186 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
186 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|||
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|||
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|||
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|||
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|||
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|||
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
May 21, 1993
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
CLARK.ASC
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
SOFT PARTICLE PHYSICS:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
THE ERRONEOUS BASIC ASSUMPTION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
by Richard L. Clark, Ph.D. 10 September, 1982
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The basic assumption of General Relativity (and the title of chapter
|
|||
|
|
20 of Einstein's book, Relativity) is:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
"The Equality of Inertial and Gravitational Mass as an
|
|||
|
|
Argument for the General Postulate of Relativity."
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The assumption is that gravitational mass and inertial mass are
|
|||
|
|
equivalent. Since the defined word "Mass" appears in both sides of
|
|||
|
|
this supposed equivalence, this brief paper will not digress into
|
|||
|
|
the misuses of the term mass in current physics. The important
|
|||
|
|
point is that inertia and gravity are neither equal nor derived from
|
|||
|
|
common functionings of the Universe.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In fact, in the extreme limiting cases, gravity can approach zero
|
|||
|
|
while inertia approaches infinity and, obviously, vise versa. Since
|
|||
|
|
gravity and inertia have nothing in common, the claimed equivalence
|
|||
|
|
is an absurdity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The real origins and functioning of gravity and inertia are covered
|
|||
|
|
in the book "Awesome Life Force" by Joseph Cater (1), which
|
|||
|
|
describes a principle known as Soft Particle Physics.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gravity is the result of highly penetrating electromagnetic
|
|||
|
|
radiations entering a mass. These gravity producing electromagnetic
|
|||
|
|
radiations, have a frequency of approximately 1 trillion cps, (1
|
|||
|
|
terahertz) or just below the infrared portion of the standard
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetic spectrum. In the absence of these gravitational
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetic radiations, a mass has no gravity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gravity radiation effects were accidentally discovered in Poland in
|
|||
|
|
1927, (Kowsky & Frost), taken over by the Germans in World War II,
|
|||
|
|
liberated by the British and Canadians, and found out by the United
|
|||
|
|
States in the 1950s.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Inertia is the functioning of a mass's electrostatic field to oppose
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
change. When change is introduced into, or exists within a mass,
|
|||
|
|
the electrostatic charges on the atom or the atomic aggregates,
|
|||
|
|
transform part of their electrostatic fields to magnetic fields.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This functioning is the phenomenon and concept we call inertia, the
|
|||
|
|
third factor in the electrostatic field and magnetic field
|
|||
|
|
relationship.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In the ancient wisdom of the Great Mother system of knowledge, which
|
|||
|
|
is Physics and the universal realities and NOT religion, this
|
|||
|
|
subject was well known.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The "One" became "Two" which generated the "Third", from which all
|
|||
|
|
manifestations originate. The electrostatic field is the One; it
|
|||
|
|
becomes Two with movement or velocity on a charged particle to form
|
|||
|
|
a magnetic field, which generates the Third, or inertia factor.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If the law of the conservation of total system energy is true, the
|
|||
|
|
magnetic field increases directly as the electrostatic field
|
|||
|
|
decreases. The potential energy (electrostatic field) transforms
|
|||
|
|
into kinetic energy (magnetic field) of a moving charge.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The inertia of a body IS this transforming function's ABILITY, or to
|
|||
|
|
put it another way, how much of the electrostatic potential field
|
|||
|
|
BECOMES the magnetic kinetic field when a body is given movement
|
|||
|
|
(velocity). Since total energy of the system is constant, whatever
|
|||
|
|
the electrostatic charge is originally, limits the maximum inertia
|
|||
|
|
of a body. All atoms and molecules have a charge; even the supposed
|
|||
|
|
"uncharged" atoms and molecules have a net positive charge in
|
|||
|
|
reality.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
To paraphrase Cater on a generalized form of this law, we can
|
|||
|
|
generalize Faraday's Law of Induced electromotive force to grasp
|
|||
|
|
this reality: "The induced force produced by a change in velocity
|
|||
|
|
is always in such direction as to oppose any change in this
|
|||
|
|
velocity." This is another exact definition of inertia. The
|
|||
|
|
substitution of velocity for magnetic flux in Faraday's Law, to
|
|||
|
|
generalize it, is valid because both are of the same set class in
|
|||
|
|
reality. For magnetic flux CAN ONLY EXIST with velocity of body,
|
|||
|
|
particle, atom, etc., TRANSFORMED FROM the electrostatic field.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(From the above brief explanation of what inertia really is, it
|
|||
|
|
appears that the engineered control of it is possible. If possible,
|
|||
|
|
inertia engineering may stop or at least decrease, the
|
|||
|
|
transformation of the electrostatic field to the magnetic field,
|
|||
|
|
since inertia is the result of this transformation.)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It appears gravity and inertia have no real relationship whatsoever
|
|||
|
|
to each other. If this is correct, the famous equivalence is a
|
|||
|
|
fiction. INERTIA is an INTERNAL energy system phenomenon and
|
|||
|
|
GRAVITY is an EXTERNAL energy system phenomenon.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
How much more different can they be? The fact that the weight of a
|
|||
|
|
body is directly proportional to its inertial properties and that
|
|||
|
|
proportion is always constant, does not alter the above analysis.
|
|||
|
|
For weight is a gravity function system, or external energy
|
|||
|
|
absorption limiting constraint, which varies with each type of mass,
|
|||
|
|
thus hardly usable as Relativity has used it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Let us briefly review the "proofs" or "experimental confirmations"
|
|||
|
|
of General Relativity. The three most famous "proofs" should be
|
|||
|
|
enough;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1) The perihelion of Mercury,
|
|||
|
|
2) the deflection of light by a gravitational field,
|
|||
|
|
3) and the displacement of spectral lines toward red.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The motion in the perihelion of Mercury is so small that any error
|
|||
|
|
could exist. There exists raw data which denies the supposed
|
|||
|
|
deflection of light in a gravitational field. In the May 1959 issue
|
|||
|
|
of Scientific American, pages 152 and 153, is a diagram of General
|
|||
|
|
Relativity's predicted position of stars and the actual observed
|
|||
|
|
position of stars during the 1952 total eclipse. At least one third
|
|||
|
|
of the stars are displaced in the wrong direction between prediction
|
|||
|
|
and actual position. Another one third make the right direction but
|
|||
|
|
are not even near on position, predicted to actual. This is proof?
|
|||
|
|
So much for curved space and warps, etc., and odd geometries.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The displacement of spectral lines toward the red is the poorest
|
|||
|
|
proof of the three. Here we have the "Big Bang" and other not so
|
|||
|
|
famous theories tied into the plot. This apparent Doppler effect,
|
|||
|
|
the shift toward red, is not proof of an opening stellar velocity
|
|||
|
|
phenomenon at all. The apparent Doppler effect, or red shift, is
|
|||
|
|
common to all light and is part of the Law of Redistribution of
|
|||
|
|
Energy. When light interacts with matter, new light results with a
|
|||
|
|
lower average frequency than the original light, a shift to red.
|
|||
|
|
This can be demonstrated by taking a beam of light in the blue or
|
|||
|
|
violet end of the visible spectrum and pass it through a fairly long
|
|||
|
|
series of light filters. The light filters can be ANY type, all
|
|||
|
|
blue, red, violet or combinations. The light WILL ALWAYS emerge
|
|||
|
|
from the last filter as RED light, if enough filters are passed
|
|||
|
|
through in the test. In open space the star light traveling to
|
|||
|
|
Earth has ENDLESS matter interactions, and thus, frequency drop, the
|
|||
|
|
shift toward red.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
From the above it appears that the Theory of General Relativity,
|
|||
|
|
obscures rather than reveals reality.
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
(1) Awesome Life Force, by Joseph Cater. May be obtained
|
|||
|
|
from Cadake Industries, PO Box 99, Long Creek, South
|
|||
|
|
Carolina 29658.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(Richard L. Clark, 4015 Crown Point Drive, P3, San
|
|||
|
|
Deigo, California 92109.)
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|||
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|||
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|||
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|||
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|||
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 3
|