397 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
397 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
||
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
||
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
||
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
February 15, 1992
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
WRIGHT1.ASC
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
Walter Wright is a very good friend of ours here at KeelyNet and we
|
||
|
|
have finally gotten around to getting some of his papers typed up.
|
||
|
|
Walter has been actively researching the PUSH gravity concept and
|
||
|
|
has developed some astounding physical models to prove his point.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When we first heard of him and his claims, we had some trouble
|
||
|
|
believing. But after seeing his videos we changed our minds.
|
||
|
|
Walter was kind enough to allow me to visit his home and workshop
|
||
|
|
where I was further stimulated to get his work out to the public to
|
||
|
|
the best of the ability of KeelyNet. Surprisingly enough, the more
|
||
|
|
advanced researchers tend to support the PUSH gravity concept,
|
||
|
|
particularly the Tachyon field theories of Nieper.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
One of the first arguments against Push Gravity is that if true, we
|
||
|
|
would all be pushed off the planet, however, Walter only claims the
|
||
|
|
PUSH concept to be valid in regard to CELESTIAL BODIES.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We also ask you to keep in mind that Walter NEVER claimed that
|
||
|
|
gravity is magnetic in nature. He finds that magnetic fields
|
||
|
|
exhibit the push/pull characteristics which most closely emulate the
|
||
|
|
effects of the pushing energy known as gravity.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
At the outset, we give you Walters address, since he is most
|
||
|
|
interested in hearing from people interested in the PUSH GRAVITY
|
||
|
|
theory. Walter also has published a book "Gravity is a Push" which
|
||
|
|
you can buy through the mail for $12 postpaid. If you do write to
|
||
|
|
Walter, please tell him you found out about his work through
|
||
|
|
KeelyNet, we would appreciate it. THANKS....Jerry, Ron and Chuck...
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
W. C. Wright
|
||
|
|
732 Ohio Street
|
||
|
|
Fairfield, CA 94533
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
The following text was written by Walter Wright in the early 1980's.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A few thoughts by the author in passing...
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I believe when you read my theory with an "OPEN MIND" that you
|
||
|
|
will see through it readily. When you try to present this subject
|
||
|
|
to the right people it is almost an impossibility. They are more
|
||
|
|
interested in "WHO YOU ARE" rather than what do you have to offer.
|
||
|
|
To me this is "SICK".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 1
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
That man that is a mechanic is never supposed to have any good
|
||
|
|
ideas about baking and a baker isn't supposed to be able to offer
|
||
|
|
any good advice to a mechanic. I believe all of us here on earth
|
||
|
|
have at least one good idea to offer SOCIETY and I believe that
|
||
|
|
this idea should be checked out by the experts to the fullest.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I would appreciate a letter from you to me to let me know just
|
||
|
|
what your opinion on this theory is. I am well aware of the fact,
|
||
|
|
that when you have something new to offer in an old subject, that
|
||
|
|
you are asking for your head to be chopped off. I am not afraid
|
||
|
|
of the ax.
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
I made world news in March, 1979, when UPI wrote the following under
|
||
|
|
a large caption of "MAN'S THEORY OF GRAVITY IS 'PUSHING' AND NOT
|
||
|
|
'PULLING'."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
FAIRFIELD (UPI) -- A retired railroad signalman and self-taught
|
||
|
|
physicist says Sir Isaac Newton drew the wrong conclusion when
|
||
|
|
the apple of destiny plopped on his head almost 300 years ago.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Walter Wright, 60, says he isn't arguing that gravity doesn't
|
||
|
|
exist, only that it works in reverse from the way Newton thought
|
||
|
|
- by "pushing" objects apart rather than "pulling" them together.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Gravity isn't a pulling force," Wright says. "If bodies in
|
||
|
|
space were attracted to one another, they'd always be colliding.
|
||
|
|
But that doesn't happen." (Walter calls this the bunch-of-grapes
|
||
|
|
theory since if Gravity truly attracted, then all masses would
|
||
|
|
clump together into one giant cluster of grapes.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Wright's basic idea -- which he says is borne out by his
|
||
|
|
experiments and calculations -- is that gravity doesn't emanate
|
||
|
|
from the earth's core, it comes from the sun.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
He argues that the sun, because it is a huge mass in a constant
|
||
|
|
state of combustion, emits forces which push or "squeeze" objects
|
||
|
|
toward the earth -- like Newton's apple.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the 40-year veteran of Southern Pacific railroad yards is
|
||
|
|
correct, of course, his ideas would put him in a class with
|
||
|
|
Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein. And after all, Einstein was
|
||
|
|
only a postal clerk when he wrote his General Theory of
|
||
|
|
Relativity.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Wright's gray-shingled home in this small Northern California
|
||
|
|
town overflows with black boxes housing small magnets that spin,
|
||
|
|
twist and roll and, he says, demonstrate the illogic of Newton's
|
||
|
|
ideas.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
He uses galaxies passing through each other in deep space as an
|
||
|
|
illustration of his ideas. The stars usually don't collide
|
||
|
|
because they REPEL or PUSH EACH OTHER APART, he said.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Wright's views are understandably unpopular with some physicists,
|
||
|
|
although he says one mathematician who attended a demonstration
|
||
|
|
of his theories told him his ideas were just as valid as most
|
||
|
|
accepted theories of physics.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 2
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Other scientists tell me they don't believe me, but they can't
|
||
|
|
disprove my theories," Wright said.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Physics Professor Eugene D. Commins at the University of
|
||
|
|
California, who knew Einstein personally, called the notion of
|
||
|
|
push-gravity "totally false. I say that without qualification."
|
||
|
|
He said where Newtonian physics doesn't explain gravitational
|
||
|
|
forces, Einstein's General Relativity theory does.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Wright is unfazed, particularly since his novel ideas have made
|
||
|
|
him a sort of guru to what he calls his "following" of teenage
|
||
|
|
science students, sci-fi fans and even some physical scientists
|
||
|
|
he calls "unbrainwashed" by Newtonian physics.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
He said the New York-based Carlton Press plans to publish his
|
||
|
|
book, "Gravity is a Push," in the next two months. In the book,
|
||
|
|
Wright claims, he succeeds where Einstein failed - in developing
|
||
|
|
a unified field theory.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On September 10, 1979, I presented my physical models on Channel 13,
|
||
|
|
KOVR, for a full hour on a program called "Morning Scene" and here
|
||
|
|
is a letter I received from Chet Casselman who hosted the program :
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Dear Walter,
|
||
|
|
I just want to know how pleased we were with your
|
||
|
|
performance on "Morning Scene" the other day. It was an
|
||
|
|
excellent presentation of a number of simple demonstrations of
|
||
|
|
some pretty complicated theories. I have to say your theories
|
||
|
|
were not only 'interesting', but made VERY GOOD SENSE, TOO. We
|
||
|
|
got some very intriguing questions on the air after your
|
||
|
|
exhibits, I thought, and you handled the questions quite well.
|
||
|
|
As a matter of fact, we're still getting phone inquiries from
|
||
|
|
viewers who want to know how to get in touch with you or where
|
||
|
|
they can find a copy of your book "Gravity Is a Push". Maybe we
|
||
|
|
can get you back for another visit one day. Thanks again for a
|
||
|
|
very stimulating program.
|
||
|
|
Chet Casselman
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
From the World Book Encyclopedia copyrighted in 1938:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The sun pulls the earth with 175 times the force that the moon
|
||
|
|
does."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In order for physicists to account for the Newton Theory that says
|
||
|
|
the moon pulls the earth with twice the force that the sun does,
|
||
|
|
here is their explanation in the Americana Encyclopedia, page 613 in
|
||
|
|
Volume 27 under "TIDES" that was copyrighted in 1965.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"A slight modification to Newton's law occurs in the mathematics
|
||
|
|
of this problem."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you change the pull of the sun from 175 times greater than the
|
||
|
|
pull of the moon mathematically, to end up saying the pull of the
|
||
|
|
sun is only HALF as much as the moon and call that a "slight
|
||
|
|
modification," then I believe you can sell gas to the Arabs for 5
|
||
|
|
bucks a gallon.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 3
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
At Calumet, Michigan, in 1901 they took two piano wires 4,250 feet
|
||
|
|
long plumb bobs attached and dropped them down two mine shafts 4,250
|
||
|
|
feet apart. They expected the pull of gravity, which is supposed to
|
||
|
|
be in the center of the earth, to pull these two plumb bobs closer
|
||
|
|
together. Much to their surprise they found out the wires at the
|
||
|
|
bottom WERE FURTHER APART than they were at the top. This led them
|
||
|
|
to believe that:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Maybe there is no such thing as MASS ATTRACTION."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The above science subjects provides me with more evidence to be even
|
||
|
|
a bigger "NON-BELIEVER" in the Newtonian Gravity theory.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
April 27, 1979...Washington (UPI) -- "UNIVERSE WILL EXPAND
|
||
|
|
FOREVER."...New evidence supports the idea the universe will
|
||
|
|
continue to EXPAND FOREVER and escape contraction to a BIG CRUNCH
|
||
|
|
billions of years from now," said Dr. Giaconni of the Smithsonian
|
||
|
|
Astrophysical Observatory.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
That kind of puts a damper on Newton's PULL THEORY.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
From a book called "PSYCO-CYBERNETICS" by Maltz, M.D., F.I.C.S.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Any breakthrough in science is likely to come from OUTSIDE the
|
||
|
|
system. Experts are the most familiar with the developed
|
||
|
|
knowledge INSIDE THE PRESCRIBED BOUNDARIES of a given science.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Any new knowledge must usually come from the OUTSIDE...not by
|
||
|
|
experts but by what someone has defined as an INPERT."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Pasteur was NOT an M.D. The Wright Brothers were NOT aeronautical
|
||
|
|
engineers, but BICYCLE MECHANICS. Einstein, properly speaking, was
|
||
|
|
NOT a physicist but a mathematician. Yet his findings in
|
||
|
|
mathematics completely turned upside down all the pet theories in
|
||
|
|
physics. So perhaps I am in the process of "TURNING THE GRAVITY
|
||
|
|
UPSIDE DOWN". I'm also an INPERT. Time will tell.
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
We are now venturing into OUTER SPACE, so let us look at the results
|
||
|
|
between Wright and the so called "EXPERTS".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#1 - National Geographic - June, 1975, page 868:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Mercury possesses something else quite unexpected..a magnetic
|
||
|
|
field, though only one percent of earth's.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The 'formula' I wrote prior to this space probe said Mercury
|
||
|
|
had a magnetic field that was one percent of earth's. This
|
||
|
|
is covered in Chapter 10 of my book. I wasn't surprised.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#2 - From a book called "JUPITER THE LARGEST PLANET" by Asimov on
|
||
|
|
page 198:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"The moon lacks a magnetic field". Here is a small portion
|
||
|
|
of a letter sent to me by a professor from the University of
|
||
|
|
Alaska dated January 12th, 1977: "Until the lunar landings,
|
||
|
|
the moon was thought NOT to have a magnetic field."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 4
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Prior to the lunar landing I said the moon HAD a magnetic
|
||
|
|
field. This is covered in Chapter 1 of my book. The
|
||
|
|
professor ended up his letter saying the electronic expert
|
||
|
|
(that is me) has no business in basic science and my theory
|
||
|
|
was "FULL OF HOLES". Did you know that the Nobel Prize in
|
||
|
|
PHYSICS for 1978 was given to two Americans who proved their
|
||
|
|
outer space point by use of the ELECTRON THEORY?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#3 - Channel 9 (KQED), San Francisco - March 5, 1979:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scientists were surprised to find out from Voyager 1 that the
|
||
|
|
magnetic field around Jupiter is SO ENORMOUS and this
|
||
|
|
magnetic field EXTENDS WAY OUT FROM JUPITER.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
My magnetic forumla (same as #1) told me Jupiter's magnetic
|
||
|
|
field WAS MUCH, MUCH STRONGER than Earth's. Once again the
|
||
|
|
SO-CALLED EXPERTS were SURPRISED but I WASN'T.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#4 - The experts were surprised to find Venus and Mars are made
|
||
|
|
from different "stuff" than earth. I wasn't and I cover this
|
||
|
|
subject in Chapter 5 in my book.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#5 - The following is from "THIS WORLD" - March 11, 1979, page 29:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Einstein devoted considerable energy to showing that
|
||
|
|
probability was not the answer to HOW matter was constructed.
|
||
|
|
Time has shown him in the main to have BEEN WRONG. He also
|
||
|
|
made a great attempt in later life to construct his unified
|
||
|
|
field theory that would unite ELECTRO-MAGNETISM, GRAVITY,
|
||
|
|
SPACE and TIME under one set of equations. He wasn't
|
||
|
|
successful."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I have copyrighted two of these equations I feel Einstein was
|
||
|
|
looking for but failed to write. One is a formula for the
|
||
|
|
SPEED of our planets in their orbits AROUND our sun. The
|
||
|
|
other formula is for the DISTANCE that our planets are FROM
|
||
|
|
THE SUN.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There are many other subjects about which the experts were
|
||
|
|
surprised, bewildered, amazed, etc... BUT I WASN'T...
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
In the UPI article Professor Commins said PUSH-GRAVITY is totally
|
||
|
|
false. On July 17, 1979, I wrote to Professor Commins and
|
||
|
|
challenged him to bring his "PULL models" and PROVE ME WRONG at a
|
||
|
|
showing I would be putting on at the Fairfield Moose Lodge on August
|
||
|
|
6, 1979. At this showing I gave evidence with my models to support
|
||
|
|
my theory that our tides are caused by a "magnetic push factor"
|
||
|
|
between our earth and our sun. Professor Commins FAILED TO ACCEPT
|
||
|
|
my challenge. The Fairfield Moose Lodge sent me a very
|
||
|
|
complimentary letter dated August 17, 1979 expressing BELIEF IN MY
|
||
|
|
THEORY.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
My plans for the future are to contact many of the nationally
|
||
|
|
televised programs such as the Phil Donahue Show, Tom Snyder
|
||
|
|
program, etc...and hopefully will get a guest shot. Once again,
|
||
|
|
time will tell.
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 5
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(This was written over 10 years ago and STILL Walter has not
|
||
|
|
been invited for national exposure nor have his theories made
|
||
|
|
the national spotlight IN ANY FORM.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Hopefully someone reading this and other papers relating to
|
||
|
|
Wright's research and theories will arrange to get him the
|
||
|
|
national coverage and recognition which his theories merit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Walter is now 73 years of age and in excellent health, it would
|
||
|
|
be a crowning achievement to his life work that his theories
|
||
|
|
get public and scientific recognition during his lifetime.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
He has spent thousands of dollars of his own money researching
|
||
|
|
and promoting his PUSH gravity work. Every public challenge he
|
||
|
|
has issued has been ignored by established scientists educated
|
||
|
|
in the retarded concept of Newtonian Physics. For those of us
|
||
|
|
who recognize a pioneer in the field, Walter is one who is far
|
||
|
|
ahead of the pack of formally educated scientists. The
|
||
|
|
ramifications of his work to free energy, anti-gravity and
|
||
|
|
space travel are astounding.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note that there ARE NO MODELS TO DEMONSTRATE PULL GRAVITY yet
|
||
|
|
Walter has dozens of WORKING MODELS TO DEMONSTRATE THE VALIDITY
|
||
|
|
OF PUSH GRAVITY.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
||
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
||
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
||
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Page 6
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|