285 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
285 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| File Name : HUMMEL.ASC | Online Date : 06/26/95 |
|
|||
|
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : GRAVITY |
|
|||
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|||
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|||
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|||
|
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
|
|||
|
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|||
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|||
|
Though I had intended to get this online much sooner, serendipity has worked
|
|||
|
greatly in our favor by the delay. Mr. Stewart Harris' TOMI principle, Stefan
|
|||
|
Hartman's idea of shaping the field by use of angle irons on the end as well
|
|||
|
as the open contributions of others who have made the effort to duplicate Mr.
|
|||
|
Harris's fascinating discovery lend that much more credence to how such a
|
|||
|
device as described in this document can be 'self-driven'. (see TMIDEVIC,
|
|||
|
TOMIBILD, TOMIMOTR, TOMIFLAT on KeelyNet for background information)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The following information results from a series of private discussions with
|
|||
|
certain individuals at a recent conference. In order to respect their privacy
|
|||
|
and confidentiality, no names will be mentioned. The information is so
|
|||
|
intriguing that I think it should not be witheld from those who research in
|
|||
|
the areas of anti-gravity or electrical flight...>>> Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
The Hummel Levity Disk
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While at a recent conference, I had the pleasure of meeting John Searl and
|
|||
|
John Thomas. For those who study such matters, you are no doubt aware that
|
|||
|
John Thomas has written a series of books recording details of the Law of the
|
|||
|
Squares and the Searl Levity Disk. These books are fascinating, and I
|
|||
|
PARTICULARY RECOMMEND the first in the series, Anti-Gravity, which sells for
|
|||
|
$25.00. For an excellent overview of the Searl claims, please download the
|
|||
|
file SEARLE3.ZIP from KeelyNet, it is an astounding piece of work excerpted
|
|||
|
from the book, "Anti-Gravity, the Dream made Reality", which John Thomas
|
|||
|
kindly allowed us to put online.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The remainder of the books cover what Searl calls the Law of the Squares which
|
|||
|
Searl claims are necessary to produce anti-grav and free energy (and we
|
|||
|
suspect other effects) if properly applied. I am providing the address if
|
|||
|
you'd like to order the book or the entire set.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
During a conference, the greatest pleasure and sources of information usually
|
|||
|
arise from private or 'after-hours' discussions. During one of these, a
|
|||
|
friend and I were discussing Searl and some of the intriguing phenomena
|
|||
|
associated with his claims. This friend asked if I'd ever heard of a fellow
|
|||
|
named HUMMEL.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I said no and he hesitated, then told me about this fellow up in Canada who
|
|||
|
had come up with his own 'poor man's' Searl disk using magnets that were
|
|||
|
essentially off-the-shelf. This fellow would provide me with no details as to
|
|||
|
the construction of the device but did relate an interesting story regarding
|
|||
|
some of the original experiments with the Hummel design.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He said that the magnets were attached to radial spokes or arms that were
|
|||
|
jointed. These magnets floated in a magnetic housing which gave it the least
|
|||
|
resistance to air or friction. When the inventor built one of his early
|
|||
|
models, he was working in a backroom of his house. He got the machine
|
|||
|
finished about 2AM and gave it a slight spin to make sure it would spin
|
|||
|
freely.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Being very tired, he went off to bed. A couple of hours later, he heard this
|
|||
|
tremendous crashing sound. Running to the workroom, he noticed his device was
|
|||
|
missing and there were pieces of plaster and rubble on the floor of the room.
|
|||
|
Looking up, he noticed a hole in the ceiling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The floating magnets, when properly biased, continued to spin, gaining
|
|||
|
momentum and speed with each rotation. Once it reaches a critical velocity,
|
|||
|
the disk achieves the same electrical field compression that Searl reports in
|
|||
|
his many reports of 'lost' disks and ends up taking off. Both the Hummel and
|
|||
|
Searl disks achieve the same tremendous electrostatic buildup on the outside
|
|||
|
rim.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
My friend would provide no further details on how this device was constructed,
|
|||
|
so I was left pondering what he said. In a later conversation with another
|
|||
|
fellow, we swapped some information and I asked if he'd ever heard of this
|
|||
|
mysterious Hummel Disk. He said sure, would you like to see how it works? Of
|
|||
|
course, I jumped at the opportunity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A rough diagram of the layout of the magnets which form the machine was drawn
|
|||
|
and it's operation explained to some degree. I've finally gotten it drawn up
|
|||
|
as HUMMEL.GIF if you'd like to study it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The principle is not only elegant but very efficient as to cost. Where Searl
|
|||
|
requires these special custom made magnets costing upwards of $10,000 EACH,
|
|||
|
the Hummel Levity Disk uses basically off the shelf magnets arranged in a
|
|||
|
certain fashion, as depicted in HUMMEL.GIF. Searl's magnets are composed of
|
|||
|
neodymium and other elements, specially arranged and constructed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As you read the following, please refer to the diagram HUMMEL.GIF for a better
|
|||
|
understanding. I still have some questions about how this thing works because
|
|||
|
not everything was explained to me. Hopefully as others study it, they will
|
|||
|
share their observations and we can all work collectively to figure it out and
|
|||
|
allow duplication.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Imagine a hollow drum or cylinder, with magnets attached to the interior side
|
|||
|
walls and bottom. There are 3 discs composed of a series of magnets mounted
|
|||
|
on flexible sliding arms in a radial configuration. These are arranged in
|
|||
|
such a way that the disc floats on a cushion of magnetic repelling fields.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The 3 disk assemblies are radial arms consisting of 3 magnets, one of which is
|
|||
|
attached on the inside arm tip, one on the middle of the arm and one on the
|
|||
|
outside of the arm. The middle of this arm has a flexible coupling which as
|
|||
|
far as I understand it can be compressed like a sleeve. The coupling allows
|
|||
|
the arm to bend at the middle, yet stays rigid in the horizontal axis to
|
|||
|
prevent the flipping of the magnets, this is necessary to sustain a repulsion.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thus, looking at it from the top down, you would see something looking like a
|
|||
|
bicycle wheel disk, having a series of radial spokes, connected to a central
|
|||
|
hub. There are 3 of these bicycle type disks, all balanced and floating
|
|||
|
in the air because of magnetic repulsion and contained within the confines of
|
|||
|
this drum.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(I can't say for certain that the disks were mounted on a central shaft
|
|||
|
because the disks needed the absolute least friction from any mechanical
|
|||
|
coupling. The blinding velocities were achieved AS A RESULT of no friction.
|
|||
|
Nowadays, using a Meissner field to provide that magnetic repelling chamber
|
|||
|
would be a great improvement and probably be easier to reproduce, however I
|
|||
|
understand this device was built using off-the-shelf magnets!!)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the center of this apparatus and at the top, are two LARGE, high flux
|
|||
|
density magnets, separated by a screw thread (A & B as the Control unit in the
|
|||
|
drawing). When the top magnet is screwed down, it's repulsion field causes
|
|||
|
the lower magnet to push down and tilt sideways. This sideways repulsion then
|
|||
|
creates a repelling field that causes each of the floating arms to push down
|
|||
|
and around. Thus causing rotation and the disks spin.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As far as I can tell, the flexible coupling on each magnet arm allows the
|
|||
|
'burp' from the repulsion field against the top magnets, that would normally
|
|||
|
prevent free rotation, to move out of the way enough to allow the disk to get
|
|||
|
past this point, then it helps to repel on the opposite side when the arm
|
|||
|
moves back to its position. It is possible that the separation of the arms
|
|||
|
(equivalent to phase) would assist this motion. (this was written BEFORE
|
|||
|
Stewart Harris and his TOMI principle!)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Once you start it, the rotation is slow but eventually builds up to tremendous
|
|||
|
speed because of the low-friction from the magnetic suspension. I would
|
|||
|
imagine the device would be quite dangerous at the high rotational velocities
|
|||
|
and so the magnets should be as securely fastened and balanced as possible.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I showed this diagram to John Searl and he just raised his eyebrows, but said
|
|||
|
nothing about it. John Thomas said he was aware of this device but had no
|
|||
|
evidence of it beyond a description sent to him.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I was also told that the disk acts EXACTLY the same as Searls', that is, as
|
|||
|
the velocity increases, it reaches a point where a tremendous electrical field
|
|||
|
is generated and only then does it take off and lose itself in the atmosphere.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The apparatus was mounted in an aluminum shell similar to a flying saucer
|
|||
|
shape to allow accumulation of the electrical energy on the outside surface.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
When it was started from a takeoff position close to the earth, it would
|
|||
|
attempt to lift off the ground. Instead, lightning bolts would jump from the
|
|||
|
ship, grounding the craft to the earth due to the sapping of energy. Each
|
|||
|
time this happens, the energy would have to re-accumulate. Eventually, they
|
|||
|
learned how to overcome this to provide a sustained ascension.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Hummel found that by using an insulated takeoff platform approximately 6 feet
|
|||
|
from the ground, he could completely prevent these lightning discharges from
|
|||
|
happening and got to a point where ascension and descension could be
|
|||
|
controlled in increments of one inch (so I was told).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To prevent the craft from becoming lost, the control magnets that were
|
|||
|
attached to the screw thread to cause the downward repulsion, tilt and
|
|||
|
subsequent rotation, were controlled by an attached barometer. When the craft
|
|||
|
reached a certain reduced air pressure, it was expected to be too high up and
|
|||
|
possibly still rising.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In order to prevent the craft from becoming lost in space as did so many of
|
|||
|
Searls, the reduced barometric pressure would cause the screw to spin up,
|
|||
|
thereby reducing the control magnet repulsion force, thus slowing down the
|
|||
|
spin and allowing the ship to come in for a controlled landing. This at least
|
|||
|
kept the ship from becoming lost and I assume they were visually tracked to
|
|||
|
allow retrieval. (So if you find one of these things, send it to us here at
|
|||
|
KeelyNet so we can study it!).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Searl says he could never figure out how to control his craft and prevent them
|
|||
|
from taking off like this, until one day at a demonstration, he noticed the
|
|||
|
SPIN of the craft SLOWED DOWN when a video camera was aimed at the ship. It
|
|||
|
turned out that a scanning frequency emitted by the camera somehow interferred
|
|||
|
with the rotation or energy accumulation, possibly from resonant coupling with
|
|||
|
the material in Searls' compound magnets to cause them to reduce their spin
|
|||
|
velocity. After this fortunate observation, Searl says he could now control
|
|||
|
the spin velocity with a remote control circuit.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are several intriguing phenomena associated with Searl's disks, one of
|
|||
|
which is a vacuum that develops in the center of the spinning disk. There is
|
|||
|
also what appears to be an inertia-free field which also occurs in this
|
|||
|
central section.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Searl's SEG (Space Energy Generator) uses this same principle except that it
|
|||
|
is used as a generator. The machine is prevented from reaching the critical
|
|||
|
velocity that produces lift by use of a 'governor', either mechanical or
|
|||
|
electronic, I have never seen details on how it was done. If rotating a metal
|
|||
|
mass causes electrons to be thrown to an outside receptive accumulator rim (as
|
|||
|
Searl claims), then those very high density electrostatic energies could be
|
|||
|
tapped directly (like a Wimshurst such as used in the Testatika and HYDE
|
|||
|
machines) OR the spin could be used to drive another generator.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We will have more details on such devices and technologies as they are
|
|||
|
collected and typed up for distribution and study. Such information should
|
|||
|
not be held secret unless there are business or proprietary reasons. As far
|
|||
|
as I am aware, such is not the case with the Hummel device.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After getting the details of this device, I again met the fellow who first
|
|||
|
mentioned this and showed him the diagram. He became very agitated and wanted
|
|||
|
to know WHO had showed me this and what I intended to do with it. He was not
|
|||
|
informed of my source but of course, it needed to be put online for those who
|
|||
|
study such matters. Almost like someone was sworn to secrecy or something.
|
|||
|
No further information was provided at that time nor has anything specifically
|
|||
|
about Hummel been learned since, although I have spoken with many people about
|
|||
|
it and no one has admitted to knowing anything about the man or the device.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The entire project is kept extremely secret and only by invitation is anyone
|
|||
|
allowed to see a live demonstration or become aware of the technology. Hummel
|
|||
|
is supposed to live in Canada where he carries out his experiments in relative
|
|||
|
privacy.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Those who study UFOs will note the claims of some kind of experimental base in
|
|||
|
Canada, believed to be related to French absorption and continued research
|
|||
|
into the Nazi Kugelblitz technology from World War 2.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If Hummel is the actual source of these mystery sightings, we might be all
|
|||
|
that much closer to nailing down some of these spook technologies to practical
|
|||
|
experiments as this file and most KeelyNet files are intended to promote.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, this is an important piece of information that everyone who studies
|
|||
|
alternative flight or power principles needs to know about. I am sure there
|
|||
|
are more details out there that we hope will also be openly shared once this
|
|||
|
gets distributed to our various Associates.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I have since learned there is a video and/or computer program that shows how
|
|||
|
this machine is constructed and operates, I know the person who has the
|
|||
|
computer animation, but he won't talk and was upset that any of this was about
|
|||
|
to 'hit the pavement'. There are still private demonstrations of this machine
|
|||
|
that are periodically held in Canada to attract financial backers and support.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I will persist in trying to get the animation and any other details on the
|
|||
|
Hummel Disc if at all possible. If you try building this device or any
|
|||
|
modification of it, we would appreciate the sharing of your experiences with
|
|||
|
all of us here at KeelyNet.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The fact that the machine can not only be used to produce electrical flight
|
|||
|
but also as an energy generator system makes it important that everyone study,
|
|||
|
correlate and experiment with these principles. We should do whatever we can
|
|||
|
to make this a reality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As you will see by studying the TOMI information, a positive thrust CAN be
|
|||
|
produced which could easily explain the self propelling attributes of the
|
|||
|
Hummel and Searl machines. Just keep in mind that the extremely high
|
|||
|
velocities needed to funnel the electrons to the outside rim, will require a
|
|||
|
balanced arm assembly for safety.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There has been other information gathered, one in particular from a Russian
|
|||
|
source which is being compiled into a file that might help in research in this
|
|||
|
area. It indicates experiments showing the earth as being POSITIVE instead of
|
|||
|
negative in polarity, which, if true, will change much of our understanding of
|
|||
|
how terrestrial and atmospheric electrical energy operates.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Be careful, think before you build, ask for advice from others, collect
|
|||
|
whatever other information might be helpful and share your findings.
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
The other books are listed in a file on KeelyNet called SEARL.ZIP.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Antigravity: The Dream Made Reality by John Thomas........ $25.00
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SHIPPING AND HANDLING:
|
|||
|
Book/Surface Rates
|
|||
|
LOCATION FIRST ITEM EACH ITEM ADDITIONAL
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
United States................$3.00.................$1.00
|
|||
|
Canada/Mexico................$4.00.................$1.50
|
|||
|
All other Countries..........$7.25.................$2.50
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1st Class/Priority/Air Rates
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
United States............$5.00.....$2.00
|
|||
|
Canada/Mexico............$5.50.....$2.50
|
|||
|
All other Countries Call or write for postage cost
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
New York residents add 8% sales tax.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Make all checks payable to.....John A. Thomas Jr.
|
|||
|
373 Rock Beach Rd.
|
|||
|
Rochester, New York
|
|||
|
14617-1316
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|