78 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
78 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
From werner Wed Oct 26 14:06:34 1988
|
|||
|
Flags: 000000000001
|
|||
|
From: roller@hocpa.UUCP
|
|||
|
Subject: The Future of the English Language
|
|||
|
Keywords: smirk
|
|||
|
Date: 26 Oct 88 03:30:04 GMT
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'm sorry to report that I don't know who wrote the following
|
|||
|
discussion of the future of English. It given to me nearly ten years
|
|||
|
ago when I was a professor at Southern Methodist University.
|
|||
|
Although I had many excellent students at SMU, there is no denying
|
|||
|
that the style of this document resembles that of some term papers I
|
|||
|
received.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Paul Michaelis AT&T Bell Labs att!hocpa!roller
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This sentence demonstrates alot of the to frequent
|
|||
|
errors that occur in my freshman composition classes, its
|
|||
|
not just there willingness to gleefully split an infinitive
|
|||
|
or end a sentence with a preposition which are the problems
|
|||
|
kindly boarding school masters used to be concerned with.
|
|||
|
Its true my students arent the good mannered middle class
|
|||
|
bunch who I went to school with, there more often cops or
|
|||
|
shoesalesmens or garbagemens (pardon me, sanitationmens)
|
|||
|
sons and daughters, and yet there a sharp group, wary,
|
|||
|
skeptical, bright.
|
|||
|
So when I knock myself out day after day class after
|
|||
|
class explaining the genitive case in english, the proper
|
|||
|
position of commas, the runon sentence, the distinction
|
|||
|
between the three theres and still these mistakes appear
|
|||
|
even in the work of the best of them I wonder.
|
|||
|
I wonder if just maybe they know something I dont about
|
|||
|
the english language. Something intuitive about its history
|
|||
|
and something instinctive about its future. After all, its
|
|||
|
been the movement of the language to progress toward
|
|||
|
simplicity. The case structure, with its confusing endings,
|
|||
|
was an early victim. Why say "On his dagum hierde Gregorius
|
|||
|
goda lara" when with a little reliance on word order and
|
|||
|
common sense you can more simply say "In his time Gregorys
|
|||
|
heard good lectures"?
|
|||
|
Besides the nagging whom the last vestige of the case
|
|||
|
structure in english is the genitives use of the apostrophe.
|
|||
|
But surely common sense and word order indicate the genetive
|
|||
|
usage and my students perception is correct in eliminating
|
|||
|
the troublesome superscript.
|
|||
|
Theres wisdom in doing away with punctuation that
|
|||
|
doesnt contribute to clarity and when my classes
|
|||
|
monolithically dispose of pointless spelling distinctions
|
|||
|
where the sense is obvious there judgment may be sound.
|
|||
|
Then again, alot of my colleagues lose sleep over the
|
|||
|
way some students slam two words or letters into one but
|
|||
|
metathesis or the changing of the position of sounds or
|
|||
|
letters is a venerable tradition, or else a newt might still
|
|||
|
be an ewt.
|
|||
|
Words in english usually explain themselves by position
|
|||
|
and context, though of course there exceptions to this rule
|
|||
|
which my students in there foresight have not anticipated
|
|||
|
but give them awhile and they will.
|
|||
|
I cant go into detail about every grammatical
|
|||
|
innovation made by my students, theres alot to recommend
|
|||
|
them though and if your an editor, the author of an english
|
|||
|
grammar or the perpetrator of a work on footnote logic and
|
|||
|
you can read this you should pay attention to my class
|
|||
|
because one day they might take over and one day you might
|
|||
|
wake up. And discover your fired.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--
|
|||
|
.
|
|||
|
If you MUST reply to a rejection, include a description of your joke
|
|||
|
because there is 0 chance I will remember which one it was.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|