208 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
208 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
|
|||
|
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
|
|||
|
[] []
|
|||
|
[] THE INS AND OUTS []
|
|||
|
[] OF []
|
|||
|
[] PACKET SWITCHING []
|
|||
|
[] []
|
|||
|
[] by: The Seker []
|
|||
|
[] Tribunal of Knowledge! []
|
|||
|
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
|
|||
|
[] Written (c) June 23, 1986 []
|
|||
|
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
'TRIBUNAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD'
|
|||
|
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
|
|||
|
Not many people are quite aware how complex packet switched networks are.
|
|||
|
In this file I hope to clear up all confusion and answer all questions
|
|||
|
concerning packet switching and making international datacalls via packet
|
|||
|
switched networks.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
HISTORY
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
Using normal phone lines, computers can only transmit data at speeds up to
|
|||
|
1200 bps efficiently. This is very slow compared to the inner workings of even
|
|||
|
the slowest computer. If computers could transmit across phone lines at higher
|
|||
|
speeds, 9600 bps for example, there would still be the problem of using a
|
|||
|
compatible protocol. Packet switched networks take care of these and other
|
|||
|
problems dealing with communications.
|
|||
|
The idea of developing a completely computerized network for computers was
|
|||
|
first discussed in the mid 1960's..probably someplace like Bell Labs, MIT, or
|
|||
|
the like. But it wasn't until a decade later that the theory was put into
|
|||
|
construction.
|
|||
|
The first packet network was a project of the Defense Department. They
|
|||
|
labeled it ArpaNet. It was and still is a boon for advanced hackers, as it is
|
|||
|
host to over 300 government related computers. (See 'Hacking ArpaNet' written
|
|||
|
by the Wizard of ArpaNet for an indepth look at breaching this system.)
|
|||
|
Today there are over five commercial packet networks in the United States
|
|||
|
alone (Telenet, Tymnet, CompuServe, etc), and many more throughout the world.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
HOW IT WORKS
|
|||
|
============
|
|||
|
In essence, packet switching services operate at 4800 bps full duplex
|
|||
|
(both direction simulstaneously) and use a form of TDM (Time Division
|
|||
|
Multiplexing), a transmission which is basis for most of the world's voice
|
|||
|
communications. Transmission streams are separated into convenient sized
|
|||
|
blocks or 'packets', each one of which contains a head and tail signifying the
|
|||
|
origination and destination of the data. The packets are assembled by either
|
|||
|
the originating system or by a special facility supplied by the packet switch
|
|||
|
system. Packets in a single transmission may follow the same physical path
|
|||
|
(same cable) or may use an alternate route (ie. a detour cable) depending on
|
|||
|
the congestion of the system. The packets from one 'conversation' are very
|
|||
|
likely to be interleaved with packets from other 'conversations'. The
|
|||
|
originating and receiving computers see none of this mixing. At the receiving
|
|||
|
end, the various packets are stripped of their routing information, and
|
|||
|
re-assembled in correct order before presentation to the computer terminal.
|
|||
|
All public networks that use packet switching have installed a standard
|
|||
|
protocall to try and be compatible with each other. (good luck) The standard,
|
|||
|
which is called CCITT X.25 (Developed at the Geneva conferences.), is
|
|||
|
implemented on all international datacalls. This is a complex system for
|
|||
|
interface between data terminal equipment and data circuit-terminating
|
|||
|
equipment.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ACCESSING
|
|||
|
=========
|
|||
|
Users (hackers) can access packet switching in a variety of ways. Special
|
|||
|
terminals called Packet Terminals, which are usually hard wired to the nearest
|
|||
|
PSS (Packet Switch Stream), that are able to create and arrange data into the
|
|||
|
correct format are often used. This is very expensive, a reason why you will
|
|||
|
only be likely to see these type of terminals within large company office
|
|||
|
buildings. The average person will probably access a packet network using an
|
|||
|
ordinary ascii terminal (computer and modem), and connect to a special PSS
|
|||
|
facility called a PAD (Packet Assembler/Disassembler) which will handle the
|
|||
|
formatting for them.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
USING
|
|||
|
=====
|
|||
|
To use a public packet network it is usually required for one to have a
|
|||
|
NUI (Network User Identity) which is registered at your local PSE (Packet
|
|||
|
Switch Exchange) for billing purposes...or a way around this.
|
|||
|
Dial into your local PAD (often called port) and enter your NUI. If a
|
|||
|
valid ID is not given, the port will usually throw you off. (There are a few
|
|||
|
exceptions which we will discuss later.) Then one enters the NUA (Network User
|
|||
|
Address) or call name of the computer he/she wants to access. Each computer on
|
|||
|
a network has one given to them. This is usually in the form of numbers or
|
|||
|
somtimes letters. (As in Tymnet's case.) After the correct information is
|
|||
|
entered, the network will connect you via its private sattelite system to the
|
|||
|
local phone system of your destination and then onto the computer you wish
|
|||
|
to access.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
BILLING
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
Billing on networks is done to either the user or reversed and charged to
|
|||
|
the designated computer. Charging is not done according to the distance of the
|
|||
|
call or by the time passed, rather by how many packets exchanged and sometimes
|
|||
|
a small fee for CPU (Centeral Processing Unit) time.
|
|||
|
Many packet networks do not require you to have an NUI at all. One of
|
|||
|
these that many of you probably have worked with is Telenet. It is a leading
|
|||
|
public network throughout the continent. Billing on there is a variation of
|
|||
|
the norm. There is only a charge to a user when he/she wants to access a
|
|||
|
computer internationally or one which doesn't accept the charges of the
|
|||
|
datacall. (ie. REFUSE COLLECT CONNECT 00 AA) Billing like this will probably
|
|||
|
disappear soon due to the greed of big business.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
INTERNATIONAL DATACALLS
|
|||
|
=======================
|
|||
|
If a person wishes to call a computer located on a foreign network, there
|
|||
|
is a little procedure which must be done. As I said earlier, each computer on
|
|||
|
a network has its own address. (NUA) Networks also have their own 'address',
|
|||
|
which is called a DNIC. (Data Network Identification Code) This code is four
|
|||
|
numerical digits long. The first three numbers in this code represent which
|
|||
|
country the network is located in. The fourth digit is which service in that
|
|||
|
particuliar country, as some countries have more than one network. (For
|
|||
|
example, 5052 is Australia's Auspac DNIC. 505 is the country code. 2 is the
|
|||
|
service code.) A list follows:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
COUNTRY NETWORK DNIC
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
Australia Auspac 5052
|
|||
|
Australia Midas 5053
|
|||
|
Belgium Euronet 2062/2063
|
|||
|
Canada Datapac 3020
|
|||
|
Canada Globedat 3025
|
|||
|
Canada Infoswitch 3029
|
|||
|
Denmark Euronet 2383
|
|||
|
France Transpac 2080
|
|||
|
France Antilles Euronet 3400
|
|||
|
Germany (West) Datex P 2624
|
|||
|
Germany (West) Euronet 2623
|
|||
|
Great Britain IPSS 2342
|
|||
|
Hong Kong IDAS 4542
|
|||
|
Irish Republic Euronet 2723
|
|||
|
Italy Euronet 2223
|
|||
|
DDX-P 4401
|
|||
|
Japan Venux-P 4408
|
|||
|
Luxembourg Euronet 2703
|
|||
|
Netherlands Euronet 2043
|
|||
|
Norway Norpak 2422
|
|||
|
Singapore Telepac 5252
|
|||
|
South Africa Saponet 6550
|
|||
|
Spain TIDA 2141
|
|||
|
Sweden Telepak 2405
|
|||
|
Switzerland Datalink 2289
|
|||
|
Switzerland Euronet 2283
|
|||
|
USA Autonet 3126
|
|||
|
USA CompuServe 3132
|
|||
|
USA ITT (UDTS) 3103
|
|||
|
USA RCA (LSDS) 3113
|
|||
|
USA Telenet 3110
|
|||
|
USA Tymnet 3106
|
|||
|
USA Uninet 3125
|
|||
|
USA WUI (DBS) 3104
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As you can see, the the United States has many services. But their DNIC
|
|||
|
doesn't follow the pattern I described earlier. (ie. first three digits
|
|||
|
represent country, last is service) I am not quite sure why this is, but I
|
|||
|
think it may be because each of the US services listed are privately owned.
|
|||
|
As I was saying earlier, there is a little extra bit of information you
|
|||
|
must give the network when making an international call. Instead of just
|
|||
|
emtering the NUA like on a domestic call, you have to enter the DNIC and append
|
|||
|
the NUA or you will not complete you call and probably will get an error code.
|
|||
|
Here is what a call from Telenet to Cambridge University's port selector in
|
|||
|
England, which is located on Euronet (In Britain they call it IPSS.) would
|
|||
|
look like:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TELENET
|
|||
|
714A
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TERMINAL= d1
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ID EXAMPLE
|
|||
|
PASSWORD?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ID VALID
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
c 234222339399
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CONNECTED TO 234 222339399
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
What I just did was connect to a Telenet port. Enter my NUI. Then enter
|
|||
|
the DNIC for IPSS in Britain (2342) and appended the NUA for Cambridge
|
|||
|
University. (22339399) Then I was connected.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
REFERENCES
|
|||
|
==========
|
|||
|
For more detailed info on packet switching and its uses, etc, I recommend
|
|||
|
the following two books:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
'Data Communications: Facilities, Networks, and Systems Design'
|
|||
|
Doll, Dixon R., New York, Wiley, c1978
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
'Packet Radio'
|
|||
|
Rouleau, Robert and Ian Hodgson, Blue Ridge Summit, Pa., Tab Books, c1981
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|||
|
================
|
|||
|
Much of the imformation within was provided by:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Cyclone II
|
|||
|
Slave Driver
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NOTE: This document was written for informational purposes only. Any
|
|||
|
application of what was provided within is responsibility of the user,
|
|||
|
not the author.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) 1986 TRIBUNAL OF KNOWLEDGE! <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|