378 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
378 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
|
Primer of Jungian Psychology
|
|||
|
============================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) was a son of a minister in Switzerland. He was
|
|||
|
born on July 26, in the small village of Kesswil on Lake Constance. He was
|
|||
|
named after his grandfather, a professor of medicine at the University of
|
|||
|
Basel. He was the oldest child and only surviving son of a Swiss Reform
|
|||
|
pastor. Two brothers died in infancy before Jung was born. Jung's mother was
|
|||
|
a neurotic and often fought with his father. Father was usually lonely and
|
|||
|
very irritable. When the child could not take his mother's depressions and his
|
|||
|
parents' fights, he sought refuge in the attic, where he played with a wooden
|
|||
|
mannikin. Carl was exposed to death early in life, since his father was a
|
|||
|
minister and attended many funerals, taking his son with him. Also, Jung saw
|
|||
|
many fishermen get killed in the waterfalls and also many pigs get slaughtered.
|
|||
|
When he was eleven, he went to a school in Basel, met many rich people and
|
|||
|
realized that he was poor, compared to them. He liked to read very much
|
|||
|
outside of class and detested math and physical education classes. Actually,
|
|||
|
gym class used to give him fainting spells (neurosis) and his father worried
|
|||
|
that Jung wouldn't make a good living because of his spells. After Carl found
|
|||
|
out about his father's concern, the faints suddenly stopped, and Carl became
|
|||
|
much more studious.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He had to decide his profession. His choices included archeology, history,
|
|||
|
medicine, and philosophy. He decided to go into medicine, partly because of
|
|||
|
his grandfather. Carl went to the University of Basel and had to decide then
|
|||
|
what field of medicine he was going to go into. After reading a book on
|
|||
|
psychiatry, he decided that this was the field for him, although psychiatry was
|
|||
|
not a respectable field at the time. Jung became an assistant at the
|
|||
|
Burgholzli Mental hospital in Zurich, a famous medical hospital. He studied
|
|||
|
under Eugen Bleuler, who was a famous psychiatrist who defined schizophrenia.
|
|||
|
Jung was also influenced by Freud with whom he later became good friends.
|
|||
|
Freud called him his crown-prince. Their relationship ended when Jung wrote a
|
|||
|
book called "Symbols of Transformation." Jung disagreed with Freud's
|
|||
|
fundamental idea that a symbol is a disguised representation of a repressed
|
|||
|
wish. I will go into that later. After splitting up with Freud, Jung had a 2
|
|||
|
year period of non-productivity, but then he came out with his "Psychological
|
|||
|
Types," a famous work. He went on several trips to learn about primitive
|
|||
|
societies and archetypes to Africa, New Mexico to study Pueblo Indians, and to
|
|||
|
India and Ceylon to study eastern philosophy. He studied religious and occult
|
|||
|
beliefs like I Ching, a Chinese method of fortune telling. Alchemy was also
|
|||
|
one of his interests. His book, "Psychology and Alchemy," published in 1944 is
|
|||
|
among his most important writings. He studied what all this told about the
|
|||
|
human mind. One of his methods was word association, which is when a person is
|
|||
|
given a series of words and asked to respond to them. Abnormal response or
|
|||
|
hesitation can mean that the person has a complex about that word.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
His basic belief was in complex or analytical psychology. The goal is
|
|||
|
psychosynthesis, or the unification and differentiation of the psyche (mind).
|
|||
|
He believed that the mind started out as a whole and should stay that way.
|
|||
|
That answered structural, dynamic, developmental questions. I will attempt to
|
|||
|
restate the major ideas and terms in this book in a pseudo-outline. It will
|
|||
|
make the understanding a bit more clear.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
STRUCTURE
|
|||
|
---------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Jung said that there are three levels of mind. Conscious, Personal
|
|||
|
Subconscious, and Collective Subconscious. The conscious level serves four
|
|||
|
functions. The following are the functions of people (not types!):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A. Thinking: connecting ideas in ordered strings.
|
|||
|
B. Feeling: evaluating ideas upon feelings about them.
|
|||
|
C. Sensing: wanting to get experiences.
|
|||
|
D. Intuiting: following unfounded ideas.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A & B are called rational, and C & D are called irrational. If they don't
|
|||
|
make much sense, they will be explained in more detail after explaining Types.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are also 2 classes of conscious behavior:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A. Introverted, which are people who are content to stay within their own
|
|||
|
psyche. They base their whole life on analyzing their mind.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
B. Extroverted, which are people who seek out other people. They care about
|
|||
|
the outside world and adjust to it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Also, one of the two classes usually dominates, and rarely does one see an
|
|||
|
individual with perfectly balanced classes of behavior. Jung said that an ego
|
|||
|
is a filter from the senses to the conscious mind. All ego rejections go to
|
|||
|
the personal subconscious. The ego is highly selective. Every day we are
|
|||
|
subjected to a vast number of experiences, most of which do not become
|
|||
|
conscious because the ego eliminates them before they reach consciousness.
|
|||
|
This differs from Freud's definition of ego, which we studied in class. The
|
|||
|
personal subconscious acts like a filing cabinet for those ego rejections.
|
|||
|
Clusters of related thoughts in the personal subconscious form Complexes. One
|
|||
|
type of complex we have talked about in class is the Oedipus Complex. For
|
|||
|
example, if one has a mother complex, (s)he can not be independent of his/her
|
|||
|
mother or a similar figure. Complexes are often highly visible to people, but
|
|||
|
unfelt by the individual who has the complex. As already mentioned, complexes
|
|||
|
can be revealed by word association, which will cause hang-ups, if mentioned.
|
|||
|
A strong or total complex will dominate the life of a person, and weak or
|
|||
|
partial complex will drive a person in a direction of it, but not too strongly.
|
|||
|
A complex, as Jung discovered, need not be a hindrance to a person's
|
|||
|
adjustment. In fact, quite the contrary. They can be and often are sources of
|
|||
|
inspiration and drive which are essential for outstanding achievement.
|
|||
|
Complexes are really suppressed feelings. Say you want to be a fireman, but
|
|||
|
your parents don't let you, so you might have suppressed feelings about it and
|
|||
|
let it drive you, so you might think that firemen are heroes, because you never
|
|||
|
could be one.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Collective Subconscious is hereditary. It sets up the pattern of one's
|
|||
|
psyche. A collection of so called primordial images which people inherit, also
|
|||
|
called archetypes are stored here. They are universal inclinations that all
|
|||
|
people have in common somewhere by means of heredity. The four important
|
|||
|
archetypes that play very significant roles in everyone's personality are
|
|||
|
Persona, Anima(us), Shadow, and the Self. Here is a brief explan ation of
|
|||
|
each.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Persona - from Latin word meaning "mask." Something actors wore to portray a
|
|||
|
certain personality. In Jungian psychology, the persona archetype
|
|||
|
serves a similar purpose; it enables one to portray a character
|
|||
|
that is not necessarily his own. The persona is the mask or facade
|
|||
|
one exhibits publicly, with the intention of presenting a
|
|||
|
favourable impression so that society will accept him. This is
|
|||
|
necessary for survival, for the reason that it enables us to get
|
|||
|
along with people, even those we diskike, in an amicable manner.
|
|||
|
Say, you have to get a job, and what is expected of you is such
|
|||
|
personal characteristics such as grooming, clothing, and manners,
|
|||
|
so even if you don't exhibit those at home, you have to demonstrate
|
|||
|
them at work, in order to get this job. A person may also have
|
|||
|
more than one persona.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Anima, Animus - Jung called the persona the "outward face" of the psyche
|
|||
|
because it is that face which the world sees. The "inward
|
|||
|
face" he called the anima in males and the animus in females.
|
|||
|
The anima archetype is the female side of the masculine
|
|||
|
psyche; the animus archetype is the masculine side of the
|
|||
|
female psyche. Man has developed his anima archetype by
|
|||
|
continous exposure to women over many generations, and woman
|
|||
|
has developed her animus arch etype by her exposure to men.
|
|||
|
Anima and animus archetype, like that of the persona, have
|
|||
|
strong survival value. If a man exhibits only masculine
|
|||
|
traits, his feminine traits remain unconscious and therefore
|
|||
|
these traits remain undevel oped and primitive. This, if you
|
|||
|
will remember, is like Jack, who was a macho guy, and was
|
|||
|
encouraged to discard all feminine traits. Jung said that
|
|||
|
since this image is unconscious, it is always unconsciously
|
|||
|
projected upon the person of the beloved, (i.e. girlfriend)
|
|||
|
and is one of the chief reasons for passionate attraction or
|
|||
|
aversion. So, for example, if I always thought that women
|
|||
|
were nagging, then I would project that notion onto my wife,
|
|||
|
and think that she is nagging, although she is perfectly
|
|||
|
customary. If he experiences a "passionate attraction," then
|
|||
|
the woman undoubtedly has the same traits as his anima-image
|
|||
|
of woman. Western civilization seems to place a high value
|
|||
|
on conformity and to disparage femininity in men and
|
|||
|
masculinity in women. The disparagement beings in childhood
|
|||
|
when "sissies" and "tomboys" are ridiculed. Peter was
|
|||
|
expected to be kind and gentle, which would bring deri sion.
|
|||
|
Boys are simply expected to conform to a culturally specified
|
|||
|
masculine role and girls to a feminine role. Thus, the
|
|||
|
persona takes precedence over and stifles the anima or
|
|||
|
animus.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Shadow - This is another archetype that represents one's own gender and
|
|||
|
that influences a person's relationships with his own sex. The
|
|||
|
shadow contains more of man's basic animal nature than any other
|
|||
|
archetype does. Because of its extremely deep roots in
|
|||
|
evolutionary history, it is probably the most powerful and
|
|||
|
potentially the most dangerous of all the archetypes. It is the
|
|||
|
source of all that is best and worst in man, especially in his
|
|||
|
relations with others of the same sex. In order for a person to
|
|||
|
become an integral member of the community, it is necessary to
|
|||
|
tame his animal spirits contained in the shadow. This taming is
|
|||
|
accomplished by suppressing manifestations of the shadow and by
|
|||
|
developing a strong persona which counteracts the power of the
|
|||
|
shadow. For example, if a person suppresses the animal side of
|
|||
|
his nature, he may become civilized, but he does so at the
|
|||
|
expense of decreasing the motive power for spontaneity,
|
|||
|
creativity, strong emotions, and deep insights. A shadowless
|
|||
|
life tends to become shallow and spiritless. The shadow is
|
|||
|
extremely persistent and does not yield easily to suppression.
|
|||
|
Say, a farmer was in spired to be a psychology teacher.
|
|||
|
Inspirations are always the work of the shadow. The farmer does
|
|||
|
not think this inspiration is feasible at the time, probable
|
|||
|
since his persona as a farmer is too strong, so he rejects it.
|
|||
|
But the idea keeps plaguing him, because of the persistent
|
|||
|
pressure exerted by the shadow. Finally, one day he gives in
|
|||
|
and turns from farming to teaching psychology. When the ego and
|
|||
|
the shadow work in close harmony, the person feels full of life
|
|||
|
and vigor.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Self - The concept of the total personality or psyche is a central
|
|||
|
feature of Jung's psychology. This wholeness, as pointed out in
|
|||
|
the discussion of the psyche, is not achieved by putting the parts
|
|||
|
together in a jigsaw fashion; it is there to begin with, although
|
|||
|
it takes time to mature. It is sometimes manifested in dreams, it
|
|||
|
leads to self realization, its the driving force to be a complete
|
|||
|
person! The self is the central archetype in the col lective
|
|||
|
unconscious, much as the sun us the center of the solar system.
|
|||
|
It unites the personality. When a person says he feels in harmony
|
|||
|
with himself and with the world, we can be sure that the self
|
|||
|
archetype is performing its work effectively.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are three ways how your psyche works together. One structure may
|
|||
|
compensate for the weakness of another structure, one component may oppose
|
|||
|
another component, and two or more structures may unite to form a synthesis.
|
|||
|
Compensation may be illustrated by the contrasting attitudes of extraversion
|
|||
|
and introversion. If extraversion is the dominant or superior attitude of the
|
|||
|
conscious ego, then the unconscious will compensate by devel oping the
|
|||
|
repressed attitude of introversion. Compensation also occurs between function,
|
|||
|
which I briefly mentioned earlier. A person who stresses thinking or feeling
|
|||
|
in his conscious mind will be an intuitive, sensation type unconsciously. As
|
|||
|
we studied in class, this balance, which compensation provides us with, is
|
|||
|
healthy. It prevents our psyches from becoming neurotically unbalanced. We
|
|||
|
need to have a little Peter and Jack in all of us. Opposition exists
|
|||
|
everywhere in the personality: between the persona and the shadow, between the
|
|||
|
persona and the anima, and between the shadow and the anima. The contest
|
|||
|
between the rational and irrational forces of the psyche never ceases either.
|
|||
|
One's integrity of "self" can actually determine whether or not this opposition
|
|||
|
will cause a shattering of a personality. Must personality always by a house
|
|||
|
divided against itself, though? Jung thought not. There can always be a union
|
|||
|
of opposites, a theme that looms very large in Jung's writings.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DYNAMICS
|
|||
|
--------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The psyche is a relatively closed system that has only a fixed amount of
|
|||
|
energy also called Values, which is the amount of energy devoted to a component
|
|||
|
of the mind. There are some channels into the psyche through which ene rgy can
|
|||
|
enter in form of experiences. If the psyche were a totally closed systems, it
|
|||
|
could reach a state of perfect balance, for it would not be subjected to
|
|||
|
interference from the outside. The slightest stimulus may have far-reaching
|
|||
|
consequences on one's mental stability. This shows that it is not the amount
|
|||
|
of energy that is added, but the disruptive effects that the added energy
|
|||
|
produces within the psyche. These disruptive effects are caused by massive
|
|||
|
redistributions of energy within the system. It takes only the slightest
|
|||
|
pressure on the trigger of a loaded gun to cause a great disaster. Similarly,
|
|||
|
it may take only the slightest addition of energy to an unstable psyche to
|
|||
|
produce large effects in a person's behavior. Psychic energy is also called
|
|||
|
Libido. It is not to be confused with Freud's definition of libido. Jung did
|
|||
|
not restrict libido to sexual energy as Freud did. In fact, this is one of the
|
|||
|
essential differences in the theories of the two men. It can be classified as
|
|||
|
actual or potential forces that perform psychological work. It is often
|
|||
|
expressed in desires and wants for objects. The values for things are hidden
|
|||
|
in complexes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The psyche is always active, yet it is still very difficult for people to
|
|||
|
accept this view of a continuously active psyche, because there is a strong
|
|||
|
tendency to equate psychic activity with conscious activity. Jung, as well as
|
|||
|
Freud, hammered away at this misconception, but it persists even today. The
|
|||
|
source of psychic energy is derived from one's instincts and diverted into
|
|||
|
other uses. Like a waterfall is used to create energy, you have to use your
|
|||
|
instincts to turn into energy as well. Otherwise, just like the waterfall,
|
|||
|
your instincts are completely fruitless. For example, if you think that to get
|
|||
|
a beautiful wife, you have to be rich, so you direct your sexual drive into a
|
|||
|
business persona, which will bring you money.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are two principles of psychic dynamics. What happens to all that
|
|||
|
energy?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Principle of Equivalence. Energy is not created nor destroyed. If it
|
|||
|
leaves something, it has to surface. For example, if a child devoted a lot of
|
|||
|
energy to reading comics, it might be redirected into a different persona, som
|
|||
|
ething like being Mr. Cool Dude! He then will loose interest in reading
|
|||
|
comics. Energy also has an inclination to carry tendencies of its source to
|
|||
|
its destination.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. Principle of Entropy. Energy usually flows from high to low. If you
|
|||
|
have a highly developed structure (persona, for example), instead of
|
|||
|
equalizing, it may start drawing values from other systems to boost itself even
|
|||
|
higher. Such highly energized systems have a tendency to go BOOOOM! So,
|
|||
|
entropy can destroy those high energy systems if they get too big. The
|
|||
|
operation of the entropy principle results in an equilibrium of forces. Just
|
|||
|
like two bodies of different temperatures touching each other would soon
|
|||
|
equalize temperatures. The hotter one will transfer heat to the cooler one.
|
|||
|
Once a balance is reached in your psyche, according to Jung, it will be then
|
|||
|
difficult to disturb. Tho se two principles influence the following:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Progression and Regression. Progression is the advance of psychological
|
|||
|
adaptation. For example, if you need a shadow (creativity, perhaps), you will
|
|||
|
try to develop one. When conflicting traits loose power, your psyche enters
|
|||
|
regression. Say, your persona and shadow are in opposition and because they
|
|||
|
are in opposition, they both would be suppressed, because neither would get
|
|||
|
enough libido, or energy.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DEVELOPMENT
|
|||
|
-----------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Jung stated that there are basically four stages of life. They are
|
|||
|
Childhood, Youth and Young Adulthood, Middle Age, and Old Age. In the
|
|||
|
beginning (childhood), a person's psyche is undefferentiated and this person
|
|||
|
becomes a projection of the parents psyche. Children are not individuals in
|
|||
|
the beginning of their life, because their ir memories don't have too much
|
|||
|
stored in them and they lack a sense of continuity because of that. As they
|
|||
|
gain experience, they realize that they are their own person and not their
|
|||
|
parents' projection. The stage of youth and adulthood is announced by the
|
|||
|
physiological changes that occur during puberty. During this stage, an
|
|||
|
individual establishes his/her position in life. His vocation and marriage
|
|||
|
partner are determined. A person usually uses his Anima and Shadow to d ecide
|
|||
|
those things. Values are channeled into his establishment in the outside
|
|||
|
world. Once one is independent, even a small experience can influence him
|
|||
|
greatly. The Middle Age is the one often neglected by psychiatrists. Lots of
|
|||
|
people have problems in this stage. They usually don't know what to do with
|
|||
|
the energy left over that was devoted to establishing positions in society as
|
|||
|
youth. As the principle of entropy suggests, the energy is conserved, so once
|
|||
|
an adult put it to use, he must redirect it elsewhere. Jung stated that those
|
|||
|
left-over energies can be usefully diverted into spiritual contemplation and
|
|||
|
expansion. Nothing much happens in old age. People have so much energy of
|
|||
|
experiences in their psyche that even a major experience won't upset their
|
|||
|
psychological balance.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Often, society will force people to assume prefered types. Types are
|
|||
|
categories of classifications of psyches which are non-absolute and have no
|
|||
|
definite boundaries. There are eight "types." Types are combinations of
|
|||
|
functions and attitudes (page 3). The following are the eight main types:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Extraverted Thinking Type. This type of man elevates objective thinking
|
|||
|
into the ruling passion of his life. He is typified by the scientist who
|
|||
|
devotes his energy to learning as much as he can about the objective
|
|||
|
world. The most developed extraverted thinker is an Einstein.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. Introverted Thinking Type. This type is inward-directed in his thinking.
|
|||
|
He is exemplified by the philosopher or existential psychologist who
|
|||
|
seeks to understand the reality of his own being. He may eventually
|
|||
|
break his ties with reality and become schizophrenic.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. Extraverted Feeling Type. This type, which Jung observes is more
|
|||
|
frequently found in women, subordinates thinking to feeling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4. Introverted Feeling Type. This type is also more commonly found among
|
|||
|
women. Unlike their extraverted sisters, introverted feeling persons
|
|||
|
keep their feelings hidden from the world.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5. Extraverted Sensation Type. People of this type, mainly men, take an
|
|||
|
interest in accumulating facts about the external world. They are
|
|||
|
realistic, practical, and hardheaded, but they are not particularly
|
|||
|
concerned about what things mean.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6. Introverted Sensation Type. Like all introverts, the introverted
|
|||
|
sensation type stands aloof from external objects, immersing himself in
|
|||
|
his own psychic sensations. He considers the world to be banal and
|
|||
|
uninteresting.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
7. Extraverted Intuitive Type. People of this type, commonly women, are
|
|||
|
characterized by flightiness and instability. They jump from situation
|
|||
|
to situation to discover new possibilities in the external world. They
|
|||
|
are always looking for new worlds to conquer before they have conquered
|
|||
|
old ones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
8. Introverted Intuitive Type. The artist is a representative of this type,
|
|||
|
but it also contains dreamers, prophets, visionaries, and cranks. He
|
|||
|
usually thinks of himself as a misunderstood genius.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Variations in the degree to which each of the attitudes and functions are
|
|||
|
consciously developed or remain unconscious and undeveloped can produce a wide
|
|||
|
range of differences among individuals.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This book is an extremely valuable source of thought provoking logic. Jung
|
|||
|
wrote with common sense, passion, and compassion, and the reader experiences a
|
|||
|
"shock of recognition"; he will recognize truths he has known, but which he has
|
|||
|
not been able to express in words. This book made me think about myself, and
|
|||
|
people in general. How people's minds work, including my own. I found a lot
|
|||
|
of "truth" or at least I though I did in Jung's teachings. I could relate some
|
|||
|
of the reading material to elements studied in class. One will be astounded by
|
|||
|
the number of Jung's ideas that anticipated those of later writers. Many of
|
|||
|
the new trends in psychology and related fields are indebted to Jung, who first
|
|||
|
gave them their direction. The book is also interesting, because of its
|
|||
|
challenging nature. I suppose that not all people would enjoy reading such
|
|||
|
type of literature, since many people in this world are sensational types. I
|
|||
|
certainly did enjoy it, and have found out some things about myself in the
|
|||
|
process. The book is very well written. It has many good analogies and
|
|||
|
explanations which even the most sensational type would understand. The
|
|||
|
collection of information is tremendous. There is so much information bundled
|
|||
|
in 130 pages, that it makes you think that 500 pages would not be enough to
|
|||
|
really explain deeply the subject matter. This book can be faultlessly us ed
|
|||
|
as a textbook, which could prove to be salutary in psychology classes. I
|
|||
|
strongly recommend reading this book to all audiences that want to. A person,
|
|||
|
content with the world around him, not wishing to challenge the puzzles of
|
|||
|
nature, should not. This book is a treasure for all who seek to explore the
|
|||
|
human mind.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ilya Shmulevich
|
|||
|
|