523 lines
31 KiB
Plaintext
523 lines
31 KiB
Plaintext
|
A Broad Look At British And Australian Phreaking
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Anyone interested in amateur radio can go to his local library and find a
|
|||
|
shelf of books telling him how to annoy his neighbours by interfering with
|
|||
|
their television pictures. Unlike such normal hobbies it is not so easy to
|
|||
|
find information on the subject of <20>phone phreaking<6E>. When I first became
|
|||
|
interested in telephones I was more or less on my own and I spent a lot of
|
|||
|
time trying to find other telephone enthusiasts. This was an interesting
|
|||
|
exercise, full of odd surprises. On one occasion I spent a lot of time
|
|||
|
tracking down rumours of one individual who turned out to be no other than
|
|||
|
myself. Some people get interested in telephones simply by meeting
|
|||
|
established <20>phone phreaks. I feel that one misses something by this.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To understand what <20>phone phreaking is all about one needs to know a little
|
|||
|
about telephone systems.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The British telephone system telephone exchanges in the UK are arranged in a
|
|||
|
hierarchical structure based on about 40 zones switching centres, 350 group
|
|||
|
switching centres and about 6,000 minor exchanges. Each group switching
|
|||
|
centre (GSC) is a member of a zone and its zone switching centre is its
|
|||
|
primary route to the trunk network. Similarly, each of the minor exchanges
|
|||
|
has a GSC as its parent. In addition to this basic structure there are
|
|||
|
further circuits, GSC to GSC, minor to minor exchange and so on, provided
|
|||
|
that there is a sufficient demand to justify them.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Until the introduction of Subscriber Trunk Dialling (STD) in 1959, telephone
|
|||
|
operators handled all trunk traffic. By this time most of the network was
|
|||
|
automatic in the sense that one originating operator could complete a call
|
|||
|
by dialling, over the trunk network, codes which routed the call from one
|
|||
|
centre to another.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Following the introduction of STD, the responsibility for the setting up of
|
|||
|
the call was placed upon the subscriber.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now the most costly part of a telephone system is the provision and
|
|||
|
maintenance of circuits between exchanges and this dictates the philosophy
|
|||
|
behind the working of the system. The STD equipment dials calls over the
|
|||
|
trunk network automatically and in this way replaces the local operator. The
|
|||
|
equipment is full of safeguards which ensure that, either by accident or
|
|||
|
misuse, a subscriber does not waste time on trunk circuits. For example, a
|
|||
|
subscriber cannot let a call ring indefinitely: he will be automatically
|
|||
|
disconnected after about 3 or 4 minutes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Most of the automatic switching equipment in the UK is based upon the older
|
|||
|
type of electromechanical switching known as the Strowger (or step by step)
|
|||
|
system. This type of equipment responds directly to the impulses set up as
|
|||
|
one dials. As a result, there is a very close relationship between the codes
|
|||
|
dialled and the way in which the call is routed. If one looks at the
|
|||
|
dialling code booklet issued to subscribers one will find that it is divided
|
|||
|
into two parts. The first gives dialling codes for <20>local<61> calls and the
|
|||
|
main part of the booklet gives the dialling codes for <20>local<61> calls and the
|
|||
|
main part of the booklet gives the dialling codes for trunk calls.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The local codes operate Strowger switching equipment. If one studies the
|
|||
|
local dialling codes published for a few neighbouring exchanges it is
|
|||
|
possible to break them down into their component routings. It is then
|
|||
|
possible to string them together to reach distances of up to about 70 miles.
|
|||
|
It is through discovering this that many people, myself included, first
|
|||
|
became interested in telephones. This stringing together of local codes is
|
|||
|
known as <20>chaining<6E> and is of restricted interest since the lines are
|
|||
|
unamplified and of low quality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The STD codes consist of the digit zero followed by a three digit <20>area
|
|||
|
code<EFBFBD> and, in the case of minor exchanges, further routing digits. The
|
|||
|
initial zero connects a subscriber to the STD routing equipment. The next
|
|||
|
three digits bear no relation to the routing digits actually needed to set
|
|||
|
up the call and are the same all over the country. They were allocated as a
|
|||
|
mnemonic in the days when telephone dials had letters on them.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The heart of the STD equipment is a register translator (RT). This splits
|
|||
|
off the area code and translates it into the appropriate routing digits,
|
|||
|
indeed the same ones that an operator would dial. Meanwhile the remaining
|
|||
|
dialled digits are stored in a register. The equipment first pulses out the
|
|||
|
routing digits got from the translator and follows them with the digits
|
|||
|
stored in the register, these being the final routing digits (for minor
|
|||
|
exchanges) and the called number. Having done this the equipment switches
|
|||
|
through the speech path and the register translator releases itself in
|
|||
|
preparation for the next call, leaving control to a piece of equipment
|
|||
|
called a register access relay set. This piece of control equipment has
|
|||
|
obtained the appropriate metering rate for the call from the translator, and
|
|||
|
when the call is answered it steps the subscriber<65>s meter at this rate.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Trunk Access
|
|||
|
Theoretically, the only way that a subscriber has of obtaining a trunk
|
|||
|
circuit is either via the local operator or through the STD equipment.
|
|||
|
Neither of these two methods allow one to explore the telephone network,
|
|||
|
which is what the <20>phone phreak wants to do. In practice there are other
|
|||
|
ways of gaining access to the trunk network. For a variety of reasons there
|
|||
|
are ways of dialling from the local codes, to which a subscriber has proper
|
|||
|
access, onto trunk routes. One way in which this can happen is that
|
|||
|
occasionally a local route can terminate at a GSC with the same status as an
|
|||
|
incoming trunk route. When this happens one may dial the appropriate local
|
|||
|
code followed by the digit <20>1<EFBFBD> and gain access to the trunk circuits at the
|
|||
|
distant GSC.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Another type of trunk access arises when Post Office engineers within an
|
|||
|
exchange wire up their own irregular circuits. One of these came to light
|
|||
|
last year in Bristol as a result of a Post Office prosecution. One dialled
|
|||
|
173 and received a continuous <20>number unobtainable<6C> tone (as one should, it
|
|||
|
is a spare code). However, if one waited for 30 seconds, this would switch
|
|||
|
through to Bristol trunks. One person who was prosecuted was apparently
|
|||
|
running an air charter company and making all his telephone calls abroad
|
|||
|
free of charge.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A more common type of concealment occurs when, instead of waiting as above,
|
|||
|
one has to dial a further code, most commonly a digit zero. If more than one
|
|||
|
such digit is required then the access becomes difficult to find.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In spite of such attempts at concealment a large list of these was compiled.
|
|||
|
To explore the trunk network using one of these one would use the <20>chaining<6E>
|
|||
|
method to the nearest exchange providing such a trunk access. If one was
|
|||
|
lucky, one<6E>s own exchange would possess one.
|
|||
|
As a result of recent publicity the Post Office has tightened up on its own
|
|||
|
internal security and now only relatively few of these accesses are left.
|
|||
|
Fortunately, there is a more powerful way of gaining access to trunks and
|
|||
|
this involves simulating the control signals that are used on trunk routes.
|
|||
|
To explain how this can be done it is necessary to describe first the
|
|||
|
principles of telephone signalling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Telephone Signalling Systems
|
|||
|
Dial pulses, which originate at the subscriber telephone on dialling,
|
|||
|
periodically interrupt the DC path between the telephone and the exchange.
|
|||
|
This is known as loop disconnect signalling and is also used over local
|
|||
|
links between exchanges. It is not suitable for signalling over longer links
|
|||
|
because the pulses get distorted, or over microwave links where there is no
|
|||
|
DC path. Over the majority of trunk routes a type of signalling known asAC9
|
|||
|
is used. This employs a single signalling frequency of 2280 Hz, which is
|
|||
|
within the audio pass band of the circuit. Digits are transmitted as
|
|||
|
impulses of this frequency sent at dial pulse speed (10 pulses per second).
|
|||
|
Control signals are also at 2280Hz. For example, on completion of a call a
|
|||
|
continuous tone at this frequency is sent to clear down the circuit.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The STD system as so far described is inadequate in many ways. It is capable
|
|||
|
of providing only relatively simple translations and this is why subscribers
|
|||
|
who have STD cannot dial all of the exchanges on the automatic trunk
|
|||
|
network. Further, if congestion is met on any of the links within a routing
|
|||
|
then the call will fail whereas an operator would either redial or try an
|
|||
|
alternative routing. It was decided from the outset that it would be
|
|||
|
uneconomical to extend the planned STD system to cope with these problems
|
|||
|
and so a different approach known as transit working was planned.
|
|||
|
Accordingly, a completely independent trunk network is being built and is
|
|||
|
now gradually coming into operation. This is known as the trunk transit
|
|||
|
network.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the transit mode the area code is examined by the originating RT as
|
|||
|
before, but instead of producing a complete set of routing digits it simply
|
|||
|
seizes the first free circuit to the most likely switching centre capable of
|
|||
|
handling that call. If there are no free circuits then it tries its next
|
|||
|
choice of switching centre.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This distant switching centre then requests the original area code and upon
|
|||
|
receipt of this from the originating RT it will set up the next link in the
|
|||
|
same way. The intermediate RT is then released and plays no further part in
|
|||
|
the connection of the call. This process continues until the call reaches
|
|||
|
its required destination whereupon the distant RT sends back a signal to
|
|||
|
initiate the transfer of the contents of the originating register to the
|
|||
|
final register and the call is then established as before.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The area code has to be repeated by the originating RT to each of the
|
|||
|
intermediate switching centres and a slow signalling system such as AC9 is
|
|||
|
unsuitable. A high speed signalling system is therefore used and is known as
|
|||
|
SSMF2. This uses a combination of two frequencies out of a total of six to
|
|||
|
represent digits. With SSMF2, a digit may be 160 milliseconds, compared to a
|
|||
|
maximum of 1 second when using AC9. Signals in the backward direction are
|
|||
|
needed, for example to request the area code, and these are based on a
|
|||
|
further six frequencies. Supervisory again at 2280Hz in most cases,
|
|||
|
including the forward clear for example.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Blue Box
|
|||
|
It has been seen that the control signals employed within the inland trunk
|
|||
|
network are audio signals within the passband of the telephone circuit.
|
|||
|
Armed therefore with a set of audio oscillators and some means of playing
|
|||
|
combinations of these into one<6E>s telephone, one can imitate these signals. A
|
|||
|
device of doing this is known as a <20>blue box<6F> in the USA and as a <20>bleeper<65>
|
|||
|
in this country. With such a device the entire telephone system of the world
|
|||
|
is then at your command.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To imitate signalling system AC9 all that one needs is a single oscillator
|
|||
|
running at 2280Hz and a method of interrupting this at dial pulse speed. A
|
|||
|
second telephone dial is a simple and convenient method. In practice one
|
|||
|
would start by dialling an ordinary STD call and then, before the call is
|
|||
|
answered, send a short burst of tone. This <20>clears down<77> the call and one is
|
|||
|
left with an outgoing trunk route. This first link is not released because
|
|||
|
the telephone is still <20>off the hook<6F> and the DC holding conditions are
|
|||
|
still applied at the local GSC. A second burst of tone will then <20>re-seize<7A>
|
|||
|
in the sense that the switching equipment is reconnected at the distant GSC
|
|||
|
in preparation for the receipt of routing digits. These are sent using the
|
|||
|
auxiliary telephone dial just as if one was an operator or was using a trunk
|
|||
|
access.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Simulation of the MF2 signals requires, of course, six oscillators and the
|
|||
|
procedure is more complicated. However, one does not need to know any
|
|||
|
internal trunk routing digits.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Once one has unrestricted access to the trunk network in this way it is
|
|||
|
possible to gain access to the international circuits as well. Over these
|
|||
|
circuits different signalling systems are employed and these too are
|
|||
|
normally <20>in-band<6E> systems, in that they use tones with frequencies within
|
|||
|
the normal voice band of 300 to 3000 Hz. More sophisticated <20>blue boxes<65>
|
|||
|
allow one to simulate these as well and one can go even further and simulate
|
|||
|
the signalling used internally in other countries. This is the subject of
|
|||
|
Part II of this article.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Having acquired a <20>blue box<6F>, the way one explores the network is very much
|
|||
|
a question of personal taste and people tend to specialise<73>as in any hobby.
|
|||
|
To start with, most <20>blue box<6F> owners just play around and enjoy the novelty
|
|||
|
of having the world at their fingertips. Calls to various information
|
|||
|
services are popular as are calls to international operators, who are very
|
|||
|
friendly. It is a pleasant diversion on a winter evening to discuss surfing
|
|||
|
with the Honolulu operator or to chat about the weather with the Sydney
|
|||
|
operator.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One type of circuit that is quite popular is the conference call whereby a
|
|||
|
number of enthusiasts are connected together: here the conversation often
|
|||
|
tends towards <20>phone phreaking. This type of circuit arises either by
|
|||
|
accident or by design. One example of the <20>accidental conference<63> was Derry.
|
|||
|
One of its dependent exchanges got demolished by a bomb and all circuits
|
|||
|
from Derry to this exchange were connected together onto a recorded
|
|||
|
announcement. This recorded announcement became disconnected and a
|
|||
|
conference was born. Conferences also occur on an international scale and
|
|||
|
are very popular in America, where they are sometimes very sophisticated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So far nothing has been said about the legality (or otherwise) of <20>phone
|
|||
|
phreaking. Using a blue box one can make a <20>phone call to virtually anywhere
|
|||
|
in the world at the cost of a local call or even free of charge. To make a
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>phone call to somebody in this way is clearly fraudulent and if caught you
|
|||
|
would face prosecution. On the other hand, to use a <20>blue box<6F> for the
|
|||
|
purpose of exploring or studying the telephone system the situation is by no
|
|||
|
means so clear. When using an AC9 simulator, the very first forward clear
|
|||
|
causes the equipment to start metering the call and it does so, at the rate
|
|||
|
appropriate to the initial STD call, for as long as the telephone is off the
|
|||
|
hook. This occurs because the equipment mistakes the forward clear for an
|
|||
|
answer signal. For this reason the initial STD call is chosen to give a low
|
|||
|
metering rate. If one now restricts one<6E>s activities to such areas as, for
|
|||
|
example, experimenting with different signalling systems then the law is
|
|||
|
very unclear on the subject. There is certainly a good argument against
|
|||
|
one<EFBFBD>s activities being illegal.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is so easy to make STD or international calls free of charge, even with
|
|||
|
no electronic aids, that anyone wishing to do so would certainly not use a
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>blue box<6F>. In this country at least, the <20>blue box<6F> user is generally a
|
|||
|
telephone enthusiast and fairly harmless.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The world is but a Blue Box away
|
|||
|
This part of the article describes the extension of the art of phone
|
|||
|
phreaking from a national to an international scale. As already mentioned,
|
|||
|
once one has unrestricted access to trunk routes then one may also gain
|
|||
|
access to international routes. The way in which one can achieve this varies
|
|||
|
between countries.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In large countries possessing an advanced telephone system such as Australia
|
|||
|
or the USA, there are centres from which operators can originate
|
|||
|
international calls. Today, most of the world<6C>s telephone network is
|
|||
|
automatic<EFBFBD>which means that these originating operators can complete their
|
|||
|
international calls without the assistance of an operator in the distant
|
|||
|
country. The automatic switching equipment giving access to international
|
|||
|
circuits is located at centres known as Gateway exchanges, and
|
|||
|
operator-originated international traffic is first of all routed over a
|
|||
|
country<EFBFBD>s internal network to these gateway exchanges. Since the internal
|
|||
|
network therefore, carries both national and international traffic, it is
|
|||
|
easy to see that with the unrestricted access to this network provided by a
|
|||
|
Blue Box, the telephone enthusiast can himself route calls via Gateway
|
|||
|
exchanges (provided of course, that he knows the appropriate routing codes).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In this country, however, the situation is different. Until quite recently
|
|||
|
the only international operators were those located at the gateway exchange
|
|||
|
itself<EFBFBD> that is, at London<6F>s Faraday House<73>and subscribers were connected to
|
|||
|
these operators by the local operator in their own exchange or Group
|
|||
|
Switching Centre. There were no <20>shared traffic<69> routes terminating at the
|
|||
|
automatic equipment in the Gateway exchange, as in the USA. It was therefore
|
|||
|
impossible for the telephone enthusiast to gain access to international
|
|||
|
routes until 1963, when subscribers were themselves allowed to dial
|
|||
|
international calls. And as a result, such access requires a knowledge of
|
|||
|
the workings of International Subscriber Dialling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
International Subscriber Dialling
|
|||
|
International Subscriber Dialling (ISD) is the logical extension of STD. It
|
|||
|
enables subscribers to dial their own international calls and was first
|
|||
|
introduced in this country in 1963, between London and Paris. Other areas of
|
|||
|
Europe soon become available and later still, North America. The service was
|
|||
|
also made available to other areas within the UK.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One major problem associated with the introduction of ISD was not a
|
|||
|
technical one but concerned the agreements that had to be made between
|
|||
|
different countries regarding the charging of calls.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ISD works as follows. By international agreements, every country is
|
|||
|
allocated a <20>country code<64> (CC), examples being France (33), the UK (44),
|
|||
|
Israel (972) and the USA (1). In the UK a standard area code (10) is
|
|||
|
allocated to ISD and the call is handled by the register-translators (RTs)
|
|||
|
at the subscriber<65>s local exchange, in much the same way as for an ordinary
|
|||
|
STD call, the subscriber dialling an initial digit 0 to gain access to this
|
|||
|
equipment. The complete ISD dialling code is then the prefix 010 followed by
|
|||
|
the country code and then the area code within the distant country.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Upon receipt of the ISD prefix, the originating RT examines the country code
|
|||
|
to check its validity and to determine the appropriate metering rate. For a
|
|||
|
valid country code, the call is then routed over the GSC trunk exchange onto
|
|||
|
direct circuits to the automatic equipment at the London International
|
|||
|
Exchange, the originating RT being then released.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Until recently, one could dial, either over a trunk access or by AC9
|
|||
|
simulation, the appropriate routing code, which gives GSCs access to the
|
|||
|
International exchange. By by-passing the RTs in this way, the equipment did
|
|||
|
not <20>screen<65> the country code that you sent and so you could enjoy full
|
|||
|
international operator status. One example of this was Edinburgh, where the
|
|||
|
trunk routing code 515 gave you the International RTs in London. Such direct
|
|||
|
methods are no longer available owing to considerable misuse, apparently by
|
|||
|
Post Office employees.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is not obvious, by the way, why one would route the call via Edinburgh
|
|||
|
instead of going directly to London. The reason is that London is
|
|||
|
sufficiently large to justify the provision of special trunk exchanges to
|
|||
|
handle STD and ISD calls exclusively and the only routes onto these is via
|
|||
|
originating RTs at the local director exchanges: there is no way to bypass
|
|||
|
these or even gain access to them incoming into London.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It was Post Office policy to introduce ISD at provincial non-director areas
|
|||
|
only over the trunk transit network, so that it was not until early 1973
|
|||
|
that the first of these (Cardiff) had ISD. Other exchanges soon followed but
|
|||
|
for the sake of illustration we shall consider Cardiff.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In September 1 972 the first circuits between Cardiff and the London
|
|||
|
International Exchange appeared. By dialling Cardiff trunks and then the
|
|||
|
code 12 one received a signal intended to initialise the transfer of digits,
|
|||
|
in SSMF2 form, from the Cardiff RT to the international registers. If one<6E>s
|
|||
|
Blue Box was capable of sending SSMF2 one could respond to this signal, send
|
|||
|
whatever country code one pleased into the international registers, and
|
|||
|
again achieve international operator status. Those lucky enough to possess
|
|||
|
an SSMF2 Blue Box enjoyed the novelty of this new route to the rest of the
|
|||
|
world.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Post Office was disconcerted at this traffic appearing as soon as the
|
|||
|
circuits were installed and very quickly (i.e. a year later) took steps to
|
|||
|
prevent such misuse. By the following February the Cardiff RTs had been
|
|||
|
programmed to accept SD calls and the service became available to the
|
|||
|
public. (Coin boxes in Cardiff, incidentally, could not handle the high
|
|||
|
metering rate on calls to North America and so these were free of charge).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TELEPHONE SYSTEMS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
|
|||
|
Once a call has been set up to another country it is possible to simulate
|
|||
|
the signalling employed over the international route and to explore the
|
|||
|
internal network of the distant country. The two most important signalling
|
|||
|
systems used over international circuits are known as CCITT4 and CCITT5.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the signalling system CCITT4 digits are sent as four-bit binary numbers
|
|||
|
using two frequencies, 2400Hz and 2040Hz, to represent 0 and 1 respectively.
|
|||
|
The control signals also use these frequencies. Digits are sent in response
|
|||
|
to signals received from the distant equipment, and the transit method of
|
|||
|
working is generally employed between different countries. (The principles
|
|||
|
of the transit working have been described in the first part of this
|
|||
|
article, as they apply to the internal trunk network in the UK).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This signalling system is unsuitable for use over satellite circuits since
|
|||
|
these introduce a return signal path of about 100,000 miles in
|
|||
|
length<EFBFBD>corresponding to a time delay of some 600 milliseconds. In a
|
|||
|
compelled signalling system such as CCITT4 this delay is added to the
|
|||
|
sending time of each digit which makes the overall setting-up time for a
|
|||
|
call for too high, bearing in mind the need for efficient use of expensive
|
|||
|
satellite circuits. CCITT4 finds its main application over shorter
|
|||
|
international routes, the main areas being Europe, South America and Africa.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Over intercontinental and satellite circuits the system CCITT5 is normally
|
|||
|
used. This is a high speed signalling system. Digits are sent in
|
|||
|
multifrequency (MF) form similar to the SSMF2 system already described but
|
|||
|
using different frequencies. The CCITT5 frequencies are the same as those
|
|||
|
used by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) for the North
|
|||
|
American internal signalling system, which is very convenient for the Blue
|
|||
|
Box user. The two signalling systems differ only in the supervisory or
|
|||
|
control signals.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The simulation of CCITT4 was of great interest to the telephone enthusiast
|
|||
|
in the early days of ISD when the international RTs handing ISD traffic had
|
|||
|
access only to those countries to which ISD was allowed. For example, Russia
|
|||
|
was first reached in this way; a call to Switzerland (which was allowed) was
|
|||
|
made and then extended to Moscow via the Warsaw transit.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Since then, the equipment known as International Common Access (ICA) over
|
|||
|
which international operators connect calls, has become available for ISD
|
|||
|
traffic and most countries are now directly available to the enthusiast by
|
|||
|
the methods described above. With the availability of ICA interest in CCITT4
|
|||
|
simulation has diminished.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Simulation of CCITT5 is simpler than for CCITT4 since one does not have to
|
|||
|
respond to backward signals and the procedure is simpler. Furthermore, with
|
|||
|
the addition of a single frequency, 2600Hz, the simulator can be used within
|
|||
|
North America. If one is actually in North America then the procedure is
|
|||
|
indeed very simple and it requires very little effort to make calls free of
|
|||
|
charge to almost anywhere in the world. This accounts for the tremendous
|
|||
|
popularity of Blue Box in that continent, the vast majority being primarily
|
|||
|
interested in saving money on telephone bills. There are only a handful of
|
|||
|
enthusiasts interested in telephones their own sake.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is possible to simulate the North American signalling system from the UK.
|
|||
|
The procedure is best described means of an example. Suppose you felt
|
|||
|
inclined to telephone an adjacent <20>phone box via America you would proceed
|
|||
|
follows. First set up a call to, say, the Philadelphia weather forecast.
|
|||
|
Having done this you would send a short burst of 2600Hz. This is a <20>tone on
|
|||
|
idle<EFBFBD> supervisory frequency<63>that is, the application of this tone will
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>clear down<77> the US internal circuit and its removal will reseize a circuit,
|
|||
|
the international circuit from the UK to the USA be unaffected. Next you
|
|||
|
would send (in MF form) the following digits<74>KP 212-183 ST. The signals KP
|
|||
|
(Key Pulse) and ST (Start) are MF signals, which must enclose blocks of
|
|||
|
digits sent. This will connect you to area 212 (New York) and to the
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>overseas sender<65> in that Gateway, the code 183 being its international
|
|||
|
access code. When this equipment is ready to receive digits it returns a
|
|||
|
continuous tone whereupon you send KP0441 838 7062 ST. The initial zero is a
|
|||
|
dummy digit, 44 is the country code for the UK, 1 is the area code for
|
|||
|
London and this is followed, in this example, by the required London number.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I find the Australian telephone system much more interesting than American.
|
|||
|
There are two independent trunk networks Down Under<65>the (multifrequency
|
|||
|
compelled), and the 2VF (two voice frequency), handling STD and
|
|||
|
operator-originated traffic respectively.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As far as I know, nobody outside of Australia has managed to simulate the
|
|||
|
MFC signalling, the difficulty being that the control signals are <20>outband<6E>
|
|||
|
(sent outside the normal 3000Hz voice frequency band). But provided that one
|
|||
|
is incoming into Australia with operator status one can gain access to the
|
|||
|
2VF network at centres such as Melbourne or Brisbane. This assumes that one
|
|||
|
knows the appropriate access codes. The 2VF network employs the AC1
|
|||
|
signalling system, which uses two signalling frequencies: 600Hz and 750Hz.
|
|||
|
Digits are sent in a similar to AC9 signals but use the 600Hz frequency. The
|
|||
|
supervisory signals are different, the forward clear for example,
|
|||
|
consistency of the 750Hz tone applied for 2 seconds followed by 0.7 seconds
|
|||
|
of the 600Hz tone. This signalling system preceded AC9 in this country and
|
|||
|
is still used to some extent. One can sometimes hear its very characteristic
|
|||
|
<EFBFBD>forward clear<61> tone over UK trunk routes when crosstalk occurs between
|
|||
|
channels using AC1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Australia has one Gateway exchange, located in Sydney, and a second coming
|
|||
|
into operation shortly. Modern Crossbar switching is employed at the
|
|||
|
Gateway, and this has the facility of restricting the access to the outgoing
|
|||
|
circuits in the transit mode to the appropriate incoming routes. This means,
|
|||
|
for instance, that if you were incoming from London, the country code 44 for
|
|||
|
the UK would not be accepted, because the equipment can recognise that calls
|
|||
|
from one part of the UK to another are not normally routed via Sydney, even
|
|||
|
though a telephone enthusiast might consider it a reasonable thing to do. In
|
|||
|
practice, transit access from Sydney to New Zealand, Hong Kong and Malaga is
|
|||
|
all that is allowed to UK traffic<69>which is of restricted interest to the UK
|
|||
|
telephone enthusiast since these countries are available directly via the
|
|||
|
International Common Access System.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
>From the enthusiast<73>s point of view it is therefore fortunate that there is
|
|||
|
a way of gaining unrestricted access to the international exchange and this
|
|||
|
works as follows. Operators in certain large exchanges, such as Adelaide,
|
|||
|
can dial their own international calls, rather than having to rely upon the
|
|||
|
international operators in Sydney. This traffic is routed over the 2VF
|
|||
|
network and, as has been mentioned above, it is possible to gain access to
|
|||
|
this network incoming into Australia. This makes it possible to set up a
|
|||
|
telephone call all the way round the world.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Firstly, set-up a call to Adelaide via New York (or some other US Gateway)
|
|||
|
and then send the 2VF access code and the 2VF routing for Sydney, all using
|
|||
|
CCITT5/USA signalling. Having allowed this connection to complete, the
|
|||
|
distant 2VF circuit will now accept AC1 signals. Using the pulsed 600 Hz
|
|||
|
signalling for the digits, one next sends the digits 99 1 44 2 1 838 7603
|
|||
|
followed by a short burst of tone at 750Hz to indicate end of signalling.
|
|||
|
The digits 99 are the access code for the Gateway exchange, the digit 1 is
|
|||
|
used for discrimination purposes and the country code 44 is for the UK. The
|
|||
|
next digit, 2, is known as a language digit and indicates in this case that
|
|||
|
the call is being set up by an English speaking operator. The area code for
|
|||
|
London is 1 and this is followed by the required London number. This rather
|
|||
|
cumbersome procedure follows from difficulty in interfacing an older type of
|
|||
|
signalling, AC1, with the international routing equipment. A call set up in
|
|||
|
this way will be routed, via the Indian ocean satellite, back to London.
|
|||
|
This feat was first achieved in the June of 1972.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The term <20>language digit<69> referred to above is rather a misnomer and
|
|||
|
originated in the days when most of the international circuits were operated
|
|||
|
manually. This meant that an originating international operator could not in
|
|||
|
general complete a call but would require the assistance of an operator in
|
|||
|
the distant country and the purpose of the language digit was to ensure that
|
|||
|
the call was routed to an assistance operator speaking a specified language.
|
|||
|
Today, the bulk of international traffic is switched automatically and
|
|||
|
furthermore the English language has become more or less universally used by
|
|||
|
international operators. A few countries such as France and Russia insist on
|
|||
|
using the French language. Spanish is used to some extent within South
|
|||
|
America but in the vast majority of cases the language digit has become
|
|||
|
redundant. Its use is however mandatory by international agreements and must
|
|||
|
be used.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Many countries now have ISD and with the increase in subscriber originated
|
|||
|
traffic international agreements have come into force that require such
|
|||
|
traffic to carry the language digit zero. This is to allow discrimination by
|
|||
|
the incoming equipment to prevent certain types of call. For example, a
|
|||
|
subscriber is not allowed access to an assistance operator. When ISD was
|
|||
|
first introduced to New York from London one could dial New York using the
|
|||
|
published dialling code 0101 212, followed by the New York number. But
|
|||
|
instead of dialling a New York number, one could dial a further North
|
|||
|
American area code and follow this by 1211 to reach the incoming assistance
|
|||
|
operator in that area, free of charge. This gave interesting possibilities,
|
|||
|
you could call the Montreal operator and ask for Sydney, then ask Sydney for
|
|||
|
Hong Kong. All of this is possible to a Blue Box user but in those days it
|
|||
|
was quite novel, and required no special equipment or dialling codes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Today, discrimination by means of the language digit <20>0<EFBFBD> prevents all this.
|
|||
|
This language digit is automatically inserted by the London ICA equipment
|
|||
|
when accessed via ISD routes and it follows, therefore, that traffic to, say
|
|||
|
Australia (a non-ISD country) having this language digit can only have
|
|||
|
originated from a telephone enthusiast. In an attempt to thwart such
|
|||
|
activities the Australian authorities have arranged for the incoming
|
|||
|
equipment to reject incoming traffic from London with this language digit.
|
|||
|
This can only be a temporary measure since ISD to Australia will be
|
|||
|
introduced in two or three years time. In the meantime, one can route calls
|
|||
|
via the USA or, say, Copenhagen, using methods described above. Throughout
|
|||
|
the world the various telephone administrations are making increasing
|
|||
|
efforts to prevent the activities of the telephone enthusiast and it is
|
|||
|
this, I think, that will keep the hobby alive as new areas of exploration
|
|||
|
diminish. After all it<69>s nice to beat the system but even nicer to beat the
|
|||
|
people trying to stop you.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By DUO_PROS (aka Happy McSmith)
|