89 lines
5.8 KiB
Plaintext
89 lines
5.8 KiB
Plaintext
|
The following report is from O Timothy magazine, Volume 11, Issue 2, 1994.
|
|||
|
All rights are reserved by the author. O Timothy is a monthly magazine.
|
|||
|
Annual subscription is US$20 FOR THE UNITED STATES. Send to Way of Life
|
|||
|
Literature, Bible Baptist Church, 1219 N. Harns Road, Oak Harbor,
|
|||
|
Washington 98277. FOR CANADA the subscription is $20 Canadian. Send to
|
|||
|
Bethel Baptist Church, P.O. Box 9075, London, Ontario N6E 1V0.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
THE FUNDAMENTALISM OF TOMORROW
|
|||
|
by Chester E. Tulga
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must submit to the authority of the Word
|
|||
|
of God. It is not enough to defend its inspiration; we must submit to its
|
|||
|
authority. The authority of the Word of God must not be undermined by loose
|
|||
|
interpretation; it must not be perverted by unscrupulous interpretation; it
|
|||
|
must not be nullified by appealing to a mythical Holy Spirit who sets aside
|
|||
|
the authority of the Word of God. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must
|
|||
|
accept the full inspiration of the Word of God and submit to its authority
|
|||
|
both in faith and practice; both in faith and order; both in faith and
|
|||
|
principles; both in doctrine and policies. Anything short of this will not
|
|||
|
be truly fundamental.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must preach the full gospel, not the
|
|||
|
irreducible minimum of the gospel, as some evangelicals put it; not the
|
|||
|
limited, streamlined gospel of some evangelists; not the lowest common
|
|||
|
denominator message of evangelical compromisers, but the gospel which
|
|||
|
honors the whole counsel of God; the gospel which refuses to accommodate
|
|||
|
itself to false gospels; the gospel which judges apostasy by refusing to
|
|||
|
associate itself with it; the gospel which refuses all affinity with here
|
|||
|
sy; the gospel that claims the blessing of the Holy Spirit by honoring the
|
|||
|
Word of God and refusing to join the deniers of the Son of God. We say it
|
|||
|
bluntly--a gospel that is careless of its fellowships, a gospel that is
|
|||
|
careless of the ends it serves, a gospel which is willing to compromise its
|
|||
|
own integrity, is a false gospel, however orthodox the words may be. The
|
|||
|
Gospel must be judged by its nature, by its integrity, by the ends it
|
|||
|
serves, rather than by the words it uses. The fundamentalism of tomorrow
|
|||
|
must return to the full Gospel, and proclaim the whole counsel of God,
|
|||
|
shunning the current abbreviations.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must return to the New Testament
|
|||
|
conception of the local church. There is abroad in the land a perversion of
|
|||
|
the doctrine of the true church, whereby mugwumps, whatnots, nondescript
|
|||
|
religious riffraff, loose jointed antinomians, mushy sentimentalists and
|
|||
|
flashing comets can claim membership in the true church, while refusing to
|
|||
|
face up to their responsibility to be a part of a local New Testament
|
|||
|
church. Belonging to the true church, they say, justifies holding
|
|||
|
membership in false local churches. Claiming membership in the true church,
|
|||
|
they disregard the teachings of the Word of God on the local church. The
|
|||
|
whole doctrine of the true church needs reexamination in the light of the
|
|||
|
Word of God. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must return to the Word of God,
|
|||
|
gather itself in true New Testament local churches, and repudiate that
|
|||
|
doctrine of the true church which has become a refuge for all manner of
|
|||
|
strange birds. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must be a fundamentalism of
|
|||
|
both scriptural faith and scriptural order.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must return to that uncompromising
|
|||
|
loyalty to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, which is the heart of true
|
|||
|
orthodoxy. It will not compromise with those who, denying His virgin birth,
|
|||
|
cloud His birth and set aside His Deity. It will not compromise with those
|
|||
|
who deny His Deity, thus bringing into question His integrity and
|
|||
|
authority. It will not compromise with those who deny His sinlessness, thus
|
|||
|
destroying His Saviorhood. It will not compromise with those who deny or
|
|||
|
pervert the atonement, for this is indeed the heart of the Gospel. It will
|
|||
|
not compromise with those who deny His bodily resurrection, for if Christ
|
|||
|
be not risen from the dead, we are still in our sins and there is no
|
|||
|
Gospel. It will not compromise with those who deny His personal return, for
|
|||
|
this is the only hope for our world drunken with sin. The fundamentalism of
|
|||
|
tomorrow must repudiate that cheap loyalty to Jesus of our day, that
|
|||
|
loyalty which has no indignation against those who accuse Him and repudiate
|
|||
|
Him. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must repudiate that cheap loyalty to
|
|||
|
Jesus which says "Hosanna to the King" and then warms its hands in
|
|||
|
fellowship at the fires of His enemies. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must
|
|||
|
be loyal to Christ and refuse fellowship with His foes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5. The fundamentalism of tomorrow must return again to that expectancy of
|
|||
|
the early church which looks constantly and eagerly for the Lord's return.
|
|||
|
We must repudiate that cheap premillennialism which has lost its
|
|||
|
expectancy. We must repudiate that cheap premillennialism which, in the
|
|||
|
name of denominational loyalty, supports the enemies of the very Lord they
|
|||
|
profess to be looking for. We must repudiate that cheap premillennialism
|
|||
|
which concerns itself more with prophetic details than with prophetic
|
|||
|
living. We must repudiate that cheap premillennialism which looks for the
|
|||
|
Lord tomorrow and refuses to behave itself today. We must return to that
|
|||
|
blessed hope that purifies. We must return to the blessed hope that makes
|
|||
|
us watchful. We must return to that blessed hope which makes us careful
|
|||
|
that the Lord does not return and find us doing things that dishonor Him.
|
|||
|
The premillennial fundamentalism of tomorrow must be a fundamentalism which
|
|||
|
behaves itself today.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|