published in 1706, defines <20>point<6E> as
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>a head, or chief matter.<2E> Moreover, an operative Masons <20>points<74>
|
|||
|
the seams of as wall by filling in the chinks left in laying bricks
|
|||
|
or stone, thus completing the structure.
|
|||
|
In older days of the Speculative Art there were <20>twelve original
|
|||
|
points<EFBFBD> as we learn from the old English lectures, done away with by
|
|||
|
the United Grand Lodge of England at the time of the reconciliation
|
|||
|
of 1813. They were introduced by the following passage:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>There are in Freemasonry twelve original points, which form the
|
|||
|
basis of the system and comprehend the whole ceremony of initiation.
|
|||
|
Without the existence of these points, no man ever was, or can be,
|
|||
|
legally and essentially received into the Order. Every person who is
|
|||
|
made a Mason must go through these twelve forms and ceremonies, not
|
|||
|
only in the first degree, but in every subsequent one.<2E>
|
|||
|
The twelve points were: Opening, Preparation, Report, Entrance,
|
|||
|
Prayer, Circumambulation , Advancing. Obligation, Investure,
|
|||
|
Northeast Corner and Closing; and each was symbolized by one of the
|
|||
|
Twelve Tribes of Israel for ingenious reasons not necessary to set
|
|||
|
forth here.
|
|||
|
The twelve original points were never introduced into the United
|
|||
|
States, and are now no longer used in England, although the
|
|||
|
ceremonies which they typify, of course, are integral parts of all
|
|||
|
Masonic rituals.
|
|||
|
Our Five Points of Fellowship are not allied to these, except as they
|
|||
|
are reflected in the word <20>points.<2E> We also find this relationship
|
|||
|
in the Perfect Points of our Entrance, once called Principal Points.
|
|||
|
Dr. Oliver, famous, learned and not always accurate Masonic student
|
|||
|
and writer (1782-1867) sums up the Five Points in his <20>Landmarks,<2C> as
|
|||
|
follows:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Assisting a brother in his distress, supporting him in his virtuous
|
|||
|
undertakings, praying for his welfare, keeping inviolate his secrets
|
|||
|
and vindicating his reputation as well in his absence as in his
|
|||
|
presence.<2E>
|
|||
|
by which it will be seen that in Oliver<65>s day the Five Points were
|
|||
|
not exactly as they are with us now.
|
|||
|
Strange though it seems, a change was made in the symbolism of the
|
|||
|
Five Points as recently as 1842, at the Baltimore Masonic Convention.
|
|||
|
Prior to that time, according to Cole, the Five Points were
|
|||
|
symbolized by hand, foot, knee, breast and back. After 1842, the
|
|||
|
hand was omitted, and the mouth and ear tacked on as the fifth.
|
|||
|
Mackey believed that:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>The omission of the first and the insertion of the last are
|
|||
|
innovations and the enumeration given by Cole is the old and genuine
|
|||
|
one which was originally taught in England by Preston and in his
|
|||
|
country by Webb.<2E>
|
|||
|
Some curiosities of ritual changes, though interesting, are more for
|
|||
|
the antiquarian than the average lodge member. Most of us are more
|
|||
|
concerned with a practical explanation of the Five Points as they
|
|||
|
have been taught for nearly a hundred years.
|
|||
|
For they have a practical explanation, which goes much more deeply
|
|||
|
into fraternal and brotherly relations than the ritual indicates.
|
|||
|
A man goes on foot a short distance by preference; for a longer
|
|||
|
journey he boards a street car, rides in an automobile, engages
|
|||
|
passage on a railroad or courses through the air in a plane. Service
|
|||
|
to our brethren on foot does not imply any special virtue in that
|
|||
|
means of transportation. The word expresses the willingness of him
|
|||
|
who would serve our own pleasure and refuse to travel merely because
|
|||
|
the means is not to our liking would hardly be Masonic.
|
|||
|
We assist our brethren when we can; also we serve them.
|
|||
|
The two terms are not interchangeable; we can not assist a brother
|
|||
|
with out serving, but we may serve him without assisting him. For a
|
|||
|
wholly negative action may be a service; suppose we have a just claim
|
|||
|
against him and, because of our Fraternal relations, we postpone
|
|||
|
pressing it. That is true service, but not active assistance, such
|
|||
|
as we might give if we gave or loaned him money to satisfy some
|
|||
|
other<EFBFBD>s claim.
|
|||
|
How far should we go <20>on foot<6F> to render service?
|
|||
|
Nothing is said in the ritual, but the cabletow is otherwise used as
|
|||
|
a measure of length. That same Baltimore Masonic Convention defined
|
|||
|
a cabletow<6F>s length as <20>the scope of a brothers reasonable ability.<2E>
|
|||
|
Across town may be too far for one, and across a continent not too
|
|||
|
far for another. In better words, our own conception of brotherhood
|
|||
|
must say how far we travel to help our brother.
|
|||
|
Mackey expressed thus:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Indolence should not cause our footsteps to halt, or wrath to turn
|
|||
|
them aside; but with eager alacrity and swiftness of foot, we should
|
|||
|
press forward in the exercise of charity and kindness to a distressed
|
|||
|
fellow creature.<2E>
|
|||
|
The petition at the Altar of the Great Architect of the Universe
|
|||
|
before engaging in any great and important undertaking is sound
|
|||
|
Masonic doctrine. To name the welfare of our brother in our
|
|||
|
petitions is good - but not for the reasons which the good Dr. Mackey
|
|||
|
set forth; the great Masonic student<6E>s pen slipped here, even as Jove
|
|||
|
has been known to nod! He Said:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>In our devotions to almighty God we should remember a brother<65>s
|
|||
|
welfare as our own, for the prayers of a fervent and sincere heart
|
|||
|
will find no less favor in the sight of heaven because the petition
|
|||
|
for self intermingles with aspirations of benevolence for a friend.<2E>
|
|||
|
Apparently we should pray for our friends because God will look with
|
|||
|
favor on an unselfish action on our part - which is un Masonic and
|
|||
|
selfish! Cole, writing years before Mackey (1817) said of his Third,
|
|||
|
our Second Point:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>When I offer up my ejaculations to Almighty God, a brother<65>s welfare
|
|||
|
I will remember as my own, for as the voices of babes and sucklings
|
|||
|
ascend to the Throne of Grace, so most assuredly will the breathings
|
|||
|
of a fervent heart arise to the mansions of bliss, as out prayers are
|
|||
|
certainly required of each other.<2E>
|
|||
|
This seems to be interpretable as meaning that we should pray for our
|
|||
|
brethren because we love them, and because, knowing our own need of
|
|||
|
their prayers, we realize their need of ours.
|
|||
|
Anciently, it was written <20>Laborare est orare,<2C> - to labor is to
|
|||
|
pray. If indeed prayer is labor, then to pray for our brethren we
|
|||
|
may labor for our brethren, which at once clarifies the Second Point
|
|||
|
and makes it a practical, everyday, do-it-now admonition. To work
|
|||
|
for our brother<65>s welfare is in the most brotherly manner to petition
|
|||
|
the Most High for him.
|
|||
|
We often associate with the idea of a <20>secret<65> something less than
|
|||
|
proper; <20>He has a secret in his life,<2C> <20>He is secretive.<2E> <20>He says
|
|||
|
one thing but in his secret heart he thinks another<65> are all
|
|||
|
expressions which seem to connote some degree of guilt with what is
|
|||
|
secret. We keep our brother<65>s secrets, guilty or innocent, but let
|
|||
|
us not assume that every secret is of a guilty variety. He may have
|
|||
|
a secret ambition, a secret joy, a secret hope - if he confides these
|
|||
|
to us, is our teaching merely to refuse to tell them, or to keep them
|
|||
|
in the fine old sense of that word - to hold, to guard. to preserve.
|
|||
|
The Keeper of the Door stands watch and ward, not to keep it from
|
|||
|
others, but to see that none use it improperly. Thus we are to keep
|
|||
|
the secret joys and ambitions of our brethren, close in our hearts,
|
|||
|
until he wants them known, but also by sympathy and understanding,
|
|||
|
helping him to maintain them.
|
|||
|
Even without this broad interpretation, the keeping of a brother<65>s
|
|||
|
confidence has more to it than mere silence. If he confides to us a
|
|||
|
guilty secret, since to betray him may not only make known that which
|
|||
|
he wishes hidden, but places him in danger. To betray a trust is
|
|||
|
never the act of a brother. In ordinary life an unsought trust does
|
|||
|
not carry with it responsibility to preserve it; in Freemasonry it
|
|||
|
does! No matter how we wish we did not share the secret, if it has
|
|||
|
been given us by a brother, we can not suffer our tongues to betray
|
|||
|
him, no matter what it costs us to remain silent, unless we forget
|
|||
|
alike our obligation and the Third Point.
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Do you stumble and fall, my brother? My hand is stretched out to
|
|||
|
prevent it. Do you need aid? My hand is yours - use it. It is your
|
|||
|
hand, for the time being. My strength is united to yours. You are
|
|||
|
not alone in your struggle - I stand with you on the Fourth of the
|
|||
|
Five Points, and as your need may be, so <20>Deo volente,<2C> will be my
|
|||
|
strength for you.<2E>
|
|||
|
So must we speak when the need comes. It makes no difference in what
|
|||
|
way our brother stumbles; it may be mentally; it may be spiritually;
|
|||
|
it may be materially; it may be morally. No exceptions are noted in
|
|||
|
our teachings. We are not told to stretch forth the hand in aid
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>If,<2C> and <20>perhaps,<2C> and <20>but!<21> Not for us to judge, to condemn, to
|
|||
|
admonish . . . for us only to put forth our strength unto our falling
|
|||
|
brother at his need, without question and without stint.
|
|||
|
For such is the Kingdom of Brotherhood.
|
|||
|
More sins are committed in the name of the Fifth of the Five Points
|
|||
|
than in the name of liberty! Too often we offer counsel when it is
|
|||
|
not advice but help that is needed. Too often we admonish of motes
|
|||
|
within our brother<65>s eye when our own vision is blinded by beams.
|
|||
|
What said the Lord? (Amos VII, in the Fellowcraft<66>s Degree.)
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Behold, I will set a plumb line in the midst of my people Israel; I
|
|||
|
will not again pass by them any more.<2E>
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>In the midst of my people Israel<65> - not in the far away land; not
|
|||
|
across the river; not up on the mountain top, but in the midst of
|
|||
|
them, an intimate personal individual plumb line!
|
|||
|
So are we to judge our brethren; not by the plumb, the square or the
|
|||
|
level that we are each taught to carry in our hearts, but by his
|
|||
|
plumb, his square, his level.
|
|||
|
If he build true by his own tools, we have no right to judge him by
|
|||
|
ours. The friendly reminders we must whisper to him are of incorrect
|
|||
|
building by his own plumb line. He may differ from us in opinion; he
|
|||
|
may be Republican where we are Democrat, Methodist where we are
|
|||
|
Baptist; Wet where we are Dry; Protectionist where we are Free trade;
|
|||
|
League of Nations proponent where we are <20>biter enders<72> - we must not
|
|||
|
judge him by the plumb line of our own beliefs.
|
|||
|
Only when we see him building untrue to his own tools have we the
|
|||
|
right to remind him of his faults. When we see a brave man
|
|||
|
shrinking, a virtuous man abandoning himself to vice, a good man
|
|||
|
acting as a criminal - then is his building faulty judged by his own
|
|||
|
plumb line and we may heed the Fifth of the Five Points and counsel
|
|||
|
and advise him to swing back, true to his own working tools.
|
|||
|
And finally, we do well to remember Mackey<65>s interpretation of the
|
|||
|
Fifth Point:
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>. . . we should never revile a brother<65>s character behind his back
|
|||
|
but rather, when attacked by others, support and defend it.<2E>
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>Speak no ill of the dead, since they can not defend themselves<65>
|
|||
|
might well have been written of the absent. In the Masonic sense no
|
|||
|
brother is absent if his brother is present, since then he has always
|
|||
|
a champion and defender, standing upon the Fifth Point as upon a
|
|||
|
rock.
|
|||
|
So considered - and this little paper is but a slender outline of how
|
|||
|
much and how far the Five Points extend - these teachings of Masonry,
|
|||
|
concerned wholly with the relations of brother to brother, become a
|
|||
|
broad and beautiful band of blue - the blue of the Blue Lodge - the
|
|||
|
True Blue of Brotherhood.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|