109 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
109 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
|
From gmw1@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu Wed Mar 15 18:30:05 1989
|
|||
|
From: gmw1@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Gabe M Wiener)
|
|||
|
Subject: Writing a research paper
|
|||
|
Keywords: chuckle
|
|||
|
Date: 16 Mar 89 00:30:05 GMT
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(This is one of those xeroxes you keep seeing in your desk drawer. No idea
|
|||
|
where it originated.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
GLOSSARY FOR RESEARCH PAPERS: Strictly Speaking
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
THEY WRITE THEY MEAN
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It has long been known that... I haven't bothered to look up
|
|||
|
the original reference
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
...of great theoretical and practical ...interesting to me
|
|||
|
importance
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While it has not been possible to The experiments didn't work
|
|||
|
provide definite answers to these out, but I figured I could at
|
|||
|
questions. least get a publication out
|
|||
|
of it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The W-Pb system was chosen as The fellow in the next lab had
|
|||
|
especially suitable to show the some already made up
|
|||
|
predicted behavior...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
High purity... Composition unknown except
|
|||
|
Very high purity... for the exaggerated claims of
|
|||
|
Extremely high purity... the supplier
|
|||
|
Super-purity...
|
|||
|
Spectroscopically pure...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A fiducial reference line... A scratch
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Three of the samples were The results of the others
|
|||
|
chosen for detailed study... didn't make sense and were
|
|||
|
ignored..
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
...handled with extreme care during ...not dropped on the floor
|
|||
|
the experiments
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Typical results are shown... The best results are shown...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Although some detail has been lost It is impossible to tell from
|
|||
|
in reproduction, it is clear from the the micrograph
|
|||
|
original micrograph that...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Presumably at longer times... I didn't take the time to find
|
|||
|
out
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The agreement with the predicted fair
|
|||
|
curve is excellent
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
good poor
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
satisfactory doubtful
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fair imaginary
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
...as good as could be expected non-existent
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
These results will be reported at I might get around to this
|
|||
|
a later date sometime
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The most reliable values are those He was a student of mine
|
|||
|
of Jones
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is suggested that...
|
|||
|
It is believed that... I think...
|
|||
|
It may be that...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is generally believed that.... I have such a good objection
|
|||
|
to this answer that I shall
|
|||
|
now raise it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is clear that much additional I don't understand it
|
|||
|
work will be required before a
|
|||
|
complete understanding...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Unfortunately, a quantitative theory Neither does anybody else
|
|||
|
to account for these effects has not
|
|||
|
been formulated
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Correct within an order of magnitude Wrong
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is to be hoped that this work This paper isn't very good but
|
|||
|
will stimulate further work in the field neither are any of the others
|
|||
|
on this miserable subject
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thanks are due to Joe Glotz for Glotz did the work and Doe
|
|||
|
assistance with the experiments and explained what it meant.
|
|||
|
to John Doe for valuable discussions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------
|
|||
|
Gabe Wiener Columbia University
|
|||
|
--
|
|||
|
Edited by Brad Templeton. MAIL, yes MAIL your jokes to funny@looking.UUCP
|
|||
|
Attribute the joke's source if at all possible. I will reply, mailers willing.
|
|||
|
I reply to all submissions, but about 30% of the replies bounce.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|