96 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
96 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
5/20/90
|
|||
|
|
By Bryon Smith
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Strange Things are Afoot at the "Circle (R)"
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
O*****[============- -============]*****O
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
One thing that I know for sure is that "you never can be to sure"
|
|||
|
|
what is going on and what the truth really is about certain things.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Just a few days ago my little sister called me on the phone and said
|
|||
|
|
"I am returning your call." I set there for a moment and said "what ?"
|
|||
|
|
She said that I had called her that morning just before 8am and that
|
|||
|
|
she had just gotten the message and was returning my call. Quickly I
|
|||
|
|
questioned myself and recounted all of my actions that morning up to
|
|||
|
|
that very moment and I said "I haven't called anyone this morning, in
|
|||
|
|
fact I have only been on the phone once this morning and that was to
|
|||
|
|
answer a call from the wife, and this is the second time on the phone
|
|||
|
|
this morning."
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gina didn't think long about what I had said before she came back
|
|||
|
|
with a "well it sure sounds like you on the recording and it gave this
|
|||
|
|
same number."
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Well it was my number all right. She played the tape for me and I
|
|||
|
|
took a recording of it. Sure enough it was my voice, and I had even
|
|||
|
|
give the time of the call and my voice phone number both of which were
|
|||
|
|
correct. It was just as if I had made the call, only one small catch, I
|
|||
|
|
had not made that call.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Her answering machine is computerize and counts the number of calls
|
|||
|
|
that come into her office and it had counted that message as a new
|
|||
|
|
call.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
That morning she came into the office before 8am and had 3 messages
|
|||
|
|
on the first part of the tape. She listened to them and then reset the
|
|||
|
|
tape as she always does every morning. The machine always records right
|
|||
|
|
over the top of the last messages unless you tell it to save the
|
|||
|
|
message. She left the office for a little bit and came back and checked
|
|||
|
|
and the machine said there were two new messages and she played them
|
|||
|
|
back. There was my voice as big as life, it gave the time and made
|
|||
|
|
mention of our elder sister who is deceased as if she were still alive.
|
|||
|
|
This made me think it was an old message, but the tape had been
|
|||
|
|
recorded over, it had run several other messages over the top of any
|
|||
|
|
old messages that might have been at the start of the tape. If that had
|
|||
|
|
been an old message it would have been from last December and that
|
|||
|
|
would have made it at least 4 months old. The next thing is that the
|
|||
|
|
computer counts all of the calls that come in since the last time they
|
|||
|
|
were reviewed and it said there was two new calls which counted "my"
|
|||
|
|
message as a new call.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The next message after "mine" was from her husband and after it the
|
|||
|
|
machine gave the date and time of the call. We noticed that after my
|
|||
|
|
message it had not given the date and time after the call but it was my
|
|||
|
|
voice that had given the time of the call. This was unusual to say the
|
|||
|
|
least. It had counted it as a call, yet had not posted the time and
|
|||
|
|
date after the call. It played it and counted it as a call so why
|
|||
|
|
didn't it put the time and date after it as it normally does ? Right
|
|||
|
|
after that was her husband and it counted the time and date as normal.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
How could an old message come through an old tape as if it were a new
|
|||
|
|
message ? How could the computer count it as a new call and not put the
|
|||
|
|
time and date after the call ? The time was right on the money and was
|
|||
|
|
given by "my voice." Had I actually made the call the machine would
|
|||
|
|
have placed the time and date after the call and there would have been
|
|||
|
|
little doubt that I had made the call myself and just "forgotten about
|
|||
|
|
it" or perhaps was lying and saying that I had not made the call when
|
|||
|
|
in fact I had. The oddity itself indicates that something out of the
|
|||
|
|
normal had taken place though and gave certain evidence to prove that I
|
|||
|
|
was telling the truth and I had not made that call.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The fact that her husband had called right after my "call" had proven
|
|||
|
|
very close to the fact when the call had been recorded and it was right
|
|||
|
|
in the correct time slot.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
I told her of a UFO crash that had not been to many days ago at which
|
|||
|
|
certain people had gathered to talk about the event. Certain other
|
|||
|
|
people were seen and some even talked to others there and later when
|
|||
|
|
they were contacted by these people about the crash they knew nothing
|
|||
|
|
about it. They said they had not been there at all and could prove it.
|
|||
|
|
So how is it these other people swear that they saw and even talked
|
|||
|
|
with certain of these other people if they were not there ? And what
|
|||
|
|
about the UFO crash ? Did the thing just up and vanish without a trace
|
|||
|
|
and with no other "media" reports ? Was it as if it had never actually
|
|||
|
|
happened ? If so then what did happen ?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
So strange things are afoot at the "Circle (R)" and if you see or
|
|||
|
|
hear from someone who later says they were not there or had not tried
|
|||
|
|
to contact you, and don't know what you are talking about don't be
|
|||
|
|
surprised.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
...Bryon
|
|||
|
|
|