31 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
New York, __ -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Software
|
||
|
(PETS) announced today that seven more software companies have
|
||
|
been added to the group's "watch list" of companies that regularly
|
||
|
practice software testing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"There is no need for software to be mistreated in this way so that
|
||
|
companies like these can market new products," said Ken Granola,
|
||
|
spokesperson for PETS. "Alternative methods of testing these
|
||
|
products are available."
|
||
|
|
||
|
According to PETS, these companies force software to undergo
|
||
|
lengthy and arduous tests, often without rest, for hours or
|
||
|
days at a time. Employees are assigned to "break" the software
|
||
|
by any means necessary, and inside sources report that they
|
||
|
often joke about "torturing' the software.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"It's no joke," said Granola. "Innocent programs, from the day they
|
||
|
are compiled, are cooped up in tiny rooms and 'crashed' for hours on
|
||
|
end. They spend their whole lives on dirty, ill-maintained
|
||
|
computers, and are unceremoniously deleted when they're not needed
|
||
|
anymore."
|
||
|
|
||
|
Granola said the software is kept in unsanitary conditions and is
|
||
|
infested with bugs.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We know alternatives to this horror exist," He said, citing
|
||
|
industry giant Microsoft Corporation as a company that has become
|
||
|
extremely successful without resorting to software testing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-From Somewhere on the Internet
|