281 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
281 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
From: Donald E. Kimberlin
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As our Moderator's response said, Telex certainly should be
|
|||
|
called the original form of E-Mail. Far from "dead" on a global basis,
|
|||
|
UN reports published in the "Brittanica Book of the Year" indicate
|
|||
|
there are about three million Telex lines around the globe. Contrary
|
|||
|
to the impression international telephone people like to create,
|
|||
|
direct, immediate access via Telex still exists to more of the world's
|
|||
|
political entities than does telephone. This has been the case for
|
|||
|
many years. (Totalitarian governments must like Telex; they have been
|
|||
|
known to shut down telephone service, but not Telex. The suspected
|
|||
|
reason: It can be monitored with hard copy easily, and has often been
|
|||
|
done,too. Of course, they themselves use it for military messages.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Telex sprang from the same source as the Volkswagon automo-
|
|||
|
bile: The creative growth era of the early Third Reich. It was devised
|
|||
|
as a means to distribute military command and control messages and
|
|||
|
data in a time before we even had a structure for data processing
|
|||
|
machinery. What existed at that point in time was 45.5 bps Baudot
|
|||
|
automatic telegraphy and dial-pulsing telephone exchanges. The
|
|||
|
original Telex was essentially (director-controlled; yes, the
|
|||
|
Europeans were doing that then) rotary telephone switches modified to
|
|||
|
carry DC telegraph lines, providing a switched service for
|
|||
|
teletypewriters in the same way as was done for telephones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There was one major difference: Intercity transmission
|
|||
|
facilites were expensive and in short supply, and one analog telephone
|
|||
|
circuit between cities could carry 24 (and in some applications, 25)
|
|||
|
telegraph channels bearing Telex. The economics are obvious, and
|
|||
|
probably are what keep Telex important in the Third World today.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In that era of transparent analog transmission lines, Telex
|
|||
|
was easily able to use telephone dial-pulsing on the local telegraph
|
|||
|
loops followed by Baudot teletype for the messages ... and it did.
|
|||
|
Hence, this form of Telex operation became known as "type A Telex
|
|||
|
signaling." It is still used that way in many nations. In those you
|
|||
|
will see a teleprinter with a control box that has a telephone dial.
|
|||
|
When Western Union decided it had should enter into Telex in the U.S.,
|
|||
|
it adopted the original style and Type A signaling. Similarly, many
|
|||
|
other Europeans adopted Type A operations, among them the U.K., France
|
|||
|
and Belgium as well as others. Meantime, (I think it was L. M.
|
|||
|
Ericsson leading the move for) others saw an opportunity to simply use
|
|||
|
the numerics on the keyboard for call set-up, thus some nations
|
|||
|
adopted what became known as "Type B" Telex. By this time, the CCITT
|
|||
|
had taken charge and was setting international agreements, one of
|
|||
|
which was to set the speed of international Baudot circuits at 50
|
|||
|
Baud, instead of 45.5. Some few nations were many years behind in
|
|||
|
upspeeding. In this writer's experience, Cuba and Pakistan are
|
|||
|
remembered as still running 45.5 Baud Telex trunks even into the
|
|||
|
1970's.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Telex grew around the world very rapidly ... long before
|
|||
|
automatic telephony, again most likely due to its economics of channel
|
|||
|
usage. Considerable networks of Telex on HF (shortwave) radio to
|
|||
|
then-remote areas of Africa, the Middle East and Asia were established
|
|||
|
by the government-owned PTTs, operating non-stop with error-correcting,
|
|||
|
retransmitting time division multiplexers per CCITT Recommendation
|
|||
|
R.44 (so what's new about TDM ... Baudot built his first one in 1873,
|
|||
|
three years _before_ Bell's telephone. Check it out, unbelievers!),
|
|||
|
with the common name "TOR" for "Telex Over Radio." Readers who are
|
|||
|
SWL's certainly hear of TOR, SITOR and Telex Mux on shortwave radio
|
|||
|
today ... there's still plenty around and on the air.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Also, the broad reach and universality of Telex around the
|
|||
|
world lead to the CCITT establishing the global network of
|
|||
|
International Telegram (commonly called Cablegram; RCA's product on
|
|||
|
its original shortwave radio was the Radiogram) channels on a switched
|
|||
|
network overlay of Telex called "Gentex." That's right: Your
|
|||
|
international cablegram goes on Telex, too. It's simply Telex
|
|||
|
channels dialed up permanently between telegram offices. The beauty
|
|||
|
is that of any switched service: Restoration in case of channel
|
|||
|
failure is simply dialing up another call.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The result of all this is that Telex was, and remains in many
|
|||
|
nations, _the_ mediumn of communications for business and both civil
|
|||
|
and military government use. Airlines using the PARS (and
|
|||
|
internationally IPARS) reservations systems still run Baudot code
|
|||
|
today (although many lines have changed to high-speed modem traffic),
|
|||
|
because their plain-language text transmissions use only 7.5 bits per
|
|||
|
character, compared to the 11 bits of CCITT International Alphabet 5
|
|||
|
(known as ASCII in colloqial North America). The economics are
|
|||
|
obvious. In many nations, the total minutes of international Telex
|
|||
|
still today exceeds that of international telephone traffic. Business
|
|||
|
uses Telex more than most Americans understand. West Germany has had
|
|||
|
more than 400,000 Telex lines for years, while the U.S. at its peak
|
|||
|
could count only 345,000 Telex _and_ TWX subscribers. Americans
|
|||
|
simply grew up as sociological prisoners of "the phone," under a
|
|||
|
hegemony that taught them anything else must be insignificant.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Almost in parallel with the 1930's development of Telex, Bell
|
|||
|
interests saw the possibilities and decided to do Telex one better.
|
|||
|
Bell Labs was commissioned to develop a simialr service, using dial
|
|||
|
pulse selection. It became known as Teletypewriter Exchange Service,
|
|||
|
or TWX. (In fact, Bell beat WUTCo to the marketplace punch and WUTCo
|
|||
|
came along later with Telex in the U.S.) The original TWX ran 75 bps
|
|||
|
with Baudot code and dial selection, until Bell Labs got its second
|
|||
|
generation ready. That one, called "four-row TWX" in telephone
|
|||
|
parlance, used *modems* called "101 Data Sets" (that's right, Daddy of
|
|||
|
the 103!) on two-wire ordinary telephone subscriber lines run to
|
|||
|
special exchanges called a WADS (Wide Area Data Service) exchange in
|
|||
|
each major city, where the billing and such was done. Actually, a
|
|||
|
WADS exchange was a partition of one local telephone exchange in the
|
|||
|
city. Because it was using the Public Switched Telephone Network (DDD
|
|||
|
in American parlance, TWX was given reserved area codes ... 510, 610,
|
|||
|
710, 810 and 910. Some few remote locations on TWX are still on those
|
|||
|
area codes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Four-row TWX used 11-bit characters to provide an expanded
|
|||
|
code set including "control characters" that permitted the TWX machine
|
|||
|
to be operated much like an office typewriter ... more so than Telex
|
|||
|
and its Baudot limitations that at best used CCITT-standardized
|
|||
|
"character strings" to provide some degree of functionality beyond
|
|||
|
plain text (see the CCITT F, R and S Series of Recommenda- tions). The
|
|||
|
control characters of TWX provided paragraph indents, form feeds and
|
|||
|
such that Telex never really had. And, with Four-Row TWX,
|
|||
|
transmission (on the 101 Data Set) was upped to 110 bps, and the code
|
|||
|
provided VRC "parity" error-checking. (One can show that 110 bps with
|
|||
|
11-bit characters is equivalent to about 140-150 words per minute, a
|
|||
|
typing speed only Olympic-class typists could achieve on mechanical
|
|||
|
typewriters.) Even so, the "TWX code" had only 93 of its 128 possible
|
|||
|
characters assigned.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It just so happened that when the computer era came along,
|
|||
|
Bell's Teletype Corporation (at Skokie, Il, purchased from Dr.
|
|||
|
Kleinschmidt to get a supply of teleprinters for TWX) had its Model 33
|
|||
|
teleprinter in production for TWX. That was, in its time, the
|
|||
|
cheapest keyboard instrument readily available for the then-"new"
|
|||
|
computer business. The Model 33 teleprinter and its mechanically-
|
|||
|
embedded TWX code became the _de_facto_ I/O device for the computer.
|
|||
|
The computer people early on wanted use of all the character
|
|||
|
combinations in the code, so Teletype obliged with modifications for
|
|||
|
computers. Thus ASCII was born of TWX code, and it ultimately became
|
|||
|
CCITT International Telegraph Alphabet Number 5. The IA5 definitions
|
|||
|
in the CCITT books vary from ASCII only in wording. Study of both
|
|||
|
ASCII and IA5 can show roots of most of the character combinations
|
|||
|
back to Baudot (or its CCITT character strings) and even manual
|
|||
|
telegraphy.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
However, computer programmers and computer mux makers who don't
|
|||
|
understand this have often done some horrible things to uses of the
|
|||
|
code, causing products that alienate people from data communications;
|
|||
|
wondering why their products don't migrate well or why people have
|
|||
|
trouble understanding them. There is a certain beauty of human logic
|
|||
|
in using these codes properly. They grew out of manual operations in
|
|||
|
sending messages. One can even see in IBM's BCDIC and later EBCDIC an
|
|||
|
emulation of what was in the telegraphic codes, but I doubt IBMer's
|
|||
|
for their part would admit that.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While Telex was the rest of the world, insular America grew
|
|||
|
with its parallel Telex of WUTCo and TWX of Bell. Because Bell was
|
|||
|
strictly limited to dial telephony only for international business,
|
|||
|
and because WUTCo had given up its international operations in a 1939
|
|||
|
deal to monopolize domestic telegraph business by taking over ITT's
|
|||
|
Postal Telegraph (which was a thorn in WUTCo's side), the U.S.
|
|||
|
developed a unique sort of "international telegraph" company known as
|
|||
|
an "International Record Carrier." The IRC's were an interesting
|
|||
|
catch-all sort of firm; an American answer to "how do we get a regu-
|
|||
|
latory handle on all these characters?" Some were US-based, like
|
|||
|
WUTCo's "Cable System" that became Western Union International when
|
|||
|
sold off as a result of the 1939 Postal Telegraph deal. Others had
|
|||
|
"just been there," like ITT's World Communications that had been a
|
|||
|
gaggle of companies with names like Federal Telegraph, All American
|
|||
|
Cables and Radio, Globe Wireless, Press Wireless, and the common
|
|||
|
carrier part of Mackay Marine. RCA Communications had been around
|
|||
|
specializing largely in spanning the Pacific with radio as well as
|
|||
|
generally reaching ships and other places by radio telegraphy; today
|
|||
|
it is the RCA Globecom subsidiary of MCI (as is WUI, calling itself
|
|||
|
MCI International). Tropical Radiotelegraph grew out of putting radio
|
|||
|
telegraph on shipboard before WWI so its owners, the United Fruit
|
|||
|
Company of Boston could divert shiploads of bananas to the best market,
|
|||
|
expanding to communications to its plantations, then becoming in
|
|||
|
some nations the public telegraph and international telephone company
|
|||
|
of the nation; today it is TRT Telecommunications. The French
|
|||
|
Telegraph Cable Company, owned by French investors in the PTT had been
|
|||
|
in the U.S. since the days of Monsier Puyer-Quartier laying telegraph
|
|||
|
cables from France to the U.S., hence its telegraphic routing address,
|
|||
|
PQ. Even the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company owned its own IRD, the
|
|||
|
Trans-Liberia Radiotelegraph Company, operating HF radio from Akron to
|
|||
|
its rubber plantations in Liberia. (TL is still there in Akron, as a
|
|||
|
matter of fact.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All these firms formed the U.S. IRC business and enjoyed a
|
|||
|
period of regulated competitiveness for thirty years or so. They were the
|
|||
|
Telex interface between the U.S. and the world, all connecting out to
|
|||
|
WUTCo Telex and (by performing "protocol conversion" long before
|
|||
|
computers did so,) Bell TWX. International Telex users were
|
|||
|
confronted with some typical American confusion ... they had to prefix
|
|||
|
their Telex calls to America with added digits to steer their call via
|
|||
|
the IRC of their choice (in most nations) and then to either Telex or
|
|||
|
TWX for the U.S. domestic connection.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All that had to change when Congress "deregulated" the IRC's
|
|||
|
in 1982, four years before telephony had a similar change. Restric-
|
|||
|
tions on AT&T providing only telephony were lifted; the IRC's were
|
|||
|
freed to operate anyplace as compared to a limited number of "gateway
|
|||
|
cities," WUTCo was permitted to go international once again, and
|
|||
|
everybody could compete for any kind of business.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
That's what has happened in America, so you can call FTCC
|
|||
|
(formerly French Cable) as well as relative newcomers to the U.S.
|
|||
|
market like Cable & Wireless (from the U.K.) and ask them what deal
|
|||
|
they will offer in competition to AT&T or WUTCo, either domestically
|
|||
|
or internationally, for voice, data or video.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
International Telex remains a basic business. The various
|
|||
|
companies made various deals to interface to their Telex connections.
|
|||
|
MCI's is, of course, via WUI, the first IRC that MCI bought.
|
|||
|
AT&TMail's is via TRT. Along the evolutionary course of the later days
|
|||
|
of the IRC business, a firm was established called Graphic Scanning
|
|||
|
(IRC's have always tried to do something with facsimile, long before
|
|||
|
Group III machines made them the Office Toy of 1990, and Graphic
|
|||
|
Scanning got into the IRC field in this way), and Graphnet is
|
|||
|
Telenet's Telex connection.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As our moderator said, the E-Mail services all "alias" your
|
|||
|
E-Mail address to their IRC connection. It's usually your numeric
|
|||
|
E-Mail address with a fixed prefix. Example: My own AT&TMail numeric
|
|||
|
is 7281481. Its Telex alias is 157281481. On MCIMail, my numeric is
|
|||
|
4133373,and its Telex alias is 650-4133373.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The global Telex network has had since inception a handy
|
|||
|
"confirmation' convention called "Who Are You?" and each Telex machine
|
|||
|
is encoded with an "automatic answerback" that lets you know on
|
|||
|
connection and whenever you ask (WRU in Baudot; <ctrl-E> in ASCII)
|
|||
|
what machine you are connected to. So, if you are an E-Mail user,
|
|||
|
your overseas correspondent will want to know your "network"and
|
|||
|
"answerback." That's usually the Telex code for the IRC you're with
|
|||
|
and your E-Mail aplha address. So, mine on MCIMail is MCI UW
|
|||
|
dkimberlin and on AT&TMail mine is TRT UT dkimberlin. Really rather
|
|||
|
simple, when you understand the meaning and purpose of the IRC and
|
|||
|
international Telex.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One last word for this top-level exposition: Telex isn't so
|
|||
|
cheap compared to E-Mail. If you have a regular correspondent in
|
|||
|
another nation and want to DDD to batch files, or if you have an X.25
|
|||
|
or Teletex route to another nation (WUTCo's Easylink E-Mail does, but
|
|||
|
the other E-Mails seem to say,"huh? Teletex?"), that may well be
|
|||
|
cheaper than Telex. It runs at 50 bps, just 66 words per minute, and
|
|||
|
you get billed at the Telex output rate.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All that said, then why bother? Well, Telex is still there and
|
|||
|
readily accessible from your E-Mail, and it reaches those 3-1/2
|
|||
|
million or so machines in offices of foreign nations you may have only
|
|||
|
occasional traffic for. And, those machines are in global directories
|
|||
|
like the Jaeger u. Waldmann directories so you can look them up from
|
|||
|
home. And, those machines are in hotels all around the world, so you
|
|||
|
can get a message to the traveler who hasn't been able to get a phone
|
|||
|
line out for three days. And, those Telex lines connect to all the
|
|||
|
cablegram offices that will for their high price, still send a
|
|||
|
messenger to _find_ your missing salesman (unlike the US' rapidly
|
|||
|
deteriorating telegram service). As well, they reach the ships at sea
|
|||
|
with your Telex to roust up the staffer who's on an ocean cruise. No
|
|||
|
matter where in the world they are; no matter what time zone they are
|
|||
|
in, no matter if they are on the Gregorian or Moslem or Hindu or
|
|||
|
Bhuddist calendar, your message routed by Telex should get to them far
|
|||
|
more efficiently than random dialing of the phone.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So, while most Americans discovered some of these advantages
|
|||
|
when the Group III fax came along, but still need to find a "fax
|
|||
|
number" that's not in a directory like Jaeger u. Waldmann, your E-Mail
|
|||
|
connection to international Telex is a potentially useful tool.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(For those who may want a fuller, more detailed explanation,
|
|||
|
Datapro Research offers reprints of a 22-page 1986 report they had me
|
|||
|
author, numbered MT20-510-101, by calling (800) 328-3776. Readers who
|
|||
|
have Datapro's "Nanagement of Telecommunications" service may have
|
|||
|
this at hand.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A final riposte: Our Moderator said in commenting to the question:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
>In case you were wondering, FAX is the (FA)csimile E(X)change.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Au contraire, notre cher moduerateur. While some marketeers of recent
|
|||
|
facsimile service offerings may have made that linkage, the term "fax"
|
|||
|
has been used generically by the much more limited group of facsimile
|
|||
|
(including telephoto) users from telecomm time immemorial.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Downloaded from Just Say Yes. 2 lines, More than 1500 files online!
|
|||
|
Do you write? Give us a call! 415-922-2008 CASFA
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|