248 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 30, 1993
NEWMAN4.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following document relates the early form of the
Energy Machine of Joseph Newman.
Contributed by George W. Dahlberg P.E.
__________________________________________________________________
7-15-85
1204 Circle High Drive
Burnsville, Mn. 55337
A Description of the Newman Motor
by Roger Hastings, Ph.D.
This document is intended to provide information regarding the
energy device invented by Mr. Joseph Newman of Lucedale,
Mississippi. I have prepared the material in response to numerous
requests for information. The number of these requests has
increased dramatically since Newman's public demonstration of his
motor at Washington, D.C., in May, 1985. This paper provides a
personal history to date of my involvement with Newman, presents
data which was taken at the Washington demonstration, provides an
analysis of the data, and presents my current thoughts regarding
a mathmatical description of Newman's motor.
HISTORY
I first met Mr. Newman in September, 1981. Newman is an inventor,
and he had travelled to Minnesota to present a toy invention to
Tonka Toys Corp. My brother, John, was at the time in charge of
new products for Tonka, and he interviewed Newman. John and Joe
wound up discussing their respective theories of matter and
energy, and Joe's motor. At that time, Joe was looking for people
to verify the operation of his motor for the patent office. He
invited John to Lucedale, but John said that his brother (me) had
a Ph.D. in physics, and therefore better credentials to offer for
the testing of a motor.
My first reaction to the news of Newman's energy producing motor
was quite negative. I had been a professor for four years, and
had encountered several people with "world saving" energy devices
which they wanted evaluated by the University. In all cases such
devices had proven to be inoperative as net energy producers.
Newman offered to fly me to Lucedale to test his motor, and I
responded that he would be wasting his money and our time because
I would certainly prove him wrong. He insisted, and I complied.
The motor that I saw on that first visit was a monument to Rube
Page 1
Goldberg, and to an incredible personal effort at building such a
large device. It consisted of five thousand pounds of #5 gauge
wire wound as a solenoid. Within the solenoid, a 600 pound
ceramic magnet rotated on questionable bearings. The bearings
were mounted in a wooden structure. On the shaft of the rotor was
a mechanical commutator consisting of three home made wheels, and
brushes whose tension was adjusted with rubber bands. The
commutator received its power from a bank of six volt lantern
batteries. As the huge magnet rotated, the whole structure
creaked and groaned. At that time, Newman was taking energy
output from a secondary coil wrapped around the motor primary
solenoid. I measured the voltage and current input simultaneously
on an oscilloscope. The output load was a resistor, and I
similarly measured the output voltage and current. Multiplying
voltage and current to find power, I determined that the motor
was about 90% efficient.
Newman claimed that his motor was not performing up to par on
that day, and said that he would ask me back when he had the
device tuned up properly. Although I had proven that the motor at
that time was not producing a net energy gain, several aspects of
Newman and his motor were fascinating. First, the motor was not
designed efficiently. Large mechanical losses were evident, and a
90% efficiency seemed highly unusual. Second, the huge magnet was
rotating at some 60 RPM with an input power of only a few watts.
Finally, Newman himself, while unconventional, seemed highly
intelligent, definately a creative thinker, and intensely
dedicated to his scientific work. He informed me that he had
evolved his theory and filed for a patent before he had built a
prototype motor. (I will discuss his theory later.)
I travelled again to Lucedale and indeed Newman had tuned up his
motor. From that point foreward I consistantly measured
efficiencies in excess of 100%. At this point I began an effort
to attract scientific interest in Newman's motor, and to aid him
in obtaining a patent. I wrote several affidavits and documents
describing my measurements and generally supporting Newman's
efforts. I have spent countless hours of my spare time over the
past four years on this effort, withour renumeration. It takes
little immagination to understand the benefit to the human race
which would result from an economical device which generates
energy with no external input. In my opinion, Newman's motor has
performed well enough that the scientific community should be
showing great interest.
Over the years, a number of generic questions have repeatedly
been asked. Is there a hidden energy source? The device can be
viewed from all sides, and there are no external connections. The
motor has been transported across country, and works equally well
at all locations. The motor has been duplicated by at least one
other person, who claims that it works. Newman would not be
acting in his own self interest to simultaneously invite
publicity and commit fraud. It is generally known that Newman is
sincere and honest.
Why isn't the motor running itself without the need for
batteries? While in concept the motor should be capable of
running itself without batteries, the technological problems have
not been solved which would allow such operation. In a sense,
Page 2
however, the motor does run itself. The motor has shown the
capacity to charge up the batteries which provide voltage to the
motor. Tests have been run in which up to 15 amp-hours of output
have been drawn from the motor, and in which the six volt lantern
batteries powering the motor have shown no evidence of an energy
loss (the battery condition was verified in the labs of Ray-O-Vac
Battery Co.). Tests have been run in which apparently dead
batteries have been connected to the motor. The motor has charged
up these batteries to the point where they can power other
devices. The same batteries can be drained down (e.g. through a
resistor), then be re-connected to the Newman motor and be
charged up while they run the motor.
Why isn't Newman's motor powering a home or auto? In my opinion
such a demonstration would convince all skeptics, and create a
great demand for the motor. Newman has proceeded in this
direction. He has built at least four prototype motors to study
the effect of varying motor parameters. He has steadily improved
upon his large prototype, and has succeded in generating up to
about 200 watts of power. By contrast, an average home requires
one to three thousand watts on the average, with peak demands of
up to 20 thousand watts. In this regard, it would be extremely
helpful for establishments with high tech capabilities to aid Joe
in scaling up the motor output. His approach has been to reduce
the physical size of the motor to make it economical, and the
output power. His greatest technical problem has been high
voltage switching.
Why does Newman keep his technical process a secret? This
question was answered at Washington in May, when Newman revealed
the construction details of his motor to the public. He has
published a book ("The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman",
available from Newman Publishing, Rt. 1, Box 52, Lucedale
Mississippi 39452), in which he describes his theory and his
motor. Joe had kept the process secret to avoid patent
infringement. Although his patent is still pending in the U.S.,
it has issued in other countries. Presumably his patent rights
will be protected in the U.S., although it should be noted that
his motor is being copied by others, so that issuance of his
patent in the U.S. is of immediate importance. Garland Robinnett
of CBS news in New Orleans has run a number of reports on
Newman's struggle with the U.S. Patent office.
I do not fully understand why the scientific community in this
country has not shown more interest in Newman's motor. He has had
support from about 30 independent scientists and engineers, most
of whom own their own engineering or consulting firms. He has
also received some financial support from investors, who
represent a range of interests, including oil and electrical
power interests. I know of no one who has observed Newman's motor
and taken measurements who has been able to show that his claims
are invalid. On the contrary, most observers come in as skeptics,
and leave as believers. Over the years my colleagues have
consistantly provided me with arguments questioning the validity
of my measurements. I have responded to these questions by
modifying the measurement proceedures and creating new tests. In
all cases the Newman device has passed the tests to my
satisfaction. In my opinion, Newman has at least discovered some
interesting and unusual new phenomena, and at most has discovered
Page 3
a process which will end man's dependence upon limited and
polluting energy resources.
NEWMAN'S THEORY by Dr. Hastings follows in NEWMAN5.ASC
Compliments of George W. Dahlberg P.E.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4