133 lines
7.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 4, 1993
R_12.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Chipps.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following information about R-12 was taken from 'The Driving
Force' a publication produced by Valvoline Oil and distributed to
ASE certified Master Automobile Technicians. Valvoline nor ASE is
responsible for the "opinion" portion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer 1993 issue
Under pressure from the Clean Air Act to eliminate production and
importation of R-12, DuPont, the worlds largest manufacturer of R-
12, will phase out production by the end of 1994.
At least 65% of 1993 vehicles and nearly every pre-1993 vehicle with
air conditioning requires R-12. 150 MILLION CARS AND LIGHT TRUCKS
USE R-12. THERE IS NO "DROP IN REPLACEMENT" FOR R-12 and IT IS NOT
PROBABLE THAT WE WILL SEE ONE. Unless something is done to relax
the short sighted and arbitrary requirements of the Clean Air Act
you will have to roll your windows down when your air-conditioner
needs service.
Auto makers are working on recommendations to convert SOME of the
late model cars. To convert to the new R-134 will require replacing
several major components, hoses, flushing with R-12 (of which there
won't be any!) and replacement of O-ring seals.
Your air-conditioner system is also more likely to leak due to the
smaller molecular structure of R-134. Cost estimate by industry
experts: $800.00 You know how often estimates by "experts" are
accurate. Cost of R-12 has already quadrupled but R-134 is still
several times more costly.
There are as many studies that show NO link between the Ozone layer
and use of clorofluorocarbons as there are that suggest such a
connection. While the Clean Air Act has a noble title and lofty
ambitions, it is yet another in a series of poorly thought out, knee
jerk reaction, short sighted and "We'll all have to give a little"
STUPID pieces of legislation.
Of course the folks that made the law won't mind because they also
give themselves enough raises to be able to buy new cars and so
won't be affected. The average age of a car in the US is between 7
and 10 years. These vehicles will either not be eligible for
conversion or it will not be economically feasible to do so.
Page 1
You may safely expect a similar fate for the R-22 that is in your
home air-conditioning system and your refrigerator and your freezer,
etc.
------
Write your legislators NOW. They don't always listen when they
should but if the owners of 150 Million cars write, WE WILL BE
HEARD!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
source - STONEHENGE BBS [415] 479-8328
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
This interesting file confirms what we had heard many years ago.
That the ecological "damage" allegedly caused by freon and other
CFC's is in fact a contrived event to precipitate the FORCED USE
of a much more costly "solution".
This was pointed out a few years back in the file FUZZY1.ASC on
KeelyNet. A major study was done by the Japanese which found the
greatest SINGLE pollutant was jet fuel. The emission from just
one jet in a day's worth of travel was more than all the wasted
CFC's of the entire world for an entire month. And think how
many jets are in the air daily and on a worldwide basis.
Think how it would affect commerce and travel should this be
brought to the major publics' attention or steps taken to reduce
jet travel?
The main problem with such "events" is that insufficient numbers
of people come forth in an organized way to FORCE change. Rather,
we just grumble, talk amongst ourselves and put up with it. I
was kind of hoping that Perot might be a major catalyst with many
of his group actually taking action from an organized standpoint,
but it seems that movement has been considerably short-circuited
by personality and a lack of cooperative-directed teamwork.
We have had discussions with many other KeelyNetters as well as
other contacts and friends who percieve a degree of directed
manipulation from either the government or other - at present -
unidentified sources. Many of us believe the purpose of these
manipulations is to collect data which is being used to fine tune
equations that will eventually be used in computer programs and
be able to predict the behavior of large and/or targeted groups
of people. These in turn will be used for at present unknown end
goals. AT PRESENT, we can do little to halt these actions.
Our best bet is to keep on sharing information and building
experiments that might lead to the free release of free energy,
anti-grav or health related technologies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2