186 lines
7.5 KiB
Plaintext
186 lines
7.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
The modern view of time
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Introduction
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the late 19th century, there were two theories of light.
|
|||
|
The first, held by Isaac Newton, among others, was that
|
|||
|
light was composed of tiny luminous "corpuscles", and that
|
|||
|
different colours were corpuscles of different masses. The
|
|||
|
second, held by Christiaan Huyghens, among others, was that
|
|||
|
light was a wave phenomenon, and that different colours were
|
|||
|
different frequencies. Both theories were supported by a
|
|||
|
large body of evidence, but both of them had trouble
|
|||
|
explaining some phenomena. However, the wave theory was more
|
|||
|
successful at explaining most phenomena, and by the end of
|
|||
|
the 19th century had won the support of most physicists.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. The Michelson-Morely Experiment
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By 1887, the wave theory of light was more or less accepted
|
|||
|
by everyone, despite the problem of how light propogates in
|
|||
|
vacuum (how can a WAVE exist without a medium in which to
|
|||
|
propogate?). An explanation was proposed, namely that a
|
|||
|
vacuum wasn't a true vacuum, but contained a substance with
|
|||
|
very strange properties, called Ether (don't confuse with
|
|||
|
the chemical).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Two American physicists, Michelson and Morely, attempted to
|
|||
|
detect the medium in which the light waves were propogating.
|
|||
|
They reasoned as follows:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Ether is (presumably) stationary, and the Earth is
|
|||
|
moving relative to it. If so, a beam of light trasmitted
|
|||
|
back and forth along the direction of the Earth's motion
|
|||
|
should take longer to cover the same distance than a beam
|
|||
|
transmitted across the direction of the Earth's motion (For
|
|||
|
proof, see apppendix A). All we have to do is compare the
|
|||
|
time it takes two light beams to go along/across the Earth's
|
|||
|
orbit.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
They set up the experiment, but could not detect ANY
|
|||
|
difference in the transit times. Subsequent experiments
|
|||
|
confirmed their results. This, of course, threatened to
|
|||
|
shake physics to its foundations.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. The Lorentz-Fitzgerald contractions
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In order to keep the foundations of physics from toppling,
|
|||
|
Lorentz and Fitzgerald proposed that the clocks on all
|
|||
|
moving particles slow down when measured by a outside
|
|||
|
observer. They also suggested a similar contraction for
|
|||
|
masses and distances in the direction of movement, to keep
|
|||
|
things consistent.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
v 0.5
|
|||
|
t' = (1 - ---) t time
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
c
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
v 0.5
|
|||
|
x' = (1 - ---) x
|
|||
|
2 distance
|
|||
|
c
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
m
|
|||
|
______________
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
v -0.5
|
|||
|
m' = (1 - ---) mass
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
c
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
These were "ad-hoc" corrections, and had no theoretical
|
|||
|
basis at the time, but they "saved the day".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4. The Theory of Relativity
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In 1905, a 26 year old physicist, Albert Einstein publish
|
|||
|
his special theory of relativity, which put the
|
|||
|
Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformations on a sound theoretical
|
|||
|
ground. Einstein made only one assumption - that the speed
|
|||
|
of light is measured as being exactly the same by all
|
|||
|
observers. This enabled him to explain the Michelson-Morely
|
|||
|
experiment, confirm the Lorentz-Fiztgerald contraction
|
|||
|
formulae, and also integrate electromagnetic theory and
|
|||
|
mechanics. It also derived the formula that is usually all
|
|||
|
most people know of physics:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
E = mc
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This theory set the upper speed limit at the speed of light.
|
|||
|
No attempts to break this speed have succeeded as of now.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The special theory was incomplete, in that it did not take
|
|||
|
into account the effects of gravity. In 1915, Einstein
|
|||
|
published an extension to his theory, the General Theory of
|
|||
|
Relativity, which incorporated a CURVED four-dimensional
|
|||
|
space-time. It is NOT neccesary to assume a 5th dimension in
|
|||
|
which the other four are curved, as it is possible to deduce
|
|||
|
the curvature from observations inside a four-dimensional
|
|||
|
space. Therefore, space-time is a curved FOUR-DIMENSIONAL
|
|||
|
continuum.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5. Current theories
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the attempt to "marry" general relativity, quantum
|
|||
|
mechanics and elementary partical physics, more dimensions
|
|||
|
HAVE been postulated. However, these dimensions only show
|
|||
|
up at enormous energies (where 1 PROTON has an energy
|
|||
|
measured in joules!!) therefore, these theories are pure
|
|||
|
speculation at the moment, until some experimental evidence
|
|||
|
comes along or until some of the predicted low-energy
|
|||
|
phenomena are discovered.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Appendix A
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the classical view, light and sound waves travel in a
|
|||
|
manner similar to that of a swimmer through water. The
|
|||
|
Michelson-Morely experiment was essentially this:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Take two equally good swimmers. One will swim a distance L
|
|||
|
downstream and back, and the other will swim the same
|
|||
|
distance perpendicular to the first (not allowing the
|
|||
|
current to drag him downstream). We shall call:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
v - the speed of the stream (the Earth's speed in the
|
|||
|
ether)
|
|||
|
c - the speed of the swimmers (the speed of light)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For the first swimmer:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Downstream:
|
|||
|
d = L distance
|
|||
|
V = v+c velocity
|
|||
|
t = L/(v+c) time
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Upstream:
|
|||
|
d = L distance
|
|||
|
V = c-v velocity
|
|||
|
t = L/(c-v) time
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Total:
|
|||
|
2 2
|
|||
|
T1 = 2Lc/(c - v )
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For the second swimmer:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Both ways:
|
|||
|
d = L distance
|
|||
|
2 2 0.5
|
|||
|
V = (c - v ) velocity (don't forget
|
|||
|
the current)
|
|||
|
t = L/V time
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Total:
|
|||
|
2 2 0.5
|
|||
|
T2 = 2L/(c -v )
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2 2 0.5
|
|||
|
T1/T2 = c/(c - v ) >=1 ratio of times
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Therefore, the beam traveling up/downstream ALWAYS takes
|
|||
|
longer than the beam traveling cross-stream. It is this
|
|||
|
effect that Michelson and Morely looked for.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
References
|
|||
|
==========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fundamental University Physics / Alonso & Finn
|
|||
|
A Second Course of Light / McKenzie
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Suggested Reading
|
|||
|
=================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Weitzman Institute high-school physics books (Hebrew)
|