954 lines
46 KiB
Plaintext
954 lines
46 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
Volume 4, Number 5 2 February 1987
|
|||
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|||
|
| _ |
|
|||
|
| / \ |
|
|||
|
| /|oo \ |
|
|||
|
| - FidoNews - (_| /_) |
|
|||
|
| _`@/_ \ _ |
|
|||
|
| International | | \ \\ |
|
|||
|
| FidoNet Association | (*) | \ )) |
|
|||
|
| Newsletter ______ |__U__| / \// |
|
|||
|
| / FIDO \ _//|| _\ / |
|
|||
|
| (________) (_/(_|(____/ |
|
|||
|
| (jm) |
|
|||
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|||
|
Editor in Chief: Thom Henderson
|
|||
|
Chief Procrastinator Emeritus: Tom Jennings
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FidoNews is the official newsletter of the International FidoNet
|
|||
|
Association, and is published weekly by SEAdog Leader, node 1/1.
|
|||
|
You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
|
|||
|
FidoNews. Article submission standards are contained in the file
|
|||
|
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from node 1/1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright (C) 1987, by the International FidoNet Association.
|
|||
|
All rights reserved. Duplication and/or distribution permitted
|
|||
|
for noncommercial purposes only. For use in other circumstances,
|
|||
|
please contact IFNA.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Table of Contents
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. ARTICLES
|
|||
|
Plans being made for The Official EchoMail Conference List
|
|||
|
Public Digital Radio Service
|
|||
|
2. NOTICES
|
|||
|
The Interrupt Stack
|
|||
|
HELP with MULTILINK vs. FIDO
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 2 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=================================================================
|
|||
|
ARTICLES
|
|||
|
=================================================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SOFTWARE CAREERS ECHO CONFERENCE UPDATE
|
|||
|
(Revised 1-19-87)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A new Echo Conference devoted to discussion of various subjects
|
|||
|
effecting Software Engineers and MIS professionals has been
|
|||
|
started by SuperResume Fido in San Francisco, 125/612,
|
|||
|
415-546-0119. SuperResume is operated by Lee Johnson, the
|
|||
|
owner of LEE JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, a recruiting firm
|
|||
|
specializing in Software Engineering and MIS Professionals
|
|||
|
since 1974. This 12 years of experience seeing candidates
|
|||
|
succeed and fail in their professional careers has provided
|
|||
|
some very interesting incites. What is needed is a national
|
|||
|
forum to discuss these issues and bring together new ideas from
|
|||
|
a wide variety of professionals. THE PROPOSED ECHO CONFERENCE
|
|||
|
DISCUSSION "AREAS HAVE BEEN REDUCED FROM 15 DOWN TO 3
|
|||
|
are as follows:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
JOBSENG ....... Software Engineering Jobs Echo (jobs with
|
|||
|
VENDORS of computer systems)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
JOBSMIS ....... MIS Jobs Echo (jobs with USERS of computer
|
|||
|
systems.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CARDIS ....... Software Careers Discussions Echo.
|
|||
|
(Interview Techniques, Compensation Negotiation,
|
|||
|
Contracting Pros/Cons, Career Plannning, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SuperResume Fido 125/612 will initially function as the "hub"
|
|||
|
for the conference, and will poll participating Fidos.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The file CARECHO.ARC is available for download on the
|
|||
|
SuperResume (tm) Fido (125/625 - 415-546-0119) for those who
|
|||
|
would like to participate in all or some of the above AREAS.
|
|||
|
It contains a copy of this announcement.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In addition to coordinating the SOFTWARE CAREERS ECHO
|
|||
|
CONFERENCE, Lee Johnson is also making available his
|
|||
|
copyrighted SuperResume (tm) QUESTION.BBS file for Fido
|
|||
|
Sysops who wish to run it as the questionnaire feature of their
|
|||
|
Boards. It produces a detailed, accomplishment-oriented
|
|||
|
resume. This is extremely important because a resume is the
|
|||
|
single most important representation of a professional's
|
|||
|
career. Many well qualified candidates never even get to first
|
|||
|
base (the interview) because they were screened-out due to an
|
|||
|
inadequate resume. Nevertheless, most of people only think
|
|||
|
about their resume when they are considering changing jobs. As
|
|||
|
a result, many deficient, flawed, and poorly constructed
|
|||
|
resumes are in circulation today, and many people's growth is
|
|||
|
being held back.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Lee Johnson is also offering Fido Sysops A WAY TO DEFRAY A
|
|||
|
PORTION OF THE EXPENSE OF OPERATING THEIR BOARDS. If a Board
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 3 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
runs the SuperResume Questionnaire and obtains a completed
|
|||
|
SuperResume (or any resume) of a Software Engineering or MIS
|
|||
|
Professional candidate, Lee Johnson will pay a $500.00 US
|
|||
|
finder's fee to the Sysop and $50.00 US to the National FidoNet
|
|||
|
Administrator if LJI successfully places that candidate. If
|
|||
|
the Sysop personally interviews the candidate, and provides a
|
|||
|
written appraisal of the candidate, the finder's fee goes up to
|
|||
|
ten percent (10%) of LJI's gross fee, which sometimes can be
|
|||
|
$15,000, or a $1,500 finder's fee. Detailed interviewing
|
|||
|
forms will be supplied if requested.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you are interested in either participating in the SOFTWARE
|
|||
|
CAREERS ECHO CONFERENCE, or in running the SuperResume (tm)
|
|||
|
Questionnaire (or both!), please contact Lee Johnson at:
|
|||
|
FidoMail 125/612; voiceline: 415-788-6000;
|
|||
|
dataline: 414-546-0119.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 4 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Blake Eiseman
|
|||
|
Genesis OPUS BBS
|
|||
|
Miami, FL Node 135/3
|
|||
|
(305) 895-2998
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ATTENTION ECHOMAIL CONFERENCE
|
|||
|
COORDINATORS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EchoMail has grown to become one of the most diverse, useful,
|
|||
|
and interesting utilities available to Fido SysOps today. You
|
|||
|
all know what it does.. Its ability to allow multiple BBSes to
|
|||
|
share a common discussion board allows SysOps unlimited new
|
|||
|
ideas and prospects.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EchoMail has grown beyond all expectations. Since its creation,
|
|||
|
local and nation conferences have come to life all around the
|
|||
|
world in virtually every net of the Fido Network.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With this unexpected surge of growth, however, comes mass chaos
|
|||
|
and confusion as to the EchoMail conferences that exist. With
|
|||
|
that, I get to the reason for which I have written this article.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I would like to propose "The Official EchoMail Conference List"
|
|||
|
in which would be listed all existing EchoMail conferences, both
|
|||
|
on a local, and national scale. I will process this list, and
|
|||
|
send copies to major nodes, to be downloaded accordingly. This
|
|||
|
list will not be updated on a regular basis, rather whenever
|
|||
|
enough additions or deletions are present to require a new
|
|||
|
version.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In order to make this list a reality, I need the help of all
|
|||
|
EchoMail conference coordinators. Please send a message to
|
|||
|
Genesis OPUS BBS, in the nodelist under 135/3, containing the
|
|||
|
following information:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Conference Name
|
|||
|
- Coordinator's Name
|
|||
|
- All participating Nodes
|
|||
|
(Name and Node #)
|
|||
|
- A brief description of the topic available
|
|||
|
on the conference.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you do not send this message, your conference will not appear
|
|||
|
in the list. It is up to you to get this message in on time.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I cannot predict an accurate date of release, however, look for
|
|||
|
it about 1 month after this article appears in FidoNews.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thank you for your support.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Blake Eiseman
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 5 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
PROPOSAL FOR THE CREATION OF THE PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FILED BY
|
|||
|
Donald L. Stoner, W6TNS
|
|||
|
October 20 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SUMMARY OF PETITION
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This petition is to identify the need for a new class of radio
|
|||
|
service. This radio service is described in the petition as the
|
|||
|
PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The petition shows that creation of the service and the
|
|||
|
allocation of spectrum is in the public interest, convenience and
|
|||
|
necessity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Presently, computer-to-computer communication by the general
|
|||
|
public is confined to the telephone network. Millions of computer
|
|||
|
owners find that it is increasingly expensive to utilize this
|
|||
|
network to satisfy their communication needs.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Establishment of the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE would permit
|
|||
|
the owners of personal computers to communicate by radio. Instead
|
|||
|
of a traditional channelized scheme, the petition describes a
|
|||
|
radio Local Area Network (LAN). The PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE
|
|||
|
permits an infinite number of local area radio networks to be
|
|||
|
interconnected into a national packet radio network.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE would allow computer owners to
|
|||
|
exchange messages, bulletins, computer programs and other
|
|||
|
information by radio, and at no cost.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The petition describes how the Commission could create the PUBLIC
|
|||
|
DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE, which will adequately serve the needs of
|
|||
|
the public for at least the remainder of this century.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
BACKGROUND OF PETITIONER
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I have been a radio amateur (W6TNS) since 1954. A large part of
|
|||
|
my career has been devoted to the field of writing. For an
|
|||
|
extended period, I was the Novice and Technician editor of CQ
|
|||
|
Magazine. I have written hundreds of articles and authored
|
|||
|
several books on the subject of amateur radio and computer
|
|||
|
communications. I was also responsible for the idea which grew to
|
|||
|
become the OSCAR satellite, and I was able to make useful
|
|||
|
contributions to the program during its early stages. I have been
|
|||
|
an educator and taught at Chaffey College in Southern California.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This experience provided an opportunity to observe and study
|
|||
|
personal motivation, goals, effort versus reward, and so on.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
During the 70's I was involved in the manufacturing of Citizens
|
|||
|
Band communications equipment. Thus, I was able to write about CB
|
|||
|
initially and then participate in its "self destruction". The
|
|||
|
experience afforded the opportunity to see what "went wrong" and,
|
|||
|
with hindsight, to realize how to avoid these mistakes in the
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 6 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
future.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In 1983, I made a reply comment to PR Docket No. 83-28. This was
|
|||
|
the controversial "No-Code" document. As part of my reply, I
|
|||
|
proposed "THE CREATION OF A COMPUTER HOBBYIST LICENSE CLASS".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It was (and is) my contention that this license class would have
|
|||
|
brought in literally millions people into amateur radio. However,
|
|||
|
the amateur fraternity decided that no amateur radio licenses
|
|||
|
should be granted, under any circumstances without a Morse code
|
|||
|
examination.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Clearly, the proposal for a "computer radio band" received
|
|||
|
considerable attention on the part of the Commission. In its
|
|||
|
decision relative to Docket 83-28, the Commission left open the
|
|||
|
possibility of a radio service for computer hobbyists. However,
|
|||
|
radio spectrum was not allocated for such a service.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is the purpose of this document to further amplify the need
|
|||
|
for such a service, to make a recommendation on spectrum
|
|||
|
allocation, and to outline technical specifications which will
|
|||
|
ensure the successful introduction and usage of the PUBLIC
|
|||
|
DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The accumulated knowledge of the writer has provided certain
|
|||
|
insights, many of which have contributed to the preparation of
|
|||
|
this document. A careful and serious consideration of my petition
|
|||
|
by the Commission is sincerely appreciated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
THE PETITION
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Why Is A Computer Radio Band Needed? The increasing popularity of
|
|||
|
personal computing is well known. There are presently more than
|
|||
|
18 million of these devices in the hands of the public. Today, a
|
|||
|
computer can be purchased for less than $100. Thus any American,
|
|||
|
rich or poor, can afford to own a personal computer. Many experts
|
|||
|
feel there will be a ten-fold increase in the acquisition of
|
|||
|
computers by the end of this decade.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Commission is aware of the popularity of computers. High
|
|||
|
frequency digital circuits produce radio and television
|
|||
|
interference. The Commission recognized the growth in the
|
|||
|
personal computer market and regulated interference levels before
|
|||
|
an untenable situation occurred.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Commission is also aware of the popularity of computer
|
|||
|
communications via the telephone network. As a result of the
|
|||
|
"Carterphone Decision", there has been an enormous increase in
|
|||
|
type acceptance applications for telephone modem devices.
|
|||
|
According to Creative Strategies International, a Cupertino
|
|||
|
Calif., research firm, the modem market will reach $555 million
|
|||
|
by the end of 1985 and is expected to top $1.5 billion by 1988.
|
|||
|
The bulk of these telephone modem sales are to the owners of
|
|||
|
personal computers. It is presently possible to purchase an FCC
|
|||
|
approved modem for as little as $29.95. If one assumes an average
|
|||
|
price of $100.00, there will be 15 million modems in use by the
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 7 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
end of this decade.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Why do owners of personal computers utilize modems? The desire to
|
|||
|
communicate with others having like interests does not diminish
|
|||
|
with the acquisition of a computer. Computer owners like to play
|
|||
|
interactive games, exchange messages and software, assist others
|
|||
|
having like computers, and so on. This desire to communicate has
|
|||
|
provided the basis for a number of national information utilities
|
|||
|
such as The Source, CompuServe, PlayNet, Delphi and The Shuttle.
|
|||
|
These organizations allow computer owners to interconnect and
|
|||
|
exchange all manner of information via the national telephone
|
|||
|
network. These services are extremely popular. CompuServe, for
|
|||
|
example, claims to have 250,000 members.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The exchange of information between computer owners is not free,
|
|||
|
however. These information utilities charge hourly fees varying
|
|||
|
between $3.00 and $20.00, depending on time of access and the
|
|||
|
data rate.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
More relevant to this discussion is the cost for the transport
|
|||
|
medium, the telephone network. In the previous decade, the cost
|
|||
|
of a computer was relatively high while telephone costs were
|
|||
|
relatively low. In this decade the situation has reversed.
|
|||
|
Telephone companies are beginning to implement charges based on
|
|||
|
time and distance for local calls. Thus the cost to the public
|
|||
|
for computer communications will increase significantly.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Recently, a number of telephone companies attempted to impose a
|
|||
|
surcharge on those using modems. Some modem users have added an
|
|||
|
expensive second telephone line. Without this alternate path, the
|
|||
|
telephone is essentially out-of-service while the user is on-line
|
|||
|
with the computer. Thus the user is unable to receive emergency
|
|||
|
calls. At the slow data rates prevalent on telephone networks,
|
|||
|
these periods can be quite lengthy.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It should be stressed that much of the existing and future
|
|||
|
computer communications could be handled by suitable radio
|
|||
|
devices. Recently there has been a significant increase in the
|
|||
|
interest and use of radio waves to transport computer data. The
|
|||
|
trade press regularly mentions companies trying various
|
|||
|
approaches which avoid the use of telephone lines for data
|
|||
|
communications. The most common activity seems to be the use of
|
|||
|
FM subcarriers for point-to-multipoint networks.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Motorola has been a leader in the area of point-to-point data
|
|||
|
communications. They offer a wireless data system which allows
|
|||
|
portable-computer owners (possessing Motorola cellular-radio
|
|||
|
telephones) to transmit data at speeds up to 1200 baud.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Motorola has also supplied a hand-held terminal for IBM field
|
|||
|
engineers. It allows two-way communication with a central
|
|||
|
transmitter and computer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Finally, Motorola has recently petitioned the Commission to share
|
|||
|
satellite frequencies in the 1.7 gHz. range to create local area
|
|||
|
business radio networks.
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 8 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All of the above products benefit the business community. They
|
|||
|
are designed to make businesses more profitable, productive
|
|||
|
and/or efficient by transmitting computer data via radio.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
None of the products described above are intended to benefit the
|
|||
|
general public. The PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE can make
|
|||
|
personal computers more useful, interesting and/or productive to
|
|||
|
the general public. It is in the public interest, convenience and
|
|||
|
necessity that the public also have access to this precious
|
|||
|
resource called the radio spectrum.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While modem communications will continue to be popular, an
|
|||
|
alternate cost-free communication path should be available to the
|
|||
|
computer public.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document describes such a service, called the PUBLIC DIGITAL
|
|||
|
RADIO SERVICE. It petitions the Commission to create such a
|
|||
|
service with suitable regulations and to allocate sufficient
|
|||
|
spectrum to insure the success of the service.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TYPE OF SERVICE PROPOSED
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the past, there has been some discussion of permitting
|
|||
|
computer communications on the Citizens Band. CB usage and
|
|||
|
channel loading is currently a fraction of what it was during the
|
|||
|
previous decade. Four additional CB frequencies, formerly used
|
|||
|
for the remote control of objects, are virtually unused. Other
|
|||
|
bands (in particular, 49 and 72 mHz) could accommodate computer
|
|||
|
communications.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the above examples, a channel scheme is implied. The use of
|
|||
|
communication channels, however, leads to ham type operations
|
|||
|
("send the data to me on channel X"). Channelized operation and
|
|||
|
shared services would probably not work for the PUBLIC DIGITAL
|
|||
|
RADIO SERVICE. The users of this service will expect operation
|
|||
|
and performance similar to that of a telephone modem. Telephone
|
|||
|
modems do not have channels.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The computer public is not interested in the radio aspects of
|
|||
|
communication other than as a means to an end. Thus there is no
|
|||
|
need or desire for voice communications as part of an equivalent
|
|||
|
radio modem. This precludes the "chit-chat" type of operation
|
|||
|
which was destructive on the Citizens Band.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sharing frequencies with voice communication (such as on CB)
|
|||
|
would be unacceptable. Interference, caused by frequency sharing,
|
|||
|
would garble the received data. Since the interference is
|
|||
|
transparent, the typical user will assume that data errors are
|
|||
|
caused by equipment faults. Thus, it is essential that the
|
|||
|
frequency allocation for the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE not be
|
|||
|
shared with any other service.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Channelized plans inevitably lead to a further problem. If the
|
|||
|
service becomes popular, there will ultimately be a need for more
|
|||
|
channels. This is exactly the situation which occurred on the
|
|||
|
Citizens Band. The Commission is well aware of the problems which
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 9 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
resulted from the disruption of adding additional CB channels.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The alternative to a channelized scheme is to send the data at
|
|||
|
high rates using packet technology. A single wideband channel can
|
|||
|
be thought of as a digital highway with addressed packets
|
|||
|
entering and leaving the route in a highly organized manner (see
|
|||
|
"What Is A Packet Radio Network?").
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
AN ALLOCATION OF SPECTRUM FOR THE PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A wideband digital channel can only be accommodated within the
|
|||
|
VHF band or higher frequencies. To keep the cost of equipment
|
|||
|
low, a band between 30 and 300 mHz is ideal. Some readers may
|
|||
|
feel that a service as described should be placed in the UHF or
|
|||
|
SHF range. This might be true if a suitable allocation within the
|
|||
|
30-300 mHz band did not exist.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
However, within this frequency range there is a band, 2 mHz in
|
|||
|
width, which is virtually unoccupied and therefore unused. I
|
|||
|
refer to the spectrum between 52 and 54 mHz. Radio amateurs are
|
|||
|
permitted to operate on frequencies between 50 and 54 mHz (the
|
|||
|
six meter band). For a number of reasons, this band is
|
|||
|
"underoccupied".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is estimated that out of 400,000 radio amateurs in the United
|
|||
|
States, less than 1,000 are active on the six meter band.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Due to the potential for inteference with adjacent television
|
|||
|
channel 2 (54-60 mHz), virtually all six meter users operate
|
|||
|
between 50 and 52 mHz. For all practical purposes the radio
|
|||
|
spectrum between 52 and 54 mHz is wasted.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The radio spectrum is a precious natural resource much the same
|
|||
|
as our beaches and national parks. The public access to the radio
|
|||
|
spectrum resource is severely limited. The entry fee is an
|
|||
|
amateur radio license. This can be justified in instances where
|
|||
|
the resource is severely limited or where national security is
|
|||
|
involved. It cannot be justified by any stretch of the
|
|||
|
imagination when the beach or park is totally deserted!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
POTENTIAL FOR TV INTERFERENCE
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Cause of Interference- Radio amateurs have not used the 52.0-
|
|||
|
54.0 mHz portion of the six meter band due to the high risk of
|
|||
|
television interference. This interference problem occurs through
|
|||
|
no fault of the amateur or the transmitting equipment.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A typical ham six meter transmitter can induce several volts of
|
|||
|
radio frequency energy in a nearby television antenna. The
|
|||
|
induced voltage can be thousands of times stronger than the
|
|||
|
television station being received. Thus, the strong signal from
|
|||
|
the ham station can overload the TV receiver.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This effect is called crossmodulation and can cause interference
|
|||
|
on all channels. The level of interference can vary in intensity
|
|||
|
from "crosshatching" to a total loss of the picture.
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 10 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Radio amateurs have access to many bands of frequencies
|
|||
|
throughout the radio spectrum. None of the other bands share the
|
|||
|
close proximity to television channels as does the six meter
|
|||
|
band. Clearly, amateurs have resolved the problem of television
|
|||
|
interference simply by not using this portion of the six meter
|
|||
|
band.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To date, no one has addressed the problem of using these
|
|||
|
frequencies in a manner which will not cause television
|
|||
|
interference.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This portion of the spectrum could be utilized by reducing the
|
|||
|
power output of the transmitter below the point where television
|
|||
|
interference can occur.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Eliminating Interference- It is the opinion and experience of the
|
|||
|
writer that no televison interference can occur from a radio
|
|||
|
modem operating in the 52.0- 54.0 mHz band if the following
|
|||
|
conditions are met:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1.zThe signal strength of the TV station being received exceeds
|
|||
|
100 uvolts.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2.zThe effective radiated power of an adjacent radio modem does
|
|||
|
not exceed one watt.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3.zThe separation between the radio modem antenna and the
|
|||
|
television antenna exceeds 8 meters.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4.zThe radio modem antenna is vertically polarized with respect
|
|||
|
to the horizontally polarized TV receiving antenna.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5.zAll modulation and spurious products which fall outside the
|
|||
|
authorized bandwidth conform to the FCC 43 plus 10 log10 rule.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If these conditions are met, the 52.0- 54.0 mHz band will be
|
|||
|
suitable for the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE and no significant
|
|||
|
television interference will occur.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
WHAT IS A PACKET RADIO NETWORK?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The reader may be familiar with the term "local area network"
|
|||
|
(LAN). In this system a limited number of computers are connected
|
|||
|
together by cable in a manner which permits intercommunication. A
|
|||
|
packet radio network is an infinite number of LAN's connected
|
|||
|
together by radio waves.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A packet radio network may be thought of as a digital equivalent
|
|||
|
of the U.S. Postal Service. The information to be sent to another
|
|||
|
computer is equivalent to a letter. The letter is placed in an
|
|||
|
envelope which includes a destination address. This is called the
|
|||
|
packet. This packet is sent along with those of other users into
|
|||
|
the network, which acts like a mailbag.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The packet address also includes something like a postal zip
|
|||
|
code. The postal analogy varies somewhat in the handling of
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 11 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
messages. Each radio modem connected to the network is a
|
|||
|
destination mailbox. At the same time it can also act as a "post
|
|||
|
office" for others connected to the network.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Each user is considered to be a "node" in the PUBLIC DIGITAL
|
|||
|
RADIO SERVICE. These stations or nodes constantly monitor the
|
|||
|
transmissions (mailbags), looking for packets (envelopes) which
|
|||
|
are addressed to them. If a message addressed to the node is
|
|||
|
detected, it is held in memory (the recipients mailbox).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The message may be intended for a nearby node as indicated by the
|
|||
|
"zip code". In this case, the node "mailbox" does not activate.
|
|||
|
Rather, the node becomes a "post office" and passes the message
|
|||
|
to one or more other nodes. The reply from the destination
|
|||
|
computer is handled in the same manner but the direction is
|
|||
|
reversed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Packet radio transmission (movement of the "mailbags") can occur
|
|||
|
at very high speed. In fact, the speed is only limited by the
|
|||
|
bandwidth of frequencies allocated to the network. This petition
|
|||
|
requests a band of frequencies 2 mHz in width. This is sufficient
|
|||
|
to handle data rates in excess of 1 million bits per second. When
|
|||
|
one considers that the typical rate of data transmission on a
|
|||
|
telephone network is 300 bits per second, it can be seen that the
|
|||
|
PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE can handle a large number of
|
|||
|
simultaneous users.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Unlimited Users- Actually, the number of simultaneous users is
|
|||
|
unlimited due to an advantage of FM radio transmission called the
|
|||
|
"capture effect". Each node will "hear" (or capture) only the
|
|||
|
strongest stations in the immediate area of the node. More
|
|||
|
distant stations will be inaudible and will not cause
|
|||
|
interference. Thus users in two adjacent cities (for example) can
|
|||
|
communicate within the cities without interference from users in
|
|||
|
the adjacent city. Of course, if it is desired to send a message
|
|||
|
to a user in the adjacent city, the appropriate nodes will repeat
|
|||
|
the message until it reaches the destination and triggers a
|
|||
|
delivery acknowledgment. Other messages, not addressed to the
|
|||
|
adjacent city, will be ignored.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
WHAT IS A RADIO MODEM?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The device to control the node (see previous section) functions
|
|||
|
similar to a ham radio "digipeater" but at a much higher speed.
|
|||
|
Since the the term "digipeater" has no significance to the
|
|||
|
general public, the node controller is referred to as a "radio
|
|||
|
modem".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
What is it?- Technically speaking, the radio modem is a non-
|
|||
|
persistent, carrier sense, multiple access with collision
|
|||
|
avoidance device. In practice, the radio modem consists of a
|
|||
|
small box, whip antenna and coaxial cable. The unit contains a
|
|||
|
receiver and transmitter, in addition to an RS-232 computer
|
|||
|
interface.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In addition to acting as a transceiving device, the radio modem
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 12 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
is also capable of repeating received packets on the basis of a
|
|||
|
stored algorithm. In other words, it will receive, store and
|
|||
|
retransmit messages along the addressees route. Note that it is
|
|||
|
capable of acting as a repeater even if it is not connected to a
|
|||
|
computing device.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Training- Upon activation, the radio modem executes a stored
|
|||
|
training sequence. When first installed, the radio announces its
|
|||
|
presence and digital address in the network. The radio modem
|
|||
|
transmits its position with respect to other units, determines
|
|||
|
the digital address of other nearby units and finally, adjusts
|
|||
|
its power output to the minimum required to maintain
|
|||
|
communications with the other nearby units. This power can vary
|
|||
|
from 1 milliwatt for densely populated areas to the 1 watt
|
|||
|
maximum in rural areas. It is essential that the radio modem
|
|||
|
transmit only sufficient energy to maintain contact with other
|
|||
|
nearby radio modems (nodes).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Training the radio modem for power output insures that a minimum
|
|||
|
signal level is radiated by the antenna. The purpose is to
|
|||
|
minimize the possibility of television interference. Some readers
|
|||
|
may point out that one watt is simply not enough power for rural
|
|||
|
areas. However, it is not the purpose of the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO
|
|||
|
NETWORK to duplicate the elaborate trunks of the public telephone
|
|||
|
network. There are bound to be areas which cannot pass messages.
|
|||
|
Under no circumstances should consideration be given to increased
|
|||
|
power output in these instances. If a high power mode is
|
|||
|
available, it will be abused.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A COMPARISON WITH CB RADIO
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Those reviewing this petition may have a tendency to make
|
|||
|
comparisons with the introduction, usage and the degeneration of
|
|||
|
the 27 mHz Citizens Radio band.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The following points are presented with this comparison in mind.
|
|||
|
No one, including the petitioner, would like to see the PUBLIC
|
|||
|
DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE meet the same fate as the 27 mHz Citizens
|
|||
|
Band.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There is a major reason for the chaos which developed on the 27
|
|||
|
mHz Citizens Band. The licensees of this service did not feel it
|
|||
|
was in their interests to abide by the Rules and Regulations. We
|
|||
|
can learn from this experience by designing a service where Rule
|
|||
|
compliance is in the interests of the user.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MODULATION- There must be no provision for voice communications
|
|||
|
in the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE. Users of radio modems wish
|
|||
|
to exchange digital data, not the spoken word.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
IDENTIFICATION- Enactment of a PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE will
|
|||
|
not affect the licensing workload of the Commission. Services
|
|||
|
which are essentially self-regulating (such as the remote control
|
|||
|
of objects, garage door openers, etc.) do not require the use of
|
|||
|
call letters. Inherent in the addressability of the radio modem,
|
|||
|
is a built-in aid to compliance and enforcement. Each radio modem
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 13 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
has its own unique identification code, that is, its packet
|
|||
|
address. This is both the serial number and digital address of
|
|||
|
the unit. This code also identifies the manufacturer and the
|
|||
|
physical location of the radio modem. Violations of technical
|
|||
|
requirements can be easily be correlated by manufacturer. In
|
|||
|
other words, if a significant number of units are observed to be
|
|||
|
defective, the manufacturer can be immediately determined by
|
|||
|
serial number correlation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If a unit is found to be non-complying, a message can be
|
|||
|
addressed to that radio modem advising the user of the problem.
|
|||
|
The Commission personnel sending the message receives the
|
|||
|
customary delivery acknowledgment of the message. Thus there can
|
|||
|
be no question that the user received the Notice of Violation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
POWER OUTPUT- A major contributing factor to the "CB problem" was
|
|||
|
the addition of power amplifiers to CB radios in an effort to
|
|||
|
increase the talk range.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Adding a power amplifier to a radio modem will produce no
|
|||
|
increase in performance. The unit will "retrain" to reduce its
|
|||
|
power output to maintain the nominal signal level at nearby radio
|
|||
|
modems. Thus, the power delivered to the antenna might be 50
|
|||
|
milliwatts (as an example), with or without the power amplifier.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ANTENNA- To further increase transmitting range, high gain,
|
|||
|
directional antennas were connected to CB radios. If the same
|
|||
|
type of antenna were connected to a radio modem, it would result
|
|||
|
in a "negative improvement". There would be no increase in range,
|
|||
|
since the radio modem would retrain to produce the nominal signal
|
|||
|
strength at nearby nodes. More important, the radio modem
|
|||
|
connected to a directive antenna could miss messages arriving
|
|||
|
from directions other than the antenna principal gain lobe. By
|
|||
|
the same token, raising the elevation of the antenna would cause
|
|||
|
no noticeable increase in communication range.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OFF FREQUENCY OPERATION- Illegal out-of-band operation caused
|
|||
|
sizable headaches for the Commission enforcement personnel. This
|
|||
|
will never be the case with the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEM
|
|||
|
however. There is only one "channel" or band. If, by some means,
|
|||
|
the frequency of a radio modem were lowered, the data would be
|
|||
|
destroyed by amateur radio transmissions. If it were raised,
|
|||
|
video information from TV channel 2 would do the same thing.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The "radio modem" (node controller) to be used in the PUBLIC
|
|||
|
DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE shall meet the following specifications:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FREQUENCY BAND- Equipment authorized to operate in the PUBLIC
|
|||
|
DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE shall be capable of receiving and
|
|||
|
transmitting data within the band from 52.0 to 53.999 mHz.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MODULATION- The data shall frequency modulate the carrier in a
|
|||
|
frequency shift keyed scheme. Under no circumstances will
|
|||
|
equipment authorized for use in the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 14 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
have provision for voice modulation or detection.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MODULATION AND SPURIOUS PRODUCTS-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The data rate (see Note 1), waveform and signal processing shall
|
|||
|
be such that all products which fall outside the authorized
|
|||
|
bandwidth be suppressed by 43 plus 10 log10 (mean output power,
|
|||
|
in watts) decibels.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
POWER OUTPUT- The power delivered by the final amplifier stage
|
|||
|
into a 72 ohm load shall not exceed 1.0 watts. Further, the radio
|
|||
|
modem (node controller) shall have an initial power-up "training"
|
|||
|
mode. Upon power-up, the power output will be 1 milliwatt.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The power will increase during "training" in 3 db. steps until
|
|||
|
contact is established with nearby radio modems (node
|
|||
|
controllers). This value is stored in memory and becomes the
|
|||
|
nominal power output for the radio modem.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ANTENNA- The antenna shall consist of a vertical radiator which
|
|||
|
does not exceed one-quarter wavelength. The antenna shall exhibit
|
|||
|
no gain or directional characteristics. The antenna shall be
|
|||
|
supplied with a nominal length of coaxial cable.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TRANSMITTER IDENTIFICATION- Each radio modem shall have an
|
|||
|
embedded identification which is transmitted as part of its
|
|||
|
packet address. The address will be used to identify the
|
|||
|
manufacturer, the serial number and the routing code of the
|
|||
|
equipment.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
PACKET CONSTRUCTION- The packet and destination address will be
|
|||
|
contained in the header. The header will be constructed to limit
|
|||
|
the number of destination addresses. This is done to specifically
|
|||
|
preclude the transmission of "junk mail".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
REMUNERATION- Users of the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE shall be
|
|||
|
specifically prohibited from receiving any form of remuneration
|
|||
|
or compensation, either in the form of funds, goods or services,
|
|||
|
for handling data on the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE (see Note
|
|||
|
2).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TYPE ACCEPTANCE- Type acceptance procedures, similar to those for
|
|||
|
Citizens Band equipment, will be required. This insures that
|
|||
|
commercially manufactured equipment used in the PUBLIC DIGITAL
|
|||
|
RADIO SERVICE meets the specified technical requirements for this
|
|||
|
service.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NOTE 1- No data rate is given in these proposed specifications.
|
|||
|
It should be left to industry to determine the data rate.
|
|||
|
Schemes, unknown to the writer or Commission, may permit higher
|
|||
|
rates within the authorized bandwidth than conventional theory
|
|||
|
would dictate.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NOTE 2- The purpose of this provision is to prevent the use of
|
|||
|
the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE for the benefit of common
|
|||
|
carriers.
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 15 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The restriction should not be construed to preclude the use of
|
|||
|
the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE for business applications. For
|
|||
|
example, the radio modem would be extremely useful within
|
|||
|
buildings to avoid the need for local area network cabling. It is
|
|||
|
likely the signals of an office radio LAN would not connect to
|
|||
|
the external PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The reader might envision that the service would be usurped by
|
|||
|
the business community. This is not likely, however, due to the
|
|||
|
self-regulating nature of the PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE.
|
|||
|
Businesses are used to the near instantaneous response of
|
|||
|
telephone data communications.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In comparison, the message response of a packet radio network is
|
|||
|
relatively slow. Only small businesses would find these delays
|
|||
|
tolerable. These are the same business which can least afford the
|
|||
|
increase in telephone rates.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There is an analogy in the use of the Citizens Band. Numerous
|
|||
|
channels are available and the equipment is quite inexpensive.
|
|||
|
Even so, this band is seldom used for business purposes. There
|
|||
|
are simply too many disadvantages for the business community.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CONCLUSION
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In response to this petition, the Commission may point out that
|
|||
|
there has been no popular "groundswell" to create a computer
|
|||
|
radio service. Likewise, there was no public interest in the
|
|||
|
creation of a television service in the 30's. However, in 1932,
|
|||
|
the Commission recognized the significance of television and
|
|||
|
allocated two bands for development of this new technology.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By the same token, the Commission recognized the impact that FM
|
|||
|
radio broadcasting would have on sound reproduction. In 1941 they
|
|||
|
allocated an eight mHz band to bring high fidelity sounds to the
|
|||
|
public.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In either case, there was very little awareness that such
|
|||
|
technologies were possible when the allocations were made.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The creation of a PUBLIC DIGITAL RADIO SERVICE is another
|
|||
|
instance where the Commission could take the initiative and
|
|||
|
create a new service in keeping with current technology.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
International Regulations- Since the allocation is above 50 mHz,
|
|||
|
it appears that no international treaties would be involved in
|
|||
|
making the proposed allocation. Rather, it is likely that other
|
|||
|
countries would develop a similar service for their citizens.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Amateur Radio Opposition- It is safe to assume there will be
|
|||
|
sizable opposition to this petition by amateurs. The writer has
|
|||
|
been a radio amateur for 30 years. During this period, no
|
|||
|
permanent allocation has been "taken away" from the amateur radio
|
|||
|
fraternity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
However, there can be no defense by amateurs of the inactivity on
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 16 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6 meters. A reallocation of the frequencies requested would
|
|||
|
benefit the majority at virtually no expense to the minority.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Amateur Radio Collaboration- The principal purpose of this
|
|||
|
petition is to obtain an allocation for a public computer
|
|||
|
communication band. The writer would not object if this goal
|
|||
|
could be achieved as part of the Radio Amateur Service. The
|
|||
|
computer public would accept an administrative fee in return for
|
|||
|
access to the radio spectrum. However, they would never accept
|
|||
|
any sort of "testing" to achieve this goal.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The writer would like to thank the Commission for the opportunity
|
|||
|
to submit this petition. Further, the writer appreciates the
|
|||
|
consideration this petition will receive by the members of the
|
|||
|
Commission.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Signed 20 October, 1985
|
|||
|
----------------------
|
|||
|
Donald L. Stoner, W6TNS
|
|||
|
6014 E. Mercer Way
|
|||
|
Mercer Island, Wa. 98040
|
|||
|
(206) 232-6968
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 17 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=================================================================
|
|||
|
NOTICES
|
|||
|
=================================================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Interrupt Stack
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
17 May 1987
|
|||
|
Metro-Fire Fido's Second Birthday BlowOut and Floppy Disk
|
|||
|
Throwing Tournament! All Fido Sysops and Families Invited!
|
|||
|
Contact Christopher Baker at 135/14 for more information.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
24 Aug 1989
|
|||
|
Voyager 2 passes Neptune.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you have something which you would like to see on this
|
|||
|
calendar, please send a message to FidoNet node 1/1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
HELP with MULTILINK vs. FIDO Allen Miller 1/104
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The file FIDOMLNK.ARC is available on my system for Seadog file
|
|||
|
requests for any of you that are interested in seeing sample .BAT
|
|||
|
files and configuration notes on running one or two Fido's under
|
|||
|
Multilink Multitasking.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fidonews Page 18 2 Feb 1987
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
__
|
|||
|
The World's First / \
|
|||
|
BBS Network /|oo \
|
|||
|
* FidoNet * (_| /_)
|
|||
|
_`@/_ \ _
|
|||
|
| | \ \\
|
|||
|
| (*) | \ ))
|
|||
|
______ |__U__| / \//
|
|||
|
/ Fido \ _//|| _\ /
|
|||
|
(________) (_/(_|(____/ (jm)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Charter Membership for the International FidoNet Association
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Membership in IFNA is open to any individual or organization that
|
|||
|
pays an annual specified membership fee. IFNA serves the
|
|||
|
international FidoNet-compatible electronic mail community to
|
|||
|
increase worldwide communications.**
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Name _________________________________ Date ________
|
|||
|
Address ______________________________
|
|||
|
City & State _________________________
|
|||
|
Country_______________________________
|
|||
|
Phone (Voice) ________________________
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Net/Node Number ______________________
|
|||
|
Board Name____________________________
|
|||
|
Phone (Data) _________________________
|
|||
|
Baud Rate Supported___________________
|
|||
|
Board Restrictions____________________
|
|||
|
Special Interests_____________________
|
|||
|
______________________________________
|
|||
|
______________________________________
|
|||
|
Is there some area where you would be
|
|||
|
willing to help out in FidoNet?_______
|
|||
|
______________________________________
|
|||
|
______________________________________
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Send your membership form and a check or money order for $25 to:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
International FidoNet Association
|
|||
|
P. O. Box 41143
|
|||
|
St Louis, Missouri 63141, USA
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thank you for your membership! Your participation will help to
|
|||
|
insure the future of FidoNet.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
** Please NOTE that IFNA is a general not-for-profit organization
|
|||
|
in formation and BYLAWS are presently being prepared by an
|
|||
|
International Rules Committee. Membership requirements and fees
|
|||
|
are subject to approval of this Committee. An IFNA Echomail
|
|||
|
Conference has been established on FidoNet to assist the BYLAWS
|
|||
|
Committee. We welcome your input on this Conference.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|