331 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
331 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
|
PO BOX 1031
|
||
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
July 5, 1990
|
||
|
|
||
|
Space Vision Anomalies
|
||
|
A Review of the Literature
|
||
|
by
|
||
|
LAMBERT T. PARKER
|
||
|
courtesy of Double Helix BBS at 212-865-7043
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ocular & Visual changes in space.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Before we begin talking about the odd effects of space on vision,
|
||
|
we need to agree on some definitions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
VISUAL THRESHOLD: the minimum amount of light that elicits a
|
||
|
sensation of light.
|
||
|
|
||
|
VISUAL ACUITY : the degree to which the details and contours
|
||
|
of objects are perceived.
|
||
|
Visual acuity is usually defined in terms of
|
||
|
minimum resolvable separation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Threshold is a complex phenomenon, depending heavily on conditions
|
||
|
within the eye and in the surrounding environment. Conditions such
|
||
|
as optical factors, the state of the image forming mechanisms of the
|
||
|
eye;retinal factors, such as the state of the cones; stimulus factors
|
||
|
such as illumination, brightness of the stimulus, contrast between the
|
||
|
stimulus and the background, length of time exposed to the stimulus,
|
||
|
and so on; and other, random factors.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Minimum separation is the shortest distance by which two lines can
|
||
|
be separated and still be perceived as two lines. People with sharp
|
||
|
vision can resolve lines which are very close together. People with
|
||
|
less sharp vision must either move closer to the target (increasing the
|
||
|
apparent separation), or move the lines farther apart (increasing the
|
||
|
actual separation).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Taken together, these two measures are reasonably accurate
|
||
|
measures of the overall state of a persons vision. It is said eyes are
|
||
|
the windows into man's soul. The importance of the organs of sight
|
||
|
cannot be over-emphasized. The visual system, eyes and brain, are a
|
||
|
navigation system which can measure distance through stereoscopic
|
||
|
vision, detect motion, focus from the tip of the nose to infinity,
|
||
|
recognize a multitude of colors, shades and shadows, adapt to a wide
|
||
|
range of lighting conditions, coordinate an average 70 kg male/female
|
||
|
in motion as complex as a ballet or as exacting as threading a needle.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It operates through a zillion neural interfaces in a system
|
||
|
thousands of times more powerful than the most advanced computer, and
|
||
|
does it all without any conscious thought at all. You simply decide
|
||
|
that you want to do thus and so, and it is done.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
For all its amazing versatility, vision is a specialized system.
|
||
|
Human visual hardware is a result of a billion years of evolution
|
||
|
within the earths atmosphere where light is scattered by molecules of
|
||
|
air, moisture, and particulate matter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But as we ascend into our atmosphere light distribution is
|
||
|
changed, due to the decreasing density of the air. The visual system
|
||
|
receives information differently. Sometimes this can result in odd,
|
||
|
even astounding, visual effects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Gemini 4 astronaut Edward White reported seeing networks of roads
|
||
|
during his space walk, and so did cosmonaut Nikolayev from Vostok 3 as
|
||
|
early as 1963. "During the day, the earth has a predominantly bluish
|
||
|
cast.....I could detect individual houses and streets in the low
|
||
|
humidity and cloudless areas such as the Himalaya mountain area. I saw
|
||
|
a steam locomotive by seeing the smoke first..... I also saw the wake
|
||
|
of a boat on a large river in the Burma-India area...and a bright
|
||
|
orange light from the British oil refinery to the south of the city
|
||
|
(Perth,Australia.)"
|
||
|
|
||
|
The above observation was made by Gordon Cooper in Faith 7 [1963]
|
||
|
and it generated much skepticism in the light of the thesis by Muckler
|
||
|
and Narvan "Visual Surveillance and Reconnaissance from Space Vehicles"
|
||
|
in which they determined that a visual angle of ten minutes was the
|
||
|
operational minimum possible for humans, and that the minimum
|
||
|
resolvable object length [M.R.O.L] at an altitude of 113 miles would be
|
||
|
1730 ft.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This limitation of acuity was revised the next year to 0.5 seconds
|
||
|
of arc for an extended contrasting line and 15 seconds of arc for
|
||
|
minimum separation of two points sharply contrasting with the
|
||
|
background.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So how could these astronauts "see" objects much smaller than
|
||
|
this? The answer is that the eye isn't the entire visual system.
|
||
|
There is a mind intimately connected with the eye, and the mind is
|
||
|
capable of inferring details where none can be seen. Orbiting at 237
|
||
|
miles in Skylab it was possible to see the entire east coast [Canada to
|
||
|
the Florida Keys] and resolve details of a 500 feet long bridge based
|
||
|
on inference.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Of interest is the fact that even though a mechanical eye [camera
|
||
|
system] can resolve objects greater than fifty times better than the
|
||
|
human eye, without human ability to infer, people, possessing the
|
||
|
ability to infer, can match that performance--or even surpass it. That
|
||
|
leads us to our first conclusion, the first observed difference between
|
||
|
visual performance on earth and visual performance in space: Visual
|
||
|
acuity in space exceeds that of earth norm when objects with linear
|
||
|
extension such as roads, airfields, vessel wakes, etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An ability called by some the "Search Light Effect". This is a
|
||
|
positive factor. In space, vision is sharper than it is on the ground.
|
||
|
The next factor is not so positive. In fact, it can be a grave danger
|
||
|
to anyone working in the space environment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We judge distance by the mechanism of stereoscopic vision. It
|
||
|
works by fusing the twin images impinging on the eyes, combining them
|
||
|
into one image, and producing a sense of distance. This system relies
|
||
|
on reference points. One object overlaps another, or the images
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page 2
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
received in either eye are slightly different.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can demonstrate this to yourself by simply looking into a
|
||
|
mirror. As you look, close one eye. You see one side of your face
|
||
|
slightly more than the other. Now look through the other eye. You see
|
||
|
the other side of your face. Now, with both eyes open, you can see
|
||
|
your face and somewhat of both sides, and along with that visual
|
||
|
impression you have a sense of how far away you are from the image.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The sides of your face, perceived unequally in either eye, are
|
||
|
reference points for distance. In space one has to deal with a poverty
|
||
|
of reference points. For hardware evolved in a reference oriented
|
||
|
paradigm this poses a grave problem, once out of the space craft gazing
|
||
|
outward the eye can only fix on the stars [without even a twinkle]
|
||
|
which for all practical purpose is at infinity.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This induces a state called "Empty field myopia". Empty Field
|
||
|
Myopia is a condition in which the eyes, having nothing in the visual
|
||
|
field upon which to focus, automatically focus at about 9 feet.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An astronaut/cosmonaut experiencing empty field myopia focusing at
|
||
|
9 feet would be unable see objects at a range as close as 100 feet. If
|
||
|
another spacecraft, satellite, meteorite or whatever entered his field
|
||
|
of vision, he or she would not be able to determine either its size or
|
||
|
its distance.
|
||
|
|
||
|
That is our second conclusion: Vision in space is very subject to
|
||
|
a lack of visual reference points, a condition which induces a state of
|
||
|
visual "neutral lock" known as empty field myopia. Is there a
|
||
|
solution? Man does not face any hostile environment in his birthday
|
||
|
suit, the clothing industry and walk-in-closets say it all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In space we will wear our exoskleton just as we wear winter
|
||
|
jackets in winter. We will wear our helmets with visors to maintain
|
||
|
our internal environment, filter out all those nasty rads etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Since empty field myopia is a result of loss of reference points,
|
||
|
why not just build them into the visor itself? Give the eye points of
|
||
|
reference. Create a virtual reality? This line of speculation leads
|
||
|
to amazing concepts.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To learn more about the concept of virtual universe in the helmet
|
||
|
read: Journal: Air & Space, [Smithsonian Publication]
|
||
|
Article: Big Picture by Steven L.Thompson.
|
||
|
illustrated by Dale Glasgow.
|
||
|
|
||
|
About the creation of a virtual universe with new computers and
|
||
|
software in the helmets of F-16 fighter pilots--this is not a
|
||
|
theoretical posibility but a reality. There is another downside to the
|
||
|
performance of human visual systems in space.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One aspect of a adaptation to microgravity [space sickness] is an
|
||
|
increased dependence on visual as opposed to vestibular mechanisms in
|
||
|
the stabilization of the retinal image during head movement.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This phemonemon only underscores the importance of being aware of
|
||
|
our visual ability. This is our third conclusion: Microgravitational
|
||
|
effects on the human visual/orientation system can cause unpleasant or
|
||
|
even debilitating effects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page 3
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
As if that weren't enough, studies done by the Russians on
|
||
|
cosmonauts on effects of perception of colors in space suggests a
|
||
|
reduction in the perception of brightness of all colors. Greatest
|
||
|
degradation seems to occur in purple, azure, and green.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Conclusion number four: Visual perception of color is impaired in
|
||
|
the space environment, with implications for color coded reference
|
||
|
systems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And, finally, there are the light flashes. Not the so-called
|
||
|
fireflies noted in orbital flights by astronauts [shown graphically in
|
||
|
the movie "The Right Stuff"] but lights perceived as faint spots or
|
||
|
flashes seen after dark adaptation in the cabins of the Apollo
|
||
|
missions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These light flashes described as white or colorless have been
|
||
|
classified as three types:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1) Described as "spots" or "starlike" objects 66 % of the time.
|
||
|
Appearing in both eyes simultaneously or one eye at a time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2) Described as "streaks" 25 % of the time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3) Described as "lightning discharge seen behind clouds" 9 % of
|
||
|
the time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is of interest that the very same astronaut who reported them
|
||
|
in the Apollo flights failed to see them in previous Gemini flights.
|
||
|
After the Apollo flights this phenomena was noted by the crew of all
|
||
|
three Skylab missions especially when they crossed the South Atlantic
|
||
|
Anomaly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
W.Zachary Osborne, Ph.D., and Lawrence Pinsky, Ph.D., at the
|
||
|
University of Houston & J.Ver on Bailey at Lyndon B. Johnson Space
|
||
|
Center conducted an investigation of this phenomena and concluded that
|
||
|
it was due to heavy cosmic radiation penetrating the craft.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The fact that the effect was noted only after the eyes were dark
|
||
|
adapted confirmed retinal interaction rather than interaction with
|
||
|
optic nerve.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Which brings us to our last conslusion: Radiational effects and
|
||
|
light flashes, can be a problem to future space travelers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These are not the only effects that we will (literally) see as we
|
||
|
explore and move out into space. They are, however, a significant
|
||
|
divergence from normal human vision, and must be taken into account in
|
||
|
both the planning and execution of future construction workers living
|
||
|
and working in space, and it must be taken into account.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Failure to do so can be costly, both in terms of time lost and
|
||
|
valuable equipment damaged or destroyed. It can also be fatal. To the
|
||
|
construction worker who fails to see a moving object coming toward him.
|
||
|
To the pilot that misjudges an approach, or to anyone in that
|
||
|
environment relying on vision for safety.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page 4
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
These are the effects: Unusual visual acuity
|
||
|
Empty field myopia
|
||
|
Space sickness
|
||
|
Lost color perception
|
||
|
Light flashes
|
||
|
|
||
|
They must be taken into account during the planning and execution of
|
||
|
any space mission. Failure to do so can be costly...or fatal.
|
||
|
|
||
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
|
||
|
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard
|
||
|
Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your
|
||
|
consideration, interest and support.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 484-3189
|
||
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
FINIS
|
||
|
Page 5
|
||
|
|
||
|
|