169 lines
5.9 KiB
Plaintext
169 lines
5.9 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138018 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
21-Apr-88 07:56:23
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michelle & Charles 76701,11
|
|||
|
|
To: All
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
I'm sure most of you are aware that the Air Force released information about
|
|||
|
|
the new Stealth bomber yesterday. Based on the information they presented,
|
|||
|
|
one could suggest that some (many?) of the UFO sightings in the Hudson Valley
|
|||
|
|
(again, Kudos to Phil I. for the excellent documentation on the subject)
|
|||
|
|
could, in fact, be Stealth sightings.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Most interesting is the shape of the bomber -- it is a flying wing. You
|
|||
|
|
could, without streching things, call it a flying boomerang. The design does
|
|||
|
|
remind one of the UFOs observed.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This message is not an argument that the sightings in the Hudson Valley were,
|
|||
|
|
in fact, Stealth sightings. I'm just pointing out some parallels...
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
-- charles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Replies: 138024, 138051
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138024 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
21-Apr-88 10:03:30
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138018-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michael H. Surabian 75130,15
|
|||
|
|
To: Michelle & Charles 76701,11 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Hi! Have been follwing this forum for a few months and have read most of the
|
|||
|
|
available info in Dl and many of the books discussed. Living in Central MA I
|
|||
|
|
had hoped to be hearing of the sightings or some other activity moving up this
|
|||
|
|
way. Did the Air Force release any info on the capabilities of the Stealth
|
|||
|
|
Bomber in question? I must admit that if this could be an explanation, I'm
|
|||
|
|
really disappointed. Had hoped for something more... ceslestial(?).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Replies: 138029, 138041
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138029 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
21-Apr-88 13:28:50
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138024-"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michelle & Charles 76701,11
|
|||
|
|
To: Michael H. Surabian 75130,15 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Not much. They claim that they will have the first units delivered later on,
|
|||
|
|
although, clearly, they've have prototypes since one of them has already
|
|||
|
|
crashed...
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If this is the explanation, there's a lot of facts that have to be explained
|
|||
|
|
away that don't readily fit in. (Like the hovering and strange reversal of
|
|||
|
|
course)....
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
-- charles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138051 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
21-Apr-88 18:26:33
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138018-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Sysop David Bush 76701,75
|
|||
|
|
To: Michelle & Charles 76701,11 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
There was a piece on All Things Considered today suggesting that this whole
|
|||
|
|
story was part of an Air Force disinformation campaign. The suggestion was
|
|||
|
|
the the stealth plane acutally looks more like the Revelle model than the
|
|||
|
|
drawing that the Air Force showed.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138053
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138053 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
21-Apr-88 19:51:30
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138051-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michelle & Charles 76701,11
|
|||
|
|
To: Sysop David Bush 76701,75 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It would seem odd that they showed what was, at best, an "artist's impression"
|
|||
|
|
of the plane. If they're that near to delivery, then they should have very
|
|||
|
|
good computerized drawings of the plane, not to mention scale models.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
You raise an interesting point!
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138073
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138073 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
22-Apr-88 00:41:16
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138053-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Gerry Zeitlin 71605,2013
|
|||
|
|
To: Michelle & Charles 76701,11 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Maybe the reason they only released a vague sketch is that they don't intend
|
|||
|
|
to let anyone get a close look at it, for as long as it can be avoided,
|
|||
|
|
because details of its shape are so critical to stealth technology, and we may
|
|||
|
|
be ahead of "the other side" in this technology.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This would mean that the Hudson Valley boomerang could not be a stealth
|
|||
|
|
bomber. Another reason for its not being a stealth bomber is that a populated
|
|||
|
|
area like that would be a poor choice for conducting flight tests.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Arguing against this line of reasoning is the fact that spy satellites could
|
|||
|
|
easily resolve the shape as soon as one flies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138084
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138084 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
22-Apr-88 06:28:20
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138073-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michelle & Charles 76701,11
|
|||
|
|
To: Gerry Zeitlin 71605,2013 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
At least one has flown, insofar as at least one has already crashed.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
I agree completely about Westchester being inappropriate for flight tests. It
|
|||
|
|
would be unlikely that they would do so. On the other hand, one could argue
|
|||
|
|
that it is at least equally unlikely that UFOs are the cause of all sightings,
|
|||
|
|
too.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
-- charles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138166
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138166 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
23-Apr-88 17:38:15
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138084-#"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Gerry Zeitlin 71605,2013
|
|||
|
|
To: Michelle & Charles 76701,11 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
I've just been reading Phil's update in file NIGHT, in which he gives numerous
|
|||
|
|
descriptions of the flight characteristics, size, and look of this boomerang
|
|||
|
|
affair. (I'm still trying to cover the current literature in this UFO scene,
|
|||
|
|
after having given up following it, in frustration, several years ago. I
|
|||
|
|
haven't read _Night Siege_ yet.) You know, there's no point trying to make
|
|||
|
|
the stealth bomber explain what people are reporting. It's an aircraft after
|
|||
|
|
all, and it's not going to hover over people's houses and shine down strange
|
|||
|
|
lights. Furthermore, this activity has apparently been going on for years
|
|||
|
|
now. Could the stealth bomber have been undergoing flight tests all that
|
|||
|
|
time, in a populated area no less, with the Air Force only now releasing a
|
|||
|
|
sketch of it?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138171
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138171 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
23-Apr-88 18:55:54
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #138166-"Stealth"y UFOs
|
|||
|
|
Fm: Michelle & Charles 76701,11
|
|||
|
|
To: Gerry Zeitlin 71605,2013 (X)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It would seem unlikely. Almost as unlikely, one is tempted to say, as it all
|
|||
|
|
being caused by extraterrestial beings.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
-- charles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Function:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#: 138180 S10/Paranormal Issues
|
|||
|
|
24-Apr-88 09:10:50
|
|||
|
|
Sb: #STEALTH
|
|||
|
|
Fm: PHIL 76636,44
|
|||
|
|
To: ALL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
THE THOUGHT ENTERED OUR MIND IF SOME OF THE SIGHTINGS WERE CAUSED BY HIGH
|
|||
|
|
ALTITUDE STEALTH OPERATIONS. I DOUBT IT! IT DOES NOT SEEM LOGICAL THAT OUR
|
|||
|
|
GOVERMENT WOULD EXPERIMENT IN SUCH A DENSELEY POPOULATED AREA. ALSO THE AIR
|
|||
|
|
TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA IS HEAVY. ALSO MANY OF THE SIGHTINGS OF THE HVUFO WERE AT
|
|||
|
|
LOW ALTITUDE.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Reply: 138210
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|