215 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
215 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here's the full text of the initiative that just passed (Yay!), and
|
||
|
a couple of arguments for its passage. I scanned it from my voters
|
||
|
pamphlet, and make no guarantees whatsoever.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-k
|
||
|
|
||
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY MEASURE A
|
||
|
MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL USE INITIATIVE
|
||
|
|
||
|
(Full Text of Proposed Initiative)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The people of the County of Santa Cruz do ordain as follows:
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 1. TITLE: The title of this ordinance shall be: The Santa Cruz County
|
||
|
Medical Marijuana Ordinance.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 2. PURPOSE: The purposes of this ordinance are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
(1) To express the compassion of the people of Santa Cruz County for the
|
||
|
medically challenged in our community whose sufferings would be alleviated by
|
||
|
the use of medical marijuana.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(2) To express the strong support of the people of Santa Cruz County for
|
||
|
the restoration of Cannabis / Marijuana medical preparations to the list of
|
||
|
available medicines which can be prescribed by licensed physicians.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(3) To direct the elected officials of Santa Cruz County to take whatever
|
||
|
actions may be within their power to support the availability of Cannabis /
|
||
|
Marijuana for medical use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this ordinance, Cannabis / Mari-
|
||
|
juana medical preparations shall mean: all products made from cannabis or
|
||
|
marijuana, in any form intended or used for human consumption, for the treat-
|
||
|
ment of any disease; the relief of pain; or as an adjunct to any medical
|
||
|
procedure for the treatment of Cancer, Glaucoma, or AIDS; or for any other
|
||
|
medical or healing purpose defined within the bounds of the doctor/patient
|
||
|
relationship.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 4. FINDINGS: The people of the County of Santa Cruz make the
|
||
|
following findings:
|
||
|
|
||
|
(1) SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MEDICINE. Scientific and medical studies by the
|
||
|
National Academy of Science have shown Cannabis / Marijuana to be a safe and
|
||
|
effective medicine with very low toxicity compared to most prescription
|
||
|
drugs. It has been shown to be effective in the treatment of glaucoma; epi-
|
||
|
lepsy; muscle spasticity; arthritis; the nausea, vomiting and appetite loss
|
||
|
associated with chemotherapies; anxiety and depression; and the symptoms of
|
||
|
withdrawal from alcohol and narcotics.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(2) DOCTORS AND PATIENTS NEED THE CANNABIS / MARIJUANA OPTION.
|
||
|
Studies show that one-third of all cancer patients discontinue potentially
|
||
|
life-saving chemotherapy due to the severe and debilitating side effects.
|
||
|
The same is true for many AIDS patients receiving AZT or other similar thera-
|
||
|
pies. Most physicians surveyed said that they would prescribe Cannabis /
|
||
|
Marijuana if legally available. Half of all cancer specialists surveyed said
|
||
|
that they have already encouraged at least one of their patients to break the
|
||
|
law and use Cannabis / Marijuana to ease the violent nausea and vomiting
|
||
|
associated with their current treatments.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(3) UNITED NATIONS APPROVES PRESCRIPTION MARIJUANA. In May of 1991, the
|
||
|
United Nations Narcotic Control Board voted overwhelmingly to reclassify
|
||
|
Cannabis / Marijuana, placing it back on Schedule 2, and making it available
|
||
|
by prescription. The United States Representative to this board voted in
|
||
|
favor of rescheduling.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(4) FEDERAL COURT ORDERS PRESCRIPTION MARIJUANA. Despite a Federal Court
|
||
|
Order recognizing the "clearly established medical value" of Cannabis /
|
||
|
Marijuana, and mandating that it be recbssified to Schedule 2 and available
|
||
|
by prescription, the federal government continues to deny access to this safe
|
||
|
and effective medicine.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(5) POLITICS BEFORE PATIENTS. By its own admission, the federal government
|
||
|
continues to deny access to Cannabis / Marijuana for political rather than
|
||
|
medical reasons. Using patients as pawns in the ever-escalating War on Drugs,
|
||
|
current policies place message before medicine, convenience before compassion,
|
||
|
and politics before patients.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 5. IMPLEMENTATION.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(1) Within 90 (ninety) days of the certification of the November 3, 1992
|
||
|
General Election, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors shall transmit
|
||
|
the text of this ordinance to the President of the United States, the Gover-
|
||
|
nor of the State of California, and the Federal and State Legislative Rep-
|
||
|
resentatives of Santa Cruz County and urge them to take whatever actions
|
||
|
that may be in their power to:
|
||
|
|
||
|
(A) Restore Cannabis / Marijuana medical preparations to the list of
|
||
|
available medicines which can be prescribed by licensed physicians.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(B) Provide for by law and institute such mechanisms as may be necessary
|
||
|
to insure a safe and affordable supply of Cannabis / Marijuana for medi-
|
||
|
cal use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(2) The Board of Supervisors shall request the Sheriff and the District
|
||
|
Attorney to adhere to the spirit of this ordinance in setting their prior-
|
||
|
ites and to exercise whatever discretionary powers they may possess to mini-
|
||
|
mize the negative impacts of current Cannabis / Marijuana restrictbns, where
|
||
|
medical use is apparent.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(3) The Board of Supervisors shall direct the Santa Cruz County Health Ser-
|
||
|
vices Agency to monitor developments in the field of Cannabis / Marijuana
|
||
|
medicine, including research projects, trial studies, or current govemmental
|
||
|
programs and to make available, upon request by any doctor or patient, accu-
|
||
|
rate and timely information regarding the efficacy of Cannabis / Marijuana
|
||
|
for various medical conditions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any of these provisions are held to be invalid,
|
||
|
all remaining portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and
|
||
|
effect.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect as provided by
|
||
|
law.
|
||
|
|
||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
|
||
|
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL
|
||
|
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY MEASURE A
|
||
|
MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL USE INITIATIVE
|
||
|
|
||
|
If approved by a majority of those voting on this measure, it will become a
|
||
|
County ordinance. The measure appears on the ballot as a result of initiative
|
||
|
petitions which gathered more than the number of signatures required by state
|
||
|
law for placement on the ballot.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If enacted, the measure will not change existing laws on the availability of
|
||
|
marijuana for medical purposes, or on the illegality of marijuana possession.
|
||
|
Rather, the measure would constitute a policy statement favoring the increased
|
||
|
availability of marijuana for medical purposes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If enacted, the measure would require the Santa Cruz County Board of Super-
|
||
|
visors to take certain actions to communicate the policy to State and Federal
|
||
|
elected officials. The Board of Supervisors would also be required to request
|
||
|
the Sheriff and District Attorney of Santa Cruz County to adhere to the
|
||
|
spirit of the ordinance in setting their priorities, and to minimize the neg-
|
||
|
ative impacts of legal restrictions on marijuana for medical use to the ex-
|
||
|
tent they have discretion to do so. Because no change in the criminal law on
|
||
|
this subject results from its enactment, however, the second directive to the
|
||
|
Sheriff and District Attorney is of uncertain effect.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Board of Supervisors would also be nequired to direct the County Health
|
||
|
Services Agency to monitor research developments and make information avail-
|
||
|
able concerning medical use of marijuana. Such activities by the Health Ser-
|
||
|
vices Agency would be a County cost in an undetermined amount.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A "yes" vote authorizes enactment of the measure into the Santa Cruz County
|
||
|
Code and approves making the Findings set out in the measure. A "no" vote
|
||
|
rejects enactment of the measure as a part of the Santa Cruz County Code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
DWIGHT L. HERR
|
||
|
County Counsel
|
||
|
By/ Jane M. Scott
|
||
|
Assistant County Counsel
|
||
|
|
||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
|
||
|
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A
|
||
|
|
||
|
"My commitment as a physician is to ease suffering and to do no harm. Both
|
||
|
are often possible with cannabis medicines. The government's policy of deny-
|
||
|
ing patients this treatment is indefensible. It's a matter of compassion and
|
||
|
common sense. Vote yes on Measure A."
|
||
|
-Arnold Leff, MD-
|
||
|
|
||
|
The emotional and financial impacts of catastrophic illness can be devas-
|
||
|
tating. For the thousands of seriously ill and disabled Americans who have
|
||
|
a medical necessity for cannabis/marijuana, the devastation is compounded by
|
||
|
a government that ignores the best medical evidence and condemns them to a
|
||
|
criminal black market in their daily struggle for wellness.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Measure A calls on the federal government to allow licensed physicians to
|
||
|
prescribe marijuana for patients with life and sense threatening illnesses.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vote Yes on Measure A.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Controlled Substances Act allows for cannabis to be restored to the list
|
||
|
of available medicines if "a significant minority of physicians have accepted
|
||
|
it as safe under medical supervision."
|
||
|
|
||
|
In 1988, after the most extensive review of the record ever undertaken, US
|
||
|
Administrative Law Judge Francis Young stated that "marijuana in its natural
|
||
|
form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By
|
||
|
any rational analysis cannabis can be used safely under a supervised routine
|
||
|
of medical care."
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vote Yes on Measune A.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dr. Leff and Judge Young are not alone. Seventy percent of cancer specialists,
|
||
|
35 state legislatures (including California), the United Nations Narcotics
|
||
|
Control Board, the Califomia Medical Association, and 80% of San Francisco
|
||
|
voters agree - cannabis should be available to the seriously ill and disabled
|
||
|
to ease their pain and suffering.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Measure A will ease suffering and do no harm.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Simply stated, Measure A is good medicine.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vote Yes for Compassion. Vote Yes for Common Sense.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vote Yes on Measure A.
|
||
|
|
||
|
s/ Scott Imler
|
||
|
|
||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
|
||
|
NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|