536 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
536 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
|
USBIC - United States Board of IRC Co-ordinators
|
||
|
|
||
|
This document was based upon the one created for OzBIC -- written by
|
||
|
Elizabeth Reid (emr@ee.mu.oz.au).
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. All administrators and operators of servers within the USA connected
|
||
|
to any USBIC server shall be members of USBIC, and abide by the
|
||
|
USBIC rules.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. The names, email address, and server affiliation of all USBIC
|
||
|
members should be freely available for FTP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.1 All server administrators who are able to make such a list
|
||
|
available for FTP must do so, and must advertise its availability
|
||
|
in their server's MOTD.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The USBIC rules should be freely available for FTP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3.1 All server administrators who are able to make the rules available
|
||
|
for FTP must do so, and must advertise its availability in their
|
||
|
server's MOTD.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. Voting is not compulsory where there is a call for votes on an
|
||
|
USBIC matter, however all USBIC members must have the opportunity
|
||
|
to vote.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.1 Everything possible must be done (including making long-distance
|
||
|
telephone calls to vacationing USBIC members) to ensure that
|
||
|
members have a chance to vote.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.2 Except where otherwise noted, voting periods must last for a
|
||
|
minimum of seven days, or until all USBIC members have voted. At
|
||
|
the conclusion of the voting period the vote taker must post the
|
||
|
vote tally and the E-mail addresses and names of the voters,
|
||
|
indicating whether they voted yes or no, to all the members of
|
||
|
USBIC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.3 Except where otherwise noted, a simple majority vote is needed
|
||
|
to pass an issue.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.4 Once a matter has been decided by a vote, all members shall
|
||
|
accept that decision, and co-operate in any manner necessary to
|
||
|
implement any consequences of that decision, regardless of their
|
||
|
own feelings or vote.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.4.1 Because they do not partake in the vote, this does not mean
|
||
|
that they are not bound by the decision. Ample time will be
|
||
|
given for them to comply. "Ample Time" will be decided at
|
||
|
vote-taking time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.5 An USBIC member may indicate that they do not wish to partake in
|
||
|
USBIC discussions or voting for a specified period by notifying
|
||
|
the other members of USBIC, for instance if they are going on
|
||
|
vacation and do not wish to be disturbed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. There will be a MODERATED mailing list for USBIC members where all
|
||
|
official USBIC related discussion will go.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.1 The moderator of the USBIC mailing list will be elected by the
|
||
|
members of USBIC. A new moderator may be appointed at any time by a
|
||
|
vote of USBIC members.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.2 Any rejected articles by the moderator will be returned to the
|
||
|
sender with a short explanation why it was rejected.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. There will be an active routing plan to provide an optimal structure
|
||
|
for all servers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.1 This plan will provide adequate backup links that will provide for
|
||
|
major network failures.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.2 Procedures for where and when dynamic routing changes should be
|
||
|
made will also be mentioned in the above plan.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.3 New plans can be implemented once a new plan is proposed, voted on,
|
||
|
and accepted by the USBIC members.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.4 Information shall be made publically available together with the
|
||
|
other information detailed above.
|
||
|
|
||
|
##### RULES FOR IRC SERVER ADMINISTRATORS AND OPERATORS #####
|
||
|
|
||
|
(This section of the USBIC rules is based on the OzBIC rules written by
|
||
|
Darren Reed (avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au) and Elizabeth M. Reid
|
||
|
(emr@ee.mu.oz.au))
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. All server administrators must have an account on the machine which is
|
||
|
running the IRC server software.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1 Server administrators must have written (email) system
|
||
|
administrator approval to run the irc server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Servers must provide (via the A: line) valid email addresses for
|
||
|
each server administrator who is responsible for that server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.1 Email addresses for the server administrator must be on a local
|
||
|
machine, and must not forward off-site. Exceptions will be made
|
||
|
where the USBIC body has granted permission for non-local email
|
||
|
addresses.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.2 Email addresses listed which are aliases should give a list of the
|
||
|
recipients whenever the mail server (ie sendmail) is presented with
|
||
|
a valid EXPN command (from the SMTP protocol).
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The only people who are allowed access to the server's configuration file
|
||
|
are those who are recognised as the server administrators as defined
|
||
|
above.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. Modified source shall not be used unless it meets the following criteria:
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.1 It is not a test or experimental server. Test and/or experimental
|
||
|
servers have no place on the main net until they are no longer
|
||
|
tests and/or experiments.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.2 The modifications are made publicly available, preferably via
|
||
|
anonymous ftp. A copy of this must also be sent to the
|
||
|
maintainer of the IRC server source code for review.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.2.1 The place of availability must be easily reachable by all members of
|
||
|
the internet (ie firewalled public anonymous ftp sites are not
|
||
|
acceptable).
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.3 The server while running must clearly indicate by way of the
|
||
|
patchlevel the modifications/origins of the modifications.
|
||
|
Failure to do this contravenes the GNU Public License under which
|
||
|
the IRC server is registered.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.4 If any server administrator is aware of a server running code
|
||
|
which does not conform to the above rules he or she is required
|
||
|
to inform all members of USBIC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. Additional IRC operators may be appointed at the discretion of the
|
||
|
server administrator(s) under the following conditions:
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.1 Operators must be sent a copy of the USBIC rules, and must
|
||
|
indicate their compliance with them before being given an O-line.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.2 Server administrators must notify the members of USBIC of any new
|
||
|
operators on their servers, and must circulate copies of that new
|
||
|
operator's letter of agreement to abide by USBIC rules.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.2.1 The O-line for the operator may not be activated until a
|
||
|
one-week period from when the USBIC members were notified has
|
||
|
passed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.3 An operator's O-line must be removed by the relevant server
|
||
|
administrator(s) if a majority vote of the USBIC membership calls
|
||
|
for it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.4 Server operators on a server must all connect from nearby hosts.
|
||
|
(no out-of-region hosts).
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.4.1 It is acceptable for server administrators to have operator
|
||
|
status on their up and down links as long as all parties
|
||
|
involved are registered members of USBIC. This access should
|
||
|
not be treated as a condition for the server to be accepted nor
|
||
|
should it be considered as mandatory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.4.2 If there is a good reason for the existence of a non-local
|
||
|
operator on a server, the administrator(s) of that server may
|
||
|
petition the other members of USBIC for permission, by calling
|
||
|
for a vote on the matter. The distance from the out-of-region
|
||
|
operator to the server should be minimal. Outside of the
|
||
|
country is unacceptable.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. All server administrators are required to keep their server
|
||
|
configuration files up to date. In this context, `up to date' means
|
||
|
no longer than 24 hours after the administrator becomes aware of the
|
||
|
need to change the configuration file, and no longer than one week
|
||
|
in any case. This includes (but is not limited to) the following:
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.1 Ensuring they are running *the* most recent server version. A two
|
||
|
week grace period will be given for servers to upgrade to the most
|
||
|
stable latest server version. Old versions will not be tolerated.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.1.1 Hub servers must upgrade to the most recent patch level
|
||
|
within 24 hours.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.2 Ensuring that C/N lines for servers which no longer run are not left
|
||
|
in an `active' state.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.3 Ensuring that all C/N lines for servers have passwords;
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.4 Ensuring that O-lines are set up in such a way as to only allow
|
||
|
connections that conform to previously mentioned restrictions;
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.5 (for non-hub servers) With the appropriate use of I-lines, restrict
|
||
|
access to your server to that server's immediate domain plus whatever
|
||
|
currently used sites are closest. These I-lines will be revised as
|
||
|
the need arises.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.6 (for hub servers) ensuring that all links for leaf servers shall be
|
||
|
"L: lined" (leaf-only) so to prevent leaf servers from routing
|
||
|
traffic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
7. Administrators who remove their server from operation for some
|
||
|
period of time are requested to inform people in advance by at
|
||
|
least 24 hours (preferably more) so that appropriate measures can
|
||
|
be taken to ensure there is minimum risk to the IRC network.
|
||
|
Notification should be via the (to be formed) usbic mailing list,
|
||
|
operlist, and alt.irc (for the users). It is suggested that the
|
||
|
administrator in question put the information in their /MOTD.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8. Servers or server administrators found to be in breach of any of
|
||
|
the above rules should be asked to rectify the problem.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8.1 If any breaches of the above rules are not rectified within three
|
||
|
days (four days if over a weekend) after the administrator has
|
||
|
been asked to rectify them, the members of USBIC should be
|
||
|
informed of the transgression.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8.2 Once the USBIC membership has been notified of the breach, if a
|
||
|
server administrator found to be in breach of any of the above
|
||
|
rules refuses to rectify the situation and cannot provide any
|
||
|
any reasons which USBIC members find valid for the breach, the
|
||
|
administrators of servers which link to the offending server
|
||
|
should co-operate with US, and regional routing coordinators
|
||
|
to ensure that all links for the offending server are commented
|
||
|
out, and servers which need them have alternative links.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8.3 Links which have been commented out may be reinstated within 1
|
||
|
week if the offending operator rectifies the problem. If the
|
||
|
problem is not rectified within 1 week links to the offending
|
||
|
server should be removed entirely.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8.3.1 Server administrators who have had their links cut after being
|
||
|
found to have breached USBIC rules may apply to have their
|
||
|
links reinstated by following the USBIC Rules for the
|
||
|
Establishment of New Servers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9. Server administrators must not allow their server to be used for
|
||
|
the interception of or tampering with of any network traffic,
|
||
|
unless they have the appropriate legal permissions to do so.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.1 If such permissions do exist the administrator(s) of the server
|
||
|
being used to intercept or tamper with traffic must (unless
|
||
|
specifically prohibited from doing so by the appropriate legal
|
||
|
authorities) provide the administrators of all servers which link
|
||
|
to his or her server with a copy of the documents giving that
|
||
|
permission.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.1.1 Administrators who have been made aware of the existence of
|
||
|
any such permissions must treat that knowledge as
|
||
|
confidential.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.2 Any server operator who becomes aware of any use of an IRC
|
||
|
server to intercept or tamper with network traffic must take the
|
||
|
following actions:
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.2.1 inform the administrator(s) of the server involved of his or
|
||
|
her suspicions, and provide the administrator(s) with copies
|
||
|
of any evidence that has been found.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.2.2 inform the administrators of those servers which connect to
|
||
|
the suspect server of his or her suspicions, and provide the
|
||
|
administrators with copies of any evidence that has been
|
||
|
found.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3 Administrators of servers who are informed that a server for
|
||
|
which they have links is suspected of using that server to
|
||
|
intercept or tamper with network traffic should take the
|
||
|
following actions:
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3.1 If the administrator is aware of any relevant permissions
|
||
|
having been granted, the person who has brought their
|
||
|
suspicions to the knowledge of the administrator should be
|
||
|
told of this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3.2 If the administrator is not aware of any relevant permissions,
|
||
|
he or she should cooperate with any other servers which link
|
||
|
to the suspect server to ensure that all links for the
|
||
|
offending server are commented out, and that servers which
|
||
|
need them have alternative links, and should then inform all
|
||
|
other members of USBIC of the reason for the quarantine.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3.3 If, within 1 week of links for the suspect server being
|
||
|
commented out, the administrator(s) of the server are unable
|
||
|
to produce proof of any permissions allowing him or her to
|
||
|
intercept or tamper with network traffic, links for that
|
||
|
server should be permanently cut. Proof of permission includes:
|
||
|
a warrant or court order, a written request from the computing
|
||
|
center. Other justifications might be permitted. They will be
|
||
|
dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3.4 If there is more than one server administrator at the suspect
|
||
|
site, and it can be shown that only one knew about and was
|
||
|
responsible for the illegal interception of or tampering with
|
||
|
of network traffic, then the offending server administrator
|
||
|
should be removed from his or her position, the server should
|
||
|
be recompiled, and links to the server should be reinstated.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.3.5 A server administrator who has lost his or her links after
|
||
|
breaching rule 9 may not apply to have links reinstated,
|
||
|
however application may be made to establish a server at the
|
||
|
same site with different server administrator(s).
|
||
|
|
||
|
9.4 Administrators who, through the normal course of debugging or
|
||
|
maintaining the server, capture traffic not explicitly destined
|
||
|
for them will not be considered to be in breach of rule 9, but
|
||
|
must keep the contents of that traffic strictly confidential, and
|
||
|
destroy any information not directly related to their
|
||
|
administrative task.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
##### RULES FOR CO-ORDINATING SIMPLE DECISIONS, #####
|
||
|
##### AND AVOIDING UN-NECESSARY VOTING #####
|
||
|
|
||
|
(This section of the USBIC rules was based on the OzBIC Rules was
|
||
|
written by Daniel Carosone (danielce@ee.mu.oz.au))
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. This position is intended to simplify the process of implementing
|
||
|
common-sense decisions without needing to invoke the entire voting
|
||
|
mechanism of USBIC, as well as to provide a single person to handle
|
||
|
simple day-to-day matters with the minimum of fuss. Any decision
|
||
|
made by the primary co-ordinator of a domain may be questioned at
|
||
|
any time by an USBIC member, and if necessary challenged by a vote.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Each hostmasked domain shall, by whatever means chosen internally
|
||
|
by the members of that domain, appoint one person as the main
|
||
|
contact for that site. By default this will be the administrator
|
||
|
of the main server for that site, but may be any recognized USBIC
|
||
|
member from that site.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.1 Each site will be represented on a regional board. The regions will
|
||
|
be defined in the routing plan, and the number will be determined
|
||
|
later. The USBIC members of each region will then elect a person
|
||
|
to represent the best interests of that region to USBIC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.2 The primary routing co-ordinator for the US shall be appointed by
|
||
|
vote of the USBIC membership. He/She will work in conjunction with
|
||
|
the information provided by regional routing co-ordinators to
|
||
|
maintain and modify the routing plan as necessary.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.3 Someone may not be regional co-ordinator for more than one region.
|
||
|
However, a person may be a regional co-ordinator and a primary
|
||
|
co-ordinator if the vote favors it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.4 All routing co-ordinators may be removed from their position if the
|
||
|
region votes in favor of a new co-ordinator.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The main contact for each domain shall be the person to contact for
|
||
|
all routine administrative details pertaining to that domain.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. The main contact of each domain is responsible for organizing
|
||
|
and maintaining such things as routing within the domain, and
|
||
|
all external links to/from servers in that domain.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4.1 The main contact should consult with the regional co-ordinator
|
||
|
when making arrangements involving other servers in the region.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. The regional co-ordinator is empowered to direct and make decisions
|
||
|
about how various servers and networks should link together to form
|
||
|
the most sensible and efficient regional structure.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5.1 Except in cases where the changes will constitute a change in
|
||
|
the overall routing plan for the US. In which case, the primary
|
||
|
routing co-ordinator must be consulted.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. All changes in domain, regional, or national level routing will
|
||
|
be documented by the relevant co-ordinators.
|
||
|
|
||
|
##### RULES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW IRC SERVERS #####
|
||
|
|
||
|
(This section of the OzBIC rules is based on the European Board of IRC
|
||
|
Co-ordinators' (EBIC) "RULES FOR ESTABLISHING NEW IRC SERVERS IN
|
||
|
EUROPE". Modifications by Elizabeth M. Reid (emr@ee.mu.oz.au)).
|
||
|
In turn, it has been modified for USBIC by Helen Rose (hrose@eff.org).
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Establishment of a new server should be a local toplevel domain
|
||
|
(country) decision.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1 Any person wishing to establish a new server should send email to
|
||
|
the administrator(s) of the potential uplink server giving
|
||
|
reasons (eg. number of users at the proposed site) for the
|
||
|
request, together with other relevant details about themselves,
|
||
|
about the machine and network connectivity and so on.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.2 The administrator(s) of the potential uplink server must send
|
||
|
the candidate administrator a copy of the USBIC rules.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3 The potential uplink administrator(s) must also send email to the
|
||
|
system administrator at the candidate site, informing him or her of
|
||
|
the request for links for an IRC server, and asking for confirmation
|
||
|
of his or her permission to run the server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3.1 This should be done even if the candidate system administrator
|
||
|
claims to be the system administrator at the site in question.
|
||
|
If necessary, a phonecall should be used as a follow-up. Being
|
||
|
listed as the NIC contact for the site is sufficient proof.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.4 If the candidate agrees to abide by USBIC rules, and permission
|
||
|
from the system administrator at the proposed new site has been
|
||
|
given, the potential uplink administrator(s) must mail all other
|
||
|
members of USBIC, via the moderated USBIC mailing list, stating
|
||
|
the reasons why a new server should be established, and calling
|
||
|
for a vote on the matter. Copies of the candidate administrator's
|
||
|
agreement to abide by USBIC rules, and of the system
|
||
|
administrator's permission to run an IRC server, must also be
|
||
|
forwarded to the members of USBIC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.5 If the vote is successful, the primary routing co-ordinator will
|
||
|
classify the new server into a region, and the regional routing
|
||
|
co-ordinator will find the best place(s)to give links to the new
|
||
|
server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.5.1 If the vote is unsuccessful, no petitions for a new server
|
||
|
from that site will be allowed for three weeks. After which
|
||
|
the server may re apply for the establishment of a new server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. New servers must serve a probationary period, any condition of
|
||
|
which can be ended if a majority of USBIC members agree to it.
|
||
|
Probationary conditions are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.1 New servers should be leafed until their administrator(s) have
|
||
|
sufficient experience to handle their server responsibly. (This
|
||
|
avoids routing disasters).
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.2 A link for only ONE server should be given to the new server
|
||
|
site.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.3 At the end of two weeks the probationary period is automatically
|
||
|
ended. The server may now be fully implemented in any routing
|
||
|
decided upon by the regional routing co-ordinator.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.3.1 If during the probationary period, complaints are raised to the
|
||
|
new server, after two weeks a vote will be called on to decide
|
||
|
if the probationary period should be extended for another
|
||
|
two weeks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. If a server administrator wishes or needs to switch from running
|
||
|
the server on one machine at a particular site to another machine
|
||
|
at the same site, this does not constitute a new server, and does
|
||
|
not require a vote. Server administrators should arrange these
|
||
|
changes amongst themselves, and inform the USBIC members of the change.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. If administration of a current server changes, the server will
|
||
|
will have to undergo a new probationary period.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. Server administrators must ensure that if a domain hostmask link is
|
||
|
given, all servers of that domain can connect to the masked server.
|
||
|
(this should avoid disagreement between several hub administrators
|
||
|
in one domain).
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. Where there is more than 1 server running at an organization and due
|
||
|
to whatever circumstances they are not able to be connected to each
|
||
|
other a vote should be taken by USBIC members to decide if either
|
||
|
server is necessary.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6.1 Where there is more than one server running on hosts within the same
|
||
|
domain a host mask should be used whenever a server forms a connection
|
||
|
with an IRC server external to that organisation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
##### RULES FOR EFFECTING CHANGES TO THE USBIC RULES #####
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
(This section was written by Elizabeth M. Reid (emr@ee.mu.oz.au) and
|
||
|
is based on the rules for creating new Usenet newsgroups written by
|
||
|
Gene Spafford) Again, modified by hrose@eff.org
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Any USBIC member may propose a change to the USBIC rules by
|
||
|
informing all other members of the proposal.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Changes to USBIC rules may be effected as follows:
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.1 Proposed changes must be posted to all USBIC members, and a
|
||
|
discussion period of at least two weeks must pass before a vote
|
||
|
can be called.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.2 After a minimum of two weeks have passed since the call for
|
||
|
discussion, a call for votes may be issued. The voting period
|
||
|
must last for at least two weeks and the time at which voting
|
||
|
will close must be posted along with the call for votes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.3 At the end of the voting period the vote taker must post the vote
|
||
|
tally and the E-mail addresses and names of the voters,
|
||
|
indicating whether they voted yes or no, to all the members of
|
||
|
USBIC. The moderated USBIC list, mentioned above, will be used for
|
||
|
the purpose of tallying votes. The moderator of the USBIC mailing
|
||
|
list will do the tallying and announce the results in a timely
|
||
|
fashion.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.4 If there are any corrections to be made to the vote tally they
|
||
|
must be made within 1 week of it being posted. Any corrections
|
||
|
must be taken to account when calculating the final vote tally.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2.5 If, after corrections, there is a 2/3 (two thirds) majority in
|
||
|
favour of the change to the USBIC rules, the person who called
|
||
|
the vote may change the USBIC rules, and distribute the new set
|
||
|
of rules to all members of USBIC, to alt.irc, and to all the FTP
|
||
|
sites which carry the rules.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Rules cannot be applied retroactively. No member can be held to
|
||
|
task for rules which did not exist at the time of any behaviour
|
||
|
which is later ruled against.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. Rules will be unilateral. All servers must comply with new rules
|
||
|
which have been voted on, and passed. If server do not comply with
|
||
|
the rules, proper procedures for servers breaking USBIC policies
|
||
|
will be followed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
OBVIOUS CHANGES FROM DRAFT #1:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Voting Procedures for adoption of USBIC
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Voting will be limited to the servers on the "list of servers" posted
|
||
|
to alt.irc and to the ftp site h.ece.uiuc.edu:/irc/servers.930301
|
||
|
2. Each server gets one vote. Servers at a site run by the same admin
|
||
|
and/or servers that link together get one vote. (e.g. csa.bu.edu and
|
||
|
csd.bu.edu are run by the same admin) Servers behind a hostmask get one
|
||
|
vote.
|
||
|
3. Each *admin* gets one vote. Even if the admin controls multiple
|
||
|
servers at multiple sites.
|
||
|
4. Only USBIC members can vote.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Organization of USBIC
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. USBIC will have a council of members. This allows busy administrators
|
||
|
not to have to be part of day-to-day decisions, yet allows all areas of
|
||
|
the country to have a say.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1 The council will be made up of regional co-ordinators. The regions
|
||
|
they represent will be determined along with the accepted routing
|
||
|
plan.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1.1 Each region shall elect its own representative to the USBIC
|
||
|
council. They shall form their own voting procedure at the local
|
||
|
level.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1.2 Each region will have veto power over the USBIC council on
|
||
|
whether a new server in their region should be added or not.
|
||
|
The idea is that only the local people know the impact of a
|
||
|
local server or not. But the local people must have 80% approval
|
||
|
of the /admins of the region for a veto.
|