107 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
107 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
SUBJECT: A WEE BIT ON CROP CIRCLES FILE: UFO1210
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5/20/90
|
||
|
|
By Bryon Smith
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Strange Things are Afoot at the "Circle (R)"
|
||
|
|
O*****[============- -============]*****O
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
One thing that I know for sure is that "you never can be to
|
||
|
|
sure" what is going on and what the truth really is about
|
||
|
|
certain things.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Just a few days ago my little sister called me on the phone
|
||
|
|
and said "I am returning your call." I set there for a moment
|
||
|
|
and said "what ?" She said that I had called her that morning
|
||
|
|
just before 8am and that she had just gotten the message and was
|
||
|
|
returning my call. Quickly I questioned myself and recounted
|
||
|
|
all of my actions that morning up to that very moment and I said
|
||
|
|
"I haven't called anyone this morning, in fact I have only been
|
||
|
|
on the phone once this morning and that was to answer a call
|
||
|
|
from the wife, and this is the second time on the phone this
|
||
|
|
morning."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Gina didn't think long about what I had said before she
|
||
|
|
came back with a "well it sure sounds like you on the recording
|
||
|
|
and it gave this same number."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Well it was my number all right. She played the tape for
|
||
|
|
me and I took a recording of it. Sure enough it was my voice,
|
||
|
|
and I had even give the time of the call and my voice phone
|
||
|
|
number both of which were correct. It was just as if I had made
|
||
|
|
the call, only one small catch, I had not made that call.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Her answering machine is computerize and counts the number
|
||
|
|
of calls that come into her office and it had counted that
|
||
|
|
message as a new call.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
That morning she came into the office before 8am and had
|
||
|
|
3 messages on the first part of the tape. She listened to them
|
||
|
|
and then reset the tape as she always does every morning. The
|
||
|
|
machine always records right over the top of the last messages
|
||
|
|
unless you tell it to save the message. She left the office for
|
||
|
|
a little bit and came back and checked and the machine said
|
||
|
|
there were two new messages and she played them back. There was
|
||
|
|
my voice as big as life, it gave the time and made mention of
|
||
|
|
our elder sister who is deceased as if she were still alive.
|
||
|
|
This made me think it was an old message, but the tape had been
|
||
|
|
recorded over, it had run several other messages over the top of
|
||
|
|
any old messages that might have been at the start of the tape.
|
||
|
|
If that had been an old message it would have been from last
|
||
|
|
December and that would have made it at least 4 months old. The
|
||
|
|
next thing is that the computer counts all of the calls that
|
||
|
|
come in since the last time they were reviewed and it said there
|
||
|
|
was two new calls which counted "my" message as a new call.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The next message after "mine" was from her husband and
|
||
|
|
after it the machine gave the date and time of the call. We
|
||
|
|
noticed that after my message it had not given the date and time
|
||
|
|
after the call but it was my voice that had given the time of
|
||
|
|
the call. This was unusual to say the least. It had counted it
|
||
|
|
as a call, yet had not posted the time and date after the call.
|
||
|
|
It played it and counted it as a call so why didn't it put the
|
||
|
|
time and date after it as it normally does ? Right after that
|
||
|
|
was her husband and it counted the time and date as normal.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
How could an old message come through an old tape as if it
|
||
|
|
were a new message ? How could the computer count it as a new
|
||
|
|
call and not put the time and date after the call ? The time
|
||
|
|
was right on the money and was given by "my voice." Had I
|
||
|
|
actually made the call the machine would have placed the time
|
||
|
|
and date after the call and there would have been little doubt
|
||
|
|
that I had made the call myself and just "forgotten about it" or
|
||
|
|
perhaps was lying and saying that I had not made the call when
|
||
|
|
in fact I had. The oddity itself indicates that something out
|
||
|
|
of the normal had taken place though and gave certain evidence
|
||
|
|
to prove that I was telling the truth and I had not made that
|
||
|
|
call.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The fact that her husband had called right after my "call"
|
||
|
|
had proven very close to the fact when the call had been
|
||
|
|
recorded and it was right in the correct time slot.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I told her of a UFO crash that had not been to many days
|
||
|
|
ago at which certain people had gathered to talk about the
|
||
|
|
event. Certain other people were seen and some even talked to
|
||
|
|
others there and later when they were contacted by these people
|
||
|
|
about the crash they knew nothing about it. They said they had
|
||
|
|
not been there at all and could prove it. So how is it these
|
||
|
|
other people swear that they saw and even talked with certain of
|
||
|
|
these other people if they were not there ? And what about the
|
||
|
|
UFO crash ? Did the thing just up and vanish without a trace
|
||
|
|
and with no other "media" reports ? Was it as if it had never
|
||
|
|
actually happened ? If so then what did happen ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So strange things are afoot at the "Circle (R)" and if you
|
||
|
|
see or hear from someone who later says they were not there or
|
||
|
|
had not tried to contact you, and don't know what you are
|
||
|
|
talking about don't be surprised.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
...Bryon
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**********************************************
|
||
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
||
|
|
**********************************************
|