125 lines
6.1 KiB
Plaintext
125 lines
6.1 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
SUBJECT: GULFBREEZE DOUBLE TROUBLE? BY JOHN HICKS FILE: UFO1661
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Gulf Breeze Double Trouble
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
by John B. Hicks
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
In his recent publication, Gulf Breeze Double Exposed, Zan Overall
|
||
|
attempts to prove that Ed Walters knew how to make a double exposure with
|
||
|
his Polaroid camera as early as 1986.
|
||
|
If this knowledge were proven, serious doubt would be cast on Walters'
|
||
|
credibility, since he told MUFON investigators that he did not know how to
|
||
|
make a double exposure in 1987.
|
||
|
Overall's examination of the subject is coherent except that he
|
||
|
apparently overlooked one vital factor, as we will see.
|
||
|
Overall uses the now infamous "Ghost Demon" photograph as the basis of
|
||
|
his conclusion. He concludes that the anomalous blobs of light in the upper
|
||
|
left area of the photograph could not be the result of anything other than
|
||
|
an intentional double exposure.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The "Ghost Demon" photograph:
|
||
|
|
||
|
The photograph in question was taken by Ed Walters at a party in his
|
||
|
house in 1986 with his Polaroid camera on Type 108 film. The photograph is
|
||
|
of a girl standing in front of a background, which has been identified as a
|
||
|
black-painted plywood support board for Walters' son's science fair
|
||
|
project. Above the girl's left shoulder appears several large, unsharp
|
||
|
blobs of light areas which some claim is supposed to represent the image of
|
||
|
a ghost or demon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The camera:
|
||
|
|
||
|
The camera Walters used is an unknown model Polaroid camera. It takes
|
||
|
Type 108 or Type 107 (black and white) film, has an autoexposure
|
||
|
capability, and uses flashcubes. The camera is about 14 years old.
|
||
|
If the light level drops below the capability of the autoexposure
|
||
|
system, the shutter stays open for as long as the shutter button is
|
||
|
depressed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zan Overall's thesis:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Overall proposes that the "Ghost Demon" picture could only have been made
|
||
|
by an intentional double exposure. That is, he claims that the picture
|
||
|
could only be the result of taking a picture of whatever would provide the
|
||
|
desired effect, and then taking a picture of the girl on the same sheet of
|
||
|
film.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Discussion:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Overall overlooked or did not know of two very important factors, both of
|
||
|
which were involved in the making of the UFO photographs, and would have
|
||
|
been involved in the making of the GD photograph.
|
||
|
The first is that if the light level is too low for the Polaroid
|
||
|
autoexposure system, the camera simply holds the shutter open as long as
|
||
|
the shutter button is depressed. This has the effect of providing a time
|
||
|
exposure, and the timing of the exposure is done, intentionally or
|
||
|
unintentionally, by the photographer. The camera shutter behaves the same
|
||
|
way, regardless of whether or not a flashcube is used.
|
||
|
This time exposure effect has been confirmed.
|
||
|
The second factor is that Ed Walters pushes the shutter button, holds it
|
||
|
down, and then lets go. He does not just tap it; he pushes it and holds it
|
||
|
down.
|
||
|
Bruce Maccabee and others timed his pressing and releasing of the shutter
|
||
|
and found that he averaged from one half second to one and a half seconds
|
||
|
between when he opened the shutter and when he let it close again.
|
||
|
I personally observed Walters taking pictures with a different type of
|
||
|
camera, which would not be affected by how long the shutter button was
|
||
|
depressed, and for each exposure, he held the shutter button down in excess
|
||
|
of one second.
|
||
|
Thus, for that Polaroid camera as operated by Ed Walters, effectively two
|
||
|
exposures can unintentionally be made on one sheet of film with one shutter
|
||
|
operation. The times of each exposure overlap.
|
||
|
When Walters pushes the shutter button, and he is using a flashcube, the
|
||
|
shutter opens. As soon as the shutter is fully open, the flashbulb in the
|
||
|
flashcube fires.
|
||
|
From flash ignition to extinction would be about one-fifteenth of a
|
||
|
second or less. The actual total burn time could be determined by
|
||
|
contacting the manufacturer of the flashcube, but a flashcube uses four
|
||
|
common AG-1 flashbulbs which are of the M-sync short-duration type.
|
||
|
If we assume, based on other observations, that the total time the
|
||
|
shutter was open was one second, we are left with fourteen-fifteeths of a
|
||
|
second, which is ample time for other dimmer light sources or reflections
|
||
|
to be recorded on the film.
|
||
|
Since the "ghost" image does not appear to be made by a light source, we
|
||
|
are left to consider a reflection.
|
||
|
The plywood cannot be mirror-smooth, so any reflections off the plywood
|
||
|
could be at any angle from less than perpendicular to the film plane
|
||
|
to any fraction of an angle less than 180 degrees from the angle of incidence.
|
||
|
Thus, any room light relatively level with the camera height (not overhead)
|
||
|
within a wide arc could have caused the light blobs via reflection.
|
||
|
The board was painted black, but it is unknown if that paint was gloss,
|
||
|
lustre or flat. Flat black has the least reflectance, but almost any
|
||
|
commercial photographer who does product photography in a studio would
|
||
|
confirm that even flat black paint causes many annoying (for the
|
||
|
photographer) reflections and sheens. That is, although the board may
|
||
|
appear black to the eye, it does not appear non-reflective black to the
|
||
|
film.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Conclusion:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Since the board can reflect room light, at least as a sheen, and Ed
|
||
|
Walters was unknowingly making long enough time exposures for a sheen or
|
||
|
reflections to be recorded on film, regardless of the flash, the "Ghost
|
||
|
Demon" photograph in question could have been made on one sheet of film in
|
||
|
one shutter cycle. No double exposure would have been required.
|
||
|
Bruce Maccabee has also demonstrated a similar effect by the use of a
|
||
|
flashlight as a secondary light source.
|
||
|
Therefore Ed Walters did not necessarily know how to make a double
|
||
|
exposure in 1986.
|
||
|
I am willing to demonstrate the same effects to anyone who
|
||
|
supplies a similar Polaroid camera, film, a flashcube, and is willing to
|
||
|
come to Orlando, Florida or cover my travel expenses to see it done.
|
||
|
|
||
|
###
|
||
|
|
||
|
**********************************************
|
||
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
||
|
**********************************************
|