312 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
312 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
|
##############################################################################
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Boston SCA Report - Weld Pond
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contents
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SCA Additional Thoughts on SCA Reception by John Sangster
|
|||
|
Eavesdropping On Subcarrier Transmissions by Bob Parnass
|
|||
|
Boston Area SCA Test by Weld Pond
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
##############################################################################
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SCA Additional Thoughts on SCA Reception:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As I recall, the setup described by Bob Parnass (I think that was who it
|
|||
|
was) was to hook a VLF receiver to the output of an ordinary FM receiver
|
|||
|
to pick up SCCA (sic - I always call it that, Sports Car Club of
|
|||
|
America, when it should really be SCA - Subsidiary Communications
|
|||
|
Authorization or something!) transmissions multiplexed on ordinary FM
|
|||
|
broadcasts.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To understand what is going on, you need to know what the FM station
|
|||
|
actually transmits.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Let's do it in "top down" fashion. All you computer jocks out there
|
|||
|
should relate nicely to that.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
First of all, the FM station has a "composite audio" input - this is
|
|||
|
just the input on which SOMETHING (consider it a stub subroutine to
|
|||
|
written later) is fed in to the modulator.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
From the FM modulator's point of view, what you put on this input is
|
|||
|
just the MODULATING SIGNAL which you want to Frequency Modulate (FM) the
|
|||
|
station's carrier. Intuitively, you can think of the station as putting
|
|||
|
out a "pure" carrier at frequency F when this modulating signal is zero.
|
|||
|
When it is NONZERO, however, the instantaneous frequency of the
|
|||
|
transmitter is changed. Say the modulating signal value, in volts, or
|
|||
|
whatever, is M. Then the transmitter output frequency is set to F + K*M
|
|||
|
where K is a sensitivity constant which is unimportant except that
|
|||
|
whatever maximum value of M is applied to the FM modulator input should
|
|||
|
result in a maximum "frequency deviation" K*M which is just about the
|
|||
|
maximum that the FCC allows.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If this station were a plain old-fashioned monaural FM station, all it
|
|||
|
would have to do is feed in the audio signal -- voice, music or funny
|
|||
|
sound effects -- which you want the listeners out there in Radio-Land
|
|||
|
to hear.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The signal would modulate the carrier, be amplified, fed to the antenna
|
|||
|
and radiated. It would come swooping down into your ordinary, Monaural
|
|||
|
FM receiver. The receiver would say, hmm... The frequency is F + K*M
|
|||
|
I therefore have to subtract F and divide by K to give my loyal owner
|
|||
|
the instantaneous value of the signal waveform, which is M. Voila! Out
|
|||
|
of the FM demodulator comes M in livid high fidelity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(I don't think the following information is needed for present purposes,
|
|||
|
but I include it so somebody won't say I am oversimplifying things!!
|
|||
|
Now, even in simple monaural FM there is one trick that we haven't
|
|||
|
mentioned. This is called pre-emphasis and de-emphasis. Very early in
|
|||
|
the game, it was noticed that in FM systems if you fed in no modulation
|
|||
|
at all and listened to the receiver's reconstructed value of M (after it
|
|||
|
did the arithmetic noted above), there was a NOISE output from the
|
|||
|
receiver, even at fairly strong signal levels. The noise was
|
|||
|
particularly noticeable because its amplitude increased with frequency.
|
|||
|
Thus a quite noticeable high-frequency hiss was present on even fairly
|
|||
|
good signals. Somebody then had the bright idea that they should
|
|||
|
effectively "turn down the treble control" at the receiver. A fixed
|
|||
|
frequency compensating network called a "de-emphasis" network was
|
|||
|
designed and standardized to do that. But then the music had its highs
|
|||
|
"de-emphasized", so an "inverse" network called a pre-emphasis network
|
|||
|
was added at the transmitter.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Next, along came stereo. In order to avoid the wrath of all the owners
|
|||
|
of monaural FM sets, the FCC in its wisdom decreed that a "compatible"
|
|||
|
system would be necessary before they would approve FM stereo. The
|
|||
|
engineers quickly noted that the A+B signal from two microphones gives a
|
|||
|
passable monaural signal (especially if "one-point" miking is used).
|
|||
|
Now the problem was how to get A and B out of A+B. Well, as your high
|
|||
|
school algebra teacher probably taught you, (A+B)+(A-B)=A and
|
|||
|
(A+B)-(A-B)=B. So all they had to do is send (A-B) in some clever way
|
|||
|
and the receiver could reconstruct A and B by "matrixing". The method
|
|||
|
adopted was to "multiplex" this (A-B) signal onto the main carrier by
|
|||
|
using it to modulate a SUBcarrier located at 38 KHz. Double-Sideband
|
|||
|
Suppressed Carrier (DSBSC) modulation was chosen. This gave a "lower
|
|||
|
sideband" extending downward from 38KHz (less 20Hz or so) to 23KHz
|
|||
|
(because the highs were cut off at 15 KHz.) A "pilot carrier" was put
|
|||
|
at 19 KHz which allows the receiver to recover the precise frequency
|
|||
|
phase of the 38 KHz carrier so that recovery of the (A-B) signal could
|
|||
|
proceed. In fact it turns out that this carrier can be used in an even
|
|||
|
more clever way to recover A and B signals directly from the "composite"
|
|||
|
signal ( A+B plus pilot carrier plus A-B ).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note that all the new junk -- pilot at 19KHz and A-B from 23 to 38 K
|
|||
|
-- are so high in frequency that most people wouldn't hear them, and
|
|||
|
most older monaural FM sets and loudspeakers won't reproduce them
|
|||
|
audibly anyway.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, as if this wasn't bad enough, then along came the SCCA (I warned
|
|||
|
you about my warped sense of humor) and asked for authorization to put
|
|||
|
MUZAK on the air. The obvious thing to do was to put on yet another
|
|||
|
subcarrier, this time at a frequency far enough above the audio so that
|
|||
|
it wouldn't interfere with stereo broadcasting. 67 KHz was chosen as
|
|||
|
the magic frequency. But this time, FM modulation was chosen.
|
|||
|
Remember, all of this stuff is being stacked up in frequency above the
|
|||
|
normal monaural FM broadcast audio in such a way that a normal FM
|
|||
|
receiver won't be affected (much) by it. So before we even go into
|
|||
|
"composite audio" input of our simple FM transmitter, we have a VERY
|
|||
|
"composite" signal indeed. One might diagram it like this:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
weak pilot suppressed just a
|
|||
|
carrier carrier boundary FM
|
|||
|
/ / / sideband
|
|||
|
/ / / sub /
|
|||
|
/ / / car. /
|
|||
|
| | | | | /
|
|||
|
| Normal FM | (A-B) Lower | (A-B) Upper | /||||||||\
|
|||
|
| audio (A+B) | Sideband | Sideband | /||||S|C|A|||||\
|
|||
|
| | | | /|||||S|i|g|n|a|l|||||\
|
|||
|
DC 19KHz 38KHz 53KHz 67KHz
|
|||
|
--monaural
|
|||
|
signal----
|
|||
|
--------stereo composite signal-----------
|
|||
|
-------------full composite (stereo + SCA) signal-------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now to the main point. The FM transmitter takes this composite audio
|
|||
|
signal as input and FM MODULATES its carrier with it. When this is
|
|||
|
received by an FM receiver, what comes out of the discriminator is the
|
|||
|
composite signal. In a normal monaural FM receiver, this is fed to the
|
|||
|
volume control and thence to the audio amplifier stages, where
|
|||
|
"de-emphasis" is applied as noted above, and finally out to the speakers
|
|||
|
or headphones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If it doesn't have FM demodulation available at this frequency, then
|
|||
|
can still use a trick called "slope detection". Tune it above 67 KHz so
|
|||
|
that the 67 KHz carrier falls on the lower slope of the IF selectivity
|
|||
|
curve. I.e. the signal has fallen off about halfway from its peak value
|
|||
|
on the meter. Select AM demodulation, and then tune for the best sound.
|
|||
|
You should get acceptable recovery of the audio. If there is a
|
|||
|
bandwidth switch, experiment with it. Probably the widest bandwidth
|
|||
|
available will work best.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you don't have a suitable VLF receiver covering 67 KHz, the simple
|
|||
|
trick with the Phase-Locked Loop device will work just fine. After
|
|||
|
the monaural FM receiver has done most of the work of picking up the
|
|||
|
weak signal at VHF (88 to 108 MHz) and amplifying it and FM demodulating
|
|||
|
it so you have the baseband composite signal available to fool around
|
|||
|
with. What is going on here is that the PLL locks to the 67 KHz signal
|
|||
|
but since that is being FM modulated, it has to work a bit to stay
|
|||
|
locked. The Voltage-Controlled Oscillator has to be pushed above or
|
|||
|
below 67 KHz, its natural frequency, by applying a control voltage to
|
|||
|
the VCO input. All of this is done "automatically" by the design of
|
|||
|
phase-locking circuitry, but YOU can benefit by all this work it is
|
|||
|
doing: the control voltage is precisely a measurement of the
|
|||
|
instantaneous modulation value, M, that YOU want to hear! So you pick
|
|||
|
it off, amplify it, and listen to MUZAK (yuk) to your heart's content.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
From the above rather long-winded description, you can see that the
|
|||
|
is a lot of other junk floating around on the composite signal, namely
|
|||
|
all the stereo stuff below 53 KHz. To make the SCA demodulator work
|
|||
|
and be free of interference from the main channel, it would be well
|
|||
|
put a little selectivity ahead of the SCA demodulation if you are using
|
|||
|
the PLL trick. I haven't experimented with this, but I would think a
|
|||
|
simple high-pass filter to attenuate everything below 53 KHz would do
|
|||
|
fairly well. Of course with the VLF receiver you have all kinds of
|
|||
|
selectivity, so there should be no problem.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I hope this helps you understand what is going on with SCA. If you
|
|||
|
followed all the details, it should be clear that there is no black
|
|||
|
magic going on, but that once the composite signal has been received, a
|
|||
|
VLF FM receiver (a rather rare beastie) is logically what is needed
|
|||
|
recover the SCA signal. That's why it happens to be possible to string
|
|||
|
together such a seemingly unlikely pair of receivers and get SCA
|
|||
|
broadcasts.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-John Sangster, W3IK
|
|||
|
jhs at MITRE-Bedford, MA
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
##############################################################################
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Subject: update: listening to SCA (subcarrier) transmissions
|
|||
|
From: parnass@ihu1h.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S)
|
|||
|
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
|
|||
|
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio,net.audio
|
|||
|
Date: 25 Feb 85 17:31:34 GMT
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EAVESDROPPING ON SUBCARRIER TRANSMISSIONS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A few weeks ago, I posed a question about listening to
|
|||
|
SCA transmissions on the FM commercial broadcast band.
|
|||
|
An article in Monitoring_Times claimed that connecting
|
|||
|
a vlf receiver to an FM broadcast receiver would permit
|
|||
|
SCA detection.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Necessity being the mother of invention, a way was
|
|||
|
found to confuse the ICOM R71A into tuning below 100
|
|||
|
kHz1, and after receiving substantial inspiration from
|
|||
|
Will Martin, Phil Karn, and others I now can report
|
|||
|
success!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With the R71A in the FM mode, tuned to 67 kHz, I con-
|
|||
|
nected the ICOM's vlf antenna input through a 0.1 ufd
|
|||
|
capacitor2 to the earphone jack of a $16 General Elec-
|
|||
|
tric AM/FM portable radio, and can now listen in on the
|
|||
|
world of SCA!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the first few minutes of tuning around, I've heard
|
|||
|
the Physicians' Network, Muzak, commodity reports, and
|
|||
|
several data transmissions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I built a simple SCA interface, consisting of a capaci-
|
|||
|
tor and resistor, into a plastic film canister.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
+-----------------------+
|
|||
|
| AM/FM radio |
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| earphone jack |
|
|||
|
| (ring) (tip) |
|
|||
|
+-----------------------+
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
+--/|/|/|/--+
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| 100 ohm |
|
|||
|
| 1 watt |
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| -----
|
|||
|
| ----- 0.1 ufd
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
+-----------------------+
|
|||
|
| (gnd) |
|
|||
|
| antenna jack |
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| ICOM R71A |
|
|||
|
+-----------------------+
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Most activity is heard with AM/FM radio tuned to the FM
|
|||
|
broadcast band, and the R71A set to 67 kHz FM. Aside
|
|||
|
from the Muzak, commodity reporting, and the Physici-
|
|||
|
ans' Network, I also heard an announcer reading from
|
|||
|
Popular_Communications on CRIS, the Chicago Radioland
|
|||
|
Information Service. This service carries programming
|
|||
|
of interest to the handicapped.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With the AM/FM radio tuned to the AM broadcast band,
|
|||
|
and the R71A set to 60 kHz AM, I can hear what seems to
|
|||
|
be stereo subcarriers on AM broadcast stations claiming
|
|||
|
to transmit in AM stereo.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
__________
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Parnass, Bob, "Trick the ICOM R71A below 100 kHz", to be
|
|||
|
published in Monitoring_Times.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. The capacitor is needed with the GE radio I used to
|
|||
|
block DC.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
===============================================================
|
|||
|
Bob Parnass, Bell Telephone Laboratories - ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
##############################################################################
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Boston Area SCA Test
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I have set up a crude SCA listening post. The earphone output of a Sony
|
|||
|
ICF-2010 AM/FM/SW radio is fed into the LW antenna input of an Icom IC-720A
|
|||
|
transceiver. It was very surprizing that the Icom tuned way down to 3 kHz,
|
|||
|
well below the required 67 kHz. The specs said it only would tune as low as
|
|||
|
100 kHz.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I tuned the Icom to 65 kHz and put it into AM mode. The filter, in AM mode,
|
|||
|
is 3 kHz wide so I wasn't expecting high fidelity. A 14 kHz filter would
|
|||
|
be perfect. The Sony was set to 102.5 MHz.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I first tried the tape output of the Sony. That didn't work at all. The tape
|
|||
|
output must have a low pass filter on it to eliminate the 19 kHz pilot. I
|
|||
|
next tried the earphone output. I got some noise out of the Icom. It seemed
|
|||
|
to be working. No earphone has a frequency response as high as 19kHz so
|
|||
|
they didn't bother with a filter on the earphone output.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After fiddling with the Icom tuning a bit and adjusting the volume controls
|
|||
|
on both radios, I definitely heard, you guessed it, MUZAK. The sound quality
|
|||
|
was pretty poor. The Icom doesn't have an FM mode so I used "slope detection."
|
|||
|
This is done by using the AM mode and tuning a bit off frequency. Another
|
|||
|
problem was the lack of a high pass filter to get rid of all the primary
|
|||
|
stereo signal. I could definitely decipher the words someone was saying or
|
|||
|
the song that was playing though.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are 3 standard subcarrier frequencies in use: 57 kHz, 67 kHz and 92 Khz.
|
|||
|
I tried all these plus some things in between and found these below from a
|
|||
|
location near Boston, MA.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
57 kHz 67 kHz 92 kHz
|
|||
|
88.9 Data Reading for the blind
|
|||
|
90.9 Chinese
|
|||
|
95.3 Spanish
|
|||
|
96.9 Data
|
|||
|
98.5 Data
|
|||
|
100.7 Data (really at 80? kHz)
|
|||
|
102.5 Muzak Easy Listening
|
|||
|
103.3 Data
|
|||
|
105.7 French
|
|||
|
107.9 Data
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Weld Pond
|
|||
|
|